This paper presents that prior partitioning of the face image will improve the face recognition performance of Principal Component Analysis.
1 of 20
More Related Content
DT-CWT SUBBAND PARTITIONING FOR FAC RECOGNITION
1. DT-CWT SUBBAND PARTITIONING
FOR FAC RECOGNITION
K. Punnam Chandar1
, T. Satya Savithri2
1
Kakatiya University
Dept. of E.C.E
Warangal, INDIA.
息 ICIIS 2014
2
JNTU
Dept. of E.C.E
Hyderabad, INDIA.
2. Outline
Motivation
The Basic Problem that we studied
Previous Work
Multi Scale Partitioning
Real Wavelets
Complex Wavelets
Our Contribution & Results
OneS Representation
Results
Conclusion
03/22/15 息 ICIIS 2014 2
3. Motivation
The Basic Problem that we studied
Principal Component Analysis [Eigen Faces]
PCA is a Statistical Method.
PCA extracts the featues from the low
frequency content of the face image.
Perform Face recongnition.
This statistical Method de-emphasizes the
high frequency information, available to
improve the recognition performace [1-2].
03/22/15 息 ICIIS 2014 3
4. Motivation
The Basic Problem that we studied
Linear Discriminant Analysis [Fisher Faces]
LDA finds a linear mapping M that
maximizes the Linear Class seperability in
the low-dimensional representation of the
data.
LDA is Suscepetible to over fitting the
training data [3].
Fisher Face approach is more senstitive to
pose variation & variation in illumination.
03/22/15 息 ICIIS 2014 4
5. Multi Resolution Wavelet Analysis
Previous Work
Discrete Wavelet Transform
J. T. Chien et al. Proposed Discriminant Wavelet faces.
C. J. Chen and J. S. Zhang, Proposed Wavelet Energy as
new feature vector.
Dual Tree Complex Wavelet Transform:
Y. H. Sun and M. H. Du, DT-CWT feature combined
with onpp for face recognition.
G. Y. Zhang et al., Combination of dual tree complex
wavelet transform and SVM for face recognition.
03/22/15 息 ICIIS 2014 5
6. Multi Resolution Wavelet Analysis
Our Previous Work:
K. Punnam Chandar et al. Suitability of Complex
Wavelets towards face recognition,
Highest recognition rate reported (rank-1) 84%.
03/22/15 息 ICIIS 2014 6
7. Multiscale Partitioning
Real Wavelets
Real Wavelets Partition the image into four
sub bands, Low-Low, Low-High, High-Low,
High-High.
Inspite of the compact support and efficient
computation the DWT suffers from four
fundamental, interwined shortcomings,
oscillations, shift variance,aliasing and directilnality.
03/22/15 息 ICIIS 2014 7
9. Multiscale Partitioning
Complex Wavelets
Complex Wavelets on the other hand partition
the image into eight sub bands.
The short comings of the real wavelets are
overcomed.
03/22/15 息 ICIIS 2014 9
11. Our Contribution
Ones Representation
The scale-1 partitioning of face image using DT-CWT
results in six complex coefficient high frequency sub
bands oriented in directions -75, - 45, -15, 15, 45, 75
and two low frequency complex sub bands Low-Low
(LL1), Low-Low (LL2).
The scale one complex sub band coefficients
magnitudes of each sub band are normalized to zero
mean and unit Variance.
03/22/15 息 ICIIS 2014 11
12. Our Contribution
Ones Representation
The resultant magnitudes of the sub bands
coefficients are arranged from low frequency
to high frequency as [LL1, LL2, -15, 15, -45, 45,
-75, 75]T
in to [(8xM/2xN/2), 1] vector, we call
this vector as one scale (OneS)
Representation.
03/22/15 息 ICIIS 2014 12
13. Face Recognition
Results on ORL Database
03/22/15 息 ICIIS 2014 13
NAME EER
VERIFICATION RATE AT
1% FAR 0.1% FAR 0.01 % FAR
CWT_ONES 3.58% 92.14% 80.71% 67.86%
DB2_ONES 8.95% 74.64% 52.14% 39.29%
COIF2_ONE
S
7.85% 73.21% 45.36% 28.21%
PCA 5.70% 83.44% 67.19% 31.25%
14. Face Recognition
Results on ORL Database
03/22/15 息 ICIIS 2014 14
NAME EER
VERIFICATION RATE AT
1% FAR 0.1% FAR 0.01 % FAR
CWT_ONES 4.64% 87.14% 69.64% 47.80%
DB2_ONES 5.00% 87.14% 67.50% 44.29%
COIF2_ONES 4.64% 87.50 70.71% 47.14%
PCA 5.70% 83.44% 67.19% 31.25%
16. DET Curves comparison of
DT-CWT, DWT & PCA (Normalized Data).
03/22/15 息 ICIIS 2014 16
17. Conclusion:
CWT, DWT Partitioning of face images
performed. Novel OneS representation is
formed using the sub bands.
Further PCA analysis is performed on OneS
representation and results are compared.
DET Curves are used to compare the
performance of OneS representation.
Relative Face recognition improvement is
3.7% with OneS representation compared to
PCA.03/22/15 息 ICIIS 2014 17
18. References:
1. Cook, Jamie, Vinod Chandran, and Sridha Sridharan. "Multiscale
representation for 3-D face recognition." Information Forensics and
Security, IEEE Transactions on 2.3 (2007): 529-536.
2. W. zhao, R. Chellapa, P. J. Phillips, and A. Rosenfeld, Face Recognition:
A Literature Survey, ACM comput. Surveys, vol.35, no.4, pp. 399-458,
2003.
3. A. Martinez and A. Kak, PCA versus LDA, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal.
Mach. Intell., vol.23,no.2,pp.228-233, Feb 2001.
4. J. T. Chien and C. C. Wu, Discriminant Wavelet faces and nearest feature
classifiers for face recognition, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell.,
vol. 24, no. 12, pp. 1644-1649, Dec. 2002.
5. L. L. Shen and L. Bai, A review on gabor wavelts for face recognition,
Pattern Anal. Appl., vol.9, pp. 273 - 292, 2006.
6. N. G. Kingsbury, Shift invariance properties of the dual tree complex
wavelet transform, in Proc. ICASSP99, Phoenix, Az, Mar. 16-19, 1999.
03/22/15 息 ICIIS 2014 18