際際滷shows by User: EricBILLIAERT / http://www.slideshare.net/images/logo.gif 際際滷shows by User: EricBILLIAERT / Tue, 21 Mar 2017 11:07:43 GMT 際際滷Share feed for 際際滷shows by User: EricBILLIAERT National identity schemes - digital identity - national ID - eGovernment /EricBILLIAERT/national-identity-schemes-digital-identity-national-id-egovernment nationalidentityschemes-170321110743
http://www.gemalto.com/govt/documents/national-identity-schemes Firstly, the national identity scheme indicates the roles of the sovereign state with regard to digital identity: Is the state a regulator? An issuer of sovereign identities or the digital derivatives of these identities? What are its responsibilities within the chosen ecosystem in terms of organization, data and applications, and infrastructure? Next, the national identity scheme establishes the underlying principles and operating methods of the digital identity ecosystem. It describes the main systems and flows linked to the use of digital identities to access services, authenticate users, and exchange and verify data linked to the service requested. Where necessary, it provides useful details on the approved identity types and trust levels supported by the ID ecosystem. For example, commercial or transactional uses for identity may have functionalities distinct from those associated with authentication in the public domain. It is clear that the deployment of digital identities under different national frameworks represents a dual challenge for nations, which must manage their sovereignty in the digital space while improving services to companies and citizens, in other words the framework for market interactions, and ultimately the healthy operation of the economy. Yet reconciling market demands and sovereignty is no simple task. It requires constructive negotiation between their respective objectives. A good example is provided by the European Union. Here, national identity schemes must be viewed in terms of both the actions of individual states, and the implementation of the eIDAS regulation (which may indicate future convergence), as well as the objectives of the European Digital Single Market and European Digital Agenda 2020 strategies. In the end, these actions surrounding digital identity demonstrate a desire to rekindle economic growth through the more effective use of digital services, and build a single digital space of trust, offering a high level of security, interoperability and data protection. ]]>
http://www.gemalto.com/govt/documents/national-identity-schemes Firstly, the national identity scheme indicates the roles of the sovereign state with regard to digital identity: Is the state a regulator? An issuer of sovereign identities or the digital derivatives of these identities? What are its responsibilities within the chosen ecosystem in terms of organization, data and applications, and infrastructure? Next, the national identity scheme establishes the underlying principles and operating methods of the digital identity ecosystem. It describes the main systems and flows linked to the use of digital identities to access services, authenticate users, and exchange and verify data linked to the service requested. Where necessary, it provides useful details on the approved identity types and trust levels supported by the ID ecosystem. For example, commercial or transactional uses for identity may have functionalities distinct from those associated with authentication in the public domain. It is clear that the deployment of digital identities under different national frameworks represents a dual challenge for nations, which must manage their sovereignty in the digital space while improving services to companies and citizens, in other words the framework for market interactions, and ultimately the healthy operation of the economy. Yet reconciling market demands and sovereignty is no simple task. It requires constructive negotiation between their respective objectives. A good example is provided by the European Union. Here, national identity schemes must be viewed in terms of both the actions of individual states, and the implementation of the eIDAS regulation (which may indicate future convergence), as well as the objectives of the European Digital Single Market and European Digital Agenda 2020 strategies. In the end, these actions surrounding digital identity demonstrate a desire to rekindle economic growth through the more effective use of digital services, and build a single digital space of trust, offering a high level of security, interoperability and data protection. ]]> Tue, 21 Mar 2017 11:07:43 GMT /EricBILLIAERT/national-identity-schemes-digital-identity-national-id-egovernment EricBILLIAERT@slideshare.net(EricBILLIAERT) National identity schemes - digital identity - national ID - eGovernment EricBILLIAERT http://www.gemalto.com/govt/documents/national-identity-schemes Firstly, the national identity scheme indicates the roles of the sovereign state with regard to digital identity: Is the state a regulator? An issuer of sovereign identities or the digital derivatives of these identities? What are its responsibilities within the chosen ecosystem in terms of organization, data and applications, and infrastructure? Next, the national identity scheme establishes the underlying principles and operating methods of the digital identity ecosystem. It describes the main systems and flows linked to the use of digital identities to access services, authenticate users, and exchange and verify data linked to the service requested. Where necessary, it provides useful details on the approved identity types and trust levels supported by the ID ecosystem. For example, commercial or transactional uses for identity may have functionalities distinct from those associated with authentication in the public domain. It is clear that the deployment of digital identities under different national frameworks represents a dual challenge for nations, which must manage their sovereignty in the digital space while improving services to companies and citizens, in other words the framework for market interactions, and ultimately the healthy operation of the economy. Yet reconciling market demands and sovereignty is no simple task. It requires constructive negotiation between their respective objectives. A good example is provided by the European Union. Here, national identity schemes must be viewed in terms of both the actions of individual states, and the implementation of the eIDAS regulation (which may indicate future convergence), as well as the objectives of the European Digital Single Market and European Digital Agenda 2020 strategies. In the end, these actions surrounding digital identity demonstrate a desire to rekindle economic growth through the more effective use of digital services, and build a single digital space of trust, offering a high level of security, interoperability and data protection. <img style="border:1px solid #C3E6D8;float:right;" alt="" src="https://cdn.slidesharecdn.com/ss_thumbnails/nationalidentityschemes-170321110743-thumbnail.jpg?width=120&amp;height=120&amp;fit=bounds" /><br> http://www.gemalto.com/govt/documents/national-identity-schemes Firstly, the national identity scheme indicates the roles of the sovereign state with regard to digital identity: Is the state a regulator? An issuer of sovereign identities or the digital derivatives of these identities? What are its responsibilities within the chosen ecosystem in terms of organization, data and applications, and infrastructure? Next, the national identity scheme establishes the underlying principles and operating methods of the digital identity ecosystem. It describes the main systems and flows linked to the use of digital identities to access services, authenticate users, and exchange and verify data linked to the service requested. Where necessary, it provides useful details on the approved identity types and trust levels supported by the ID ecosystem. For example, commercial or transactional uses for identity may have functionalities distinct from those associated with authentication in the public domain. It is clear that the deployment of digital identities under different national frameworks represents a dual challenge for nations, which must manage their sovereignty in the digital space while improving services to companies and citizens, in other words the framework for market interactions, and ultimately the healthy operation of the economy. Yet reconciling market demands and sovereignty is no simple task. It requires constructive negotiation between their respective objectives. A good example is provided by the European Union. Here, national identity schemes must be viewed in terms of both the actions of individual states, and the implementation of the eIDAS regulation (which may indicate future convergence), as well as the objectives of the European Digital Single Market and European Digital Agenda 2020 strategies. In the end, these actions surrounding digital identity demonstrate a desire to rekindle economic growth through the more effective use of digital services, and build a single digital space of trust, offering a high level of security, interoperability and data protection.
National identity schemes - digital identity - national ID - eGovernment from Eric BILLIAERT
]]> 1538 8 https://cdn.slidesharecdn.com/ss_thumbnails/nationalidentityschemes-170321110743-thumbnail.jpg?width=120&height=120&fit=bounds presentation Black http://activitystrea.ms/schema/1.0/post http://activitystrea.ms/schema/1.0/posted 0 https://public.slidesharecdn.com/v2/images/profile-picture.png