�ݺ�ߣshows by User: LucienHanssen

�ݺ�ߣshows by User: LucienHanssen / http://www.slideshare.net/images/logo.gif �ݺ�ߣshows by User: LucienHanssen / Tue, 24 Nov 2015 16:31:30 GMT �ݺ�ߣShare feed for �ݺ�ߣshows by User: LucienHanssen Responsible Nano Innovations /slideshow/responsible-nano-innovations-55470623/55470623 assessingnano-151124163130-lva1-app6891
The combination of technological promises, speculation about safety, and lack of public awareness of the consequences of nanotechnologies can easily lead to mistrust and opposition. The debate on the risks and opportunities of nanotechnologies has been going on for more than a decade, but has been limited to a small circle of specialists and institutions. Therefore, few people understand what nanotechnologies are, or even know that nano materials are already used in consumer products. In March 2009 the Dutch government decided to stimulate societal dialogue on nanotechnologies and implemented a broad discussion in which viewpoints and opinions could be expressed by all kinds of stakeholders and publics. Dutch people perceive the innovation potential of nanotechnologies as positive provided there is an adequate system for risk research, assigning permits, and nano oversight. In this respect reliability and responsibility of nano actors (risk assessors, regulators and innovators) will be decisive. Responsible nano innovation will be strongly influenced by both public perceptions of the promises and risks of nanotechnologies, and the expectation that there are responsible parties addressing remaining uncertainties. Nano actors require insight into what information is pivotal to determine whether a nano material is safe. Meanwhile, the interaction between nano actors, stakeholders and publics should be improved in order to allow discussions on safety and wider issues to keep better pace with the innovation processes. We are in need of approaches ensuring safe and responsible use of nanotechnologies that enable open routes to addressing risk and wider issues - whether these are technological, social, economic or political. Two concepts are further discussed: Safe-by-Design and Societal Incubator. Responsible nano innovation will largely depend on the willingness of nano actors to define responsibility wider than just regulating risks. ]]>
The combination of technological promises, speculation about safety, and lack of public awareness of the consequences of nanotechnologies can easily lead to mistrust and opposition. The debate on the risks and opportunities of nanotechnologies has been going on for more than a decade, but has been limited to a small circle of specialists and institutions. Therefore, few people understand what nanotechnologies are, or even know that nano materials are already used in consumer products. In March 2009 the Dutch government decided to stimulate societal dialogue on nanotechnologies and implemented a broad discussion in which viewpoints and opinions could be expressed by all kinds of stakeholders and publics. Dutch people perceive the innovation potential of nanotechnologies as positive provided there is an adequate system for risk research, assigning permits, and nano oversight. In this respect reliability and responsibility of nano actors (risk assessors, regulators and innovators) will be decisive. Responsible nano innovation will be strongly influenced by both public perceptions of the promises and risks of nanotechnologies, and the expectation that there are responsible parties addressing remaining uncertainties. Nano actors require insight into what information is pivotal to determine whether a nano material is safe. Meanwhile, the interaction between nano actors, stakeholders and publics should be improved in order to allow discussions on safety and wider issues to keep better pace with the innovation processes. We are in need of approaches ensuring safe and responsible use of nanotechnologies that enable open routes to addressing risk and wider issues - whether these are technological, social, economic or political. Two concepts are further discussed: Safe-by-Design and Societal Incubator. Responsible nano innovation will largely depend on the willingness of nano actors to define responsibility wider than just regulating risks. ]]> Tue, 24 Nov 2015 16:31:30 GMT /slideshow/responsible-nano-innovations-55470623/55470623 LucienHanssen@slideshare.net(LucienHanssen) Responsible Nano Innovations LucienHanssen The combination of technological promises, speculation about safety, and lack of public awareness of the consequences of nanotechnologies can easily lead to mistrust and opposition. The debate on the risks and opportunities of nanotechnologies has been going on for more than a decade, but has been limited to a small circle of specialists and institutions. Therefore, few people understand what nanotechnologies are, or even know that nano materials are already used in consumer products. In March 2009 the Dutch government decided to stimulate societal dialogue on nanotechnologies and implemented a broad discussion in which viewpoints and opinions could be expressed by all kinds of stakeholders and publics. Dutch people perceive the innovation potential of nanotechnologies as positive provided there is an adequate system for risk research, assigning permits, and nano oversight. In this respect reliability and responsibility of nano actors (risk assessors, regulators and innovators) will be decisive. Responsible nano innovation will be strongly influenced by both public perceptions of the promises and risks of nanotechnologies, and the expectation that there are responsible parties addressing remaining uncertainties. Nano actors require insight into what information is pivotal to determine whether a nano material is safe. Meanwhile, the interaction between nano actors, stakeholders and publics should be improved in order to allow discussions on safety and wider issues to keep better pace with the innovation processes. We are in need of approaches ensuring safe and responsible use of nanotechnologies that enable open routes to addressing risk and wider issues - whether these are technological, social, economic or political. Two concepts are further discussed: Safe-by-Design and Societal Incubator. Responsible nano innovation will largely depend on the willingness of nano actors to define responsibility wider than just regulating risks. <img style="border:1px solid #C3E6D8;float:right;" alt="" src="https://cdn.slidesharecdn.com/ss_thumbnails/assessingnano-151124163130-lva1-app6891-thumbnail.jpg?width=120&height=120&fit=bounds" /><br> The combination of technological promises, speculation about safety, and lack of public awareness of the consequences of nanotechnologies can easily lead to mistrust and opposition. The debate on the risks and opportunities of nanotechnologies has been going on for more than a decade, but has been limited to a small circle of specialists and institutions. Therefore, few people understand what nanotechnologies are, or even know that nano materials are already used in consumer products. In March 2009 the Dutch government decided to stimulate societal dialogue on nanotechnologies and implemented a broad discussion in which viewpoints and opinions could be expressed by all kinds of stakeholders and publics. Dutch people perceive the innovation potential of nanotechnologies as positive provided there is an adequate system for risk research, assigning permits, and nano oversight. In this respect reliability and responsibility of nano actors (risk assessors, regulators and innovators) will be decisive. Responsible nano innovation will be strongly influenced by both public perceptions of the promises and risks of nanotechnologies, and the expectation that there are responsible parties addressing remaining uncertainties. Nano actors require insight into what information is pivotal to determine whether a nano material is safe. Meanwhile, the interaction between nano actors, stakeholders and publics should be improved in order to allow discussions on safety and wider issues to keep better pace with the innovation processes. We are in need of approaches ensuring safe and responsible use of nanotechnologies that enable open routes to addressing risk and wider issues - whether these are technological, social, economic or political. Two concepts are further discussed: Safe-by-Design and Societal Incubator. Responsible nano innovation will largely depend on the willingness of nano actors to define responsibility wider than just regulating risks.

Responsible Nano Innovations from Lucien Hanssen

]]> 170 5 https://cdn.slidesharecdn.com/ss_thumbnails/assessingnano-151124163130-lva1-app6891-thumbnail.jpg?width=120&height=120&fit=bounds presentation Black http://activitystrea.ms/schema/1.0/post

http://activitystrea.ms/schema/1.0/posted

0 Responsible nano innovations /slideshow/responsible-nano-innovations/55469962 assessingnano-151124161808-lva1-app6891
The combination of technological promises, speculation about safety, and lack of public awareness of the consequences of nanotechnologies can easily lead to mistrust and opposition. The debate on the risks and opportunities of nanotechnologies has been going on for more than a decade, but has been limited to a small circle of specialists and institutions. Therefore, few people understand what nanotechnologies are, or even know that nano materials are already used in consumer products. In March 2009 the Dutch government decided to stimulate societal dialogue on nanotechnologies and implemented a broad discussion in which viewpoints and opinions could be expressed by all kinds of stakeholders and publics. Dutch people perceive the innovation potential of nanotechnologies as positive provided there is an adequate system for risk research, assigning permits, and nano oversight. In this respect reliability and responsibility of nano actors (risk assessors, regulators and innovators) will be decisive. Responsible nano innovation will be strongly influenced by both public perceptions of the promises and risks of nanotechnologies, and the expectation that there are responsible parties addressing remaining uncertainties. Nano actors require insight into what information is pivotal to determine whether a nano material is safe. Meanwhile, the interaction between nano actors, stakeholders and publics should be improved in order to allow discussions on safety and wider issues to keep better pace with the innovation processes. We are in need of approaches ensuring safe and responsible use of nanotechnologies that enable open routes to addressing risk and wider issues - whether these are technological, social, economic or political. Two concepts are further discussed: Safe-by-Design and Societal Incubator. Responsible nano innovation will largely depend on the willingness of nano actors to define responsibility wider than just regulating risks. ]]>
The combination of technological promises, speculation about safety, and lack of public awareness of the consequences of nanotechnologies can easily lead to mistrust and opposition. The debate on the risks and opportunities of nanotechnologies has been going on for more than a decade, but has been limited to a small circle of specialists and institutions. Therefore, few people understand what nanotechnologies are, or even know that nano materials are already used in consumer products. In March 2009 the Dutch government decided to stimulate societal dialogue on nanotechnologies and implemented a broad discussion in which viewpoints and opinions could be expressed by all kinds of stakeholders and publics. Dutch people perceive the innovation potential of nanotechnologies as positive provided there is an adequate system for risk research, assigning permits, and nano oversight. In this respect reliability and responsibility of nano actors (risk assessors, regulators and innovators) will be decisive. Responsible nano innovation will be strongly influenced by both public perceptions of the promises and risks of nanotechnologies, and the expectation that there are responsible parties addressing remaining uncertainties. Nano actors require insight into what information is pivotal to determine whether a nano material is safe. Meanwhile, the interaction between nano actors, stakeholders and publics should be improved in order to allow discussions on safety and wider issues to keep better pace with the innovation processes. We are in need of approaches ensuring safe and responsible use of nanotechnologies that enable open routes to addressing risk and wider issues - whether these are technological, social, economic or political. Two concepts are further discussed: Safe-by-Design and Societal Incubator. Responsible nano innovation will largely depend on the willingness of nano actors to define responsibility wider than just regulating risks. ]]> Tue, 24 Nov 2015 16:18:08 GMT /slideshow/responsible-nano-innovations/55469962 LucienHanssen@slideshare.net(LucienHanssen) Responsible nano innovations LucienHanssen The combination of technological promises, speculation about safety, and lack of public awareness of the consequences of nanotechnologies can easily lead to mistrust and opposition. The debate on the risks and opportunities of nanotechnologies has been going on for more than a decade, but has been limited to a small circle of specialists and institutions. Therefore, few people understand what nanotechnologies are, or even know that nano materials are already used in consumer products. In March 2009 the Dutch government decided to stimulate societal dialogue on nanotechnologies and implemented a broad discussion in which viewpoints and opinions could be expressed by all kinds of stakeholders and publics. Dutch people perceive the innovation potential of nanotechnologies as positive provided there is an adequate system for risk research, assigning permits, and nano oversight. In this respect reliability and responsibility of nano actors (risk assessors, regulators and innovators) will be decisive. Responsible nano innovation will be strongly influenced by both public perceptions of the promises and risks of nanotechnologies, and the expectation that there are responsible parties addressing remaining uncertainties. Nano actors require insight into what information is pivotal to determine whether a nano material is safe. Meanwhile, the interaction between nano actors, stakeholders and publics should be improved in order to allow discussions on safety and wider issues to keep better pace with the innovation processes. We are in need of approaches ensuring safe and responsible use of nanotechnologies that enable open routes to addressing risk and wider issues - whether these are technological, social, economic or political. Two concepts are further discussed: Safe-by-Design and Societal Incubator. Responsible nano innovation will largely depend on the willingness of nano actors to define responsibility wider than just regulating risks. <img style="border:1px solid #C3E6D8;float:right;" alt="" src="https://cdn.slidesharecdn.com/ss_thumbnails/assessingnano-151124161808-lva1-app6891-thumbnail.jpg?width=120&height=120&fit=bounds" /><br> The combination of technological promises, speculation about safety, and lack of public awareness of the consequences of nanotechnologies can easily lead to mistrust and opposition. The debate on the risks and opportunities of nanotechnologies has been going on for more than a decade, but has been limited to a small circle of specialists and institutions. Therefore, few people understand what nanotechnologies are, or even know that nano materials are already used in consumer products. In March 2009 the Dutch government decided to stimulate societal dialogue on nanotechnologies and implemented a broad discussion in which viewpoints and opinions could be expressed by all kinds of stakeholders and publics. Dutch people perceive the innovation potential of nanotechnologies as positive provided there is an adequate system for risk research, assigning permits, and nano oversight. In this respect reliability and responsibility of nano actors (risk assessors, regulators and innovators) will be decisive. Responsible nano innovation will be strongly influenced by both public perceptions of the promises and risks of nanotechnologies, and the expectation that there are responsible parties addressing remaining uncertainties. Nano actors require insight into what information is pivotal to determine whether a nano material is safe. Meanwhile, the interaction between nano actors, stakeholders and publics should be improved in order to allow discussions on safety and wider issues to keep better pace with the innovation processes. We are in need of approaches ensuring safe and responsible use of nanotechnologies that enable open routes to addressing risk and wider issues - whether these are technological, social, economic or political. Two concepts are further discussed: Safe-by-Design and Societal Incubator. Responsible nano innovation will largely depend on the willingness of nano actors to define responsibility wider than just regulating risks.

Responsible nano innovations from Lucien Hanssen

]]> 154 5 https://cdn.slidesharecdn.com/ss_thumbnails/assessingnano-151124161808-lva1-app6891-thumbnail.jpg?width=120&height=120&fit=bounds presentation Black http://activitystrea.ms/schema/1.0/post

http://activitystrea.ms/schema/1.0/posted

0 https://public.slidesharecdn.com/v2/images/profile-picture.png https://cdn.slidesharecdn.com/ss_thumbnails/assessingnano-151124163130-lva1-app6891-thumbnail.jpg?width=320&height=320&fit=bounds slideshow/responsible-nano-innovations-55470623/55470623 Responsible Nano Innov... https://cdn.slidesharecdn.com/ss_thumbnails/assessingnano-151124161808-lva1-app6891-thumbnail.jpg?width=320&height=320&fit=bounds slideshow/responsible-nano-innovations/55469962 Responsible nano innov...