ºÝºÝߣshows by User: NishantKumar137 / http://www.slideshare.net/images/logo.gif ºÝºÝߣshows by User: NishantKumar137 / Thu, 22 Feb 2024 16:50:39 GMT ºÝºÝߣShare feed for ºÝºÝߣshows by User: NishantKumar137 Handout_of_Antibiotics_in_Dentistry.ppt kkk /slideshow/handoutofantibioticsindentistryppt-kkk/266443660 handoutofantibioticsindentistry-240222165039-494ce72f
I am proud to recommend, Dr.Nishant Kumar who has applied for a teaching position at your University. I know Dr.Nishant Kumar for more than 5 years. Dr. Mahesh came to me 5 years ago to discuss the possibility of doing research under my guidance. I met with him and outlined the idea of doing research in Theoretical Computer Science. I gave him some background reading at our first meeting. By the time of our second meeting he had read what I had given him and he came up with a good research problem. This level of effort is typical of a good research student, so I agreed to take him to guide for his Ph.D. As I have been working in the field of formal languages for more than 10 years, I know very well about his work. He has done good research work towards his Ph.D in the area of contextual grammars and bio-inspired computing models. He has defined some new complexity measures, various ambiguity levels for Insertion-deletion systems. He has studied the trade-off between ambiguity levels and (descriptional) complexity measures for insertion deletion systems and contextual grammars by introducing a new notion in formal language theory called 'pseudo inherently ambiguous' languages. He has also introduced a new bio-inspired computing model named Matrix insertion-deletion systems and modelled various bio-molecular structures that occurs at various levels. Further, he also analyzed the generative capacity of Matrix insertion-deletion systems with other relevant grammar formalisms. Dr. Mahesh proved himself to be a capable mentor and teacher. Currently he is guiding 3 Ph.D research scholars in the area of formal languages and automata theory. He is clearly able to transmit his passion and talent for research to young scientists. Dr. Mahesh has taught Theory of Computation, Compiler Design and Advanced Compiler Design courses for both under graduate and post graduate students. Dr. Mahesh is one of my few colleagues to whom I will entrust my class when I travel. He is the co-investigator to a DST project proposal written by me. Thus he has good experience in research, teaching, and writing grant proposals. In short, I give Dr. Mahesh my highest recommendation. He is one of my finest colleagues, good researcher and talented teacher. I am sure that he will shine in any academic environment. He would be a good catch for any department and I urge you to consider his candidacy seriously. I wish him success in all his endeavours. Prof.(Dr.) Kumar School of Computing Science and Engg, VIT University I am proud to recommend, Dr.Nishant Kumar who has applied for a teaching position at your University. I know Dr.Nishant Kumar for more than 5 years. Dr. Mahesh came to me 5 years ago to discuss the possibility of doing research under my guidance. I met with him and outlined the idea of doing research in Theoretical Computer Science. I gave him some background reading at our first meeting. By the time of our second meeting he had read what I had given him and he came u]]>
I am proud to recommend, Dr.Nishant Kumar who has applied for a teaching position at your University. I know Dr.Nishant Kumar for more than 5 years. Dr. Mahesh came to me 5 years ago to discuss the possibility of doing research under my guidance. I met with him and outlined the idea of doing research in Theoretical Computer Science. I gave him some background reading at our first meeting. By the time of our second meeting he had read what I had given him and he came up with a good research problem. This level of effort is typical of a good research student, so I agreed to take him to guide for his Ph.D. As I have been working in the field of formal languages for more than 10 years, I know very well about his work. He has done good research work towards his Ph.D in the area of contextual grammars and bio-inspired computing models. He has defined some new complexity measures, various ambiguity levels for Insertion-deletion systems. He has studied the trade-off between ambiguity levels and (descriptional) complexity measures for insertion deletion systems and contextual grammars by introducing a new notion in formal language theory called 'pseudo inherently ambiguous' languages. He has also introduced a new bio-inspired computing model named Matrix insertion-deletion systems and modelled various bio-molecular structures that occurs at various levels. Further, he also analyzed the generative capacity of Matrix insertion-deletion systems with other relevant grammar formalisms. Dr. Mahesh proved himself to be a capable mentor and teacher. Currently he is guiding 3 Ph.D research scholars in the area of formal languages and automata theory. He is clearly able to transmit his passion and talent for research to young scientists. Dr. Mahesh has taught Theory of Computation, Compiler Design and Advanced Compiler Design courses for both under graduate and post graduate students. Dr. Mahesh is one of my few colleagues to whom I will entrust my class when I travel. He is the co-investigator to a DST project proposal written by me. Thus he has good experience in research, teaching, and writing grant proposals. In short, I give Dr. Mahesh my highest recommendation. He is one of my finest colleagues, good researcher and talented teacher. I am sure that he will shine in any academic environment. He would be a good catch for any department and I urge you to consider his candidacy seriously. I wish him success in all his endeavours. Prof.(Dr.) Kumar School of Computing Science and Engg, VIT University I am proud to recommend, Dr.Nishant Kumar who has applied for a teaching position at your University. I know Dr.Nishant Kumar for more than 5 years. Dr. Mahesh came to me 5 years ago to discuss the possibility of doing research under my guidance. I met with him and outlined the idea of doing research in Theoretical Computer Science. I gave him some background reading at our first meeting. By the time of our second meeting he had read what I had given him and he came u]]> Thu, 22 Feb 2024 16:50:39 GMT /slideshow/handoutofantibioticsindentistryppt-kkk/266443660 NishantKumar137@slideshare.net(NishantKumar137) Handout_of_Antibiotics_in_Dentistry.ppt kkk NishantKumar137 I am proud to recommend, Dr.Nishant Kumar who has applied for a teaching position at your University. I know Dr.Nishant Kumar for more than 5 years. Dr. Mahesh came to me 5 years ago to discuss the possibility of doing research under my guidance. I met with him and outlined the idea of doing research in Theoretical Computer Science. I gave him some background reading at our first meeting. By the time of our second meeting he had read what I had given him and he came up with a good research problem. This level of effort is typical of a good research student, so I agreed to take him to guide for his Ph.D. As I have been working in the field of formal languages for more than 10 years, I know very well about his work. He has done good research work towards his Ph.D in the area of contextual grammars and bio-inspired computing models. He has defined some new complexity measures, various ambiguity levels for Insertion-deletion systems. He has studied the trade-off between ambiguity levels and (descriptional) complexity measures for insertion deletion systems and contextual grammars by introducing a new notion in formal language theory called 'pseudo inherently ambiguous' languages. He has also introduced a new bio-inspired computing model named Matrix insertion-deletion systems and modelled various bio-molecular structures that occurs at various levels. Further, he also analyzed the generative capacity of Matrix insertion-deletion systems with other relevant grammar formalisms. Dr. Mahesh proved himself to be a capable mentor and teacher. Currently he is guiding 3 Ph.D research scholars in the area of formal languages and automata theory. He is clearly able to transmit his passion and talent for research to young scientists. Dr. Mahesh has taught Theory of Computation, Compiler Design and Advanced Compiler Design courses for both under graduate and post graduate students. Dr. Mahesh is one of my few colleagues to whom I will entrust my class when I travel. He is the co-investigator to a DST project proposal written by me. Thus he has good experience in research, teaching, and writing grant proposals. In short, I give Dr. Mahesh my highest recommendation. He is one of my finest colleagues, good researcher and talented teacher. I am sure that he will shine in any academic environment. He would be a good catch for any department and I urge you to consider his candidacy seriously. I wish him success in all his endeavours. Prof.(Dr.) Kumar School of Computing Science and Engg, VIT University I am proud to recommend, Dr.Nishant Kumar who has applied for a teaching position at your University. I know Dr.Nishant Kumar for more than 5 years. Dr. Mahesh came to me 5 years ago to discuss the possibility of doing research under my guidance. I met with him and outlined the idea of doing research in Theoretical Computer Science. I gave him some background reading at our first meeting. By the time of our second meeting he had read what I had given him and he came u <img style="border:1px solid #C3E6D8;float:right;" alt="" src="https://cdn.slidesharecdn.com/ss_thumbnails/handoutofantibioticsindentistry-240222165039-494ce72f-thumbnail.jpg?width=120&amp;height=120&amp;fit=bounds" /><br> I am proud to recommend, Dr.Nishant Kumar who has applied for a teaching position at your University. I know Dr.Nishant Kumar for more than 5 years. Dr. Mahesh came to me 5 years ago to discuss the possibility of doing research under my guidance. I met with him and outlined the idea of doing research in Theoretical Computer Science. I gave him some background reading at our first meeting. By the time of our second meeting he had read what I had given him and he came up with a good research problem. This level of effort is typical of a good research student, so I agreed to take him to guide for his Ph.D. As I have been working in the field of formal languages for more than 10 years, I know very well about his work. He has done good research work towards his Ph.D in the area of contextual grammars and bio-inspired computing models. He has defined some new complexity measures, various ambiguity levels for Insertion-deletion systems. He has studied the trade-off between ambiguity levels and (descriptional) complexity measures for insertion deletion systems and contextual grammars by introducing a new notion in formal language theory called &#39;pseudo inherently ambiguous&#39; languages. He has also introduced a new bio-inspired computing model named Matrix insertion-deletion systems and modelled various bio-molecular structures that occurs at various levels. Further, he also analyzed the generative capacity of Matrix insertion-deletion systems with other relevant grammar formalisms. Dr. Mahesh proved himself to be a capable mentor and teacher. Currently he is guiding 3 Ph.D research scholars in the area of formal languages and automata theory. He is clearly able to transmit his passion and talent for research to young scientists. Dr. Mahesh has taught Theory of Computation, Compiler Design and Advanced Compiler Design courses for both under graduate and post graduate students. Dr. Mahesh is one of my few colleagues to whom I will entrust my class when I travel. He is the co-investigator to a DST project proposal written by me. Thus he has good experience in research, teaching, and writing grant proposals. In short, I give Dr. Mahesh my highest recommendation. He is one of my finest colleagues, good researcher and talented teacher. I am sure that he will shine in any academic environment. He would be a good catch for any department and I urge you to consider his candidacy seriously. I wish him success in all his endeavours. Prof.(Dr.) Kumar School of Computing Science and Engg, VIT University I am proud to recommend, Dr.Nishant Kumar who has applied for a teaching position at your University. I know Dr.Nishant Kumar for more than 5 years. Dr. Mahesh came to me 5 years ago to discuss the possibility of doing research under my guidance. I met with him and outlined the idea of doing research in Theoretical Computer Science. I gave him some background reading at our first meeting. By the time of our second meeting he had read what I had given him and he came u
Handout_of_Antibiotics_in_Dentistry.ppt kkk from NISHANT KUMAR
]]> 4 0 https://cdn.slidesharecdn.com/ss_thumbnails/handoutofantibioticsindentistry-240222165039-494ce72f-thumbnail.jpg?width=120&height=120&fit=bounds presentation Black http://activitystrea.ms/schema/1.0/post http://activitystrea.ms/schema/1.0/posted 0 X ray films.pptxThe system measure deflection of a laser beam from a refernce mirror attached to a bracket bonded to the pa /slideshow/x-ray-filmspptxthe-system-measure-deflection-of-a-laser-beam-from-a-refernce-mirror-attached-to-a-bracket-bonded-to-the-pa/266443173 xrayfilms-240222160137-b4b23603
A Film holder is a device to hold the film which allow easy and predictable alignment of the X- ray tube. Three types of film holders: Uncoupled positioning devices consisting of intraoral film holders, but no aiming devices; Semi rigidly coupled devices that have intra oral film holders and attached aiming rods with or without aiming rings; Rigidly coupled positioning devices where the intra oral film holder, beam aiming devices, and x-ray cone are all physically connected. hemostat with rubber biteblock held the film and a long metal rod . 1951: The snap a ray instrument was developed. 1962: The precision X-ray instrument was introduced. 1967: Rinn instruments for use with bisecting angle technique 1968 : for use with the parallel technique. 1987: Cephalometric unit was used for the stabilization of the patient. 1993: Kwik bite and Intrax devices uses for orthodontic purposes. And Rinn xcp bitewing device was also used. 1996: Electronically Guided Alignment Device (EGAD) system was introduced. With this system a custom made occlusal biteblock held an aluminium wedge. The system measure deflection of a laser beam from a refernce mirror attached to a bracket bonded to the patient’s mirrorIntensifying screens are image receptor system used in combination with x ray film for all extra oral radiographic procedures such as OPG , ceph and skull radiography Types- Depending on light emitted Blue emitting visible light Green emitting visible light Consist of light sensitive phosphor crystals suspended in plastic material When the phosphors are struck by x ray photons they emit visible light that exposes the xray film. Most frequently used- calcium tungstate – Blue visible light Rare earth element- Advantages- 4 x more efficient Green emission spectrum hich allow easy and predictable alignment of the X- ray tube. Three types of film holders: Uncoupled positioning devices consisting of intraoral film holders, but no aiming devices; Semi rigidly coupled devices that have intra oral film holders and attached aiming rods with or without aiming rings; Rigidly coupled positioning devices where the intra oral film holder, beam aiming devices, and x-ray cone are all physically connected. hemostat with rubber biteblock held the film and a long metal rod . 1951: The snap a ray instrument was developed. 1962: The precision X-ray instrument was introduced. 1967: Rinn instruments for use with bisecting angle technique 1968 : for use with the parallel technique. 1987: Cephalometric unit was used for the stabilization of the patient. 1993: Kwik bite and Intrax devices uses for orthodontic purposes. And Rinn xcp bitewing device was also used. 1996: Electronically Guided Alignment Device (EGAD) system was introduced. With this system a custom made occlusal biteblock held an aluminium wedge. The system measure deflection of a laser beam from a refernce mirror attached to a bracket bonded to the patie]]>
A Film holder is a device to hold the film which allow easy and predictable alignment of the X- ray tube. Three types of film holders: Uncoupled positioning devices consisting of intraoral film holders, but no aiming devices; Semi rigidly coupled devices that have intra oral film holders and attached aiming rods with or without aiming rings; Rigidly coupled positioning devices where the intra oral film holder, beam aiming devices, and x-ray cone are all physically connected. hemostat with rubber biteblock held the film and a long metal rod . 1951: The snap a ray instrument was developed. 1962: The precision X-ray instrument was introduced. 1967: Rinn instruments for use with bisecting angle technique 1968 : for use with the parallel technique. 1987: Cephalometric unit was used for the stabilization of the patient. 1993: Kwik bite and Intrax devices uses for orthodontic purposes. And Rinn xcp bitewing device was also used. 1996: Electronically Guided Alignment Device (EGAD) system was introduced. With this system a custom made occlusal biteblock held an aluminium wedge. The system measure deflection of a laser beam from a refernce mirror attached to a bracket bonded to the patient’s mirrorIntensifying screens are image receptor system used in combination with x ray film for all extra oral radiographic procedures such as OPG , ceph and skull radiography Types- Depending on light emitted Blue emitting visible light Green emitting visible light Consist of light sensitive phosphor crystals suspended in plastic material When the phosphors are struck by x ray photons they emit visible light that exposes the xray film. Most frequently used- calcium tungstate – Blue visible light Rare earth element- Advantages- 4 x more efficient Green emission spectrum hich allow easy and predictable alignment of the X- ray tube. Three types of film holders: Uncoupled positioning devices consisting of intraoral film holders, but no aiming devices; Semi rigidly coupled devices that have intra oral film holders and attached aiming rods with or without aiming rings; Rigidly coupled positioning devices where the intra oral film holder, beam aiming devices, and x-ray cone are all physically connected. hemostat with rubber biteblock held the film and a long metal rod . 1951: The snap a ray instrument was developed. 1962: The precision X-ray instrument was introduced. 1967: Rinn instruments for use with bisecting angle technique 1968 : for use with the parallel technique. 1987: Cephalometric unit was used for the stabilization of the patient. 1993: Kwik bite and Intrax devices uses for orthodontic purposes. And Rinn xcp bitewing device was also used. 1996: Electronically Guided Alignment Device (EGAD) system was introduced. With this system a custom made occlusal biteblock held an aluminium wedge. The system measure deflection of a laser beam from a refernce mirror attached to a bracket bonded to the patie]]> Thu, 22 Feb 2024 16:01:37 GMT /slideshow/x-ray-filmspptxthe-system-measure-deflection-of-a-laser-beam-from-a-refernce-mirror-attached-to-a-bracket-bonded-to-the-pa/266443173 NishantKumar137@slideshare.net(NishantKumar137) X ray films.pptxThe system measure deflection of a laser beam from a refernce mirror attached to a bracket bonded to the pa NishantKumar137 A Film holder is a device to hold the film which allow easy and predictable alignment of the X- ray tube. Three types of film holders: Uncoupled positioning devices consisting of intraoral film holders, but no aiming devices; Semi rigidly coupled devices that have intra oral film holders and attached aiming rods with or without aiming rings; Rigidly coupled positioning devices where the intra oral film holder, beam aiming devices, and x-ray cone are all physically connected. hemostat with rubber biteblock held the film and a long metal rod . 1951: The snap a ray instrument was developed. 1962: The precision X-ray instrument was introduced. 1967: Rinn instruments for use with bisecting angle technique 1968 : for use with the parallel technique. 1987: Cephalometric unit was used for the stabilization of the patient. 1993: Kwik bite and Intrax devices uses for orthodontic purposes. And Rinn xcp bitewing device was also used. 1996: Electronically Guided Alignment Device (EGAD) system was introduced. With this system a custom made occlusal biteblock held an aluminium wedge. The system measure deflection of a laser beam from a refernce mirror attached to a bracket bonded to the patient’s mirrorIntensifying screens are image receptor system used in combination with x ray film for all extra oral radiographic procedures such as OPG , ceph and skull radiography Types- Depending on light emitted Blue emitting visible light Green emitting visible light Consist of light sensitive phosphor crystals suspended in plastic material When the phosphors are struck by x ray photons they emit visible light that exposes the xray film. Most frequently used- calcium tungstate – Blue visible light Rare earth element- Advantages- 4 x more efficient Green emission spectrum hich allow easy and predictable alignment of the X- ray tube. Three types of film holders: Uncoupled positioning devices consisting of intraoral film holders, but no aiming devices; Semi rigidly coupled devices that have intra oral film holders and attached aiming rods with or without aiming rings; Rigidly coupled positioning devices where the intra oral film holder, beam aiming devices, and x-ray cone are all physically connected. hemostat with rubber biteblock held the film and a long metal rod . 1951: The snap a ray instrument was developed. 1962: The precision X-ray instrument was introduced. 1967: Rinn instruments for use with bisecting angle technique 1968 : for use with the parallel technique. 1987: Cephalometric unit was used for the stabilization of the patient. 1993: Kwik bite and Intrax devices uses for orthodontic purposes. And Rinn xcp bitewing device was also used. 1996: Electronically Guided Alignment Device (EGAD) system was introduced. With this system a custom made occlusal biteblock held an aluminium wedge. The system measure deflection of a laser beam from a refernce mirror attached to a bracket bonded to the patie <img style="border:1px solid #C3E6D8;float:right;" alt="" src="https://cdn.slidesharecdn.com/ss_thumbnails/xrayfilms-240222160137-b4b23603-thumbnail.jpg?width=120&amp;height=120&amp;fit=bounds" /><br> A Film holder is a device to hold the film which allow easy and predictable alignment of the X- ray tube. Three types of film holders: Uncoupled positioning devices consisting of intraoral film holders, but no aiming devices; Semi rigidly coupled devices that have intra oral film holders and attached aiming rods with or without aiming rings; Rigidly coupled positioning devices where the intra oral film holder, beam aiming devices, and x-ray cone are all physically connected. hemostat with rubber biteblock held the film and a long metal rod . 1951: The snap a ray instrument was developed. 1962: The precision X-ray instrument was introduced. 1967: Rinn instruments for use with bisecting angle technique 1968 : for use with the parallel technique. 1987: Cephalometric unit was used for the stabilization of the patient. 1993: Kwik bite and Intrax devices uses for orthodontic purposes. And Rinn xcp bitewing device was also used. 1996: Electronically Guided Alignment Device (EGAD) system was introduced. With this system a custom made occlusal biteblock held an aluminium wedge. The system measure deflection of a laser beam from a refernce mirror attached to a bracket bonded to the patient’s mirrorIntensifying screens are image receptor system used in combination with x ray film for all extra oral radiographic procedures such as OPG , ceph and skull radiography Types- Depending on light emitted Blue emitting visible light Green emitting visible light Consist of light sensitive phosphor crystals suspended in plastic material When the phosphors are struck by x ray photons they emit visible light that exposes the xray film. Most frequently used- calcium tungstate – Blue visible light Rare earth element- Advantages- 4 x more efficient Green emission spectrum hich allow easy and predictable alignment of the X- ray tube. Three types of film holders: Uncoupled positioning devices consisting of intraoral film holders, but no aiming devices; Semi rigidly coupled devices that have intra oral film holders and attached aiming rods with or without aiming rings; Rigidly coupled positioning devices where the intra oral film holder, beam aiming devices, and x-ray cone are all physically connected. hemostat with rubber biteblock held the film and a long metal rod . 1951: The snap a ray instrument was developed. 1962: The precision X-ray instrument was introduced. 1967: Rinn instruments for use with bisecting angle technique 1968 : for use with the parallel technique. 1987: Cephalometric unit was used for the stabilization of the patient. 1993: Kwik bite and Intrax devices uses for orthodontic purposes. And Rinn xcp bitewing device was also used. 1996: Electronically Guided Alignment Device (EGAD) system was introduced. With this system a custom made occlusal biteblock held an aluminium wedge. The system measure deflection of a laser beam from a refernce mirror attached to a bracket bonded to the patie
X ray films.pptxThe system measure deflection of a laser beam from a refernce mirror attached to a bracket bonded to the pa from NISHANT KUMAR
]]> 255 0 https://cdn.slidesharecdn.com/ss_thumbnails/xrayfilms-240222160137-b4b23603-thumbnail.jpg?width=120&height=120&fit=bounds presentation Black http://activitystrea.ms/schema/1.0/post http://activitystrea.ms/schema/1.0/posted 0 https://cdn.slidesharecdn.com/profile-photo-NishantKumar137-48x48.jpg?cb=1708619359 https://cdn.slidesharecdn.com/ss_thumbnails/handoutofantibioticsindentistry-240222165039-494ce72f-thumbnail.jpg?width=320&height=320&fit=bounds slideshow/handoutofantibioticsindentistryppt-kkk/266443660 Handout_of_Antibiotics... https://cdn.slidesharecdn.com/ss_thumbnails/xrayfilms-240222160137-b4b23603-thumbnail.jpg?width=320&height=320&fit=bounds slideshow/x-ray-filmspptxthe-system-measure-deflection-of-a-laser-beam-from-a-refernce-mirror-attached-to-a-bracket-bonded-to-the-pa/266443173 X ray films.pptxThe sy...