際際滷shows by User: VerinaIngram / http://www.slideshare.net/images/logo.gif 際際滷shows by User: VerinaIngram / Thu, 03 Apr 2025 10:00:02 GMT 際際滷Share feed for 際際滷shows by User: VerinaIngram Cora van Oosten CIFOR-ICRAF Wagenignen Landscape dialogue 19032025.pdf /slideshow/cora-van-oosten-cifor-icraf-wagenignen-landscape-dialogue-19032025-pdf/277475236 coravanoostencifor-icrafnlandscape190325-250403100003-732ac07b
Landscape approaches are seen as potential but complex strategies to achieve systemic change in the nexus of climate, biodiversity, food, water, energy and livelihoods. This transdisciplinary, integrated space-place based approach requires context specific strategies at multiple levels. International NGOs, mainly from conservation and development perspectives have increasingly initiated landscape approaches across the globe, in partnerships with governments, communities, knowledge organisations, private sector and other stakeholders in the last two decades. These experiences have led to different understandings of how landscape approaches should and could be implemented, definitions and perceptions of impacts of a landscape approach. Transformative change refers to fundamental, system-wide reorganisation across technological, economic and social factors, including paradigms, goals and values, recognising the depth, breadth and dynamics of system reorganisation. Depth refers to change that goes beyond addressing the symptoms of environmental change or their proximate drivers, such as new technologies, incentive systems or protected areas, to include changes to underlying drivers, including consumption preferences, beliefs, ideologies and social inequalities . Understanding the impacts and potential of landscape approaches means understanding and identifying factors in human society at both the individual and collective levels, including behavioural, social, cultural, economic, institutional, technical and technological dimensions, that may be leveraged to bring about transformative change at landscape scale, for different and multiple social, economic and environmental goals in the context of sustainable development. As part of the TC4BE project led by Wageningen UR in partnership with the Global Landscapes Forum (GLF) CIFOR- ICRAF, this one day dialogue brings together grounded experience from practitioners with academic evidence from researchers on the transformative potential of landscape approaches and its practice, and funding and policy implications. We will exchange on: 1. Whats working (or not) and via which change pathways with what impacts and outcomes, and for who? (Addressing questions of power, framing, hegemony, inclusiveness, legitimacy, equity, trade-offs, spillage and synergies) 2. How transformative are landscape approaches? 3. What understandings and lessons can we distil from our experiences and research? 4. Where are knowledge, research, competence and capacity gaps? TC4BE Wageningen UR Landscape dialogue 19 March 2025 ]]>
Landscape approaches are seen as potential but complex strategies to achieve systemic change in the nexus of climate, biodiversity, food, water, energy and livelihoods. This transdisciplinary, integrated space-place based approach requires context specific strategies at multiple levels. International NGOs, mainly from conservation and development perspectives have increasingly initiated landscape approaches across the globe, in partnerships with governments, communities, knowledge organisations, private sector and other stakeholders in the last two decades. These experiences have led to different understandings of how landscape approaches should and could be implemented, definitions and perceptions of impacts of a landscape approach. Transformative change refers to fundamental, system-wide reorganisation across technological, economic and social factors, including paradigms, goals and values, recognising the depth, breadth and dynamics of system reorganisation. Depth refers to change that goes beyond addressing the symptoms of environmental change or their proximate drivers, such as new technologies, incentive systems or protected areas, to include changes to underlying drivers, including consumption preferences, beliefs, ideologies and social inequalities . Understanding the impacts and potential of landscape approaches means understanding and identifying factors in human society at both the individual and collective levels, including behavioural, social, cultural, economic, institutional, technical and technological dimensions, that may be leveraged to bring about transformative change at landscape scale, for different and multiple social, economic and environmental goals in the context of sustainable development. As part of the TC4BE project led by Wageningen UR in partnership with the Global Landscapes Forum (GLF) CIFOR- ICRAF, this one day dialogue brings together grounded experience from practitioners with academic evidence from researchers on the transformative potential of landscape approaches and its practice, and funding and policy implications. We will exchange on: 1. Whats working (or not) and via which change pathways with what impacts and outcomes, and for who? (Addressing questions of power, framing, hegemony, inclusiveness, legitimacy, equity, trade-offs, spillage and synergies) 2. How transformative are landscape approaches? 3. What understandings and lessons can we distil from our experiences and research? 4. Where are knowledge, research, competence and capacity gaps? TC4BE Wageningen UR Landscape dialogue 19 March 2025 ]]> Thu, 03 Apr 2025 10:00:02 GMT /slideshow/cora-van-oosten-cifor-icraf-wagenignen-landscape-dialogue-19032025-pdf/277475236 VerinaIngram@slideshare.net(VerinaIngram) Cora van Oosten CIFOR-ICRAF Wagenignen Landscape dialogue 19032025.pdf VerinaIngram Landscape approaches are seen as potential but complex strategies to achieve systemic change in the nexus of climate, biodiversity, food, water, energy and livelihoods. This transdisciplinary, integrated space-place based approach requires context specific strategies at multiple levels. International NGOs, mainly from conservation and development perspectives have increasingly initiated landscape approaches across the globe, in partnerships with governments, communities, knowledge organisations, private sector and other stakeholders in the last two decades. These experiences have led to different understandings of how landscape approaches should and could be implemented, definitions and perceptions of impacts of a landscape approach. Transformative change refers to fundamental, system-wide reorganisation across technological, economic and social factors, including paradigms, goals and values, recognising the depth, breadth and dynamics of system reorganisation. Depth refers to change that goes beyond addressing the symptoms of environmental change or their proximate drivers, such as new technologies, incentive systems or protected areas, to include changes to underlying drivers, including consumption preferences, beliefs, ideologies and social inequalities . Understanding the impacts and potential of landscape approaches means understanding and identifying factors in human society at both the individual and collective levels, including behavioural, social, cultural, economic, institutional, technical and technological dimensions, that may be leveraged to bring about transformative change at landscape scale, for different and multiple social, economic and environmental goals in the context of sustainable development. As part of the TC4BE project led by Wageningen UR in partnership with the Global Landscapes Forum (GLF) CIFOR- ICRAF, this one day dialogue brings together grounded experience from practitioners with academic evidence from researchers on the transformative potential of landscape approaches and its practice, and funding and policy implications. We will exchange on: 1. Whats working (or not) and via which change pathways with what impacts and outcomes, and for who? (Addressing questions of power, framing, hegemony, inclusiveness, legitimacy, equity, trade-offs, spillage and synergies) 2. How transformative are landscape approaches? 3. What understandings and lessons can we distil from our experiences and research? 4. Where are knowledge, research, competence and capacity gaps? TC4BE Wageningen UR Landscape dialogue 19 March 2025 <img style="border:1px solid #C3E6D8;float:right;" alt="" src="https://cdn.slidesharecdn.com/ss_thumbnails/coravanoostencifor-icrafnlandscape190325-250403100003-732ac07b-thumbnail.jpg?width=120&amp;height=120&amp;fit=bounds" /><br> Landscape approaches are seen as potential but complex strategies to achieve systemic change in the nexus of climate, biodiversity, food, water, energy and livelihoods. This transdisciplinary, integrated space-place based approach requires context specific strategies at multiple levels. International NGOs, mainly from conservation and development perspectives have increasingly initiated landscape approaches across the globe, in partnerships with governments, communities, knowledge organisations, private sector and other stakeholders in the last two decades. These experiences have led to different understandings of how landscape approaches should and could be implemented, definitions and perceptions of impacts of a landscape approach. Transformative change refers to fundamental, system-wide reorganisation across technological, economic and social factors, including paradigms, goals and values, recognising the depth, breadth and dynamics of system reorganisation. Depth refers to change that goes beyond addressing the symptoms of environmental change or their proximate drivers, such as new technologies, incentive systems or protected areas, to include changes to underlying drivers, including consumption preferences, beliefs, ideologies and social inequalities . Understanding the impacts and potential of landscape approaches means understanding and identifying factors in human society at both the individual and collective levels, including behavioural, social, cultural, economic, institutional, technical and technological dimensions, that may be leveraged to bring about transformative change at landscape scale, for different and multiple social, economic and environmental goals in the context of sustainable development. As part of the TC4BE project led by Wageningen UR in partnership with the Global Landscapes Forum (GLF) CIFOR- ICRAF, this one day dialogue brings together grounded experience from practitioners with academic evidence from researchers on the transformative potential of landscape approaches and its practice, and funding and policy implications. We will exchange on: 1. Whats working (or not) and via which change pathways with what impacts and outcomes, and for who? (Addressing questions of power, framing, hegemony, inclusiveness, legitimacy, equity, trade-offs, spillage and synergies) 2. How transformative are landscape approaches? 3. What understandings and lessons can we distil from our experiences and research? 4. Where are knowledge, research, competence and capacity gaps? TC4BE Wageningen UR Landscape dialogue 19 March 2025
Cora van Oosten CIFOR-ICRAF Wagenignen Landscape dialogue 19032025.pdf from Verina Ingram
]]> 8 0 https://cdn.slidesharecdn.com/ss_thumbnails/coravanoostencifor-icrafnlandscape190325-250403100003-732ac07b-thumbnail.jpg?width=120&height=120&fit=bounds presentation Black http://activitystrea.ms/schema/1.0/post http://activitystrea.ms/schema/1.0/posted 0 James Reed CIFOR-ICRAF - Wageningen landscapes dialogue 19032025.pdf /slideshow/james-reed-cifor-icraf-wageningen-landscapes-dialogue-19032025-pdf/277402327 jamesreedcifor-icrafwageningenlandscapesdialogue19032025-250401161639-059416c3
Critical reflections on landscape approaches and principles, and evidence of effectiveness Landscape approaches are seen as potential but complex strategies to achieve systemic change in the nexus of climate, biodiversity, food, water, energy and livelihoods. This transdisciplinary, integrated space-place based approach requires context specific strategies at multiple levels. International NGOs, mainly from conservation and development perspectives have increasingly initiated landscape approaches across the globe, in partnerships with governments, communities, knowledge organisations, private sector and other stakeholders in the last two decades. These experiences have led to different understandings of how landscape approaches should and could be implemented, definitions and perceptions of impacts of a landscape approach. Transformative change refers to fundamental, system-wide reorganisation across technological, economic and social factors, including paradigms, goals and values, recognising the depth, breadth and dynamics of system reorganisation. Depth refers to change that goes beyond addressing the symptoms of environmental change or their proximate drivers, such as new technologies, incentive systems or protected areas, to include changes to underlying drivers, including consumption preferences, beliefs, ideologies and social inequalities . Understanding the impacts and potential of landscape approaches means understanding and identifying factors in human society at both the individual and collective levels, including behavioural, social, cultural, economic, institutional, technical and technological dimensions, that may be leveraged to bring about transformative change at landscape scale, for different and multiple social, economic and environmental goals in the context of sustainable development. As part of the TC4BE project led by Wageningen UR in partnership with the Global Landscapes Forum (GLF) CIFOR- ICRAF, this one day dialogue brings together grounded experience from practitioners with academic evidence from researchers on the transformative potential of landscape approaches and its practice, and funding and policy implications. We will exchange on: 1. Whats working (or not) and via which change pathways with what impacts and outcomes, and for who? (Addressing questions of power, framing, hegemony, inclusiveness, legitimacy, equity, trade-offs, spillage and synergies) 2. How transformative are landscape approaches? 3. What understandings and lessons can we distil from our experiences and research? 4. Where are knowledge, research, competence and capacity gaps? Wageningen UR 19032025 ]]>
Critical reflections on landscape approaches and principles, and evidence of effectiveness Landscape approaches are seen as potential but complex strategies to achieve systemic change in the nexus of climate, biodiversity, food, water, energy and livelihoods. This transdisciplinary, integrated space-place based approach requires context specific strategies at multiple levels. International NGOs, mainly from conservation and development perspectives have increasingly initiated landscape approaches across the globe, in partnerships with governments, communities, knowledge organisations, private sector and other stakeholders in the last two decades. These experiences have led to different understandings of how landscape approaches should and could be implemented, definitions and perceptions of impacts of a landscape approach. Transformative change refers to fundamental, system-wide reorganisation across technological, economic and social factors, including paradigms, goals and values, recognising the depth, breadth and dynamics of system reorganisation. Depth refers to change that goes beyond addressing the symptoms of environmental change or their proximate drivers, such as new technologies, incentive systems or protected areas, to include changes to underlying drivers, including consumption preferences, beliefs, ideologies and social inequalities . Understanding the impacts and potential of landscape approaches means understanding and identifying factors in human society at both the individual and collective levels, including behavioural, social, cultural, economic, institutional, technical and technological dimensions, that may be leveraged to bring about transformative change at landscape scale, for different and multiple social, economic and environmental goals in the context of sustainable development. As part of the TC4BE project led by Wageningen UR in partnership with the Global Landscapes Forum (GLF) CIFOR- ICRAF, this one day dialogue brings together grounded experience from practitioners with academic evidence from researchers on the transformative potential of landscape approaches and its practice, and funding and policy implications. We will exchange on: 1. Whats working (or not) and via which change pathways with what impacts and outcomes, and for who? (Addressing questions of power, framing, hegemony, inclusiveness, legitimacy, equity, trade-offs, spillage and synergies) 2. How transformative are landscape approaches? 3. What understandings and lessons can we distil from our experiences and research? 4. Where are knowledge, research, competence and capacity gaps? Wageningen UR 19032025 ]]> Tue, 01 Apr 2025 16:16:39 GMT /slideshow/james-reed-cifor-icraf-wageningen-landscapes-dialogue-19032025-pdf/277402327 VerinaIngram@slideshare.net(VerinaIngram) James Reed CIFOR-ICRAF - Wageningen landscapes dialogue 19032025.pdf VerinaIngram Critical reflections on landscape approaches and principles, and evidence of effectiveness Landscape approaches are seen as potential but complex strategies to achieve systemic change in the nexus of climate, biodiversity, food, water, energy and livelihoods. This transdisciplinary, integrated space-place based approach requires context specific strategies at multiple levels. International NGOs, mainly from conservation and development perspectives have increasingly initiated landscape approaches across the globe, in partnerships with governments, communities, knowledge organisations, private sector and other stakeholders in the last two decades. These experiences have led to different understandings of how landscape approaches should and could be implemented, definitions and perceptions of impacts of a landscape approach. Transformative change refers to fundamental, system-wide reorganisation across technological, economic and social factors, including paradigms, goals and values, recognising the depth, breadth and dynamics of system reorganisation. Depth refers to change that goes beyond addressing the symptoms of environmental change or their proximate drivers, such as new technologies, incentive systems or protected areas, to include changes to underlying drivers, including consumption preferences, beliefs, ideologies and social inequalities . Understanding the impacts and potential of landscape approaches means understanding and identifying factors in human society at both the individual and collective levels, including behavioural, social, cultural, economic, institutional, technical and technological dimensions, that may be leveraged to bring about transformative change at landscape scale, for different and multiple social, economic and environmental goals in the context of sustainable development. As part of the TC4BE project led by Wageningen UR in partnership with the Global Landscapes Forum (GLF) CIFOR- ICRAF, this one day dialogue brings together grounded experience from practitioners with academic evidence from researchers on the transformative potential of landscape approaches and its practice, and funding and policy implications. We will exchange on: 1. Whats working (or not) and via which change pathways with what impacts and outcomes, and for who? (Addressing questions of power, framing, hegemony, inclusiveness, legitimacy, equity, trade-offs, spillage and synergies) 2. How transformative are landscape approaches? 3. What understandings and lessons can we distil from our experiences and research? 4. Where are knowledge, research, competence and capacity gaps? Wageningen UR 19032025 <img style="border:1px solid #C3E6D8;float:right;" alt="" src="https://cdn.slidesharecdn.com/ss_thumbnails/jamesreedcifor-icrafwageningenlandscapesdialogue19032025-250401161639-059416c3-thumbnail.jpg?width=120&amp;height=120&amp;fit=bounds" /><br> Critical reflections on landscape approaches and principles, and evidence of effectiveness Landscape approaches are seen as potential but complex strategies to achieve systemic change in the nexus of climate, biodiversity, food, water, energy and livelihoods. This transdisciplinary, integrated space-place based approach requires context specific strategies at multiple levels. International NGOs, mainly from conservation and development perspectives have increasingly initiated landscape approaches across the globe, in partnerships with governments, communities, knowledge organisations, private sector and other stakeholders in the last two decades. These experiences have led to different understandings of how landscape approaches should and could be implemented, definitions and perceptions of impacts of a landscape approach. Transformative change refers to fundamental, system-wide reorganisation across technological, economic and social factors, including paradigms, goals and values, recognising the depth, breadth and dynamics of system reorganisation. Depth refers to change that goes beyond addressing the symptoms of environmental change or their proximate drivers, such as new technologies, incentive systems or protected areas, to include changes to underlying drivers, including consumption preferences, beliefs, ideologies and social inequalities . Understanding the impacts and potential of landscape approaches means understanding and identifying factors in human society at both the individual and collective levels, including behavioural, social, cultural, economic, institutional, technical and technological dimensions, that may be leveraged to bring about transformative change at landscape scale, for different and multiple social, economic and environmental goals in the context of sustainable development. As part of the TC4BE project led by Wageningen UR in partnership with the Global Landscapes Forum (GLF) CIFOR- ICRAF, this one day dialogue brings together grounded experience from practitioners with academic evidence from researchers on the transformative potential of landscape approaches and its practice, and funding and policy implications. We will exchange on: 1. Whats working (or not) and via which change pathways with what impacts and outcomes, and for who? (Addressing questions of power, framing, hegemony, inclusiveness, legitimacy, equity, trade-offs, spillage and synergies) 2. How transformative are landscape approaches? 3. What understandings and lessons can we distil from our experiences and research? 4. Where are knowledge, research, competence and capacity gaps? Wageningen UR 19032025
James Reed CIFOR-ICRAF - Wageningen landscapes dialogue 19032025.pdf from Verina Ingram
]]> 66 0 https://cdn.slidesharecdn.com/ss_thumbnails/jamesreedcifor-icrafwageningenlandscapesdialogue19032025-250401161639-059416c3-thumbnail.jpg?width=120&height=120&fit=bounds presentation Black http://activitystrea.ms/schema/1.0/post http://activitystrea.ms/schema/1.0/posted 0 Billy Wilcox ISEAL - Wageningen Landscape dialogue 19032025.pdf /slideshow/billy-wilcox-iseal-wageningen-landscape-dialogue-19032025-pdf/277402195 billywilcoxisealwageningenlandscapedialogue19032025-250401161320-3f5ff744
Aligning on the core criteria for mature landscape initiatives Landscape approaches are seen as potential but complex strategies to achieve systemic change in the nexus of climate, biodiversity, food, water, energy and livelihoods. This transdisciplinary, integrated space-place based approach requires context specific strategies at multiple levels. International NGOs, mainly from conservation and development perspectives have increasingly initiated landscape approaches across the globe, in partnerships with governments, communities, knowledge organisations, private sector and other stakeholders in the last two decades. These experiences have led to different understandings of how landscape approaches should and could be implemented, definitions and perceptions of impacts of a landscape approach. Transformative change refers to fundamental, system-wide reorganisation across technological, economic and social factors, including paradigms, goals and values, recognising the depth, breadth and dynamics of system reorganisation. Depth refers to change that goes beyond addressing the symptoms of environmental change or their proximate drivers, such as new technologies, incentive systems or protected areas, to include changes to underlying drivers, including consumption preferences, beliefs, ideologies and social inequalities . Understanding the impacts and potential of landscape approaches means understanding and identifying factors in human society at both the individual and collective levels, including behavioural, social, cultural, economic, institutional, technical and technological dimensions, that may be leveraged to bring about transformative change at landscape scale, for different and multiple social, economic and environmental goals in the context of sustainable development. As part of the TC4BE project led by Wageningen UR in partnership with the Global Landscapes Forum (GLF) CIFOR- ICRAF, this one day dialogue brings together grounded experience from practitioners with academic evidence from researchers on the transformative potential of landscape approaches and its practice, and funding and policy implications. We will exchange on: 1. Whats working (or not) and via which change pathways with what impacts and outcomes, and for who? (Addressing questions of power, framing, hegemony, inclusiveness, legitimacy, equity, trade-offs, spillage and synergies) 2. How transformative are landscape approaches? 3. What understandings and lessons can we distil from our experiences and research? 4. Where are knowledge, research, competence and capacity gaps? Wageningen UR 19032025 ]]>
Aligning on the core criteria for mature landscape initiatives Landscape approaches are seen as potential but complex strategies to achieve systemic change in the nexus of climate, biodiversity, food, water, energy and livelihoods. This transdisciplinary, integrated space-place based approach requires context specific strategies at multiple levels. International NGOs, mainly from conservation and development perspectives have increasingly initiated landscape approaches across the globe, in partnerships with governments, communities, knowledge organisations, private sector and other stakeholders in the last two decades. These experiences have led to different understandings of how landscape approaches should and could be implemented, definitions and perceptions of impacts of a landscape approach. Transformative change refers to fundamental, system-wide reorganisation across technological, economic and social factors, including paradigms, goals and values, recognising the depth, breadth and dynamics of system reorganisation. Depth refers to change that goes beyond addressing the symptoms of environmental change or their proximate drivers, such as new technologies, incentive systems or protected areas, to include changes to underlying drivers, including consumption preferences, beliefs, ideologies and social inequalities . Understanding the impacts and potential of landscape approaches means understanding and identifying factors in human society at both the individual and collective levels, including behavioural, social, cultural, economic, institutional, technical and technological dimensions, that may be leveraged to bring about transformative change at landscape scale, for different and multiple social, economic and environmental goals in the context of sustainable development. As part of the TC4BE project led by Wageningen UR in partnership with the Global Landscapes Forum (GLF) CIFOR- ICRAF, this one day dialogue brings together grounded experience from practitioners with academic evidence from researchers on the transformative potential of landscape approaches and its practice, and funding and policy implications. We will exchange on: 1. Whats working (or not) and via which change pathways with what impacts and outcomes, and for who? (Addressing questions of power, framing, hegemony, inclusiveness, legitimacy, equity, trade-offs, spillage and synergies) 2. How transformative are landscape approaches? 3. What understandings and lessons can we distil from our experiences and research? 4. Where are knowledge, research, competence and capacity gaps? Wageningen UR 19032025 ]]> Tue, 01 Apr 2025 16:13:20 GMT /slideshow/billy-wilcox-iseal-wageningen-landscape-dialogue-19032025-pdf/277402195 VerinaIngram@slideshare.net(VerinaIngram) Billy Wilcox ISEAL - Wageningen Landscape dialogue 19032025.pdf VerinaIngram Aligning on the core criteria for mature landscape initiatives Landscape approaches are seen as potential but complex strategies to achieve systemic change in the nexus of climate, biodiversity, food, water, energy and livelihoods. This transdisciplinary, integrated space-place based approach requires context specific strategies at multiple levels. International NGOs, mainly from conservation and development perspectives have increasingly initiated landscape approaches across the globe, in partnerships with governments, communities, knowledge organisations, private sector and other stakeholders in the last two decades. These experiences have led to different understandings of how landscape approaches should and could be implemented, definitions and perceptions of impacts of a landscape approach. Transformative change refers to fundamental, system-wide reorganisation across technological, economic and social factors, including paradigms, goals and values, recognising the depth, breadth and dynamics of system reorganisation. Depth refers to change that goes beyond addressing the symptoms of environmental change or their proximate drivers, such as new technologies, incentive systems or protected areas, to include changes to underlying drivers, including consumption preferences, beliefs, ideologies and social inequalities . Understanding the impacts and potential of landscape approaches means understanding and identifying factors in human society at both the individual and collective levels, including behavioural, social, cultural, economic, institutional, technical and technological dimensions, that may be leveraged to bring about transformative change at landscape scale, for different and multiple social, economic and environmental goals in the context of sustainable development. As part of the TC4BE project led by Wageningen UR in partnership with the Global Landscapes Forum (GLF) CIFOR- ICRAF, this one day dialogue brings together grounded experience from practitioners with academic evidence from researchers on the transformative potential of landscape approaches and its practice, and funding and policy implications. We will exchange on: 1. Whats working (or not) and via which change pathways with what impacts and outcomes, and for who? (Addressing questions of power, framing, hegemony, inclusiveness, legitimacy, equity, trade-offs, spillage and synergies) 2. How transformative are landscape approaches? 3. What understandings and lessons can we distil from our experiences and research? 4. Where are knowledge, research, competence and capacity gaps? Wageningen UR 19032025 <img style="border:1px solid #C3E6D8;float:right;" alt="" src="https://cdn.slidesharecdn.com/ss_thumbnails/billywilcoxisealwageningenlandscapedialogue19032025-250401161320-3f5ff744-thumbnail.jpg?width=120&amp;height=120&amp;fit=bounds" /><br> Aligning on the core criteria for mature landscape initiatives Landscape approaches are seen as potential but complex strategies to achieve systemic change in the nexus of climate, biodiversity, food, water, energy and livelihoods. This transdisciplinary, integrated space-place based approach requires context specific strategies at multiple levels. International NGOs, mainly from conservation and development perspectives have increasingly initiated landscape approaches across the globe, in partnerships with governments, communities, knowledge organisations, private sector and other stakeholders in the last two decades. These experiences have led to different understandings of how landscape approaches should and could be implemented, definitions and perceptions of impacts of a landscape approach. Transformative change refers to fundamental, system-wide reorganisation across technological, economic and social factors, including paradigms, goals and values, recognising the depth, breadth and dynamics of system reorganisation. Depth refers to change that goes beyond addressing the symptoms of environmental change or their proximate drivers, such as new technologies, incentive systems or protected areas, to include changes to underlying drivers, including consumption preferences, beliefs, ideologies and social inequalities . Understanding the impacts and potential of landscape approaches means understanding and identifying factors in human society at both the individual and collective levels, including behavioural, social, cultural, economic, institutional, technical and technological dimensions, that may be leveraged to bring about transformative change at landscape scale, for different and multiple social, economic and environmental goals in the context of sustainable development. As part of the TC4BE project led by Wageningen UR in partnership with the Global Landscapes Forum (GLF) CIFOR- ICRAF, this one day dialogue brings together grounded experience from practitioners with academic evidence from researchers on the transformative potential of landscape approaches and its practice, and funding and policy implications. We will exchange on: 1. Whats working (or not) and via which change pathways with what impacts and outcomes, and for who? (Addressing questions of power, framing, hegemony, inclusiveness, legitimacy, equity, trade-offs, spillage and synergies) 2. How transformative are landscape approaches? 3. What understandings and lessons can we distil from our experiences and research? 4. Where are knowledge, research, competence and capacity gaps? Wageningen UR 19032025
Billy Wilcox ISEAL - Wageningen Landscape dialogue 19032025.pdf from Verina Ingram
]]> 11 0 https://cdn.slidesharecdn.com/ss_thumbnails/billywilcoxisealwageningenlandscapedialogue19032025-250401161320-3f5ff744-thumbnail.jpg?width=120&height=120&fit=bounds presentation Black http://activitystrea.ms/schema/1.0/post http://activitystrea.ms/schema/1.0/posted 0 Katie Minderhoud PBL Landscape approach dialgoue 19032025.pdf /slideshow/katie-minderhoud-pbl-landscape-approach-dialgoue-19032025-pdf/277402127 katieminderhoudpbllandscapeapproachdialgoue19032025-250401161023-db9fe4a5
Typology for diversity in landscape approaches Preliminary findings PBL Landscape approaches are seen as potential but complex strategies to achieve systemic change in the nexus of climate, biodiversity, food, water, energy and livelihoods. This transdisciplinary, integrated space-place based approach requires context specific strategies at multiple levels. International NGOs, mainly from conservation and development perspectives have increasingly initiated landscape approaches across the globe, in partnerships with governments, communities, knowledge organisations, private sector and other stakeholders in the last two decades. These experiences have led to different understandings of how landscape approaches should and could be implemented, definitions and perceptions of impacts of a landscape approach. Transformative change refers to fundamental, system-wide reorganisation across technological, economic and social factors, including paradigms, goals and values, recognising the depth, breadth and dynamics of system reorganisation. Depth refers to change that goes beyond addressing the symptoms of environmental change or their proximate drivers, such as new technologies, incentive systems or protected areas, to include changes to underlying drivers, including consumption preferences, beliefs, ideologies and social inequalities . Understanding the impacts and potential of landscape approaches means understanding and identifying factors in human society at both the individual and collective levels, including behavioural, social, cultural, economic, institutional, technical and technological dimensions, that may be leveraged to bring about transformative change at landscape scale, for different and multiple social, economic and environmental goals in the context of sustainable development. As part of the TC4BE project led by Wageningen UR in partnership with the Global Landscapes Forum (GLF) CIFOR- ICRAF, this one day dialogue brings together grounded experience from practitioners with academic evidence from researchers on the transformative potential of landscape approaches and its practice, and funding and policy implications. We will exchange on: 1. Whats working (or not) and via which change pathways with what impacts and outcomes, and for who? (Addressing questions of power, framing, hegemony, inclusiveness, legitimacy, equity, trade-offs, spillage and synergies) 2. How transformative are landscape approaches? 3. What understandings and lessons can we distil from our experiences and research? 4. Where are knowledge, research, competence and capacity gaps? Wageningen 19 March 2025]]>
Typology for diversity in landscape approaches Preliminary findings PBL Landscape approaches are seen as potential but complex strategies to achieve systemic change in the nexus of climate, biodiversity, food, water, energy and livelihoods. This transdisciplinary, integrated space-place based approach requires context specific strategies at multiple levels. International NGOs, mainly from conservation and development perspectives have increasingly initiated landscape approaches across the globe, in partnerships with governments, communities, knowledge organisations, private sector and other stakeholders in the last two decades. These experiences have led to different understandings of how landscape approaches should and could be implemented, definitions and perceptions of impacts of a landscape approach. Transformative change refers to fundamental, system-wide reorganisation across technological, economic and social factors, including paradigms, goals and values, recognising the depth, breadth and dynamics of system reorganisation. Depth refers to change that goes beyond addressing the symptoms of environmental change or their proximate drivers, such as new technologies, incentive systems or protected areas, to include changes to underlying drivers, including consumption preferences, beliefs, ideologies and social inequalities . Understanding the impacts and potential of landscape approaches means understanding and identifying factors in human society at both the individual and collective levels, including behavioural, social, cultural, economic, institutional, technical and technological dimensions, that may be leveraged to bring about transformative change at landscape scale, for different and multiple social, economic and environmental goals in the context of sustainable development. As part of the TC4BE project led by Wageningen UR in partnership with the Global Landscapes Forum (GLF) CIFOR- ICRAF, this one day dialogue brings together grounded experience from practitioners with academic evidence from researchers on the transformative potential of landscape approaches and its practice, and funding and policy implications. We will exchange on: 1. Whats working (or not) and via which change pathways with what impacts and outcomes, and for who? (Addressing questions of power, framing, hegemony, inclusiveness, legitimacy, equity, trade-offs, spillage and synergies) 2. How transformative are landscape approaches? 3. What understandings and lessons can we distil from our experiences and research? 4. Where are knowledge, research, competence and capacity gaps? Wageningen 19 March 2025]]> Tue, 01 Apr 2025 16:10:23 GMT /slideshow/katie-minderhoud-pbl-landscape-approach-dialgoue-19032025-pdf/277402127 VerinaIngram@slideshare.net(VerinaIngram) Katie Minderhoud PBL Landscape approach dialgoue 19032025.pdf VerinaIngram Typology for diversity in landscape approaches Preliminary findings PBL Landscape approaches are seen as potential but complex strategies to achieve systemic change in the nexus of climate, biodiversity, food, water, energy and livelihoods. This transdisciplinary, integrated space-place based approach requires context specific strategies at multiple levels. International NGOs, mainly from conservation and development perspectives have increasingly initiated landscape approaches across the globe, in partnerships with governments, communities, knowledge organisations, private sector and other stakeholders in the last two decades. These experiences have led to different understandings of how landscape approaches should and could be implemented, definitions and perceptions of impacts of a landscape approach. Transformative change refers to fundamental, system-wide reorganisation across technological, economic and social factors, including paradigms, goals and values, recognising the depth, breadth and dynamics of system reorganisation. Depth refers to change that goes beyond addressing the symptoms of environmental change or their proximate drivers, such as new technologies, incentive systems or protected areas, to include changes to underlying drivers, including consumption preferences, beliefs, ideologies and social inequalities . Understanding the impacts and potential of landscape approaches means understanding and identifying factors in human society at both the individual and collective levels, including behavioural, social, cultural, economic, institutional, technical and technological dimensions, that may be leveraged to bring about transformative change at landscape scale, for different and multiple social, economic and environmental goals in the context of sustainable development. As part of the TC4BE project led by Wageningen UR in partnership with the Global Landscapes Forum (GLF) CIFOR- ICRAF, this one day dialogue brings together grounded experience from practitioners with academic evidence from researchers on the transformative potential of landscape approaches and its practice, and funding and policy implications. We will exchange on: 1. Whats working (or not) and via which change pathways with what impacts and outcomes, and for who? (Addressing questions of power, framing, hegemony, inclusiveness, legitimacy, equity, trade-offs, spillage and synergies) 2. How transformative are landscape approaches? 3. What understandings and lessons can we distil from our experiences and research? 4. Where are knowledge, research, competence and capacity gaps? Wageningen 19 March 2025 <img style="border:1px solid #C3E6D8;float:right;" alt="" src="https://cdn.slidesharecdn.com/ss_thumbnails/katieminderhoudpbllandscapeapproachdialgoue19032025-250401161023-db9fe4a5-thumbnail.jpg?width=120&amp;height=120&amp;fit=bounds" /><br> Typology for diversity in landscape approaches Preliminary findings PBL Landscape approaches are seen as potential but complex strategies to achieve systemic change in the nexus of climate, biodiversity, food, water, energy and livelihoods. This transdisciplinary, integrated space-place based approach requires context specific strategies at multiple levels. International NGOs, mainly from conservation and development perspectives have increasingly initiated landscape approaches across the globe, in partnerships with governments, communities, knowledge organisations, private sector and other stakeholders in the last two decades. These experiences have led to different understandings of how landscape approaches should and could be implemented, definitions and perceptions of impacts of a landscape approach. Transformative change refers to fundamental, system-wide reorganisation across technological, economic and social factors, including paradigms, goals and values, recognising the depth, breadth and dynamics of system reorganisation. Depth refers to change that goes beyond addressing the symptoms of environmental change or their proximate drivers, such as new technologies, incentive systems or protected areas, to include changes to underlying drivers, including consumption preferences, beliefs, ideologies and social inequalities . Understanding the impacts and potential of landscape approaches means understanding and identifying factors in human society at both the individual and collective levels, including behavioural, social, cultural, economic, institutional, technical and technological dimensions, that may be leveraged to bring about transformative change at landscape scale, for different and multiple social, economic and environmental goals in the context of sustainable development. As part of the TC4BE project led by Wageningen UR in partnership with the Global Landscapes Forum (GLF) CIFOR- ICRAF, this one day dialogue brings together grounded experience from practitioners with academic evidence from researchers on the transformative potential of landscape approaches and its practice, and funding and policy implications. We will exchange on: 1. Whats working (or not) and via which change pathways with what impacts and outcomes, and for who? (Addressing questions of power, framing, hegemony, inclusiveness, legitimacy, equity, trade-offs, spillage and synergies) 2. How transformative are landscape approaches? 3. What understandings and lessons can we distil from our experiences and research? 4. Where are knowledge, research, competence and capacity gaps? Wageningen 19 March 2025
Katie Minderhoud PBL Landscape approach dialgoue 19032025.pdf from Verina Ingram
]]> 62 0 https://cdn.slidesharecdn.com/ss_thumbnails/katieminderhoudpbllandscapeapproachdialgoue19032025-250401161023-db9fe4a5-thumbnail.jpg?width=120&height=120&fit=bounds presentation Black http://activitystrea.ms/schema/1.0/post http://activitystrea.ms/schema/1.0/posted 0 Violaine Berger IDH - Wageningen Landscape Approach dialogue 19032025.pdf /slideshow/violaine-berger-idh-wageningen-landscape-approach-dialogue-19032025-pdf/277402085 violainebergeridhwageningenlandscapeapproachdialogue19032025-250401160853-66a96c7c
IDH landscape programs environmental & social impacts - approaches and experiences from practice Landscape approaches are seen as potential but complex strategies to achieve systemic change in the nexus of climate, biodiversity, food, water, energy and livelihoods. This transdisciplinary, integrated space-place based approach requires context specific strategies at multiple levels. International NGOs, mainly from conservation and development perspectives have increasingly initiated landscape approaches across the globe, in partnerships with governments, communities, knowledge organisations, private sector and other stakeholders in the last two decades. These experiences have led to different understandings of how landscape approaches should and could be implemented, definitions and perceptions of impacts of a landscape approach. Transformative change refers to fundamental, system-wide reorganisation across technological, economic and social factors, including paradigms, goals and values, recognising the depth, breadth and dynamics of system reorganisation. Depth refers to change that goes beyond addressing the symptoms of environmental change or their proximate drivers, such as new technologies, incentive systems or protected areas, to include changes to underlying drivers, including consumption preferences, beliefs, ideologies and social inequalities . Understanding the impacts and potential of landscape approaches means understanding and identifying factors in human society at both the individual and collective levels, including behavioural, social, cultural, economic, institutional, technical and technological dimensions, that may be leveraged to bring about transformative change at landscape scale, for different and multiple social, economic and environmental goals in the context of sustainable development. As part of the TC4BE project led by Wageningen UR in partnership with the Global Landscapes Forum (GLF) CIFOR- ICRAF, this one day dialogue brings together grounded experience from practitioners with academic evidence from researchers on the transformative potential of landscape approaches and its practice, and funding and policy implications. We will exchange on: 1. Whats working (or not) and via which change pathways with what impacts and outcomes, and for who? (Addressing questions of power, framing, hegemony, inclusiveness, legitimacy, equity, trade-offs, spillage and synergies) 2. How transformative are landscape approaches? 3. What understandings and lessons can we distil from our experiences and research? 4. Where are knowledge, research, competence and capacity gaps? Wageningen 19 March 2025]]>
IDH landscape programs environmental & social impacts - approaches and experiences from practice Landscape approaches are seen as potential but complex strategies to achieve systemic change in the nexus of climate, biodiversity, food, water, energy and livelihoods. This transdisciplinary, integrated space-place based approach requires context specific strategies at multiple levels. International NGOs, mainly from conservation and development perspectives have increasingly initiated landscape approaches across the globe, in partnerships with governments, communities, knowledge organisations, private sector and other stakeholders in the last two decades. These experiences have led to different understandings of how landscape approaches should and could be implemented, definitions and perceptions of impacts of a landscape approach. Transformative change refers to fundamental, system-wide reorganisation across technological, economic and social factors, including paradigms, goals and values, recognising the depth, breadth and dynamics of system reorganisation. Depth refers to change that goes beyond addressing the symptoms of environmental change or their proximate drivers, such as new technologies, incentive systems or protected areas, to include changes to underlying drivers, including consumption preferences, beliefs, ideologies and social inequalities . Understanding the impacts and potential of landscape approaches means understanding and identifying factors in human society at both the individual and collective levels, including behavioural, social, cultural, economic, institutional, technical and technological dimensions, that may be leveraged to bring about transformative change at landscape scale, for different and multiple social, economic and environmental goals in the context of sustainable development. As part of the TC4BE project led by Wageningen UR in partnership with the Global Landscapes Forum (GLF) CIFOR- ICRAF, this one day dialogue brings together grounded experience from practitioners with academic evidence from researchers on the transformative potential of landscape approaches and its practice, and funding and policy implications. We will exchange on: 1. Whats working (or not) and via which change pathways with what impacts and outcomes, and for who? (Addressing questions of power, framing, hegemony, inclusiveness, legitimacy, equity, trade-offs, spillage and synergies) 2. How transformative are landscape approaches? 3. What understandings and lessons can we distil from our experiences and research? 4. Where are knowledge, research, competence and capacity gaps? Wageningen 19 March 2025]]> Tue, 01 Apr 2025 16:08:53 GMT /slideshow/violaine-berger-idh-wageningen-landscape-approach-dialogue-19032025-pdf/277402085 VerinaIngram@slideshare.net(VerinaIngram) Violaine Berger IDH - Wageningen Landscape Approach dialogue 19032025.pdf VerinaIngram IDH landscape programs environmental & social impacts - approaches and experiences from practice Landscape approaches are seen as potential but complex strategies to achieve systemic change in the nexus of climate, biodiversity, food, water, energy and livelihoods. This transdisciplinary, integrated space-place based approach requires context specific strategies at multiple levels. International NGOs, mainly from conservation and development perspectives have increasingly initiated landscape approaches across the globe, in partnerships with governments, communities, knowledge organisations, private sector and other stakeholders in the last two decades. These experiences have led to different understandings of how landscape approaches should and could be implemented, definitions and perceptions of impacts of a landscape approach. Transformative change refers to fundamental, system-wide reorganisation across technological, economic and social factors, including paradigms, goals and values, recognising the depth, breadth and dynamics of system reorganisation. Depth refers to change that goes beyond addressing the symptoms of environmental change or their proximate drivers, such as new technologies, incentive systems or protected areas, to include changes to underlying drivers, including consumption preferences, beliefs, ideologies and social inequalities . Understanding the impacts and potential of landscape approaches means understanding and identifying factors in human society at both the individual and collective levels, including behavioural, social, cultural, economic, institutional, technical and technological dimensions, that may be leveraged to bring about transformative change at landscape scale, for different and multiple social, economic and environmental goals in the context of sustainable development. As part of the TC4BE project led by Wageningen UR in partnership with the Global Landscapes Forum (GLF) CIFOR- ICRAF, this one day dialogue brings together grounded experience from practitioners with academic evidence from researchers on the transformative potential of landscape approaches and its practice, and funding and policy implications. We will exchange on: 1. Whats working (or not) and via which change pathways with what impacts and outcomes, and for who? (Addressing questions of power, framing, hegemony, inclusiveness, legitimacy, equity, trade-offs, spillage and synergies) 2. How transformative are landscape approaches? 3. What understandings and lessons can we distil from our experiences and research? 4. Where are knowledge, research, competence and capacity gaps? Wageningen 19 March 2025 <img style="border:1px solid #C3E6D8;float:right;" alt="" src="https://cdn.slidesharecdn.com/ss_thumbnails/violainebergeridhwageningenlandscapeapproachdialogue19032025-250401160853-66a96c7c-thumbnail.jpg?width=120&amp;height=120&amp;fit=bounds" /><br> IDH landscape programs environmental &amp; social impacts - approaches and experiences from practice Landscape approaches are seen as potential but complex strategies to achieve systemic change in the nexus of climate, biodiversity, food, water, energy and livelihoods. This transdisciplinary, integrated space-place based approach requires context specific strategies at multiple levels. International NGOs, mainly from conservation and development perspectives have increasingly initiated landscape approaches across the globe, in partnerships with governments, communities, knowledge organisations, private sector and other stakeholders in the last two decades. These experiences have led to different understandings of how landscape approaches should and could be implemented, definitions and perceptions of impacts of a landscape approach. Transformative change refers to fundamental, system-wide reorganisation across technological, economic and social factors, including paradigms, goals and values, recognising the depth, breadth and dynamics of system reorganisation. Depth refers to change that goes beyond addressing the symptoms of environmental change or their proximate drivers, such as new technologies, incentive systems or protected areas, to include changes to underlying drivers, including consumption preferences, beliefs, ideologies and social inequalities . Understanding the impacts and potential of landscape approaches means understanding and identifying factors in human society at both the individual and collective levels, including behavioural, social, cultural, economic, institutional, technical and technological dimensions, that may be leveraged to bring about transformative change at landscape scale, for different and multiple social, economic and environmental goals in the context of sustainable development. As part of the TC4BE project led by Wageningen UR in partnership with the Global Landscapes Forum (GLF) CIFOR- ICRAF, this one day dialogue brings together grounded experience from practitioners with academic evidence from researchers on the transformative potential of landscape approaches and its practice, and funding and policy implications. We will exchange on: 1. Whats working (or not) and via which change pathways with what impacts and outcomes, and for who? (Addressing questions of power, framing, hegemony, inclusiveness, legitimacy, equity, trade-offs, spillage and synergies) 2. How transformative are landscape approaches? 3. What understandings and lessons can we distil from our experiences and research? 4. Where are knowledge, research, competence and capacity gaps? Wageningen 19 March 2025
Violaine Berger IDH - Wageningen Landscape Approach dialogue 19032025.pdf from Verina Ingram
]]> 47 0 https://cdn.slidesharecdn.com/ss_thumbnails/violainebergeridhwageningenlandscapeapproachdialogue19032025-250401160853-66a96c7c-thumbnail.jpg?width=120&height=120&fit=bounds presentation Black http://activitystrea.ms/schema/1.0/post http://activitystrea.ms/schema/1.0/posted 0 Milena Engel & David Tsfonas Commonland - Wageningen Landscape approach dialogue 190325 /slideshow/milena-engel-david-tsfonas-commonland-wageningen-landscape-approach-dialogue-190325/277401956 milenaengeldavidtsfonascommonlandwageningenlandscapeapproachdialogu190325-250401160524-e6d6c534
Bridging Knowledge Gaps in Landscape Restoration: Commonlands Evidence Gap Map Approach Landscape approaches are seen as potential but complex strategies to achieve systemic change in the nexus of climate, biodiversity, food, water, energy and livelihoods. This transdisciplinary, integrated space-place based approach requires context specific strategies at multiple levels. International NGOs, mainly from conservation and development perspectives have increasingly initiated landscape approaches across the globe, in partnerships with governments, communities, knowledge organisations, private sector and other stakeholders in the last two decades. These experiences have led to different understandings of how landscape approaches should and could be implemented, definitions and perceptions of impacts of a landscape approach. Transformative change refers to fundamental, system-wide reorganisation across technological, economic and social factors, including paradigms, goals and values, recognising the depth, breadth and dynamics of system reorganisation. Depth refers to change that goes beyond addressing the symptoms of environmental change or their proximate drivers, such as new technologies, incentive systems or protected areas, to include changes to underlying drivers, including consumption preferences, beliefs, ideologies and social inequalities . Understanding the impacts and potential of landscape approaches means understanding and identifying factors in human society at both the individual and collective levels, including behavioural, social, cultural, economic, institutional, technical and technological dimensions, that may be leveraged to bring about transformative change at landscape scale, for different and multiple social, economic and environmental goals in the context of sustainable development. As part of the TC4BE project led by Wageningen UR in partnership with the Global Landscapes Forum (GLF) CIFOR- ICRAF, this one day dialogue brings together grounded experience from practitioners with academic evidence from researchers on the transformative potential of landscape approaches and its practice, and funding and policy implications. We will exchange on: 1. Whats working (or not) and via which change pathways with what impacts and outcomes, and for who? (Addressing questions of power, framing, hegemony, inclusiveness, legitimacy, equity, trade-offs, spillage and synergies) 2. How transformative are landscape approaches? 3. What understandings and lessons can we distil from our experiences and research? 4. Where are knowledge, research, competence and capacity gaps? ]]>
Bridging Knowledge Gaps in Landscape Restoration: Commonlands Evidence Gap Map Approach Landscape approaches are seen as potential but complex strategies to achieve systemic change in the nexus of climate, biodiversity, food, water, energy and livelihoods. This transdisciplinary, integrated space-place based approach requires context specific strategies at multiple levels. International NGOs, mainly from conservation and development perspectives have increasingly initiated landscape approaches across the globe, in partnerships with governments, communities, knowledge organisations, private sector and other stakeholders in the last two decades. These experiences have led to different understandings of how landscape approaches should and could be implemented, definitions and perceptions of impacts of a landscape approach. Transformative change refers to fundamental, system-wide reorganisation across technological, economic and social factors, including paradigms, goals and values, recognising the depth, breadth and dynamics of system reorganisation. Depth refers to change that goes beyond addressing the symptoms of environmental change or their proximate drivers, such as new technologies, incentive systems or protected areas, to include changes to underlying drivers, including consumption preferences, beliefs, ideologies and social inequalities . Understanding the impacts and potential of landscape approaches means understanding and identifying factors in human society at both the individual and collective levels, including behavioural, social, cultural, economic, institutional, technical and technological dimensions, that may be leveraged to bring about transformative change at landscape scale, for different and multiple social, economic and environmental goals in the context of sustainable development. As part of the TC4BE project led by Wageningen UR in partnership with the Global Landscapes Forum (GLF) CIFOR- ICRAF, this one day dialogue brings together grounded experience from practitioners with academic evidence from researchers on the transformative potential of landscape approaches and its practice, and funding and policy implications. We will exchange on: 1. Whats working (or not) and via which change pathways with what impacts and outcomes, and for who? (Addressing questions of power, framing, hegemony, inclusiveness, legitimacy, equity, trade-offs, spillage and synergies) 2. How transformative are landscape approaches? 3. What understandings and lessons can we distil from our experiences and research? 4. Where are knowledge, research, competence and capacity gaps? ]]> Tue, 01 Apr 2025 16:05:24 GMT /slideshow/milena-engel-david-tsfonas-commonland-wageningen-landscape-approach-dialogue-190325/277401956 VerinaIngram@slideshare.net(VerinaIngram) Milena Engel & David Tsfonas Commonland - Wageningen Landscape approach dialogue 190325 VerinaIngram Bridging Knowledge Gaps in Landscape Restoration: Commonlands Evidence Gap Map Approach Landscape approaches are seen as potential but complex strategies to achieve systemic change in the nexus of climate, biodiversity, food, water, energy and livelihoods. This transdisciplinary, integrated space-place based approach requires context specific strategies at multiple levels. International NGOs, mainly from conservation and development perspectives have increasingly initiated landscape approaches across the globe, in partnerships with governments, communities, knowledge organisations, private sector and other stakeholders in the last two decades. These experiences have led to different understandings of how landscape approaches should and could be implemented, definitions and perceptions of impacts of a landscape approach. Transformative change refers to fundamental, system-wide reorganisation across technological, economic and social factors, including paradigms, goals and values, recognising the depth, breadth and dynamics of system reorganisation. Depth refers to change that goes beyond addressing the symptoms of environmental change or their proximate drivers, such as new technologies, incentive systems or protected areas, to include changes to underlying drivers, including consumption preferences, beliefs, ideologies and social inequalities . Understanding the impacts and potential of landscape approaches means understanding and identifying factors in human society at both the individual and collective levels, including behavioural, social, cultural, economic, institutional, technical and technological dimensions, that may be leveraged to bring about transformative change at landscape scale, for different and multiple social, economic and environmental goals in the context of sustainable development. As part of the TC4BE project led by Wageningen UR in partnership with the Global Landscapes Forum (GLF) CIFOR- ICRAF, this one day dialogue brings together grounded experience from practitioners with academic evidence from researchers on the transformative potential of landscape approaches and its practice, and funding and policy implications. We will exchange on: 1. Whats working (or not) and via which change pathways with what impacts and outcomes, and for who? (Addressing questions of power, framing, hegemony, inclusiveness, legitimacy, equity, trade-offs, spillage and synergies) 2. How transformative are landscape approaches? 3. What understandings and lessons can we distil from our experiences and research? 4. Where are knowledge, research, competence and capacity gaps? <img style="border:1px solid #C3E6D8;float:right;" alt="" src="https://cdn.slidesharecdn.com/ss_thumbnails/milenaengeldavidtsfonascommonlandwageningenlandscapeapproachdialogu190325-250401160524-e6d6c534-thumbnail.jpg?width=120&amp;height=120&amp;fit=bounds" /><br> Bridging Knowledge Gaps in Landscape Restoration: Commonlands Evidence Gap Map Approach Landscape approaches are seen as potential but complex strategies to achieve systemic change in the nexus of climate, biodiversity, food, water, energy and livelihoods. This transdisciplinary, integrated space-place based approach requires context specific strategies at multiple levels. International NGOs, mainly from conservation and development perspectives have increasingly initiated landscape approaches across the globe, in partnerships with governments, communities, knowledge organisations, private sector and other stakeholders in the last two decades. These experiences have led to different understandings of how landscape approaches should and could be implemented, definitions and perceptions of impacts of a landscape approach. Transformative change refers to fundamental, system-wide reorganisation across technological, economic and social factors, including paradigms, goals and values, recognising the depth, breadth and dynamics of system reorganisation. Depth refers to change that goes beyond addressing the symptoms of environmental change or their proximate drivers, such as new technologies, incentive systems or protected areas, to include changes to underlying drivers, including consumption preferences, beliefs, ideologies and social inequalities . Understanding the impacts and potential of landscape approaches means understanding and identifying factors in human society at both the individual and collective levels, including behavioural, social, cultural, economic, institutional, technical and technological dimensions, that may be leveraged to bring about transformative change at landscape scale, for different and multiple social, economic and environmental goals in the context of sustainable development. As part of the TC4BE project led by Wageningen UR in partnership with the Global Landscapes Forum (GLF) CIFOR- ICRAF, this one day dialogue brings together grounded experience from practitioners with academic evidence from researchers on the transformative potential of landscape approaches and its practice, and funding and policy implications. We will exchange on: 1. Whats working (or not) and via which change pathways with what impacts and outcomes, and for who? (Addressing questions of power, framing, hegemony, inclusiveness, legitimacy, equity, trade-offs, spillage and synergies) 2. How transformative are landscape approaches? 3. What understandings and lessons can we distil from our experiences and research? 4. Where are knowledge, research, competence and capacity gaps?
Milena Engel & David Tsfonas Commonland - Wageningen Landscape approach dialogue 190325 from Verina Ingram
]]> 45 0 https://cdn.slidesharecdn.com/ss_thumbnails/milenaengeldavidtsfonascommonlandwageningenlandscapeapproachdialogu190325-250401160524-e6d6c534-thumbnail.jpg?width=120&height=120&fit=bounds presentation Black http://activitystrea.ms/schema/1.0/post http://activitystrea.ms/schema/1.0/posted 0 Verina Ingram TCforBE Wageningen Landscape dialogue 19032025 /slideshow/verina-ingram-tcforbe-wageningen-landscape-dialogue-19032025/277401950 verinaingrametaltcforbewageningenlandscapedialogue19032025-250401160519-34366219
Introducing transformative change and landscape approaches. Landscape approaches are seen as potential but complex strategies to achieve systemic change in the nexus of climate, biodiversity, food, water, energy and livelihoods. This transdisciplinary, integrated space-place based approach requires context specific strategies at multiple levels. International NGOs, mainly from conservation and development perspectives have increasingly initiated landscape approaches across the globe, in partnerships with governments, communities, knowledge organisations, private sector and other stakeholders in the last two decades. These experiences have led to different understandings of how landscape approaches should and could be implemented, definitions and perceptions of impacts of a landscape approach. Transformative change refers to fundamental, system-wide reorganisation across technological, economic and social factors, including paradigms, goals and values, recognising the depth, breadth and dynamics of system reorganisation. Depth refers to change that goes beyond addressing the symptoms of environmental change or their proximate drivers, such as new technologies, incentive systems or protected areas, to include changes to underlying drivers, including consumption preferences, beliefs, ideologies and social inequalities . Understanding the impacts and potential of landscape approaches means understanding and identifying factors in human society at both the individual and collective levels, including behavioural, social, cultural, economic, institutional, technical and technological dimensions, that may be leveraged to bring about transformative change at landscape scale, for different and multiple social, economic and environmental goals in the context of sustainable development. As part of the TC4BE project led by Wageningen UR in partnership with the Global Landscapes Forum (GLF) CIFOR- ICRAF, this one day dialogue brings together grounded experience from practitioners with academic evidence from researchers on the transformative potential of landscape approaches and its practice, and funding and policy implications. We will exchange on: 1. Whats working (or not) and via which change pathways with what impacts and outcomes, and for who? (Addressing questions of power, framing, hegemony, inclusiveness, legitimacy, equity, trade-offs, spillage and synergies) 2. How transformative are landscape approaches? 3. What understandings and lessons can we distil from our experiences and research? 4. Where are knowledge, research, competence and capacity gaps? Wageningen 19 March 2025]]>
Introducing transformative change and landscape approaches. Landscape approaches are seen as potential but complex strategies to achieve systemic change in the nexus of climate, biodiversity, food, water, energy and livelihoods. This transdisciplinary, integrated space-place based approach requires context specific strategies at multiple levels. International NGOs, mainly from conservation and development perspectives have increasingly initiated landscape approaches across the globe, in partnerships with governments, communities, knowledge organisations, private sector and other stakeholders in the last two decades. These experiences have led to different understandings of how landscape approaches should and could be implemented, definitions and perceptions of impacts of a landscape approach. Transformative change refers to fundamental, system-wide reorganisation across technological, economic and social factors, including paradigms, goals and values, recognising the depth, breadth and dynamics of system reorganisation. Depth refers to change that goes beyond addressing the symptoms of environmental change or their proximate drivers, such as new technologies, incentive systems or protected areas, to include changes to underlying drivers, including consumption preferences, beliefs, ideologies and social inequalities . Understanding the impacts and potential of landscape approaches means understanding and identifying factors in human society at both the individual and collective levels, including behavioural, social, cultural, economic, institutional, technical and technological dimensions, that may be leveraged to bring about transformative change at landscape scale, for different and multiple social, economic and environmental goals in the context of sustainable development. As part of the TC4BE project led by Wageningen UR in partnership with the Global Landscapes Forum (GLF) CIFOR- ICRAF, this one day dialogue brings together grounded experience from practitioners with academic evidence from researchers on the transformative potential of landscape approaches and its practice, and funding and policy implications. We will exchange on: 1. Whats working (or not) and via which change pathways with what impacts and outcomes, and for who? (Addressing questions of power, framing, hegemony, inclusiveness, legitimacy, equity, trade-offs, spillage and synergies) 2. How transformative are landscape approaches? 3. What understandings and lessons can we distil from our experiences and research? 4. Where are knowledge, research, competence and capacity gaps? Wageningen 19 March 2025]]> Tue, 01 Apr 2025 16:05:18 GMT /slideshow/verina-ingram-tcforbe-wageningen-landscape-dialogue-19032025/277401950 VerinaIngram@slideshare.net(VerinaIngram) Verina Ingram TCforBE Wageningen Landscape dialogue 19032025 VerinaIngram Introducing transformative change and landscape approaches. Landscape approaches are seen as potential but complex strategies to achieve systemic change in the nexus of climate, biodiversity, food, water, energy and livelihoods. This transdisciplinary, integrated space-place based approach requires context specific strategies at multiple levels. International NGOs, mainly from conservation and development perspectives have increasingly initiated landscape approaches across the globe, in partnerships with governments, communities, knowledge organisations, private sector and other stakeholders in the last two decades. These experiences have led to different understandings of how landscape approaches should and could be implemented, definitions and perceptions of impacts of a landscape approach. Transformative change refers to fundamental, system-wide reorganisation across technological, economic and social factors, including paradigms, goals and values, recognising the depth, breadth and dynamics of system reorganisation. Depth refers to change that goes beyond addressing the symptoms of environmental change or their proximate drivers, such as new technologies, incentive systems or protected areas, to include changes to underlying drivers, including consumption preferences, beliefs, ideologies and social inequalities . Understanding the impacts and potential of landscape approaches means understanding and identifying factors in human society at both the individual and collective levels, including behavioural, social, cultural, economic, institutional, technical and technological dimensions, that may be leveraged to bring about transformative change at landscape scale, for different and multiple social, economic and environmental goals in the context of sustainable development. As part of the TC4BE project led by Wageningen UR in partnership with the Global Landscapes Forum (GLF) CIFOR- ICRAF, this one day dialogue brings together grounded experience from practitioners with academic evidence from researchers on the transformative potential of landscape approaches and its practice, and funding and policy implications. We will exchange on: 1. Whats working (or not) and via which change pathways with what impacts and outcomes, and for who? (Addressing questions of power, framing, hegemony, inclusiveness, legitimacy, equity, trade-offs, spillage and synergies) 2. How transformative are landscape approaches? 3. What understandings and lessons can we distil from our experiences and research? 4. Where are knowledge, research, competence and capacity gaps? Wageningen 19 March 2025 <img style="border:1px solid #C3E6D8;float:right;" alt="" src="https://cdn.slidesharecdn.com/ss_thumbnails/verinaingrametaltcforbewageningenlandscapedialogue19032025-250401160519-34366219-thumbnail.jpg?width=120&amp;height=120&amp;fit=bounds" /><br> Introducing transformative change and landscape approaches. Landscape approaches are seen as potential but complex strategies to achieve systemic change in the nexus of climate, biodiversity, food, water, energy and livelihoods. This transdisciplinary, integrated space-place based approach requires context specific strategies at multiple levels. International NGOs, mainly from conservation and development perspectives have increasingly initiated landscape approaches across the globe, in partnerships with governments, communities, knowledge organisations, private sector and other stakeholders in the last two decades. These experiences have led to different understandings of how landscape approaches should and could be implemented, definitions and perceptions of impacts of a landscape approach. Transformative change refers to fundamental, system-wide reorganisation across technological, economic and social factors, including paradigms, goals and values, recognising the depth, breadth and dynamics of system reorganisation. Depth refers to change that goes beyond addressing the symptoms of environmental change or their proximate drivers, such as new technologies, incentive systems or protected areas, to include changes to underlying drivers, including consumption preferences, beliefs, ideologies and social inequalities . Understanding the impacts and potential of landscape approaches means understanding and identifying factors in human society at both the individual and collective levels, including behavioural, social, cultural, economic, institutional, technical and technological dimensions, that may be leveraged to bring about transformative change at landscape scale, for different and multiple social, economic and environmental goals in the context of sustainable development. As part of the TC4BE project led by Wageningen UR in partnership with the Global Landscapes Forum (GLF) CIFOR- ICRAF, this one day dialogue brings together grounded experience from practitioners with academic evidence from researchers on the transformative potential of landscape approaches and its practice, and funding and policy implications. We will exchange on: 1. Whats working (or not) and via which change pathways with what impacts and outcomes, and for who? (Addressing questions of power, framing, hegemony, inclusiveness, legitimacy, equity, trade-offs, spillage and synergies) 2. How transformative are landscape approaches? 3. What understandings and lessons can we distil from our experiences and research? 4. Where are knowledge, research, competence and capacity gaps? Wageningen 19 March 2025
Verina Ingram TCforBE Wageningen Landscape dialogue 19032025 from Verina Ingram
]]> 50 0 https://cdn.slidesharecdn.com/ss_thumbnails/verinaingrametaltcforbewageningenlandscapedialogue19032025-250401160519-34366219-thumbnail.jpg?width=120&height=120&fit=bounds presentation Black http://activitystrea.ms/schema/1.0/post http://activitystrea.ms/schema/1.0/posted 0 Bush mango use and trade in Cameroon - sustainability, equity and development? /slideshow/bush-mango-use-and-trade-in-cameroon-sustainability-equity-and-development/270616222 bushmangonwfpconferenceingram2023-240730110117-8b38c41b
Verina Ingram, Nick van Alphen, Sarah Laird, Abdon Awono, Robert Nkuinkeu, Ruksan Bose, Louis Ndumbe Bush mango use and trade in Cameroon - sustainability, equity and development? The 5th International Non-Wood Forest Products Symposium, September 27-28 2023 Bartin University ]]>
Verina Ingram, Nick van Alphen, Sarah Laird, Abdon Awono, Robert Nkuinkeu, Ruksan Bose, Louis Ndumbe Bush mango use and trade in Cameroon - sustainability, equity and development? The 5th International Non-Wood Forest Products Symposium, September 27-28 2023 Bartin University ]]> Tue, 30 Jul 2024 11:01:16 GMT /slideshow/bush-mango-use-and-trade-in-cameroon-sustainability-equity-and-development/270616222 VerinaIngram@slideshare.net(VerinaIngram) Bush mango use and trade in Cameroon - sustainability, equity and development? VerinaIngram Verina Ingram, Nick van Alphen, Sarah Laird, Abdon Awono, Robert Nkuinkeu, Ruksan Bose, Louis Ndumbe Bush mango use and trade in Cameroon - sustainability, equity and development? The 5th International Non-Wood Forest Products Symposium, September 27-28 2023 Bartin University <img style="border:1px solid #C3E6D8;float:right;" alt="" src="https://cdn.slidesharecdn.com/ss_thumbnails/bushmangonwfpconferenceingram2023-240730110117-8b38c41b-thumbnail.jpg?width=120&amp;height=120&amp;fit=bounds" /><br> Verina Ingram, Nick van Alphen, Sarah Laird, Abdon Awono, Robert Nkuinkeu, Ruksan Bose, Louis Ndumbe Bush mango use and trade in Cameroon - sustainability, equity and development? The 5th International Non-Wood Forest Products Symposium, September 27-28 2023 Bartin University
Bush mango use and trade in Cameroon - sustainability, equity and development? from Verina Ingram
]]> 10 0 https://cdn.slidesharecdn.com/ss_thumbnails/bushmangonwfpconferenceingram2023-240730110117-8b38c41b-thumbnail.jpg?width=120&height=120&fit=bounds presentation Black http://activitystrea.ms/schema/1.0/post http://activitystrea.ms/schema/1.0/posted 0 25 years of non-timber forest product value chain and livelihoods interventions: Experiences, impacts and lessons from Cameroon /slideshow/25-years-of-non-timber-forest-product-value-chain-and-livelihoods-interventions-experiences-impacts-and-lessons-from-cameroon/270616129 ingramiufrot2-240730105840-794dd29d
25 years of non-timber forest product value chain and livelihoods interventions: Experiences, impacts and lessons from Cameroon T2.15 Innovations to support sustainability in non-timber forest products value chains Verina Ingram1 , Rene Kaam1, 2, Louis Ndumbe3, Abdon Awono4, Divine Tita Foundjem4, Michele Danleu5 1 Wageningen University & Research 2 INBAR 3 University of Buea 4 CIFOR-ICRAF 5 GIZ Abstract Cameroon represents ''Africa in miniature'' with high levels of forest cover but increasing rates of deforestation, and variable but common use of forest products for multiple subsistence and commercial uses. Despite the national development situation moving from low to medium level development status, rural poverty remains high, particularly among marginalized societal and ethnic groups, and is associated with forest product use, dependence, commercialisation and social-ecological resilience. Over 25 years of development, conservation and research interventions have sought to support sustainable commercialization, value chain development, alternative livelihoods, cultivation and domestication of non-timber forest products (NTFPs)in Cameroon. Over this period, narratives on NTFPs, value chain development, rural development, forest-people relationships, justifications of interventions and impact logics, measurements of impacts using top-down or science based-knowledge - have changed little. Indicators of the effectiveness of interventions, such as changes in prices, profits, value adding, harvesting practices, cultivation rates, resource availability, empowerment, deforestation and conservation have been mixed. This raises questions of what have been the legacy and impacts of such interventions in the long term? What has changed, for who and why? Whats worked and not worked? What lessons can be learnt from evaluating successes and failures of intervention concerning NTFPs on livelihoods and ecosystems looking at the (un)expected outcomes and impacts? and, what do these lessons imply for future policies, projects, programs and interventions? This article examines the evidence by taking a long-term view identifying 10 projects/programs, and then involving the beneficiaries and implementers in evaluating long-term socio-economic, political (governance and policy) and ecological outcomes and impacts of these interventions. The discussion is conceptualized in terms of Sustainable Livelihoods Approach and Social-Ecological systems thinking (i.e. impacts on both livelihoods and -ecosystems of the landscapes where these products originate from) and taking a value chain approach to look at direct (and indirect) actors in NTFP value chains and interventions. Implications for scientific research, local knowledge and practices, and policy will be presented. ]]>
25 years of non-timber forest product value chain and livelihoods interventions: Experiences, impacts and lessons from Cameroon T2.15 Innovations to support sustainability in non-timber forest products value chains Verina Ingram1 , Rene Kaam1, 2, Louis Ndumbe3, Abdon Awono4, Divine Tita Foundjem4, Michele Danleu5 1 Wageningen University & Research 2 INBAR 3 University of Buea 4 CIFOR-ICRAF 5 GIZ Abstract Cameroon represents ''Africa in miniature'' with high levels of forest cover but increasing rates of deforestation, and variable but common use of forest products for multiple subsistence and commercial uses. Despite the national development situation moving from low to medium level development status, rural poverty remains high, particularly among marginalized societal and ethnic groups, and is associated with forest product use, dependence, commercialisation and social-ecological resilience. Over 25 years of development, conservation and research interventions have sought to support sustainable commercialization, value chain development, alternative livelihoods, cultivation and domestication of non-timber forest products (NTFPs)in Cameroon. Over this period, narratives on NTFPs, value chain development, rural development, forest-people relationships, justifications of interventions and impact logics, measurements of impacts using top-down or science based-knowledge - have changed little. Indicators of the effectiveness of interventions, such as changes in prices, profits, value adding, harvesting practices, cultivation rates, resource availability, empowerment, deforestation and conservation have been mixed. This raises questions of what have been the legacy and impacts of such interventions in the long term? What has changed, for who and why? Whats worked and not worked? What lessons can be learnt from evaluating successes and failures of intervention concerning NTFPs on livelihoods and ecosystems looking at the (un)expected outcomes and impacts? and, what do these lessons imply for future policies, projects, programs and interventions? This article examines the evidence by taking a long-term view identifying 10 projects/programs, and then involving the beneficiaries and implementers in evaluating long-term socio-economic, political (governance and policy) and ecological outcomes and impacts of these interventions. The discussion is conceptualized in terms of Sustainable Livelihoods Approach and Social-Ecological systems thinking (i.e. impacts on both livelihoods and -ecosystems of the landscapes where these products originate from) and taking a value chain approach to look at direct (and indirect) actors in NTFP value chains and interventions. Implications for scientific research, local knowledge and practices, and policy will be presented. ]]> Tue, 30 Jul 2024 10:58:40 GMT /slideshow/25-years-of-non-timber-forest-product-value-chain-and-livelihoods-interventions-experiences-impacts-and-lessons-from-cameroon/270616129 VerinaIngram@slideshare.net(VerinaIngram) 25 years of non-timber forest product value chain and livelihoods interventions: Experiences, impacts and lessons from Cameroon VerinaIngram 25 years of non-timber forest product value chain and livelihoods interventions: Experiences, impacts and lessons from Cameroon T2.15 Innovations to support sustainability in non-timber forest products value chains Verina Ingram1 , Rene Kaam1, 2, Louis Ndumbe3, Abdon Awono4, Divine Tita Foundjem4, Michele Danleu5 1 Wageningen University & Research 2 INBAR 3 University of Buea 4 CIFOR-ICRAF 5 GIZ Abstract Cameroon represents ''Africa in miniature'' with high levels of forest cover but increasing rates of deforestation, and variable but common use of forest products for multiple subsistence and commercial uses. Despite the national development situation moving from low to medium level development status, rural poverty remains high, particularly among marginalized societal and ethnic groups, and is associated with forest product use, dependence, commercialisation and social-ecological resilience. Over 25 years of development, conservation and research interventions have sought to support sustainable commercialization, value chain development, alternative livelihoods, cultivation and domestication of non-timber forest products (NTFPs)in Cameroon. Over this period, narratives on NTFPs, value chain development, rural development, forest-people relationships, justifications of interventions and impact logics, measurements of impacts using top-down or science based-knowledge - have changed little. Indicators of the effectiveness of interventions, such as changes in prices, profits, value adding, harvesting practices, cultivation rates, resource availability, empowerment, deforestation and conservation have been mixed. This raises questions of what have been the legacy and impacts of such interventions in the long term? What has changed, for who and why? Whats worked and not worked? What lessons can be learnt from evaluating successes and failures of intervention concerning NTFPs on livelihoods and ecosystems looking at the (un)expected outcomes and impacts? and, what do these lessons imply for future policies, projects, programs and interventions? This article examines the evidence by taking a long-term view identifying 10 projects/programs, and then involving the beneficiaries and implementers in evaluating long-term socio-economic, political (governance and policy) and ecological outcomes and impacts of these interventions. The discussion is conceptualized in terms of Sustainable Livelihoods Approach and Social-Ecological systems thinking (i.e. impacts on both livelihoods and -ecosystems of the landscapes where these products originate from) and taking a value chain approach to look at direct (and indirect) actors in NTFP value chains and interventions. Implications for scientific research, local knowledge and practices, and policy will be presented. <img style="border:1px solid #C3E6D8;float:right;" alt="" src="https://cdn.slidesharecdn.com/ss_thumbnails/ingramiufrot2-240730105840-794dd29d-thumbnail.jpg?width=120&amp;height=120&amp;fit=bounds" /><br> 25 years of non-timber forest product value chain and livelihoods interventions: Experiences, impacts and lessons from Cameroon T2.15 Innovations to support sustainability in non-timber forest products value chains Verina Ingram1 , Rene Kaam1, 2, Louis Ndumbe3, Abdon Awono4, Divine Tita Foundjem4, Michele Danleu5 1 Wageningen University &amp; Research 2 INBAR 3 University of Buea 4 CIFOR-ICRAF 5 GIZ Abstract Cameroon represents &#39;&#39;Africa in miniature&#39;&#39; with high levels of forest cover but increasing rates of deforestation, and variable but common use of forest products for multiple subsistence and commercial uses. Despite the national development situation moving from low to medium level development status, rural poverty remains high, particularly among marginalized societal and ethnic groups, and is associated with forest product use, dependence, commercialisation and social-ecological resilience. Over 25 years of development, conservation and research interventions have sought to support sustainable commercialization, value chain development, alternative livelihoods, cultivation and domestication of non-timber forest products (NTFPs)in Cameroon. Over this period, narratives on NTFPs, value chain development, rural development, forest-people relationships, justifications of interventions and impact logics, measurements of impacts using top-down or science based-knowledge - have changed little. Indicators of the effectiveness of interventions, such as changes in prices, profits, value adding, harvesting practices, cultivation rates, resource availability, empowerment, deforestation and conservation have been mixed. This raises questions of what have been the legacy and impacts of such interventions in the long term? What has changed, for who and why? Whats worked and not worked? What lessons can be learnt from evaluating successes and failures of intervention concerning NTFPs on livelihoods and ecosystems looking at the (un)expected outcomes and impacts? and, what do these lessons imply for future policies, projects, programs and interventions? This article examines the evidence by taking a long-term view identifying 10 projects/programs, and then involving the beneficiaries and implementers in evaluating long-term socio-economic, political (governance and policy) and ecological outcomes and impacts of these interventions. The discussion is conceptualized in terms of Sustainable Livelihoods Approach and Social-Ecological systems thinking (i.e. impacts on both livelihoods and -ecosystems of the landscapes where these products originate from) and taking a value chain approach to look at direct (and indirect) actors in NTFP value chains and interventions. Implications for scientific research, local knowledge and practices, and policy will be presented.
25 years of non-timber forest product value chain and livelihoods interventions: Experiences, impacts and lessons from Cameroon from Verina Ingram
]]> 65 0 https://cdn.slidesharecdn.com/ss_thumbnails/ingramiufrot2-240730105840-794dd29d-thumbnail.jpg?width=120&height=120&fit=bounds presentation Black http://activitystrea.ms/schema/1.0/post http://activitystrea.ms/schema/1.0/posted 0 Deforestation-free trade: ideal or illusion? /slideshow/deforestation-free-trade-ideal-or-illusion/270616061 ingrameudrdeforestation-freecommodityvaluechains2024-240730105549-88cab26d
5th International Forest Policy Meeting A Political Forest Helsinki, 10-12 April 2024 https://www.helsinki.fi/en/conferences/international-forest-policy-meeting-5 Panel 3 Deforestation, trade & investment, and the governance of supply chains over time Deforestation-free trade: ideal or illusion? Verina Ingram, Jelle Behagel Forest & Nature Conservation Policy Group, Wageningen University and Research verina.ingram@wur.nl Jelle.behagel@wur.nl In person Globally traded commodities drive deforestation directly and indirectly. In response, zero-deforestation value chains (ZD-VC) have been promoted in various policy domains, including the recent EU Deforestation Regulation. We review current debates on ZD-VC approaches found in policy documents, peer-reviewed literature, and web-based data, with a specific focus on the policy ideas, ideals and measures these debates propose to achieve zero deforestation in relation to commodity production. This paper explores these debates. Firstly we identified five policy discourses around ZD-VC that express specific ideas about what causes deforestation and how the ideals of how it should be addressed. Secondly, we identified six approaches to attain ZD-VC that have been used in the last two decades: regulatory approaches, landscape and jurisdictional approaches, corporate pledges, voluntary sustainability standards, public-private partnerships and due diligence mechanisms. 3. We then (re)constructed the theories-of-change behind these approaches and linked them back to the discourses, finding that the study of discourses helps explain political preferences for one approach over another and expectations of effectiveness. We reviewed evidence on the effectiveness of different approaches finding illusions created of action worldwide, whereas few approaches target current and newly emerging hotspots of commodity-driven deforestation in tropical and temperate deforestation frontiers, despite this being crucial to achieve the goal of zero deforestation on a global scale. Also problematic are that approaches and policies are biased towards highly deforested areas and the lowest geographical context of farm-level avoided deforestation. In addition, geographical displacement of deforestation and spill-over effects from one commodity to another are hardly addressed. These findings suggest that by combining approaches the weaknesses of different approaches and blind spots could be overcome however that this is often politically difficult given the underlying ideologies and preferences for specific policy instruments. Our findings suggest that political ideology, rather than the evidence of what approaches work and why underlies most theories-of-change. Critically exploring these illusions can offer insights for forest policy researchers and stakeholders addressing interconnected interests, cross-sectoral and transboundary interdependencies. We argue for global efforts to produce effective, well-designed, interlink]]>
5th International Forest Policy Meeting A Political Forest Helsinki, 10-12 April 2024 https://www.helsinki.fi/en/conferences/international-forest-policy-meeting-5 Panel 3 Deforestation, trade & investment, and the governance of supply chains over time Deforestation-free trade: ideal or illusion? Verina Ingram, Jelle Behagel Forest & Nature Conservation Policy Group, Wageningen University and Research verina.ingram@wur.nl Jelle.behagel@wur.nl In person Globally traded commodities drive deforestation directly and indirectly. In response, zero-deforestation value chains (ZD-VC) have been promoted in various policy domains, including the recent EU Deforestation Regulation. We review current debates on ZD-VC approaches found in policy documents, peer-reviewed literature, and web-based data, with a specific focus on the policy ideas, ideals and measures these debates propose to achieve zero deforestation in relation to commodity production. This paper explores these debates. Firstly we identified five policy discourses around ZD-VC that express specific ideas about what causes deforestation and how the ideals of how it should be addressed. Secondly, we identified six approaches to attain ZD-VC that have been used in the last two decades: regulatory approaches, landscape and jurisdictional approaches, corporate pledges, voluntary sustainability standards, public-private partnerships and due diligence mechanisms. 3. We then (re)constructed the theories-of-change behind these approaches and linked them back to the discourses, finding that the study of discourses helps explain political preferences for one approach over another and expectations of effectiveness. We reviewed evidence on the effectiveness of different approaches finding illusions created of action worldwide, whereas few approaches target current and newly emerging hotspots of commodity-driven deforestation in tropical and temperate deforestation frontiers, despite this being crucial to achieve the goal of zero deforestation on a global scale. Also problematic are that approaches and policies are biased towards highly deforested areas and the lowest geographical context of farm-level avoided deforestation. In addition, geographical displacement of deforestation and spill-over effects from one commodity to another are hardly addressed. These findings suggest that by combining approaches the weaknesses of different approaches and blind spots could be overcome however that this is often politically difficult given the underlying ideologies and preferences for specific policy instruments. Our findings suggest that political ideology, rather than the evidence of what approaches work and why underlies most theories-of-change. Critically exploring these illusions can offer insights for forest policy researchers and stakeholders addressing interconnected interests, cross-sectoral and transboundary interdependencies. We argue for global efforts to produce effective, well-designed, interlink]]> Tue, 30 Jul 2024 10:55:48 GMT /slideshow/deforestation-free-trade-ideal-or-illusion/270616061 VerinaIngram@slideshare.net(VerinaIngram) Deforestation-free trade: ideal or illusion? VerinaIngram 5th International Forest Policy Meeting A Political Forest Helsinki, 10-12 April 2024 https://www.helsinki.fi/en/conferences/international-forest-policy-meeting-5 Panel 3 Deforestation, trade & investment, and the governance of supply chains over time Deforestation-free trade: ideal or illusion? Verina Ingram, Jelle Behagel Forest & Nature Conservation Policy Group, Wageningen University and Research verina.ingram@wur.nl Jelle.behagel@wur.nl In person Globally traded commodities drive deforestation directly and indirectly. In response, zero-deforestation value chains (ZD-VC) have been promoted in various policy domains, including the recent EU Deforestation Regulation. We review current debates on ZD-VC approaches found in policy documents, peer-reviewed literature, and web-based data, with a specific focus on the policy ideas, ideals and measures these debates propose to achieve zero deforestation in relation to commodity production. This paper explores these debates. Firstly we identified five policy discourses around ZD-VC that express specific ideas about what causes deforestation and how the ideals of how it should be addressed. Secondly, we identified six approaches to attain ZD-VC that have been used in the last two decades: regulatory approaches, landscape and jurisdictional approaches, corporate pledges, voluntary sustainability standards, public-private partnerships and due diligence mechanisms. 3. We then (re)constructed the theories-of-change behind these approaches and linked them back to the discourses, finding that the study of discourses helps explain political preferences for one approach over another and expectations of effectiveness. We reviewed evidence on the effectiveness of different approaches finding illusions created of action worldwide, whereas few approaches target current and newly emerging hotspots of commodity-driven deforestation in tropical and temperate deforestation frontiers, despite this being crucial to achieve the goal of zero deforestation on a global scale. Also problematic are that approaches and policies are biased towards highly deforested areas and the lowest geographical context of farm-level avoided deforestation. In addition, geographical displacement of deforestation and spill-over effects from one commodity to another are hardly addressed. These findings suggest that by combining approaches the weaknesses of different approaches and blind spots could be overcome however that this is often politically difficult given the underlying ideologies and preferences for specific policy instruments. Our findings suggest that political ideology, rather than the evidence of what approaches work and why underlies most theories-of-change. Critically exploring these illusions can offer insights for forest policy researchers and stakeholders addressing interconnected interests, cross-sectoral and transboundary interdependencies. We argue for global efforts to produce effective, well-designed, interlink <img style="border:1px solid #C3E6D8;float:right;" alt="" src="https://cdn.slidesharecdn.com/ss_thumbnails/ingrameudrdeforestation-freecommodityvaluechains2024-240730105549-88cab26d-thumbnail.jpg?width=120&amp;height=120&amp;fit=bounds" /><br> 5th International Forest Policy Meeting A Political Forest Helsinki, 10-12 April 2024 https://www.helsinki.fi/en/conferences/international-forest-policy-meeting-5 Panel 3 Deforestation, trade &amp; investment, and the governance of supply chains over time Deforestation-free trade: ideal or illusion? Verina Ingram, Jelle Behagel Forest &amp; Nature Conservation Policy Group, Wageningen University and Research verina.ingram@wur.nl Jelle.behagel@wur.nl In person Globally traded commodities drive deforestation directly and indirectly. In response, zero-deforestation value chains (ZD-VC) have been promoted in various policy domains, including the recent EU Deforestation Regulation. We review current debates on ZD-VC approaches found in policy documents, peer-reviewed literature, and web-based data, with a specific focus on the policy ideas, ideals and measures these debates propose to achieve zero deforestation in relation to commodity production. This paper explores these debates. Firstly we identified five policy discourses around ZD-VC that express specific ideas about what causes deforestation and how the ideals of how it should be addressed. Secondly, we identified six approaches to attain ZD-VC that have been used in the last two decades: regulatory approaches, landscape and jurisdictional approaches, corporate pledges, voluntary sustainability standards, public-private partnerships and due diligence mechanisms. 3. We then (re)constructed the theories-of-change behind these approaches and linked them back to the discourses, finding that the study of discourses helps explain political preferences for one approach over another and expectations of effectiveness. We reviewed evidence on the effectiveness of different approaches finding illusions created of action worldwide, whereas few approaches target current and newly emerging hotspots of commodity-driven deforestation in tropical and temperate deforestation frontiers, despite this being crucial to achieve the goal of zero deforestation on a global scale. Also problematic are that approaches and policies are biased towards highly deforested areas and the lowest geographical context of farm-level avoided deforestation. In addition, geographical displacement of deforestation and spill-over effects from one commodity to another are hardly addressed. These findings suggest that by combining approaches the weaknesses of different approaches and blind spots could be overcome however that this is often politically difficult given the underlying ideologies and preferences for specific policy instruments. Our findings suggest that political ideology, rather than the evidence of what approaches work and why underlies most theories-of-change. Critically exploring these illusions can offer insights for forest policy researchers and stakeholders addressing interconnected interests, cross-sectoral and transboundary interdependencies. We argue for global efforts to produce effective, well-designed, interlink
Deforestation-free trade: ideal or illusion? from Verina Ingram
]]> 20 0 https://cdn.slidesharecdn.com/ss_thumbnails/ingrameudrdeforestation-freecommodityvaluechains2024-240730105549-88cab26d-thumbnail.jpg?width=120&height=120&fit=bounds presentation Black http://activitystrea.ms/schema/1.0/post http://activitystrea.ms/schema/1.0/posted 0 TCforBE CONCEPTS TO UNDERSTAND & RESEARCH TRANSFORMATIVE CHANGE FOR BIODIVERSITY & EQUITYSCP conference 07072023 .pdf /slideshow/tcforbe-concepts-to-understand-research-transformative-change-for-biodiversity-equityscp-conference-07072023-pdf/267690567 tcforbescpconference07072023-240501072452-505b4776
CONCEPTS TO UNDERSTAND & RESEARCH TRANSFORMATIVE CHANGE FOR BIODIVERSITY & EQUITY Transformative Change for Biodiversity & Equity Project Valerie Nelson, NRI, University of Greenwich V.J.Nelson@greenwich.ac.uk Verina Ingram, Wageningen University & Research verina.ingram@wur.nl Thirza Hermans, Wageningen University & Research thirze.hermans@wur.nl Marina Benitez Kanter , Wageningen University & Research ,marina.benitezkanter@wur.nl Albertine Vandenbussche, Wageningen University & Research albertine.vandenbussche@wur.nl Jeremy Haggar, NRI, University of Greenwich J.P.Haggar@greenwich.ac.uk Transformative Change for Biodiversity & Equity Project Presentation at SCORAI-ERSCP-WUR conference Transforming consumption-production systems toward just and sustainable futures 7 July 2023]]>
CONCEPTS TO UNDERSTAND & RESEARCH TRANSFORMATIVE CHANGE FOR BIODIVERSITY & EQUITY Transformative Change for Biodiversity & Equity Project Valerie Nelson, NRI, University of Greenwich V.J.Nelson@greenwich.ac.uk Verina Ingram, Wageningen University & Research verina.ingram@wur.nl Thirza Hermans, Wageningen University & Research thirze.hermans@wur.nl Marina Benitez Kanter , Wageningen University & Research ,marina.benitezkanter@wur.nl Albertine Vandenbussche, Wageningen University & Research albertine.vandenbussche@wur.nl Jeremy Haggar, NRI, University of Greenwich J.P.Haggar@greenwich.ac.uk Transformative Change for Biodiversity & Equity Project Presentation at SCORAI-ERSCP-WUR conference Transforming consumption-production systems toward just and sustainable futures 7 July 2023]]> Wed, 01 May 2024 07:24:52 GMT /slideshow/tcforbe-concepts-to-understand-research-transformative-change-for-biodiversity-equityscp-conference-07072023-pdf/267690567 VerinaIngram@slideshare.net(VerinaIngram) TCforBE CONCEPTS TO UNDERSTAND & RESEARCH TRANSFORMATIVE CHANGE FOR BIODIVERSITY & EQUITYSCP conference 07072023 .pdf VerinaIngram CONCEPTS TO UNDERSTAND & RESEARCH TRANSFORMATIVE CHANGE FOR BIODIVERSITY & EQUITY Transformative Change for Biodiversity & Equity Project Valerie Nelson, NRI, University of Greenwich V.J.Nelson@greenwich.ac.uk Verina Ingram, Wageningen University & Research verina.ingram@wur.nl Thirza Hermans, Wageningen University & Research thirze.hermans@wur.nl Marina Benitez Kanter , Wageningen University & Research ,marina.benitezkanter@wur.nl Albertine Vandenbussche, Wageningen University & Research albertine.vandenbussche@wur.nl Jeremy Haggar, NRI, University of Greenwich J.P.Haggar@greenwich.ac.uk Transformative Change for Biodiversity & Equity Project Presentation at SCORAI-ERSCP-WUR conference Transforming consumption-production systems toward just and sustainable futures 7 July 2023 <img style="border:1px solid #C3E6D8;float:right;" alt="" src="https://cdn.slidesharecdn.com/ss_thumbnails/tcforbescpconference07072023-240501072452-505b4776-thumbnail.jpg?width=120&amp;height=120&amp;fit=bounds" /><br> CONCEPTS TO UNDERSTAND &amp; RESEARCH TRANSFORMATIVE CHANGE FOR BIODIVERSITY &amp; EQUITY Transformative Change for Biodiversity &amp; Equity Project Valerie Nelson, NRI, University of Greenwich V.J.Nelson@greenwich.ac.uk Verina Ingram, Wageningen University &amp; Research verina.ingram@wur.nl Thirza Hermans, Wageningen University &amp; Research thirze.hermans@wur.nl Marina Benitez Kanter , Wageningen University &amp; Research ,marina.benitezkanter@wur.nl Albertine Vandenbussche, Wageningen University &amp; Research albertine.vandenbussche@wur.nl Jeremy Haggar, NRI, University of Greenwich J.P.Haggar@greenwich.ac.uk Transformative Change for Biodiversity &amp; Equity Project Presentation at SCORAI-ERSCP-WUR conference Transforming consumption-production systems toward just and sustainable futures 7 July 2023
TCforBE CONCEPTS TO UNDERSTAND & RESEARCH TRANSFORMATIVE CHANGE FOR BIODIVERSITY & EQUITYSCP conference 07072023 .pdf from Verina Ingram
]]> 12 0 https://cdn.slidesharecdn.com/ss_thumbnails/tcforbescpconference07072023-240501072452-505b4776-thumbnail.jpg?width=120&height=120&fit=bounds presentation Black http://activitystrea.ms/schema/1.0/post http://activitystrea.ms/schema/1.0/posted 0 TCforBE CONCEPTS TO UNDERSTAND & RESEARCH TRANSFORMATIVE CHANGE FOR BIODIVERSITY & EQUITYESG conference 25102023 .pdf /slideshow/tcforbe-concepts-to-understand-research-transformative-change-for-biodiversity-equityesg-conference-25102023-pdf/267690497 tcforbeesgconference25102023-240501072235-cae425df
Transformative Change for Biodiversity & Equity Project CONCEPTS TO UNDERSTAND & RESEARCH TRANSFORMATIVE CHANGE FOR BIODIVERSITY & EQUITY Verina Ingram, Wageningen University & Research verina.ingram@wur.nl Valerie Nelson, NRI, University of Greenwich V.J.Nelson@greenwich.ac.uk Thirza Hermans, Wageningen University & Research thirze.hermans@wur.nl Albertine Vandenbussche, Wageningen University & Research albertine.vandenbussche@wur.nl Marina Benitez Kanter , Wageningen University & Research marina.benitezkanter@wur.nl Jeremy Haggar, NRI, University of Greenwich J.P.Haggar@greenwich.ac.uk Transformative Change for Biodiversity & Equity Project Presentation at 2023 Radboud Conference on Earth System Governance, Nijmegen: Food System Transformation Imaginaries and Policy Paradigms Session, 25 October 2023]]>
Transformative Change for Biodiversity & Equity Project CONCEPTS TO UNDERSTAND & RESEARCH TRANSFORMATIVE CHANGE FOR BIODIVERSITY & EQUITY Verina Ingram, Wageningen University & Research verina.ingram@wur.nl Valerie Nelson, NRI, University of Greenwich V.J.Nelson@greenwich.ac.uk Thirza Hermans, Wageningen University & Research thirze.hermans@wur.nl Albertine Vandenbussche, Wageningen University & Research albertine.vandenbussche@wur.nl Marina Benitez Kanter , Wageningen University & Research marina.benitezkanter@wur.nl Jeremy Haggar, NRI, University of Greenwich J.P.Haggar@greenwich.ac.uk Transformative Change for Biodiversity & Equity Project Presentation at 2023 Radboud Conference on Earth System Governance, Nijmegen: Food System Transformation Imaginaries and Policy Paradigms Session, 25 October 2023]]> Wed, 01 May 2024 07:22:35 GMT /slideshow/tcforbe-concepts-to-understand-research-transformative-change-for-biodiversity-equityesg-conference-25102023-pdf/267690497 VerinaIngram@slideshare.net(VerinaIngram) TCforBE CONCEPTS TO UNDERSTAND & RESEARCH TRANSFORMATIVE CHANGE FOR BIODIVERSITY & EQUITYESG conference 25102023 .pdf VerinaIngram Transformative Change for Biodiversity & Equity Project CONCEPTS TO UNDERSTAND & RESEARCH TRANSFORMATIVE CHANGE FOR BIODIVERSITY & EQUITY Verina Ingram, Wageningen University & Research verina.ingram@wur.nl Valerie Nelson, NRI, University of Greenwich V.J.Nelson@greenwich.ac.uk Thirza Hermans, Wageningen University & Research thirze.hermans@wur.nl Albertine Vandenbussche, Wageningen University & Research albertine.vandenbussche@wur.nl Marina Benitez Kanter , Wageningen University & Research marina.benitezkanter@wur.nl Jeremy Haggar, NRI, University of Greenwich J.P.Haggar@greenwich.ac.uk Transformative Change for Biodiversity & Equity Project Presentation at 2023 Radboud Conference on Earth System Governance, Nijmegen: Food System Transformation Imaginaries and Policy Paradigms Session, 25 October 2023 <img style="border:1px solid #C3E6D8;float:right;" alt="" src="https://cdn.slidesharecdn.com/ss_thumbnails/tcforbeesgconference25102023-240501072235-cae425df-thumbnail.jpg?width=120&amp;height=120&amp;fit=bounds" /><br> Transformative Change for Biodiversity &amp; Equity Project CONCEPTS TO UNDERSTAND &amp; RESEARCH TRANSFORMATIVE CHANGE FOR BIODIVERSITY &amp; EQUITY Verina Ingram, Wageningen University &amp; Research verina.ingram@wur.nl Valerie Nelson, NRI, University of Greenwich V.J.Nelson@greenwich.ac.uk Thirza Hermans, Wageningen University &amp; Research thirze.hermans@wur.nl Albertine Vandenbussche, Wageningen University &amp; Research albertine.vandenbussche@wur.nl Marina Benitez Kanter , Wageningen University &amp; Research marina.benitezkanter@wur.nl Jeremy Haggar, NRI, University of Greenwich J.P.Haggar@greenwich.ac.uk Transformative Change for Biodiversity &amp; Equity Project Presentation at 2023 Radboud Conference on Earth System Governance, Nijmegen: Food System Transformation Imaginaries and Policy Paradigms Session, 25 October 2023
TCforBE CONCEPTS TO UNDERSTAND & RESEARCH TRANSFORMATIVE CHANGE FOR BIODIVERSITY & EQUITYESG conference 25102023 .pdf from Verina Ingram
]]> 16 0 https://cdn.slidesharecdn.com/ss_thumbnails/tcforbeesgconference25102023-240501072235-cae425df-thumbnail.jpg?width=120&height=120&fit=bounds presentation Black http://activitystrea.ms/schema/1.0/post http://activitystrea.ms/schema/1.0/posted 0 Mbane Leadership & Community Forestry Performance in Cameroon 02042024.pdf /slideshow/mbane-leadership-community-forestry-performance-in-cameroon-02042024pdf/267688911 mbaneleadershipcommunityforestryperformanceincameroon02042024-240501064002-d1d606d5
Exploring the Effect of Leadership styles on Community Forest Performance and the Mediating role of Community Participation in Cameroon - Joseph Mbane, CIFOR-IRCAF Community forestry enterprises in the Congo Basin Seminar 10.00 -13.00 2 April 2024 NCountR Room, Impulse, Wageningen CMAPUS & online doctoral Defense Serge Piabuo Community Forest Enterprises (CFEs) as successful social enterprises: Empirical Evidence from Cameroon 16.00 17.30 2 April 2024 Omnia Auditorium, Wageningen campus & online Link to recording https://wur-educationsupport.screenstepslive.com/m/111045/l/1595365-about-recording-and-livestreaming-a-promotion-phd-defence-graduation-ceremony-inauguration-farewell-speech-or-other-public-events#where-can-i-watch-the-livestream]]>
Exploring the Effect of Leadership styles on Community Forest Performance and the Mediating role of Community Participation in Cameroon - Joseph Mbane, CIFOR-IRCAF Community forestry enterprises in the Congo Basin Seminar 10.00 -13.00 2 April 2024 NCountR Room, Impulse, Wageningen CMAPUS & online doctoral Defense Serge Piabuo Community Forest Enterprises (CFEs) as successful social enterprises: Empirical Evidence from Cameroon 16.00 17.30 2 April 2024 Omnia Auditorium, Wageningen campus & online Link to recording https://wur-educationsupport.screenstepslive.com/m/111045/l/1595365-about-recording-and-livestreaming-a-promotion-phd-defence-graduation-ceremony-inauguration-farewell-speech-or-other-public-events#where-can-i-watch-the-livestream]]> Wed, 01 May 2024 06:40:02 GMT /slideshow/mbane-leadership-community-forestry-performance-in-cameroon-02042024pdf/267688911 VerinaIngram@slideshare.net(VerinaIngram) Mbane Leadership & Community Forestry Performance in Cameroon 02042024.pdf VerinaIngram Exploring the Effect of Leadership styles on Community Forest Performance and the Mediating role of Community Participation in Cameroon - Joseph Mbane, CIFOR-IRCAF Community forestry enterprises in the Congo Basin Seminar 10.00 -13.00 2 April 2024 NCountR Room, Impulse, Wageningen CMAPUS & online doctoral Defense Serge Piabuo Community Forest Enterprises (CFEs) as successful social enterprises: Empirical Evidence from Cameroon 16.00 17.30 2 April 2024 Omnia Auditorium, Wageningen campus & online Link to recording https://wur-educationsupport.screenstepslive.com/m/111045/l/1595365-about-recording-and-livestreaming-a-promotion-phd-defence-graduation-ceremony-inauguration-farewell-speech-or-other-public-events#where-can-i-watch-the-livestream <img style="border:1px solid #C3E6D8;float:right;" alt="" src="https://cdn.slidesharecdn.com/ss_thumbnails/mbaneleadershipcommunityforestryperformanceincameroon02042024-240501064002-d1d606d5-thumbnail.jpg?width=120&amp;height=120&amp;fit=bounds" /><br> Exploring the Effect of Leadership styles on Community Forest Performance and the Mediating role of Community Participation in Cameroon - Joseph Mbane, CIFOR-IRCAF Community forestry enterprises in the Congo Basin Seminar 10.00 -13.00 2 April 2024 NCountR Room, Impulse, Wageningen CMAPUS &amp; online doctoral Defense Serge Piabuo Community Forest Enterprises (CFEs) as successful social enterprises: Empirical Evidence from Cameroon 16.00 17.30 2 April 2024 Omnia Auditorium, Wageningen campus &amp; online Link to recording https://wur-educationsupport.screenstepslive.com/m/111045/l/1595365-about-recording-and-livestreaming-a-promotion-phd-defence-graduation-ceremony-inauguration-farewell-speech-or-other-public-events#where-can-i-watch-the-livestream
Mbane Leadership & Community Forestry Performance in Cameroon 02042024.pdf from Verina Ingram
]]> 24 0 https://cdn.slidesharecdn.com/ss_thumbnails/mbaneleadershipcommunityforestryperformanceincameroon02042024-240501064002-d1d606d5-thumbnail.jpg?width=120&height=120&fit=bounds presentation Black http://activitystrea.ms/schema/1.0/post http://activitystrea.ms/schema/1.0/posted 0 Maindo Lessons from CF in Bafwasende Landscape.pdf /slideshow/maindo-lessons-from-cf-in-bafwasende-landscapepdf/267688855 maindolessonsfromcfinbafwasendelandscape-240501063833-943341b6
Lessons from community forestry enterprises in Bafwasende landscape, Congo Alphonse Maindo, Tropenbos International Community forestry enterprises in the Congo Basin Seminar 10.00 -13.00 2 April 2024 NCountR Room, Impulse, Wageningen CMAPUS & online doctoral Defense Serge Piabuo Community Forest Enterprises (CFEs) as successful social enterprises: Empirical Evidence from Cameroon 16.00 17.30 2 April 2024 Omnia Auditorium, Wageningen campus & online Link to recording https://wur-educationsupport.screenstepslive.com/m/111045/l/1595365-about-recording-and-livestreaming-a-promotion-phd-defence-graduation-ceremony-inauguration-farewell-speech-or-other-public-events#where-can-i-watch-the-livestream ]]>
Lessons from community forestry enterprises in Bafwasende landscape, Congo Alphonse Maindo, Tropenbos International Community forestry enterprises in the Congo Basin Seminar 10.00 -13.00 2 April 2024 NCountR Room, Impulse, Wageningen CMAPUS & online doctoral Defense Serge Piabuo Community Forest Enterprises (CFEs) as successful social enterprises: Empirical Evidence from Cameroon 16.00 17.30 2 April 2024 Omnia Auditorium, Wageningen campus & online Link to recording https://wur-educationsupport.screenstepslive.com/m/111045/l/1595365-about-recording-and-livestreaming-a-promotion-phd-defence-graduation-ceremony-inauguration-farewell-speech-or-other-public-events#where-can-i-watch-the-livestream ]]> Wed, 01 May 2024 06:38:33 GMT /slideshow/maindo-lessons-from-cf-in-bafwasende-landscapepdf/267688855 VerinaIngram@slideshare.net(VerinaIngram) Maindo Lessons from CF in Bafwasende Landscape.pdf VerinaIngram Lessons from community forestry enterprises in Bafwasende landscape, Congo Alphonse Maindo, Tropenbos International Community forestry enterprises in the Congo Basin Seminar 10.00 -13.00 2 April 2024 NCountR Room, Impulse, Wageningen CMAPUS & online doctoral Defense Serge Piabuo Community Forest Enterprises (CFEs) as successful social enterprises: Empirical Evidence from Cameroon 16.00 17.30 2 April 2024 Omnia Auditorium, Wageningen campus & online Link to recording https://wur-educationsupport.screenstepslive.com/m/111045/l/1595365-about-recording-and-livestreaming-a-promotion-phd-defence-graduation-ceremony-inauguration-farewell-speech-or-other-public-events#where-can-i-watch-the-livestream <img style="border:1px solid #C3E6D8;float:right;" alt="" src="https://cdn.slidesharecdn.com/ss_thumbnails/maindolessonsfromcfinbafwasendelandscape-240501063833-943341b6-thumbnail.jpg?width=120&amp;height=120&amp;fit=bounds" /><br> Lessons from community forestry enterprises in Bafwasende landscape, Congo Alphonse Maindo, Tropenbos International Community forestry enterprises in the Congo Basin Seminar 10.00 -13.00 2 April 2024 NCountR Room, Impulse, Wageningen CMAPUS &amp; online doctoral Defense Serge Piabuo Community Forest Enterprises (CFEs) as successful social enterprises: Empirical Evidence from Cameroon 16.00 17.30 2 April 2024 Omnia Auditorium, Wageningen campus &amp; online Link to recording https://wur-educationsupport.screenstepslive.com/m/111045/l/1595365-about-recording-and-livestreaming-a-promotion-phd-defence-graduation-ceremony-inauguration-farewell-speech-or-other-public-events#where-can-i-watch-the-livestream
Maindo Lessons from CF in Bafwasende Landscape.pdf from Verina Ingram
]]> 12 0 https://cdn.slidesharecdn.com/ss_thumbnails/maindolessonsfromcfinbafwasendelandscape-240501063833-943341b6-thumbnail.jpg?width=120&height=120&fit=bounds presentation Black http://activitystrea.ms/schema/1.0/post http://activitystrea.ms/schema/1.0/posted 0 Kengne & Lescuyer CF and social entreprises 02042024.pdf /slideshow/kengne-lescuyer-cf-and-social-entreprises-02042024pdf/267688809 kengnelescuyercfandsocialentreprises02042024-240501063717-7d161b5f
Two decades of implementation of community forestry in Cameroon: What changes in the livelihoods of local populations? - Fabrice Kengen & Guillaume Lescuyer, CIRAD Community forestry enterprises in the Congo Basin Seminar Chaired by Verina Ingram & Serge Piabou (Wagenignen UR) 10.00 -13.00 2 April 2024 NCountR Room, Impulse, Wageningen CMAPUS & online doctoral Defense Serge Piabuo Community Forest Enterprises (CFEs) as successful social enterprises: Empirical Evidence from Cameroon 16.00 17.30 2 April 2024 Omnia Auditorium, Wageningen campus & online Link to recording https://wur-educationsupport.screenstepslive.com/m/111045/l/1595365-about-recording-and-livestreaming-a-promotion-phd-defence-graduation-ceremony-inauguration-farewell-speech-or-other-public-events#where-can-i-watch-the-livestream ]]>
Two decades of implementation of community forestry in Cameroon: What changes in the livelihoods of local populations? - Fabrice Kengen & Guillaume Lescuyer, CIRAD Community forestry enterprises in the Congo Basin Seminar Chaired by Verina Ingram & Serge Piabou (Wagenignen UR) 10.00 -13.00 2 April 2024 NCountR Room, Impulse, Wageningen CMAPUS & online doctoral Defense Serge Piabuo Community Forest Enterprises (CFEs) as successful social enterprises: Empirical Evidence from Cameroon 16.00 17.30 2 April 2024 Omnia Auditorium, Wageningen campus & online Link to recording https://wur-educationsupport.screenstepslive.com/m/111045/l/1595365-about-recording-and-livestreaming-a-promotion-phd-defence-graduation-ceremony-inauguration-farewell-speech-or-other-public-events#where-can-i-watch-the-livestream ]]> Wed, 01 May 2024 06:37:17 GMT /slideshow/kengne-lescuyer-cf-and-social-entreprises-02042024pdf/267688809 VerinaIngram@slideshare.net(VerinaIngram) Kengne & Lescuyer CF and social entreprises 02042024.pdf VerinaIngram Two decades of implementation of community forestry in Cameroon: What changes in the livelihoods of local populations? - Fabrice Kengen & Guillaume Lescuyer, CIRAD Community forestry enterprises in the Congo Basin Seminar Chaired by Verina Ingram & Serge Piabou (Wagenignen UR) 10.00 -13.00 2 April 2024 NCountR Room, Impulse, Wageningen CMAPUS & online doctoral Defense Serge Piabuo Community Forest Enterprises (CFEs) as successful social enterprises: Empirical Evidence from Cameroon 16.00 17.30 2 April 2024 Omnia Auditorium, Wageningen campus & online Link to recording https://wur-educationsupport.screenstepslive.com/m/111045/l/1595365-about-recording-and-livestreaming-a-promotion-phd-defence-graduation-ceremony-inauguration-farewell-speech-or-other-public-events#where-can-i-watch-the-livestream <img style="border:1px solid #C3E6D8;float:right;" alt="" src="https://cdn.slidesharecdn.com/ss_thumbnails/kengnelescuyercfandsocialentreprises02042024-240501063717-7d161b5f-thumbnail.jpg?width=120&amp;height=120&amp;fit=bounds" /><br> Two decades of implementation of community forestry in Cameroon: What changes in the livelihoods of local populations? - Fabrice Kengen &amp; Guillaume Lescuyer, CIRAD Community forestry enterprises in the Congo Basin Seminar Chaired by Verina Ingram &amp; Serge Piabou (Wagenignen UR) 10.00 -13.00 2 April 2024 NCountR Room, Impulse, Wageningen CMAPUS &amp; online doctoral Defense Serge Piabuo Community Forest Enterprises (CFEs) as successful social enterprises: Empirical Evidence from Cameroon 16.00 17.30 2 April 2024 Omnia Auditorium, Wageningen campus &amp; online Link to recording https://wur-educationsupport.screenstepslive.com/m/111045/l/1595365-about-recording-and-livestreaming-a-promotion-phd-defence-graduation-ceremony-inauguration-farewell-speech-or-other-public-events#where-can-i-watch-the-livestream
Kengne & Lescuyer CF and social entreprises 02042024.pdf from Verina Ingram
]]> 12 0 https://cdn.slidesharecdn.com/ss_thumbnails/kengnelescuyercfandsocialentreprises02042024-240501063717-7d161b5f-thumbnail.jpg?width=120&height=120&fit=bounds presentation Black http://activitystrea.ms/schema/1.0/post http://activitystrea.ms/schema/1.0/posted 0 Ebaa Atyi Community Forest Management in Central Africa 020424.pdf /slideshow/ebaa-atyi-community-forest-management-in-central-africa-020424pdf/267688786 ebaaatyicommunityforestmanagementincentralafrica020424-240501063644-25645f38
Community forests management in central Africa, progressandchallenges - Richard Ebba Atyi, CIFOR-IRCAF Community forestry enterprises in the Congo Basin Seminar Chaired by Verina Ingram & Serge Piabou (Wagenignen UR) 10.00 -13.00 2 April 2024 NCountR Room, Impulse, Wageningen CMAPUS & online doctoral Defense Serge Piabuo Community Forest Enterprises (CFEs) as successful social enterprises: Empirical Evidence from Cameroon 16.00 17.30 2 April 2024 Omnia Auditorium, Wageningen campus & online Link to recording https://wur-educationsupport.screenstepslive.com/m/111045/l/1595365-about-recording-and-livestreaming-a-promotion-phd-defence-graduation-ceremony-inauguration-farewell-speech-or-other-public-events#where-can-i-watch-the-livestream ]]>
Community forests management in central Africa, progressandchallenges - Richard Ebba Atyi, CIFOR-IRCAF Community forestry enterprises in the Congo Basin Seminar Chaired by Verina Ingram & Serge Piabou (Wagenignen UR) 10.00 -13.00 2 April 2024 NCountR Room, Impulse, Wageningen CMAPUS & online doctoral Defense Serge Piabuo Community Forest Enterprises (CFEs) as successful social enterprises: Empirical Evidence from Cameroon 16.00 17.30 2 April 2024 Omnia Auditorium, Wageningen campus & online Link to recording https://wur-educationsupport.screenstepslive.com/m/111045/l/1595365-about-recording-and-livestreaming-a-promotion-phd-defence-graduation-ceremony-inauguration-farewell-speech-or-other-public-events#where-can-i-watch-the-livestream ]]> Wed, 01 May 2024 06:36:44 GMT /slideshow/ebaa-atyi-community-forest-management-in-central-africa-020424pdf/267688786 VerinaIngram@slideshare.net(VerinaIngram) Ebaa Atyi Community Forest Management in Central Africa 020424.pdf VerinaIngram Community forests management in central Africa, progressandchallenges - Richard Ebba Atyi, CIFOR-IRCAF Community forestry enterprises in the Congo Basin Seminar Chaired by Verina Ingram & Serge Piabou (Wagenignen UR) 10.00 -13.00 2 April 2024 NCountR Room, Impulse, Wageningen CMAPUS & online doctoral Defense Serge Piabuo Community Forest Enterprises (CFEs) as successful social enterprises: Empirical Evidence from Cameroon 16.00 17.30 2 April 2024 Omnia Auditorium, Wageningen campus & online Link to recording https://wur-educationsupport.screenstepslive.com/m/111045/l/1595365-about-recording-and-livestreaming-a-promotion-phd-defence-graduation-ceremony-inauguration-farewell-speech-or-other-public-events#where-can-i-watch-the-livestream <img style="border:1px solid #C3E6D8;float:right;" alt="" src="https://cdn.slidesharecdn.com/ss_thumbnails/ebaaatyicommunityforestmanagementincentralafrica020424-240501063644-25645f38-thumbnail.jpg?width=120&amp;height=120&amp;fit=bounds" /><br> Community forests management in central Africa, progressandchallenges - Richard Ebba Atyi, CIFOR-IRCAF Community forestry enterprises in the Congo Basin Seminar Chaired by Verina Ingram &amp; Serge Piabou (Wagenignen UR) 10.00 -13.00 2 April 2024 NCountR Room, Impulse, Wageningen CMAPUS &amp; online doctoral Defense Serge Piabuo Community Forest Enterprises (CFEs) as successful social enterprises: Empirical Evidence from Cameroon 16.00 17.30 2 April 2024 Omnia Auditorium, Wageningen campus &amp; online Link to recording https://wur-educationsupport.screenstepslive.com/m/111045/l/1595365-about-recording-and-livestreaming-a-promotion-phd-defence-graduation-ceremony-inauguration-farewell-speech-or-other-public-events#where-can-i-watch-the-livestream
Ebaa Atyi Community Forest Management in Central Africa 020424.pdf from Verina Ingram
]]> 22 0 https://cdn.slidesharecdn.com/ss_thumbnails/ebaaatyicommunityforestmanagementincentralafrica020424-240501063644-25645f38-thumbnail.jpg?width=120&height=120&fit=bounds presentation Black http://activitystrea.ms/schema/1.0/post http://activitystrea.ms/schema/1.0/posted 0 Tita Foundjem CF in cocoa landscapes 02042024.pdf /slideshow/tita-foundjem-cf-in-cocoa-landscapes-02042024pdf/267688664 titafoundjemcfincocoalandscapes02042024-240501063402-a560e7f2
Community Forests at the Frontiers of Cocoa Production Basins: State, challenges and opportunities for riverain communities - Divine Tita Foundjem, CIFOR-IRCAF Community forestry enterprises in the Congo Basin Seminar Chaired by Verina Ingram & Serge Piabou (Wagenignen UR) 10.00 -13.00 2 April 2024 NCountR Room, Impulse, Wageningen CMAPUS & online doctoral Defense Serge Piabuo Community Forest Enterprises (CFEs) as successful social enterprises: Empirical Evidence from Cameroon 16.00 17.30 2 April 2024 Omnia Auditorium, Wageningen campus & online Link to recording https://wur-educationsupport.screenstepslive.com/m/111045/l/1595365-about-recording-and-livestreaming-a-promotion-phd-defence-graduation-ceremony-inauguration-farewell-speech-or-other-public-events#where-can-i-watch-the-livestream ]]>
Community Forests at the Frontiers of Cocoa Production Basins: State, challenges and opportunities for riverain communities - Divine Tita Foundjem, CIFOR-IRCAF Community forestry enterprises in the Congo Basin Seminar Chaired by Verina Ingram & Serge Piabou (Wagenignen UR) 10.00 -13.00 2 April 2024 NCountR Room, Impulse, Wageningen CMAPUS & online doctoral Defense Serge Piabuo Community Forest Enterprises (CFEs) as successful social enterprises: Empirical Evidence from Cameroon 16.00 17.30 2 April 2024 Omnia Auditorium, Wageningen campus & online Link to recording https://wur-educationsupport.screenstepslive.com/m/111045/l/1595365-about-recording-and-livestreaming-a-promotion-phd-defence-graduation-ceremony-inauguration-farewell-speech-or-other-public-events#where-can-i-watch-the-livestream ]]> Wed, 01 May 2024 06:34:02 GMT /slideshow/tita-foundjem-cf-in-cocoa-landscapes-02042024pdf/267688664 VerinaIngram@slideshare.net(VerinaIngram) Tita Foundjem CF in cocoa landscapes 02042024.pdf VerinaIngram Community Forests at the Frontiers of Cocoa Production Basins: State, challenges and opportunities for riverain communities - Divine Tita Foundjem, CIFOR-IRCAF Community forestry enterprises in the Congo Basin Seminar Chaired by Verina Ingram & Serge Piabou (Wagenignen UR) 10.00 -13.00 2 April 2024 NCountR Room, Impulse, Wageningen CMAPUS & online doctoral Defense Serge Piabuo Community Forest Enterprises (CFEs) as successful social enterprises: Empirical Evidence from Cameroon 16.00 17.30 2 April 2024 Omnia Auditorium, Wageningen campus & online Link to recording https://wur-educationsupport.screenstepslive.com/m/111045/l/1595365-about-recording-and-livestreaming-a-promotion-phd-defence-graduation-ceremony-inauguration-farewell-speech-or-other-public-events#where-can-i-watch-the-livestream <img style="border:1px solid #C3E6D8;float:right;" alt="" src="https://cdn.slidesharecdn.com/ss_thumbnails/titafoundjemcfincocoalandscapes02042024-240501063402-a560e7f2-thumbnail.jpg?width=120&amp;height=120&amp;fit=bounds" /><br> Community Forests at the Frontiers of Cocoa Production Basins: State, challenges and opportunities for riverain communities - Divine Tita Foundjem, CIFOR-IRCAF Community forestry enterprises in the Congo Basin Seminar Chaired by Verina Ingram &amp; Serge Piabou (Wagenignen UR) 10.00 -13.00 2 April 2024 NCountR Room, Impulse, Wageningen CMAPUS &amp; online doctoral Defense Serge Piabuo Community Forest Enterprises (CFEs) as successful social enterprises: Empirical Evidence from Cameroon 16.00 17.30 2 April 2024 Omnia Auditorium, Wageningen campus &amp; online Link to recording https://wur-educationsupport.screenstepslive.com/m/111045/l/1595365-about-recording-and-livestreaming-a-promotion-phd-defence-graduation-ceremony-inauguration-farewell-speech-or-other-public-events#where-can-i-watch-the-livestream
Tita Foundjem CF in cocoa landscapes 02042024.pdf from Verina Ingram
]]> 21 0 https://cdn.slidesharecdn.com/ss_thumbnails/titafoundjemcfincocoalandscapes02042024-240501063402-a560e7f2-thumbnail.jpg?width=120&height=120&fit=bounds presentation Black http://activitystrea.ms/schema/1.0/post http://activitystrea.ms/schema/1.0/posted 0 Impacts of cocoa sustainability initiatives in West Africa /slideshow/impacts-of-cocoa-sustainability-initiatives-in-west-africa/136552910 ingramicrsnov2017-190315111835
Verina Ingram, Yuca Waarts, Fedes van Rijn, Tinka Koster & Birgit de Vos 14 November 2017 International Symposium on Cocoa Research. Promoting Advances in Research to Enhance the Profitability of Cocoa Farming 13 17 November 2017 Lima, Peru ]]>
Verina Ingram, Yuca Waarts, Fedes van Rijn, Tinka Koster & Birgit de Vos 14 November 2017 International Symposium on Cocoa Research. Promoting Advances in Research to Enhance the Profitability of Cocoa Farming 13 17 November 2017 Lima, Peru ]]> Fri, 15 Mar 2019 11:18:35 GMT /slideshow/impacts-of-cocoa-sustainability-initiatives-in-west-africa/136552910 VerinaIngram@slideshare.net(VerinaIngram) Impacts of cocoa sustainability initiatives in West Africa VerinaIngram Verina Ingram, Yuca Waarts, Fedes van Rijn, Tinka Koster & Birgit de Vos 14 November 2017 International Symposium on Cocoa Research. Promoting Advances in Research to Enhance the Profitability of Cocoa Farming 鐃13 17 November 2017 Lima, Peru <img style="border:1px solid #C3E6D8;float:right;" alt="" src="https://cdn.slidesharecdn.com/ss_thumbnails/ingramicrsnov2017-190315111835-thumbnail.jpg?width=120&amp;height=120&amp;fit=bounds" /><br> Verina Ingram, Yuca Waarts, Fedes van Rijn, Tinka Koster &amp; Birgit de Vos 14 November 2017 International Symposium on Cocoa Research. Promoting Advances in Research to Enhance the Profitability of Cocoa Farming 鐃13 17 November 2017 Lima, Peru
Impacts of cocoa sustainability initiatives in West Africa from Verina Ingram
]]> 134 2 https://cdn.slidesharecdn.com/ss_thumbnails/ingramicrsnov2017-190315111835-thumbnail.jpg?width=120&height=120&fit=bounds presentation Black http://activitystrea.ms/schema/1.0/post http://activitystrea.ms/schema/1.0/posted 0 Impact van certificering. The impact of certification /slideshow/impact-van-certificering-the-impact-of-certification/136552837 ingramruttenutzimpactvancertifceeringlerenvanevalueren31022019-190315111622
LEREN VAN EVALUEREN 2019: BEWEGEN TUSSEN BELANGEN. Deelsessie 4 Vice VersaNWO WOTRO, Den Haag 1 February 2019]]>
LEREN VAN EVALUEREN 2019: BEWEGEN TUSSEN BELANGEN. Deelsessie 4 Vice VersaNWO WOTRO, Den Haag 1 February 2019]]> Fri, 15 Mar 2019 11:16:21 GMT /slideshow/impact-van-certificering-the-impact-of-certification/136552837 VerinaIngram@slideshare.net(VerinaIngram) Impact van certificering. The impact of certification VerinaIngram LEREN VAN EVALUEREN 2019: BEWEGEN TUSSEN BELANGEN. Deelsessie 4 Vice VersaNWO WOTRO, Den Haag 1 February 2019 <img style="border:1px solid #C3E6D8;float:right;" alt="" src="https://cdn.slidesharecdn.com/ss_thumbnails/ingramruttenutzimpactvancertifceeringlerenvanevalueren31022019-190315111622-thumbnail.jpg?width=120&amp;height=120&amp;fit=bounds" /><br> LEREN VAN EVALUEREN 2019: BEWEGEN TUSSEN BELANGEN. Deelsessie 4 Vice VersaNWO WOTRO, Den Haag 1 February 2019
Impact van certificering. The impact of certification from Verina Ingram
]]> 42 2 https://cdn.slidesharecdn.com/ss_thumbnails/ingramruttenutzimpactvancertifceeringlerenvanevalueren31022019-190315111622-thumbnail.jpg?width=120&height=120&fit=bounds presentation Black http://activitystrea.ms/schema/1.0/post http://activitystrea.ms/schema/1.0/posted 0 The role of the private sector, sustainable non-timber forest product value chains & inclusion of forest dependent communities /slideshow/the-role-of-the-private-sector-sustainable-nontimber-forest-product-value-chains-inclusion-of-forest-dependent-communities/136552785 ntfpscongobasiningram27112018-190315111403
What we know and what we should know for policymaking on NTFPs in the Congo Basin. GEF7 Program for the Congo Basin Global Environmental Facility Side Event, Brussels 28 November 2018]]>
What we know and what we should know for policymaking on NTFPs in the Congo Basin. GEF7 Program for the Congo Basin Global Environmental Facility Side Event, Brussels 28 November 2018]]> Fri, 15 Mar 2019 11:14:03 GMT /slideshow/the-role-of-the-private-sector-sustainable-nontimber-forest-product-value-chains-inclusion-of-forest-dependent-communities/136552785 VerinaIngram@slideshare.net(VerinaIngram) The role of the private sector, sustainable non-timber forest product value chains & inclusion of forest dependent communities VerinaIngram What we know and what we should know for policymaking on NTFPs in the Congo Basin. GEF7 Program for the Congo Basin Global Environmental Facility Side Event, Brussels 28 November 2018 <img style="border:1px solid #C3E6D8;float:right;" alt="" src="https://cdn.slidesharecdn.com/ss_thumbnails/ntfpscongobasiningram27112018-190315111403-thumbnail.jpg?width=120&amp;height=120&amp;fit=bounds" /><br> What we know and what we should know for policymaking on NTFPs in the Congo Basin. GEF7 Program for the Congo Basin Global Environmental Facility Side Event, Brussels 28 November 2018
The role of the private sector, sustainable non-timber forest product value chains & inclusion of forest dependent communities from Verina Ingram
]]> 107 2 https://cdn.slidesharecdn.com/ss_thumbnails/ntfpscongobasiningram27112018-190315111403-thumbnail.jpg?width=120&height=120&fit=bounds presentation Black http://activitystrea.ms/schema/1.0/post http://activitystrea.ms/schema/1.0/posted 0 https://cdn.slidesharecdn.com/profile-photo-VerinaIngram-48x48.jpg?cb=1743523481 www.wageningenur.nl/en/Expertise-Services/Chair-groups/Environmental-Sciences/Forest-and-Nature-Conservation-Policy-Group.htm https://cdn.slidesharecdn.com/ss_thumbnails/coravanoostencifor-icrafnlandscape190325-250403100003-732ac07b-thumbnail.jpg?width=320&height=320&fit=bounds slideshow/cora-van-oosten-cifor-icraf-wagenignen-landscape-dialogue-19032025-pdf/277475236 Cora van Oosten CIFOR-... https://cdn.slidesharecdn.com/ss_thumbnails/jamesreedcifor-icrafwageningenlandscapesdialogue19032025-250401161639-059416c3-thumbnail.jpg?width=320&height=320&fit=bounds slideshow/james-reed-cifor-icraf-wageningen-landscapes-dialogue-19032025-pdf/277402327 James Reed CIFOR-ICRAF... https://cdn.slidesharecdn.com/ss_thumbnails/billywilcoxisealwageningenlandscapedialogue19032025-250401161320-3f5ff744-thumbnail.jpg?width=320&height=320&fit=bounds slideshow/billy-wilcox-iseal-wageningen-landscape-dialogue-19032025-pdf/277402195 Billy Wilcox ISEAL - W...