際際滷shows by User: anthonyg79 / http://www.slideshare.net/images/logo.gif 際際滷shows by User: anthonyg79 / Tue, 29 May 2012 11:30:43 GMT 際際滷Share feed for 際際滷shows by User: anthonyg79 How Social Institutions Impact E-Accessibility Policy /slideshow/how-social-institutions-impact-eaccessibility-policy/13121777 giannoumishowsocialinstitutionsimpacte-accessibilitypolicy-120529113046-phpapp01
This paper examines how social institutions (i.e. the differences in norms, values and procedures) impact the design and implementation of national and supranational policies to promote accessibility of information and communication technology (E-Accessibility). These institutions impact E-Accessibility policy through differences in legal culture, industrial relations (relationship between the government, business and trade unions), and the relationship between public authorities and disabled people's organisations. Due to its social and political importance, the paper focuses on web accessibility (Internet and intranet websites, web based applications, and non-traditional and emerging technologies). Based on original research currently in progress the paper presents preliminary findings based on a content analysis of policy documents from the UN and the EU, and the United States, the United Kingdom and Norway. The paper describes the emergence of E-Accessibility on the UN and EU policy agenda, and compares (UK-US) and contrasts (UK-Norway) how and to what extent these countries have responded to or anticipated supranational policies to promote E-Accessibility. The paper additionally explores the role of policy diffusion across national boundaries emphasising emulation, coercion, competition and learning processes. Achieving E-Accessibility depends on whether policymakers can regulate the market to address the needs of all people, including persons with disabilities. Social regulation policies aim to influence market function and the behavior of non-governmental actors in an attempt to promote social objectives. Policy dialogue between public authorities including standards organizations and monitoring agencies, business, and advocacy organizations has also impacted the nature of policy provisions and the achievement of policy goals. The paper argues that the US, UK and Norway have not only adopted different policy instruments, they also have different approaches to ensuring or enhancing opportunities for persons with disabilities to participate in the information society. E-Accessibility policy programs and approaches in these countries have been influenced and framed by different national policy traditions, the distribution of roles, and the relationships between actors participating in the design and implementation of E-Accessibility policy. ]]>
This paper examines how social institutions (i.e. the differences in norms, values and procedures) impact the design and implementation of national and supranational policies to promote accessibility of information and communication technology (E-Accessibility). These institutions impact E-Accessibility policy through differences in legal culture, industrial relations (relationship between the government, business and trade unions), and the relationship between public authorities and disabled people's organisations. Due to its social and political importance, the paper focuses on web accessibility (Internet and intranet websites, web based applications, and non-traditional and emerging technologies). Based on original research currently in progress the paper presents preliminary findings based on a content analysis of policy documents from the UN and the EU, and the United States, the United Kingdom and Norway. The paper describes the emergence of E-Accessibility on the UN and EU policy agenda, and compares (UK-US) and contrasts (UK-Norway) how and to what extent these countries have responded to or anticipated supranational policies to promote E-Accessibility. The paper additionally explores the role of policy diffusion across national boundaries emphasising emulation, coercion, competition and learning processes. Achieving E-Accessibility depends on whether policymakers can regulate the market to address the needs of all people, including persons with disabilities. Social regulation policies aim to influence market function and the behavior of non-governmental actors in an attempt to promote social objectives. Policy dialogue between public authorities including standards organizations and monitoring agencies, business, and advocacy organizations has also impacted the nature of policy provisions and the achievement of policy goals. The paper argues that the US, UK and Norway have not only adopted different policy instruments, they also have different approaches to ensuring or enhancing opportunities for persons with disabilities to participate in the information society. E-Accessibility policy programs and approaches in these countries have been influenced and framed by different national policy traditions, the distribution of roles, and the relationships between actors participating in the design and implementation of E-Accessibility policy. ]]> Tue, 29 May 2012 11:30:43 GMT /slideshow/how-social-institutions-impact-eaccessibility-policy/13121777 anthonyg79@slideshare.net(anthonyg79) How Social Institutions Impact E-Accessibility Policy anthonyg79 This paper examines how social institutions (i.e. the differences in norms, values and procedures) impact the design and implementation of national and supranational policies to promote accessibility of information and communication technology (E-Accessibility). These institutions impact E-Accessibility policy through differences in legal culture, industrial relations (relationship between the government, business and trade unions), and the relationship between public authorities and disabled people's organisations. Due to its social and political importance, the paper focuses on web accessibility (Internet and intranet websites, web based applications, and non-traditional and emerging technologies). Based on original research currently in progress the paper presents preliminary findings based on a content analysis of policy documents from the UN and the EU, and the United States, the United Kingdom and Norway. The paper describes the emergence of E-Accessibility on the UN and EU policy agenda, and compares (UK-US) and contrasts (UK-Norway) how and to what extent these countries have responded to or anticipated supranational policies to promote E-Accessibility. The paper additionally explores the role of policy diffusion across national boundaries emphasising emulation, coercion, competition and learning processes. Achieving E-Accessibility depends on whether policymakers can regulate the market to address the needs of all people, including persons with disabilities. Social regulation policies aim to influence market function and the behavior of non-governmental actors in an attempt to promote social objectives. Policy dialogue between public authorities including standards organizations and monitoring agencies, business, and advocacy organizations has also impacted the nature of policy provisions and the achievement of policy goals. The paper argues that the US, UK and Norway have not only adopted different policy instruments, they also have different approaches to ensuring or enhancing opportunities for persons with disabilities to participate in the information society. E-Accessibility policy programs and approaches in these countries have been influenced and framed by different national policy traditions, the distribution of roles, and the relationships between actors participating in the design and implementation of E-Accessibility policy. <img style="border:1px solid #C3E6D8;float:right;" alt="" src="https://cdn.slidesharecdn.com/ss_thumbnails/giannoumishowsocialinstitutionsimpacte-accessibilitypolicy-120529113046-phpapp01-thumbnail.jpg?width=120&amp;height=120&amp;fit=bounds" /><br> This paper examines how social institutions (i.e. the differences in norms, values and procedures) impact the design and implementation of national and supranational policies to promote accessibility of information and communication technology (E-Accessibility). These institutions impact E-Accessibility policy through differences in legal culture, industrial relations (relationship between the government, business and trade unions), and the relationship between public authorities and disabled people&#39;s organisations. Due to its social and political importance, the paper focuses on web accessibility (Internet and intranet websites, web based applications, and non-traditional and emerging technologies). Based on original research currently in progress the paper presents preliminary findings based on a content analysis of policy documents from the UN and the EU, and the United States, the United Kingdom and Norway. The paper describes the emergence of E-Accessibility on the UN and EU policy agenda, and compares (UK-US) and contrasts (UK-Norway) how and to what extent these countries have responded to or anticipated supranational policies to promote E-Accessibility. The paper additionally explores the role of policy diffusion across national boundaries emphasising emulation, coercion, competition and learning processes. Achieving E-Accessibility depends on whether policymakers can regulate the market to address the needs of all people, including persons with disabilities. Social regulation policies aim to influence market function and the behavior of non-governmental actors in an attempt to promote social objectives. Policy dialogue between public authorities including standards organizations and monitoring agencies, business, and advocacy organizations has also impacted the nature of policy provisions and the achievement of policy goals. The paper argues that the US, UK and Norway have not only adopted different policy instruments, they also have different approaches to ensuring or enhancing opportunities for persons with disabilities to participate in the information society. E-Accessibility policy programs and approaches in these countries have been influenced and framed by different national policy traditions, the distribution of roles, and the relationships between actors participating in the design and implementation of E-Accessibility policy.
How Social Institutions Impact E-Accessibility Policy from George Giannoumis
]]> 882 4 https://cdn.slidesharecdn.com/ss_thumbnails/giannoumishowsocialinstitutionsimpacte-accessibilitypolicy-120529113046-phpapp01-thumbnail.jpg?width=120&height=120&fit=bounds presentation Black http://activitystrea.ms/schema/1.0/post http://activitystrea.ms/schema/1.0/posted 0 Providing a Global Perspective to Nursing Students /slideshow/providing-a-global-perspective-to-nursing-students/4953436 policypresentation22-12816219071032-phpapp01
A review of the educational standards, and the application and adaptation of the polices of the National League for Nursing Accreditation Commission (NLNAC) and the Commission on Collegiate Nursing Education (CCNE).]]>
A review of the educational standards, and the application and adaptation of the polices of the National League for Nursing Accreditation Commission (NLNAC) and the Commission on Collegiate Nursing Education (CCNE).]]> Thu, 12 Aug 2010 09:06:30 GMT /slideshow/providing-a-global-perspective-to-nursing-students/4953436 anthonyg79@slideshare.net(anthonyg79) Providing a Global Perspective to Nursing Students anthonyg79 A review of the educational standards, and the application and adaptation of the polices of the National League for Nursing Accreditation Commission (NLNAC) and the Commission on Collegiate Nursing Education (CCNE). <img style="border:1px solid #C3E6D8;float:right;" alt="" src="https://cdn.slidesharecdn.com/ss_thumbnails/policypresentation22-12816219071032-phpapp01-thumbnail.jpg?width=120&amp;height=120&amp;fit=bounds" /><br> A review of the educational standards, and the application and adaptation of the polices of the National League for Nursing Accreditation Commission (NLNAC) and the Commission on Collegiate Nursing Education (CCNE).
Providing a Global Perspective to Nursing Students from George Giannoumis
]]> 2560 5 https://cdn.slidesharecdn.com/ss_thumbnails/policypresentation22-12816219071032-phpapp01-thumbnail.jpg?width=120&height=120&fit=bounds presentation Black http://activitystrea.ms/schema/1.0/post http://activitystrea.ms/schema/1.0/posted 0 National Cancer Institute and Fox Chase Cancer Center Geographic Mapping Program /slideshow/national-cancer-institute-and-fox-chase-cancer-center-geographic-mapping-program/4953422 gmappresentationpart1and2v30-12816217396041-phpapp02
This is a presentation using the Precede Proceed Program Planning model to analyse the National Cancer Institute\'s Geographic Mapping Program. The goal of this program is to create a national network of cancer research institutes dedicated to the elimination of cancer health disparities.]]>
This is a presentation using the Precede Proceed Program Planning model to analyse the National Cancer Institute\'s Geographic Mapping Program. The goal of this program is to create a national network of cancer research institutes dedicated to the elimination of cancer health disparities.]]> Thu, 12 Aug 2010 09:04:02 GMT /slideshow/national-cancer-institute-and-fox-chase-cancer-center-geographic-mapping-program/4953422 anthonyg79@slideshare.net(anthonyg79) National Cancer Institute and Fox Chase Cancer Center Geographic Mapping Program anthonyg79 This is a presentation using the Precede Proceed Program Planning model to analyse the National Cancer Institute\'s Geographic Mapping Program. The goal of this program is to create a national network of cancer research institutes dedicated to the elimination of cancer health disparities. <img style="border:1px solid #C3E6D8;float:right;" alt="" src="https://cdn.slidesharecdn.com/ss_thumbnails/gmappresentationpart1and2v30-12816217396041-phpapp02-thumbnail.jpg?width=120&amp;height=120&amp;fit=bounds" /><br> This is a presentation using the Precede Proceed Program Planning model to analyse the National Cancer Institute\&#39;s Geographic Mapping Program. The goal of this program is to create a national network of cancer research institutes dedicated to the elimination of cancer health disparities.
National Cancer Institute and Fox Chase Cancer Center Geographic Mapping Program from George Giannoumis
]]> 281 5 https://cdn.slidesharecdn.com/ss_thumbnails/gmappresentationpart1and2v30-12816217396041-phpapp02-thumbnail.jpg?width=120&height=120&fit=bounds presentation Black http://activitystrea.ms/schema/1.0/post http://activitystrea.ms/schema/1.0/posted 0 https://cdn.slidesharecdn.com/profile-photo-anthonyg79-48x48.jpg?cb=1575393286 Offering a postgraduate degree and research experience in Public Health, an undergraduate degree in business administration, and work experience in academia, public health law, healthcare, humanitarian, wellness, and traditional corporate and public sector environments. Global awareness of public health, cultural, political and humanitarian issues, combined with an appreciation for ethnic diversity and the proven ability to establish and maintain effective working relationships in a multi-culture, multi-ethnic environment. Diversified skill set combining expertise in translational research and data analysis, information technology, teaching, and communications. Flexible, adaptable and go... http://about.me/ganthonyg https://cdn.slidesharecdn.com/ss_thumbnails/giannoumishowsocialinstitutionsimpacte-accessibilitypolicy-120529113046-phpapp01-thumbnail.jpg?width=320&height=320&fit=bounds slideshow/how-social-institutions-impact-eaccessibility-policy/13121777 How Social Institution... https://cdn.slidesharecdn.com/ss_thumbnails/policypresentation22-12816219071032-phpapp01-thumbnail.jpg?width=320&height=320&fit=bounds slideshow/providing-a-global-perspective-to-nursing-students/4953436 Providing a Global Per... https://cdn.slidesharecdn.com/ss_thumbnails/gmappresentationpart1and2v30-12816217396041-phpapp02-thumbnail.jpg?width=320&height=320&fit=bounds slideshow/national-cancer-institute-and-fox-chase-cancer-center-geographic-mapping-program/4953422 National Cancer Instit...