際際滷shows by User: dmitryku / http://www.slideshare.net/images/logo.gif 際際滷shows by User: dmitryku / Wed, 16 Oct 2024 21:39:22 GMT 際際滷Share feed for 際際滷shows by User: dmitryku 2020_Specifying K-maps through ontology engineering_IFKAD /slideshow/2020_specifying-k-maps-through-ontology-engineering_ifkad/272476471 2020specifyingk-mapsthroughontologyengineeringifkadslides-241016213922-c925c769
Specifying K-maps through ontology engineering]]>
Specifying K-maps through ontology engineering]]> Wed, 16 Oct 2024 21:39:22 GMT /slideshow/2020_specifying-k-maps-through-ontology-engineering_ifkad/272476471 dmitryku@slideshare.net(dmitryku) 2020_Specifying K-maps through ontology engineering_IFKAD dmitryku Specifying K-maps through ontology engineering <img style="border:1px solid #C3E6D8;float:right;" alt="" src="https://cdn.slidesharecdn.com/ss_thumbnails/2020specifyingk-mapsthroughontologyengineeringifkadslides-241016213922-c925c769-thumbnail.jpg?width=120&amp;height=120&amp;fit=bounds" /><br> Specifying K-maps through ontology engineering
2020_Specifying K-maps through ontology engineering_IFKAD from Dmitry Kudryavtsev
]]> 10 0 https://cdn.slidesharecdn.com/ss_thumbnails/2020specifyingk-mapsthroughontologyengineeringifkadslides-241016213922-c925c769-thumbnail.jpg?width=120&height=120&fit=bounds presentation Black http://activitystrea.ms/schema/1.0/post http://activitystrea.ms/schema/1.0/posted 0 Map of the Maps: Conceptualization of the Knowledge Maps /slideshow/map-of-the-maps-conceptualization-of-the-knowledge-maps/253257562 ilogbir2022mapofthemapskudryavtsevv2-220929130844-75c4ac2b
Presentation within the 13th Workshop on Information Logistics and Digital Transformation (ILOG 2022) at 21st International Conference on Perspectives in Business Informatics Research, Rostock, Germany The companys knowledge assets and ability to coordinate them become increasingly critical. Knowledge maps can scaffold knowledge search and decision-making by creating visible links between knowledge, its application, source, and owner. The term Knowledge map was used with various meanings in several scientific communities: knowledge management, education studies, organization studies, decision analysis, artificial intelligence, etc. The term itself is still rather vague. To generalize the variety of the definitions, one can use the term knowledge map as a description of the sources, 鍖ows, owners, and application areas of knowledge within the organization. The current study considers knowledge maps from a knowledge management perspective and is devoted to generalizing the numerous scattered knowledge mapping research and practices. It aims to identify and consolidate knowledge maps interpretations by analyzing their contents. The discussed research results in developing the ontology of knowledge maps. Existing types of knowledge maps are associated with fragments of this ontology. Such ontology may help select the necessary building blocks (templates and elements) for knowledge mapping in specific companies and situations. The research methodology is based on literature review, semantic analysis, and ontological engineering. The paper also provides the knowledge mapping ontology application guidelines and demonstrates them via a case study. ]]>
Presentation within the 13th Workshop on Information Logistics and Digital Transformation (ILOG 2022) at 21st International Conference on Perspectives in Business Informatics Research, Rostock, Germany The companys knowledge assets and ability to coordinate them become increasingly critical. Knowledge maps can scaffold knowledge search and decision-making by creating visible links between knowledge, its application, source, and owner. The term Knowledge map was used with various meanings in several scientific communities: knowledge management, education studies, organization studies, decision analysis, artificial intelligence, etc. The term itself is still rather vague. To generalize the variety of the definitions, one can use the term knowledge map as a description of the sources, 鍖ows, owners, and application areas of knowledge within the organization. The current study considers knowledge maps from a knowledge management perspective and is devoted to generalizing the numerous scattered knowledge mapping research and practices. It aims to identify and consolidate knowledge maps interpretations by analyzing their contents. The discussed research results in developing the ontology of knowledge maps. Existing types of knowledge maps are associated with fragments of this ontology. Such ontology may help select the necessary building blocks (templates and elements) for knowledge mapping in specific companies and situations. The research methodology is based on literature review, semantic analysis, and ontological engineering. The paper also provides the knowledge mapping ontology application guidelines and demonstrates them via a case study. ]]> Thu, 29 Sep 2022 13:08:44 GMT /slideshow/map-of-the-maps-conceptualization-of-the-knowledge-maps/253257562 dmitryku@slideshare.net(dmitryku) Map of the Maps: Conceptualization of the Knowledge Maps dmitryku Presentation within the 13th Workshop on Information Logistics and Digital Transformation (ILOG 2022) at 21st International Conference on Perspectives in Business Informatics Research, Rostock, Germany The companys knowledge assets and ability to coordinate them become increasingly critical. Knowledge maps can scaffold knowledge search and decision-making by creating visible links between knowledge, its application, source, and owner. The term Knowledge map was used with various meanings in several scientific communities: knowledge management, education studies, organization studies, decision analysis, artificial intelligence, etc. The term itself is still rather vague. To generalize the variety of the definitions, one can use the term knowledge map as a description of the sources, 鍖ows, owners, and application areas of knowledge within the organization. The current study considers knowledge maps from a knowledge management perspective and is devoted to generalizing the numerous scattered knowledge mapping research and practices. It aims to identify and consolidate knowledge maps interpretations by analyzing their contents. The discussed research results in developing the ontology of knowledge maps. Existing types of knowledge maps are associated with fragments of this ontology. Such ontology may help select the necessary building blocks (templates and elements) for knowledge mapping in specific companies and situations. The research methodology is based on literature review, semantic analysis, and ontological engineering. The paper also provides the knowledge mapping ontology application guidelines and demonstrates them via a case study. <img style="border:1px solid #C3E6D8;float:right;" alt="" src="https://cdn.slidesharecdn.com/ss_thumbnails/ilogbir2022mapofthemapskudryavtsevv2-220929130844-75c4ac2b-thumbnail.jpg?width=120&amp;height=120&amp;fit=bounds" /><br> Presentation within the 13th Workshop on Information Logistics and Digital Transformation (ILOG 2022) at 21st International Conference on Perspectives in Business Informatics Research, Rostock, Germany The companys knowledge assets and ability to coordinate them become increasingly critical. Knowledge maps can scaffold knowledge search and decision-making by creating visible links between knowledge, its application, source, and owner. The term Knowledge map was used with various meanings in several scientific communities: knowledge management, education studies, organization studies, decision analysis, artificial intelligence, etc. The term itself is still rather vague. To generalize the variety of the definitions, one can use the term knowledge map as a description of the sources, 鍖ows, owners, and application areas of knowledge within the organization. The current study considers knowledge maps from a knowledge management perspective and is devoted to generalizing the numerous scattered knowledge mapping research and practices. It aims to identify and consolidate knowledge maps interpretations by analyzing their contents. The discussed research results in developing the ontology of knowledge maps. Existing types of knowledge maps are associated with fragments of this ontology. Such ontology may help select the necessary building blocks (templates and elements) for knowledge mapping in specific companies and situations. The research methodology is based on literature review, semantic analysis, and ontological engineering. The paper also provides the knowledge mapping ontology application guidelines and demonstrates them via a case study.
Map of the Maps: Conceptualization of the Knowledge Maps from Dmitry Kudryavtsev
]]> 40 0 https://cdn.slidesharecdn.com/ss_thumbnails/ilogbir2022mapofthemapskudryavtsevv2-220929130844-75c4ac2b-thumbnail.jpg?width=120&height=120&fit=bounds presentation Black http://activitystrea.ms/schema/1.0/post http://activitystrea.ms/schema/1.0/posted 0 Using Enterprise Architecture Management Methods and Technologies for Knowledge Structuring in Strategic Management /dmitryku/using-enterprise-architecture-management-methods-and-technologies-for-knowledge-structuring-in-strategic-management 2017takeeaforstrategicmanagementpres-180902205821
Today, in the era of digital economy and the need for constant digital business transformation, the relevance of Enterprise Architecture (EA) tools and methods to strategic management tasks increases. According to the latest research, strategic decisionmakers face a significant number of problems, which potentially can be successfully resolved with the help of EA. This paper is a review of potential application of EA methods and technologies to support strategic management process. The main research method for this paper is an exploratory literature review focused on the evolution, classification and functionality of EA methods with subsequent analysis of relevant problems from the field of strategic management. This result is an intermediate point for the further research which may add considerable value to both researchers and practitioners. For citation: Kudryavtsev D., Kubelskiy M. Using enterprise architecture management methods and technologies for knowledge structuring in strategic management. Proceedings of Theory and Applications in the Knowledge Economy (TAKE 2017), July 12-14 2017, Zagreb, Croatia. pp. 589-599.]]>
Today, in the era of digital economy and the need for constant digital business transformation, the relevance of Enterprise Architecture (EA) tools and methods to strategic management tasks increases. According to the latest research, strategic decisionmakers face a significant number of problems, which potentially can be successfully resolved with the help of EA. This paper is a review of potential application of EA methods and technologies to support strategic management process. The main research method for this paper is an exploratory literature review focused on the evolution, classification and functionality of EA methods with subsequent analysis of relevant problems from the field of strategic management. This result is an intermediate point for the further research which may add considerable value to both researchers and practitioners. For citation: Kudryavtsev D., Kubelskiy M. Using enterprise architecture management methods and technologies for knowledge structuring in strategic management. Proceedings of Theory and Applications in the Knowledge Economy (TAKE 2017), July 12-14 2017, Zagreb, Croatia. pp. 589-599.]]> Sun, 02 Sep 2018 20:58:21 GMT /dmitryku/using-enterprise-architecture-management-methods-and-technologies-for-knowledge-structuring-in-strategic-management dmitryku@slideshare.net(dmitryku) Using Enterprise Architecture Management Methods and Technologies for Knowledge Structuring in Strategic Management dmitryku Today, in the era of digital economy and the need for constant digital business transformation, the relevance of Enterprise Architecture (EA) tools and methods to strategic management tasks increases. According to the latest research, strategic decisionmakers face a significant number of problems, which potentially can be successfully resolved with the help of EA. This paper is a review of potential application of EA methods and technologies to support strategic management process. The main research method for this paper is an exploratory literature review focused on the evolution, classification and functionality of EA methods with subsequent analysis of relevant problems from the field of strategic management. This result is an intermediate point for the further research which may add considerable value to both researchers and practitioners. For citation: Kudryavtsev D., Kubelskiy M. Using enterprise architecture management methods and technologies for knowledge structuring in strategic management. Proceedings of Theory and Applications in the Knowledge Economy (TAKE 2017), July 12-14 2017, Zagreb, Croatia. pp. 589-599. <img style="border:1px solid #C3E6D8;float:right;" alt="" src="https://cdn.slidesharecdn.com/ss_thumbnails/2017takeeaforstrategicmanagementpres-180902205821-thumbnail.jpg?width=120&amp;height=120&amp;fit=bounds" /><br> Today, in the era of digital economy and the need for constant digital business transformation, the relevance of Enterprise Architecture (EA) tools and methods to strategic management tasks increases. According to the latest research, strategic decisionmakers face a significant number of problems, which potentially can be successfully resolved with the help of EA. This paper is a review of potential application of EA methods and technologies to support strategic management process. The main research method for this paper is an exploratory literature review focused on the evolution, classification and functionality of EA methods with subsequent analysis of relevant problems from the field of strategic management. This result is an intermediate point for the further research which may add considerable value to both researchers and practitioners. For citation: Kudryavtsev D., Kubelskiy M. Using enterprise architecture management methods and technologies for knowledge structuring in strategic management. Proceedings of Theory and Applications in the Knowledge Economy (TAKE 2017), July 12-14 2017, Zagreb, Croatia. pp. 589-599.
Using Enterprise Architecture Management Methods and Technologies for Knowledge Structuring in Strategic Management from Dmitry Kudryavtsev
]]> 246 5 https://cdn.slidesharecdn.com/ss_thumbnails/2017takeeaforstrategicmanagementpres-180902205821-thumbnail.jpg?width=120&height=120&fit=bounds presentation Black http://activitystrea.ms/schema/1.0/post http://activitystrea.ms/schema/1.0/posted 0 Representing strategic organizational knowledge via diagrams, matrices and ontologies /slideshow/representing-strategic-organizational-knowledge-via-diagrams-matrices-and-ontologies/112694547 2016kdsrepresentingstrategicorganizationalknowledgegavrilovakudryavtsevmenshikova-180902194402
The paper describes methods and tools for organizational knowledge representation in the field of strategic management. Visual and matrix/table-based methods are actively used for knowledge representation in this domain. Diagrams solve problems associated with the managerial thinking (cognitive challenges), managerial communications and coordination (social problems), and the ability of managers to motivate and involve their employees (emotional problems). On the other hand, there are types of information and tasks that are better supported by matrices. In order to effectively combine diagrams with matrices the paper suggests multi-representation of organizational knowledge using ontologies. Such multi-representation capabilities for organizational knowledge are already supported by some enterprise architecture management software tools. Two of these tools are described in the paper. Citation: Kudryavtsev D., Gavrilova T., Menshikova A. Representing strategic organizational knowledge via diagrams, matrices and ontologies. XXII-th International Conference Knowledge - Dialogue Solution (KDS 2016), July 4-15, 2016, Varna, Bulgaria]]>
The paper describes methods and tools for organizational knowledge representation in the field of strategic management. Visual and matrix/table-based methods are actively used for knowledge representation in this domain. Diagrams solve problems associated with the managerial thinking (cognitive challenges), managerial communications and coordination (social problems), and the ability of managers to motivate and involve their employees (emotional problems). On the other hand, there are types of information and tasks that are better supported by matrices. In order to effectively combine diagrams with matrices the paper suggests multi-representation of organizational knowledge using ontologies. Such multi-representation capabilities for organizational knowledge are already supported by some enterprise architecture management software tools. Two of these tools are described in the paper. Citation: Kudryavtsev D., Gavrilova T., Menshikova A. Representing strategic organizational knowledge via diagrams, matrices and ontologies. XXII-th International Conference Knowledge - Dialogue Solution (KDS 2016), July 4-15, 2016, Varna, Bulgaria]]> Sun, 02 Sep 2018 19:44:02 GMT /slideshow/representing-strategic-organizational-knowledge-via-diagrams-matrices-and-ontologies/112694547 dmitryku@slideshare.net(dmitryku) Representing strategic organizational knowledge via diagrams, matrices and ontologies dmitryku The paper describes methods and tools for organizational knowledge representation in the field of strategic management. Visual and matrix/table-based methods are actively used for knowledge representation in this domain. Diagrams solve problems associated with the managerial thinking (cognitive challenges), managerial communications and coordination (social problems), and the ability of managers to motivate and involve their employees (emotional problems). On the other hand, there are types of information and tasks that are better supported by matrices. In order to effectively combine diagrams with matrices the paper suggests multi-representation of organizational knowledge using ontologies. Such multi-representation capabilities for organizational knowledge are already supported by some enterprise architecture management software tools. Two of these tools are described in the paper. Citation: Kudryavtsev D., Gavrilova T., Menshikova A. Representing strategic organizational knowledge via diagrams, matrices and ontologies. XXII-th International Conference Knowledge - Dialogue Solution (KDS 2016), July 4-15, 2016, Varna, Bulgaria <img style="border:1px solid #C3E6D8;float:right;" alt="" src="https://cdn.slidesharecdn.com/ss_thumbnails/2016kdsrepresentingstrategicorganizationalknowledgegavrilovakudryavtsevmenshikova-180902194402-thumbnail.jpg?width=120&amp;height=120&amp;fit=bounds" /><br> The paper describes methods and tools for organizational knowledge representation in the field of strategic management. Visual and matrix/table-based methods are actively used for knowledge representation in this domain. Diagrams solve problems associated with the managerial thinking (cognitive challenges), managerial communications and coordination (social problems), and the ability of managers to motivate and involve their employees (emotional problems). On the other hand, there are types of information and tasks that are better supported by matrices. In order to effectively combine diagrams with matrices the paper suggests multi-representation of organizational knowledge using ontologies. Such multi-representation capabilities for organizational knowledge are already supported by some enterprise architecture management software tools. Two of these tools are described in the paper. Citation: Kudryavtsev D., Gavrilova T., Menshikova A. Representing strategic organizational knowledge via diagrams, matrices and ontologies. XXII-th International Conference Knowledge - Dialogue Solution (KDS 2016), July 4-15, 2016, Varna, Bulgaria
Representing strategic organizational knowledge via diagrams, matrices and ontologies from Dmitry Kudryavtsev
]]> 274 4 https://cdn.slidesharecdn.com/ss_thumbnails/2016kdsrepresentingstrategicorganizationalknowledgegavrilovakudryavtsevmenshikova-180902194402-thumbnail.jpg?width=120&height=120&fit=bounds presentation Black http://activitystrea.ms/schema/1.0/post http://activitystrea.ms/schema/1.0/posted 0 仆仂仍仂亞亳亳 亳 亳仆仂仄舒亳仂仆仆舒 舒亳亠从舒: 仂仂仆仂亠仆亳亠 亠仄亳仆仂于 亳 仗仂亠仆亳舒仍 仂于仄亠仆仂亞仂 亳仗仂仍亰仂于舒仆亳 /slideshow/ss-72322838/72322838 2017v2-170219102401
仂亠弍仆仂 于 仂仆仂仍仂亞亳 亳亟 仂仆仂仍仂亞亳亶 仆仂仍仂亞亳亠从亳亶 亳仆亢亳仆亳亳仆亞 亳仄亠仆亠仆亳亠 仂仆仂仍仂亞亳亶 仆仂仄舒亳仂仆仆舒 舒亳亠从舒 (舒亳亠从舒 亳仆仂仄舒亳亳) 仆仂仍仂亞亳亳 + 仆仂仄舒亳仂仆仆舒 舒亳亠从舒 ]]>
仂亠弍仆仂 于 仂仆仂仍仂亞亳 亳亟 仂仆仂仍仂亞亳亶 仆仂仍仂亞亳亠从亳亶 亳仆亢亳仆亳亳仆亞 亳仄亠仆亠仆亳亠 仂仆仂仍仂亞亳亶 仆仂仄舒亳仂仆仆舒 舒亳亠从舒 (舒亳亠从舒 亳仆仂仄舒亳亳) 仆仂仍仂亞亳亳 + 仆仂仄舒亳仂仆仆舒 舒亳亠从舒 ]]> Sun, 19 Feb 2017 10:24:01 GMT /slideshow/ss-72322838/72322838 dmitryku@slideshare.net(dmitryku) 仆仂仍仂亞亳亳 亳 亳仆仂仄舒亳仂仆仆舒 舒亳亠从舒: 仂仂仆仂亠仆亳亠 亠仄亳仆仂于 亳 仗仂亠仆亳舒仍 仂于仄亠仆仂亞仂 亳仗仂仍亰仂于舒仆亳 dmitryku 仂亠弍仆仂 于 仂仆仂仍仂亞亳 亳亟 仂仆仂仍仂亞亳亶 仆仂仍仂亞亳亠从亳亶 亳仆亢亳仆亳亳仆亞 亳仄亠仆亠仆亳亠 仂仆仂仍仂亞亳亶 仆仂仄舒亳仂仆仆舒 舒亳亠从舒 (舒亳亠从舒 亳仆仂仄舒亳亳) 仆仂仍仂亞亳亳 + 仆仂仄舒亳仂仆仆舒 舒亳亠从舒 <img style="border:1px solid #C3E6D8;float:right;" alt="" src="https://cdn.slidesharecdn.com/ss_thumbnails/2017v2-170219102401-thumbnail.jpg?width=120&amp;height=120&amp;fit=bounds" /><br> 仂亠弍仆仂 于 仂仆仂仍仂亞亳 亳亟 仂仆仂仍仂亞亳亶 仆仂仍仂亞亳亠从亳亶 亳仆亢亳仆亳亳仆亞 亳仄亠仆亠仆亳亠 仂仆仂仍仂亞亳亶 仆仂仄舒亳仂仆仆舒 舒亳亠从舒 (舒亳亠从舒 亳仆仂仄舒亳亳) 仆仂仍仂亞亳亳 + 仆仂仄舒亳仂仆仆舒 舒亳亠从舒
仆仂仍仂亞亳亳 亳 亳仆仂仄舒亳仂仆仆舒 舒亳亠从舒: 仂仂仆仂亠仆亳亠 亠仄亳仆仂于 亳 仗仂亠仆亳舒仍 仂于仄亠仆仂亞仂 亳仗仂仍亰仂于舒仆亳 from Dmitry Kudryavtsev
]]> 1493 3 https://cdn.slidesharecdn.com/ss_thumbnails/2017v2-170219102401-thumbnail.jpg?width=120&height=120&fit=bounds presentation Black http://activitystrea.ms/schema/1.0/post http://activitystrea.ms/schema/1.0/posted 0 Knowledge management (KM) tools /dmitryku/knowledge-management-km-tools 2016kmschoolkudryavtsevfinal2-161021062408
seminar within a research school for young researchers Innovations in Knowledge Management Practices supported by Russian Science Foundation, 10-11 October 2016, Graduate School of Management St. Petersburg State University http://gsom.spbu.ru/en/all_news/event2016_10_18/]]>
seminar within a research school for young researchers Innovations in Knowledge Management Practices supported by Russian Science Foundation, 10-11 October 2016, Graduate School of Management St. Petersburg State University http://gsom.spbu.ru/en/all_news/event2016_10_18/]]> Fri, 21 Oct 2016 06:24:08 GMT /dmitryku/knowledge-management-km-tools dmitryku@slideshare.net(dmitryku) Knowledge management (KM) tools dmitryku seminar within a research school for young researchers Innovations in Knowledge Management Practices supported by Russian Science Foundation, 10-11 October 2016, Graduate School of Management St. Petersburg State University http://gsom.spbu.ru/en/all_news/event2016_10_18/ <img style="border:1px solid #C3E6D8;float:right;" alt="" src="https://cdn.slidesharecdn.com/ss_thumbnails/2016kmschoolkudryavtsevfinal2-161021062408-thumbnail.jpg?width=120&amp;height=120&amp;fit=bounds" /><br> seminar within a research school for young researchers Innovations in Knowledge Management Practices supported by Russian Science Foundation, 10-11 October 2016, Graduate School of Management St. Petersburg State University http://gsom.spbu.ru/en/all_news/event2016_10_18/
Knowledge management (KM) tools from Dmitry Kudryavtsev
]]> 16798 12 https://cdn.slidesharecdn.com/ss_thumbnails/2016kmschoolkudryavtsevfinal2-161021062408-thumbnail.jpg?width=120&height=120&fit=bounds presentation Black http://activitystrea.ms/schema/1.0/post http://activitystrea.ms/schema/1.0/posted 0 Inter-university Academic Center of Competence on Enterprise Architecture 鐃 束EA Lab損 /slideshow/interuniversity-academic-center-of-competence-on-enterprise-architecture-ea-lab/65434468 2016ealaboverviewenfinal-160828111851
EA Lab center was founded in 2014 by team of enterprise architecture experts at the intersection of education, research and industrial projects for the accumulation and dissemination of knowledge about enterprise architecture. Mission of the center - Improving the quality of education and research in the field of EA in Russia. Awareness-raising among Russian enterprises about possibilities of EA for going to a new level of management in digital era. #EALab]]>
EA Lab center was founded in 2014 by team of enterprise architecture experts at the intersection of education, research and industrial projects for the accumulation and dissemination of knowledge about enterprise architecture. Mission of the center - Improving the quality of education and research in the field of EA in Russia. Awareness-raising among Russian enterprises about possibilities of EA for going to a new level of management in digital era. #EALab]]> Sun, 28 Aug 2016 11:18:51 GMT /slideshow/interuniversity-academic-center-of-competence-on-enterprise-architecture-ea-lab/65434468 dmitryku@slideshare.net(dmitryku) Inter-university Academic Center of Competence on Enterprise Architecture 鐃 束EA Lab損 dmitryku EA Lab center was founded in 2014 by team of enterprise architecture experts at the intersection of education, research and industrial projects for the accumulation and dissemination of knowledge about enterprise architecture. Mission of the center - Improving the quality of education and research in the field of EA in Russia. Awareness-raising among Russian enterprises about possibilities of EA for going to a new level of management in digital era. #EALab <img style="border:1px solid #C3E6D8;float:right;" alt="" src="https://cdn.slidesharecdn.com/ss_thumbnails/2016ealaboverviewenfinal-160828111851-thumbnail.jpg?width=120&amp;height=120&amp;fit=bounds" /><br> EA Lab center was founded in 2014 by team of enterprise architecture experts at the intersection of education, research and industrial projects for the accumulation and dissemination of knowledge about enterprise architecture. Mission of the center - Improving the quality of education and research in the field of EA in Russia. Awareness-raising among Russian enterprises about possibilities of EA for going to a new level of management in digital era. #EALab
Inter-university Academic Center of Competence on Enterprise Architecture EA Lab from Dmitry Kudryavtsev
]]> 803 7 https://cdn.slidesharecdn.com/ss_thumbnails/2016ealaboverviewenfinal-160828111851-thumbnail.jpg?width=120&height=120&fit=bounds presentation Black http://activitystrea.ms/schema/1.0/post http://activitystrea.ms/schema/1.0/posted 0 仂仆亳亶仆亠 亳亠仄 鐃出 亳仂于仂仄 仄亳亠: 鐃術仂 仄仂亢亠 亰仆舒 从仂仄仗ﾑ亠? /slideshow/ss-58797424/58797424 2016final-160227172254
舒仆仂-仗仂仗仍仆舒 仍亠从亳 于 束仂亞亠-丿从仂仍亠損 https://progress-school.timepad.ru/event/294923/ (+亟仂弍舒于仍亠仆仂 仆亠从仂仍从仂 仗舒于仂仆 仍舒亶亟仂于 仂 仍从舒仄亳) 仂仆亳亶仆亠 亳亠仄 磦仍ﾑ 仂仆仂于仂亶 仗亠亟舒于仍亠仆亳 亰仆舒仆亳亶 从舒从 于 亞仂仍仂于亠 亠仍仂于亠从舒, 舒从 亳 于 仗舒仄亳 从仂仄仗ﾑ亠舒. 仆亳 仄仂亞 亳仄亠 舒亰仆亠 仆舒亰于舒仆亳 于 亰舒于亳亳仄仂亳 仂 仗仂仂弍舒 仂亞舒仆亳亰舒亳亳 仗仂仆亳亶 于仆亳 亳亠仄 亳 亟亳亳仗仍亳仆, 从 从仂仂仂亶 仂仆亳 仂仆仂. 舒仗亳仄亠, 亠亰舒, 仂仆仂仍仂亞亳, 仗舒于仂仆亶 从仍舒亳亳从舒仂, 从仂仆亠仗舒仍仆舒 从舒舒 亳 亟. 丐舒从亳亠 仗仂仆亳亶仆亠 亳亠仄 亳仗仂仍亰ﾑ 亟仍 仂仗亳仄亳亰舒亳亳 仗仂亳从舒 亳仆仂仄舒亳亳, 舒于仂仄舒亳亰亳仂于舒仆仆仂亞仂 亠亠仆亳 亰舒亟舒, 亳仆亠亞舒亳亳 亟舒仆仆, 舒仆舒仍亳亰舒 亠从仂于 仆舒 亠亠于亠仆仆仂仄 磶从亠 亳, 仗仂仂, 亟仍 仗仂于亠仆亳 亠从亳于仆仂亳 从仂仄仄仆亳从舒亳亶. 弍仍舒亳 亳 仗亳仄亠仆亠仆亳 舒亰仆仂仂弍舒亰仆: 仂 仄亠仆亠亟亢仄亠仆舒 亟仂 亳亰亳从亳, 仂 仗亠仂仆舒仍仆仂亶 舒弍仂 亳仆仂仄舒亳亠亶 亟仂 从仂仗仂舒亳于仆 亳亠仄 亳 亞仍仂弍舒仍仆仂亶 亠亳.]]>
舒仆仂-仗仂仗仍仆舒 仍亠从亳 于 束仂亞亠-丿从仂仍亠損 https://progress-school.timepad.ru/event/294923/ (+亟仂弍舒于仍亠仆仂 仆亠从仂仍从仂 仗舒于仂仆 仍舒亶亟仂于 仂 仍从舒仄亳) 仂仆亳亶仆亠 亳亠仄 磦仍ﾑ 仂仆仂于仂亶 仗亠亟舒于仍亠仆亳 亰仆舒仆亳亶 从舒从 于 亞仂仍仂于亠 亠仍仂于亠从舒, 舒从 亳 于 仗舒仄亳 从仂仄仗ﾑ亠舒. 仆亳 仄仂亞 亳仄亠 舒亰仆亠 仆舒亰于舒仆亳 于 亰舒于亳亳仄仂亳 仂 仗仂仂弍舒 仂亞舒仆亳亰舒亳亳 仗仂仆亳亶 于仆亳 亳亠仄 亳 亟亳亳仗仍亳仆, 从 从仂仂仂亶 仂仆亳 仂仆仂. 舒仗亳仄亠, 亠亰舒, 仂仆仂仍仂亞亳, 仗舒于仂仆亶 从仍舒亳亳从舒仂, 从仂仆亠仗舒仍仆舒 从舒舒 亳 亟. 丐舒从亳亠 仗仂仆亳亶仆亠 亳亠仄 亳仗仂仍亰ﾑ 亟仍 仂仗亳仄亳亰舒亳亳 仗仂亳从舒 亳仆仂仄舒亳亳, 舒于仂仄舒亳亰亳仂于舒仆仆仂亞仂 亠亠仆亳 亰舒亟舒, 亳仆亠亞舒亳亳 亟舒仆仆, 舒仆舒仍亳亰舒 亠从仂于 仆舒 亠亠于亠仆仆仂仄 磶从亠 亳, 仗仂仂, 亟仍 仗仂于亠仆亳 亠从亳于仆仂亳 从仂仄仄仆亳从舒亳亶. 弍仍舒亳 亳 仗亳仄亠仆亠仆亳 舒亰仆仂仂弍舒亰仆: 仂 仄亠仆亠亟亢仄亠仆舒 亟仂 亳亰亳从亳, 仂 仗亠仂仆舒仍仆仂亶 舒弍仂 亳仆仂仄舒亳亠亶 亟仂 从仂仗仂舒亳于仆 亳亠仄 亳 亞仍仂弍舒仍仆仂亶 亠亳.]]> Sat, 27 Feb 2016 17:22:54 GMT /slideshow/ss-58797424/58797424 dmitryku@slideshare.net(dmitryku) 仂仆亳亶仆亠 亳亠仄 鐃出 亳仂于仂仄 仄亳亠: 鐃術仂 仄仂亢亠 亰仆舒 从仂仄仗ﾑ亠? dmitryku 舒仆仂-仗仂仗仍仆舒 仍亠从亳 于 束仂亞亠-丿从仂仍亠損 https://progress-school.timepad.ru/event/294923/ (+亟仂弍舒于仍亠仆仂 仆亠从仂仍从仂 仗舒于仂仆 仍舒亶亟仂于 仂 仍从舒仄亳) 仂仆亳亶仆亠 亳亠仄 磦仍ﾑ 仂仆仂于仂亶 仗亠亟舒于仍亠仆亳 亰仆舒仆亳亶 从舒从 于 亞仂仍仂于亠 亠仍仂于亠从舒, 舒从 亳 于 仗舒仄亳 从仂仄仗ﾑ亠舒. 仆亳 仄仂亞 亳仄亠 舒亰仆亠 仆舒亰于舒仆亳 于 亰舒于亳亳仄仂亳 仂 仗仂仂弍舒 仂亞舒仆亳亰舒亳亳 仗仂仆亳亶 于仆亳 亳亠仄 亳 亟亳亳仗仍亳仆, 从 从仂仂仂亶 仂仆亳 仂仆仂. 舒仗亳仄亠, 亠亰舒, 仂仆仂仍仂亞亳, 仗舒于仂仆亶 从仍舒亳亳从舒仂, 从仂仆亠仗舒仍仆舒 从舒舒 亳 亟. 丐舒从亳亠 仗仂仆亳亶仆亠 亳亠仄 亳仗仂仍亰ﾑ 亟仍 仂仗亳仄亳亰舒亳亳 仗仂亳从舒 亳仆仂仄舒亳亳, 舒于仂仄舒亳亰亳仂于舒仆仆仂亞仂 亠亠仆亳 亰舒亟舒, 亳仆亠亞舒亳亳 亟舒仆仆, 舒仆舒仍亳亰舒 亠从仂于 仆舒 亠亠于亠仆仆仂仄 磶从亠 亳, 仗仂仂, 亟仍 仗仂于亠仆亳 亠从亳于仆仂亳 从仂仄仄仆亳从舒亳亶. 弍仍舒亳 亳 仗亳仄亠仆亠仆亳 舒亰仆仂仂弍舒亰仆: 仂 仄亠仆亠亟亢仄亠仆舒 亟仂 亳亰亳从亳, 仂 仗亠仂仆舒仍仆仂亶 舒弍仂 亳仆仂仄舒亳亠亶 亟仂 从仂仗仂舒亳于仆 亳亠仄 亳 亞仍仂弍舒仍仆仂亶 亠亳. <img style="border:1px solid #C3E6D8;float:right;" alt="" src="https://cdn.slidesharecdn.com/ss_thumbnails/2016final-160227172254-thumbnail.jpg?width=120&amp;height=120&amp;fit=bounds" /><br> 舒仆仂-仗仂仗仍仆舒 仍亠从亳 于 束仂亞亠-丿从仂仍亠損 https://progress-school.timepad.ru/event/294923/ (+亟仂弍舒于仍亠仆仂 仆亠从仂仍从仂 仗舒于仂仆 仍舒亶亟仂于 仂 仍从舒仄亳) 仂仆亳亶仆亠 亳亠仄 磦仍ﾑ 仂仆仂于仂亶 仗亠亟舒于仍亠仆亳 亰仆舒仆亳亶 从舒从 于 亞仂仍仂于亠 亠仍仂于亠从舒, 舒从 亳 于 仗舒仄亳 从仂仄仗ﾑ亠舒. 仆亳 仄仂亞 亳仄亠 舒亰仆亠 仆舒亰于舒仆亳 于 亰舒于亳亳仄仂亳 仂 仗仂仂弍舒 仂亞舒仆亳亰舒亳亳 仗仂仆亳亶 于仆亳 亳亠仄 亳 亟亳亳仗仍亳仆, 从 从仂仂仂亶 仂仆亳 仂仆仂. 舒仗亳仄亠, 亠亰舒, 仂仆仂仍仂亞亳, 仗舒于仂仆亶 从仍舒亳亳从舒仂, 从仂仆亠仗舒仍仆舒 从舒舒 亳 亟. 丐舒从亳亠 仗仂仆亳亶仆亠 亳亠仄 亳仗仂仍亰ﾑ 亟仍 仂仗亳仄亳亰舒亳亳 仗仂亳从舒 亳仆仂仄舒亳亳, 舒于仂仄舒亳亰亳仂于舒仆仆仂亞仂 亠亠仆亳 亰舒亟舒, 亳仆亠亞舒亳亳 亟舒仆仆, 舒仆舒仍亳亰舒 亠从仂于 仆舒 亠亠于亠仆仆仂仄 磶从亠 亳, 仗仂仂, 亟仍 仗仂于亠仆亳 亠从亳于仆仂亳 从仂仄仄仆亳从舒亳亶. 弍仍舒亳 亳 仗亳仄亠仆亠仆亳 舒亰仆仂仂弍舒亰仆: 仂 仄亠仆亠亟亢仄亠仆舒 亟仂 亳亰亳从亳, 仂 仗亠仂仆舒仍仆仂亶 舒弍仂 亳仆仂仄舒亳亠亶 亟仂 从仂仗仂舒亳于仆 亳亠仄 亳 亞仍仂弍舒仍仆仂亶 亠亳.
仂仆亳亶仆亠 亳亠仄 于 亳仂于仂仄 仄亳亠: 仂 仄仂亢亠 亰仆舒 从仂仄仗ﾑ亠? from Dmitry Kudryavtsev
]]> 1180 4 https://cdn.slidesharecdn.com/ss_thumbnails/2016final-160227172254-thumbnail.jpg?width=120&height=120&fit=bounds presentation Black http://activitystrea.ms/schema/1.0/post http://activitystrea.ms/schema/1.0/posted 0 弌-丱丐丐丕: 丐乘, , 弌丐丕丐乘 亊 /slideshow/2015-v2slideshare/47409491 2015-v2slideshare-150425132710-conversion-gate02
亳亰仆亠-舒亳亠从舒: 从仂仄仗仂仆亠仆, 仗亳仄亠仆亠仆亳亠, 亳仆仄亠仆 仄仂亟亠仍亳仂于舒仆亳. 仂从仍舒亟 仆舒 XVIII 舒仆仂-仗舒从亳亠从仂亶 从仂仆亠亠仆亳亳 束仆亢亳仆亳亳仆亞 仗亠亟仗亳亳亶 亳 仗舒于仍亠仆亳亠 亰仆舒仆亳礆亳 (&丕 2015), 仂从于舒, 21 舒仗亠仍, 2015 亞.]]>
亳亰仆亠-舒亳亠从舒: 从仂仄仗仂仆亠仆, 仗亳仄亠仆亠仆亳亠, 亳仆仄亠仆 仄仂亟亠仍亳仂于舒仆亳. 仂从仍舒亟 仆舒 XVIII 舒仆仂-仗舒从亳亠从仂亶 从仂仆亠亠仆亳亳 束仆亢亳仆亳亳仆亞 仗亠亟仗亳亳亶 亳 仗舒于仍亠仆亳亠 亰仆舒仆亳礆亳 (&丕 2015), 仂从于舒, 21 舒仗亠仍, 2015 亞.]]> Sat, 25 Apr 2015 13:27:10 GMT /slideshow/2015-v2slideshare/47409491 dmitryku@slideshare.net(dmitryku) 弌-丱丐丐丕: 丐乘, , 弌丐丕丐乘 亊 dmitryku 亳亰仆亠-舒亳亠从舒: 从仂仄仗仂仆亠仆, 仗亳仄亠仆亠仆亳亠, 亳仆仄亠仆 仄仂亟亠仍亳仂于舒仆亳. 仂从仍舒亟 仆舒 XVIII 舒仆仂-仗舒从亳亠从仂亶 从仂仆亠亠仆亳亳 束仆亢亳仆亳亳仆亞 仗亠亟仗亳亳亶 亳 仗舒于仍亠仆亳亠 亰仆舒仆亳礆亳 (&丕 2015), 仂从于舒, 21 舒仗亠仍, 2015 亞. <img style="border:1px solid #C3E6D8;float:right;" alt="" src="https://cdn.slidesharecdn.com/ss_thumbnails/2015-v2slideshare-150425132710-conversion-gate02-thumbnail.jpg?width=120&amp;height=120&amp;fit=bounds" /><br> 亳亰仆亠-舒亳亠从舒: 从仂仄仗仂仆亠仆, 仗亳仄亠仆亠仆亳亠, 亳仆仄亠仆 仄仂亟亠仍亳仂于舒仆亳. 仂从仍舒亟 仆舒 XVIII 舒仆仂-仗舒从亳亠从仂亶 从仂仆亠亠仆亳亳 束仆亢亳仆亳亳仆亞 仗亠亟仗亳亳亶 亳 仗舒于仍亠仆亳亠 亰仆舒仆亳礆亳 (&amp;丕 2015), 仂从于舒, 21 舒仗亠仍, 2015 亞.
弌-丱丐丐丕: 丐乘, , 弌丐丕丐乘 亊 from Dmitry Kudryavtsev
]]> 1965 1 https://cdn.slidesharecdn.com/ss_thumbnails/2015-v2slideshare-150425132710-conversion-gate02-thumbnail.jpg?width=120&height=120&fit=bounds presentation Black http://activitystrea.ms/schema/1.0/post http://activitystrea.ms/schema/1.0/posted 0 Applying Quality Function Deployment method for business architecture alignment /dmitryku/2014-applying-qfd-method-for-business-architecture-alignment-kudryavtsev-grigoriev-koryshevslideshare 2014applyingqfdmethodforbusinessarchitecturealignmentkudryavtsevgrigorievkoryshevslideshare-140918075224-phpapp02
Kudryavtsev D., Grigoriev L., Koryshev I. Applying Quality Function Deployment method for business architecture alignment. Proceedings of the 8th European Conference on IS Management and Evaluation (ECIME 2014), Ghent, Belgium, 11-12 September 2014, 118-127. Strategic alignment is an important issue for business architecture. The alignment concept may have many facets, but this paper mainly focuses on such aspects of an enterprise as behaviour and resources. Stakeholder concerns and customer values must define the right priorities and goals for the elements of value configuration, capabilities and resources. The right projects must be launched to develop and improve key business architecture elements. This paper suggests the model-oriented method for business architecture alignment, which uses proven matrix-based Quality Function Deployment (QFD) methodology for analysis, decision making and communication. This method can complement standard diagramming enterprise architecture methods. Although QFD was initially created for product design, it has many applications in strategy deployment. But in spite of a longstanding history, elements chosen for strategic QFD vary and are poorly aligned with existing business architecture concepts. In order to clarify the link between the suggested QFD method and business architecture elements, a meta-model is suggested, which specifies the contents of the matrices. The suggested meta-model is based on the existing reference ontologies and meta-models for strategic management. This ontological foundation supports knowledge sharing and applicability of the business architecture alignment method. Tool support (EAM-tool plugin) and method applications are also covered in this paper.]]>
Kudryavtsev D., Grigoriev L., Koryshev I. Applying Quality Function Deployment method for business architecture alignment. Proceedings of the 8th European Conference on IS Management and Evaluation (ECIME 2014), Ghent, Belgium, 11-12 September 2014, 118-127. Strategic alignment is an important issue for business architecture. The alignment concept may have many facets, but this paper mainly focuses on such aspects of an enterprise as behaviour and resources. Stakeholder concerns and customer values must define the right priorities and goals for the elements of value configuration, capabilities and resources. The right projects must be launched to develop and improve key business architecture elements. This paper suggests the model-oriented method for business architecture alignment, which uses proven matrix-based Quality Function Deployment (QFD) methodology for analysis, decision making and communication. This method can complement standard diagramming enterprise architecture methods. Although QFD was initially created for product design, it has many applications in strategy deployment. But in spite of a longstanding history, elements chosen for strategic QFD vary and are poorly aligned with existing business architecture concepts. In order to clarify the link between the suggested QFD method and business architecture elements, a meta-model is suggested, which specifies the contents of the matrices. The suggested meta-model is based on the existing reference ontologies and meta-models for strategic management. This ontological foundation supports knowledge sharing and applicability of the business architecture alignment method. Tool support (EAM-tool plugin) and method applications are also covered in this paper.]]> Thu, 18 Sep 2014 07:52:23 GMT /dmitryku/2014-applying-qfd-method-for-business-architecture-alignment-kudryavtsev-grigoriev-koryshevslideshare dmitryku@slideshare.net(dmitryku) Applying Quality Function Deployment method for business architecture alignment dmitryku Kudryavtsev D., Grigoriev L., Koryshev I. Applying Quality Function Deployment method for business architecture alignment. Proceedings of the 8th European Conference on IS Management and Evaluation (ECIME 2014), Ghent, Belgium, 11-12 September 2014, 118-127. Strategic alignment is an important issue for business architecture. The alignment concept may have many facets, but this paper mainly focuses on such aspects of an enterprise as behaviour and resources. Stakeholder concerns and customer values must define the right priorities and goals for the elements of value configuration, capabilities and resources. The right projects must be launched to develop and improve key business architecture elements. This paper suggests the model-oriented method for business architecture alignment, which uses proven matrix-based Quality Function Deployment (QFD) methodology for analysis, decision making and communication. This method can complement standard diagramming enterprise architecture methods. Although QFD was initially created for product design, it has many applications in strategy deployment. But in spite of a longstanding history, elements chosen for strategic QFD vary and are poorly aligned with existing business architecture concepts. In order to clarify the link between the suggested QFD method and business architecture elements, a meta-model is suggested, which specifies the contents of the matrices. The suggested meta-model is based on the existing reference ontologies and meta-models for strategic management. This ontological foundation supports knowledge sharing and applicability of the business architecture alignment method. Tool support (EAM-tool plugin) and method applications are also covered in this paper. <img style="border:1px solid #C3E6D8;float:right;" alt="" src="https://cdn.slidesharecdn.com/ss_thumbnails/2014applyingqfdmethodforbusinessarchitecturealignmentkudryavtsevgrigorievkoryshevslideshare-140918075224-phpapp02-thumbnail.jpg?width=120&amp;height=120&amp;fit=bounds" /><br> Kudryavtsev D., Grigoriev L., Koryshev I. Applying Quality Function Deployment method for business architecture alignment. Proceedings of the 8th European Conference on IS Management and Evaluation (ECIME 2014), Ghent, Belgium, 11-12 September 2014, 118-127. Strategic alignment is an important issue for business architecture. The alignment concept may have many facets, but this paper mainly focuses on such aspects of an enterprise as behaviour and resources. Stakeholder concerns and customer values must define the right priorities and goals for the elements of value configuration, capabilities and resources. The right projects must be launched to develop and improve key business architecture elements. This paper suggests the model-oriented method for business architecture alignment, which uses proven matrix-based Quality Function Deployment (QFD) methodology for analysis, decision making and communication. This method can complement standard diagramming enterprise architecture methods. Although QFD was initially created for product design, it has many applications in strategy deployment. But in spite of a longstanding history, elements chosen for strategic QFD vary and are poorly aligned with existing business architecture concepts. In order to clarify the link between the suggested QFD method and business architecture elements, a meta-model is suggested, which specifies the contents of the matrices. The suggested meta-model is based on the existing reference ontologies and meta-models for strategic management. This ontological foundation supports knowledge sharing and applicability of the business architecture alignment method. Tool support (EAM-tool plugin) and method applications are also covered in this paper.
Applying Quality Function Deployment method for business architecture alignment from Dmitry Kudryavtsev
]]> 2436 8 https://cdn.slidesharecdn.com/ss_thumbnails/2014applyingqfdmethodforbusinessarchitecturealignmentkudryavtsevgrigorievkoryshevslideshare-140918075224-phpapp02-thumbnail.jpg?width=120&height=120&fit=bounds presentation Black http://activitystrea.ms/schema/1.0/post http://activitystrea.ms/schema/1.0/posted 0 Strategy-focused and value-oriented capabilities /slideshow/2014-strategy-focused-and-valueoriented-capabilitieskudryavtsev-grigoriev-bobrikovv4slideshare/38269582 2014strategy-focusedandvalue-orientedcapabilitieskudryavtsevgrigorievbobrikovv4slideshare-140822180240-phpapp01
Kudryavtsev D., Grigoriev L., Bobrikov S.Strategy-focused and value-oriented capabilities: methodology for linking capabilities with goals and measures // Proceedings of the 1st International Workshop on Capability-oriented Business Informatics (CoBI) as part of the 16th IEEE Conference on Business Informatics, Geneve, 14-17 July, 2014. PP. 15-26. http://cbi2014.unige.ch/ Capability-based enterprise modeling is gaining presence in business practice. Capability is the central concept of the resource-based view of a firm, and it helps to bridge strategy with business operations. The use of capabilities for behavior modeling provides flexibility, stimulates reuse, and helps the firm to focus on its core competencies. In order to benefit from this approach, capabilities must be strategy-focused and value-oriented. In other words, strategic goals and measures must be linked to capabilities. The paper provides a methodology to solve this task, which integrates a set of principles (way of thinking), a step-by-step method (way of working), viewpoints, and a meta-model (way of modeling). The article also points to the enterprise architecture management tool, which supports the suggested methodology.]]>
Kudryavtsev D., Grigoriev L., Bobrikov S.Strategy-focused and value-oriented capabilities: methodology for linking capabilities with goals and measures // Proceedings of the 1st International Workshop on Capability-oriented Business Informatics (CoBI) as part of the 16th IEEE Conference on Business Informatics, Geneve, 14-17 July, 2014. PP. 15-26. http://cbi2014.unige.ch/ Capability-based enterprise modeling is gaining presence in business practice. Capability is the central concept of the resource-based view of a firm, and it helps to bridge strategy with business operations. The use of capabilities for behavior modeling provides flexibility, stimulates reuse, and helps the firm to focus on its core competencies. In order to benefit from this approach, capabilities must be strategy-focused and value-oriented. In other words, strategic goals and measures must be linked to capabilities. The paper provides a methodology to solve this task, which integrates a set of principles (way of thinking), a step-by-step method (way of working), viewpoints, and a meta-model (way of modeling). The article also points to the enterprise architecture management tool, which supports the suggested methodology.]]> Fri, 22 Aug 2014 18:02:40 GMT /slideshow/2014-strategy-focused-and-valueoriented-capabilitieskudryavtsev-grigoriev-bobrikovv4slideshare/38269582 dmitryku@slideshare.net(dmitryku) Strategy-focused and value-oriented capabilities dmitryku Kudryavtsev D., Grigoriev L., Bobrikov S.Strategy-focused and value-oriented capabilities: methodology for linking capabilities with goals and measures // Proceedings of the 1st International Workshop on Capability-oriented Business Informatics (CoBI) as part of the 16th IEEE Conference on Business Informatics, Geneve, 14-17 July, 2014. PP. 15-26. http://cbi2014.unige.ch/ Capability-based enterprise modeling is gaining presence in business practice. Capability is the central concept of the resource-based view of a firm, and it helps to bridge strategy with business operations. The use of capabilities for behavior modeling provides flexibility, stimulates reuse, and helps the firm to focus on its core competencies. In order to benefit from this approach, capabilities must be strategy-focused and value-oriented. In other words, strategic goals and measures must be linked to capabilities. The paper provides a methodology to solve this task, which integrates a set of principles (way of thinking), a step-by-step method (way of working), viewpoints, and a meta-model (way of modeling). The article also points to the enterprise architecture management tool, which supports the suggested methodology. <img style="border:1px solid #C3E6D8;float:right;" alt="" src="https://cdn.slidesharecdn.com/ss_thumbnails/2014strategy-focusedandvalue-orientedcapabilitieskudryavtsevgrigorievbobrikovv4slideshare-140822180240-phpapp01-thumbnail.jpg?width=120&amp;height=120&amp;fit=bounds" /><br> Kudryavtsev D., Grigoriev L., Bobrikov S.Strategy-focused and value-oriented capabilities: methodology for linking capabilities with goals and measures // Proceedings of the 1st International Workshop on Capability-oriented Business Informatics (CoBI) as part of the 16th IEEE Conference on Business Informatics, Geneve, 14-17 July, 2014. PP. 15-26. http://cbi2014.unige.ch/ Capability-based enterprise modeling is gaining presence in business practice. Capability is the central concept of the resource-based view of a firm, and it helps to bridge strategy with business operations. The use of capabilities for behavior modeling provides flexibility, stimulates reuse, and helps the firm to focus on its core competencies. In order to benefit from this approach, capabilities must be strategy-focused and value-oriented. In other words, strategic goals and measures must be linked to capabilities. The paper provides a methodology to solve this task, which integrates a set of principles (way of thinking), a step-by-step method (way of working), viewpoints, and a meta-model (way of modeling). The article also points to the enterprise architecture management tool, which supports the suggested methodology.
Strategy-focused and value-oriented capabilities from Dmitry Kudryavtsev
]]> 1614 5 https://cdn.slidesharecdn.com/ss_thumbnails/2014strategy-focusedandvalue-orientedcapabilitieskudryavtsevgrigorievbobrikovv4slideshare-140822180240-phpapp01-thumbnail.jpg?width=120&height=120&fit=bounds presentation Black http://activitystrea.ms/schema/1.0/post http://activitystrea.ms/schema/1.0/posted 0 Diagrammatic knowledge modeling for managers ontology-based approach /slideshow/diagrammatic-knowledge-modeling-for-managers-ontologybased-approach/10438036 keodslidesdiagrammaticknowledgemodelingformanagers-111202132441-phpapp02
Diagrams are an effective and popular tool for visual knowledge structuring. Managers also often use them to acquire and transfer business knowledge. There are many currently available diagrams or visual modeling languages for managerial needs, unfortunately the choice between them is frequently error-prone and inconsistent. This situation raises the next questions. What diagrams/ visual modeling languages are the most suitable for the specific type of business content? What domain-specific diagrams are the most suitable for the visualization of the particular elements of organizational ontology? In order to provide the answers, the paper suggests light-weight specification of diagrams and knowledge content types, which is based on the competency questions and ontology design patterns. The proposed approach provides the classification of qualitative business diagrams. Kudryavtsev, D. V., Gavrilova, T. A. (2011). Diagrammatic knowledge modeling for managers ontology-based approach. Accepted poster. International Conference on Knowledge engineering and Ontology Development, 26-29 October, 2011, Paris, France. P. 386-389.]]>
Diagrams are an effective and popular tool for visual knowledge structuring. Managers also often use them to acquire and transfer business knowledge. There are many currently available diagrams or visual modeling languages for managerial needs, unfortunately the choice between them is frequently error-prone and inconsistent. This situation raises the next questions. What diagrams/ visual modeling languages are the most suitable for the specific type of business content? What domain-specific diagrams are the most suitable for the visualization of the particular elements of organizational ontology? In order to provide the answers, the paper suggests light-weight specification of diagrams and knowledge content types, which is based on the competency questions and ontology design patterns. The proposed approach provides the classification of qualitative business diagrams. Kudryavtsev, D. V., Gavrilova, T. A. (2011). Diagrammatic knowledge modeling for managers ontology-based approach. Accepted poster. International Conference on Knowledge engineering and Ontology Development, 26-29 October, 2011, Paris, France. P. 386-389.]]> Fri, 02 Dec 2011 13:24:38 GMT /slideshow/diagrammatic-knowledge-modeling-for-managers-ontologybased-approach/10438036 dmitryku@slideshare.net(dmitryku) Diagrammatic knowledge modeling for managers ontology-based approach dmitryku Diagrams are an effective and popular tool for visual knowledge structuring. Managers also often use them to acquire and transfer business knowledge. There are many currently available diagrams or visual modeling languages for managerial needs, unfortunately the choice between them is frequently error-prone and inconsistent. This situation raises the next questions. What diagrams/ visual modeling languages are the most suitable for the specific type of business content? What domain-specific diagrams are the most suitable for the visualization of the particular elements of organizational ontology? In order to provide the answers, the paper suggests light-weight specification of diagrams and knowledge content types, which is based on the competency questions and ontology design patterns. The proposed approach provides the classification of qualitative business diagrams. Kudryavtsev, D. V., Gavrilova, T. A. (2011). Diagrammatic knowledge modeling for managers ontology-based approach. Accepted poster. International Conference on Knowledge engineering and Ontology Development, 26-29 October, 2011, Paris, France. P. 386-389. <img style="border:1px solid #C3E6D8;float:right;" alt="" src="https://cdn.slidesharecdn.com/ss_thumbnails/keodslidesdiagrammaticknowledgemodelingformanagers-111202132441-phpapp02-thumbnail.jpg?width=120&amp;height=120&amp;fit=bounds" /><br> Diagrams are an effective and popular tool for visual knowledge structuring. Managers also often use them to acquire and transfer business knowledge. There are many currently available diagrams or visual modeling languages for managerial needs, unfortunately the choice between them is frequently error-prone and inconsistent. This situation raises the next questions. What diagrams/ visual modeling languages are the most suitable for the specific type of business content? What domain-specific diagrams are the most suitable for the visualization of the particular elements of organizational ontology? In order to provide the answers, the paper suggests light-weight specification of diagrams and knowledge content types, which is based on the competency questions and ontology design patterns. The proposed approach provides the classification of qualitative business diagrams. Kudryavtsev, D. V., Gavrilova, T. A. (2011). Diagrammatic knowledge modeling for managers ontology-based approach. Accepted poster. International Conference on Knowledge engineering and Ontology Development, 26-29 October, 2011, Paris, France. P. 386-389.
Diagrammatic knowledge modeling for managers ontology-based approach from Dmitry Kudryavtsev
]]> 1528 3 https://cdn.slidesharecdn.com/ss_thumbnails/keodslidesdiagrammaticknowledgemodelingformanagers-111202132441-phpapp02-thumbnail.jpg?width=120&height=120&fit=bounds presentation White http://activitystrea.ms/schema/1.0/post http://activitystrea.ms/schema/1.0/posted 0 The Ontology-based Business Architecture Engineering Framework /slideshow/the-ontologybased-business-architecture-engineering-framework/10262483 2011sometpresentationkudryavtsevgrigoriev-111121185916-phpapp01
Business architecture became a well-known tool for business transformations. According to a recent study by Forrester, 50 percent of the companies polled claimed to have an active business architecture initiative, whereas 20 percent were planning to engage in business architecture work in the near future. However, despite the high interest in BA, there is not yet a common understanding of the main concepts. There is a lack for the business architecture framework which provides a complete metamodel, suggests methodology for business architecture development and enables tool support for it. The ORGMaster framework is designed to solve this problem using the ontology as a core of the metamodel. This paper describes the ORG-Master framework, its implementation and dissemination. the presentation was given within the SOMET 2011 conference: http://www.somet.soft.iwate-pu.ac.jp/somet_11/ see the text in proceedings here: http://www.booksonline.iospress.nl/Content/View.aspx?piid=21454 Kudryavtsev, D., & Grigoriev, L. (2011). The ontology-based business architecture engineering framework. In proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Intelligent Software Methodologies, Tools and Techniques (SOMET), September 28-30, 2011, Saint-Petersburg, Russia. P. 233-252.]]>
Business architecture became a well-known tool for business transformations. According to a recent study by Forrester, 50 percent of the companies polled claimed to have an active business architecture initiative, whereas 20 percent were planning to engage in business architecture work in the near future. However, despite the high interest in BA, there is not yet a common understanding of the main concepts. There is a lack for the business architecture framework which provides a complete metamodel, suggests methodology for business architecture development and enables tool support for it. The ORGMaster framework is designed to solve this problem using the ontology as a core of the metamodel. This paper describes the ORG-Master framework, its implementation and dissemination. the presentation was given within the SOMET 2011 conference: http://www.somet.soft.iwate-pu.ac.jp/somet_11/ see the text in proceedings here: http://www.booksonline.iospress.nl/Content/View.aspx?piid=21454 Kudryavtsev, D., & Grigoriev, L. (2011). The ontology-based business architecture engineering framework. In proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Intelligent Software Methodologies, Tools and Techniques (SOMET), September 28-30, 2011, Saint-Petersburg, Russia. P. 233-252.]]> Mon, 21 Nov 2011 18:59:15 GMT /slideshow/the-ontologybased-business-architecture-engineering-framework/10262483 dmitryku@slideshare.net(dmitryku) The Ontology-based Business Architecture Engineering Framework dmitryku Business architecture became a well-known tool for business transformations. According to a recent study by Forrester, 50 percent of the companies polled claimed to have an active business architecture initiative, whereas 20 percent were planning to engage in business architecture work in the near future. However, despite the high interest in BA, there is not yet a common understanding of the main concepts. There is a lack for the business architecture framework which provides a complete metamodel, suggests methodology for business architecture development and enables tool support for it. The ORGMaster framework is designed to solve this problem using the ontology as a core of the metamodel. This paper describes the ORG-Master framework, its implementation and dissemination. the presentation was given within the SOMET 2011 conference: http://www.somet.soft.iwate-pu.ac.jp/somet_11/ see the text in proceedings here: http://www.booksonline.iospress.nl/Content/View.aspx?piid=21454 Kudryavtsev, D., & Grigoriev, L. (2011). The ontology-based business architecture engineering framework. In proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Intelligent Software Methodologies, Tools and Techniques (SOMET), September 28-30, 2011, Saint-Petersburg, Russia. P. 233-252. <img style="border:1px solid #C3E6D8;float:right;" alt="" src="https://cdn.slidesharecdn.com/ss_thumbnails/2011sometpresentationkudryavtsevgrigoriev-111121185916-phpapp01-thumbnail.jpg?width=120&amp;height=120&amp;fit=bounds" /><br> Business architecture became a well-known tool for business transformations. According to a recent study by Forrester, 50 percent of the companies polled claimed to have an active business architecture initiative, whereas 20 percent were planning to engage in business architecture work in the near future. However, despite the high interest in BA, there is not yet a common understanding of the main concepts. There is a lack for the business architecture framework which provides a complete metamodel, suggests methodology for business architecture development and enables tool support for it. The ORGMaster framework is designed to solve this problem using the ontology as a core of the metamodel. This paper describes the ORG-Master framework, its implementation and dissemination. the presentation was given within the SOMET 2011 conference: http://www.somet.soft.iwate-pu.ac.jp/somet_11/ see the text in proceedings here: http://www.booksonline.iospress.nl/Content/View.aspx?piid=21454 Kudryavtsev, D., &amp; Grigoriev, L. (2011). The ontology-based business architecture engineering framework. In proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Intelligent Software Methodologies, Tools and Techniques (SOMET), September 28-30, 2011, Saint-Petersburg, Russia. P. 233-252.
The Ontology-based Business Architecture Engineering Framework from Dmitry Kudryavtsev
]]> 2083 7 https://cdn.slidesharecdn.com/ss_thumbnails/2011sometpresentationkudryavtsevgrigoriev-111121185916-phpapp01-thumbnail.jpg?width=120&height=120&fit=bounds presentation White http://activitystrea.ms/schema/1.0/post http://activitystrea.ms/schema/1.0/posted 0 Systemic approach towards enterprise functional decomposition /slideshow/systemic-approach-towards-enterprise-functional-decomposition/9255031 2011enterprisefunctionaldecompositionceckudryavtsevgrigoriev-110914074141-phpapp02
Kudryavtsev, D., & Grigoriev, L. (2011). Systemic approach towards enterprise functional decomposition. The proceedings of the Workshop Convergence of Business Architecture, Business Process Architecture, Enterprise Architecture and Service Oriented Architecture within the 13-th IEEE Conference on Commerce and Enterprise Computing (CEC), September 5-7, 2011, Luxemborg. P. 310-317.]]>
Kudryavtsev, D., & Grigoriev, L. (2011). Systemic approach towards enterprise functional decomposition. The proceedings of the Workshop Convergence of Business Architecture, Business Process Architecture, Enterprise Architecture and Service Oriented Architecture within the 13-th IEEE Conference on Commerce and Enterprise Computing (CEC), September 5-7, 2011, Luxemborg. P. 310-317.]]> Wed, 14 Sep 2011 07:41:38 GMT /slideshow/systemic-approach-towards-enterprise-functional-decomposition/9255031 dmitryku@slideshare.net(dmitryku) Systemic approach towards enterprise functional decomposition dmitryku Kudryavtsev, D., & Grigoriev, L. (2011). Systemic approach towards enterprise functional decomposition. The proceedings of the Workshop Convergence of Business Architecture, Business Process Architecture, Enterprise Architecture and Service Oriented Architecture within the 13-th IEEE Conference on Commerce and Enterprise Computing (CEC), September 5-7, 2011, Luxemborg. P. 310-317. <img style="border:1px solid #C3E6D8;float:right;" alt="" src="https://cdn.slidesharecdn.com/ss_thumbnails/2011enterprisefunctionaldecompositionceckudryavtsevgrigoriev-110914074141-phpapp02-thumbnail.jpg?width=120&amp;height=120&amp;fit=bounds" /><br> Kudryavtsev, D., &amp; Grigoriev, L. (2011). Systemic approach towards enterprise functional decomposition. The proceedings of the Workshop Convergence of Business Architecture, Business Process Architecture, Enterprise Architecture and Service Oriented Architecture within the 13-th IEEE Conference on Commerce and Enterprise Computing (CEC), September 5-7, 2011, Luxemborg. P. 310-317.
Systemic approach towards enterprise functional decomposition from Dmitry Kudryavtsev
]]> 5630 9 https://cdn.slidesharecdn.com/ss_thumbnails/2011enterprisefunctionaldecompositionceckudryavtsevgrigoriev-110914074141-phpapp02-thumbnail.jpg?width=120&height=120&fit=bounds presentation Black http://activitystrea.ms/schema/1.0/post http://activitystrea.ms/schema/1.0/posted 0 From context to knowledge: consecutive mapping ontologies and contexts /slideshow/from-context-to-knowledge-consecutive-mapping-ontologies-and-contexts-9254357/9254357 2006knowledgenavigatori-knowkudryavtsev-110914064751-phpapp01
Kudryavtsev, D. V. (2006). From context to knowledge: consecutive mapping ontologies and contexts, In: Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Knowledge Management, 6-8 September, 2006, Graz, Austria. Graz: J.UCS. P. 97-104.]]>
Kudryavtsev, D. V. (2006). From context to knowledge: consecutive mapping ontologies and contexts, In: Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Knowledge Management, 6-8 September, 2006, Graz, Austria. Graz: J.UCS. P. 97-104.]]> Wed, 14 Sep 2011 06:47:48 GMT /slideshow/from-context-to-knowledge-consecutive-mapping-ontologies-and-contexts-9254357/9254357 dmitryku@slideshare.net(dmitryku) From context to knowledge: consecutive mapping ontologies and contexts dmitryku Kudryavtsev, D. V. (2006). From context to knowledge: consecutive mapping ontologies and contexts, In: Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Knowledge Management, 6-8 September, 2006, Graz, Austria. Graz: J.UCS. P. 97-104. <img style="border:1px solid #C3E6D8;float:right;" alt="" src="https://cdn.slidesharecdn.com/ss_thumbnails/2006knowledgenavigatori-knowkudryavtsev-110914064751-phpapp01-thumbnail.jpg?width=120&amp;height=120&amp;fit=bounds" /><br> Kudryavtsev, D. V. (2006). From context to knowledge: consecutive mapping ontologies and contexts, In: Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Knowledge Management, 6-8 September, 2006, Graz, Austria. Graz: J.UCS. P. 97-104.
From context to knowledge: consecutive mapping ontologies and contexts from Dmitry Kudryavtsev
]]> 508 1 https://cdn.slidesharecdn.com/ss_thumbnails/2006knowledgenavigatori-knowkudryavtsev-110914064751-phpapp01-thumbnail.jpg?width=120&height=120&fit=bounds presentation White http://activitystrea.ms/schema/1.0/post http://activitystrea.ms/schema/1.0/posted 0 https://cdn.slidesharecdn.com/profile-photo-dmitryku-48x48.jpg?cb=1729114553 The head of methodology and R&D at Digital City Planner Oy, a startup company from Helsinki. 15+ years of experience in knowledge organization, ontologies, organizational modeling, and enterprise architecture. Expertise in research, consulting, and training. https://cdn.slidesharecdn.com/ss_thumbnails/2020specifyingk-mapsthroughontologyengineeringifkadslides-241016213922-c925c769-thumbnail.jpg?width=320&height=320&fit=bounds slideshow/2020_specifying-k-maps-through-ontology-engineering_ifkad/272476471 2020_Specifying K-maps... https://cdn.slidesharecdn.com/ss_thumbnails/ilogbir2022mapofthemapskudryavtsevv2-220929130844-75c4ac2b-thumbnail.jpg?width=320&height=320&fit=bounds slideshow/map-of-the-maps-conceptualization-of-the-knowledge-maps/253257562 Map of the Maps: Conce... https://cdn.slidesharecdn.com/ss_thumbnails/2017takeeaforstrategicmanagementpres-180902205821-thumbnail.jpg?width=320&height=320&fit=bounds dmitryku/using-enterprise-architecture-management-methods-and-technologies-for-knowledge-structuring-in-strategic-management Using Enterprise Archi...