�ݺ�ߣshows by User: ivogrigorov

�ݺ�ߣshows by User: ivogrigorov / http://www.slideshare.net/images/logo.gif �ݺ�ߣshows by User: ivogrigorov / Sun, 24 Mar 2019 21:18:49 GMT �ݺ�ߣShare feed for �ݺ�ߣshows by User: ivogrigorov Librarians role in operationalising open science /slideshow/librarians-role-in-operationalising-open-science/137966268 librariansroleinoperationalisingopenscience-190324211850
Open Science is a paradigm shift and Culture Change, but none of us in academia are Change Management-trained! The presentation offers some basic opportunities for librarians to operationalise Open Science.]]>
Open Science is a paradigm shift and Culture Change, but none of us in academia are Change Management-trained! The presentation offers some basic opportunities for librarians to operationalise Open Science.]]> Sun, 24 Mar 2019 21:18:49 GMT /slideshow/librarians-role-in-operationalising-open-science/137966268 ivogrigorov@slideshare.net(ivogrigorov) Librarians role in operationalising open science ivogrigorov Open Science is a paradigm shift and Culture Change, but none of us in academia are Change Management-trained! The presentation offers some basic opportunities for librarians to operationalise Open Science. <img style="border:1px solid #C3E6D8;float:right;" alt="" src="https://cdn.slidesharecdn.com/ss_thumbnails/librariansroleinoperationalisingopenscience-190324211850-thumbnail.jpg?width=120&height=120&fit=bounds" /> Open Science is a paradigm shift and Culture Change, but none of us in academia are Change Management-trained! The presentation offers some basic opportunities for librarians to operationalise Open Science.

Librarians role in operationalising open science from Ivo Grigorov

]]> 224 4 https://cdn.slidesharecdn.com/ss_thumbnails/librariansroleinoperationalisingopenscience-190324211850-thumbnail.jpg?width=120&height=120&fit=bounds presentation Black http://activitystrea.ms/schema/1.0/post

http://activitystrea.ms/schema/1.0/posted

0 Winning Marie Curie with Open Science 2018 /slideshow/winning-marie-curie-with-open-science-2018/97090814 winningmariecuriewithopenscience-180514213640
To support the announcement of the Marie Curie Individual Fellowships call, MCAA, EuroScientist and Horizon 2020 FOSTER+ are following up on the recent “Responsible Research & Innovation Check-Up” webinar with the Open Science CLINIQUE. The slides offer a brief analysis of the Marie Curie Individual Fellowship proposal template, and maps all sections where Open Science can add a competitive edge to the proposal.]]>
To support the announcement of the Marie Curie Individual Fellowships call, MCAA, EuroScientist and Horizon 2020 FOSTER+ are following up on the recent “Responsible Research & Innovation Check-Up” webinar with the Open Science CLINIQUE. The slides offer a brief analysis of the Marie Curie Individual Fellowship proposal template, and maps all sections where Open Science can add a competitive edge to the proposal.]]> Mon, 14 May 2018 21:36:40 GMT /slideshow/winning-marie-curie-with-open-science-2018/97090814 ivogrigorov@slideshare.net(ivogrigorov) Winning Marie Curie with Open Science 2018 ivogrigorov To support the announcement of the Marie Curie Individual Fellowships call, MCAA, EuroScientist and Horizon 2020 FOSTER+ are following up on the recent “Responsible Research & Innovation Check-Up” webinar with the Open Science CLINIQUE. The slides offer a brief analysis of the Marie Curie Individual Fellowship proposal template, and maps all sections where Open Science can add a competitive edge to the proposal. <img style="border:1px solid #C3E6D8;float:right;" alt="" src="https://cdn.slidesharecdn.com/ss_thumbnails/winningmariecuriewithopenscience-180514213640-thumbnail.jpg?width=120&height=120&fit=bounds" /> To support the announcement of the Marie Curie Individual Fellowships call, MCAA, EuroScientist and Horizon 2020 FOSTER+ are following up on the recent “Responsible Research & Innovation Check-Up” webinar with the Open Science CLINIQUE. The slides offer a brief analysis of the Marie Curie Individual Fellowship proposal template, and maps all sections where Open Science can add a competitive edge to the proposal.

Winning Marie Curie with Open Science 2018 from Ivo Grigorov

]]> 1323 11 https://cdn.slidesharecdn.com/ss_thumbnails/winningmariecuriewithopenscience-180514213640-thumbnail.jpg?width=120&height=120&fit=bounds presentation Black http://activitystrea.ms/schema/1.0/post

http://activitystrea.ms/schema/1.0/posted

0 Open science in Natural Sciences /slideshow/open-science-in-natural-sciences/81094387 openscienceinnaturalsciences-171023092701
Natural Science and Open Science Tools and Workflows. The slides are part of a the OpenAIRE Webinar Series in support of Open Access Week 2017. Content is prepared by Jon Tennant (Protohedgehog) and Ivo Grigorov (@OAforClimate). Feel free to re-use as needed. CC-BY ]]>
Natural Science and Open Science Tools and Workflows. The slides are part of a the OpenAIRE Webinar Series in support of Open Access Week 2017. Content is prepared by Jon Tennant (Protohedgehog) and Ivo Grigorov (@OAforClimate). Feel free to re-use as needed. CC-BY ]]> Mon, 23 Oct 2017 09:27:01 GMT /slideshow/open-science-in-natural-sciences/81094387 ivogrigorov@slideshare.net(ivogrigorov) Open science in Natural Sciences ivogrigorov Natural Science and Open Science Tools and Workflows. The slides are part of a the OpenAIRE Webinar Series in support of Open Access Week 2017. Content is prepared by Jon Tennant (Protohedgehog) and Ivo Grigorov (@OAforClimate). Feel free to re-use as needed. CC-BY <img style="border:1px solid #C3E6D8;float:right;" alt="" src="https://cdn.slidesharecdn.com/ss_thumbnails/openscienceinnaturalsciences-171023092701-thumbnail.jpg?width=120&height=120&fit=bounds" /> Natural Science and Open Science Tools and Workflows. The slides are part of a the OpenAIRE Webinar Series in support of Open Access Week 2017. Content is prepared by Jon Tennant (Protohedgehog) and Ivo Grigorov (@OAforClimate). Feel free to re-use as needed. CC-BY

Open science in Natural Sciences from Ivo Grigorov

]]> 420 4 https://cdn.slidesharecdn.com/ss_thumbnails/openscienceinnaturalsciences-171023092701-thumbnail.jpg?width=120&height=120&fit=bounds presentation Black http://activitystrea.ms/schema/1.0/post

http://activitystrea.ms/schema/1.0/posted

0 LEARN-TEACH Pilot for More Competitive Grants /slideshow/learnteach-pilot-for-more-competitive-grants/75708714 learnteachpilotformorecompetitivegrants-170505124548
A pilot for mutual researcher-teacher professional development, and insertion of new research on Societal Challenges in school curricula. The pilot increases research grant competitiveness if well integrated in the Outreach & Dissemination Strategy of the proposal, and coupled to an Open Science policy. ]]>
A pilot for mutual researcher-teacher professional development, and insertion of new research on Societal Challenges in school curricula. The pilot increases research grant competitiveness if well integrated in the Outreach & Dissemination Strategy of the proposal, and coupled to an Open Science policy. ]]> Fri, 05 May 2017 12:45:48 GMT /slideshow/learnteach-pilot-for-more-competitive-grants/75708714 ivogrigorov@slideshare.net(ivogrigorov) LEARN-TEACH Pilot for More Competitive Grants ivogrigorov A pilot for mutual researcher-teacher professional development, and insertion of new research on Societal Challenges in school curricula. The pilot increases research grant competitiveness if well integrated in the Outreach & Dissemination Strategy of the proposal, and coupled to an Open Science policy. <img style="border:1px solid #C3E6D8;float:right;" alt="" src="https://cdn.slidesharecdn.com/ss_thumbnails/learnteachpilotformorecompetitivegrants-170505124548-thumbnail.jpg?width=120&height=120&fit=bounds" /> A pilot for mutual researcher-teacher professional development, and insertion of new research on Societal Challenges in school curricula. The pilot increases research grant competitiveness if well integrated in the Outreach & Dissemination Strategy of the proposal, and coupled to an Open Science policy.

LEARN-TEACH Pilot for More Competitive Grants from Ivo Grigorov

]]> 777 6 https://cdn.slidesharecdn.com/ss_thumbnails/learnteachpilotformorecompetitivegrants-170505124548-thumbnail.jpg?width=120&height=120&fit=bounds presentation Black http://activitystrea.ms/schema/1.0/post

http://activitystrea.ms/schema/1.0/posted

0 Passive Vs Active Knowledge Exchange /slideshow/passive-vs-active-knowledge-exchange/75676123 passiveactiveknowledgeexchange-170504134534
Research funders are increasingly concerned with measurable socio-economic impact of investment in research, and on increasingly shorter timescales. Innovation, and “open innovation” are the policy priorities of the moment and optimising the flow of ideas along the lab-2-market spectrum is essential for re-use of results, fueling open innovation, and boosting socio-economic impact or public funded research. The presentation showcases two complimentary strategies that Project Managers can employ pre- and/or post-award in order to optimise the exploitation and impact of research project: passive and active knowledge transfer. Passive Knowledge Transfer relies on maximum disclosure of research output (other than commercially exploitable research via patents and other IPR) in the interest of optimal reproducibility, independent validation and re-use by both academic and non-academic users, without necessarily targeting specific users. Tools of the trade include standard public & academic dissemination means (research articles, online media publications, newsletters, generic policy briefs). Additional transparency of the research workflow can be achieved by integrating “open science” (open notebooks, open data, open research software and open access to research publications) as well as Virtual Research Environments (VREs) in the methodology of the proposed work. Ensuring that the proposal partners are suitably trained in best practices of open science, makes proposal grant more competitive at evaluation and the resulting maximum access to research outputs does contribute to better return on investment for funders (Beagrie 2016) and economic growth objectives of public s e.g. Blue Growth (Houghton & Swan 2011, Marine Knowledge 2020 Roadmap). Active Knowledge Transfer, or the pro-active translation of research into policy or commercial context, is the more classical and better known approach (also referred to as extension services, or researchers providing advice e.g. to fisheries and aquaculture governance bodies and private sector). Horizon2020 COLUMBUS Consortium proposes and tests a methodology for categorizing the diverse output of research into verifiable “knowledge outputs” , and documenting the execution of an transfer plan to very specific and identified potential users, in order to transfer knowledge along the lab-2-market spectrum. The presentation will demonstrate how Open Science and detailed knowledge transfer plans complement each other, enhance grant proposal evaluation pre- and post-award, and can address Blue Growth policy objectives. Concepts presented are developed by FP7/H2020 FOSTER+ (www.fosteropenscience.eu), H2020 COLUMBUS (www.columbusproject.eu) and H2020 SeaCHANGE (www.seachangeproject.eu)]]>
Research funders are increasingly concerned with measurable socio-economic impact of investment in research, and on increasingly shorter timescales. Innovation, and “open innovation” are the policy priorities of the moment and optimising the flow of ideas along the lab-2-market spectrum is essential for re-use of results, fueling open innovation, and boosting socio-economic impact or public funded research. The presentation showcases two complimentary strategies that Project Managers can employ pre- and/or post-award in order to optimise the exploitation and impact of research project: passive and active knowledge transfer. Passive Knowledge Transfer relies on maximum disclosure of research output (other than commercially exploitable research via patents and other IPR) in the interest of optimal reproducibility, independent validation and re-use by both academic and non-academic users, without necessarily targeting specific users. Tools of the trade include standard public & academic dissemination means (research articles, online media publications, newsletters, generic policy briefs). Additional transparency of the research workflow can be achieved by integrating “open science” (open notebooks, open data, open research software and open access to research publications) as well as Virtual Research Environments (VREs) in the methodology of the proposed work. Ensuring that the proposal partners are suitably trained in best practices of open science, makes proposal grant more competitive at evaluation and the resulting maximum access to research outputs does contribute to better return on investment for funders (Beagrie 2016) and economic growth objectives of public s e.g. Blue Growth (Houghton & Swan 2011, Marine Knowledge 2020 Roadmap). Active Knowledge Transfer, or the pro-active translation of research into policy or commercial context, is the more classical and better known approach (also referred to as extension services, or researchers providing advice e.g. to fisheries and aquaculture governance bodies and private sector). Horizon2020 COLUMBUS Consortium proposes and tests a methodology for categorizing the diverse output of research into verifiable “knowledge outputs” , and documenting the execution of an transfer plan to very specific and identified potential users, in order to transfer knowledge along the lab-2-market spectrum. The presentation will demonstrate how Open Science and detailed knowledge transfer plans complement each other, enhance grant proposal evaluation pre- and post-award, and can address Blue Growth policy objectives. Concepts presented are developed by FP7/H2020 FOSTER+ (www.fosteropenscience.eu), H2020 COLUMBUS (www.columbusproject.eu) and H2020 SeaCHANGE (www.seachangeproject.eu)]]> Thu, 04 May 2017 13:45:34 GMT /slideshow/passive-vs-active-knowledge-exchange/75676123 ivogrigorov@slideshare.net(ivogrigorov) Passive Vs Active Knowledge Exchange ivogrigorov Research funders are increasingly concerned with measurable socio-economic impact of investment in research, and on increasingly shorter timescales. Innovation, and “open innovation” are the policy priorities of the moment and optimising the flow of ideas along the lab-2-market spectrum is essential for re-use of results, fueling open innovation, and boosting socio-economic impact or public funded research. The presentation showcases two complimentary strategies that Project Managers can employ pre- and/or post-award in order to optimise the exploitation and impact of research project: passive and active knowledge transfer. Passive Knowledge Transfer relies on maximum disclosure of research output (other than commercially exploitable research via patents and other IPR) in the interest of optimal reproducibility, independent validation and re-use by both academic and non-academic users, without necessarily targeting specific users. Tools of the trade include standard public & academic dissemination means (research articles, online media publications, newsletters, generic policy briefs). Additional transparency of the research workflow can be achieved by integrating “open science” (open notebooks, open data, open research software and open access to research publications) as well as Virtual Research Environments (VREs) in the methodology of the proposed work. Ensuring that the proposal partners are suitably trained in best practices of open science, makes proposal grant more competitive at evaluation and the resulting maximum access to research outputs does contribute to better return on investment for funders (Beagrie 2016) and economic growth objectives of public s e.g. Blue Growth (Houghton & Swan 2011, Marine Knowledge 2020 Roadmap). Active Knowledge Transfer, or the pro-active translation of research into policy or commercial context, is the more classical and better known approach (also referred to as extension services, or researchers providing advice e.g. to fisheries and aquaculture governance bodies and private sector). Horizon2020 COLUMBUS Consortium proposes and tests a methodology for categorizing the diverse output of research into verifiable “knowledge outputs” , and documenting the execution of an transfer plan to very specific and identified potential users, in order to transfer knowledge along the lab-2-market spectrum. The presentation will demonstrate how Open Science and detailed knowledge transfer plans complement each other, enhance grant proposal evaluation pre- and post-award, and can address Blue Growth policy objectives. Concepts presented are developed by FP7/H2020 FOSTER+ (www.fosteropenscience.eu), H2020 COLUMBUS (www.columbusproject.eu) and H2020 SeaCHANGE (www.seachangeproject.eu) <img style="border:1px solid #C3E6D8;float:right;" alt="" src="https://cdn.slidesharecdn.com/ss_thumbnails/passiveactiveknowledgeexchange-170504134534-thumbnail.jpg?width=120&height=120&fit=bounds" /> Research funders are increasingly concerned with measurable socio-economic impact of investment in research, and on increasingly shorter timescales. Innovation, and “open innovation” are the policy priorities of the moment and optimising the flow of ideas along the lab-2-market spectrum is essential for re-use of results, fueling open innovation, and boosting socio-economic impact or public funded research. The presentation showcases two complimentary strategies that Project Managers can employ pre- and/or post-award in order to optimise the exploitation and impact of research project: passive and active knowledge transfer. Passive Knowledge Transfer relies on maximum disclosure of research output (other than commercially exploitable research via patents and other IPR) in the interest of optimal reproducibility, independent validation and re-use by both academic and non-academic users, without necessarily targeting specific users. Tools of the trade include standard public & academic dissemination means (research articles, online media publications, newsletters, generic policy briefs). Additional transparency of the research workflow can be achieved by integrating “open science” (open notebooks, open data, open research software and open access to research publications) as well as Virtual Research Environments (VREs) in the methodology of the proposed work. Ensuring that the proposal partners are suitably trained in best practices of open science, makes proposal grant more competitive at evaluation and the resulting maximum access to research outputs does contribute to better return on investment for funders (Beagrie 2016) and economic growth objectives of public s e.g. Blue Growth (Houghton & Swan 2011, Marine Knowledge 2020 Roadmap). Active Knowledge Transfer, or the pro-active translation of research into policy or commercial context, is the more classical and better known approach (also referred to as extension services, or researchers providing advice e.g. to fisheries and aquaculture governance bodies and private sector). Horizon2020 COLUMBUS Consortium proposes and tests a methodology for categorizing the diverse output of research into verifiable “knowledge outputs” , and documenting the execution of an transfer plan to very specific and identified potential users, in order to transfer knowledge along the lab-2-market spectrum. The presentation will demonstrate how Open Science and detailed knowledge transfer plans complement each other, enhance grant proposal evaluation pre- and post-award, and can address Blue Growth policy objectives. Concepts presented are developed by FP7/H2020 FOSTER+ (www.fosteropenscience.eu), H2020 COLUMBUS (www.columbusproject.eu) and H2020 SeaCHANGE (www.seachangeproject.eu)

Passive Vs Active Knowledge Exchange from Ivo Grigorov

]]> 1298 5 https://cdn.slidesharecdn.com/ss_thumbnails/passiveactiveknowledgeexchange-170504134534-thumbnail.jpg?width=120&height=120&fit=bounds presentation Black http://activitystrea.ms/schema/1.0/post

http://activitystrea.ms/schema/1.0/posted

0 Does open science matter at proposal evaluation /slideshow/does-open-science-matter-at-proposal-evaluation/69429501 doesopensciencematteratproposalevaluation-161122232520
"Winning Horizon2020 with Open Science" (doi 10.5281/zenodo.12247) brief was integrated in Marie Curie ETNs and Societal Challenge 2 & 5 proposals in order to test whether Open Science can give applicants a competitive edge. These slides offer preliminary extracts from 2015-2016 Evaluation Summary Reports (ESR).]]>
"Winning Horizon2020 with Open Science" (doi 10.5281/zenodo.12247) brief was integrated in Marie Curie ETNs and Societal Challenge 2 & 5 proposals in order to test whether Open Science can give applicants a competitive edge. These slides offer preliminary extracts from 2015-2016 Evaluation Summary Reports (ESR).]]> Tue, 22 Nov 2016 23:25:20 GMT /slideshow/does-open-science-matter-at-proposal-evaluation/69429501 ivogrigorov@slideshare.net(ivogrigorov) Does open science matter at proposal evaluation ivogrigorov "Winning Horizon2020 with Open Science" (doi 10.5281/zenodo.12247) brief was integrated in Marie Curie ETNs and Societal Challenge 2 & 5 proposals in order to test whether Open Science can give applicants a competitive edge. These slides offer preliminary extracts from 2015-2016 Evaluation Summary Reports (ESR). <img style="border:1px solid #C3E6D8;float:right;" alt="" src="https://cdn.slidesharecdn.com/ss_thumbnails/doesopensciencematteratproposalevaluation-161122232520-thumbnail.jpg?width=120&height=120&fit=bounds" /> "Winning Horizon2020 with Open Science" (doi 10.5281/zenodo.12247) brief was integrated in Marie Curie ETNs and Societal Challenge 2 & 5 proposals in order to test whether Open Science can give applicants a competitive edge. These slides offer preliminary extracts from 2015-2016 Evaluation Summary Reports (ESR).

Does open science matter at proposal evaluation from Ivo Grigorov

]]> 2047 6 https://cdn.slidesharecdn.com/ss_thumbnails/doesopensciencematteratproposalevaluation-161122232520-thumbnail.jpg?width=120&height=120&fit=bounds presentation Black http://activitystrea.ms/schema/1.0/post

http://activitystrea.ms/schema/1.0/posted

0 Winning research proposals with open science /ivogrigorov/winning-proposals-with-open-science winningproposalswithopenscience-141020143633-conversion-gate01
Open Science is now mandated by European Commissions Research Framework Programme Horizon 2020, offering pro-active Open Science practioners to be more competitive at research proposals, with respect to Impact. The presentation offers evidence that Open Science can support economic growth and innovation, and how to place research proposals in context of political directives that shape Horizon2020 evaluation criteria. The presentation is based on "Winning Horizon 2020 research proposals with Open Science" http://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.12247]]>
Open Science is now mandated by European Commissions Research Framework Programme Horizon 2020, offering pro-active Open Science practioners to be more competitive at research proposals, with respect to Impact. The presentation offers evidence that Open Science can support economic growth and innovation, and how to place research proposals in context of political directives that shape Horizon2020 evaluation criteria. The presentation is based on "Winning Horizon 2020 research proposals with Open Science" http://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.12247]]> Mon, 20 Oct 2014 14:36:33 GMT /ivogrigorov/winning-proposals-with-open-science ivogrigorov@slideshare.net(ivogrigorov) Winning research proposals with open science ivogrigorov Open Science is now mandated by European Commissions Research Framework Programme Horizon 2020, offering pro-active Open Science practioners to be more competitive at research proposals, with respect to Impact. The presentation offers evidence that Open Science can support economic growth and innovation, and how to place research proposals in context of political directives that shape Horizon2020 evaluation criteria. The presentation is based on "Winning Horizon 2020 research proposals with Open Science" http://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.12247 <img style="border:1px solid #C3E6D8;float:right;" alt="" src="https://cdn.slidesharecdn.com/ss_thumbnails/winningproposalswithopenscience-141020143633-conversion-gate01-thumbnail.jpg?width=120&height=120&fit=bounds" /> Open Science is now mandated by European Commissions Research Framework Programme Horizon 2020, offering pro-active Open Science practioners to be more competitive at research proposals, with respect to Impact. The presentation offers evidence that Open Science can support economic growth and innovation, and how to place research proposals in context of political directives that shape Horizon2020 evaluation criteria. The presentation is based on "Winning Horizon 2020 research proposals with Open Science" http://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.12247

Winning research proposals with open science from Ivo Grigorov

]]> 5621 10 https://cdn.slidesharecdn.com/ss_thumbnails/winningproposalswithopenscience-141020143633-conversion-gate01-thumbnail.jpg?width=120&height=120&fit=bounds presentation Black http://activitystrea.ms/schema/1.0/post

http://activitystrea.ms/schema/1.0/posted

0 Open Science by default in Doctoral Schools? /slideshow/open-science-by-default/40505788 whydoctoralschoolsshouldtrainopensciencebydefault-141020142112-conversion-gate01
Open Scholarship (Open Science, Open Educational Resources) delivers directly to individual researcher`s objectives for impact and tenure evaluation, to the research institutions` objectives on innovative education and excellence research, so can Graduate Schools afford not to train all future graduates in "Open" practices alongside research excellence?]]>
Open Scholarship (Open Science, Open Educational Resources) delivers directly to individual researcher`s objectives for impact and tenure evaluation, to the research institutions` objectives on innovative education and excellence research, so can Graduate Schools afford not to train all future graduates in "Open" practices alongside research excellence?]]> Mon, 20 Oct 2014 14:21:12 GMT /slideshow/open-science-by-default/40505788 ivogrigorov@slideshare.net(ivogrigorov) Open Science by default in Doctoral Schools? ivogrigorov Open Scholarship (Open Science, Open Educational Resources) delivers directly to individual researcher`s objectives for impact and tenure evaluation, to the research institutions` objectives on innovative education and excellence research, so can Graduate Schools afford not to train all future graduates in "Open" practices alongside research excellence? <img style="border:1px solid #C3E6D8;float:right;" alt="" src="https://cdn.slidesharecdn.com/ss_thumbnails/whydoctoralschoolsshouldtrainopensciencebydefault-141020142112-conversion-gate01-thumbnail.jpg?width=120&height=120&fit=bounds" /> Open Scholarship (Open Science, Open Educational Resources) delivers directly to individual researcher`s objectives for impact and tenure evaluation, to the research institutions` objectives on innovative education and excellence research, so can Graduate Schools afford not to train all future graduates in "Open" practices alongside research excellence?

Open Science by default in Doctoral Schools? from Ivo Grigorov

]]> 1094 3 https://cdn.slidesharecdn.com/ss_thumbnails/whydoctoralschoolsshouldtrainopensciencebydefault-141020142112-conversion-gate01-thumbnail.jpg?width=120&height=120&fit=bounds presentation Black http://activitystrea.ms/schema/1.0/post

http://activitystrea.ms/schema/1.0/posted

0 Open Science in Horizon 2020: Can you afford not to? /slideshow/open-science-in-horizon-2020-can-you-afford-not-to/37080890 egicg2014openscienceinh2020-140717045116-phpapp02
What is Open Science, why do public research funders care, and how can you as an applicant use it to get ahead of the competition? Horizon 2020 now mandates that Open Science is part of the Knowledge Transfer and Communication Strategies of each research project in order to support the Innovation Union's ambitions towards research fueled innovation and growth. The presentation introduces the concept to potential Horizon 2020 applicants. The work is funded by FP7 FOSTER (www.fosteropenscience.eu).]]>
What is Open Science, why do public research funders care, and how can you as an applicant use it to get ahead of the competition? Horizon 2020 now mandates that Open Science is part of the Knowledge Transfer and Communication Strategies of each research project in order to support the Innovation Union's ambitions towards research fueled innovation and growth. The presentation introduces the concept to potential Horizon 2020 applicants. The work is funded by FP7 FOSTER (www.fosteropenscience.eu).]]> Thu, 17 Jul 2014 04:51:16 GMT /slideshow/open-science-in-horizon-2020-can-you-afford-not-to/37080890 ivogrigorov@slideshare.net(ivogrigorov) Open Science in Horizon 2020: Can you afford not to? ivogrigorov What is Open Science, why do public research funders care, and how can you as an applicant use it to get ahead of the competition? Horizon 2020 now mandates that Open Science is part of the Knowledge Transfer and Communication Strategies of each research project in order to support the Innovation Union's ambitions towards research fueled innovation and growth. The presentation introduces the concept to potential Horizon 2020 applicants. The work is funded by FP7 FOSTER (www.fosteropenscience.eu). <img style="border:1px solid #C3E6D8;float:right;" alt="" src="https://cdn.slidesharecdn.com/ss_thumbnails/egicg2014openscienceinh2020-140717045116-phpapp02-thumbnail.jpg?width=120&height=120&fit=bounds" /> What is Open Science, why do public research funders care, and how can you as an applicant use it to get ahead of the competition? Horizon 2020 now mandates that Open Science is part of the Knowledge Transfer and Communication Strategies of each research project in order to support the Innovation Union's ambitions towards research fueled innovation and growth. The presentation introduces the concept to potential Horizon 2020 applicants. The work is funded by FP7 FOSTER (www.fosteropenscience.eu).

Open Science in Horizon 2020: Can you afford not to? from Ivo Grigorov

]]> 638 6 https://cdn.slidesharecdn.com/ss_thumbnails/egicg2014openscienceinh2020-140717045116-phpapp02-thumbnail.jpg?width=120&height=120&fit=bounds presentation White http://activitystrea.ms/schema/1.0/post

http://activitystrea.ms/schema/1.0/posted

0 Open Science Advocacy & e-Infrastructures: Mixing it Right /slideshow/egi-cf-2014-advocacy-e-infrastructures-mixing-it-right/37080760 egicf2014advocacye-infrastructuresmixingitright-140717044710-phpapp01
Open Science is perfectly adapted to support the basic needs for impact in a "Publish or Perish" reality, so why is community uptake low? With inertia on numerous advocacy and e-infrastructure initiatives funded by EC and national funders in the ERA, the cultural barriers and discipline-specific behaviour are becoming the bottle neck. The presentation focuses on how to get the right mix of advocacy and infrastructure development, in order to support long-term implementation of Horizon 2020 Mandate on Access to Scientific Knowledge (Grant Agreement Article 29.1-6). The work is funded by FP7 FOSTER (www.fosteropenscience.eu). ]]>
Open Science is perfectly adapted to support the basic needs for impact in a "Publish or Perish" reality, so why is community uptake low? With inertia on numerous advocacy and e-infrastructure initiatives funded by EC and national funders in the ERA, the cultural barriers and discipline-specific behaviour are becoming the bottle neck. The presentation focuses on how to get the right mix of advocacy and infrastructure development, in order to support long-term implementation of Horizon 2020 Mandate on Access to Scientific Knowledge (Grant Agreement Article 29.1-6). The work is funded by FP7 FOSTER (www.fosteropenscience.eu). ]]> Thu, 17 Jul 2014 04:47:10 GMT /slideshow/egi-cf-2014-advocacy-e-infrastructures-mixing-it-right/37080760 ivogrigorov@slideshare.net(ivogrigorov) Open Science Advocacy & e-Infrastructures: Mixing it Right ivogrigorov Open Science is perfectly adapted to support the basic needs for impact in a "Publish or Perish" reality, so why is community uptake low? With inertia on numerous advocacy and e-infrastructure initiatives funded by EC and national funders in the ERA, the cultural barriers and discipline-specific behaviour are becoming the bottle neck. The presentation focuses on how to get the right mix of advocacy and infrastructure development, in order to support long-term implementation of Horizon 2020 Mandate on Access to Scientific Knowledge (Grant Agreement Article 29.1-6). The work is funded by FP7 FOSTER (www.fosteropenscience.eu). <img style="border:1px solid #C3E6D8;float:right;" alt="" src="https://cdn.slidesharecdn.com/ss_thumbnails/egicf2014advocacye-infrastructuresmixingitright-140717044710-phpapp01-thumbnail.jpg?width=120&height=120&fit=bounds" /> Open Science is perfectly adapted to support the basic needs for impact in a "Publish or Perish" reality, so why is community uptake low? With inertia on numerous advocacy and e-infrastructure initiatives funded by EC and national funders in the ERA, the cultural barriers and discipline-specific behaviour are becoming the bottle neck. The presentation focuses on how to get the right mix of advocacy and infrastructure development, in order to support long-term implementation of Horizon 2020 Mandate on Access to Scientific Knowledge (Grant Agreement Article 29.1-6). The work is funded by FP7 FOSTER (www.fosteropenscience.eu).

Open Science Advocacy & e-Infrastructures: Mixing it Right from Ivo Grigorov

]]> 469 2 https://cdn.slidesharecdn.com/ss_thumbnails/egicf2014advocacye-infrastructuresmixingitright-140717044710-phpapp01-thumbnail.jpg?width=120&height=120&fit=bounds presentation White http://activitystrea.ms/schema/1.0/post

http://activitystrea.ms/schema/1.0/posted

0 https://cdn.slidesharecdn.com/profile-photo-ivogrigorov-48x48.jpg?cb=1617800131 Trained marine scientist, currently managing a portfolio of EC-funded marine research projects. An advocate for applying #OceanLiteracy and #OpenScience principles to marine research for the benefit of peer-reviewed authors and boosting research impact and results re-use generated by research projects, leading to better return on investment for funders. dk.linkedin.com/in/ivogrigorov/ https://cdn.slidesharecdn.com/ss_thumbnails/librariansroleinoperationalisingopenscience-190324211850-thumbnail.jpg?width=320&height=320&fit=bounds slideshow/librarians-role-in-operationalising-open-science/137966268 Librarians role in ope... https://cdn.slidesharecdn.com/ss_thumbnails/winningmariecuriewithopenscience-180514213640-thumbnail.jpg?width=320&height=320&fit=bounds slideshow/winning-marie-curie-with-open-science-2018/97090814 Winning Marie Curie wi... https://cdn.slidesharecdn.com/ss_thumbnails/openscienceinnaturalsciences-171023092701-thumbnail.jpg?width=320&height=320&fit=bounds slideshow/open-science-in-natural-sciences/81094387 Open science in Natura...