�ݺ�ߣshows by User: johannesmahlich

�ݺ�ߣshows by User: johannesmahlich / http://www.slideshare.net/images/logo.gif �ݺ�ߣshows by User: johannesmahlich / Sat, 30 Nov 2013 12:37:14 GMT �ݺ�ߣShare feed for �ݺ�ߣshows by User: johannesmahlich Environmental Differentiation Strategy of Patagonia /slideshow/environmental-differentiation-strategy-of-patagonia/28764107 patagonia113013-131130123714-phpapp01
As producer of outdoor cloth Patagonia considers the environment as their most important stakeholder in their decision-making. Their environmental efforts go far beyond required law and impose extra costs on their customers. As to basic economic logic providing environmental quality beyond required law will put a company in a competitive disadvantage. Patagonia’s vision is environmental conservation and restoration. They consider their purpose of being in building the best product, cause no unnecessary harm, and use business to inspire and implement solutions to the environmental crisis. Patagonia wants to compete in the market by pursuing an environmental differentiation strategy. Patagonia’s key tactics in providing value for their stakeholders are summarized under the so-called ‘Product Lifecycle Initiative’. This initiative is a holistic commitment to lengthen the product lifecycle and reduce landfill waste. Those tactics can be categorized into what Patagonia refers to as: Reduce, repair, reuse and recycle. To reduce their customers consumption Patagonia heavily invests into R&D to produce the most durable garments. In addition, they only use organic and recycled garments to reduce the footprint of their products. Patagonia offers a free repair service for all of their products for the whole product life. Furthermore, they offer a second market where consumers can resell their used products. Patagonia encourages their customers to return Patagonia products instead of throwing them away so that they can recycle them correctly. Patagonia provides a lot of value to the environment. This value needs to be captured via the consumers. Hence, the environmental quality they provide needs to find a willingness to pay among the customers. Some, but few people buy Patagonia products for altruistic reasons because they know that buying Patagonia products will do good to the environment. Patagonia bundles the public good of environmental quality, which is difficult to charge the customer for, with the private good being product quality. They do this by constantly communicating environment friendliness together with quality. Hence, consumer value environmental friendliness for the implicit quality Patagonia offers. Another aspect to buy their products is environmental prestige. Most importantly, however, environmentalism resonates with their customer values as Patagonia’s customers, as buyers of outdoor wear, usually love the nature. The fact that environmentalism is deeply integrated into their business model makes their engagement credible and difficult to imitate by competitors. As the case of Patagonia shows basic economic logic has its limits when it comes to environmental differentiation strategies. A company can serve the environment as main stakeholder as long as it is able to capture those values perceived by the environment by finding willingness at the consumer to pay for those environmental qualities.]]>
As producer of outdoor cloth Patagonia considers the environment as their most important stakeholder in their decision-making. Their environmental efforts go far beyond required law and impose extra costs on their customers. As to basic economic logic providing environmental quality beyond required law will put a company in a competitive disadvantage. Patagonia’s vision is environmental conservation and restoration. They consider their purpose of being in building the best product, cause no unnecessary harm, and use business to inspire and implement solutions to the environmental crisis. Patagonia wants to compete in the market by pursuing an environmental differentiation strategy. Patagonia’s key tactics in providing value for their stakeholders are summarized under the so-called ‘Product Lifecycle Initiative’. This initiative is a holistic commitment to lengthen the product lifecycle and reduce landfill waste. Those tactics can be categorized into what Patagonia refers to as: Reduce, repair, reuse and recycle. To reduce their customers consumption Patagonia heavily invests into R&D to produce the most durable garments. In addition, they only use organic and recycled garments to reduce the footprint of their products. Patagonia offers a free repair service for all of their products for the whole product life. Furthermore, they offer a second market where consumers can resell their used products. Patagonia encourages their customers to return Patagonia products instead of throwing them away so that they can recycle them correctly. Patagonia provides a lot of value to the environment. This value needs to be captured via the consumers. Hence, the environmental quality they provide needs to find a willingness to pay among the customers. Some, but few people buy Patagonia products for altruistic reasons because they know that buying Patagonia products will do good to the environment. Patagonia bundles the public good of environmental quality, which is difficult to charge the customer for, with the private good being product quality. They do this by constantly communicating environment friendliness together with quality. Hence, consumer value environmental friendliness for the implicit quality Patagonia offers. Another aspect to buy their products is environmental prestige. Most importantly, however, environmentalism resonates with their customer values as Patagonia’s customers, as buyers of outdoor wear, usually love the nature. The fact that environmentalism is deeply integrated into their business model makes their engagement credible and difficult to imitate by competitors. As the case of Patagonia shows basic economic logic has its limits when it comes to environmental differentiation strategies. A company can serve the environment as main stakeholder as long as it is able to capture those values perceived by the environment by finding willingness at the consumer to pay for those environmental qualities.]]> Sat, 30 Nov 2013 12:37:14 GMT /slideshow/environmental-differentiation-strategy-of-patagonia/28764107 johannesmahlich@slideshare.net(johannesmahlich) Environmental Differentiation Strategy of Patagonia johannesmahlich As producer of outdoor cloth Patagonia considers the environment as their most important stakeholder in their decision-making. Their environmental efforts go far beyond required law and impose extra costs on their customers. As to basic economic logic providing environmental quality beyond required law will put a company in a competitive disadvantage. Patagonia’s vision is environmental conservation and restoration. They consider their purpose of being in building the best product, cause no unnecessary harm, and use business to inspire and implement solutions to the environmental crisis. Patagonia wants to compete in the market by pursuing an environmental differentiation strategy. Patagonia’s key tactics in providing value for their stakeholders are summarized under the so-called ‘Product Lifecycle Initiative’. This initiative is a holistic commitment to lengthen the product lifecycle and reduce landfill waste. Those tactics can be categorized into what Patagonia refers to as: Reduce, repair, reuse and recycle. To reduce their customers consumption Patagonia heavily invests into R&D to produce the most durable garments. In addition, they only use organic and recycled garments to reduce the footprint of their products. Patagonia offers a free repair service for all of their products for the whole product life. Furthermore, they offer a second market where consumers can resell their used products. Patagonia encourages their customers to return Patagonia products instead of throwing them away so that they can recycle them correctly. Patagonia provides a lot of value to the environment. This value needs to be captured via the consumers. Hence, the environmental quality they provide needs to find a willingness to pay among the customers. Some, but few people buy Patagonia products for altruistic reasons because they know that buying Patagonia products will do good to the environment. Patagonia bundles the public good of environmental quality, which is difficult to charge the customer for, with the private good being product quality. They do this by constantly communicating environment friendliness together with quality. Hence, consumer value environmental friendliness for the implicit quality Patagonia offers. Another aspect to buy their products is environmental prestige. Most importantly, however, environmentalism resonates with their customer values as Patagonia’s customers, as buyers of outdoor wear, usually love the nature. The fact that environmentalism is deeply integrated into their business model makes their engagement credible and difficult to imitate by competitors. As the case of Patagonia shows basic economic logic has its limits when it comes to environmental differentiation strategies. A company can serve the environment as main stakeholder as long as it is able to capture those values perceived by the environment by finding willingness at the consumer to pay for those environmental qualities. <img style="border:1px solid #C3E6D8;float:right;" alt="" src="https://cdn.slidesharecdn.com/ss_thumbnails/patagonia113013-131130123714-phpapp01-thumbnail.jpg?width=120&height=120&fit=bounds" /><br> As producer of outdoor cloth Patagonia considers the environment as their most important stakeholder in their decision-making. Their environmental efforts go far beyond required law and impose extra costs on their customers. As to basic economic logic providing environmental quality beyond required law will put a company in a competitive disadvantage. Patagonia’s vision is environmental conservation and restoration. They consider their purpose of being in building the best product, cause no unnecessary harm, and use business to inspire and implement solutions to the environmental crisis. Patagonia wants to compete in the market by pursuing an environmental differentiation strategy. Patagonia’s key tactics in providing value for their stakeholders are summarized under the so-called ‘Product Lifecycle Initiative’. This initiative is a holistic commitment to lengthen the product lifecycle and reduce landfill waste. Those tactics can be categorized into what Patagonia refers to as: Reduce, repair, reuse and recycle. To reduce their customers consumption Patagonia heavily invests into R&D to produce the most durable garments. In addition, they only use organic and recycled garments to reduce the footprint of their products. Patagonia offers a free repair service for all of their products for the whole product life. Furthermore, they offer a second market where consumers can resell their used products. Patagonia encourages their customers to return Patagonia products instead of throwing them away so that they can recycle them correctly. Patagonia provides a lot of value to the environment. This value needs to be captured via the consumers. Hence, the environmental quality they provide needs to find a willingness to pay among the customers. Some, but few people buy Patagonia products for altruistic reasons because they know that buying Patagonia products will do good to the environment. Patagonia bundles the public good of environmental quality, which is difficult to charge the customer for, with the private good being product quality. They do this by constantly communicating environment friendliness together with quality. Hence, consumer value environmental friendliness for the implicit quality Patagonia offers. Another aspect to buy their products is environmental prestige. Most importantly, however, environmentalism resonates with their customer values as Patagonia’s customers, as buyers of outdoor wear, usually love the nature. The fact that environmentalism is deeply integrated into their business model makes their engagement credible and difficult to imitate by competitors. As the case of Patagonia shows basic economic logic has its limits when it comes to environmental differentiation strategies. A company can serve the environment as main stakeholder as long as it is able to capture those values perceived by the environment by finding willingness at the consumer to pay for those environmental qualities.

Environmental Differentiation Strategy of Patagonia from Johannes Mahlich

]]> 16089 45 https://cdn.slidesharecdn.com/ss_thumbnails/patagonia113013-131130123714-phpapp01-thumbnail.jpg?width=120&height=120&fit=bounds presentation Black http://activitystrea.ms/schema/1.0/post

http://activitystrea.ms/schema/1.0/posted

0 https://cdn.slidesharecdn.com/profile-photo-johannesmahlich-48x48.jpg?cb=1523539254 http://de.slideshare.net/johannesmahlich