際際滷shows by User: jvitak / http://www.slideshare.net/images/logo.gif 際際滷shows by User: jvitak / Tue, 01 Mar 2016 18:23:32 GMT 際際滷Share feed for 際際滷shows by User: jvitak CSCW 2016: Beyond the Belmont Principles /slideshow/cscw-2016-beyond-the-belmont-principles/58925320 cscw2016ethics-web-160301182332
Pervasive information streams that document people and their routines have been a boon to social computing research. But the ethics of collecting and analyzing availablebut potentially sensitiveonline data present challenges to researchers. In response to increasing public and scholarly debate over the ethics of online data research, this paper analyzes the current state of practice among researchers using online data. Qualitative and quantitative responses from a survey of 263 online data researchers document beliefs and practices around which social computing researchers are converging, as well as areas of ongoing disagreement. The survey also reveals that these disagreements are not correlated with disciplinary, methodological, or workplace affiliations. The paper concludes by reflecting on changing ethical practices in the digital age, and discusses a set of emergent best practices for ethical social computing research.]]>
Pervasive information streams that document people and their routines have been a boon to social computing research. But the ethics of collecting and analyzing availablebut potentially sensitiveonline data present challenges to researchers. In response to increasing public and scholarly debate over the ethics of online data research, this paper analyzes the current state of practice among researchers using online data. Qualitative and quantitative responses from a survey of 263 online data researchers document beliefs and practices around which social computing researchers are converging, as well as areas of ongoing disagreement. The survey also reveals that these disagreements are not correlated with disciplinary, methodological, or workplace affiliations. The paper concludes by reflecting on changing ethical practices in the digital age, and discusses a set of emergent best practices for ethical social computing research.]]> Tue, 01 Mar 2016 18:23:32 GMT /slideshow/cscw-2016-beyond-the-belmont-principles/58925320 jvitak@slideshare.net(jvitak) CSCW 2016: Beyond the Belmont Principles jvitak Pervasive information streams that document people and their routines have been a boon to social computing research. But the ethics of collecting and analyzing availablebut potentially sensitiveonline data present challenges to researchers. In response to increasing public and scholarly debate over the ethics of online data research, this paper analyzes the current state of practice among researchers using online data. Qualitative and quantitative responses from a survey of 263 online data researchers document beliefs and practices around which social computing researchers are converging, as well as areas of ongoing disagreement. The survey also reveals that these disagreements are not correlated with disciplinary, methodological, or workplace affiliations. The paper concludes by reflecting on changing ethical practices in the digital age, and discusses a set of emergent best practices for ethical social computing research. <img style="border:1px solid #C3E6D8;float:right;" alt="" src="https://cdn.slidesharecdn.com/ss_thumbnails/cscw2016ethics-web-160301182332-thumbnail.jpg?width=120&amp;height=120&amp;fit=bounds" /><br> Pervasive information streams that document people and their routines have been a boon to social computing research. But the ethics of collecting and analyzing availablebut potentially sensitiveonline data present challenges to researchers. In response to increasing public and scholarly debate over the ethics of online data research, this paper analyzes the current state of practice among researchers using online data. Qualitative and quantitative responses from a survey of 263 online data researchers document beliefs and practices around which social computing researchers are converging, as well as areas of ongoing disagreement. The survey also reveals that these disagreements are not correlated with disciplinary, methodological, or workplace affiliations. The paper concludes by reflecting on changing ethical practices in the digital age, and discusses a set of emergent best practices for ethical social computing research.
CSCW 2016: Beyond the Belmont Principles from Jessica Vitak
]]> 1105 8 https://cdn.slidesharecdn.com/ss_thumbnails/cscw2016ethics-web-160301182332-thumbnail.jpg?width=120&height=120&fit=bounds presentation Black http://activitystrea.ms/schema/1.0/post http://activitystrea.ms/schema/1.0/posted 0 I like it....whatever that means: The evolving relationship between disclosure, audience, and privacy in networked spaces /slideshow/i-like-itwhatever-that-means-the-evolving-relationship-between-disclosure-audience-and-privacy-in-networked-spaces/45818331 snkjsik7qlwpqxvnmxl9-signature-9e4723e1bb40c74875febc2b68dc98d45ad5b8c2f2258d3f421b0783a8e36235-poli-150313194056-conversion-gate01
]]>
]]> Fri, 13 Mar 2015 19:40:56 GMT /slideshow/i-like-itwhatever-that-means-the-evolving-relationship-between-disclosure-audience-and-privacy-in-networked-spaces/45818331 jvitak@slideshare.net(jvitak) I like it....whatever that means: The evolving relationship between disclosure, audience, and privacy in networked spaces jvitak <img style="border:1px solid #C3E6D8;float:right;" alt="" src="https://cdn.slidesharecdn.com/ss_thumbnails/snkjsik7qlwpqxvnmxl9-signature-9e4723e1bb40c74875febc2b68dc98d45ad5b8c2f2258d3f421b0783a8e36235-poli-150313194056-conversion-gate01-thumbnail.jpg?width=120&amp;height=120&amp;fit=bounds" /><br>
I like it....whatever that means: The evolving relationship between disclosure, audience, and privacy in networked spaces from Jessica Vitak
]]> 844 2 https://cdn.slidesharecdn.com/ss_thumbnails/snkjsik7qlwpqxvnmxl9-signature-9e4723e1bb40c74875febc2b68dc98d45ad5b8c2f2258d3f421b0783a8e36235-poli-150313194056-conversion-gate01-thumbnail.jpg?width=120&height=120&fit=bounds presentation Black http://activitystrea.ms/schema/1.0/post http://activitystrea.ms/schema/1.0/posted 0 INFM600 Module 1 lecture /slideshow/infm600-module-1-lecture/38575766 infm600-fa14-module1-intro-web-140901162613-phpapp02
INFM600-FA14 Module 1 lecture]]>
INFM600-FA14 Module 1 lecture]]> Mon, 01 Sep 2014 16:26:13 GMT /slideshow/infm600-module-1-lecture/38575766 jvitak@slideshare.net(jvitak) INFM600 Module 1 lecture jvitak INFM600-FA14 Module 1 lecture <img style="border:1px solid #C3E6D8;float:right;" alt="" src="https://cdn.slidesharecdn.com/ss_thumbnails/infm600-fa14-module1-intro-web-140901162613-phpapp02-thumbnail.jpg?width=120&amp;height=120&amp;fit=bounds" /><br> INFM600-FA14 Module 1 lecture
INFM600 Module 1 lecture from Jessica Vitak
]]> 430 4 https://cdn.slidesharecdn.com/ss_thumbnails/infm600-fa14-module1-intro-web-140901162613-phpapp02-thumbnail.jpg?width=120&height=120&fit=bounds presentation Black http://activitystrea.ms/schema/1.0/post http://activitystrea.ms/schema/1.0/posted 0 Leveraging Your Audience Through Social Media /slideshow/leveraging-your-audience-through-social-media-35229584/35229584 wmstpresentation052814-140528142030-phpapp02
Presentation at the University of Maryland's Women's Studies Summer Technology Institute (#wmststi) on the powerful role of social media and other sites in creating an online brand and locating & disseminating information. ]]>
Presentation at the University of Maryland's Women's Studies Summer Technology Institute (#wmststi) on the powerful role of social media and other sites in creating an online brand and locating & disseminating information. ]]> Wed, 28 May 2014 14:20:30 GMT /slideshow/leveraging-your-audience-through-social-media-35229584/35229584 jvitak@slideshare.net(jvitak) Leveraging Your Audience Through Social Media jvitak Presentation at the University of Maryland's Women's Studies Summer Technology Institute (#wmststi) on the powerful role of social media and other sites in creating an online brand and locating & disseminating information. <img style="border:1px solid #C3E6D8;float:right;" alt="" src="https://cdn.slidesharecdn.com/ss_thumbnails/wmstpresentation052814-140528142030-phpapp02-thumbnail.jpg?width=120&amp;height=120&amp;fit=bounds" /><br> Presentation at the University of Maryland&#39;s Women&#39;s Studies Summer Technology Institute (#wmststi) on the powerful role of social media and other sites in creating an online brand and locating &amp; disseminating information.
Leveraging Your Audience Through Social Media from Jessica Vitak
]]> 787 2 https://cdn.slidesharecdn.com/ss_thumbnails/wmstpresentation052814-140528142030-phpapp02-thumbnail.jpg?width=120&height=120&fit=bounds presentation Black http://activitystrea.ms/schema/1.0/post http://activitystrea.ms/schema/1.0/posted 0 Leveraging Your Audience Through Social Media /slideshow/leveraging-your-audience-through-social-media/35226032 wmstpresentation052814-140528125021-phpapp01
Presentation at the University of Maryland's Women's Studies Summer Technology Institute (#wmststi) on the powerful role of social media and other sites in creating an online brand and locating & disseminating information. ]]>
Presentation at the University of Maryland's Women's Studies Summer Technology Institute (#wmststi) on the powerful role of social media and other sites in creating an online brand and locating & disseminating information. ]]> Wed, 28 May 2014 12:50:21 GMT /slideshow/leveraging-your-audience-through-social-media/35226032 jvitak@slideshare.net(jvitak) Leveraging Your Audience Through Social Media jvitak Presentation at the University of Maryland's Women's Studies Summer Technology Institute (#wmststi) on the powerful role of social media and other sites in creating an online brand and locating & disseminating information. <img style="border:1px solid #C3E6D8;float:right;" alt="" src="https://cdn.slidesharecdn.com/ss_thumbnails/wmstpresentation052814-140528125021-phpapp01-thumbnail.jpg?width=120&amp;height=120&amp;fit=bounds" /><br> Presentation at the University of Maryland&#39;s Women&#39;s Studies Summer Technology Institute (#wmststi) on the powerful role of social media and other sites in creating an online brand and locating &amp; disseminating information.
Leveraging Your Audience Through Social Media from Jessica Vitak
]]> 364 3 https://cdn.slidesharecdn.com/ss_thumbnails/wmstpresentation052814-140528125021-phpapp01-thumbnail.jpg?width=120&height=120&fit=bounds presentation Black http://activitystrea.ms/schema/1.0/post http://activitystrea.ms/schema/1.0/posted 0 Connecting in the Facebook Age: Development and Validation of a New Measure of Relationship Maintenance /jvitak/vitak-ica14-relationship-maintenance-web vitakica14relationshipmaintenance-web-140524154254-phpapp01
Presentation of ICA paper, "Connecting in the Facebook Age: Development and Validation of a New Measure of Relationship Maintenance." This presentation includes details from additional validity and reliability testing using confirmatory factor analysis. Link to paper: http://vitak.files.wordpress.com/2009/02/ica2014-relmaintenance-toshare.pdf ]]>
Presentation of ICA paper, "Connecting in the Facebook Age: Development and Validation of a New Measure of Relationship Maintenance." This presentation includes details from additional validity and reliability testing using confirmatory factor analysis. Link to paper: http://vitak.files.wordpress.com/2009/02/ica2014-relmaintenance-toshare.pdf ]]> Sat, 24 May 2014 15:42:54 GMT /jvitak/vitak-ica14-relationship-maintenance-web jvitak@slideshare.net(jvitak) Connecting in the Facebook Age: Development and Validation of a New Measure of Relationship Maintenance jvitak Presentation of ICA paper, "Connecting in the Facebook Age: Development and Validation of a New Measure of Relationship Maintenance." This presentation includes details from additional validity and reliability testing using confirmatory factor analysis. Link to paper: http://vitak.files.wordpress.com/2009/02/ica2014-relmaintenance-toshare.pdf <img style="border:1px solid #C3E6D8;float:right;" alt="" src="https://cdn.slidesharecdn.com/ss_thumbnails/vitakica14relationshipmaintenance-web-140524154254-phpapp01-thumbnail.jpg?width=120&amp;height=120&amp;fit=bounds" /><br> Presentation of ICA paper, &quot;Connecting in the Facebook Age: Development and Validation of a New Measure of Relationship Maintenance.&quot; This presentation includes details from additional validity and reliability testing using confirmatory factor analysis. Link to paper: http://vitak.files.wordpress.com/2009/02/ica2014-relmaintenance-toshare.pdf
Connecting in the Facebook Age: Development and Validation of a New Measure of Relationship Maintenance from Jessica Vitak
]]> 1512 10 https://cdn.slidesharecdn.com/ss_thumbnails/vitakica14relationshipmaintenance-web-140524154254-phpapp01-thumbnail.jpg?width=120&height=120&fit=bounds presentation White http://activitystrea.ms/schema/1.0/post http://activitystrea.ms/schema/1.0/posted 0 Understanding Users' Privacy Motivations and Behaviors in Online Spaces /jvitak/understanding-users-privacy-motivations-and-behaviors-in-online-spaces hcilprivacytalk-web-140327134226-phpapp01
Ive spent my career so far studying the social outcomes people derive from their use of new communication systems like Facebook. These sites contain numerous affordances that differentiate them from other forms of communication & create low-cost environments for things like relationship maintenance and exchange of resources. I have found this research to be extremely rewarding, as it is important to understand how these social systems extend our capabilities for human interaction, beyond the more traditional forms of communication we have relied on previously. But, there's a flip side to this story. Humans, by nature, are very social beings and want to interact, want to disclose information and share it with others. Social network sites and their like facilitate this through a variety of features. However, as individuals have moved their communication from offline spaces, where the interactions tend to be much more ephemeral and audiences are generally known, to online spaces, where the lines between public and private become much more blurred, I believe that thoughts of privacy of personal information are often lost in the novelty of the technologies. Now, as we begin to think about this issue more and more, I believe its time to step back and re-evaluate how we conceptualize our privacy in this highly networked world and to integrate that understanding into solutions that will help individuals become more savvy users of the technology. ]]>
Ive spent my career so far studying the social outcomes people derive from their use of new communication systems like Facebook. These sites contain numerous affordances that differentiate them from other forms of communication & create low-cost environments for things like relationship maintenance and exchange of resources. I have found this research to be extremely rewarding, as it is important to understand how these social systems extend our capabilities for human interaction, beyond the more traditional forms of communication we have relied on previously. But, there's a flip side to this story. Humans, by nature, are very social beings and want to interact, want to disclose information and share it with others. Social network sites and their like facilitate this through a variety of features. However, as individuals have moved their communication from offline spaces, where the interactions tend to be much more ephemeral and audiences are generally known, to online spaces, where the lines between public and private become much more blurred, I believe that thoughts of privacy of personal information are often lost in the novelty of the technologies. Now, as we begin to think about this issue more and more, I believe its time to step back and re-evaluate how we conceptualize our privacy in this highly networked world and to integrate that understanding into solutions that will help individuals become more savvy users of the technology. ]]> Thu, 27 Mar 2014 13:42:26 GMT /jvitak/understanding-users-privacy-motivations-and-behaviors-in-online-spaces jvitak@slideshare.net(jvitak) Understanding Users' Privacy Motivations and Behaviors in Online Spaces jvitak Ive spent my career so far studying the social outcomes people derive from their use of new communication systems like Facebook. These sites contain numerous affordances that differentiate them from other forms of communication & create low-cost environments for things like relationship maintenance and exchange of resources. I have found this research to be extremely rewarding, as it is important to understand how these social systems extend our capabilities for human interaction, beyond the more traditional forms of communication we have relied on previously. But, there's a flip side to this story. Humans, by nature, are very social beings and want to interact, want to disclose information and share it with others. Social network sites and their like facilitate this through a variety of features. However, as individuals have moved their communication from offline spaces, where the interactions tend to be much more ephemeral and audiences are generally known, to online spaces, where the lines between public and private become much more blurred, I believe that thoughts of privacy of personal information are often lost in the novelty of the technologies. Now, as we begin to think about this issue more and more, I believe its time to step back and re-evaluate how we conceptualize our privacy in this highly networked world and to integrate that understanding into solutions that will help individuals become more savvy users of the technology. <img style="border:1px solid #C3E6D8;float:right;" alt="" src="https://cdn.slidesharecdn.com/ss_thumbnails/hcilprivacytalk-web-140327134226-phpapp01-thumbnail.jpg?width=120&amp;height=120&amp;fit=bounds" /><br> Ive spent my career so far studying the social outcomes people derive from their use of new communication systems like Facebook. These sites contain numerous affordances that differentiate them from other forms of communication &amp; create low-cost environments for things like relationship maintenance and exchange of resources. I have found this research to be extremely rewarding, as it is important to understand how these social systems extend our capabilities for human interaction, beyond the more traditional forms of communication we have relied on previously. But, there&#39;s a flip side to this story. Humans, by nature, are very social beings and want to interact, want to disclose information and share it with others. Social network sites and their like facilitate this through a variety of features. However, as individuals have moved their communication from offline spaces, where the interactions tend to be much more ephemeral and audiences are generally known, to online spaces, where the lines between public and private become much more blurred, I believe that thoughts of privacy of personal information are often lost in the novelty of the technologies. Now, as we begin to think about this issue more and more, I believe its time to step back and re-evaluate how we conceptualize our privacy in this highly networked world and to integrate that understanding into solutions that will help individuals become more savvy users of the technology.
Understanding Users' Privacy Motivations and Behaviors in Online Spaces from Jessica Vitak
]]> 643 6 https://cdn.slidesharecdn.com/ss_thumbnails/hcilprivacytalk-web-140327134226-phpapp01-thumbnail.jpg?width=120&height=120&fit=bounds presentation Black http://activitystrea.ms/schema/1.0/post http://activitystrea.ms/schema/1.0/posted 0 #cscw2014 -- Facebook Makes the Heart Grow Fonder: Relationship Maintenance Strategies Among Geographically Dispersed and Communication-Restricted Connections /slideshow/cscw2014-distanceweb/31850377 cscw2014-distance-web-140303104756-phpapp01
Read the paper here: http://vitak.files.wordpress.com/2009/02/vitak-cscw2014-distance.pdf Abstract: The increasing ubiquity of information and communication technologies has dramatically impacted interpersonal communication and relationship maintenance processes. These technologies remove temporal and spatial constraints, enabling communication at a distance for low to no physical costs. Research has established that technologies such as email supplement other forms of communication in relationship maintenance, but to what extent do newer technologieswhich contain a unique set of affordancesfacilitate these processes? Furthermore, do SNS users engage in different practices through the site and obtain different relational benefits based on specific characteristics of the tie? Findings from a survey of adult Facebook users (N=415) indicate that geographically distant Facebook Friends, as well as those who rely on the site as their primary form of communication, engage in relationship maintenance strategies through the site to a greater extent and perceive the site to have a more positive impact on the quality of their relationships.]]>
Read the paper here: http://vitak.files.wordpress.com/2009/02/vitak-cscw2014-distance.pdf Abstract: The increasing ubiquity of information and communication technologies has dramatically impacted interpersonal communication and relationship maintenance processes. These technologies remove temporal and spatial constraints, enabling communication at a distance for low to no physical costs. Research has established that technologies such as email supplement other forms of communication in relationship maintenance, but to what extent do newer technologieswhich contain a unique set of affordancesfacilitate these processes? Furthermore, do SNS users engage in different practices through the site and obtain different relational benefits based on specific characteristics of the tie? Findings from a survey of adult Facebook users (N=415) indicate that geographically distant Facebook Friends, as well as those who rely on the site as their primary form of communication, engage in relationship maintenance strategies through the site to a greater extent and perceive the site to have a more positive impact on the quality of their relationships.]]> Mon, 03 Mar 2014 10:47:56 GMT /slideshow/cscw2014-distanceweb/31850377 jvitak@slideshare.net(jvitak) #cscw2014 -- Facebook Makes the Heart Grow Fonder: Relationship Maintenance Strategies Among Geographically Dispersed and Communication-Restricted Connections jvitak Read the paper here: http://vitak.files.wordpress.com/2009/02/vitak-cscw2014-distance.pdf Abstract: The increasing ubiquity of information and communication technologies has dramatically impacted interpersonal communication and relationship maintenance processes. These technologies remove temporal and spatial constraints, enabling communication at a distance for low to no physical costs. Research has established that technologies such as email supplement other forms of communication in relationship maintenance, but to what extent do newer technologieswhich contain a unique set of affordancesfacilitate these processes? Furthermore, do SNS users engage in different practices through the site and obtain different relational benefits based on specific characteristics of the tie? Findings from a survey of adult Facebook users (N=415) indicate that geographically distant Facebook Friends, as well as those who rely on the site as their primary form of communication, engage in relationship maintenance strategies through the site to a greater extent and perceive the site to have a more positive impact on the quality of their relationships. <img style="border:1px solid #C3E6D8;float:right;" alt="" src="https://cdn.slidesharecdn.com/ss_thumbnails/cscw2014-distance-web-140303104756-phpapp01-thumbnail.jpg?width=120&amp;height=120&amp;fit=bounds" /><br> Read the paper here: http://vitak.files.wordpress.com/2009/02/vitak-cscw2014-distance.pdf Abstract: The increasing ubiquity of information and communication technologies has dramatically impacted interpersonal communication and relationship maintenance processes. These technologies remove temporal and spatial constraints, enabling communication at a distance for low to no physical costs. Research has established that technologies such as email supplement other forms of communication in relationship maintenance, but to what extent do newer technologieswhich contain a unique set of affordancesfacilitate these processes? Furthermore, do SNS users engage in different practices through the site and obtain different relational benefits based on specific characteristics of the tie? Findings from a survey of adult Facebook users (N=415) indicate that geographically distant Facebook Friends, as well as those who rely on the site as their primary form of communication, engage in relationship maintenance strategies through the site to a greater extent and perceive the site to have a more positive impact on the quality of their relationships.
#cscw2014 -- Facebook Makes the Heart Grow Fonder: Relationship Maintenance Strategies Among Geographically Dispersed and Communication-Restricted Connections from Jessica Vitak
]]> 2911 11 https://cdn.slidesharecdn.com/ss_thumbnails/cscw2014-distance-web-140303104756-phpapp01-thumbnail.jpg?width=120&height=120&fit=bounds presentation White http://activitystrea.ms/schema/1.0/post http://activitystrea.ms/schema/1.0/posted 0 Users and Nonusers: Interactions between Levels of Facebook Adoption and Social Capital /jvitak/non-users-presentationfinalweb nonuserspresentation-final-web-130227102930-phpapp01
Although Facebook is the largest social network site in the U.S. and attracts an increasingly diverse userbase, some individuals have chosen not to join the site. Using survey data collected from a sample of non-academic staff at a large Midwestern university (N=614), we explore the demographic and cognitive factors that predict whether a person chooses to join Facebook. We find that older adults and those with higher perceived levels of bonding social capital are less likely to use the site. Analyzing open-ended responses from non-users, we find that they express concerns about privacy, context collapse, limited time, and channel effects in deciding to not adopt Facebook. Finally, we compare non-adopters against users who differ on three dimensions of use. We find that light users often have social capital outcomes similar to, or worse than, non-users, and that heavy users report higher perceived bridging and bonding social capital than either group. To view the paper: http://vitak.files.wordpress.com/2009/02/lampe_vitak_ellison-2013-cscw.pdf]]>
Although Facebook is the largest social network site in the U.S. and attracts an increasingly diverse userbase, some individuals have chosen not to join the site. Using survey data collected from a sample of non-academic staff at a large Midwestern university (N=614), we explore the demographic and cognitive factors that predict whether a person chooses to join Facebook. We find that older adults and those with higher perceived levels of bonding social capital are less likely to use the site. Analyzing open-ended responses from non-users, we find that they express concerns about privacy, context collapse, limited time, and channel effects in deciding to not adopt Facebook. Finally, we compare non-adopters against users who differ on three dimensions of use. We find that light users often have social capital outcomes similar to, or worse than, non-users, and that heavy users report higher perceived bridging and bonding social capital than either group. To view the paper: http://vitak.files.wordpress.com/2009/02/lampe_vitak_ellison-2013-cscw.pdf]]> Wed, 27 Feb 2013 10:29:30 GMT /jvitak/non-users-presentationfinalweb jvitak@slideshare.net(jvitak) Users and Nonusers: Interactions between Levels of Facebook Adoption and Social Capital jvitak Although Facebook is the largest social network site in the U.S. and attracts an increasingly diverse userbase, some individuals have chosen not to join the site. Using survey data collected from a sample of non-academic staff at a large Midwestern university (N=614), we explore the demographic and cognitive factors that predict whether a person chooses to join Facebook. We find that older adults and those with higher perceived levels of bonding social capital are less likely to use the site. Analyzing open-ended responses from non-users, we find that they express concerns about privacy, context collapse, limited time, and channel effects in deciding to not adopt Facebook. Finally, we compare non-adopters against users who differ on three dimensions of use. We find that light users often have social capital outcomes similar to, or worse than, non-users, and that heavy users report higher perceived bridging and bonding social capital than either group. To view the paper: http://vitak.files.wordpress.com/2009/02/lampe_vitak_ellison-2013-cscw.pdf <img style="border:1px solid #C3E6D8;float:right;" alt="" src="https://cdn.slidesharecdn.com/ss_thumbnails/nonuserspresentation-final-web-130227102930-phpapp01-thumbnail.jpg?width=120&amp;height=120&amp;fit=bounds" /><br> Although Facebook is the largest social network site in the U.S. and attracts an increasingly diverse userbase, some individuals have chosen not to join the site. Using survey data collected from a sample of non-academic staff at a large Midwestern university (N=614), we explore the demographic and cognitive factors that predict whether a person chooses to join Facebook. We find that older adults and those with higher perceived levels of bonding social capital are less likely to use the site. Analyzing open-ended responses from non-users, we find that they express concerns about privacy, context collapse, limited time, and channel effects in deciding to not adopt Facebook. Finally, we compare non-adopters against users who differ on three dimensions of use. We find that light users often have social capital outcomes similar to, or worse than, non-users, and that heavy users report higher perceived bridging and bonding social capital than either group. To view the paper: http://vitak.files.wordpress.com/2009/02/lampe_vitak_ellison-2013-cscw.pdf
Users and Nonusers: Interactions between Levels of Facebook Adoption and Social Capital from Jessica Vitak
]]> 1054 4 https://cdn.slidesharecdn.com/ss_thumbnails/nonuserspresentation-final-web-130227102930-phpapp01-thumbnail.jpg?width=120&height=120&fit=bounds presentation White http://activitystrea.ms/schema/1.0/post http://activitystrea.ms/schema/1.0/posted 0 Social Media: Where We Stand, Where Were Heading /slideshow/socialmedia-futureprez101912/14806316 socialmedia-future-prez-101912-121019155933-phpapp02
Guest lecture at Elon University on 10/19/12 in COM 371, The Future of the Internet, talking about social media research and thoughts on where social media is heading in the coming years. ]]>
Guest lecture at Elon University on 10/19/12 in COM 371, The Future of the Internet, talking about social media research and thoughts on where social media is heading in the coming years. ]]> Fri, 19 Oct 2012 15:59:32 GMT /slideshow/socialmedia-futureprez101912/14806316 jvitak@slideshare.net(jvitak) Social Media: Where We Stand, Where Were Heading jvitak Guest lecture at Elon University on 10/19/12 in COM 371, The Future of the Internet, talking about social media research and thoughts on where social media is heading in the coming years. <img style="border:1px solid #C3E6D8;float:right;" alt="" src="https://cdn.slidesharecdn.com/ss_thumbnails/socialmedia-future-prez-101912-121019155933-phpapp02-thumbnail.jpg?width=120&amp;height=120&amp;fit=bounds" /><br> Guest lecture at Elon University on 10/19/12 in COM 371, The Future of the Internet, talking about social media research and thoughts on where social media is heading in the coming years.
Social Media: Where We Stand, Where Were Heading from Jessica Vitak
]]> 946 4 https://cdn.slidesharecdn.com/ss_thumbnails/socialmedia-future-prez-101912-121019155933-phpapp02-thumbnail.jpg?width=120&height=120&fit=bounds presentation Black http://activitystrea.ms/schema/1.0/post http://activitystrea.ms/schema/1.0/posted 0 Social Network Sites: An Overview /slideshow/social-network-sites-an-overview/12581322 guestlecture-is303-umbc-nonotes-120417203756-phpapp02
A short lecture I gave to an undergraduate HCI class to highlight research & findings on social network sites (SNSs).]]>
A short lecture I gave to an undergraduate HCI class to highlight research & findings on social network sites (SNSs).]]> Tue, 17 Apr 2012 20:37:55 GMT /slideshow/social-network-sites-an-overview/12581322 jvitak@slideshare.net(jvitak) Social Network Sites: An Overview jvitak A short lecture I gave to an undergraduate HCI class to highlight research & findings on social network sites (SNSs). <img style="border:1px solid #C3E6D8;float:right;" alt="" src="https://cdn.slidesharecdn.com/ss_thumbnails/guestlecture-is303-umbc-nonotes-120417203756-phpapp02-thumbnail.jpg?width=120&amp;height=120&amp;fit=bounds" /><br> A short lecture I gave to an undergraduate HCI class to highlight research &amp; findings on social network sites (SNSs).
Social Network Sites: An Overview from Jessica Vitak
]]> 3451 12 https://cdn.slidesharecdn.com/ss_thumbnails/guestlecture-is303-umbc-nonotes-120417203756-phpapp02-thumbnail.jpg?width=120&height=120&fit=bounds presentation Black http://activitystrea.ms/schema/1.0/post http://activitystrea.ms/schema/1.0/posted 0 Managing Privacy and Context Collapse in the Facebook Age /slideshow/managing-personal-information-in-the-facebook-age/12491360 ttw2012-120410144426-phpapp01
The growth of social mediaonline sites driven by the public sharing on personal information with a wide audienceraises new questions related to how individuals manage their privacy and self-presentation. The technical features of sites such as Facebook, Google Plus, and Twitter lower the transaction costs of connecting and interacting with a large and diverse audience. At the same time, they may raise the costs of managing self-presentation across different contexts and ensuring that private information is not shared with unintended audiences. Discussions related to self-presentation and privacy have featured prominently in the social sciences for more than half a century. For example, Goffman (1959) argued that individuals self-presentation varies based on the audience for whom they are performing. Likewise, Altman (1975) viewed privacy not as a static process, but one of dynamic boundary regulation, in which individuals make decisions regarding which pieces of personal information to share with whom, as well as the context in which that information is disclosed. In online social networking communities, additional social and technical features make the process of managing privacy and self-presentation more complicated. Unlike anonymous forums, where users can create virtual identities not connected to their real selves, SNSs are tied to real identities, and because users often share a significant amount of personal information through these sites (Nosko et al., 2010), privacy becomes a critical element to determining both who to connect with and what to disclose. Boyd (2008) characterizes SNSs as networked publics, and describes three features that differentiate them from other publics: invisible audiences, context collapse, and the blurring of public and private. Each of these factors is critical in evaluating how individuals can regulate boundaries and get the most out of their use of these sites. Context collapsethe flattening of multiple distinct audiences into a homogeneous groupoffers benefits and barriers to individuals. The average American adult has 229 Facebook friends (Hampton et al., 2011) who comprise a variety of personal and professional contexts. While Facebook enables users to quickly diffuse information across their entire network, communicating with such a diverse set of others through the same channel (e.g., status updates) may become problematic when it prevents individuals from varying their self-presentation for different audiences or when their full audience is unclear. When facing these challenges, individuals have a number of options. Bernie Hogan (2010) suggests that users employ a lowest common denominator approach, whereby only content appropriate for all audiences is shared on the site. On the other hand, users may employ advanced privacy settings to segregate audiences, so they can still share relevant content with their various connections. ]]>
The growth of social mediaonline sites driven by the public sharing on personal information with a wide audienceraises new questions related to how individuals manage their privacy and self-presentation. The technical features of sites such as Facebook, Google Plus, and Twitter lower the transaction costs of connecting and interacting with a large and diverse audience. At the same time, they may raise the costs of managing self-presentation across different contexts and ensuring that private information is not shared with unintended audiences. Discussions related to self-presentation and privacy have featured prominently in the social sciences for more than half a century. For example, Goffman (1959) argued that individuals self-presentation varies based on the audience for whom they are performing. Likewise, Altman (1975) viewed privacy not as a static process, but one of dynamic boundary regulation, in which individuals make decisions regarding which pieces of personal information to share with whom, as well as the context in which that information is disclosed. In online social networking communities, additional social and technical features make the process of managing privacy and self-presentation more complicated. Unlike anonymous forums, where users can create virtual identities not connected to their real selves, SNSs are tied to real identities, and because users often share a significant amount of personal information through these sites (Nosko et al., 2010), privacy becomes a critical element to determining both who to connect with and what to disclose. Boyd (2008) characterizes SNSs as networked publics, and describes three features that differentiate them from other publics: invisible audiences, context collapse, and the blurring of public and private. Each of these factors is critical in evaluating how individuals can regulate boundaries and get the most out of their use of these sites. Context collapsethe flattening of multiple distinct audiences into a homogeneous groupoffers benefits and barriers to individuals. The average American adult has 229 Facebook friends (Hampton et al., 2011) who comprise a variety of personal and professional contexts. While Facebook enables users to quickly diffuse information across their entire network, communicating with such a diverse set of others through the same channel (e.g., status updates) may become problematic when it prevents individuals from varying their self-presentation for different audiences or when their full audience is unclear. When facing these challenges, individuals have a number of options. Bernie Hogan (2010) suggests that users employ a lowest common denominator approach, whereby only content appropriate for all audiences is shared on the site. On the other hand, users may employ advanced privacy settings to segregate audiences, so they can still share relevant content with their various connections. ]]> Tue, 10 Apr 2012 14:44:24 GMT /slideshow/managing-personal-information-in-the-facebook-age/12491360 jvitak@slideshare.net(jvitak) Managing Privacy and Context Collapse in the Facebook Age jvitak The growth of social mediaonline sites driven by the public sharing on personal information with a wide audienceraises new questions related to how individuals manage their privacy and self-presentation. The technical features of sites such as Facebook, Google Plus, and Twitter lower the transaction costs of connecting and interacting with a large and diverse audience. At the same time, they may raise the costs of managing self-presentation across different contexts and ensuring that private information is not shared with unintended audiences. Discussions related to self-presentation and privacy have featured prominently in the social sciences for more than half a century. For example, Goffman (1959) argued that individuals self-presentation varies based on the audience for whom they are performing. Likewise, Altman (1975) viewed privacy not as a static process, but one of dynamic boundary regulation, in which individuals make decisions regarding which pieces of personal information to share with whom, as well as the context in which that information is disclosed. In online social networking communities, additional social and technical features make the process of managing privacy and self-presentation more complicated. Unlike anonymous forums, where users can create virtual identities not connected to their real selves, SNSs are tied to real identities, and because users often share a significant amount of personal information through these sites (Nosko et al., 2010), privacy becomes a critical element to determining both who to connect with and what to disclose. Boyd (2008) characterizes SNSs as networked publics, and describes three features that differentiate them from other publics: invisible audiences, context collapse, and the blurring of public and private. Each of these factors is critical in evaluating how individuals can regulate boundaries and get the most out of their use of these sites. Context collapsethe flattening of multiple distinct audiences into a homogeneous groupoffers benefits and barriers to individuals. The average American adult has 229 Facebook friends (Hampton et al., 2011) who comprise a variety of personal and professional contexts. While Facebook enables users to quickly diffuse information across their entire network, communicating with such a diverse set of others through the same channel (e.g., status updates) may become problematic when it prevents individuals from varying their self-presentation for different audiences or when their full audience is unclear. When facing these challenges, individuals have a number of options. Bernie Hogan (2010) suggests that users employ a lowest common denominator approach, whereby only content appropriate for all audiences is shared on the site. On the other hand, users may employ advanced privacy settings to segregate audiences, so they can still share relevant content with their various connections. <img style="border:1px solid #C3E6D8;float:right;" alt="" src="https://cdn.slidesharecdn.com/ss_thumbnails/ttw2012-120410144426-phpapp01-thumbnail.jpg?width=120&amp;height=120&amp;fit=bounds" /><br> The growth of social mediaonline sites driven by the public sharing on personal information with a wide audienceraises new questions related to how individuals manage their privacy and self-presentation. The technical features of sites such as Facebook, Google Plus, and Twitter lower the transaction costs of connecting and interacting with a large and diverse audience. At the same time, they may raise the costs of managing self-presentation across different contexts and ensuring that private information is not shared with unintended audiences. Discussions related to self-presentation and privacy have featured prominently in the social sciences for more than half a century. For example, Goffman (1959) argued that individuals self-presentation varies based on the audience for whom they are performing. Likewise, Altman (1975) viewed privacy not as a static process, but one of dynamic boundary regulation, in which individuals make decisions regarding which pieces of personal information to share with whom, as well as the context in which that information is disclosed. In online social networking communities, additional social and technical features make the process of managing privacy and self-presentation more complicated. Unlike anonymous forums, where users can create virtual identities not connected to their real selves, SNSs are tied to real identities, and because users often share a significant amount of personal information through these sites (Nosko et al., 2010), privacy becomes a critical element to determining both who to connect with and what to disclose. Boyd (2008) characterizes SNSs as networked publics, and describes three features that differentiate them from other publics: invisible audiences, context collapse, and the blurring of public and private. Each of these factors is critical in evaluating how individuals can regulate boundaries and get the most out of their use of these sites. Context collapsethe flattening of multiple distinct audiences into a homogeneous groupoffers benefits and barriers to individuals. The average American adult has 229 Facebook friends (Hampton et al., 2011) who comprise a variety of personal and professional contexts. While Facebook enables users to quickly diffuse information across their entire network, communicating with such a diverse set of others through the same channel (e.g., status updates) may become problematic when it prevents individuals from varying their self-presentation for different audiences or when their full audience is unclear. When facing these challenges, individuals have a number of options. Bernie Hogan (2010) suggests that users employ a lowest common denominator approach, whereby only content appropriate for all audiences is shared on the site. On the other hand, users may employ advanced privacy settings to segregate audiences, so they can still share relevant content with their various connections.
Managing Privacy and Context Collapse in the Facebook Age from Jessica Vitak
]]> 2484 9 https://cdn.slidesharecdn.com/ss_thumbnails/ttw2012-120410144426-phpapp01-thumbnail.jpg?width=120&height=120&fit=bounds presentation White http://activitystrea.ms/schema/1.0/post http://activitystrea.ms/schema/1.0/posted 0 Theorizing the Future of Computer-Mediated Communication: The Changing Role of Self-Presentation, Audience, and Interaction /slideshow/theorizing-the-future-of-computermediated-communication-the-changing-role-of-selfpresentation-audience-and-interaction/9731784 ttw2011presentation-slideshare-111017084641-phpapp01
Presentation at Theorizing the Web conference in College Park, MD on April 9, 2011. ]]>
Presentation at Theorizing the Web conference in College Park, MD on April 9, 2011. ]]> Mon, 17 Oct 2011 08:46:39 GMT /slideshow/theorizing-the-future-of-computermediated-communication-the-changing-role-of-selfpresentation-audience-and-interaction/9731784 jvitak@slideshare.net(jvitak) Theorizing the Future of Computer-Mediated Communication: The Changing Role of Self-Presentation, Audience, and Interaction jvitak Presentation at Theorizing the Web conference in College Park, MD on April 9, 2011. <img style="border:1px solid #C3E6D8;float:right;" alt="" src="https://cdn.slidesharecdn.com/ss_thumbnails/ttw2011presentation-slideshare-111017084641-phpapp01-thumbnail.jpg?width=120&amp;height=120&amp;fit=bounds" /><br> Presentation at Theorizing the Web conference in College Park, MD on April 9, 2011.
Theorizing the Future of Computer-Mediated Communication: The Changing Role of Self-Presentation, Audience, and Interaction from Jessica Vitak
]]> 3501 4 https://cdn.slidesharecdn.com/ss_thumbnails/ttw2011presentation-slideshare-111017084641-phpapp01-thumbnail.jpg?width=120&height=120&fit=bounds presentation White http://activitystrea.ms/schema/1.0/post http://activitystrea.ms/schema/1.0/posted 0 Technology and Social Media: How to Get the Word Out /slideshow/technology-and-social-media-how-to-get-the-word-out/9730783 mhsasocialmediapresentation-final-111017072829-phpapp01
A presentation to the ]]>
A presentation to the ]]> Mon, 17 Oct 2011 07:28:27 GMT /slideshow/technology-and-social-media-how-to-get-the-word-out/9730783 jvitak@slideshare.net(jvitak) Technology and Social Media: How to Get the Word Out jvitak A presentation to the <img style="border:1px solid #C3E6D8;float:right;" alt="" src="https://cdn.slidesharecdn.com/ss_thumbnails/mhsasocialmediapresentation-final-111017072829-phpapp01-thumbnail.jpg?width=120&amp;height=120&amp;fit=bounds" /><br> A presentation to the
Technology and Social Media: How to Get the Word Out from Jessica Vitak
]]> 689 2 https://cdn.slidesharecdn.com/ss_thumbnails/mhsasocialmediapresentation-final-111017072829-phpapp01-thumbnail.jpg?width=120&height=120&fit=bounds presentation Black http://activitystrea.ms/schema/1.0/post http://activitystrea.ms/schema/1.0/posted 0 Social Support and Information-Sharing on Facebook by Adult Users /slideshow/nca-adult-fbpresentationslideshare/5801762 nca-adultfb-presentation-slideshare-101116134436-phpapp01
These slides are from a presentation at the National Communication Association annual conference on November 16, 2010 in San Francisco. The presentation summarizes findings from a qualitative study of adult Facebook users and focuses on two key constructs of social capital: social support and information-seeking.]]>
These slides are from a presentation at the National Communication Association annual conference on November 16, 2010 in San Francisco. The presentation summarizes findings from a qualitative study of adult Facebook users and focuses on two key constructs of social capital: social support and information-seeking.]]> Tue, 16 Nov 2010 13:44:30 GMT /slideshow/nca-adult-fbpresentationslideshare/5801762 jvitak@slideshare.net(jvitak) Social Support and Information-Sharing on Facebook by Adult Users jvitak These slides are from a presentation at the National Communication Association annual conference on November 16, 2010 in San Francisco. The presentation summarizes findings from a qualitative study of adult Facebook users and focuses on two key constructs of social capital: social support and information-seeking. <img style="border:1px solid #C3E6D8;float:right;" alt="" src="https://cdn.slidesharecdn.com/ss_thumbnails/nca-adultfb-presentation-slideshare-101116134436-phpapp01-thumbnail.jpg?width=120&amp;height=120&amp;fit=bounds" /><br> These slides are from a presentation at the National Communication Association annual conference on November 16, 2010 in San Francisco. The presentation summarizes findings from a qualitative study of adult Facebook users and focuses on two key constructs of social capital: social support and information-seeking.
Social Support and Information-Sharing on Facebook by Adult Users from Jessica Vitak
]]> 733 4 https://cdn.slidesharecdn.com/ss_thumbnails/nca-adultfb-presentation-slideshare-101116134436-phpapp01-thumbnail.jpg?width=120&height=120&fit=bounds presentation Black http://activitystrea.ms/schema/1.0/post http://activitystrea.ms/schema/1.0/posted 0 https://cdn.slidesharecdn.com/profile-photo-jvitak-48x48.jpg?cb=1619708905 jessicavitak.com https://cdn.slidesharecdn.com/ss_thumbnails/cscw2016ethics-web-160301182332-thumbnail.jpg?width=320&height=320&fit=bounds slideshow/cscw-2016-beyond-the-belmont-principles/58925320 CSCW 2016: Beyond the ... https://cdn.slidesharecdn.com/ss_thumbnails/snkjsik7qlwpqxvnmxl9-signature-9e4723e1bb40c74875febc2b68dc98d45ad5b8c2f2258d3f421b0783a8e36235-poli-150313194056-conversion-gate01-thumbnail.jpg?width=320&height=320&fit=bounds slideshow/i-like-itwhatever-that-means-the-evolving-relationship-between-disclosure-audience-and-privacy-in-networked-spaces/45818331 I like it....whatever ... https://cdn.slidesharecdn.com/ss_thumbnails/infm600-fa14-module1-intro-web-140901162613-phpapp02-thumbnail.jpg?width=320&height=320&fit=bounds slideshow/infm600-module-1-lecture/38575766 INFM600 Module 1 lecture