�ݺ�ߣshows by User: legalholdpro

�ݺ�ߣshows by User: legalholdpro / http://www.slideshare.net/images/logo.gif �ݺ�ߣshows by User: legalholdpro / Thu, 05 Jun 2014 10:51:38 GMT �ݺ�ߣShare feed for �ݺ�ߣshows by User: legalholdpro Whitepaper: The Enlightened Legal Hold 2014 /slideshow/whitepaper-the-enlightened-legal-hold-2014/35530818 enlightened-ebook-140605105138-phpapp01
Three years after the Pension Committee opinion, Judge Shira Scheindlin's message is still loud and clear: The courts do not want to waste time and squander resources on motion practice, depositions and reams of submissions growing out of inexcusable failures to properly preserve relevant ESI. Now is the time for enlightened legal holds, an age when counsel have the judgment to distinguish what must be preserved, the knowledge to negotiate and lucidly communicate the scope, and the skills and tools to select and instruct on reasonable and effective methods of preservation. Download the white paper to discover: How to avoid the 5 Deadly Sins of Legal Holds Why a legal hold is an organic, bespoke process How to know if you are 'over-preserving' 9 key elements of a sound legal hold When to expect higher standards, raised stakes, and new vulnerabilities The Enlightened Legal Hold serves as a guide for organizations of any size in tackling the task of preservation that at times can seem overwhelming. The 2014 version includes updated citations and other improvements to guide you on your path to Preservation Nirvana.]]>
Three years after the Pension Committee opinion, Judge Shira Scheindlin's message is still loud and clear: The courts do not want to waste time and squander resources on motion practice, depositions and reams of submissions growing out of inexcusable failures to properly preserve relevant ESI. Now is the time for enlightened legal holds, an age when counsel have the judgment to distinguish what must be preserved, the knowledge to negotiate and lucidly communicate the scope, and the skills and tools to select and instruct on reasonable and effective methods of preservation. Download the white paper to discover: How to avoid the 5 Deadly Sins of Legal Holds Why a legal hold is an organic, bespoke process How to know if you are 'over-preserving' 9 key elements of a sound legal hold When to expect higher standards, raised stakes, and new vulnerabilities The Enlightened Legal Hold serves as a guide for organizations of any size in tackling the task of preservation that at times can seem overwhelming. The 2014 version includes updated citations and other improvements to guide you on your path to Preservation Nirvana.]]> Thu, 05 Jun 2014 10:51:38 GMT /slideshow/whitepaper-the-enlightened-legal-hold-2014/35530818 legalholdpro@slideshare.net(legalholdpro) Whitepaper: The Enlightened Legal Hold 2014 legalholdpro Three years after the Pension Committee opinion, Judge Shira Scheindlin's message is still loud and clear: The courts do not want to waste time and squander resources on motion practice, depositions and reams of submissions growing out of inexcusable failures to properly preserve relevant ESI. Now is the time for enlightened legal holds, an age when counsel have the judgment to distinguish what must be preserved, the knowledge to negotiate and lucidly communicate the scope, and the skills and tools to select and instruct on reasonable and effective methods of preservation. Download the white paper to discover: How to avoid the 5 Deadly Sins of Legal Holds Why a legal hold is an organic, bespoke process How to know if you are 'over-preserving' 9 key elements of a sound legal hold When to expect higher standards, raised stakes, and new vulnerabilities The Enlightened Legal Hold serves as a guide for organizations of any size in tackling the task of preservation that at times can seem overwhelming. The 2014 version includes updated citations and other improvements to guide you on your path to Preservation Nirvana. <img style="border:1px solid #C3E6D8;float:right;" alt="" src="https://cdn.slidesharecdn.com/ss_thumbnails/enlightened-ebook-140605105138-phpapp01-thumbnail.jpg?width=120&height=120&fit=bounds" /> Three years after the Pension Committee opinion, Judge Shira Scheindlin's message is still loud and clear: The courts do not want to waste time and squander resources on motion practice, depositions and reams of submissions growing out of inexcusable failures to properly preserve relevant ESI. Now is the time for enlightened legal holds, an age when counsel have the judgment to distinguish what must be preserved, the knowledge to negotiate and lucidly communicate the scope, and the skills and tools to select and instruct on reasonable and effective methods of preservation. Download the white paper to discover: How to avoid the 5 Deadly Sins of Legal Holds Why a legal hold is an organic, bespoke process How to know if you are 'over-preserving' 9 key elements of a sound legal hold When to expect higher standards, raised stakes, and new vulnerabilities The Enlightened Legal Hold serves as a guide for organizations of any size in tackling the task of preservation that at times can seem overwhelming. The 2014 version includes updated citations and other improvements to guide you on your path to Preservation Nirvana.

Whitepaper: The Enlightened Legal Hold 2014 from Zapproved

]]> 927 8 https://cdn.slidesharecdn.com/ss_thumbnails/enlightened-ebook-140605105138-phpapp01-thumbnail.jpg?width=120&height=120&fit=bounds document Black http://activitystrea.ms/schema/1.0/post

http://activitystrea.ms/schema/1.0/posted

1 Whitepaper: Legal Holds & Data Preservation 2014 /slideshow/whitepaper-legal-holds-data-preservation-2014/35530808 legal-holds-data-preservation-2014-140605105125-phpapp02
DOWNLOAD HERE: http://bit.ly/legal-holds-2014 Today's most critical challenges facing legal professionals regarding legal holds and data preservation were discussed by the nation's leading eDiscovery luminaries at the 2nd annual PREX Conference on Preservation Excellence. This new resource is a compilation of the session content, published so that anyone can benefit from the combined efforts of the outstanding lineup of speakers. Topics include: Zubulake 10 Years Later: The Current Legal Hold Landscape Creating, Executing and Defending Your Preservation Strategy Challenges of Social Media and BYOD Impact of the Upcoming Changes to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Judicial Panel: View from the Bench on Preservation This 33-page resource features commentary by industry experts, litigation and eDiscovery specialists from top law firms, in-house counsel from G2000 corporations, and 4 current and former federal judges. ]]>
DOWNLOAD HERE: http://bit.ly/legal-holds-2014 Today's most critical challenges facing legal professionals regarding legal holds and data preservation were discussed by the nation's leading eDiscovery luminaries at the 2nd annual PREX Conference on Preservation Excellence. This new resource is a compilation of the session content, published so that anyone can benefit from the combined efforts of the outstanding lineup of speakers. Topics include: Zubulake 10 Years Later: The Current Legal Hold Landscape Creating, Executing and Defending Your Preservation Strategy Challenges of Social Media and BYOD Impact of the Upcoming Changes to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Judicial Panel: View from the Bench on Preservation This 33-page resource features commentary by industry experts, litigation and eDiscovery specialists from top law firms, in-house counsel from G2000 corporations, and 4 current and former federal judges. ]]> Thu, 05 Jun 2014 10:51:25 GMT /slideshow/whitepaper-legal-holds-data-preservation-2014/35530808 legalholdpro@slideshare.net(legalholdpro) Whitepaper: Legal Holds & Data Preservation 2014 legalholdpro DOWNLOAD HERE: http://bit.ly/legal-holds-2014 Today's most critical challenges facing legal professionals regarding legal holds and data preservation were discussed by the nation's leading eDiscovery luminaries at the 2nd annual PREX Conference on Preservation Excellence. This new resource is a compilation of the session content, published so that anyone can benefit from the combined efforts of the outstanding lineup of speakers. Topics include: Zubulake 10 Years Later: The Current Legal Hold Landscape Creating, Executing and Defending Your Preservation Strategy Challenges of Social Media and BYOD Impact of the Upcoming Changes to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Judicial Panel: View from the Bench on Preservation This 33-page resource features commentary by industry experts, litigation and eDiscovery specialists from top law firms, in-house counsel from G2000 corporations, and 4 current and former federal judges. <img style="border:1px solid #C3E6D8;float:right;" alt="" src="https://cdn.slidesharecdn.com/ss_thumbnails/legal-holds-data-preservation-2014-140605105125-phpapp02-thumbnail.jpg?width=120&height=120&fit=bounds" /> DOWNLOAD HERE: http://bit.ly/legal-holds-2014 Today's most critical challenges facing legal professionals regarding legal holds and data preservation were discussed by the nation's leading eDiscovery luminaries at the 2nd annual PREX Conference on Preservation Excellence. This new resource is a compilation of the session content, published so that anyone can benefit from the combined efforts of the outstanding lineup of speakers. Topics include: Zubulake 10 Years Later: The Current Legal Hold Landscape Creating, Executing and Defending Your Preservation Strategy Challenges of Social Media and BYOD Impact of the Upcoming Changes to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Judicial Panel: View from the Bench on Preservation This 33-page resource features commentary by industry experts, litigation and eDiscovery specialists from top law firms, in-house counsel from G2000 corporations, and 4 current and former federal judges.

Whitepaper: Legal Holds & Data Preservation 2014 from Zapproved

]]> 973 7 https://cdn.slidesharecdn.com/ss_thumbnails/legal-holds-data-preservation-2014-140605105125-phpapp02-thumbnail.jpg?width=120&height=120&fit=bounds document White http://activitystrea.ms/schema/1.0/post

http://activitystrea.ms/schema/1.0/posted

1 Presentation: Federal Rules of Civil Procedure | Breaking Down the New Amendments /slideshow/alm-webinar-the-changing-rules-final-v-2-0/35530458 almwebinar-thechangingrules-finalv20-140605104230-phpapp02
]]>
]]> Thu, 05 Jun 2014 10:42:30 GMT /slideshow/alm-webinar-the-changing-rules-final-v-2-0/35530458 legalholdpro@slideshare.net(legalholdpro) Presentation: Federal Rules of Civil Procedure | Breaking Down the New Amendments legalholdpro <img style="border:1px solid #C3E6D8;float:right;" alt="" src="https://cdn.slidesharecdn.com/ss_thumbnails/almwebinar-thechangingrules-finalv20-140605104230-phpapp02-thumbnail.jpg?width=120&height=120&fit=bounds" />

Presentation: Federal Rules of Civil Procedure | Breaking Down the New Amendments from Zapproved

]]> 926 4 https://cdn.slidesharecdn.com/ss_thumbnails/almwebinar-thechangingrules-finalv20-140605104230-phpapp02-thumbnail.jpg?width=120&height=120&fit=bounds presentation Black http://activitystrea.ms/schema/1.0/post

http://activitystrea.ms/schema/1.0/posted

1 Spoliation Sanctions by Circuit Courts (printable chart) /slideshow/spoliation-sanctions-by-circuit-courts/19984823 spoliation-sanctions-by-circuit-legal-hold-pro-130425172722-phpapp01
Chart of Spoliation Sanctions by Circuit Court: Information included for each sanction: - Scope of Duty to Preserve - Can conduct be culpable per se without consideration of reasonableness? - Culpability and prejudice requirements.... - for sanctions in general - for dispositive sanctions - for adverse inference instruction - for a rebuttable presumption of relevance - What constitutes prejudice? - Culpability and corresponding jury instructions ]]>
Chart of Spoliation Sanctions by Circuit Court: Information included for each sanction: - Scope of Duty to Preserve - Can conduct be culpable per se without consideration of reasonableness? - Culpability and prejudice requirements.... - for sanctions in general - for dispositive sanctions - for adverse inference instruction - for a rebuttable presumption of relevance - What constitutes prejudice? - Culpability and corresponding jury instructions ]]> Thu, 25 Apr 2013 17:27:21 GMT /slideshow/spoliation-sanctions-by-circuit-courts/19984823 legalholdpro@slideshare.net(legalholdpro) Spoliation Sanctions by Circuit Courts (printable chart) legalholdpro Chart of Spoliation Sanctions by Circuit Court: Information included for each sanction: - Scope of Duty to Preserve - Can conduct be culpable per se without consideration of reasonableness? - Culpability and prejudice requirements.... - for sanctions in general - for dispositive sanctions - for adverse inference instruction - for a rebuttable presumption of relevance - What constitutes prejudice? - Culpability and corresponding jury instructions <img style="border:1px solid #C3E6D8;float:right;" alt="" src="https://cdn.slidesharecdn.com/ss_thumbnails/spoliation-sanctions-by-circuit-legal-hold-pro-130425172722-phpapp01-thumbnail.jpg?width=120&height=120&fit=bounds" /> Chart of Spoliation Sanctions by Circuit Court: Information included for each sanction: - Scope of Duty to Preserve - Can conduct be culpable per se without consideration of reasonableness? - Culpability and prejudice requirements.... - for sanctions in general - for dispositive sanctions - for adverse inference instruction - for a rebuttable presumption of relevance - What constitutes prejudice? - Culpability and corresponding jury instructions

Spoliation Sanctions by Circuit Courts (printable chart) from Zapproved

]]> 1355 6 https://cdn.slidesharecdn.com/ss_thumbnails/spoliation-sanctions-by-circuit-legal-hold-pro-130425172722-phpapp01-thumbnail.jpg?width=120&height=120&fit=bounds presentation White http://activitystrea.ms/schema/1.0/post

http://activitystrea.ms/schema/1.0/posted

1 Preservation and Proportionality: Lowering the Burden of Preserving Data in Civil Litigation /legalholdpro/preservation-and-proportionality-legalholdpro preservationandproportionality-legal-hold-pro-130425171731-phpapp01
The spotlight has turned to the issue of proportionality as it may be applied to the preservation of potentially relevant information. The postPension Committee world has moved beyond asking “if” litigants need to preserve information to a focus on “how.” One need look no further than the testimony before the Dallas mini-conference in September and followed shortly thereafter by the debate stirred by the Pippins v. KPMG opinion. Litigants are struggling to balance the increasing demands of preservation being driven by the exponential increase in electronically stored information (ESI) and the perceived rise in sanctions for spoliation. In order to control the increasing cost and “monumental inefficiency” that can result from traditional approaches to data preservation, the stakeholders in the U.S. legal system are searching for a solution founded on the principles of both reasonableness and proportionality as embodied in the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The goal of this paper is to explore options for providing more objective “guideposts” for litigants facing the uncertainty of future discovery demands.]]>
The spotlight has turned to the issue of proportionality as it may be applied to the preservation of potentially relevant information. The postPension Committee world has moved beyond asking “if” litigants need to preserve information to a focus on “how.” One need look no further than the testimony before the Dallas mini-conference in September and followed shortly thereafter by the debate stirred by the Pippins v. KPMG opinion. Litigants are struggling to balance the increasing demands of preservation being driven by the exponential increase in electronically stored information (ESI) and the perceived rise in sanctions for spoliation. In order to control the increasing cost and “monumental inefficiency” that can result from traditional approaches to data preservation, the stakeholders in the U.S. legal system are searching for a solution founded on the principles of both reasonableness and proportionality as embodied in the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The goal of this paper is to explore options for providing more objective “guideposts” for litigants facing the uncertainty of future discovery demands.]]> Thu, 25 Apr 2013 17:17:31 GMT /legalholdpro/preservation-and-proportionality-legalholdpro legalholdpro@slideshare.net(legalholdpro) Preservation and Proportionality: Lowering the Burden of Preserving Data in Civil Litigation legalholdpro The spotlight has turned to the issue of proportionality as it may be applied to the preservation of potentially relevant information. The postPension Committee world has moved beyond asking “if” litigants need to preserve information to a focus on “how.” One need look no further than the testimony before the Dallas mini-conference in September and followed shortly thereafter by the debate stirred by the Pippins v. KPMG opinion. Litigants are struggling to balance the increasing demands of preservation being driven by the exponential increase in electronically stored information (ESI) and the perceived rise in sanctions for spoliation. In order to control the increasing cost and “monumental inefficiency” that can result from traditional approaches to data preservation, the stakeholders in the U.S. legal system are searching for a solution founded on the principles of both reasonableness and proportionality as embodied in the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The goal of this paper is to explore options for providing more objective “guideposts” for litigants facing the uncertainty of future discovery demands. <img style="border:1px solid #C3E6D8;float:right;" alt="" src="https://cdn.slidesharecdn.com/ss_thumbnails/preservationandproportionality-legal-hold-pro-130425171731-phpapp01-thumbnail.jpg?width=120&height=120&fit=bounds" /> The spotlight has turned to the issue of proportionality as it may be applied to the preservation of potentially relevant information. The postPension Committee world has moved beyond asking “if” litigants need to preserve information to a focus on “how.” One need look no further than the testimony before the Dallas mini-conference in September and followed shortly thereafter by the debate stirred by the Pippins v. KPMG opinion. Litigants are struggling to balance the increasing demands of preservation being driven by the exponential increase in electronically stored information (ESI) and the perceived rise in sanctions for spoliation. In order to control the increasing cost and “monumental inefficiency” that can result from traditional approaches to data preservation, the stakeholders in the U.S. legal system are searching for a solution founded on the principles of both reasonableness and proportionality as embodied in the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The goal of this paper is to explore options for providing more objective “guideposts” for litigants facing the uncertainty of future discovery demands.

Preservation and Proportionality: Lowering the Burden of Preserving Data in Civil Litigation from Zapproved

]]> 1143 4 https://cdn.slidesharecdn.com/ss_thumbnails/preservationandproportionality-legal-hold-pro-130425171731-phpapp01-thumbnail.jpg?width=120&height=120&fit=bounds document White http://activitystrea.ms/schema/1.0/post

http://activitystrea.ms/schema/1.0/posted

1 Legal Hold and Data Preservation Best Practices /slideshow/wp-legal-holdbestpracticesdec12/19819273 wp-legalholdbestpractices-dec12-130423182105-phpapp02
The basis for Legal Hold and Data Preservation Best Practices was the exceptional work by the group of presenters at the 2012 Conference on Preservation Excellence, held in Portland, Oregon in late September. The conference focused solely on the area of data preservation best practices. The presenters wanted to address a recurring issue heard at e-discovery events that found only limited attention being given to data preservation; often followed by a speaker blurting out “We could spend an entire day on preservation.” Well, we didn’t spend an entire day — we spent two. The level of dialogue and depth of discussion on litigation holds and data preservation at the conference was unprecedented. Following the event, at which appeared many nationally recognized experts in electronic discovery and in-house practitioners from around the U.S., the consensus was that the event succeeded in demonstrating that preservation is a unique field of focus. This Guide on “best practices” continues the goal of helping lead legal professionals on the path to excellence in legal holds and data preservation. Many organizations are working to instill sound data preservation processes and creating awareness internally among various groups of the importance of meeting the needs of the courts. However, few would rate themselves as achieving a level of excellence. This Guide coalesces the discussions of some of the best minds in electronic discovery to discuss the Aristotelian Ideal of what litigation holds and data preservation can be, not necessarily what it is today. The real opportunity is to take the concepts and apply them in your workplace to achieve the following:  Be better and more confident at what you do.  Reduce your risk.  Lower your costs.  Strengthen your leverage when litigating.  Make your time more productive.  Make your co-workers’ time more productive.  Annoy the courts less. You are an integral part in advancing the practice of data preservation. The knowledge you gain by reading this Guide is a concrete step in advancing the level of expertise in our community. Together we can improve how organizations of all shapes, sizes and industries approach the task of responding to a preservation obligation while building a valuable knowledge base for all to do better.]]>
The basis for Legal Hold and Data Preservation Best Practices was the exceptional work by the group of presenters at the 2012 Conference on Preservation Excellence, held in Portland, Oregon in late September. The conference focused solely on the area of data preservation best practices. The presenters wanted to address a recurring issue heard at e-discovery events that found only limited attention being given to data preservation; often followed by a speaker blurting out “We could spend an entire day on preservation.” Well, we didn’t spend an entire day — we spent two. The level of dialogue and depth of discussion on litigation holds and data preservation at the conference was unprecedented. Following the event, at which appeared many nationally recognized experts in electronic discovery and in-house practitioners from around the U.S., the consensus was that the event succeeded in demonstrating that preservation is a unique field of focus. This Guide on “best practices” continues the goal of helping lead legal professionals on the path to excellence in legal holds and data preservation. Many organizations are working to instill sound data preservation processes and creating awareness internally among various groups of the importance of meeting the needs of the courts. However, few would rate themselves as achieving a level of excellence. This Guide coalesces the discussions of some of the best minds in electronic discovery to discuss the Aristotelian Ideal of what litigation holds and data preservation can be, not necessarily what it is today. The real opportunity is to take the concepts and apply them in your workplace to achieve the following:  Be better and more confident at what you do.  Reduce your risk.  Lower your costs.  Strengthen your leverage when litigating.  Make your time more productive.  Make your co-workers’ time more productive.  Annoy the courts less. You are an integral part in advancing the practice of data preservation. The knowledge you gain by reading this Guide is a concrete step in advancing the level of expertise in our community. Together we can improve how organizations of all shapes, sizes and industries approach the task of responding to a preservation obligation while building a valuable knowledge base for all to do better.]]> Tue, 23 Apr 2013 18:21:05 GMT /slideshow/wp-legal-holdbestpracticesdec12/19819273 legalholdpro@slideshare.net(legalholdpro) Legal Hold and Data Preservation Best Practices legalholdpro The basis for Legal Hold and Data Preservation Best Practices was the exceptional work by the group of presenters at the 2012 Conference on Preservation Excellence, held in Portland, Oregon in late September. The conference focused solely on the area of data preservation best practices. The presenters wanted to address a recurring issue heard at e-discovery events that found only limited attention being given to data preservation; often followed by a speaker blurting out “We could spend an entire day on preservation.” Well, we didn’t spend an entire day — we spent two. The level of dialogue and depth of discussion on litigation holds and data preservation at the conference was unprecedented. Following the event, at which appeared many nationally recognized experts in electronic discovery and in-house practitioners from around the U.S., the consensus was that the event succeeded in demonstrating that preservation is a unique field of focus. This Guide on “best practices” continues the goal of helping lead legal professionals on the path to excellence in legal holds and data preservation. Many organizations are working to instill sound data preservation processes and creating awareness internally among various groups of the importance of meeting the needs of the courts. However, few would rate themselves as achieving a level of excellence. This Guide coalesces the discussions of some of the best minds in electronic discovery to discuss the Aristotelian Ideal of what litigation holds and data preservation can be, not necessarily what it is today. The real opportunity is to take the concepts and apply them in your workplace to achieve the following:  Be better and more confident at what you do.  Reduce your risk.  Lower your costs.  Strengthen your leverage when litigating.  Make your time more productive.  Make your co-workers’ time more productive.  Annoy the courts less. You are an integral part in advancing the practice of data preservation. The knowledge you gain by reading this Guide is a concrete step in advancing the level of expertise in our community. Together we can improve how organizations of all shapes, sizes and industries approach the task of responding to a preservation obligation while building a valuable knowledge base for all to do better. <img style="border:1px solid #C3E6D8;float:right;" alt="" src="https://cdn.slidesharecdn.com/ss_thumbnails/wp-legalholdbestpractices-dec12-130423182105-phpapp02-thumbnail.jpg?width=120&height=120&fit=bounds" /> The basis for Legal Hold and Data Preservation Best Practices was the exceptional work by the group of presenters at the 2012 Conference on Preservation Excellence, held in Portland, Oregon in late September. The conference focused solely on the area of data preservation best practices. The presenters wanted to address a recurring issue heard at e-discovery events that found only limited attention being given to data preservation; often followed by a speaker blurting out “We could spend an entire day on preservation.” Well, we didn’t spend an entire day — we spent two. The level of dialogue and depth of discussion on litigation holds and data preservation at the conference was unprecedented. Following the event, at which appeared many nationally recognized experts in electronic discovery and in-house practitioners from around the U.S., the consensus was that the event succeeded in demonstrating that preservation is a unique field of focus. This Guide on “best practices” continues the goal of helping lead legal professionals on the path to excellence in legal holds and data preservation. Many organizations are working to instill sound data preservation processes and creating awareness internally among various groups of the importance of meeting the needs of the courts. However, few would rate themselves as achieving a level of excellence. This Guide coalesces the discussions of some of the best minds in electronic discovery to discuss the Aristotelian Ideal of what litigation holds and data preservation can be, not necessarily what it is today. The real opportunity is to take the concepts and apply them in your workplace to achieve the following:  Be better and more confident at what you do.  Reduce your risk.  Lower your costs.  Strengthen your leverage when litigating.  Make your time more productive.  Make your co-workers’ time more productive.  Annoy the courts less. You are an integral part in advancing the practice of data preservation. The knowledge you gain by reading this Guide is a concrete step in advancing the level of expertise in our community. Together we can improve how organizations of all shapes, sizes and industries approach the task of responding to a preservation obligation while building a valuable knowledge base for all to do better.

Legal Hold and Data Preservation Best Practices from Zapproved

]]> 3739 15 https://cdn.slidesharecdn.com/ss_thumbnails/wp-legalholdbestpractices-dec12-130423182105-phpapp02-thumbnail.jpg?width=120&height=120&fit=bounds document White http://activitystrea.ms/schema/1.0/post

http://activitystrea.ms/schema/1.0/posted

1 https://cdn.slidesharecdn.com/profile-photo-legalholdpro-48x48.jpg?cb=1599237433 https://www.zapproved.com https://cdn.slidesharecdn.com/ss_thumbnails/enlightened-ebook-140605105138-phpapp01-thumbnail.jpg?width=320&height=320&fit=bounds slideshow/whitepaper-the-enlightened-legal-hold-2014/35530818 Whitepaper: The Enligh... https://cdn.slidesharecdn.com/ss_thumbnails/legal-holds-data-preservation-2014-140605105125-phpapp02-thumbnail.jpg?width=320&height=320&fit=bounds slideshow/whitepaper-legal-holds-data-preservation-2014/35530808 Whitepaper: Legal Hold... https://cdn.slidesharecdn.com/ss_thumbnails/almwebinar-thechangingrules-finalv20-140605104230-phpapp02-thumbnail.jpg?width=320&height=320&fit=bounds slideshow/alm-webinar-the-changing-rules-final-v-2-0/35530458 Presentation: Federal ...