�ݺ�ߣshows by User: morrisonlee77

�ݺ�ߣshows by User: morrisonlee77 / http://www.slideshare.net/images/logo.gif �ݺ�ߣshows by User: morrisonlee77 / Fri, 03 Apr 2015 09:33:53 GMT �ݺ�ߣShare feed for �ݺ�ߣshows by User: morrisonlee77 Aarp biblical or only literal second coming. /slideshow/aarp-biblical-or-only-literal-second-coming/46614491 aarpbiblicaloronlyliteralsecondcoming-150403093353-conversion-gate01
This topic considers two frameworks of time to explain the second coming (parousia or presence ) of Jesus. Option (1) is biblical (not literal) meanings, as opposed to Option(2), only literal meanings of words. The slideshow briefly compares both and lists the shortcomings and advantages of each perspective. It concludes that biblical meanings from biblical usage permit an explanation in the first century without forcing facts out of their natural context.]]>
This topic considers two frameworks of time to explain the second coming (parousia or presence ) of Jesus. Option (1) is biblical (not literal) meanings, as opposed to Option(2), only literal meanings of words. The slideshow briefly compares both and lists the shortcomings and advantages of each perspective. It concludes that biblical meanings from biblical usage permit an explanation in the first century without forcing facts out of their natural context.]]> Fri, 03 Apr 2015 09:33:53 GMT /slideshow/aarp-biblical-or-only-literal-second-coming/46614491 morrisonlee77@slideshare.net(morrisonlee77) Aarp biblical or only literal second coming. morrisonlee77 This topic considers two frameworks of time to explain the second coming (parousia or presence ) of Jesus. Option (1) is biblical (not literal) meanings, as opposed to Option(2), only literal meanings of words. The slideshow briefly compares both and lists the shortcomings and advantages of each perspective. It concludes that biblical meanings from biblical usage permit an explanation in the first century without forcing facts out of their natural context. <img style="border:1px solid #C3E6D8;float:right;" alt="" src="https://cdn.slidesharecdn.com/ss_thumbnails/aarpbiblicaloronlyliteralsecondcoming-150403093353-conversion-gate01-thumbnail.jpg?width=120&height=120&fit=bounds" /><br> This topic considers two frameworks of time to explain the second coming (parousia or presence ) of Jesus. Option (1) is biblical (not literal) meanings, as opposed to Option(2), only literal meanings of words. The slideshow briefly compares both and lists the shortcomings and advantages of each perspective. It concludes that biblical meanings from biblical usage permit an explanation in the first century without forcing facts out of their natural context.

Aarp biblical or only literal second coming. from Morrison Lee

]]> 229 7 https://cdn.slidesharecdn.com/ss_thumbnails/aarpbiblicaloronlyliteralsecondcoming-150403093353-conversion-gate01-thumbnail.jpg?width=120&height=120&fit=bounds presentation Black http://activitystrea.ms/schema/1.0/post

http://activitystrea.ms/schema/1.0/posted

0 Movie aarp clouds semantics of prophetic language /morrisonlee77/movie-aarp-clouds-semantics-of-prophetic-language movieaarpclouds-semanticsofpropheticlanguage-150403092544-conversion-gate01
This Powerpoint looks at the semantics of prophetic language, especially the idea of CLOUDS in both testaments. (A very brief introduction to the use of clouds.) It will demonstrate the in the development of language CLOUDS became convertible in meaning to THE PRESENCE OF GOD IN BLESSING OR JUDGMENT. This has implications for Jesus' prophetic claims in Matthew 24 and 26.]]>
This Powerpoint looks at the semantics of prophetic language, especially the idea of CLOUDS in both testaments. (A very brief introduction to the use of clouds.) It will demonstrate the in the development of language CLOUDS became convertible in meaning to THE PRESENCE OF GOD IN BLESSING OR JUDGMENT. This has implications for Jesus' prophetic claims in Matthew 24 and 26.]]> Fri, 03 Apr 2015 09:25:44 GMT /morrisonlee77/movie-aarp-clouds-semantics-of-prophetic-language morrisonlee77@slideshare.net(morrisonlee77) Movie aarp clouds semantics of prophetic language morrisonlee77 This Powerpoint looks at the semantics of prophetic language, especially the idea of CLOUDS in both testaments. (A very brief introduction to the use of clouds.) It will demonstrate the in the development of language CLOUDS became convertible in meaning to THE PRESENCE OF GOD IN BLESSING OR JUDGMENT. This has implications for Jesus' prophetic claims in Matthew 24 and 26. <img style="border:1px solid #C3E6D8;float:right;" alt="" src="https://cdn.slidesharecdn.com/ss_thumbnails/movieaarpclouds-semanticsofpropheticlanguage-150403092544-conversion-gate01-thumbnail.jpg?width=120&height=120&fit=bounds" /><br> This Powerpoint looks at the semantics of prophetic language, especially the idea of CLOUDS in both testaments. (A very brief introduction to the use of clouds.) It will demonstrate the in the development of language CLOUDS became convertible in meaning to THE PRESENCE OF GOD IN BLESSING OR JUDGMENT. This has implications for Jesus' prophetic claims in Matthew 24 and 26.

Movie aarp clouds semantics of prophetic language from Morrison Lee

]]> 389 3 https://cdn.slidesharecdn.com/ss_thumbnails/movieaarpclouds-semanticsofpropheticlanguage-150403092544-conversion-gate01-thumbnail.jpg?width=120&height=120&fit=bounds presentation Black http://activitystrea.ms/schema/1.0/post

http://activitystrea.ms/schema/1.0/posted

0 THE CRAZEE FRUITS OF DOOMSDAY /morrisonlee77/resource-crazee-doomsday-fruit resource-crazeedoomsdayfruit-140313205903-phpapp02
The idea of Doomsday with its first century End Time ideas has never been adequately explained. Yet 'The End is Nigh' philosophy still hangs around in the twenty-first century with robust tenacity. After 2000 years of looking away from the first century Futurism is the preferred explanation. What did we miss? Whatever it is it must be subtle and very different from present explanations that turn their backs to the first century and toward our own. But hey, wait a minute! What did Jesus say again? "Truly I say unto you, this generation shall not pass away until all these things come to pass." Mtt 24:34. What if....??? What if He really meant what He said? What if He was talking to His contemporary generation and not us? What if WE are looking the wrong way when we skip the first century and face our third millennium future? What if He was right and WE are wrong? What if it is a matter of a modern mind misunderstanding an ancient book? What if we are just repeating an unfruitful formula of Futurism by ignoring Jesus? And what are the fruits of Futurism? What does a thousand-year historical review of Futurism demonstrate?]]>
The idea of Doomsday with its first century End Time ideas has never been adequately explained. Yet 'The End is Nigh' philosophy still hangs around in the twenty-first century with robust tenacity. After 2000 years of looking away from the first century Futurism is the preferred explanation. What did we miss? Whatever it is it must be subtle and very different from present explanations that turn their backs to the first century and toward our own. But hey, wait a minute! What did Jesus say again? "Truly I say unto you, this generation shall not pass away until all these things come to pass." Mtt 24:34. What if....??? What if He really meant what He said? What if He was talking to His contemporary generation and not us? What if WE are looking the wrong way when we skip the first century and face our third millennium future? What if He was right and WE are wrong? What if it is a matter of a modern mind misunderstanding an ancient book? What if we are just repeating an unfruitful formula of Futurism by ignoring Jesus? And what are the fruits of Futurism? What does a thousand-year historical review of Futurism demonstrate?]]> Thu, 13 Mar 2014 20:59:03 GMT /morrisonlee77/resource-crazee-doomsday-fruit morrisonlee77@slideshare.net(morrisonlee77) THE CRAZEE FRUITS OF DOOMSDAY morrisonlee77 The idea of Doomsday with its first century End Time ideas has never been adequately explained. Yet 'The End is Nigh' philosophy still hangs around in the twenty-first century with robust tenacity. After 2000 years of looking away from the first century Futurism is the preferred explanation. What did we miss? Whatever it is it must be subtle and very different from present explanations that turn their backs to the first century and toward our own. But hey, wait a minute! What did Jesus say again? "Truly I say unto you, this generation shall not pass away until all these things come to pass." Mtt 24:34. What if....??? What if He really meant what He said? What if He was talking to His contemporary generation and not us? What if WE are looking the wrong way when we skip the first century and face our third millennium future? What if He was right and WE are wrong? What if it is a matter of a modern mind misunderstanding an ancient book? What if we are just repeating an unfruitful formula of Futurism by ignoring Jesus? And what are the fruits of Futurism? What does a thousand-year historical review of Futurism demonstrate? <img style="border:1px solid #C3E6D8;float:right;" alt="" src="https://cdn.slidesharecdn.com/ss_thumbnails/resource-crazeedoomsdayfruit-140313205903-phpapp02-thumbnail.jpg?width=120&height=120&fit=bounds" /><br> The idea of Doomsday with its first century End Time ideas has never been adequately explained. Yet 'The End is Nigh' philosophy still hangs around in the twenty-first century with robust tenacity. After 2000 years of looking away from the first century Futurism is the preferred explanation. What did we miss? Whatever it is it must be subtle and very different from present explanations that turn their backs to the first century and toward our own. But hey, wait a minute! What did Jesus say again? "Truly I say unto you, this generation shall not pass away until all these things come to pass." Mtt 24:34. What if....??? What if He really meant what He said? What if He was talking to His contemporary generation and not us? What if WE are looking the wrong way when we skip the first century and face our third millennium future? What if He was right and WE are wrong? What if it is a matter of a modern mind misunderstanding an ancient book? What if we are just repeating an unfruitful formula of Futurism by ignoring Jesus? And what are the fruits of Futurism? What does a thousand-year historical review of Futurism demonstrate?

THE CRAZEE FRUITS OF DOOMSDAY from Morrison Lee

]]> 235 5 https://cdn.slidesharecdn.com/ss_thumbnails/resource-crazeedoomsdayfruit-140313205903-phpapp02-thumbnail.jpg?width=120&height=120&fit=bounds document White http://activitystrea.ms/schema/1.0/post

http://activitystrea.ms/schema/1.0/posted

0 https://cdn.slidesharecdn.com/profile-photo-morrisonlee77-48x48.jpg?cb=1523424837 I have six lifelong interests: . Christian Theology, . Science, Philosophy . Catastrophism, . Law . 18th dynasty Egypt . Psychology (Counseling) For exercise I run, play squash, and kick the occasional AFL footy. WEBSITE: http://thinkingman.weebly.com/ Iam honest, active, reflective, hard-working, and a pretty ordinary squash player on a bad day. https://cdn.slidesharecdn.com/ss_thumbnails/aarpbiblicaloronlyliteralsecondcoming-150403093353-conversion-gate01-thumbnail.jpg?width=320&height=320&fit=bounds slideshow/aarp-biblical-or-only-literal-second-coming/46614491 Aarp biblical or only ... https://cdn.slidesharecdn.com/ss_thumbnails/movieaarpclouds-semanticsofpropheticlanguage-150403092544-conversion-gate01-thumbnail.jpg?width=320&height=320&fit=bounds morrisonlee77/movie-aarp-clouds-semantics-of-prophetic-language Movie aarp clouds sema... https://cdn.slidesharecdn.com/ss_thumbnails/resource-crazeedoomsdayfruit-140313205903-phpapp02-thumbnail.jpg?width=320&height=320&fit=bounds morrisonlee77/resource-crazee-doomsday-fruit THE CRAZEE FRUITS OF D...