�ݺ�ߣshows by User: nipclaw

�ݺ�ߣshows by User: nipclaw / http://www.slideshare.net/images/logo.gif �ݺ�ߣshows by User: nipclaw / Thu, 26 Sep 2024 13:56:35 GMT �ݺ�ߣShare feed for �ݺ�ߣshows by User: nipclaw Safeguarding Your Investment in Convergent Content /slideshow/safeguarding-your-investment-in-convergent-content/272037755 convergentcontent-240926135635-0ea208ba
These are the slides of an online talk that I gave on Wednesday, 25 Sept 2024 to the participants of the Convergent Content Scaler programme. This is a 12-week accelerator-style programme which is operated by the Menai Science Park on Anglesey and Tramshed Tech in South Wales to transform recently formed knowledge-based businesses to transition from startup to scale-up status. In order to accomplish that transition those businesses will require angel and private equity investment. Those investors will require safeguards for their investments. The bundle of rights that protect investment in branding, design, technology and creativity are known as "intellectual property." My presentation introduced the audience to the different types of IP rights, namely: - patents - registered designs - trade marks - copyrights - rights in performances - action for passing off, and - breach of confidence. I advised the audience on the prosecution of patent, registered design and trade mark applications. I discussed the advantages of instructing patent and trade mark attorneys. I reminded the audience that enforcement was primarily the responsibility of the rights owner. Civil litigation is expensive and scale-ups are advised to consider IP insurance. After the formal presentation the attendees divided into break-out groups and I discussed some of the practical issues of some of the attendees.]]>
These are the slides of an online talk that I gave on Wednesday, 25 Sept 2024 to the participants of the Convergent Content Scaler programme. This is a 12-week accelerator-style programme which is operated by the Menai Science Park on Anglesey and Tramshed Tech in South Wales to transform recently formed knowledge-based businesses to transition from startup to scale-up status. In order to accomplish that transition those businesses will require angel and private equity investment. Those investors will require safeguards for their investments. The bundle of rights that protect investment in branding, design, technology and creativity are known as "intellectual property." My presentation introduced the audience to the different types of IP rights, namely: - patents - registered designs - trade marks - copyrights - rights in performances - action for passing off, and - breach of confidence. I advised the audience on the prosecution of patent, registered design and trade mark applications. I discussed the advantages of instructing patent and trade mark attorneys. I reminded the audience that enforcement was primarily the responsibility of the rights owner. Civil litigation is expensive and scale-ups are advised to consider IP insurance. After the formal presentation the attendees divided into break-out groups and I discussed some of the practical issues of some of the attendees.]]> Thu, 26 Sep 2024 13:56:35 GMT /slideshow/safeguarding-your-investment-in-convergent-content/272037755 nipclaw@slideshare.net(nipclaw) Safeguarding Your Investment in Convergent Content nipclaw These are the slides of an online talk that I gave on Wednesday, 25 Sept 2024 to the participants of the Convergent Content Scaler programme. This is a 12-week accelerator-style programme which is operated by the Menai Science Park on Anglesey and Tramshed Tech in South Wales to transform recently formed knowledge-based businesses to transition from startup to scale-up status. In order to accomplish that transition those businesses will require angel and private equity investment. Those investors will require safeguards for their investments. The bundle of rights that protect investment in branding, design, technology and creativity are known as "intellectual property." My presentation introduced the audience to the different types of IP rights, namely: - patents - registered designs - trade marks - copyrights - rights in performances - action for passing off, and - breach of confidence. I advised the audience on the prosecution of patent, registered design and trade mark applications. I discussed the advantages of instructing patent and trade mark attorneys. I reminded the audience that enforcement was primarily the responsibility of the rights owner. Civil litigation is expensive and scale-ups are advised to consider IP insurance. After the formal presentation the attendees divided into break-out groups and I discussed some of the practical issues of some of the attendees. <img style="border:1px solid #C3E6D8;float:right;" alt="" src="https://cdn.slidesharecdn.com/ss_thumbnails/convergentcontent-240926135635-0ea208ba-thumbnail.jpg?width=120&height=120&fit=bounds" /> These are the slides of an online talk that I gave on Wednesday, 25 Sept 2024 to the participants of the Convergent Content Scaler programme. This is a 12-week accelerator-style programme which is operated by the Menai Science Park on Anglesey and Tramshed Tech in South Wales to transform recently formed knowledge-based businesses to transition from startup to scale-up status. In order to accomplish that transition those businesses will require angel and private equity investment. Those investors will require safeguards for their investments. The bundle of rights that protect investment in branding, design, technology and creativity are known as "intellectual property." My presentation introduced the audience to the different types of IP rights, namely: - patents - registered designs - trade marks - copyrights - rights in performances - action for passing off, and - breach of confidence. I advised the audience on the prosecution of patent, registered design and trade mark applications. I discussed the advantages of instructing patent and trade mark attorneys. I reminded the audience that enforcement was primarily the responsibility of the rights owner. Civil litigation is expensive and scale-ups are advised to consider IP insurance. After the formal presentation the attendees divided into break-out groups and I discussed some of the practical issues of some of the attendees.

Safeguarding Your Investment in Convergent Content from Jane Lambert

]]> 171 0 https://cdn.slidesharecdn.com/ss_thumbnails/convergentcontent-240926135635-0ea208ba-thumbnail.jpg?width=120&height=120&fit=bounds presentation Black http://activitystrea.ms/schema/1.0/post

http://activitystrea.ms/schema/1.0/posted

0 Patents and alternatives to patenting.pdf /slideshow/patents-and-alternatives-to-patenting-pdf/271904842 patentsandalternativestopatenting-240919201307-1d67c375
An introduction to UK patent law for independent inventors. The presentation covers the bargain between owners of inventions and the public whereby an owner is granted a monopoly of his or her invention in return for disclosing it sufficiently for it to be made or used by someone with the necessary skills and knowledge of the relevant technology. The slides discuss the requirements for the grant if a patent, namely: - Novelty - Inventiveness - Utility, and - not to have been excluded on other grounds. The patenting process is considered: - search - examination - resolving disputes with examiners - grant. Sources of help such as patent attorneys and IP clinics are discussed. The presentation mentions the European Patent Office and the Patent Cooperation Treaty. The economic benefits of patenting an invention are balanced against the costs. The presentation discusses innovations that cannot be patented such as new plant varieties, semiconductor topographies and data sets. The presentation includes other ways of protecting innovation such as the law of confidence and the Trade Secrets Directive, unregistered design right and copyright. Finally, there is a section on patent litigation in the Patents Court and Intellectual Property Enterprise Court.]]>
An introduction to UK patent law for independent inventors. The presentation covers the bargain between owners of inventions and the public whereby an owner is granted a monopoly of his or her invention in return for disclosing it sufficiently for it to be made or used by someone with the necessary skills and knowledge of the relevant technology. The slides discuss the requirements for the grant if a patent, namely: - Novelty - Inventiveness - Utility, and - not to have been excluded on other grounds. The patenting process is considered: - search - examination - resolving disputes with examiners - grant. Sources of help such as patent attorneys and IP clinics are discussed. The presentation mentions the European Patent Office and the Patent Cooperation Treaty. The economic benefits of patenting an invention are balanced against the costs. The presentation discusses innovations that cannot be patented such as new plant varieties, semiconductor topographies and data sets. The presentation includes other ways of protecting innovation such as the law of confidence and the Trade Secrets Directive, unregistered design right and copyright. Finally, there is a section on patent litigation in the Patents Court and Intellectual Property Enterprise Court.]]> Thu, 19 Sep 2024 20:13:07 GMT /slideshow/patents-and-alternatives-to-patenting-pdf/271904842 nipclaw@slideshare.net(nipclaw) Patents and alternatives to patenting.pdf nipclaw An introduction to UK patent law for independent inventors. The presentation covers the bargain between owners of inventions and the public whereby an owner is granted a monopoly of his or her invention in return for disclosing it sufficiently for it to be made or used by someone with the necessary skills and knowledge of the relevant technology. The slides discuss the requirements for the grant if a patent, namely: - Novelty - Inventiveness - Utility, and - not to have been excluded on other grounds. The patenting process is considered: - search - examination - resolving disputes with examiners - grant. Sources of help such as patent attorneys and IP clinics are discussed. The presentation mentions the European Patent Office and the Patent Cooperation Treaty. The economic benefits of patenting an invention are balanced against the costs. The presentation discusses innovations that cannot be patented such as new plant varieties, semiconductor topographies and data sets. The presentation includes other ways of protecting innovation such as the law of confidence and the Trade Secrets Directive, unregistered design right and copyright. Finally, there is a section on patent litigation in the Patents Court and Intellectual Property Enterprise Court. <img style="border:1px solid #C3E6D8;float:right;" alt="" src="https://cdn.slidesharecdn.com/ss_thumbnails/patentsandalternativestopatenting-240919201307-1d67c375-thumbnail.jpg?width=120&height=120&fit=bounds" /> An introduction to UK patent law for independent inventors. The presentation covers the bargain between owners of inventions and the public whereby an owner is granted a monopoly of his or her invention in return for disclosing it sufficiently for it to be made or used by someone with the necessary skills and knowledge of the relevant technology. The slides discuss the requirements for the grant if a patent, namely: - Novelty - Inventiveness - Utility, and - not to have been excluded on other grounds. The patenting process is considered: - search - examination - resolving disputes with examiners - grant. Sources of help such as patent attorneys and IP clinics are discussed. The presentation mentions the European Patent Office and the Patent Cooperation Treaty. The economic benefits of patenting an invention are balanced against the costs. The presentation discusses innovations that cannot be patented such as new plant varieties, semiconductor topographies and data sets. The presentation includes other ways of protecting innovation such as the law of confidence and the Trade Secrets Directive, unregistered design right and copyright. Finally, there is a section on patent litigation in the Patents Court and Intellectual Property Enterprise Court.

Patents and alternatives to patenting.pdf from Jane Lambert

]]> 138 0 https://cdn.slidesharecdn.com/ss_thumbnails/patentsandalternativestopatenting-240919201307-1d67c375-thumbnail.jpg?width=120&height=120&fit=bounds presentation Black http://activitystrea.ms/schema/1.0/post

http://activitystrea.ms/schema/1.0/posted

0 Small Claims Track Checklist /slideshow/small-claims-track-checklist/258460597 2895456e-4c22-4aef-be3c-d55982757beb-230616204005-d1ab14fd
A checklist for litigants bringing or defending IP actions in the Small Claims Track of the Intellectual Property Enterprise Court. This article covers the court's jurisdiction, its rules and practice, pleadings, disclosure and remedies This article supplements IPEC Small claims Track Guide, CPR Parts 27 and 63 and the Part 27A and Part 63 Practice Directions.]]>
A checklist for litigants bringing or defending IP actions in the Small Claims Track of the Intellectual Property Enterprise Court. This article covers the court's jurisdiction, its rules and practice, pleadings, disclosure and remedies This article supplements IPEC Small claims Track Guide, CPR Parts 27 and 63 and the Part 27A and Part 63 Practice Directions.]]> Fri, 16 Jun 2023 20:40:04 GMT /slideshow/small-claims-track-checklist/258460597 nipclaw@slideshare.net(nipclaw) Small Claims Track Checklist nipclaw A checklist for litigants bringing or defending IP actions in the Small Claims Track of the Intellectual Property Enterprise Court. This article covers the court's jurisdiction, its rules and practice, pleadings, disclosure and remedies This article supplements IPEC Small claims Track Guide, CPR Parts 27 and 63 and the Part 27A and Part 63 Practice Directions. <img style="border:1px solid #C3E6D8;float:right;" alt="" src="https://cdn.slidesharecdn.com/ss_thumbnails/2895456e-4c22-4aef-be3c-d55982757beb-230616204005-d1ab14fd-thumbnail.jpg?width=120&height=120&fit=bounds" /> A checklist for litigants bringing or defending IP actions in the Small Claims Track of the Intellectual Property Enterprise Court. This article covers the court's jurisdiction, its rules and practice, pleadings, disclosure and remedies This article supplements IPEC Small claims Track Guide, CPR Parts 27 and 63 and the Part 27A and Part 63 Practice Directions.

Small Claims Track Checklist from Jane Lambert

]]> 28 0 https://cdn.slidesharecdn.com/ss_thumbnails/2895456e-4c22-4aef-be3c-d55982757beb-230616204005-d1ab14fd-thumbnail.jpg?width=120&height=120&fit=bounds document Black http://activitystrea.ms/schema/1.0/post

http://activitystrea.ms/schema/1.0/posted

0 The UK YORUBA Trade Mark Registration /slideshow/the-uk-yoruba-trade-mark-registration/248884854 theukyorubatrademarkregistration-210602150124
In Nov 2015 a British private limited company registered the words YORUBA and Yoruba as UK trade marks for a wide range of goods and services. Nobody seems to have objected to the registration at the time. On 23 May 2021, another UK incorporated company called The Culture Tree protested vociferously. Many others around the world joined in. It appears that the registered proprietor has agreed to assign the registrations to The Culture Tree which has removed one objection. But should it have been possible to register the name of a nation of 70 million at all? What should be done to prevent issues of this kind in future? ]]>
In Nov 2015 a British private limited company registered the words YORUBA and Yoruba as UK trade marks for a wide range of goods and services. Nobody seems to have objected to the registration at the time. On 23 May 2021, another UK incorporated company called The Culture Tree protested vociferously. Many others around the world joined in. It appears that the registered proprietor has agreed to assign the registrations to The Culture Tree which has removed one objection. But should it have been possible to register the name of a nation of 70 million at all? What should be done to prevent issues of this kind in future? ]]> Wed, 02 Jun 2021 15:01:23 GMT /slideshow/the-uk-yoruba-trade-mark-registration/248884854 nipclaw@slideshare.net(nipclaw) The UK YORUBA Trade Mark Registration nipclaw In Nov 2015 a British private limited company registered the words YORUBA and Yoruba as UK trade marks for a wide range of goods and services. Nobody seems to have objected to the registration at the time. On 23 May 2021, another UK incorporated company called The Culture Tree protested vociferously. Many others around the world joined in. It appears that the registered proprietor has agreed to assign the registrations to The Culture Tree which has removed one objection. But should it have been possible to register the name of a nation of 70 million at all? What should be done to prevent issues of this kind in future? <img style="border:1px solid #C3E6D8;float:right;" alt="" src="https://cdn.slidesharecdn.com/ss_thumbnails/theukyorubatrademarkregistration-210602150124-thumbnail.jpg?width=120&height=120&fit=bounds" /> In Nov 2015 a British private limited company registered the words YORUBA and Yoruba as UK trade marks for a wide range of goods and services. Nobody seems to have objected to the registration at the time. On 23 May 2021, another UK incorporated company called The Culture Tree protested vociferously. Many others around the world joined in. It appears that the registered proprietor has agreed to assign the registrations to The Culture Tree which has removed one objection. But should it have been possible to register the name of a nation of 70 million at all? What should be done to prevent issues of this kind in future?

The UK YORUBA Trade Mark Registration from Jane Lambert

]]> 166 0 https://cdn.slidesharecdn.com/ss_thumbnails/theukyorubatrademarkregistration-210602150124-thumbnail.jpg?width=120&height=120&fit=bounds presentation Black http://activitystrea.ms/schema/1.0/post

http://activitystrea.ms/schema/1.0/posted

0 Copyright Licensing and ICT /slideshow/copyright-licensing-and-ict/246654617 licensingict-210421152024
Some background information for a dialogue with Carwyn Edwards on copyright and ICT organized by North Wales Tech and North Wales Creative on 21 April 2021, ]]>
Some background information for a dialogue with Carwyn Edwards on copyright and ICT organized by North Wales Tech and North Wales Creative on 21 April 2021, ]]> Wed, 21 Apr 2021 15:20:24 GMT /slideshow/copyright-licensing-and-ict/246654617 nipclaw@slideshare.net(nipclaw) Copyright Licensing and ICT nipclaw Some background information for a dialogue with Carwyn Edwards on copyright and ICT organized by North Wales Tech and North Wales Creative on 21 April 2021, <img style="border:1px solid #C3E6D8;float:right;" alt="" src="https://cdn.slidesharecdn.com/ss_thumbnails/licensingict-210421152024-thumbnail.jpg?width=120&height=120&fit=bounds" /> Some background information for a dialogue with Carwyn Edwards on copyright and ICT organized by North Wales Tech and North Wales Creative on 21 April 2021,

Copyright Licensing and ICT from Jane Lambert

]]> 129 0 https://cdn.slidesharecdn.com/ss_thumbnails/licensingict-210421152024-thumbnail.jpg?width=120&height=120&fit=bounds presentation Black http://activitystrea.ms/schema/1.0/post

http://activitystrea.ms/schema/1.0/posted

0 IP After Brexit /slideshow/ip-after-brexit-243140883/243140883 2021-02-19-210220235922
Here are the slides of a presentation that I gave to the Barnsley Business Village on 19 Feb 2021. Unlike my earlier presentations, this was designed for business owners. I discussed what was meant by IP, why monopolies such as patents and exclusive rights such as copyrights were difficult to reconcile with the concept of a single market, the need for the approximation of laws and unitary IP rights and the arrangements made in the withdrawal agreement to continue to protect in the UK intellectual assets that were protected by EU intellectual property rights.]]>
Here are the slides of a presentation that I gave to the Barnsley Business Village on 19 Feb 2021. Unlike my earlier presentations, this was designed for business owners. I discussed what was meant by IP, why monopolies such as patents and exclusive rights such as copyrights were difficult to reconcile with the concept of a single market, the need for the approximation of laws and unitary IP rights and the arrangements made in the withdrawal agreement to continue to protect in the UK intellectual assets that were protected by EU intellectual property rights.]]> Sat, 20 Feb 2021 23:59:22 GMT /slideshow/ip-after-brexit-243140883/243140883 nipclaw@slideshare.net(nipclaw) IP After Brexit nipclaw Here are the slides of a presentation that I gave to the Barnsley Business Village on 19 Feb 2021. Unlike my earlier presentations, this was designed for business owners. I discussed what was meant by IP, why monopolies such as patents and exclusive rights such as copyrights were difficult to reconcile with the concept of a single market, the need for the approximation of laws and unitary IP rights and the arrangements made in the withdrawal agreement to continue to protect in the UK intellectual assets that were protected by EU intellectual property rights. <img style="border:1px solid #C3E6D8;float:right;" alt="" src="https://cdn.slidesharecdn.com/ss_thumbnails/2021-02-19-210220235922-thumbnail.jpg?width=120&height=120&fit=bounds" /> Here are the slides of a presentation that I gave to the Barnsley Business Village on 19 Feb 2021. Unlike my earlier presentations, this was designed for business owners. I discussed what was meant by IP, why monopolies such as patents and exclusive rights such as copyrights were difficult to reconcile with the concept of a single market, the need for the approximation of laws and unitary IP rights and the arrangements made in the withdrawal agreement to continue to protect in the UK intellectual assets that were protected by EU intellectual property rights.

IP After Brexit from Jane Lambert

]]> 577 0 https://cdn.slidesharecdn.com/ss_thumbnails/2021-02-19-210220235922-thumbnail.jpg?width=120&height=120&fit=bounds presentation Black http://activitystrea.ms/schema/1.0/post

http://activitystrea.ms/schema/1.0/posted

0 What every Business in Wales needs to know about Intellectual Property /slideshow/what-every-business-in-wales-needs-to-know-about-intellectual-property/242579120 whateverybusinessinwalesneedstoknowaboutintellectualproperty-210211095847
On 9 Feb 2021, I gave a talk to the Menai Science Park Enterprise Hub entitled "What Every Business in Wales needs to know about Intellectual Property." I prepared these slides for the talk although I did not all of them. Instead, I asked them for their interests which seemed to be registering trade marks and registering designs.]]>
On 9 Feb 2021, I gave a talk to the Menai Science Park Enterprise Hub entitled "What Every Business in Wales needs to know about Intellectual Property." I prepared these slides for the talk although I did not all of them. Instead, I asked them for their interests which seemed to be registering trade marks and registering designs.]]> Thu, 11 Feb 2021 09:58:47 GMT /slideshow/what-every-business-in-wales-needs-to-know-about-intellectual-property/242579120 nipclaw@slideshare.net(nipclaw) What every Business in Wales needs to know about Intellectual Property nipclaw On 9 Feb 2021, I gave a talk to the Menai Science Park Enterprise Hub entitled "What Every Business in Wales needs to know about Intellectual Property." I prepared these slides for the talk although I did not all of them. Instead, I asked them for their interests which seemed to be registering trade marks and registering designs. <img style="border:1px solid #C3E6D8;float:right;" alt="" src="https://cdn.slidesharecdn.com/ss_thumbnails/whateverybusinessinwalesneedstoknowaboutintellectualproperty-210211095847-thumbnail.jpg?width=120&height=120&fit=bounds" /> On 9 Feb 2021, I gave a talk to the Menai Science Park Enterprise Hub entitled "What Every Business in Wales needs to know about Intellectual Property." I prepared these slides for the talk although I did not all of them. Instead, I asked them for their interests which seemed to be registering trade marks and registering designs.

What every Business in Wales needs to know about Intellectual Property from Jane Lambert

]]> 73 0 https://cdn.slidesharecdn.com/ss_thumbnails/whateverybusinessinwalesneedstoknowaboutintellectualproperty-210211095847-thumbnail.jpg?width=120&height=120&fit=bounds presentation Black http://activitystrea.ms/schema/1.0/post

http://activitystrea.ms/schema/1.0/posted

0 What every business in Bradford needs to know about Intellectual Property /slideshow/what-every-business-in-bradford-needs-to-know-about-intellectual-property/242537008 whateverybusinessinbradfordneedstoknowaboutintellectualproperty-210210154623
Yesterday, I was asked by Steve Ding of Webanbywhere to give the first presentation of the BradfordNetwork. I was delighted to accept that invitation because Steve ran a network for the creative sector in Bradford and Barnsley called Bmedi@ about 10 years ago. The network held talks with leading artists, designers, entrepreneurs, inventors and innovators from West Yorkshire and beyond and regular breakfast meetings at the Business and Innovation Centres in Barnsley. Those events were very well attended. Sadly Bmedi@ disbanded several years ago, It has been sorely missed ever since. At present the only events that can take place are online but the BradfordNetwork hopes to hold some live meetings in the Bmedi@ format with the same sort of speakers once the public health emergency is over. ]]>
Yesterday, I was asked by Steve Ding of Webanbywhere to give the first presentation of the BradfordNetwork. I was delighted to accept that invitation because Steve ran a network for the creative sector in Bradford and Barnsley called Bmedi@ about 10 years ago. The network held talks with leading artists, designers, entrepreneurs, inventors and innovators from West Yorkshire and beyond and regular breakfast meetings at the Business and Innovation Centres in Barnsley. Those events were very well attended. Sadly Bmedi@ disbanded several years ago, It has been sorely missed ever since. At present the only events that can take place are online but the BradfordNetwork hopes to hold some live meetings in the Bmedi@ format with the same sort of speakers once the public health emergency is over. ]]> Wed, 10 Feb 2021 15:46:23 GMT /slideshow/what-every-business-in-bradford-needs-to-know-about-intellectual-property/242537008 nipclaw@slideshare.net(nipclaw) What every business in Bradford needs to know about Intellectual Property nipclaw Yesterday, I was asked by Steve Ding of Webanbywhere to give the first presentation of the BradfordNetwork. I was delighted to accept that invitation because Steve ran a network for the creative sector in Bradford and Barnsley called Bmedi@ about 10 years ago. The network held talks with leading artists, designers, entrepreneurs, inventors and innovators from West Yorkshire and beyond and regular breakfast meetings at the Business and Innovation Centres in Barnsley. Those events were very well attended. Sadly Bmedi@ disbanded several years ago, It has been sorely missed ever since. At present the only events that can take place are online but the BradfordNetwork hopes to hold some live meetings in the Bmedi@ format with the same sort of speakers once the public health emergency is over. <img style="border:1px solid #C3E6D8;float:right;" alt="" src="https://cdn.slidesharecdn.com/ss_thumbnails/whateverybusinessinbradfordneedstoknowaboutintellectualproperty-210210154623-thumbnail.jpg?width=120&height=120&fit=bounds" /> Yesterday, I was asked by Steve Ding of Webanbywhere to give the first presentation of the BradfordNetwork. I was delighted to accept that invitation because Steve ran a network for the creative sector in Bradford and Barnsley called Bmedi@ about 10 years ago. The network held talks with leading artists, designers, entrepreneurs, inventors and innovators from West Yorkshire and beyond and regular breakfast meetings at the Business and Innovation Centres in Barnsley. Those events were very well attended. Sadly Bmedi@ disbanded several years ago, It has been sorely missed ever since. At present the only events that can take place are online but the BradfordNetwork hopes to hold some live meetings in the Bmedi@ format with the same sort of speakers once the public health emergency is over.

What every business in Bradford needs to know about Intellectual Property from Jane Lambert

]]> 78 0 https://cdn.slidesharecdn.com/ss_thumbnails/whateverybusinessinbradfordneedstoknowaboutintellectualproperty-210210154623-thumbnail.jpg?width=120&height=120&fit=bounds presentation Black http://activitystrea.ms/schema/1.0/post

http://activitystrea.ms/schema/1.0/posted

0 IP After Brexit /nipclaw/ip-after-brexit ipafterbrexi-210131101104
On 26 Jan 2020, I have a talk over Zoom on "IP after Brexit". My slides are already on �ݺ�ߣshare. These are supplemented by this handout which covers: - Art 50 of the Treaty of European Union - The European Union (Withdrawal) Act 2019 - The statutory instruments made in anticipation of our exiting with a withdrawal agreement - The withdrawal agreement - The European Union (Withdrawal Agreement) Act 2020 - The Trade and Cooperation Agreement - The European Union (Future Relationship) Act 2020. These notes track every legislative change to the requirement in the withdrawal agreement. I also discuss changes to the law not effected by the withdrawal agreement and consider future development of our IP law. ]]>
On 26 Jan 2020, I have a talk over Zoom on "IP after Brexit". My slides are already on �ݺ�ߣshare. These are supplemented by this handout which covers: - Art 50 of the Treaty of European Union - The European Union (Withdrawal) Act 2019 - The statutory instruments made in anticipation of our exiting with a withdrawal agreement - The withdrawal agreement - The European Union (Withdrawal Agreement) Act 2020 - The Trade and Cooperation Agreement - The European Union (Future Relationship) Act 2020. These notes track every legislative change to the requirement in the withdrawal agreement. I also discuss changes to the law not effected by the withdrawal agreement and consider future development of our IP law. ]]> Sun, 31 Jan 2021 10:11:03 GMT /nipclaw/ip-after-brexit nipclaw@slideshare.net(nipclaw) IP After Brexit nipclaw On 26 Jan 2020, I have a talk over Zoom on "IP after Brexit". My slides are already on �ݺ�ߣshare. These are supplemented by this handout which covers: - Art 50 of the Treaty of European Union - The European Union (Withdrawal) Act 2019 - The statutory instruments made in anticipation of our exiting with a withdrawal agreement - The withdrawal agreement - The European Union (Withdrawal Agreement) Act 2020 - The Trade and Cooperation Agreement - The European Union (Future Relationship) Act 2020. These notes track every legislative change to the requirement in the withdrawal agreement. I also discuss changes to the law not effected by the withdrawal agreement and consider future development of our IP law. <img style="border:1px solid #C3E6D8;float:right;" alt="" src="https://cdn.slidesharecdn.com/ss_thumbnails/ipafterbrexi-210131101104-thumbnail.jpg?width=120&height=120&fit=bounds" /> On 26 Jan 2020, I have a talk over Zoom on "IP after Brexit". My slides are already on �ݺ�ߣshare. These are supplemented by this handout which covers: - Art 50 of the Treaty of European Union - The European Union (Withdrawal) Act 2019 - The statutory instruments made in anticipation of our exiting with a withdrawal agreement - The withdrawal agreement - The European Union (Withdrawal Agreement) Act 2020 - The Trade and Cooperation Agreement - The European Union (Future Relationship) Act 2020. These notes track every legislative change to the requirement in the withdrawal agreement. I also discuss changes to the law not effected by the withdrawal agreement and consider future development of our IP law.

IP After Brexit from Jane Lambert

]]> 324 1 https://cdn.slidesharecdn.com/ss_thumbnails/ipafterbrexi-210131101104-thumbnail.jpg?width=120&height=120&fit=bounds document Black http://activitystrea.ms/schema/1.0/post

http://activitystrea.ms/schema/1.0/posted

0 How Brexit has changed IP Law /slideshow/how-brexit-has-changed-ip-law/241868676 howbrexithaschangediplaw-210126195450
At 23:00 on 31 Dec 2020 EU law ceased to apply to the UK including the Regulations establishing the EU Trade Mark, the Community Design and many other rights. A priority in the negotiations for the UK's withdrawal from the EU was the continued protection of the brands, designs and other intellectual assets that been protected by such rights. The withdrawal agreement entered in Jan 2020 provided for EU trade marks, Community designs, Community plant vaieties, database rights and supplementary protection certificates. This presentation considers the relevant provisions of the withdrawal agreementn and the statutes and secondary legislation which implemnted it. Such legislation is now bearing a great part of the UK's IP infrastructure.]]>
At 23:00 on 31 Dec 2020 EU law ceased to apply to the UK including the Regulations establishing the EU Trade Mark, the Community Design and many other rights. A priority in the negotiations for the UK's withdrawal from the EU was the continued protection of the brands, designs and other intellectual assets that been protected by such rights. The withdrawal agreement entered in Jan 2020 provided for EU trade marks, Community designs, Community plant vaieties, database rights and supplementary protection certificates. This presentation considers the relevant provisions of the withdrawal agreementn and the statutes and secondary legislation which implemnted it. Such legislation is now bearing a great part of the UK's IP infrastructure.]]> Tue, 26 Jan 2021 19:54:50 GMT /slideshow/how-brexit-has-changed-ip-law/241868676 nipclaw@slideshare.net(nipclaw) How Brexit has changed IP Law nipclaw At 23:00 on 31 Dec 2020 EU law ceased to apply to the UK including the Regulations establishing the EU Trade Mark, the Community Design and many other rights. A priority in the negotiations for the UK's withdrawal from the EU was the continued protection of the brands, designs and other intellectual assets that been protected by such rights. The withdrawal agreement entered in Jan 2020 provided for EU trade marks, Community designs, Community plant vaieties, database rights and supplementary protection certificates. This presentation considers the relevant provisions of the withdrawal agreementn and the statutes and secondary legislation which implemnted it. Such legislation is now bearing a great part of the UK's IP infrastructure. <img style="border:1px solid #C3E6D8;float:right;" alt="" src="https://cdn.slidesharecdn.com/ss_thumbnails/howbrexithaschangediplaw-210126195450-thumbnail.jpg?width=120&height=120&fit=bounds" /> At 23:00 on 31 Dec 2020 EU law ceased to apply to the UK including the Regulations establishing the EU Trade Mark, the Community Design and many other rights. A priority in the negotiations for the UK's withdrawal from the EU was the continued protection of the brands, designs and other intellectual assets that been protected by such rights. The withdrawal agreement entered in Jan 2020 provided for EU trade marks, Community designs, Community plant vaieties, database rights and supplementary protection certificates. This presentation considers the relevant provisions of the withdrawal agreementn and the statutes and secondary legislation which implemnted it. Such legislation is now bearing a great part of the UK's IP infrastructure.

How Brexit has changed IP Law from Jane Lambert

]]> 311 0 https://cdn.slidesharecdn.com/ss_thumbnails/howbrexithaschangediplaw-210126195450-thumbnail.jpg?width=120&height=120&fit=bounds presentation Black http://activitystrea.ms/schema/1.0/post

http://activitystrea.ms/schema/1.0/posted

0 The Supreme Court Rules on FRAND /slideshow/the-supreme-court-rules-on-frand/238384128 frand-200903115111
These are the slides for a presentation that I shall deliver over Zoom on 2 Sept 2020 at 14:00. It discusses the judgment of the UK Supreme Court in Unwired Planet International Ltd r v Huawei Technologies (UK) Co Ltd [2020] UKSC 37 which was delivered on 26 Aug 2020.]]>
These are the slides for a presentation that I shall deliver over Zoom on 2 Sept 2020 at 14:00. It discusses the judgment of the UK Supreme Court in Unwired Planet International Ltd r v Huawei Technologies (UK) Co Ltd [2020] UKSC 37 which was delivered on 26 Aug 2020.]]> Thu, 03 Sep 2020 11:51:11 GMT /slideshow/the-supreme-court-rules-on-frand/238384128 nipclaw@slideshare.net(nipclaw) The Supreme Court Rules on FRAND nipclaw These are the slides for a presentation that I shall deliver over Zoom on 2 Sept 2020 at 14:00. It discusses the judgment of the UK Supreme Court in Unwired Planet International Ltd r v Huawei Technologies (UK) Co Ltd [2020] UKSC 37 which was delivered on 26 Aug 2020. <img style="border:1px solid #C3E6D8;float:right;" alt="" src="https://cdn.slidesharecdn.com/ss_thumbnails/frand-200903115111-thumbnail.jpg?width=120&height=120&fit=bounds" /> These are the slides for a presentation that I shall deliver over Zoom on 2 Sept 2020 at 14:00. It discusses the judgment of the UK Supreme Court in Unwired Planet International Ltd r v Huawei Technologies (UK) Co Ltd [2020] UKSC 37 which was delivered on 26 Aug 2020.

The Supreme Court Rules on FRAND from Jane Lambert

]]> 246 0 https://cdn.slidesharecdn.com/ss_thumbnails/frand-200903115111-thumbnail.jpg?width=120&height=120&fit=bounds presentation Black http://activitystrea.ms/schema/1.0/post

http://activitystrea.ms/schema/1.0/posted

0 Understanding Intellectual Property /slideshow/understanding-intellectual-property-236481232/236481232 understandingintellectualproperty-200701182221
These are the slides for my presentation to the Menai Science Park Enterprise Hub on 30 June 2020. This presentation explains what is meant by intellectual property and why it is important to business. It considers different types of IP: - patents - trade marks - registered designs - copyrights and related rights, I talked about related rights and how they can be obtained and rights that arise automatically, I discussed enforcement and sources of further information including the Business and IP Centres at the British Library and Liverpool. Finally, I mentioned the network of IP experts to assist M-SParc tenants and others in North Wales.]]>
These are the slides for my presentation to the Menai Science Park Enterprise Hub on 30 June 2020. This presentation explains what is meant by intellectual property and why it is important to business. It considers different types of IP: - patents - trade marks - registered designs - copyrights and related rights, I talked about related rights and how they can be obtained and rights that arise automatically, I discussed enforcement and sources of further information including the Business and IP Centres at the British Library and Liverpool. Finally, I mentioned the network of IP experts to assist M-SParc tenants and others in North Wales.]]> Wed, 01 Jul 2020 18:22:21 GMT /slideshow/understanding-intellectual-property-236481232/236481232 nipclaw@slideshare.net(nipclaw) Understanding Intellectual Property nipclaw These are the slides for my presentation to the Menai Science Park Enterprise Hub on 30 June 2020. This presentation explains what is meant by intellectual property and why it is important to business. It considers different types of IP: - patents - trade marks - registered designs - copyrights and related rights, I talked about related rights and how they can be obtained and rights that arise automatically, I discussed enforcement and sources of further information including the Business and IP Centres at the British Library and Liverpool. Finally, I mentioned the network of IP experts to assist M-SParc tenants and others in North Wales. <img style="border:1px solid #C3E6D8;float:right;" alt="" src="https://cdn.slidesharecdn.com/ss_thumbnails/understandingintellectualproperty-200701182221-thumbnail.jpg?width=120&height=120&fit=bounds" /> These are the slides for my presentation to the Menai Science Park Enterprise Hub on 30 June 2020. This presentation explains what is meant by intellectual property and why it is important to business. It considers different types of IP: - patents - trade marks - registered designs - copyrights and related rights, I talked about related rights and how they can be obtained and rights that arise automatically, I discussed enforcement and sources of further information including the Business and IP Centres at the British Library and Liverpool. Finally, I mentioned the network of IP experts to assist M-SParc tenants and others in North Wales.

Understanding Intellectual Property from Jane Lambert

]]> 152 0 https://cdn.slidesharecdn.com/ss_thumbnails/understandingintellectualproperty-200701182221-thumbnail.jpg?width=120&height=120&fit=bounds presentation Black http://activitystrea.ms/schema/1.0/post

http://activitystrea.ms/schema/1.0/posted

0 Patents 101 Part 1 The Basics /slideshow/patents-101-part-1-the-basics/233044874 patents101-1-200502072530
The handout for the first module of my an introduction to English patent law. A patent is defined as "a monopoly of an invention". That proposition is unpacked to consider what is meant by "monopoly" and what is meant by "invention". These notes discuss the inventor's bargain with the public and its reflection in the specification, They explore what is meant by the teaching of the patent in the description and the monopoly in the claims,]]>
The handout for the first module of my an introduction to English patent law. A patent is defined as "a monopoly of an invention". That proposition is unpacked to consider what is meant by "monopoly" and what is meant by "invention". These notes discuss the inventor's bargain with the public and its reflection in the specification, They explore what is meant by the teaching of the patent in the description and the monopoly in the claims,]]> Sat, 02 May 2020 07:25:30 GMT /slideshow/patents-101-part-1-the-basics/233044874 nipclaw@slideshare.net(nipclaw) Patents 101 Part 1 The Basics nipclaw The handout for the first module of my an introduction to English patent law. A patent is defined as "a monopoly of an invention". That proposition is unpacked to consider what is meant by "monopoly" and what is meant by "invention". These notes discuss the inventor's bargain with the public and its reflection in the specification, They explore what is meant by the teaching of the patent in the description and the monopoly in the claims, <img style="border:1px solid #C3E6D8;float:right;" alt="" src="https://cdn.slidesharecdn.com/ss_thumbnails/patents101-1-200502072530-thumbnail.jpg?width=120&height=120&fit=bounds" /> The handout for the first module of my an introduction to English patent law. A patent is defined as "a monopoly of an invention". That proposition is unpacked to consider what is meant by "monopoly" and what is meant by "invention". These notes discuss the inventor's bargain with the public and its reflection in the specification, They explore what is meant by the teaching of the patent in the description and the monopoly in the claims,

Patents 101 Part 1 The Basics from Jane Lambert

]]> 132 0 https://cdn.slidesharecdn.com/ss_thumbnails/patents101-1-200502072530-thumbnail.jpg?width=120&height=120&fit=bounds document Black http://activitystrea.ms/schema/1.0/post

http://activitystrea.ms/schema/1.0/posted

0 Patents 101 Part 5 - Infringement /nipclaw/patents-101-part-5-infringement-233021399 patents101-5-200501204658
This is the handout for the final module of my introduction to English patent law. It analyses s.60 (1) of the Patents Act 1977 in the light of s.125 (1). It considers para 4 of the Part 63 Practice Direction. It discusses Lord Diplock's judgment in Catnic It mentions s.125 (3) of the Patents Act, art 69 (1) EPC and the Protocol on Interpretation. It analyses Improver, Kirin Amgen, Eli Lilly v Actavis and Icescape. It discusses possible defences and threats actions.]]>
This is the handout for the final module of my introduction to English patent law. It analyses s.60 (1) of the Patents Act 1977 in the light of s.125 (1). It considers para 4 of the Part 63 Practice Direction. It discusses Lord Diplock's judgment in Catnic It mentions s.125 (3) of the Patents Act, art 69 (1) EPC and the Protocol on Interpretation. It analyses Improver, Kirin Amgen, Eli Lilly v Actavis and Icescape. It discusses possible defences and threats actions.]]> Fri, 01 May 2020 20:46:58 GMT /nipclaw/patents-101-part-5-infringement-233021399 nipclaw@slideshare.net(nipclaw) Patents 101 Part 5 - Infringement nipclaw This is the handout for the final module of my introduction to English patent law. It analyses s.60 (1) of the Patents Act 1977 in the light of s.125 (1). It considers para 4 of the Part 63 Practice Direction. It discusses Lord Diplock's judgment in Catnic It mentions s.125 (3) of the Patents Act, art 69 (1) EPC and the Protocol on Interpretation. It analyses Improver, Kirin Amgen, Eli Lilly v Actavis and Icescape. It discusses possible defences and threats actions. <img style="border:1px solid #C3E6D8;float:right;" alt="" src="https://cdn.slidesharecdn.com/ss_thumbnails/patents101-5-200501204658-thumbnail.jpg?width=120&height=120&fit=bounds" /> This is the handout for the final module of my introduction to English patent law. It analyses s.60 (1) of the Patents Act 1977 in the light of s.125 (1). It considers para 4 of the Part 63 Practice Direction. It discusses Lord Diplock's judgment in Catnic It mentions s.125 (3) of the Patents Act, art 69 (1) EPC and the Protocol on Interpretation. It analyses Improver, Kirin Amgen, Eli Lilly v Actavis and Icescape. It discusses possible defences and threats actions.

Patents 101 Part 5 - Infringement from Jane Lambert

]]> 157 0 https://cdn.slidesharecdn.com/ss_thumbnails/patents101-5-200501204658-thumbnail.jpg?width=120&height=120&fit=bounds document Black http://activitystrea.ms/schema/1.0/post

http://activitystrea.ms/schema/1.0/posted

0 Patents101 Part 5 -Infringement /slideshow/patents101-part-5-infringement/233020638 patents101-5-200501202754
This is the final module of my introduction to English patent law. It analyses s.60 (1) of the Patents Act 1977 in the light of s.125 (1). It considers para 4 of the Part 63 Practice Direction. It discusses Lord Diplock's judgment in Catnic It mentions s.125 (3) of the Patents Act, art 69 (1) EPC and the Protocol on Interpretation. It analyses Improver, Kirin Amgen, Eli Lilly v Actavis and Icescape. It discusses possible defences and threats actions.]]>
This is the final module of my introduction to English patent law. It analyses s.60 (1) of the Patents Act 1977 in the light of s.125 (1). It considers para 4 of the Part 63 Practice Direction. It discusses Lord Diplock's judgment in Catnic It mentions s.125 (3) of the Patents Act, art 69 (1) EPC and the Protocol on Interpretation. It analyses Improver, Kirin Amgen, Eli Lilly v Actavis and Icescape. It discusses possible defences and threats actions.]]> Fri, 01 May 2020 20:27:54 GMT /slideshow/patents101-part-5-infringement/233020638 nipclaw@slideshare.net(nipclaw) Patents101 Part 5 -Infringement nipclaw This is the final module of my introduction to English patent law. It analyses s.60 (1) of the Patents Act 1977 in the light of s.125 (1). It considers para 4 of the Part 63 Practice Direction. It discusses Lord Diplock's judgment in Catnic It mentions s.125 (3) of the Patents Act, art 69 (1) EPC and the Protocol on Interpretation. It analyses Improver, Kirin Amgen, Eli Lilly v Actavis and Icescape. It discusses possible defences and threats actions. <img style="border:1px solid #C3E6D8;float:right;" alt="" src="https://cdn.slidesharecdn.com/ss_thumbnails/patents101-5-200501202754-thumbnail.jpg?width=120&height=120&fit=bounds" /> This is the final module of my introduction to English patent law. It analyses s.60 (1) of the Patents Act 1977 in the light of s.125 (1). It considers para 4 of the Part 63 Practice Direction. It discusses Lord Diplock's judgment in Catnic It mentions s.125 (3) of the Patents Act, art 69 (1) EPC and the Protocol on Interpretation. It analyses Improver, Kirin Amgen, Eli Lilly v Actavis and Icescape. It discusses possible defences and threats actions.

Patents101 Part 5 -Infringement from Jane Lambert

]]> 99 1 https://cdn.slidesharecdn.com/ss_thumbnails/patents101-5-200501202754-thumbnail.jpg?width=120&height=120&fit=bounds presentation Black http://activitystrea.ms/schema/1.0/post

http://activitystrea.ms/schema/1.0/posted

0 Patents 101 Part 4 - Applying for a Patent /slideshow/patents-101-part-4-applying-for-a-patent/233020537 patents101-4-200501202528
The handout to the fourth module of my introduction to English patent law. The procedure for applying for a UK patent and European patent (UK) and making PCT applications. Appeals to the Comptroller in the UK and the Boards of Appeal in the EPO. Entitlement and inventorship disputes,]]>
The handout to the fourth module of my introduction to English patent law. The procedure for applying for a UK patent and European patent (UK) and making PCT applications. Appeals to the Comptroller in the UK and the Boards of Appeal in the EPO. Entitlement and inventorship disputes,]]> Fri, 01 May 2020 20:25:28 GMT /slideshow/patents-101-part-4-applying-for-a-patent/233020537 nipclaw@slideshare.net(nipclaw) Patents 101 Part 4 - Applying for a Patent nipclaw The handout to the fourth module of my introduction to English patent law. The procedure for applying for a UK patent and European patent (UK) and making PCT applications. Appeals to the Comptroller in the UK and the Boards of Appeal in the EPO. Entitlement and inventorship disputes, <img style="border:1px solid #C3E6D8;float:right;" alt="" src="https://cdn.slidesharecdn.com/ss_thumbnails/patents101-4-200501202528-thumbnail.jpg?width=120&height=120&fit=bounds" /> The handout to the fourth module of my introduction to English patent law. The procedure for applying for a UK patent and European patent (UK) and making PCT applications. Appeals to the Comptroller in the UK and the Boards of Appeal in the EPO. Entitlement and inventorship disputes,

Patents 101 Part 4 - Applying for a Patent from Jane Lambert

]]> 76 1 https://cdn.slidesharecdn.com/ss_thumbnails/patents101-4-200501202528-thumbnail.jpg?width=120&height=120&fit=bounds document Black http://activitystrea.ms/schema/1.0/post

http://activitystrea.ms/schema/1.0/posted

0 Patents101 Part 4 - Applying for a Patent /slideshow/patents101-part-4-applying-for-a-patent/233020260 patents101-4-200501201849
The fourth module of my introduction to English patent law. The procedure for applying for a UK patent and European patent (UK) and making PCT applications. Appeals to the Comptroller in the UK and the Boards of Appeal in the EPO. Entitlement and inventorship disputes,]]>
The fourth module of my introduction to English patent law. The procedure for applying for a UK patent and European patent (UK) and making PCT applications. Appeals to the Comptroller in the UK and the Boards of Appeal in the EPO. Entitlement and inventorship disputes,]]> Fri, 01 May 2020 20:18:49 GMT /slideshow/patents101-part-4-applying-for-a-patent/233020260 nipclaw@slideshare.net(nipclaw) Patents101 Part 4 - Applying for a Patent nipclaw The fourth module of my introduction to English patent law. The procedure for applying for a UK patent and European patent (UK) and making PCT applications. Appeals to the Comptroller in the UK and the Boards of Appeal in the EPO. Entitlement and inventorship disputes, <img style="border:1px solid #C3E6D8;float:right;" alt="" src="https://cdn.slidesharecdn.com/ss_thumbnails/patents101-4-200501201849-thumbnail.jpg?width=120&height=120&fit=bounds" /> The fourth module of my introduction to English patent law. The procedure for applying for a UK patent and European patent (UK) and making PCT applications. Appeals to the Comptroller in the UK and the Boards of Appeal in the EPO. Entitlement and inventorship disputes,

Patents101 Part 4 - Applying for a Patent from Jane Lambert

]]> 72 0 https://cdn.slidesharecdn.com/ss_thumbnails/patents101-4-200501201849-thumbnail.jpg?width=120&height=120&fit=bounds presentation Black http://activitystrea.ms/schema/1.0/post

http://activitystrea.ms/schema/1.0/posted

0 Patents 101 Part 3 - Patentability /nipclaw/patents-101-part-3-patentability-233019759 patents101-3-200501200611
The handout for the third of my modules on English patent law. This one deals with patentability or the conditions for the grant of a patent, namely novelty, an inventive step, utility and no exclusion from patentability. On novelty, readers are introduced to the concept of the "state of the art" and the test of novelty in General Tire and Rubber v Firestone. As to inventiveness, they are introduced to the concepts of the skilled addressee and common general knowledge and the Supreme Court's decision in Actavis v ICOS. Finally, on excluded matter there is a very close look at the Aerotel and Macrpssan tests.]]>
The handout for the third of my modules on English patent law. This one deals with patentability or the conditions for the grant of a patent, namely novelty, an inventive step, utility and no exclusion from patentability. On novelty, readers are introduced to the concept of the "state of the art" and the test of novelty in General Tire and Rubber v Firestone. As to inventiveness, they are introduced to the concepts of the skilled addressee and common general knowledge and the Supreme Court's decision in Actavis v ICOS. Finally, on excluded matter there is a very close look at the Aerotel and Macrpssan tests.]]> Fri, 01 May 2020 20:06:11 GMT /nipclaw/patents-101-part-3-patentability-233019759 nipclaw@slideshare.net(nipclaw) Patents 101 Part 3 - Patentability nipclaw The handout for the third of my modules on English patent law. This one deals with patentability or the conditions for the grant of a patent, namely novelty, an inventive step, utility and no exclusion from patentability. On novelty, readers are introduced to the concept of the "state of the art" and the test of novelty in General Tire and Rubber v Firestone. As to inventiveness, they are introduced to the concepts of the skilled addressee and common general knowledge and the Supreme Court's decision in Actavis v ICOS. Finally, on excluded matter there is a very close look at the Aerotel and Macrpssan tests. <img style="border:1px solid #C3E6D8;float:right;" alt="" src="https://cdn.slidesharecdn.com/ss_thumbnails/patents101-3-200501200611-thumbnail.jpg?width=120&height=120&fit=bounds" /> The handout for the third of my modules on English patent law. This one deals with patentability or the conditions for the grant of a patent, namely novelty, an inventive step, utility and no exclusion from patentability. On novelty, readers are introduced to the concept of the "state of the art" and the test of novelty in General Tire and Rubber v Firestone. As to inventiveness, they are introduced to the concepts of the skilled addressee and common general knowledge and the Supreme Court's decision in Actavis v ICOS. Finally, on excluded matter there is a very close look at the Aerotel and Macrpssan tests.

Patents 101 Part 3 - Patentability from Jane Lambert

]]> 104 0 https://cdn.slidesharecdn.com/ss_thumbnails/patents101-3-200501200611-thumbnail.jpg?width=120&height=120&fit=bounds document Black http://activitystrea.ms/schema/1.0/post

http://activitystrea.ms/schema/1.0/posted

0 Patents 101 Part 3 - Patentability /slideshow/patents-101-part-3-patentability/233014818 patents101-3-200501181432
The third of my modules on English patent law. This one deals with patentability or the conditions for the grant of a patent, namely novelty, an inventive step, utility and no exclusion from patentability. On novelty, readers are introduced to the concept of the "state of the art" and the test of novelty in General Tire and Rubber v Firestone. As to inventiveness, they are introduced to the concepts of the skilled addressee and common general knowledge and the Supreme Court's decision in Actavis v ICOS. Finally, on excluded matter there is a very close look at the Aerotel and Macrossan tests.]]>
The third of my modules on English patent law. This one deals with patentability or the conditions for the grant of a patent, namely novelty, an inventive step, utility and no exclusion from patentability. On novelty, readers are introduced to the concept of the "state of the art" and the test of novelty in General Tire and Rubber v Firestone. As to inventiveness, they are introduced to the concepts of the skilled addressee and common general knowledge and the Supreme Court's decision in Actavis v ICOS. Finally, on excluded matter there is a very close look at the Aerotel and Macrossan tests.]]> Fri, 01 May 2020 18:14:32 GMT /slideshow/patents-101-part-3-patentability/233014818 nipclaw@slideshare.net(nipclaw) Patents 101 Part 3 - Patentability nipclaw The third of my modules on English patent law. This one deals with patentability or the conditions for the grant of a patent, namely novelty, an inventive step, utility and no exclusion from patentability. On novelty, readers are introduced to the concept of the "state of the art" and the test of novelty in General Tire and Rubber v Firestone. As to inventiveness, they are introduced to the concepts of the skilled addressee and common general knowledge and the Supreme Court's decision in Actavis v ICOS. Finally, on excluded matter there is a very close look at the Aerotel and Macrossan tests. <img style="border:1px solid #C3E6D8;float:right;" alt="" src="https://cdn.slidesharecdn.com/ss_thumbnails/patents101-3-200501181432-thumbnail.jpg?width=120&height=120&fit=bounds" /> The third of my modules on English patent law. This one deals with patentability or the conditions for the grant of a patent, namely novelty, an inventive step, utility and no exclusion from patentability. On novelty, readers are introduced to the concept of the "state of the art" and the test of novelty in General Tire and Rubber v Firestone. As to inventiveness, they are introduced to the concepts of the skilled addressee and common general knowledge and the Supreme Court's decision in Actavis v ICOS. Finally, on excluded matter there is a very close look at the Aerotel and Macrossan tests.

Patents 101 Part 3 - Patentability from Jane Lambert

]]> 87 1 https://cdn.slidesharecdn.com/ss_thumbnails/patents101-3-200501181432-thumbnail.jpg?width=120&height=120&fit=bounds presentation Black http://activitystrea.ms/schema/1.0/post

http://activitystrea.ms/schema/1.0/posted

0 Patents 101 Part 2 The Law /slideshow/patents-101-part-2-the-law-233014425/233014425 patents101-2-200501180428
The handout for the second module of my introduction to English patent law. This covers the sources of law, both legislation and the case law. The module focuses on the Patents Act 1977 and the European Patent Convention. It also introduces readers to the main sets of law reports for patent law, the Reports of Patent Cases ("RPC") and the Fleet Street Reports ("FSR").]]>
The handout for the second module of my introduction to English patent law. This covers the sources of law, both legislation and the case law. The module focuses on the Patents Act 1977 and the European Patent Convention. It also introduces readers to the main sets of law reports for patent law, the Reports of Patent Cases ("RPC") and the Fleet Street Reports ("FSR").]]> Fri, 01 May 2020 18:04:28 GMT /slideshow/patents-101-part-2-the-law-233014425/233014425 nipclaw@slideshare.net(nipclaw) Patents 101 Part 2 The Law nipclaw The handout for the second module of my introduction to English patent law. This covers the sources of law, both legislation and the case law. The module focuses on the Patents Act 1977 and the European Patent Convention. It also introduces readers to the main sets of law reports for patent law, the Reports of Patent Cases ("RPC") and the Fleet Street Reports ("FSR"). <img style="border:1px solid #C3E6D8;float:right;" alt="" src="https://cdn.slidesharecdn.com/ss_thumbnails/patents101-2-200501180428-thumbnail.jpg?width=120&height=120&fit=bounds" /> The handout for the second module of my introduction to English patent law. This covers the sources of law, both legislation and the case law. The module focuses on the Patents Act 1977 and the European Patent Convention. It also introduces readers to the main sets of law reports for patent law, the Reports of Patent Cases ("RPC") and the Fleet Street Reports ("FSR").

Patents 101 Part 2 The Law from Jane Lambert

]]> 72 0 https://cdn.slidesharecdn.com/ss_thumbnails/patents101-2-200501180428-thumbnail.jpg?width=120&height=120&fit=bounds document Black http://activitystrea.ms/schema/1.0/post

http://activitystrea.ms/schema/1.0/posted

0 https://cdn.slidesharecdn.com/profile-photo-nipclaw-48x48.jpg?cb=1726776337 Specialist intellectual property and technology law counsel. Arbitrator and mediator of IP and technology disputes. Mission to bring high quality professional services within reach of those who usually need them most but can often afford them least. Author of "Enforcing Intellectual Property Rights: A Concise Guide for Businesses and Innovative and creative Individuals" published by Gower in March 2009 (http://bit.ly/3c7Hg2). Specialties: Advising and assisting start-ups and other small businesses on legal protection of brands, designs, technology and creative works. nipclaw.blogspot.co.uk/ https://cdn.slidesharecdn.com/ss_thumbnails/convergentcontent-240926135635-0ea208ba-thumbnail.jpg?width=320&height=320&fit=bounds slideshow/safeguarding-your-investment-in-convergent-content/272037755 Safeguarding Your Inve... https://cdn.slidesharecdn.com/ss_thumbnails/patentsandalternativestopatenting-240919201307-1d67c375-thumbnail.jpg?width=320&height=320&fit=bounds slideshow/patents-and-alternatives-to-patenting-pdf/271904842 Patents and alternativ... https://cdn.slidesharecdn.com/ss_thumbnails/2895456e-4c22-4aef-be3c-d55982757beb-230616204005-d1ab14fd-thumbnail.jpg?width=320&height=320&fit=bounds slideshow/small-claims-track-checklist/258460597 Small Claims Track Che...