際際滷shows by User: sarahstim / http://www.slideshare.net/images/logo.gif 際際滷shows by User: sarahstim / Fri, 07 Oct 2016 20:58:29 GMT 際際滷Share feed for 際際滷shows by User: sarahstim #creatorGate: The influence of controversial science, culture, and norms on altmetric results /slideshow/creatorgate-the-influence-of-controversial-science-culture-and-norms-on-altmetric-results/66874845 altmetricsworkshop-161007205829
Work in progress for the Altmetrics16 Workshop at the 3AM (altmetrics conference), Bucharest, Romania on Sept 27, 2016 with Kim Holmberg, Julia Vainio, and Sarah Bowman from Wayne State University and University of Turku, Finland]]>
Work in progress for the Altmetrics16 Workshop at the 3AM (altmetrics conference), Bucharest, Romania on Sept 27, 2016 with Kim Holmberg, Julia Vainio, and Sarah Bowman from Wayne State University and University of Turku, Finland]]> Fri, 07 Oct 2016 20:58:29 GMT /slideshow/creatorgate-the-influence-of-controversial-science-culture-and-norms-on-altmetric-results/66874845 sarahstim@slideshare.net(sarahstim) #creatorGate: The influence of controversial science, culture, and norms on altmetric results sarahstim Work in progress for the Altmetrics16 Workshop at the 3AM (altmetrics conference), Bucharest, Romania on Sept 27, 2016 with Kim Holmberg, Julia Vainio, and Sarah Bowman from Wayne State University and University of Turku, Finland <img style="border:1px solid #C3E6D8;float:right;" alt="" src="https://cdn.slidesharecdn.com/ss_thumbnails/altmetricsworkshop-161007205829-thumbnail.jpg?width=120&amp;height=120&amp;fit=bounds" /><br> Work in progress for the Altmetrics16 Workshop at the 3AM (altmetrics conference), Bucharest, Romania on Sept 27, 2016 with Kim Holmberg, Julia Vainio, and Sarah Bowman from Wayne State University and University of Turku, Finland
#creatorGate: The influence of controversial science, culture, and norms on altmetric results from Wayne State University School of Information Sciences
]]> 123 3 https://cdn.slidesharecdn.com/ss_thumbnails/altmetricsworkshop-161007205829-thumbnail.jpg?width=120&height=120&fit=bounds presentation Black http://activitystrea.ms/schema/1.0/post http://activitystrea.ms/schema/1.0/posted 0 2015.bowman.asist.self presentation /sarahstim/2015bowmanasistself-presentation 2015-151109160223-lva1-app6892
Investigating the self-Presentation of scholars: Presentation at #ASIST2015 #SIGMET15 panel]]>
Investigating the self-Presentation of scholars: Presentation at #ASIST2015 #SIGMET15 panel]]> Mon, 09 Nov 2015 16:02:23 GMT /sarahstim/2015bowmanasistself-presentation sarahstim@slideshare.net(sarahstim) 2015.bowman.asist.self presentation sarahstim Investigating the self-Presentation of scholars: Presentation at #ASIST2015 #SIGMET15 panel <img style="border:1px solid #C3E6D8;float:right;" alt="" src="https://cdn.slidesharecdn.com/ss_thumbnails/2015-151109160223-lva1-app6892-thumbnail.jpg?width=120&amp;height=120&amp;fit=bounds" /><br> Investigating the self-Presentation of scholars: Presentation at #ASIST2015 #SIGMET15 panel
2015.bowman.asist.self presentation from Wayne State University School of Information Sciences
]]> 817 6 https://cdn.slidesharecdn.com/ss_thumbnails/2015-151109160223-lva1-app6892-thumbnail.jpg?width=120&height=120&fit=bounds presentation Black http://activitystrea.ms/schema/1.0/post http://activitystrea.ms/schema/1.0/posted 0 Timothy D Bowman Dissertation Defense /sarahstim/timothy-d-bowman-dissertation-defense 2015-151014110938-lva1-app6892
My presentation for my dissertation defence on Wednesday, May 20th, 2015, 2:00 p.m. in the Department of Information and Library Science, Room LI-00, School of Informatics and Computing, Indiana University Bloomington]]>
My presentation for my dissertation defence on Wednesday, May 20th, 2015, 2:00 p.m. in the Department of Information and Library Science, Room LI-00, School of Informatics and Computing, Indiana University Bloomington]]> Wed, 14 Oct 2015 11:09:38 GMT /sarahstim/timothy-d-bowman-dissertation-defense sarahstim@slideshare.net(sarahstim) Timothy D Bowman Dissertation Defense sarahstim My presentation for my dissertation defence on Wednesday, May 20th, 2015, 2:00 p.m. in the Department of Information and Library Science, Room LI-00, School of Informatics and Computing, Indiana University Bloomington <img style="border:1px solid #C3E6D8;float:right;" alt="" src="https://cdn.slidesharecdn.com/ss_thumbnails/2015-151014110938-lva1-app6892-thumbnail.jpg?width=120&amp;height=120&amp;fit=bounds" /><br> My presentation for my dissertation defence on Wednesday, May 20th, 2015, 2:00 p.m. in the Department of Information and Library Science, Room LI-00, School of Informatics and Computing, Indiana University Bloomington
Timothy D Bowman Dissertation Defense from Wayne State University School of Information Sciences
]]> 1080 10 https://cdn.slidesharecdn.com/ss_thumbnails/2015-151014110938-lva1-app6892-thumbnail.jpg?width=120&height=120&fit=bounds presentation White http://activitystrea.ms/schema/1.0/post http://activitystrea.ms/schema/1.0/posted 0 Mapping dh through heterogeneous communicative practices /slideshow/mapping-dh-through-heterogeneous-communicative-practices/43509845 mappingdhthroughheterogeneouscommunicativepractices-150114093451-conversion-gate01
The goal of this project is to examine the informal and formal communication channels used by the DH community to connect members at the individual, group, and institutional levels. As weve moved toward fulfilling this initial goal, weve considered the scholarly metrics from which DH members are judged and the ways in which they earn academic capital. When we think about scholarly metrics, and even alt-metrics, we feel that the article is still prime. Based on our initial analyses of the data and your responses to our survey, we are now exploring the ramifications of the larger ecosystem of scholarly production where knowledge doesnt necessarily begin or end with the article.]]>
The goal of this project is to examine the informal and formal communication channels used by the DH community to connect members at the individual, group, and institutional levels. As weve moved toward fulfilling this initial goal, weve considered the scholarly metrics from which DH members are judged and the ways in which they earn academic capital. When we think about scholarly metrics, and even alt-metrics, we feel that the article is still prime. Based on our initial analyses of the data and your responses to our survey, we are now exploring the ramifications of the larger ecosystem of scholarly production where knowledge doesnt necessarily begin or end with the article.]]> Wed, 14 Jan 2015 09:34:51 GMT /slideshow/mapping-dh-through-heterogeneous-communicative-practices/43509845 sarahstim@slideshare.net(sarahstim) Mapping dh through heterogeneous communicative practices sarahstim The goal of this project is to examine the informal and formal communication channels used by the DH community to connect members at the individual, group, and institutional levels. As weve moved toward fulfilling this initial goal, weve considered the scholarly metrics from which DH members are judged and the ways in which they earn academic capital. When we think about scholarly metrics, and even alt-metrics, we feel that the article is still prime. Based on our initial analyses of the data and your responses to our survey, we are now exploring the ramifications of the larger ecosystem of scholarly production where knowledge doesnt necessarily begin or end with the article. <img style="border:1px solid #C3E6D8;float:right;" alt="" src="https://cdn.slidesharecdn.com/ss_thumbnails/mappingdhthroughheterogeneouscommunicativepractices-150114093451-conversion-gate01-thumbnail.jpg?width=120&amp;height=120&amp;fit=bounds" /><br> The goal of this project is to examine the informal and formal communication channels used by the DH community to connect members at the individual, group, and institutional levels. As weve moved toward fulfilling this initial goal, weve considered the scholarly metrics from which DH members are judged and the ways in which they earn academic capital. When we think about scholarly metrics, and even alt-metrics, we feel that the article is still prime. Based on our initial analyses of the data and your responses to our survey, we are now exploring the ramifications of the larger ecosystem of scholarly production where knowledge doesnt necessarily begin or end with the article.
Mapping dh through heterogeneous communicative practices from Wayne State University School of Information Sciences
]]> 229 1 https://cdn.slidesharecdn.com/ss_thumbnails/mappingdhthroughheterogeneouscommunicativepractices-150114093451-conversion-gate01-thumbnail.jpg?width=120&height=120&fit=bounds presentation Black http://activitystrea.ms/schema/1.0/post http://activitystrea.ms/schema/1.0/posted 0 Affordance Use Differences Between Personal and Professional Scholarly Tweets /slideshow/2014sigmetbowman/41178274 2014-141105161043-conversion-gate02
INTRODUCTION: It is imperative that scholars investigate social media sites because their policies, configurations, designs, and affordances (the perception of functional attributes of objects by an agent in its environment (Gibson, 1977)) are constantly evolving in order to meet the needs of both their users and investors. The focus of this work is to explore the way in which scholars make use of affordances differently when they are creating personal and professional (as categorized by Amazon Turkers) messages in the microblogging site Twitter. This is important because social media is having an impact on the once invisible backstage activity of scholars, as Priem (Priem, 2014, p. 264) argues, by bringing the background of scholarship out onto the [front] stage. Twitter, the 9th most visited website in the world, claims over 200 million active users who create over 400 million tweets each day (Wickre, 2013); it is a global platform for public self-expression and conversation in real time (Twitter Inc., 2013). Research has shown that approximately 10% to 30% of scholars (Priem, Costello, & Dzuba, 2011; Pscheida, Albrecht, Herbst, Minet, & K旦hler, 2013; Rowlands, Nicholas, Russell, Canty, & Watkinson, 2011) make use of Twitter. This social media site presents a variety of unique affordances with which users can create tweets; these include the @ at symbol used to address messages to particular users (i.e. @user), the retweet feature (i.e., RT @user), the # hashtag symbol (#ASIST) to group tweets and to search for tweets, the ability to add URLs, and the ability to add links to media (such as images and video). It is important to examine the way in which these affordances are used because they can influence the way in which the audience frames (Goffman, 1974) and interprets the tweet. This work is guided by the following questions: Which affordances are scholars using? Do personal or professional tweets vary regarding affordance use? To what extent do scholars use affordances? Does Twitter activity influence affordance use? METHODS: The personal Twitter streams of 445 scholars were downloaded in May 2014 using the Twitter API. The sample was derived from a selection of assistant, associate, full and distinguished professors across eight disciplines (Physics, Biology, Chemistry, Computer Science, Philosophy, English, Sociology, and Anthropology) from 62 Association of American University member universities. In sum, the scholars published a total of 585,879 tweets from 2006 to 2014. The sample of collected tweets from May 2014 totals 289,934 and the amount of tweets retrieved per user ranged between 1 and 3,263. A random subset of 75,000 tweets was placed into Amazons Mechanical Turk (AMT) application and three Turkers categorized each tweet into one of four categories: personal, professional, non-English, and unknown.]]>
INTRODUCTION: It is imperative that scholars investigate social media sites because their policies, configurations, designs, and affordances (the perception of functional attributes of objects by an agent in its environment (Gibson, 1977)) are constantly evolving in order to meet the needs of both their users and investors. The focus of this work is to explore the way in which scholars make use of affordances differently when they are creating personal and professional (as categorized by Amazon Turkers) messages in the microblogging site Twitter. This is important because social media is having an impact on the once invisible backstage activity of scholars, as Priem (Priem, 2014, p. 264) argues, by bringing the background of scholarship out onto the [front] stage. Twitter, the 9th most visited website in the world, claims over 200 million active users who create over 400 million tweets each day (Wickre, 2013); it is a global platform for public self-expression and conversation in real time (Twitter Inc., 2013). Research has shown that approximately 10% to 30% of scholars (Priem, Costello, & Dzuba, 2011; Pscheida, Albrecht, Herbst, Minet, & K旦hler, 2013; Rowlands, Nicholas, Russell, Canty, & Watkinson, 2011) make use of Twitter. This social media site presents a variety of unique affordances with which users can create tweets; these include the @ at symbol used to address messages to particular users (i.e. @user), the retweet feature (i.e., RT @user), the # hashtag symbol (#ASIST) to group tweets and to search for tweets, the ability to add URLs, and the ability to add links to media (such as images and video). It is important to examine the way in which these affordances are used because they can influence the way in which the audience frames (Goffman, 1974) and interprets the tweet. This work is guided by the following questions: Which affordances are scholars using? Do personal or professional tweets vary regarding affordance use? To what extent do scholars use affordances? Does Twitter activity influence affordance use? METHODS: The personal Twitter streams of 445 scholars were downloaded in May 2014 using the Twitter API. The sample was derived from a selection of assistant, associate, full and distinguished professors across eight disciplines (Physics, Biology, Chemistry, Computer Science, Philosophy, English, Sociology, and Anthropology) from 62 Association of American University member universities. In sum, the scholars published a total of 585,879 tweets from 2006 to 2014. The sample of collected tweets from May 2014 totals 289,934 and the amount of tweets retrieved per user ranged between 1 and 3,263. A random subset of 75,000 tweets was placed into Amazons Mechanical Turk (AMT) application and three Turkers categorized each tweet into one of four categories: personal, professional, non-English, and unknown.]]> Wed, 05 Nov 2014 16:10:43 GMT /slideshow/2014sigmetbowman/41178274 sarahstim@slideshare.net(sarahstim) Affordance Use Differences Between Personal and Professional Scholarly Tweets sarahstim INTRODUCTION: It is imperative that scholars investigate social media sites because their policies, configurations, designs, and affordances (the perception of functional attributes of objects by an agent in its environment (Gibson, 1977)) are constantly evolving in order to meet the needs of both their users and investors. The focus of this work is to explore the way in which scholars make use of affordances differently when they are creating personal and professional (as categorized by Amazon Turkers) messages in the microblogging site Twitter. This is important because social media is having an impact on the once invisible backstage activity of scholars, as Priem (Priem, 2014, p. 264) argues, by bringing the background of scholarship out onto the [front] stage. Twitter, the 9th most visited website in the world, claims over 200 million active users who create over 400 million tweets each day (Wickre, 2013); it is a global platform for public self-expression and conversation in real time (Twitter Inc., 2013). Research has shown that approximately 10% to 30% of scholars (Priem, Costello, & Dzuba, 2011; Pscheida, Albrecht, Herbst, Minet, & K旦hler, 2013; Rowlands, Nicholas, Russell, Canty, & Watkinson, 2011) make use of Twitter. This social media site presents a variety of unique affordances with which users can create tweets; these include the @ at symbol used to address messages to particular users (i.e. @user), the retweet feature (i.e., RT @user), the # hashtag symbol (#ASIST) to group tweets and to search for tweets, the ability to add URLs, and the ability to add links to media (such as images and video). It is important to examine the way in which these affordances are used because they can influence the way in which the audience frames (Goffman, 1974) and interprets the tweet. This work is guided by the following questions: Which affordances are scholars using? Do personal or professional tweets vary regarding affordance use? To what extent do scholars use affordances? Does Twitter activity influence affordance use? METHODS: The personal Twitter streams of 445 scholars were downloaded in May 2014 using the Twitter API. The sample was derived from a selection of assistant, associate, full and distinguished professors across eight disciplines (Physics, Biology, Chemistry, Computer Science, Philosophy, English, Sociology, and Anthropology) from 62 Association of American University member universities. In sum, the scholars published a total of 585,879 tweets from 2006 to 2014. The sample of collected tweets from May 2014 totals 289,934 and the amount of tweets retrieved per user ranged between 1 and 3,263. A random subset of 75,000 tweets was placed into Amazons Mechanical Turk (AMT) application and three Turkers categorized each tweet into one of four categories: personal, professional, non-English, and unknown. <img style="border:1px solid #C3E6D8;float:right;" alt="" src="https://cdn.slidesharecdn.com/ss_thumbnails/2014-141105161043-conversion-gate02-thumbnail.jpg?width=120&amp;height=120&amp;fit=bounds" /><br> INTRODUCTION: It is imperative that scholars investigate social media sites because their policies, configurations, designs, and affordances (the perception of functional attributes of objects by an agent in its environment (Gibson, 1977)) are constantly evolving in order to meet the needs of both their users and investors. The focus of this work is to explore the way in which scholars make use of affordances differently when they are creating personal and professional (as categorized by Amazon Turkers) messages in the microblogging site Twitter. This is important because social media is having an impact on the once invisible backstage activity of scholars, as Priem (Priem, 2014, p. 264) argues, by bringing the background of scholarship out onto the [front] stage. Twitter, the 9th most visited website in the world, claims over 200 million active users who create over 400 million tweets each day (Wickre, 2013); it is a global platform for public self-expression and conversation in real time (Twitter Inc., 2013). Research has shown that approximately 10% to 30% of scholars (Priem, Costello, &amp; Dzuba, 2011; Pscheida, Albrecht, Herbst, Minet, &amp; K旦hler, 2013; Rowlands, Nicholas, Russell, Canty, &amp; Watkinson, 2011) make use of Twitter. This social media site presents a variety of unique affordances with which users can create tweets; these include the @ at symbol used to address messages to particular users (i.e. @user), the retweet feature (i.e., RT @user), the # hashtag symbol (#ASIST) to group tweets and to search for tweets, the ability to add URLs, and the ability to add links to media (such as images and video). It is important to examine the way in which these affordances are used because they can influence the way in which the audience frames (Goffman, 1974) and interprets the tweet. This work is guided by the following questions: Which affordances are scholars using? Do personal or professional tweets vary regarding affordance use? To what extent do scholars use affordances? Does Twitter activity influence affordance use? METHODS: The personal Twitter streams of 445 scholars were downloaded in May 2014 using the Twitter API. The sample was derived from a selection of assistant, associate, full and distinguished professors across eight disciplines (Physics, Biology, Chemistry, Computer Science, Philosophy, English, Sociology, and Anthropology) from 62 Association of American University member universities. In sum, the scholars published a total of 585,879 tweets from 2006 to 2014. The sample of collected tweets from May 2014 totals 289,934 and the amount of tweets retrieved per user ranged between 1 and 3,263. A random subset of 75,000 tweets was placed into Amazons Mechanical Turk (AMT) application and three Turkers categorized each tweet into one of four categories: personal, professional, non-English, and unknown.
Affordance Use Differences Between Personal and Professional Scholarly Tweets from Wayne State University School of Information Sciences
]]> 934 8 https://cdn.slidesharecdn.com/ss_thumbnails/2014-141105161043-conversion-gate02-thumbnail.jpg?width=120&height=120&fit=bounds presentation Black http://activitystrea.ms/schema/1.0/post http://activitystrea.ms/schema/1.0/posted 0 Bowman.2014 nordicworkshop /slideshow/bowman2014-nordicworkshop/39518016 bowman-140925072451-phpapp01
Tweet or Publish? Presentation at the 19th Nordic Workshop on Bibliomterics and Research Policy]]>
Tweet or Publish? Presentation at the 19th Nordic Workshop on Bibliomterics and Research Policy]]> Thu, 25 Sep 2014 07:24:51 GMT /slideshow/bowman2014-nordicworkshop/39518016 sarahstim@slideshare.net(sarahstim) Bowman.2014 nordicworkshop sarahstim Tweet or Publish? Presentation at the 19th Nordic Workshop on Bibliomterics and Research Policy <img style="border:1px solid #C3E6D8;float:right;" alt="" src="https://cdn.slidesharecdn.com/ss_thumbnails/bowman-140925072451-phpapp01-thumbnail.jpg?width=120&amp;height=120&amp;fit=bounds" /><br> Tweet or Publish? Presentation at the 19th Nordic Workshop on Bibliomterics and Research Policy
Bowman.2014 nordicworkshop from Wayne State University School of Information Sciences
]]> 300 3 https://cdn.slidesharecdn.com/ss_thumbnails/bowman-140925072451-phpapp01-thumbnail.jpg?width=120&height=120&fit=bounds presentation Black http://activitystrea.ms/schema/1.0/post http://activitystrea.ms/schema/1.0/posted 0 Sigmet twinkletweet presentation /slideshow/sigmet-twinkletweet-presentation/27935727 sigmet-twinkletweetpresentation-131105134414-phpapp01
]]>
]]> Tue, 05 Nov 2013 13:44:14 GMT /slideshow/sigmet-twinkletweet-presentation/27935727 sarahstim@slideshare.net(sarahstim) Sigmet twinkletweet presentation sarahstim <img style="border:1px solid #C3E6D8;float:right;" alt="" src="https://cdn.slidesharecdn.com/ss_thumbnails/sigmet-twinkletweetpresentation-131105134414-phpapp01-thumbnail.jpg?width=120&amp;height=120&amp;fit=bounds" /><br>
Sigmet twinkletweet presentation from Wayne State University School of Information Sciences
]]> 736 3 https://cdn.slidesharecdn.com/ss_thumbnails/sigmet-twinkletweetpresentation-131105134414-phpapp01-thumbnail.jpg?width=120&height=120&fit=bounds presentation Black http://activitystrea.ms/schema/1.0/post http://activitystrea.ms/schema/1.0/posted 0 https://cdn.slidesharecdn.com/profile-photo-sarahstim-48x48.jpg?cb=1666290396 My broad research interests include social informatics, scholarly communication, bibliometrics, scientometrics, digital humanities, big data, information architecture, web programming, and web design. My current academic work involves exploring the theories, frameworks, and methods used to examine both the management of social relationships in social network sites and the effects of social network site (SNS) use as it pertains to scholarly communication. I'm particularly interested in using Erving Goffman's impression management and frame analysis concepts as a lens from which I examine scholarly activity in computer-mediated environments. www.tdbowman.com https://cdn.slidesharecdn.com/ss_thumbnails/altmetricsworkshop-161007205829-thumbnail.jpg?width=320&height=320&fit=bounds slideshow/creatorgate-the-influence-of-controversial-science-culture-and-norms-on-altmetric-results/66874845 #creatorGate: The infl... https://cdn.slidesharecdn.com/ss_thumbnails/2015-151109160223-lva1-app6892-thumbnail.jpg?width=320&height=320&fit=bounds sarahstim/2015bowmanasistself-presentation 2015.bowman.asist.self... https://cdn.slidesharecdn.com/ss_thumbnails/2015-151014110938-lva1-app6892-thumbnail.jpg?width=320&height=320&fit=bounds sarahstim/timothy-d-bowman-dissertation-defense Timothy D Bowman Disse...