ºÝºÝߣshows by User: selenasavic / http://www.slideshare.net/images/logo.gif ºÝºÝߣshows by User: selenasavic / Fri, 19 Jun 2015 14:14:48 GMT ºÝºÝߣShare feed for ºÝºÝߣshows by User: selenasavic Connectivity in action/form. A model for evaluating spatial impacts of wireless communication /slideshow/connectivity-in-actionform-a-model-for-evaluating-spatial-impacts-of-wireless-communication/49602474 present-150619141448-lva1-app6892
This presentation introduces a weak argument that architecturality of wireless communication infrastructure results from the fact that wireless signals, like architecture, incorporate agency. By agency, we mean a capacity of a system to autonomously and adaptively regulates its relationship/goals within a certain environment. The weakness off this argument resides mainly in the fact that agency is not the most perceived property of architecture - it is a contested feature and requires complicated argumentation. Nevertheless, it will be demonstrated how it is exactly here that we should build foundations for a model for evaluating spatial impacts of wireless communication. Wireless communication signals partake in the production of urbanity as connectivity that is or not available to people and devices. Ultimately, they outline a binary spatial configuration: connected and disconnected places. In this respect, we regard waves as structural infrastructure. We examine the materiality of connectivity - a phenomenon beyond mere functioning connection – the form given to wirelessness through action.]]>
This presentation introduces a weak argument that architecturality of wireless communication infrastructure results from the fact that wireless signals, like architecture, incorporate agency. By agency, we mean a capacity of a system to autonomously and adaptively regulates its relationship/goals within a certain environment. The weakness off this argument resides mainly in the fact that agency is not the most perceived property of architecture - it is a contested feature and requires complicated argumentation. Nevertheless, it will be demonstrated how it is exactly here that we should build foundations for a model for evaluating spatial impacts of wireless communication. Wireless communication signals partake in the production of urbanity as connectivity that is or not available to people and devices. Ultimately, they outline a binary spatial configuration: connected and disconnected places. In this respect, we regard waves as structural infrastructure. We examine the materiality of connectivity - a phenomenon beyond mere functioning connection – the form given to wirelessness through action.]]> Fri, 19 Jun 2015 14:14:48 GMT /slideshow/connectivity-in-actionform-a-model-for-evaluating-spatial-impacts-of-wireless-communication/49602474 selenasavic@slideshare.net(selenasavic) Connectivity in action/form. A model for evaluating spatial impacts of wireless communication selenasavic This presentation introduces a weak argument that architecturality of wireless communication infrastructure results from the fact that wireless signals, like architecture, incorporate agency. By agency, we mean a capacity of a system to autonomously and adaptively regulates its relationship/goals within a certain environment. The weakness off this argument resides mainly in the fact that agency is not the most perceived property of architecture - it is a contested feature and requires complicated argumentation. Nevertheless, it will be demonstrated how it is exactly here that we should build foundations for a model for evaluating spatial impacts of wireless communication. Wireless communication signals partake in the production of urbanity as connectivity that is or not available to people and devices. Ultimately, they outline a binary spatial configuration: connected and disconnected places. In this respect, we regard waves as structural infrastructure. We examine the materiality of connectivity - a phenomenon beyond mere functioning connection – the form given to wirelessness through action. <img style="border:1px solid #C3E6D8;float:right;" alt="" src="https://cdn.slidesharecdn.com/ss_thumbnails/present-150619141448-lva1-app6892-thumbnail.jpg?width=120&amp;height=120&amp;fit=bounds" /><br> This presentation introduces a weak argument that architecturality of wireless communication infrastructure results from the fact that wireless signals, like architecture, incorporate agency. By agency, we mean a capacity of a system to autonomously and adaptively regulates its relationship/goals within a certain environment. The weakness off this argument resides mainly in the fact that agency is not the most perceived property of architecture - it is a contested feature and requires complicated argumentation. Nevertheless, it will be demonstrated how it is exactly here that we should build foundations for a model for evaluating spatial impacts of wireless communication. Wireless communication signals partake in the production of urbanity as connectivity that is or not available to people and devices. Ultimately, they outline a binary spatial configuration: connected and disconnected places. In this respect, we regard waves as structural infrastructure. We examine the materiality of connectivity - a phenomenon beyond mere functioning connection – the form given to wirelessness through action.
Connectivity in action/form. A model for evaluating spatial impacts of wireless communication from Selena Savic
]]> 342 3 https://cdn.slidesharecdn.com/ss_thumbnails/present-150619141448-lva1-app6892-thumbnail.jpg?width=120&height=120&fit=bounds presentation 000000 http://activitystrea.ms/schema/1.0/post http://activitystrea.ms/schema/1.0/posted 0 https://cdn.slidesharecdn.com/profile-photo-selenasavic-48x48.jpg?cb=1520632087 Architect, designer and researcher, interested in architectural qualities of wireless communication technologies and the way it mediates the space we inhabit. Combined with the background in urban planning and research in the cities, her interests give rise to a practice of interrogative design of objects and spaces.