�ݺ�ߣshows by User: utkarshk02

�ݺ�ߣshows by User: utkarshk02 / http://www.slideshare.net/images/logo.gif �ݺ�ߣshows by User: utkarshk02 / Sat, 07 Mar 2015 10:57:11 GMT �ݺ�ߣShare feed for �ݺ�ߣshows by User: utkarshk02 SALE AS A MODE OF TRANSFER- Sections 54 to 57 of The Transfer of Property Act, 1882 /slideshow/sale-as-a-mode-of-transfer-sections-54-to-57-of-the-transfer-of-property-act-1882/45554045 sale-150307105711-conversion-gate01
SALE AS A MODE OF TRANSFER- Sections 54 to 57 of The Transfer of Property Act, 1882]]>
SALE AS A MODE OF TRANSFER- Sections 54 to 57 of The Transfer of Property Act, 1882]]> Sat, 07 Mar 2015 10:57:11 GMT /slideshow/sale-as-a-mode-of-transfer-sections-54-to-57-of-the-transfer-of-property-act-1882/45554045 utkarshk02@slideshare.net(utkarshk02) SALE AS A MODE OF TRANSFER- Sections 54 to 57 of The Transfer of Property Act, 1882 utkarshk02 SALE AS A MODE OF TRANSFER- Sections 54 to 57 of The Transfer of Property Act, 1882 <img style="border:1px solid #C3E6D8;float:right;" alt="" src="https://cdn.slidesharecdn.com/ss_thumbnails/sale-150307105711-conversion-gate01-thumbnail.jpg?width=120&height=120&fit=bounds" /> SALE AS A MODE OF TRANSFER- Sections 54 to 57 of The Transfer of Property Act, 1882

SALE AS A MODE OF TRANSFER- Sections 54 to 57 of The Transfer of Property Act, 1882 from Utkarsh Kumar

]]> 34386 8 https://cdn.slidesharecdn.com/ss_thumbnails/sale-150307105711-conversion-gate01-thumbnail.jpg?width=120&height=120&fit=bounds document Black http://activitystrea.ms/schema/1.0/post

http://activitystrea.ms/schema/1.0/posted

0 L. Chandra Kumar v/s U.O.I [A.I.R 1997 SC 1125]- IRAC /utkarshk02/l-chandra-kumar-vs-uoi-air-1997-sc-1125-irac lchandrakumar-150307100723-conversion-gate01
This research deals with the critical analysis of the case, L. Chandra Kumar v. U.O.I [1997]. Efforts have been made to explain the jurisprudential premise of Articles 323-A and 323-B of the Constitution of India, 1950. Efforts have been made to understand the legislative intent behind the Administrative Tribunals Act of 1985.]]>
This research deals with the critical analysis of the case, L. Chandra Kumar v. U.O.I [1997]. Efforts have been made to explain the jurisprudential premise of Articles 323-A and 323-B of the Constitution of India, 1950. Efforts have been made to understand the legislative intent behind the Administrative Tribunals Act of 1985.]]> Sat, 07 Mar 2015 10:07:23 GMT /utkarshk02/l-chandra-kumar-vs-uoi-air-1997-sc-1125-irac utkarshk02@slideshare.net(utkarshk02) L. Chandra Kumar v/s U.O.I [A.I.R 1997 SC 1125]- IRAC utkarshk02 This research deals with the critical analysis of the case, L. Chandra Kumar v. U.O.I [1997]. Efforts have been made to explain the jurisprudential premise of Articles 323-A and 323-B of the Constitution of India, 1950. Efforts have been made to understand the legislative intent behind the Administrative Tribunals Act of 1985. <img style="border:1px solid #C3E6D8;float:right;" alt="" src="https://cdn.slidesharecdn.com/ss_thumbnails/lchandrakumar-150307100723-conversion-gate01-thumbnail.jpg?width=120&height=120&fit=bounds" /> This research deals with the critical analysis of the case, L. Chandra Kumar v. U.O.I [1997]. Efforts have been made to explain the jurisprudential premise of Articles 323-A and 323-B of the Constitution of India, 1950. Efforts have been made to understand the legislative intent behind the Administrative Tribunals Act of 1985.

L. Chandra Kumar v/s U.O.I [A.I.R 1997 SC 1125]- IRAC from Utkarsh Kumar

]]> 7344 8 https://cdn.slidesharecdn.com/ss_thumbnails/lchandrakumar-150307100723-conversion-gate01-thumbnail.jpg?width=120&height=120&fit=bounds document Black http://activitystrea.ms/schema/1.0/post

http://activitystrea.ms/schema/1.0/posted

0 Anti-corruption laws are not sufficient and effective to curb corruption in India- An Empirical Research /slideshow/anticorruption-laws-are-not-sufficient-and-effective-to-curb-corruption-in-india-an-empirical-research/45552833 introduction-legalresoning-research-150307100059-conversion-gate01
Anti-corruption laws are not sufficient and effective to curb corruption in India- An Empirical Research ]]>
Anti-corruption laws are not sufficient and effective to curb corruption in India- An Empirical Research ]]> Sat, 07 Mar 2015 10:00:58 GMT /slideshow/anticorruption-laws-are-not-sufficient-and-effective-to-curb-corruption-in-india-an-empirical-research/45552833 utkarshk02@slideshare.net(utkarshk02) Anti-corruption laws are not sufficient and effective to curb corruption in India- An Empirical Research utkarshk02 Anti-corruption laws are not sufficient and effective to curb corruption in India- An Empirical Research <img style="border:1px solid #C3E6D8;float:right;" alt="" src="https://cdn.slidesharecdn.com/ss_thumbnails/introduction-legalresoning-research-150307100059-conversion-gate01-thumbnail.jpg?width=120&height=120&fit=bounds" /> Anti-corruption laws are not sufficient and effective to curb corruption in India- An Empirical Research

Anti-corruption laws are not sufficient and effective to curb corruption in India- An Empirical Research from Utkarsh Kumar

]]> 1846 6 https://cdn.slidesharecdn.com/ss_thumbnails/introduction-legalresoning-research-150307100059-conversion-gate01-thumbnail.jpg?width=120&height=120&fit=bounds document Black http://activitystrea.ms/schema/1.0/post

http://activitystrea.ms/schema/1.0/posted

0 APPLICATION OF INTERLINKING AND HYPER-LINKING: Standard Oil Co. Vs United States, 340 US, 54 (1950) /utkarshk02/application-of-interlinking-and-hyperlinking-standard-oil-co-vs-united-states-340-us-54-1950 interlinkingandhyperlinking-150307095413-conversion-gate01
APPLICATION OF INTERLINKING AND HYPER-LINKING: Standard Oil Co. Vs United States, 340 US, 54 (1950)]]>
APPLICATION OF INTERLINKING AND HYPER-LINKING: Standard Oil Co. Vs United States, 340 US, 54 (1950)]]> Sat, 07 Mar 2015 09:54:13 GMT /utkarshk02/application-of-interlinking-and-hyperlinking-standard-oil-co-vs-united-states-340-us-54-1950 utkarshk02@slideshare.net(utkarshk02) APPLICATION OF INTERLINKING AND HYPER-LINKING: Standard Oil Co. Vs United States, 340 US, 54 (1950) utkarshk02 APPLICATION OF INTERLINKING AND HYPER-LINKING: Standard Oil Co. Vs United States, 340 US, 54 (1950) <img style="border:1px solid #C3E6D8;float:right;" alt="" src="https://cdn.slidesharecdn.com/ss_thumbnails/interlinkingandhyperlinking-150307095413-conversion-gate01-thumbnail.jpg?width=120&height=120&fit=bounds" /> APPLICATION OF INTERLINKING AND HYPER-LINKING: Standard Oil Co. Vs United States, 340 US, 54 (1950)

APPLICATION OF INTERLINKING AND HYPER-LINKING: Standard Oil Co. Vs United States, 340 US, 54 (1950) from Utkarsh Kumar

]]> 989 4 https://cdn.slidesharecdn.com/ss_thumbnails/interlinkingandhyperlinking-150307095413-conversion-gate01-thumbnail.jpg?width=120&height=120&fit=bounds document Black http://activitystrea.ms/schema/1.0/post

http://activitystrea.ms/schema/1.0/posted

0 Investigation with respect to the cognizable offence by police- FIR, Chargesheet, police Diary , and Inquest report /slideshow/investigation-with-respect-to-the-cognizable-offence-by-police-fir-chargesheet-police-diary-and-inquest-report/45552520 crpc-150307094416-conversion-gate01
]]>
]]> Sat, 07 Mar 2015 09:44:16 GMT /slideshow/investigation-with-respect-to-the-cognizable-offence-by-police-fir-chargesheet-police-diary-and-inquest-report/45552520 utkarshk02@slideshare.net(utkarshk02) Investigation with respect to the cognizable offence by police- FIR, Chargesheet, police Diary , and Inquest report utkarshk02 <img style="border:1px solid #C3E6D8;float:right;" alt="" src="https://cdn.slidesharecdn.com/ss_thumbnails/crpc-150307094416-conversion-gate01-thumbnail.jpg?width=120&height=120&fit=bounds" />

Investigation with respect to the cognizable offence by police- FIR, Chargesheet, police Diary , and Inquest report from Utkarsh Kumar

]]> 17550 4 https://cdn.slidesharecdn.com/ss_thumbnails/crpc-150307094416-conversion-gate01-thumbnail.jpg?width=120&height=120&fit=bounds document Black http://activitystrea.ms/schema/1.0/post

http://activitystrea.ms/schema/1.0/posted

0 This entry analyses the Corfu Channel Case, the first case before the International Court of Justice, concerning dammage to British navy ships due to mines in Albanian waters /utkarshk02/this-entry-analyses-the-corfu-channel-case-the-first-case-before-the-international-court-of-justice-concerning-dammage-to-british-navy-ships-due-to-mines-in-albanian-waters corfucannelcase-150307094156-conversion-gate01
This entry analyses the Corfu Channel Case, the first case before the International Court of Justice, concerning dammage to British navy ships due to mines in Albanian waters]]>
This entry analyses the Corfu Channel Case, the first case before the International Court of Justice, concerning dammage to British navy ships due to mines in Albanian waters]]> Sat, 07 Mar 2015 09:41:56 GMT /utkarshk02/this-entry-analyses-the-corfu-channel-case-the-first-case-before-the-international-court-of-justice-concerning-dammage-to-british-navy-ships-due-to-mines-in-albanian-waters utkarshk02@slideshare.net(utkarshk02) This entry analyses the Corfu Channel Case, the first case before the International Court of Justice, concerning dammage to British navy ships due to mines in Albanian waters utkarshk02 This entry analyses the Corfu Channel Case, the first case before the International Court of Justice, concerning dammage to British navy ships due to mines in Albanian waters <img style="border:1px solid #C3E6D8;float:right;" alt="" src="https://cdn.slidesharecdn.com/ss_thumbnails/corfucannelcase-150307094156-conversion-gate01-thumbnail.jpg?width=120&height=120&fit=bounds" /> This entry analyses the Corfu Channel Case, the first case before the International Court of Justice, concerning dammage to British navy ships due to mines in Albanian waters

This entry analyses the Corfu Channel Case, the first case before the International Court of Justice, concerning dammage to British navy ships due to mines in Albanian waters from Utkarsh Kumar

]]> 6949 12 https://cdn.slidesharecdn.com/ss_thumbnails/corfucannelcase-150307094156-conversion-gate01-thumbnail.jpg?width=120&height=120&fit=bounds document Black http://activitystrea.ms/schema/1.0/post

http://activitystrea.ms/schema/1.0/posted

0 ANTICIPATORY BAIL- Section 438 in The Code Of Criminal Procedure, 1973 /slideshow/anticipatory-bail-section-438-in-the-code-of-criminal-procedure-1973/45552348 anticipatorybail-150307093438-conversion-gate01
ANTICIPATORY BAIL Section 438 in The Code Of Criminal Procedure, 1973]]>
ANTICIPATORY BAIL Section 438 in The Code Of Criminal Procedure, 1973]]> Sat, 07 Mar 2015 09:34:38 GMT /slideshow/anticipatory-bail-section-438-in-the-code-of-criminal-procedure-1973/45552348 utkarshk02@slideshare.net(utkarshk02) ANTICIPATORY BAIL- Section 438 in The Code Of Criminal Procedure, 1973 utkarshk02 ANTICIPATORY BAIL Section 438 in The Code Of Criminal Procedure, 1973 <img style="border:1px solid #C3E6D8;float:right;" alt="" src="https://cdn.slidesharecdn.com/ss_thumbnails/anticipatorybail-150307093438-conversion-gate01-thumbnail.jpg?width=120&height=120&fit=bounds" /> ANTICIPATORY BAIL Section 438 in The Code Of Criminal Procedure, 1973

ANTICIPATORY BAIL- Section 438 in The Code Of Criminal Procedure, 1973 from Utkarsh Kumar

]]> 4335 8 https://cdn.slidesharecdn.com/ss_thumbnails/anticipatorybail-150307093438-conversion-gate01-thumbnail.jpg?width=120&height=120&fit=bounds document Black http://activitystrea.ms/schema/1.0/post

http://activitystrea.ms/schema/1.0/posted

0 VALIDITY OF INCLUSION OF RIGHT TO PROPERTY IN THE CONSTITUTION- Article 40.3.2° and Article 43 /slideshow/constitution-law-assessment/45552240 constitutionlawassessment-150307092914-conversion-gate01
The assessment will analyze the validity and relevance of the fundamental right of property in light with the two views provided by Review Group supported by later developments and case laws concerning the given issue.]]>
The assessment will analyze the validity and relevance of the fundamental right of property in light with the two views provided by Review Group supported by later developments and case laws concerning the given issue.]]> Sat, 07 Mar 2015 09:29:14 GMT /slideshow/constitution-law-assessment/45552240 utkarshk02@slideshare.net(utkarshk02) VALIDITY OF INCLUSION OF RIGHT TO PROPERTY IN THE CONSTITUTION- Article 40.3.2° and Article 43 utkarshk02 The assessment will analyze the validity and relevance of the fundamental right of property in light with the two views provided by Review Group supported by later developments and case laws concerning the given issue. <img style="border:1px solid #C3E6D8;float:right;" alt="" src="https://cdn.slidesharecdn.com/ss_thumbnails/constitutionlawassessment-150307092914-conversion-gate01-thumbnail.jpg?width=120&height=120&fit=bounds" /> The assessment will analyze the validity and relevance of the fundamental right of property in light with the two views provided by Review Group supported by later developments and case laws concerning the given issue.

VALIDITY OF INCLUSION OF RIGHT TO PROPERTY IN THE CONSTITUTION- Article 40.3.2属 and Article 43 from Utkarsh Kumar

]]> 1216 3 https://cdn.slidesharecdn.com/ss_thumbnails/constitutionlawassessment-150307092914-conversion-gate01-thumbnail.jpg?width=120&height=120&fit=bounds document Black http://activitystrea.ms/schema/1.0/post

http://activitystrea.ms/schema/1.0/posted

0 Admissibility of Parliamentary Debates - Crilly v Farrington /slideshow/admissibility-of-parliamentary-debates-crilly-v-farrington/45552228 lawandlegislationassessment-150307092830-conversion-gate01
The project will assess the decision of the Supreme Court in Crilly v Farrington [2001] 3 IR 251 insofar as it relates to the question of whether the courts should have regard to parliamentary debates when interpreting legislation.]]>
The project will assess the decision of the Supreme Court in Crilly v Farrington [2001] 3 IR 251 insofar as it relates to the question of whether the courts should have regard to parliamentary debates when interpreting legislation.]]> Sat, 07 Mar 2015 09:28:30 GMT /slideshow/admissibility-of-parliamentary-debates-crilly-v-farrington/45552228 utkarshk02@slideshare.net(utkarshk02) Admissibility of Parliamentary Debates - Crilly v Farrington utkarshk02 The project will assess the decision of the Supreme Court in Crilly v Farrington [2001] 3 IR 251 insofar as it relates to the question of whether the courts should have regard to parliamentary debates when interpreting legislation. <img style="border:1px solid #C3E6D8;float:right;" alt="" src="https://cdn.slidesharecdn.com/ss_thumbnails/lawandlegislationassessment-150307092830-conversion-gate01-thumbnail.jpg?width=120&height=120&fit=bounds" /> The project will assess the decision of the Supreme Court in Crilly v Farrington [2001] 3 IR 251 insofar as it relates to the question of whether the courts should have regard to parliamentary debates when interpreting legislation.

Admissibility of Parliamentary Debates - Crilly v Farrington from Utkarsh Kumar

]]> 649 1 https://cdn.slidesharecdn.com/ss_thumbnails/lawandlegislationassessment-150307092830-conversion-gate01-thumbnail.jpg?width=120&height=120&fit=bounds document Black http://activitystrea.ms/schema/1.0/post

http://activitystrea.ms/schema/1.0/posted

0 Validity of contingent and conditional bequests /slideshow/validity-of-contingent-and-conditional-bequests/37130031 validityofcontingentandconditionalbequests-140718105221-phpapp02
Introduction – ‘Vest’ meaning and differences Contingent Bequests Conditional Bequests Validity of conditions subsequent & forfeiture of bequest – with reference to S. 134 Defeasance clause – distinguished from repugnant clause Conclusion]]>
Introduction – ‘Vest’ meaning and differences Contingent Bequests Conditional Bequests Validity of conditions subsequent & forfeiture of bequest – with reference to S. 134 Defeasance clause – distinguished from repugnant clause Conclusion]]> Fri, 18 Jul 2014 10:52:21 GMT /slideshow/validity-of-contingent-and-conditional-bequests/37130031 utkarshk02@slideshare.net(utkarshk02) Validity of contingent and conditional bequests utkarshk02 Introduction – ‘Vest’ meaning and differences Contingent Bequests Conditional Bequests Validity of conditions subsequent & forfeiture of bequest – with reference to S. 134 Defeasance clause – distinguished from repugnant clause Conclusion <img style="border:1px solid #C3E6D8;float:right;" alt="" src="https://cdn.slidesharecdn.com/ss_thumbnails/validityofcontingentandconditionalbequests-140718105221-phpapp02-thumbnail.jpg?width=120&height=120&fit=bounds" /> Introduction – ‘Vest’ meaning and differences Contingent Bequests Conditional Bequests Validity of conditions subsequent & forfeiture of bequest – with reference to S. 134 Defeasance clause – distinguished from repugnant clause Conclusion

Validity of contingent and conditional bequests from Utkarsh Kumar

]]> 9908 10 https://cdn.slidesharecdn.com/ss_thumbnails/validityofcontingentandconditionalbequests-140718105221-phpapp02-thumbnail.jpg?width=120&height=120&fit=bounds presentation Black http://activitystrea.ms/schema/1.0/post

http://activitystrea.ms/schema/1.0/posted

0 THE NAZ FOUNDATION CASE (Section 377) - Interlinking and Hyperlinking /slideshow/the-naz-foundation-case-section-377-interlinking-and-hyperlinking/32027491 thenazfoundationcasesection377interlinkingandhyperlinking-140307033527-phpapp01
The Naz Foundation (India) Trust, the original petitioner in the constitutional challenge to Section 377, IPC, has filed a petition seeking review of the judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Suresh Kumar Koushal v. Naz Foundation (India) Trust (Civil Appeal No. 10972 of 2013). On 11th December, 2013, the Hon'ble Supreme Court, in a regressive decision, has upheld the validity of Section 377, IPC that criminalises all penile non-vaginal sexual acts between consenting adults and has set aside the judgment of Delhi High Court of 2009 that had decriminalized adult consensual sexual acts in private. Represented by Lawyers Collective, the Petition argues that there are a number of grave and manifest errors of law and wrong application of law in the impugned judgment that need to be corrected under review by this Hon'ble Court. The judgment is contrary to the grain of Hon'ble Supreme Court's own jurisprudence on advancement of fundamental rights and freedoms of all persons, especially those who face marginalisation in society. It completely dismisses the foreign jurisprudence from all over the world and international human rights law on sexual orientation and gender identity. Reliance on the principles of judicial restraint and Parliament's prerogative to change laws is misplaced, when the law has been challenged for violation of fundamental rights of individuals, as is being done in the present case. Seeking an interim stay on the operation of the judgment, the petition notes that it has caused immense prejudice to all adult persons who engage in consensual sex, particularly those from the Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual and Transgender community, who suddenly have been put at risk of prosecution under criminal law. In the last four years, many persons from the LGBT community have become open about their sexual identity and disclosed their intimate relationships on the basis of the High Court judgment decriminalising the same. The Petition further states that since it raises significant issues of constitutional import of substantial public interest and far reaching public importance, an oral hearing ought to be given by the Hon'ble Supreme Court.]]>
The Naz Foundation (India) Trust, the original petitioner in the constitutional challenge to Section 377, IPC, has filed a petition seeking review of the judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Suresh Kumar Koushal v. Naz Foundation (India) Trust (Civil Appeal No. 10972 of 2013). On 11th December, 2013, the Hon'ble Supreme Court, in a regressive decision, has upheld the validity of Section 377, IPC that criminalises all penile non-vaginal sexual acts between consenting adults and has set aside the judgment of Delhi High Court of 2009 that had decriminalized adult consensual sexual acts in private. Represented by Lawyers Collective, the Petition argues that there are a number of grave and manifest errors of law and wrong application of law in the impugned judgment that need to be corrected under review by this Hon'ble Court. The judgment is contrary to the grain of Hon'ble Supreme Court's own jurisprudence on advancement of fundamental rights and freedoms of all persons, especially those who face marginalisation in society. It completely dismisses the foreign jurisprudence from all over the world and international human rights law on sexual orientation and gender identity. Reliance on the principles of judicial restraint and Parliament's prerogative to change laws is misplaced, when the law has been challenged for violation of fundamental rights of individuals, as is being done in the present case. Seeking an interim stay on the operation of the judgment, the petition notes that it has caused immense prejudice to all adult persons who engage in consensual sex, particularly those from the Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual and Transgender community, who suddenly have been put at risk of prosecution under criminal law. In the last four years, many persons from the LGBT community have become open about their sexual identity and disclosed their intimate relationships on the basis of the High Court judgment decriminalising the same. The Petition further states that since it raises significant issues of constitutional import of substantial public interest and far reaching public importance, an oral hearing ought to be given by the Hon'ble Supreme Court.]]> Fri, 07 Mar 2014 03:35:27 GMT /slideshow/the-naz-foundation-case-section-377-interlinking-and-hyperlinking/32027491 utkarshk02@slideshare.net(utkarshk02) THE NAZ FOUNDATION CASE (Section 377) - Interlinking and Hyperlinking utkarshk02 The Naz Foundation (India) Trust, the original petitioner in the constitutional challenge to Section 377, IPC, has filed a petition seeking review of the judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Suresh Kumar Koushal v. Naz Foundation (India) Trust (Civil Appeal No. 10972 of 2013). On 11th December, 2013, the Hon'ble Supreme Court, in a regressive decision, has upheld the validity of Section 377, IPC that criminalises all penile non-vaginal sexual acts between consenting adults and has set aside the judgment of Delhi High Court of 2009 that had decriminalized adult consensual sexual acts in private. Represented by Lawyers Collective, the Petition argues that there are a number of grave and manifest errors of law and wrong application of law in the impugned judgment that need to be corrected under review by this Hon'ble Court. The judgment is contrary to the grain of Hon'ble Supreme Court's own jurisprudence on advancement of fundamental rights and freedoms of all persons, especially those who face marginalisation in society. It completely dismisses the foreign jurisprudence from all over the world and international human rights law on sexual orientation and gender identity. Reliance on the principles of judicial restraint and Parliament's prerogative to change laws is misplaced, when the law has been challenged for violation of fundamental rights of individuals, as is being done in the present case. Seeking an interim stay on the operation of the judgment, the petition notes that it has caused immense prejudice to all adult persons who engage in consensual sex, particularly those from the Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual and Transgender community, who suddenly have been put at risk of prosecution under criminal law. In the last four years, many persons from the LGBT community have become open about their sexual identity and disclosed their intimate relationships on the basis of the High Court judgment decriminalising the same. The Petition further states that since it raises significant issues of constitutional import of substantial public interest and far reaching public importance, an oral hearing ought to be given by the Hon'ble Supreme Court. <img style="border:1px solid #C3E6D8;float:right;" alt="" src="https://cdn.slidesharecdn.com/ss_thumbnails/thenazfoundationcasesection377interlinkingandhyperlinking-140307033527-phpapp01-thumbnail.jpg?width=120&height=120&fit=bounds" /> The Naz Foundation (India) Trust, the original petitioner in the constitutional challenge to Section 377, IPC, has filed a petition seeking review of the judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Suresh Kumar Koushal v. Naz Foundation (India) Trust (Civil Appeal No. 10972 of 2013). On 11th December, 2013, the Hon'ble Supreme Court, in a regressive decision, has upheld the validity of Section 377, IPC that criminalises all penile non-vaginal sexual acts between consenting adults and has set aside the judgment of Delhi High Court of 2009 that had decriminalized adult consensual sexual acts in private. Represented by Lawyers Collective, the Petition argues that there are a number of grave and manifest errors of law and wrong application of law in the impugned judgment that need to be corrected under review by this Hon'ble Court. The judgment is contrary to the grain of Hon'ble Supreme Court's own jurisprudence on advancement of fundamental rights and freedoms of all persons, especially those who face marginalisation in society. It completely dismisses the foreign jurisprudence from all over the world and international human rights law on sexual orientation and gender identity. Reliance on the principles of judicial restraint and Parliament's prerogative to change laws is misplaced, when the law has been challenged for violation of fundamental rights of individuals, as is being done in the present case. Seeking an interim stay on the operation of the judgment, the petition notes that it has caused immense prejudice to all adult persons who engage in consensual sex, particularly those from the Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual and Transgender community, who suddenly have been put at risk of prosecution under criminal law. In the last four years, many persons from the LGBT community have become open about their sexual identity and disclosed their intimate relationships on the basis of the High Court judgment decriminalising the same. The Petition further states that since it raises significant issues of constitutional import of substantial public interest and far reaching public importance, an oral hearing ought to be given by the Hon'ble Supreme Court.

THE NAZ FOUNDATION CASE (Section 377) - Interlinking and Hyperlinking from Utkarsh Kumar

]]> 8173 17 https://cdn.slidesharecdn.com/ss_thumbnails/thenazfoundationcasesection377interlinkingandhyperlinking-140307033527-phpapp01-thumbnail.jpg?width=120&height=120&fit=bounds presentation Black http://activitystrea.ms/schema/1.0/post

http://activitystrea.ms/schema/1.0/posted

0 Doctors and their criminal liability /slideshow/doctors-and-their-criminal-liability/31083707 doctorsandtheircriminalliability-140211095035-phpapp01
]]>
]]> Tue, 11 Feb 2014 09:50:35 GMT /slideshow/doctors-and-their-criminal-liability/31083707 utkarshk02@slideshare.net(utkarshk02) Doctors and their criminal liability utkarshk02 <img style="border:1px solid #C3E6D8;float:right;" alt="" src="https://cdn.slidesharecdn.com/ss_thumbnails/doctorsandtheircriminalliability-140211095035-phpapp01-thumbnail.jpg?width=120&height=120&fit=bounds" />

Doctors and their criminal liability from Utkarsh Kumar

]]> 9288 9 https://cdn.slidesharecdn.com/ss_thumbnails/doctorsandtheircriminalliability-140211095035-phpapp01-thumbnail.jpg?width=120&height=120&fit=bounds presentation Black http://activitystrea.ms/schema/1.0/post

http://activitystrea.ms/schema/1.0/posted

0 https://cdn.slidesharecdn.com/profile-photo-utkarshk02-48x48.jpg?cb=1576838476 https://cdn.slidesharecdn.com/ss_thumbnails/sale-150307105711-conversion-gate01-thumbnail.jpg?width=320&height=320&fit=bounds slideshow/sale-as-a-mode-of-transfer-sections-54-to-57-of-the-transfer-of-property-act-1882/45554045 SALE AS A MODE OF TRAN... https://cdn.slidesharecdn.com/ss_thumbnails/lchandrakumar-150307100723-conversion-gate01-thumbnail.jpg?width=320&height=320&fit=bounds utkarshk02/l-chandra-kumar-vs-uoi-air-1997-sc-1125-irac L. Chandra Kumar v/s U... https://cdn.slidesharecdn.com/ss_thumbnails/introduction-legalresoning-research-150307100059-conversion-gate01-thumbnail.jpg?width=320&height=320&fit=bounds slideshow/anticorruption-laws-are-not-sufficient-and-effective-to-curb-corruption-in-india-an-empirical-research/45552833 Anti-corruption laws a...