�ݺ�ߣshows by User: vivekxxx

�ݺ�ߣshows by User: vivekxxx / http://www.slideshare.net/images/logo.gif �ݺ�ߣshows by User: vivekxxx / Sun, 12 Jun 2016 06:45:38 GMT �ݺ�ߣShare feed for �ݺ�ߣshows by User: vivekxxx Breeding for aluminium tolerance /slideshow/breeding-for-aluminium-tolerance/62971910 breedingforaluminiumtolerance-160612064538
breeding for Al tolerance in crop plants]]>
breeding for Al tolerance in crop plants]]> Sun, 12 Jun 2016 06:45:38 GMT /slideshow/breeding-for-aluminium-tolerance/62971910 vivekxxx@slideshare.net(vivekxxx) Breeding for aluminium tolerance vivekxxx breeding for Al tolerance in crop plants <img style="border:1px solid #C3E6D8;float:right;" alt="" src="https://cdn.slidesharecdn.com/ss_thumbnails/breedingforaluminiumtolerance-160612064538-thumbnail.jpg?width=120&height=120&fit=bounds" /><br> breeding for Al tolerance in crop plants

Breeding for aluminium tolerance from Vivek Singh

]]> 1224 7 https://cdn.slidesharecdn.com/ss_thumbnails/breedingforaluminiumtolerance-160612064538-thumbnail.jpg?width=120&height=120&fit=bounds presentation Black http://activitystrea.ms/schema/1.0/post

http://activitystrea.ms/schema/1.0/posted

0 Cisgenics for crop improvement /slideshow/cisgenics-for-crop-improvement/55859841 cisgenicsforcropimprovement-151206050912-lva1-app6892
The use of the term cisgenesis is an attempt to distinguish GM plants or other organisms produced in this way from transgenics that is GM plants that contain DNA from unrelated organisms. Schouten et al. (2006) introduced the term cisgenesis and defined cisgenesis as the modification in the genetic background of a recipient plant by a naturally derived gene from a cross compatible species including its introns and its native promoter and terminator flanked in the normal sense orientation. Since cisgenes shared a common gene pool available for traditional breeding the final cisgenic plant should be devoid of any kind of foreign DNA viz., selection markers and vector- backbone sequences. Sometimes the word cisgenesis is also referred to as Agrobacterium-mediated gene transfer from a sexually compatible plant where only the T-DNA borders may be present in the recipient organism after transformation (EFSA, 2012). The cisgenesis precludes linkage drag, and hence, prevents hazards from unidentified hitch hiking genes (Schouten, and Jacobsen, 2008). Compared to transgenesis, one of the disadvantages shared by cisgenesis is that characters outside the sexually compatible gene pool cannot be introduced. Furthermore, development of cisgenic crops involves extraordinary proficiency and time compared to transgenic crops. Therefore, the required genes or fragments of genes may not be readily accessible but have to be isolated from the sexually compatible gene pool (Holme et al., 2013). On 16 February 2012, European Food Safety Authority (EFSA, 2012) reported the detail study concerning the safety aspects of cisgenic plants and validated that cisgenic plants are secure to be used in terms of environment, food and feed, similar to the traditionally bred plants. However, the present GMO regulation keeps the cisgenic micro-organisms out from its supervision. The first scientific statement of bringing forth a true plant obtained by cisgenic approach was reported in apple through the insertion of the internal scab resistance gene HcrVf2 influenced by their own regulatory genes into the cultivar Gala, a scab susceptible cultivar (Vanblaere et al., 2011). Barley with improved phytase activity was produced successfully by Holme et al. 2011, through cisgenic approach. Late blight resistant potatoes have developed by cisgene stacking of R- gene (jo et al., 2014).]]>
The use of the term cisgenesis is an attempt to distinguish GM plants or other organisms produced in this way from transgenics that is GM plants that contain DNA from unrelated organisms. Schouten et al. (2006) introduced the term cisgenesis and defined cisgenesis as the modification in the genetic background of a recipient plant by a naturally derived gene from a cross compatible species including its introns and its native promoter and terminator flanked in the normal sense orientation. Since cisgenes shared a common gene pool available for traditional breeding the final cisgenic plant should be devoid of any kind of foreign DNA viz., selection markers and vector- backbone sequences. Sometimes the word cisgenesis is also referred to as Agrobacterium-mediated gene transfer from a sexually compatible plant where only the T-DNA borders may be present in the recipient organism after transformation (EFSA, 2012). The cisgenesis precludes linkage drag, and hence, prevents hazards from unidentified hitch hiking genes (Schouten, and Jacobsen, 2008). Compared to transgenesis, one of the disadvantages shared by cisgenesis is that characters outside the sexually compatible gene pool cannot be introduced. Furthermore, development of cisgenic crops involves extraordinary proficiency and time compared to transgenic crops. Therefore, the required genes or fragments of genes may not be readily accessible but have to be isolated from the sexually compatible gene pool (Holme et al., 2013). On 16 February 2012, European Food Safety Authority (EFSA, 2012) reported the detail study concerning the safety aspects of cisgenic plants and validated that cisgenic plants are secure to be used in terms of environment, food and feed, similar to the traditionally bred plants. However, the present GMO regulation keeps the cisgenic micro-organisms out from its supervision. The first scientific statement of bringing forth a true plant obtained by cisgenic approach was reported in apple through the insertion of the internal scab resistance gene HcrVf2 influenced by their own regulatory genes into the cultivar Gala, a scab susceptible cultivar (Vanblaere et al., 2011). Barley with improved phytase activity was produced successfully by Holme et al. 2011, through cisgenic approach. Late blight resistant potatoes have developed by cisgene stacking of R- gene (jo et al., 2014).]]> Sun, 06 Dec 2015 05:09:12 GMT /slideshow/cisgenics-for-crop-improvement/55859841 vivekxxx@slideshare.net(vivekxxx) Cisgenics for crop improvement vivekxxx The use of the term cisgenesis is an attempt to distinguish GM plants or other organisms produced in this way from transgenics that is GM plants that contain DNA from unrelated organisms. Schouten et al. (2006) introduced the term cisgenesis and defined cisgenesis as the modification in the genetic background of a recipient plant by a naturally derived gene from a cross compatible species including its introns and its native promoter and terminator flanked in the normal sense orientation. Since cisgenes shared a common gene pool available for traditional breeding the final cisgenic plant should be devoid of any kind of foreign DNA viz., selection markers and vector- backbone sequences. Sometimes the word cisgenesis is also referred to as Agrobacterium-mediated gene transfer from a sexually compatible plant where only the T-DNA borders may be present in the recipient organism after transformation (EFSA, 2012). The cisgenesis precludes linkage drag, and hence, prevents hazards from unidentified hitch hiking genes (Schouten, and Jacobsen, 2008). Compared to transgenesis, one of the disadvantages shared by cisgenesis is that characters outside the sexually compatible gene pool cannot be introduced. Furthermore, development of cisgenic crops involves extraordinary proficiency and time compared to transgenic crops. Therefore, the required genes or fragments of genes may not be readily accessible but have to be isolated from the sexually compatible gene pool (Holme et al., 2013). On 16 February 2012, European Food Safety Authority (EFSA, 2012) reported the detail study concerning the safety aspects of cisgenic plants and validated that cisgenic plants are secure to be used in terms of environment, food and feed, similar to the traditionally bred plants. However, the present GMO regulation keeps the cisgenic micro-organisms out from its supervision. The first scientific statement of bringing forth a true plant obtained by cisgenic approach was reported in apple through the insertion of the internal scab resistance gene HcrVf2 influenced by their own regulatory genes into the cultivar Gala, a scab susceptible cultivar (Vanblaere et al., 2011). Barley with improved phytase activity was produced successfully by Holme et al. 2011, through cisgenic approach. Late blight resistant potatoes have developed by cisgene stacking of R- gene (jo et al., 2014). <img style="border:1px solid #C3E6D8;float:right;" alt="" src="https://cdn.slidesharecdn.com/ss_thumbnails/cisgenicsforcropimprovement-151206050912-lva1-app6892-thumbnail.jpg?width=120&height=120&fit=bounds" /><br> The use of the term cisgenesis is an attempt to distinguish GM plants or other organisms produced in this way from transgenics that is GM plants that contain DNA from unrelated organisms. Schouten et al. (2006) introduced the term cisgenesis and defined cisgenesis as the modification in the genetic background of a recipient plant by a naturally derived gene from a cross compatible species including its introns and its native promoter and terminator flanked in the normal sense orientation. Since cisgenes shared a common gene pool available for traditional breeding the final cisgenic plant should be devoid of any kind of foreign DNA viz., selection markers and vector- backbone sequences. Sometimes the word cisgenesis is also referred to as Agrobacterium-mediated gene transfer from a sexually compatible plant where only the T-DNA borders may be present in the recipient organism after transformation (EFSA, 2012). The cisgenesis precludes linkage drag, and hence, prevents hazards from unidentified hitch hiking genes (Schouten, and Jacobsen, 2008). Compared to transgenesis, one of the disadvantages shared by cisgenesis is that characters outside the sexually compatible gene pool cannot be introduced. Furthermore, development of cisgenic crops involves extraordinary proficiency and time compared to transgenic crops. Therefore, the required genes or fragments of genes may not be readily accessible but have to be isolated from the sexually compatible gene pool (Holme et al., 2013). On 16 February 2012, European Food Safety Authority (EFSA, 2012) reported the detail study concerning the safety aspects of cisgenic plants and validated that cisgenic plants are secure to be used in terms of environment, food and feed, similar to the traditionally bred plants. However, the present GMO regulation keeps the cisgenic micro-organisms out from its supervision. The first scientific statement of bringing forth a true plant obtained by cisgenic approach was reported in apple through the insertion of the internal scab resistance gene HcrVf2 influenced by their own regulatory genes into the cultivar Gala, a scab susceptible cultivar (Vanblaere et al., 2011). Barley with improved phytase activity was produced successfully by Holme et al. 2011, through cisgenic approach. Late blight resistant potatoes have developed by cisgene stacking of R- gene (jo et al., 2014).

Cisgenics for crop improvement from Vivek Singh

]]> 3724 7 https://cdn.slidesharecdn.com/ss_thumbnails/cisgenicsforcropimprovement-151206050912-lva1-app6892-thumbnail.jpg?width=120&height=120&fit=bounds presentation 000000 http://activitystrea.ms/schema/1.0/post

http://activitystrea.ms/schema/1.0/posted

0 https://cdn.slidesharecdn.com/profile-photo-vivekxxx-48x48.jpg?cb=1735640908 https://cdn.slidesharecdn.com/ss_thumbnails/breedingforaluminiumtolerance-160612064538-thumbnail.jpg?width=320&height=320&fit=bounds slideshow/breeding-for-aluminium-tolerance/62971910 Breeding for aluminium... https://cdn.slidesharecdn.com/ss_thumbnails/cisgenicsforcropimprovement-151206050912-lva1-app6892-thumbnail.jpg?width=320&height=320&fit=bounds slideshow/cisgenics-for-crop-improvement/55859841 Cisgenics for crop im...