際際滷

際際滷Share a Scribd company logo
Challenge  to move from a proprietary archival management system used by three organisations, to one which was more open and with greater
longevity.
Government archives in Australia use some form of the Australian Series registration system, which uses functional series as the main descriptive
entity, rather than fonds.
Systems designed outside of Australia use fonds.
Other standards supported by AtoM
RAD EAD Dublin Core MODS /MARC
Why NOT the Australian Series Registration System?
Conceptually 
Disrupting description: implementing the Australian Series system in AccesstoMemory (AtoM)
Lets talk Strine
ISAD(G), which AtoM uses as the template for all levels of archival description, requires that the highest level of description should be a fonds
description. US and Canadian description standards concentrate on individual letters and documents  items. Fonds and items, as individual objects,
are coded into AtoM. Australian and Western Australian parlance is slightly different. In addition to changing the highest level of description from fonds
to series, we needed:
 Consignment  list of items transferred as part of an accession in accordance with an approved disposal authority or the SROs collection
policy. Consignments may contain items from one or more series of records.
 Item - A discrete unit in a recordkeeping system or, in the archival context, within a series, such as a document or file, that is treated
as a unit for control and retrieval. (NAA, 2013)
 Piece  component of an item, such as a photograph in an album or letter on a file. (cf http://www.ciscra.org/mat/termdb/term/213)
To change that, we invented a new language  en_AU.
Relationships matter
The other thing that Series Registration does that the ICA standards do not, is set up relationships between series as well as between archival
authorities. AtoM has the four relationship types allowed for in ISAAR-CPF in the taxonomies: associative, hierarchical, temporal and relational. We
modified these types to include the relationship types identified in series, and linked them to actors and descriptions. Not only that, but we made sure
that they were reciprocal. We also linked event types across both types of description. This provides for a much richer contextual description.
Yours fondsly?
As the result of this work, we believe that we have a different way of recognising and describing fonds; one that is based on the series that we hold in
the collection, as well as those we know are being created. We can take a snap shot in time to see who was responsible for what, when.
References Australian Society of Archivists (2005) Describing archives in context; International Council on Archives (2008) ISAAR- CPF, ISAD(G), ISDF
Acknowledgements Michele Keogh, Meg Travers  SROWA. Piers Higgs, Kehan Harman, Anthony Jones, Ben New  Gaia Resources.
Banksia coccinea  detail from AU WA S3608- cons7188 07
The principles of the Australian Series system description requires at least two descriptive entities:
1 Context Control, which is achieved by the identification and registration of records creating and other ambient entities and the
documentation of the administrative and biographical histories of those entities, their functional responsibilities and their relationships
with each other and with the recordkeeping systems they maintain(ed).
2 Records Control, which is achieved by the identification, registration and documentation of record series and/or the items that make up
those series.
AccesstoMemory
. this should be easy
Series System
Look Ma, no fonds
The Australian Series system was developed in the late 1960s and early 1970s by Peter Scott and Ian McLean of the Australian Commonwealth archives.
They recognised that the complexities of the Australian government system, with rapidly changing portfolios and ministries, meant that a fonds based
approach would mean multiple entries, often for records which were created to meet the same administrative and functional purposes. By focusing on the
records and recognising continuity by function, they could identify multiple creating and controlling entities for each series. Series description relies on
contextual information about the creator(s), thick description as to scope and content of the series, and thin description at item level.
AtoM is designed around the ICAs internationally approved descriptive standards ISAD (G), ISAAR, ISDF, and ISDIAH, but appeared flexible enough to
accommodate practices based on local descriptive standards, such as the Australian series system used by the State Records Office of WA

More Related Content

Disrupting description canada3

  • 1. Challenge to move from a proprietary archival management system used by three organisations, to one which was more open and with greater longevity. Government archives in Australia use some form of the Australian Series registration system, which uses functional series as the main descriptive entity, rather than fonds. Systems designed outside of Australia use fonds. Other standards supported by AtoM RAD EAD Dublin Core MODS /MARC Why NOT the Australian Series Registration System? Conceptually Disrupting description: implementing the Australian Series system in AccesstoMemory (AtoM) Lets talk Strine ISAD(G), which AtoM uses as the template for all levels of archival description, requires that the highest level of description should be a fonds description. US and Canadian description standards concentrate on individual letters and documents items. Fonds and items, as individual objects, are coded into AtoM. Australian and Western Australian parlance is slightly different. In addition to changing the highest level of description from fonds to series, we needed: Consignment list of items transferred as part of an accession in accordance with an approved disposal authority or the SROs collection policy. Consignments may contain items from one or more series of records. Item - A discrete unit in a recordkeeping system or, in the archival context, within a series, such as a document or file, that is treated as a unit for control and retrieval. (NAA, 2013) Piece component of an item, such as a photograph in an album or letter on a file. (cf http://www.ciscra.org/mat/termdb/term/213) To change that, we invented a new language en_AU. Relationships matter The other thing that Series Registration does that the ICA standards do not, is set up relationships between series as well as between archival authorities. AtoM has the four relationship types allowed for in ISAAR-CPF in the taxonomies: associative, hierarchical, temporal and relational. We modified these types to include the relationship types identified in series, and linked them to actors and descriptions. Not only that, but we made sure that they were reciprocal. We also linked event types across both types of description. This provides for a much richer contextual description. Yours fondsly? As the result of this work, we believe that we have a different way of recognising and describing fonds; one that is based on the series that we hold in the collection, as well as those we know are being created. We can take a snap shot in time to see who was responsible for what, when. References Australian Society of Archivists (2005) Describing archives in context; International Council on Archives (2008) ISAAR- CPF, ISAD(G), ISDF Acknowledgements Michele Keogh, Meg Travers SROWA. Piers Higgs, Kehan Harman, Anthony Jones, Ben New Gaia Resources. Banksia coccinea detail from AU WA S3608- cons7188 07 The principles of the Australian Series system description requires at least two descriptive entities: 1 Context Control, which is achieved by the identification and registration of records creating and other ambient entities and the documentation of the administrative and biographical histories of those entities, their functional responsibilities and their relationships with each other and with the recordkeeping systems they maintain(ed). 2 Records Control, which is achieved by the identification, registration and documentation of record series and/or the items that make up those series. AccesstoMemory . this should be easy Series System Look Ma, no fonds The Australian Series system was developed in the late 1960s and early 1970s by Peter Scott and Ian McLean of the Australian Commonwealth archives. They recognised that the complexities of the Australian government system, with rapidly changing portfolios and ministries, meant that a fonds based approach would mean multiple entries, often for records which were created to meet the same administrative and functional purposes. By focusing on the records and recognising continuity by function, they could identify multiple creating and controlling entities for each series. Series description relies on contextual information about the creator(s), thick description as to scope and content of the series, and thin description at item level. AtoM is designed around the ICAs internationally approved descriptive standards ISAD (G), ISAAR, ISDF, and ISDIAH, but appeared flexible enough to accommodate practices based on local descriptive standards, such as the Australian series system used by the State Records Office of WA