際際滷

際際滷Share a Scribd company logo
100 Paseo de San Antonio, San Jose, CA 95113  www.hsr.ca.gov
Northern California Regional Office
October 9, 2019
Ms. Adina Levin
Friends of Caltrain
3921 E Bayshore Rd
Palo Alto, CA 94303
Re: Preferred Alternative for the San Francisco to San Jose Project Section
Dear Adina:
Thank you for taking the time to provide feedback on the California High-Speed
Rail Authority (Authority) Preferred Alternative for the San Francisco to San Jose
Project Section. Friends of Caltrain has been a valuable member of our
Community Working Groups and we look forward to continuing to work with
members of your organization.
In your letter, you raised concerns about the relationship between the Authoritys
proposed project that is undergoing environmental review and other planning
efforts including the Caltrain Business Plan and the Diridon Integrated Station
Concept Plan.
The Authority has been working collaboratively with Caltrain to plan, evaluate,
and develop the blended system since 2012. Caltrain in 2015 completed
environmental clearance for the Peninsula Corridor Electrification Project
(PCEP). After completion of the PCEP environmental clearance, the agencies
worked together to develop and assess the infrastructure needed to add high-
speed rail service to the corridor in addition to those previously-evaluated and
adopted plans by Caltrain. That work (along with substantial input from other
stakeholders) resulted in the two alternatives under study in the San Francisco to
San Jose project section.
Our efforts have taken place concurrently with Caltrains development of a
business plan to lay out a long-range vision for the corridor and the Diridon
Integrated Station Concept Plan (both of which are ongoing). These efforts are
important planning work for the future and are still evolving meaningfully. The
Authoritys environmental documents will take both of these efforts into account
but they will both require separate environmental clearance at the time that they
are further developed, finite and stable.
The Authoritys efforts will not preclude either the Caltrain Business Plan or the
Diridon Integrated Station Concept Plan from moving forward. Additionally, we
Ms. Adina Levine
October 7, 2019
Page 2
plan to stay actively engaged and to work collaboratively with Caltrain and our other
partners on the development and long-term plans for the rail corridor between San
Francisco, San Jose, and Gilroy. I am attaching Caltrains letter to the Authority that lays
out some of those future collaborative steps while also concurring with the Authoritys
identification of the Preferred Alternatives in Northern California.
As all of these efforts continue to advance, we look forward to an open and frequent
dialogue with Friends of Caltrain.
Sincerely,
Boris Lipkin
Northern California Regional Director

More Related Content

Fj pa-friendsof caltrain-levin-responseltr-10-09-2019 (1) (1)

  • 1. 100 Paseo de San Antonio, San Jose, CA 95113 www.hsr.ca.gov Northern California Regional Office October 9, 2019 Ms. Adina Levin Friends of Caltrain 3921 E Bayshore Rd Palo Alto, CA 94303 Re: Preferred Alternative for the San Francisco to San Jose Project Section Dear Adina: Thank you for taking the time to provide feedback on the California High-Speed Rail Authority (Authority) Preferred Alternative for the San Francisco to San Jose Project Section. Friends of Caltrain has been a valuable member of our Community Working Groups and we look forward to continuing to work with members of your organization. In your letter, you raised concerns about the relationship between the Authoritys proposed project that is undergoing environmental review and other planning efforts including the Caltrain Business Plan and the Diridon Integrated Station Concept Plan. The Authority has been working collaboratively with Caltrain to plan, evaluate, and develop the blended system since 2012. Caltrain in 2015 completed environmental clearance for the Peninsula Corridor Electrification Project (PCEP). After completion of the PCEP environmental clearance, the agencies worked together to develop and assess the infrastructure needed to add high- speed rail service to the corridor in addition to those previously-evaluated and adopted plans by Caltrain. That work (along with substantial input from other stakeholders) resulted in the two alternatives under study in the San Francisco to San Jose project section. Our efforts have taken place concurrently with Caltrains development of a business plan to lay out a long-range vision for the corridor and the Diridon Integrated Station Concept Plan (both of which are ongoing). These efforts are important planning work for the future and are still evolving meaningfully. The Authoritys environmental documents will take both of these efforts into account but they will both require separate environmental clearance at the time that they are further developed, finite and stable. The Authoritys efforts will not preclude either the Caltrain Business Plan or the Diridon Integrated Station Concept Plan from moving forward. Additionally, we
  • 2. Ms. Adina Levine October 7, 2019 Page 2 plan to stay actively engaged and to work collaboratively with Caltrain and our other partners on the development and long-term plans for the rail corridor between San Francisco, San Jose, and Gilroy. I am attaching Caltrains letter to the Authority that lays out some of those future collaborative steps while also concurring with the Authoritys identification of the Preferred Alternatives in Northern California. As all of these efforts continue to advance, we look forward to an open and frequent dialogue with Friends of Caltrain. Sincerely, Boris Lipkin Northern California Regional Director