The document discusses crisis management strategies during a time of crisis in Ukraine in 2014. It describes shifting from a state of "fog fear" due to anxiety over the crisis, to "tent time" of being together calmly. It also discusses developing contingency plans for various "what if" scenarios related to the crisis. The document advocates keeping employees well-informed with straight talk rather than sugar-coated messages. It also suggests giving team members as much responsibility as possible to increase leadership. Finally, it outlines a framework for crisis leadership that combines risk management and crisis management approaches.
3. We learned
How to shift from “fog fear”
To “tent time”
Pervasive anxiety, fear for families & lives = Fog Fear
Good times together, calm and close = Tent Time
4. We became
A ”what-if”
Machine
What if open
war in Eastern
Ukraine
starts?
What if our
employees are
mobilized
into the army?
What if our
factory close to
the war zone
get taken?
How can we
safely transfer
our factory
workers elsewhere?
How can we persuade
the government to
create a buffer tax
stamp stock?
Develop contingency scenarios constantly:
6. Gave the team
As much responsibility
As possible
Different people from team came to lead.
Appreciated the diversity.
Increased responsibility, more leadership in return.
8. Risk and Crisis
Risk Management
Proactive
Foreseen events
Focus on processes
Purpose: Identify risks &
mitigate them
Specialized dept. in big corps
BoD responsibility
Crisis Management
Reactive
Unforeseen events
Focus on people & assets
Purpose: Save the game,
damage control
Service on demand
BoD high attention
Crisis Leadership
Continuous (Proactive & reactive)
Combines internal risks, external
threats and high impact events
Focus on talent, teams,
processes, purpose & leadership
Doesn't exist today
BoD future responsibility