Implementing directives
0 likes379 views
The document discusses how the European Union issues directives that are binding on member states. While directives are binding, they must be implemented through each member state's own laws within a time limit set by the European Commission. The usual method for implementing directives in the UK is through delegated legislation, such as the Unfair Terms in Consumer Contracts Regulations which were secondary legislation introduced to implement a European Directive on consumer contracts.
1 of 3
Recommended
Theft: Appropriation and consent
Theft: Appropriation and consentKirsty Allison
Ìý
The document discusses several court cases related to the definition of theft and appropriation. It notes that in some cases such as Lawrence (1971), taking property with consent was still considered appropriation. However, in other cases such as Fritschy (1985) and Gallasso (1993), taking property with the owner's permission did not amount to appropriation in the legal sense of theft. The document analyzes how the legal concept of appropriation has been applied inconsistently depending on the specific case and jurisdiction.S 47 OAPA (ABH)
S 47 OAPA (ABH)Kirsty Allison
Ìý
Actual bodily harm means any hurt, injury, or psychiatric harm that interferes with health or comfort, even if minor or momentary. The actus reus can be caused directly or indirectly, and the mens rea is either intention or subjective recklessness to cause such harm.Ways of Checking Whether It is worth Litigating
Ways of Checking Whether It is worth LitigatingKirsty Allison
Ìý
This document outlines 6 ways to check if litigation is worth pursuing against a company or individual. They include checking company records and ownership with Companies House, using credit checking services, searching for county court judgments, obtaining information from the client, searching land registry to see if premises are owned, and making local or personal inquiries.Incorporating terms
Incorporating termsKirsty Allison
Ìý
Terms can be incorporated through 1) a signed document, 2) adequate notice which considers timing, type and nature of the document, 3) a consistent course of dealings as shown in Hollier v Rambler Motors, or 4) the common intention and understanding of the parties such as in British Crane Hire Corporation Ltd. v Ipswich Plant Hire Ltd. The document discusses four ways that terms can become legally binding: through a signed document, adequate notice of terms in the document, a consistent course of dealings between the parties, or a common understanding between the parties.Delegated Legislation: Procedural Ultra Vires
Delegated Legislation: Procedural Ultra ViresKirsty Allison
Ìý
Procedural ultra vires occurs when a public authority exceeds its powers by failing to follow mandatory procedural requirements in its enabling act. Case law has established that statutory instruments will be invalidated if mandatory consultation or publication requirements are not followed, but not if the procedures are only directory. For example, in R v Secretary of State for Education and Employment, a statutory instrument setting teacher pay conditions was ruled ultra vires for failing to follow the powers granted by the enabling act.Attempts: Development of Mens Rea
Attempts: Development of Mens ReaKirsty Allison
Ìý
Development of MR in Attempts cases for OCR syllabus
Overall procedure under CPR 1998 (stages 1 8)
Overall procedure under CPR 1998 (stages 1 8)Kirsty Allison
Ìý
This document outlines the 8 stages of the overall procedure under CPR (Civil Procedure Rules), including ADR, issuing a letter before action, issuing proceedings, allocation or directions, pre-trial review, trial, costs, and enforcement.Contract Case law: Offer
Contract Case law: OfferKirsty Allison
Ìý
This document summarizes several contract case law rulings related to offers:
1) R v Clarke and Taylor v Laird established that for an offer to be accepted, the offeree must have knowledge of the offer and intend to accept it at the time of the alleged acceptance.
2) Partridge v Crittenden, P.S.G.B. v Boots Chemists, Fisher v Bell, and Harvey v Facey ruled that shop displays and advertisements are invitations to treat, not offers, which can be revoked before acceptance.
3) Carlill v Carbolic Smoke Ball Co established that advertisements can constitute unilateral offers in exceptional cases.Control of Delegated Legislation
Control of Delegated LegislationKirsty Allison
Ìý
The document discusses control of delegated legislation in the United Kingdom. [1] It recaps that delegated legislation includes statutory instruments and orders in council that have UK-wide effect, as well as local by-laws. [2] Powers are often delegated to ministers through enabling acts of Parliament to make secondary legislation. [3] The document then uses Kenneth Clarke as an example of how a Secretary of State is responsible for making delegated legislation through their department. It outlines some methods used to control delegated legislation, including consultation during the creation of statutory instruments and publication of all delegated legislation.Costs
CostsKirsty Allison
Ìý
The document discusses various aspects of costs in UK civil litigation, including:
- The general rule that costs follow the event, but the court has discretion based on circumstances.
- Reforms introduced by LASPOA 2012, including the qualified one-way costs shifting for personal injury claims, proportionality requirements, costs budgets, fixed costs for certain claims, and provisional detailed assessments.
- The procedures for summary assessment of costs at the end of fast track trials, and detailed assessment of costs in multi-track cases, including points of dispute processes.
- The standard and indemnity bases of assessment and wasted costs orders against lawyers.Financing litigation
Financing litigationKirsty Allison
Ìý
This document discusses various methods for financing civil litigation in England and Wales, including retainers, contingency fees (CFAs), damages-based agreements (DBAs), insurance, qualified one-way costs shifting (QOCS), and public funding. It provides details on reforms introduced by the Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Act 2012, such as success fees and ATE premiums no longer being recoverable from the losing party. CFAs and DBAs are now the main alternatives to traditional retainers, with caps on the percentage of damages that can be claimed. Public funding through legal aid has limited availability and alternative options may include trade union support.English Legal System
English Legal SystemKirsty Allison
Ìý
This document discusses the definition of law according to five academics and classifies law into seven main categories. It defines law as a body of rules fixed and enforced by a sovereign authority according to John Austin, and as a system of rules according to Professor Hart. Law can also be seen as an embodiment of reason (Plato) or a tool of control (Marxist theory). The seven classifications of law covered are domestic, European, international, public, private, civil, and criminal law.European Commission
European CommissionKirsty Allison
Ìý
The European Commission proposes EU legislation, negotiates trade deals with other countries on behalf of the EU, and oversees the EU budget. It is also responsible for ensuring EU laws are properly applied and can refer countries to the European Court of Justice. The Commission consists of one Commissioner from each EU member state who are each responsible for specific policy areas.Treaties and regulations
Treaties and regulationsKirsty Allison
Ìý
This document provides an overview of key EU treaties and cases related to sources of EU law, including:
- The Treaty of Rome (1957) which established the European Economic Community and focused on economic cooperation.
- The Treaty of Amsterdam (1997) which expanded qualified majority voting and gave the Commission a say over justice policy.
- The Treaty of Nice (2000) which reformed EU decision-making and set limits on future enlargement.
- The Treaty of Lisbon (2007) which aimed to streamline EU institutions to function with 27 member states.
Notable cases discussed include Van Duyn v Home Office (1974) and Macarthys Ltd v Smith (1980) which related toStatutory Interpretation: The Mischief Rule
Statutory Interpretation: The Mischief RuleKirsty Allison
Ìý
The document discusses two cases related to the mischief rule:
1) Smith v Hughes (1960): The court applied the mischief rule to hold that prostitutes soliciting from private premises like windows/balconies were within the intended target of the Street Offences Act, even though a literal reading placed their actions in a private place.
2) Corkery v Carpenter (1950): The court applied the mischief rule to hold that a bicycle constitutes a "carriage" under the relevant law, as the aim was to prevent drunk people from being in control of transport on highways.Delegated Legislation: Substantive ultra vires
Delegated Legislation: Substantive ultra viresKirsty Allison
Ìý
The document discusses the concept of substantive ultra vires, which allows courts to intervene when public authorities abuse their powers by creating laws illegally or unreasonably. It provides examples of cases where authorities have overstepped their powers, such as giving a government department more authority than Parliament or forcing people to remove snow when they lacked that authority. Courts can review delegated legislation for unreasonable acts under the concept of substantive ultra vires.Insanity
InsanityKirsty Allison
Ìý
The document discusses a "defect of reason" caused by a disease of the mind which affects a person's ability to reason. It notes that confusion alone is not enough and there needs to be a total inability to reason or know that one's act is wrong. It also states that the internal cause does not have to be a disease of the brain, but anything that affects one's ability to reason or know what they are doing is wrong.Murder
MurderKirsty Allison
Ìý
This document discusses the legal definition and elements of the offense of murder in the UK. It defines murder as an "unlawful killing" with "malice aforethought," which can be expressed as an intention to kill or cause serious harm. It explains the developments around the concept of "oblique intent" and distinguishes between "express malice" and "implied malice." Key court cases such as Moloney, Nedrick, and Woollin are referenced in relation to how foresight of consequences can be used as evidence of intent. The document also briefly mentions the partial defense of provocation and law reforms around the year and a day rule.Juries in the criminal courts
Juries in the criminal courtsKirsty Allison
Ìý
Juries play an important role in criminal cases in Crown Court, where 12 jurors listen to evidence and the judge's summing up before deciding in secret whether the defendant is guilty or not guilty by majority verdict to prevent jury interference.Theft Case Law
Theft Case LawKirsty Allison
Ìý
This document summarizes several theft case laws related to the concept of appropriation:
- Lawrence (1971) established that taking money with consent could still be appropriation.
- Eddy v Niman (1971) found no appropriation when goods were placed in a store's trolley as this was consistent with the owner's rights.
- McPherson (1973) ruled that placing bottles in a bag showed intent to steal, amounting to appropriation.
- Skipp (1975) determined appropriation occurred when goods were loaded and the route changed, not just upon intending to steal.
- R v Morris (1983) found appropriation as soon as price labels were switched. Theft: Appropriation Common Law Development
Theft: Appropriation Common Law DevelopmentKirsty Allison
Ìý
This document discusses the legal development of the concept of appropriation as it relates to theft. It summarizes several key court cases between 1971 and 1993 that helped define when appropriation occurs. The cases established that appropriation can take place before an item is removed from the store if the person's actions are inconsistent with the owner's rights, such as switching price tags or loading goods with the intent to steal them and divert them from their destination. Appropriation requires an act that assumes the rights of ownership over an item.Juries in civil cases
Juries in civil casesKirsty Allison
Ìý
Juries play a role in deciding certain civil cases such as defamation, false imprisonment, and fraud that involve issues of character and reputation. However, judges can refuse juries even in these cases if the evidence is too complicated. Juries are allowed in personal injury cases in exceptional circumstances according to Ward v James, but none have been deemed exceptional since. In civil cases juries have a dual role in deciding liability and assessing damages to be awarded.Robbery Case Names
Robbery Case NamesKirsty Allison
Ìý
This document appears to list legal cases related to robbery from 1976 to 1995. It includes 6 cases: Robinson (1977), Corcoran v Anderton (1980), Dawson and James (1976), Clouden (1987), Hale (1979), and Lockley (1995). The document provides a high-level listing of legal cases but no other context or details about the cases themselves.Automatism
AutomatismKirsty Allison
Ìý
This document discusses the legal defense of automatism, where a defendant's actions are involuntary due to an external uncontrollable factor. For automatism to apply, the act must be due to a spasm, convulsion or other uncontrollable response induced by an external stimulus, such as being stung by bees. Both case law and legal principles discussed in the document require the act to be involuntary and prevent the defendant from forming criminal intent for automatism to be a successful complete defense leading to acquittal.Conditional Fee Agreements
Conditional Fee AgreementsKirsty Allison
Ìý
A conditional fee agreement, also known as a "no win no fee" agreement, allows a representative to only recover costs if a case is successful, while the client pays disbursements and insurance as the case progresses. The representative can also claim a success fee or uplift from the other party if notice is given, and alternatives include private funding or legal expenses insurance.Criminal Procedure: Triable Either Way Offences
Criminal Procedure: Triable Either Way OffencesKirsty Allison
Ìý
The document discusses where an "either way offence" will be heard in court. It explains that a defendant will first enter a plea of guilty or not guilty. If pleading guilty, the case will be heard in Magistrates' Court. If pleading not guilty, the magistrates will determine if the case is suitable for their court or needs to be transferred to Crown Court for trial. The defendant is also given a choice over which court hears the case if magistrates accept jurisdiction.Information/Documentation to Support Personal Injury Claim
Information/Documentation to Support Personal Injury ClaimKirsty Allison
Ìý
Information that can be gathered to support a personal injury claim includes accident reports, health and safety certificates, copies of insurance documentation, witness statements, and records of any involvement from the Health and Safety Executive.Online Learning: Continuous Enhancement and Improvement
Online Learning: Continuous Enhancement and ImprovementKirsty Allison
Ìý
The role of a Programme Lead in the continuous enhancement and improvement of the student experience in an online education setting.Indirect intention
Indirect intentionKirsty Allison
Ìý
This document discusses the legal principles of oblique intent in criminal cases. It outlines several important court cases that have helped define how intent can be established through foreseeability of consequences:
- DPP v Smith established that a person intends the natural and probable consequences of their actions.
- Hyam v DPP found that intent exists when a person foresees a consequence as being highly probable due to their actions.
- More recent cases like Nedrick, Woolin, and Matthews and Alleyne have confirmed that a jury can only find intent if the consequence was virtually certain and the defendant appreciated this, establishing foreseeability of consequences as a rule of evidence for intent.More Related Content
Viewers also liked (20)
Contract Case law: Offer
Contract Case law: OfferKirsty Allison
Ìý
This document summarizes several contract case law rulings related to offers:
1) R v Clarke and Taylor v Laird established that for an offer to be accepted, the offeree must have knowledge of the offer and intend to accept it at the time of the alleged acceptance.
2) Partridge v Crittenden, P.S.G.B. v Boots Chemists, Fisher v Bell, and Harvey v Facey ruled that shop displays and advertisements are invitations to treat, not offers, which can be revoked before acceptance.
3) Carlill v Carbolic Smoke Ball Co established that advertisements can constitute unilateral offers in exceptional cases.Control of Delegated Legislation
Control of Delegated LegislationKirsty Allison
Ìý
The document discusses control of delegated legislation in the United Kingdom. [1] It recaps that delegated legislation includes statutory instruments and orders in council that have UK-wide effect, as well as local by-laws. [2] Powers are often delegated to ministers through enabling acts of Parliament to make secondary legislation. [3] The document then uses Kenneth Clarke as an example of how a Secretary of State is responsible for making delegated legislation through their department. It outlines some methods used to control delegated legislation, including consultation during the creation of statutory instruments and publication of all delegated legislation.Costs
CostsKirsty Allison
Ìý
The document discusses various aspects of costs in UK civil litigation, including:
- The general rule that costs follow the event, but the court has discretion based on circumstances.
- Reforms introduced by LASPOA 2012, including the qualified one-way costs shifting for personal injury claims, proportionality requirements, costs budgets, fixed costs for certain claims, and provisional detailed assessments.
- The procedures for summary assessment of costs at the end of fast track trials, and detailed assessment of costs in multi-track cases, including points of dispute processes.
- The standard and indemnity bases of assessment and wasted costs orders against lawyers.Financing litigation
Financing litigationKirsty Allison
Ìý
This document discusses various methods for financing civil litigation in England and Wales, including retainers, contingency fees (CFAs), damages-based agreements (DBAs), insurance, qualified one-way costs shifting (QOCS), and public funding. It provides details on reforms introduced by the Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Act 2012, such as success fees and ATE premiums no longer being recoverable from the losing party. CFAs and DBAs are now the main alternatives to traditional retainers, with caps on the percentage of damages that can be claimed. Public funding through legal aid has limited availability and alternative options may include trade union support.English Legal System
English Legal SystemKirsty Allison
Ìý
This document discusses the definition of law according to five academics and classifies law into seven main categories. It defines law as a body of rules fixed and enforced by a sovereign authority according to John Austin, and as a system of rules according to Professor Hart. Law can also be seen as an embodiment of reason (Plato) or a tool of control (Marxist theory). The seven classifications of law covered are domestic, European, international, public, private, civil, and criminal law.European Commission
European CommissionKirsty Allison
Ìý
The European Commission proposes EU legislation, negotiates trade deals with other countries on behalf of the EU, and oversees the EU budget. It is also responsible for ensuring EU laws are properly applied and can refer countries to the European Court of Justice. The Commission consists of one Commissioner from each EU member state who are each responsible for specific policy areas.Treaties and regulations
Treaties and regulationsKirsty Allison
Ìý
This document provides an overview of key EU treaties and cases related to sources of EU law, including:
- The Treaty of Rome (1957) which established the European Economic Community and focused on economic cooperation.
- The Treaty of Amsterdam (1997) which expanded qualified majority voting and gave the Commission a say over justice policy.
- The Treaty of Nice (2000) which reformed EU decision-making and set limits on future enlargement.
- The Treaty of Lisbon (2007) which aimed to streamline EU institutions to function with 27 member states.
Notable cases discussed include Van Duyn v Home Office (1974) and Macarthys Ltd v Smith (1980) which related toStatutory Interpretation: The Mischief Rule
Statutory Interpretation: The Mischief RuleKirsty Allison
Ìý
The document discusses two cases related to the mischief rule:
1) Smith v Hughes (1960): The court applied the mischief rule to hold that prostitutes soliciting from private premises like windows/balconies were within the intended target of the Street Offences Act, even though a literal reading placed their actions in a private place.
2) Corkery v Carpenter (1950): The court applied the mischief rule to hold that a bicycle constitutes a "carriage" under the relevant law, as the aim was to prevent drunk people from being in control of transport on highways.Delegated Legislation: Substantive ultra vires
Delegated Legislation: Substantive ultra viresKirsty Allison
Ìý
The document discusses the concept of substantive ultra vires, which allows courts to intervene when public authorities abuse their powers by creating laws illegally or unreasonably. It provides examples of cases where authorities have overstepped their powers, such as giving a government department more authority than Parliament or forcing people to remove snow when they lacked that authority. Courts can review delegated legislation for unreasonable acts under the concept of substantive ultra vires.Insanity
InsanityKirsty Allison
Ìý
The document discusses a "defect of reason" caused by a disease of the mind which affects a person's ability to reason. It notes that confusion alone is not enough and there needs to be a total inability to reason or know that one's act is wrong. It also states that the internal cause does not have to be a disease of the brain, but anything that affects one's ability to reason or know what they are doing is wrong.Murder
MurderKirsty Allison
Ìý
This document discusses the legal definition and elements of the offense of murder in the UK. It defines murder as an "unlawful killing" with "malice aforethought," which can be expressed as an intention to kill or cause serious harm. It explains the developments around the concept of "oblique intent" and distinguishes between "express malice" and "implied malice." Key court cases such as Moloney, Nedrick, and Woollin are referenced in relation to how foresight of consequences can be used as evidence of intent. The document also briefly mentions the partial defense of provocation and law reforms around the year and a day rule.Juries in the criminal courts
Juries in the criminal courtsKirsty Allison
Ìý
Juries play an important role in criminal cases in Crown Court, where 12 jurors listen to evidence and the judge's summing up before deciding in secret whether the defendant is guilty or not guilty by majority verdict to prevent jury interference.Theft Case Law
Theft Case LawKirsty Allison
Ìý
This document summarizes several theft case laws related to the concept of appropriation:
- Lawrence (1971) established that taking money with consent could still be appropriation.
- Eddy v Niman (1971) found no appropriation when goods were placed in a store's trolley as this was consistent with the owner's rights.
- McPherson (1973) ruled that placing bottles in a bag showed intent to steal, amounting to appropriation.
- Skipp (1975) determined appropriation occurred when goods were loaded and the route changed, not just upon intending to steal.
- R v Morris (1983) found appropriation as soon as price labels were switched. Theft: Appropriation Common Law Development
Theft: Appropriation Common Law DevelopmentKirsty Allison
Ìý
This document discusses the legal development of the concept of appropriation as it relates to theft. It summarizes several key court cases between 1971 and 1993 that helped define when appropriation occurs. The cases established that appropriation can take place before an item is removed from the store if the person's actions are inconsistent with the owner's rights, such as switching price tags or loading goods with the intent to steal them and divert them from their destination. Appropriation requires an act that assumes the rights of ownership over an item.Juries in civil cases
Juries in civil casesKirsty Allison
Ìý
Juries play a role in deciding certain civil cases such as defamation, false imprisonment, and fraud that involve issues of character and reputation. However, judges can refuse juries even in these cases if the evidence is too complicated. Juries are allowed in personal injury cases in exceptional circumstances according to Ward v James, but none have been deemed exceptional since. In civil cases juries have a dual role in deciding liability and assessing damages to be awarded.Robbery Case Names
Robbery Case NamesKirsty Allison
Ìý
This document appears to list legal cases related to robbery from 1976 to 1995. It includes 6 cases: Robinson (1977), Corcoran v Anderton (1980), Dawson and James (1976), Clouden (1987), Hale (1979), and Lockley (1995). The document provides a high-level listing of legal cases but no other context or details about the cases themselves.Automatism
AutomatismKirsty Allison
Ìý
This document discusses the legal defense of automatism, where a defendant's actions are involuntary due to an external uncontrollable factor. For automatism to apply, the act must be due to a spasm, convulsion or other uncontrollable response induced by an external stimulus, such as being stung by bees. Both case law and legal principles discussed in the document require the act to be involuntary and prevent the defendant from forming criminal intent for automatism to be a successful complete defense leading to acquittal.Conditional Fee Agreements
Conditional Fee AgreementsKirsty Allison
Ìý
A conditional fee agreement, also known as a "no win no fee" agreement, allows a representative to only recover costs if a case is successful, while the client pays disbursements and insurance as the case progresses. The representative can also claim a success fee or uplift from the other party if notice is given, and alternatives include private funding or legal expenses insurance.Criminal Procedure: Triable Either Way Offences
Criminal Procedure: Triable Either Way OffencesKirsty Allison
Ìý
The document discusses where an "either way offence" will be heard in court. It explains that a defendant will first enter a plea of guilty or not guilty. If pleading guilty, the case will be heard in Magistrates' Court. If pleading not guilty, the magistrates will determine if the case is suitable for their court or needs to be transferred to Crown Court for trial. The defendant is also given a choice over which court hears the case if magistrates accept jurisdiction.Information/Documentation to Support Personal Injury Claim
Information/Documentation to Support Personal Injury ClaimKirsty Allison
Ìý
Information that can be gathered to support a personal injury claim includes accident reports, health and safety certificates, copies of insurance documentation, witness statements, and records of any involvement from the Health and Safety Executive.More from Kirsty Allison (17)
Online Learning: Continuous Enhancement and Improvement
Online Learning: Continuous Enhancement and ImprovementKirsty Allison
Ìý
The role of a Programme Lead in the continuous enhancement and improvement of the student experience in an online education setting.Indirect intention
Indirect intentionKirsty Allison
Ìý
This document discusses the legal principles of oblique intent in criminal cases. It outlines several important court cases that have helped define how intent can be established through foreseeability of consequences:
- DPP v Smith established that a person intends the natural and probable consequences of their actions.
- Hyam v DPP found that intent exists when a person foresees a consequence as being highly probable due to their actions.
- More recent cases like Nedrick, Woolin, and Matthews and Alleyne have confirmed that a jury can only find intent if the consequence was virtually certain and the defendant appreciated this, establishing foreseeability of consequences as a rule of evidence for intent.Actus reus
Actus reusKirsty Allison
Ìý
This document defines and discusses the legal concept of actus reus. It begins by defining actus reus using four sources of authority as the physical act of the crime, an act, a failure to act (omission), or a "state of affairs". It then describes actus reus as generally requiring a positive act, with an exception for cases like R v Larsonneur that involve a state of affairs. Finally, it explains five situations in which an omission may amount to actus reus: 1) when a legal duty exists, such as the duty of parents to care for children; 2) when a duty arises from a relationship; 3) when a duty arises from undertaking someone's care; 4Causation and drugs cases
Causation and drugs casesKirsty Allison
Ìý
This document summarizes several cases related to causation and drugs:
- R v Cato established that administering a noxious substance that causes death is an offence under the 1861 Offences Against the Person Act.
- R v Dalby rejected prosecution for death caused by illegally supplying drugs, as the supply did not directly cause death.
- R v Khan suggested non-action could establish liability if there is a duty to summon medical help in an overdose situation.
- R v Evans upheld conviction for gross negligence manslaughter when the appellant supplied heroin to her sister, recognized the sister's overdose symptoms, but failed to seek medical help, causing her death.Section 25 of the Matrimonial Causes Act 1973: Financial factors
Section 25 of the Matrimonial Causes Act 1973: Financial factorsKirsty Allison
Ìý
The document discusses UK laws governing finances in divorce cases, including the Matrimonial Causes Act 1973 and related case law. It outlines the courts' powers to approve and change the financial positions of parties upon divorce. It describes the factors courts must consider under section 25 of the MCA 1973, such as the financial resources and needs of the parties, the standard of living enjoyed during the marriage, and the conduct of the parties. Case law is discussed that provides guidance on applying these statutory factors.Judicial Separation in England and Wales
Judicial Separation in England and WalesKirsty Allison
Ìý
An applicant for legal separation must prove one of five facts under the Matrimonial Causes Act 1973 to be granted a separation. A legal separation and divorce have similar effects, including preventing inheritance, ending cohabitation obligations, and allowing financial relief. If divorce is barred, one can pursue legal separation instead within the first year of marriage by proving any of the five facts, without needing to show an irretrievable breakdown of the marriage. A legal separation can result in financial orders, maintenance obligations, an end to cohabitation, barring inheritance, and the potential for reconciliation if remarriage is prohibited.Civil Partnerships in England and Wales
Civil Partnerships in England and WalesKirsty Allison
Ìý
Civil partnerships allow same-sex couples to legally recognize their relationship, equivalent to marriage. Partners obtain property rights, inheritance, and pension benefits. To end a civil partnership, one must apply for dissolution after one year, which deals with financial and property settlements similarly to divorce. Grounds for dissolution include irretrievable breakdown, two years living apart by consent, or five years living apart. Nullity or separation orders are also possible under certain conditions.Criminal damage
Criminal damageKirsty Allison
Ìý
The document discusses criminal damage offenses under the Criminal Damage Act 1971. It outlines the 3 offenses as basic criminal damage, aggravated criminal damage, and arson as defined in Section 1 of the Act. For basic criminal damage, the 3 elements that must be proven are: 1) destruction or damage, 2) to property, and 3) belonging to another. Damage is broadly defined based on case law. Aggravated criminal damage requires the additional element of intending or recklessly endangering life. Defenses to criminal damage are also provided in Section 5 of the Act.Criminal Law: Intoxication
Criminal Law: IntoxicationKirsty Allison
Ìý
This document summarizes several cases related to the defense of intoxication in criminal law. It establishes that voluntary intoxication generally cannot be used as a defense, as drunken intent is still considered intent. However, if a defendant was intoxicated to the point of lacking the necessary mental state or mens rea for the crime, intoxication could provide a defense for crimes requiring specific intent but not crimes of basic intent or manslaughter. Subsequent cases further clarified that mistakes due to intoxication cannot be relied on as a defense and that involuntary intoxication is also not a valid defense.Criminal Law: Diminished Responsibility 
Criminal Law: Diminished Responsibility Kirsty Allison
Ìý
This document outlines the four elements of the diminished responsibility defense in criminal cases in the UK: 1) the defendant had an abnormality of mental functioning, 2) the abnormality was a recognized medical condition, 3) the abnormality substantially impaired the defendant's ability to understand their actions, and 4) the abnormality provides an explanation for why the defendant carried out the killing. Case law has established that the impairment does not need to be total and is determined by a jury to be something between total and trivial or minimal. The abnormality and impaired state of mind must also be present at the time of the alleged killing.Tort Law: Public Policy And Psychiatric Injury
Tort Law: Public Policy And Psychiatric InjuryKirsty Allison
Ìý
This document discusses several court cases related to public policy and psychiatric injury from tort cases. It establishes that courts now have the power to consider public policy implications when imposing liability. One case did not impose liability on police who failed to act on a warning about a teacher who later killed a student, though this was later challenged. The standard for primary victims claiming psychiatric injuries was that injuries must be reasonably foreseeable, and secondary victims must meet four criteria including witnessing the incident and having a close relationship to the primary victim.Tort Law: Causation 
Tort Law: Causation Kirsty Allison
Ìý
This document discusses several legal cases related to causation in tort law. It covers topics such as: factual causation tests like the "but for" test; multiple causes of harm where a defendant's actions contributed materially to the damage; intervening acts that may break the chain of causation; the thin skull rule where defendants must take victims as they find them; and the test that the harm suffered must be reasonably foreseeable to be recoverable.Unfair dismissal
Unfair dismissalKirsty Allison
Ìý
This document discusses unfair dismissal, including:
- 4 types of dismissal: fair, unfair, wrongful, constructive
- What constitutes unfair dismissal, including dismissal for a potentially fair reason without following fair procedure
- 4 automatically unfair reasons for dismissal relating to pregnancy, family reasons, representation, pay and hours
- 5 potentially fair reasons for dismissal under UK law: conduct, capability, redundancy, statutory restriction, other substantial reasons
- The 5 preliminary requirements for an unfair dismissal claim: 1 year continuous service, employee was dismissed, claim brought on time, not an excluded category, effective date of termination
Directives and direct effect
Directives and direct effectKirsty Allison
Ìý
Directives issued by the EU are binding on Member States and must be implemented within a strict time limit. Once implemented, individuals can rely on directives through direct effect. There are two types of direct effect: horizontal between citizens, and vertical against the state. Unimplemented directives can still be directly effective against emanations of the state like local authorities through vertical direct effect. Private companies are not considered emanations of the state so individuals cannot rely on unimplemented directives against them. National courts must interpret national law in line with directives whether implemented or not through the principle of indirect effect.Contract Case Law: Acceptance
Contract Case Law: AcceptanceKirsty Allison
Ìý
This document summarizes several contract law cases related to acceptance of offers. It discusses cases where purported acceptances were found to be counteroffers, where acceptance was not communicated, where the acceptance needed to be a specific form, and where the accepting party did not have authority. It also covers cases where acceptance was found through conduct instead of words, acceptance of unilateral offers is completed through action, and establishes the postal rule that acceptance is effective upon posting.Types of Offence
Types of OffenceKirsty Allison
Ìý
This document outlines three categories of criminal offences in the UK legal system: summary offences, which are less serious and always tried in Magistrates' Court; either way offences, which can be tried in either Magistrates' Court or Crown Court depending on the degree of harm; and indictable offences, which are more serious crimes that must be tried in Crown Court, such as murder, manslaughter, and rape.Implementing directives
- 2. Article 249: of the Treaty of Rome gives the EU the power to issue directives Directives are binding on Member States But it is left to the Member State to use their own laws to implement the directives and that such laws have to be implemented within a set time limit set by the European Commission
- 3. The usual method for implementing directives: in the UK is through delegated legislation Direct Effect The Unfair Terms in Working Time Consumer Contracts Regulations (1998) Regulations is in the form implement the European of secondary legislation Working Time Directive introduced to implement a into GB law European Directive.