This document summarizes an agenda for an IoT/Ethics subgroup meeting. It discusses key issues around privacy, security, responsibility, and fairness with the rise of IoT technologies. The group aims to establish objectives to address these issues, such as designing for privacy, responsibility, and public trust. They also discuss assessing the impact of these issues and determining appropriate policy approaches, such as self-regulation or binding law. The meeting will focus on further defining challenges and objectives, and translating the objectives into potential policy options to address the ethical impacts of IoT.
1 of 16
Downloaded 12 times
More Related Content
IoT week Venice 2012 - Ethics Sub group presentation
2. PEOPLE
Jeroen van den Hoven, Professor of Moral Philosophy
Francien Dechesne, Postdoc researcher (STARS project)
Job Timmermans, Researcher (ETICA project)
5. AN ETHICS OF IOT?
Party Stopper
or
Unique Selling Point?
IOT raises ethics challenges and opportunities
related to
autonomy, security, equity, equality,
justice, access, discrimination,
data profiling, confidentiality, .
7. ISSUES 1/3
Privacy & Security
Blurring of contexts: private vs. public
Informed Consent vs. Obfuscation of Functionality
Confidence vs. Trust
Agency: social contract between people and objects?
Non-neutrality of IoT Metaphores
8. ISSUES 2/3
Responsibility & Precautionary Principle
Responsible Innovation & Setting new standards
Social justice & Digital divide
Support solving existing problems
Adaptation to mediated environment
9. ISSUES 3/3
New organizational principles and institutional design
New ontology
Fair distribution costs and benefits
Public acceptance of innovative technology
Technology lock-in
12. OBJECTIVES 1/2
Preservation of privacy by design at the level of code,
devices, institutions
Establish criteria for responsibility/liability/ accountability
with regards to the functioning of IoT.
A fair distribution of costs and benefits of IoT. Part of this
goal should be the evaluation of risks involved in IoT.
Prevent widening of digital divide; use potential of IoT to
close the gap.
13. OBJECTIVES 2/2
Operationalize public values into the design of IoT in as early
a stage of its development as possible.
Design for trust
Design for public acceptability.
Strive for conceptual clarity to prevent the dialogue and
policy measures from being misdirected
14. IMPACT & POLICY
Possible implications of issues and objectives?
Which will be the adequate policy types for which issue:
- Do nothing / Self-regulation
- Soft law
- Co-regulation
- Binding law
15. NEXT STEPS
Issues & challenges
Further completion & categorization
Objectives
Distil & categorize
Policy Options
Translate objectives into policy options
Impact
Assess possible impact
16. CALL FOR PAPERS
Special Issue of Ethics and Information Technology (ETIN)
on the Internet of Things (IoT)