ºÝºÝߣ

ºÝºÝߣShare a Scribd company logo
Mahesh Patil 
M130379ME 
Thermal Science
Phase I 
ï‚žIntroduction 
ï‚žResearch papers 
Phase II 
ï‚žCFD analysis
Research Paper 1 
 Progress in Aerospace Sciences 37 (2001) 385– 
418 
ï‚ž Anthony M. Mitchell, Jean Delery 
 Vortex breakdown detrimental or beneficial 
effects, depending on the application. 
 Diverse control methods developed 
 Still a superior efficiency or effectiveness in 
controlling either the vertical flow structure or the 
vortex breakdown location? – not fully 
understood
 In a water tunnel over a slender delta wing as 
a result of the emission of colored dye near 
the apex 
 The control and exact location vortex 
breakdown- requires basic understanding and 
physics of the phenomenon 
 Techniques- mechanical, pneumatic 
 Major obstacles in vortex breakdown 
implementation in new generation aircrafts 
like delta winged.
Research Paper 2 
ï‚ž The numerical simulation of the flow around a 
65â—¦ delta wing configuration with rounded 
leading edges is presented 
ï‚ž Numerical solutions: RANS ( Reynolds-Averaged 
Navier-Stoke eqs.) using different turbulent 
models 
ï‚ž How flow topology depends on angle of attack 
and Reynolds no.
ï‚žWilcox k-w model (k-w) 
ï‚žSpalart Allmaras model (SA) 
ï‚žCFD simulations around a 65â—¦ delta wing 
with rounded leading edges and angle of 
attack α = 13.3◦ carried out 
ï‚žinner vortex is generated out of a vorticity 
layer moving downstream 
ï‚žinner vortex occurs before the outer vortex 
is generated
Presentation on delta wing
Research Paper 3 
ï‚žAzize Akcayoglu (2011) 
ï‚žExperimental study of flow structure in 
horizontal equilateral triangular ducts 
having double rows of half delta-wing 
type vortex generators mounted on the 
duct’s slant surfaces 
ï‚žFlow field measurements using PIV 
(particle image velocimetry)
ï‚žCFU & CFD ( common flow up & common 
flow down ) 
ï‚žContradictory results in earlier litterature 
ï‚žSo verified through experiment
ï‚žReynolds no. varied from 1000 to 8000 
ï‚žDuct 1 : pair of CFU (common flow up) 
ï‚žDuct 2: CFU + CFD 
ï‚žMotivation: which duct gives larger vortex 
formation 
ï‚žResult: duct 2 gives larger vortex formation 
& greater induced vorticity
Research Paper 4 
ï‚ž A. Joardar, A.M. Jacobi (2005) 
ï‚ž Experimentally verified the effectiveness of delta 
wing type vortex generators using full scale wind 
tunnel 
ï‚ž Compact heat exchanger is used (eg. 
Automobile radiator)
ï‚žAverage heat transfer enhancement by 
21% 
ï‚žPressure drop penalty of 6%
Reseach Paper 5 
Russell M. Cummings, Andreas Schütte 
(2013) 
ï‚ž International VFE (vortex flow experiment) 
ï‚žNumerical solution within for VFE-2 delta 
wing 
with rounded leading edge 
ï‚ž Simulation software: Cobalt Navier-Stoke 
solver 
ï‚žSA, SARC, DES, DDES
ï‚ž CFD calculation with the unstructured Cobalt 
code are presented 
ï‚ž Used various turbulent models and compared 
with experimental data available (surface 
pressure, PIV) 
ï‚ž RANS simulation results close to experimental 
results than DES, DDES.
ï‚žCFD analysis of flow over delta wing to 
evaluate the thermal performance of 
automboile radiator
Presentation on delta wing

More Related Content

Presentation on delta wing

  • 1. Mahesh Patil M130379ME Thermal Science
  • 2. Phase I ï‚žIntroduction ï‚žResearch papers Phase II ï‚žCFD analysis
  • 3. Research Paper 1 ï‚ž Progress in Aerospace Sciences 37 (2001) 385– 418 ï‚ž Anthony M. Mitchell, Jean Delery  Vortex breakdown detrimental or beneficial effects, depending on the application.  Diverse control methods developed  Still a superior efficiency or effectiveness in controlling either the vertical flow structure or the vortex breakdown location? – not fully understood
  • 4.  In a water tunnel over a slender delta wing as a result of the emission of colored dye near the apex  The control and exact location vortex breakdown- requires basic understanding and physics of the phenomenon  Techniques- mechanical, pneumatic  Major obstacles in vortex breakdown implementation in new generation aircrafts like delta winged.
  • 5. Research Paper 2 ï‚ž The numerical simulation of the flow around a 65â—¦ delta wing configuration with rounded leading edges is presented ï‚ž Numerical solutions: RANS ( Reynolds-Averaged Navier-Stoke eqs.) using different turbulent models ï‚ž How flow topology depends on angle of attack and Reynolds no.
  • 6. ï‚žWilcox k-w model (k-w) ï‚žSpalart Allmaras model (SA) ï‚žCFD simulations around a 65â—¦ delta wing with rounded leading edges and angle of attack α = 13.3â—¦ carried out ï‚žinner vortex is generated out of a vorticity layer moving downstream ï‚žinner vortex occurs before the outer vortex is generated
  • 8. Research Paper 3 ï‚žAzize Akcayoglu (2011) ï‚žExperimental study of flow structure in horizontal equilateral triangular ducts having double rows of half delta-wing type vortex generators mounted on the duct’s slant surfaces ï‚žFlow field measurements using PIV (particle image velocimetry)
  • 9. ï‚žCFU & CFD ( common flow up & common flow down ) ï‚žContradictory results in earlier litterature ï‚žSo verified through experiment
  • 10. ï‚žReynolds no. varied from 1000 to 8000 ï‚žDuct 1 : pair of CFU (common flow up) ï‚žDuct 2: CFU + CFD ï‚žMotivation: which duct gives larger vortex formation ï‚žResult: duct 2 gives larger vortex formation & greater induced vorticity
  • 11. Research Paper 4 ï‚ž A. Joardar, A.M. Jacobi (2005) ï‚ž Experimentally verified the effectiveness of delta wing type vortex generators using full scale wind tunnel ï‚ž Compact heat exchanger is used (eg. Automobile radiator)
  • 12. ï‚žAverage heat transfer enhancement by 21% ï‚žPressure drop penalty of 6%
  • 13. Reseach Paper 5 ï‚žRussell M. Cummings, Andreas Schütte (2013) ï‚ž International VFE (vortex flow experiment) ï‚žNumerical solution within for VFE-2 delta wing with rounded leading edge ï‚ž Simulation software: Cobalt Navier-Stoke solver ï‚žSA, SARC, DES, DDES
  • 14. ï‚ž CFD calculation with the unstructured Cobalt code are presented ï‚ž Used various turbulent models and compared with experimental data available (surface pressure, PIV) ï‚ž RANS simulation results close to experimental results than DES, DDES.
  • 15. ï‚žCFD analysis of flow over delta wing to evaluate the thermal performance of automboile radiator