The document discusses the filmmaker's choice to use independent distribution company Future Films and production company Blueprint for their low-budget film. Future Films and Blueprint have experience working on similar small, niche films with limited budgets compared to major studios. Examples provided of films from each company support that they deal in low-profile, low-cost productions, making them well-suited to distribute and produce the filmmaker's low-budget film.
1 of 3
Download to read offline
More Related Content
Q3 presentation
1. In our film we used ‘Future films’ as our distribution company and ‘Blueprint’ as
our production company.
These companies are independent, niche not with not very high budgets
compared to other major companies such as Warner bros., Sony, Disney, and
the films they have distributed or produce are not very well known, which could
be due to lack of funds.
I chose to use these companies because they have worked with
the same type of low budget film as I have got therefore they
will have experience in being able to reach out to cinemas and
people who will be interested in raw low budget films.
2. Future films
An example of films that ‘Future films’ have
distributed are:
Annabels kitchen
Malice in wonderland
Salvador
These film are very niche and not very known
which I fee would be the route my film will
follow due to the production which is why I feel
future films will be ideal to distribute my film.
3. An example of films that Blue print
production have produced are: Vigilante
Keybowl
Link
These seem to of had a very low budget in the production
which is the same my film which makes blueprint an ideal
production company for us.