1. The document discusses three modern Islamic scholars - Mawdudi, Hamidullah, and Al-Zuhayli - and their views on jus ad bellum (justice in war) and jus in bello (justice during war) from an Islamic perspective.
2. On jus ad bellum, all three scholars agree that defensive wars and wars to protect religious freedom are justified, but they differ on other grounds for war. Mawdudi adds wars for reform and against apostasy, while Hamidullah and Al-Zuhayli categorize other permitted wars.
3. On jus in bello, all prohibit cruelty, killing ambassadors, and post-surrender killing. Their
2. Modern Scholars concentrate on jus ad
bellum:
reinterpret grounds for jihad
International humanitarian law
Writing on jus in bello is limited/prohibited in some
oppressive states
3. Meet Abu al-
Ala Mawdudi
(1903-1979
Founded jama at-I Islam
Wrote al-jihad fi al-Islam
(1926) and Published Quranic
Commentary, tafhim al-
Quran 1950-1973
6. Why the three?
Adopt same methodology and substance in the study of the
theory of jihad
Addresses prevailing international legal regime
Similar conclusions on the ethics of killing and saving life
Exegeses of authoritative texts
Hamidullah Sharia
Al-Zuhayla Sharia
Mawdudi Quran and Hadith
8. Mawdudi
Do not slay the soul sanctified by God, except for just cause 6: 151; 25:68)
Types of legitimate wars
1. Defensive
2. Reformative
Authorities
Quran:
1. Homicide retaliation is justified
2. Opposing the preaching of Islam
3. Spreading disorder in the Domain of Islam
10. Hamidullah
Muslims think of war only as unavoidable, not as desired or to
be sought after. It is the exception to the normal state of
peace.
Categorizes permitted wars into
1. Defensive (includes preventive strikes)
2. Sympathetic
3. Punitive
4. Idealistic
11. Al-Zuhayli
War is a necessary aspect of human existence, one sanctioned
by the Quran for self-defense and preserving a just society.
Categorizes legitimate war into
War against those block the preaching of Islam
Defense against persecution (R2P)
War to repel aggression against oneself and ones country
Jihad goes beyond international law (to protect/within
national boundaries)
13. Jus in bello
Combatants Noncombatants WMD Quarter (aman)
Give quarter to the
enemy Q: 90
Prisoners of war Necessity(darura)
Permit attacks if
military necessity
requires it regardless
of whether
noncombatants are
likely to die
Prohibits:
- Cruel killing e.g.
Burning alive,
torture, and
mutilation
- killing of
ambassadors
- taking hostages as
shields
- massacre following
surrender
- killing through
treachery and
perfidy
Mawdudi take part in fighting
e.g. adult males
All adult male may
be killed
lack mental and
physical capacity to
fight
Women, children, old
people, the sick,
wounded, the blind,
the insane, travelers,
hermits, religious
functionaries
Immunity
Did not address issue
WMD
Muslims obliged to
develop and acquire
all types of weapons
Q8:60
*How about killing all
adult males?
Prohibits killing of
the prisoners
To be freed or
ransomed
Hamidullah Women, children, old
people, the sick,
wounded, the blind,
the insane, travelers,
hermits, religious
functionaries,
peasants, traders,
merchants,
contractors
Immunity
Not addressed Not to be killed
Exceptions
-the order of the
imam (Muslim
interest
Al-Zuhayla Those who prepare
for battle e.g. soldiers
(officers and enlisted
men), head of state,
military leaders,
military medical
personnel etc.
Will be targeted
Women, children,
and those who do
ordinarily do not
take part in fighting.
Do not fight anyone
unless they fight you
WMD permissible
To be used as a last
resort and only in
retaliation
Prohibit the use of
poisons
Do not kill prisoners
Freedom or ransom
Killing of prisoners
in Islam is closer to
being prohibited than
is to being
permitted...