Emerging solutions include:
Private sectors growing interest: corporate investments in resilient supply chains, institutional investors net zero and sustainability goals, impact, and philanthropic investors focus on paying for the impact.
Innovative financial instruments and blended finance approaches can align different sectors incentives: equity, debt, insurance, concessional finance, carbon markets, & PES programs/ markets.
Partnerships and platforms to connect global investors to locally-led initiatives.
2. Objectives and audience
Overview of opportunities and obstacles to scaling up
public and private investment in restoration
Define a pathway to overcome obstacles to scaling up
investment
Main target audiences: governments, donors, the
financial sector, and real-sector companies
3. Reconciling the restoration investment
rationale and the financing gap
Public, private, and philanthropic investors have
different but overlapping and often
synergistic investment rationales.
To close the large financing gap, actions are
needed to:
Strengthen the investment case for public and private
sector actors
Develop a supportive enabling environment via
policies and regulations
Facilitate investments in a range of restoration
activities that appeal to different sectors
Restorative continuum
4. Emerging solutions
Private sectors growing interest: corporate investments in
resilient supply chains, institutional investors net zero and
sustainability goals, impact and philanthropic investors focus on
paying for impact
Innovative financial instruments and blended finance
approaches can align different sectors incentives: equity, debt,
insurance, concessional finance, carbon markets, & PES
programs/ markets
Partnerships and platforms to connect global investors to locally-
led initiatives
5. Pillars of the Finance Task Force
Roadmap
1) Government and Sectoral Policy Levers
Disseminate partners work on subsidy reform, PES programs/ markets, landscape management, &
land tenure
2) Knowledge, Data and Tools
Develop restoration taxonomy; restoration cost/ benefit database, analytics, tools, trainings; & trade-
offs assessment guide
3) Financial Sector Regulations / Initiatives
Review of financial sector regulation, guidance, and tools to ensure restoration is accounted for (i.e.,
taxonomies, credit rating methodologies, risk assessment approaches, etc.)
4) Financial Markets / Investments
Templates for replicable or scalable investment structures, assessment of MRV cost reduction trends
and barriers
#4: Restoration activities along the continuum
Costa Rica example, structural changes in the economy
Key drivers of underinvestment include:
insufficient awareness about the critical role of ecosystem services in the economy and society;
lack of a taxonomy of restoration activities and standardized frameworks and institutions for managing a portfolio of restoration projects;
inadequate knowledge and data on the costs and benefits of restoration;
the structure and timing of the costs and benefits of restoration, which make the risk-return profiles of investments less competitive than other types of investments;
lack of knowledge about bankable business models for restoration projects;
difficulty monetizing the benefits of some types of restoration;
taxes and subsidies that drive degradation and fail to incentivize restoration;
lack of sectoral and financial policy and regulation that incentivize private sector investment in restoration; and
land and sea tenure uncertainty or insecurity and unequal distribution of derived benefits, preventing sound governance and management of the natural assets.
#5: Once these steps are complete, public, private, and non-profit actors can collaborate to link investment needs and opportunities with appropriate funding sources. For example:
Corporations represent an important potential source for restoration finance through investment in resilient supply chains for food and fiber-based products, (Bancilhon et al., 2018).
Institutional investors are looking for opportunities with market returns that are compatible with or contribute to their net zero and sustainability goals and commitments.
Impact investors and philanthropic finance weight environmental and social impacts more highly than traditional investors, and may be willing to pay for impact.
Public and concessional finance can be blended with the sources detailed above to de-risk or credit enhance.