The document discusses whether learning is more like a science or an art by comparing their key characteristics and using the analogy of building a canoe. It questions whether standardized exams and a common curriculum that treats students like products on an assembly line, as in a factory model, allows for the flexibility and variability that an artisan model focusing on individual needs and abilities provides. Precise dimensions may be less important than durability and functionality for students, as with canoe ribs adapting to each piece of wood.
8. Apply the analogy to studentsWhat are the most important qualities students will have on completion of a unit/course/program?What functions should they be able to perform under what conditions?How critical are undetected weaknesses?Will the student float?Survive the rapids?
9. How important are the precise dimensions of the canoe to its ability to function successfully?It must have sufficient length, depth, width and shape to carry its intended passengers and cargo, but there are many suitable variations
10. Does the way we design courses, classrooms and assessment allow for this variability?Or do we push everything through a pre-set jig and expect to discard a certain percentage as substandard and unusable?The factory modelGroups of studentsCommon curriculumScheduled time/durationStandardized examsFocus on acquisition of a common set of facts/knowledge/skillsTime is fixed, level of success is variable
11. The artisan modelPre-assessmentIndividual projectsOffice hours (personal contact)Focus on development of interest, unique abilitiesTime required to achieve success is variable