際際滷

際際滷Share a Scribd company logo
Sky
Harbor
Airport
Renewable
Photovoltaic
Project
December 2011
17 MEGAWATT PHOTOVOLTAIC
INSTALLATION AT SKY HARBOR
AIRPORT
 Siting
 Investment and value
 Simulation and analysis
 Technology
 Considerations and concerns
 Multiple benefits
~100 acres above parking lots and atop parking structures
throughout Phoenix Sky Harbor International Airport
DEMAND
SAVINGS
APS E-32 and E-34 rate structures
1. Charged for kWh used (usage)
2. Charged on monthly kW peak (demand)
minimum bill is 80% of annual peak
Terminal 4 (E-34 rate structure)
 $17.337/kW at peak demand
= $1,927,593.49
Terminal 4, with 50% demand reduction
 $17.337/kW at peak demand
= $963,796.75
$963,797/yr savings just from shaving
peak demand
RATE
SAVINGS
12 largest loads at Sky Harbor Airport,
FY 2011 electricity usage:
124,670,900 kWh
$10,763,808
= 8.56 cents/kWh
SHARPP produces 29,171,538 kWh
annually
@ 8.56 cents/kWh from APS
= $2,497,084/yr
SHARPP cost of 29,171,538 kWh
= $1,750,292/yr
$746,792/yr (7%) savings just on
replacing APS electricity with SHARPP
COST and
EFFICIENCY
SHARPP as an investment
 Government-owned
 No sales tax
 No property tax
 No income tax
 100% loan through bonds
(3% interest)
 LCOE 6.00 cents/kWh
(compare to 8.56 cents/kWh with APS)
Net Annual Energy 29,171,538 kWh
PPA price (LCOE) 6.00 cents/kWh
Debt Fraction 100%
kWh/kW 1,716
Total Land Area 72.82 acres
TECHNOLOGY
Axis
Fixed tilt, latitude - 15属 = 18属 due south
Inverters
179 Solectria PVI 95kW 480V
Modules
60,764 Suntech 280 Watt polycrystalline
solar module, STP280-24-Vb
11 modules per string
5,524 strings in parallel
CONSTRUCTION
CONCERNS
 Federal Aviation Administration
 Wildlife
 Hohokam ruins
 Pollution and noise
 City of Phoenix property
 Risk of aircraft collision / power
interruption
Arizona cliff rose Lesser long-nosed bat
California least tern
STORAGE
CONSIDERATION
 Batteries
 Compressed air
 Methane production
 Grid-tied net metering
Sky harbor usage
Local substations
BENEFITS
 6.00 cents/kWh
 Mitigates peak demand rates,
multiplying the savings of a solar
installation
 Financially viable for the City of
Phoenix
 Grid-connected
 Increases energy independence
 Less taxpayer money funding airport
utilities
 Boosts local economy through jobs
 Creates positive community image
 Visible representation of Arizonas
renewable energy efforts

More Related Content

Sky Harbor Airport Renewable Powerplant Project

  • 2. 17 MEGAWATT PHOTOVOLTAIC INSTALLATION AT SKY HARBOR AIRPORT Siting Investment and value Simulation and analysis Technology Considerations and concerns Multiple benefits
  • 3. ~100 acres above parking lots and atop parking structures throughout Phoenix Sky Harbor International Airport
  • 4. DEMAND SAVINGS APS E-32 and E-34 rate structures 1. Charged for kWh used (usage) 2. Charged on monthly kW peak (demand) minimum bill is 80% of annual peak Terminal 4 (E-34 rate structure) $17.337/kW at peak demand = $1,927,593.49 Terminal 4, with 50% demand reduction $17.337/kW at peak demand = $963,796.75 $963,797/yr savings just from shaving peak demand
  • 5. RATE SAVINGS 12 largest loads at Sky Harbor Airport, FY 2011 electricity usage: 124,670,900 kWh $10,763,808 = 8.56 cents/kWh SHARPP produces 29,171,538 kWh annually @ 8.56 cents/kWh from APS = $2,497,084/yr SHARPP cost of 29,171,538 kWh = $1,750,292/yr $746,792/yr (7%) savings just on replacing APS electricity with SHARPP
  • 6. COST and EFFICIENCY SHARPP as an investment Government-owned No sales tax No property tax No income tax 100% loan through bonds (3% interest) LCOE 6.00 cents/kWh (compare to 8.56 cents/kWh with APS) Net Annual Energy 29,171,538 kWh PPA price (LCOE) 6.00 cents/kWh Debt Fraction 100% kWh/kW 1,716 Total Land Area 72.82 acres
  • 7. TECHNOLOGY Axis Fixed tilt, latitude - 15属 = 18属 due south Inverters 179 Solectria PVI 95kW 480V Modules 60,764 Suntech 280 Watt polycrystalline solar module, STP280-24-Vb 11 modules per string 5,524 strings in parallel
  • 8. CONSTRUCTION CONCERNS Federal Aviation Administration Wildlife Hohokam ruins Pollution and noise City of Phoenix property Risk of aircraft collision / power interruption Arizona cliff rose Lesser long-nosed bat California least tern
  • 9. STORAGE CONSIDERATION Batteries Compressed air Methane production Grid-tied net metering Sky harbor usage Local substations
  • 10. BENEFITS 6.00 cents/kWh Mitigates peak demand rates, multiplying the savings of a solar installation Financially viable for the City of Phoenix Grid-connected Increases energy independence Less taxpayer money funding airport utilities Boosts local economy through jobs Creates positive community image Visible representation of Arizonas renewable energy efforts

Editor's Notes

  1. Viable sites for rooftop and parking lot solar
  2. Demand expense is based solely on PEAK usage. Red = currently billed amount; Blue = projected billed amount. Demand savings are the delta between Red-yellow gap and blue-green gap (reduction in overpayment). Consumption savings are the delta between red and blue.
  3. Rate savings is based on total annual consumption on large-load flat-rate fee schedule. 12 largest loads = ~80% of total airport consumption