System Reliability & Availability Modeling with Weibull Learning Objectives (3)
1 like355 views
This document outlines the learning objectives and activities for a three-day training on system reliability and availability modeling using Weibull analysis and availability modeling. Day 1 focuses on applying Weibull analysis to failure data through individual and group exercises to determine parameters, calculate reliability, and build process reliability plots. Day 2 introduces availability modeling, including building reliability block diagrams, calculating system reliability for series, redundant, and complex systems through individual and group exercises. An optional Day 3 allows building and analyzing complex system models using simulation software.
1 of 1
Downloaded 16 times
Recommended
Impact_Map_Intro_To_Avail_Modeling_With_Weibull
Impact_Map_Intro_To_Avail_Modeling_With_WeibullBill Keeter
Ìý
This document outlines the learning objectives of a training course on reliability and availability modeling with Weibull analysis. The course will teach participants how to calculate and interpret Weibull parameters, build process reliability plots, improve data collection, and create reliability block diagrams. Through practice exercises, participants will learn to analyze failure data, calculate system reliability and availability, and determine ways to improve system designs and maintenance strategies. The overall goals are to improve reliability engineering skills and provide information to help organizations enhance system availability, performance consistency, and profit margins.Introduction_to_FRACAS - Course_Outline
Introduction_to_FRACAS - Course_OutlineBill Keeter
Ìý
This document describes a two-day training course on developing and implementing a Failure Reporting, Analysis, and Corrective Action System (FRACAS). The course will teach maintenance and operations personnel how to build the basic elements of an effective FRACAS, including developing a data collection plan, failure codes, roles and responsibilities, and procedures. Participants will practice analyzing sample failure data and developing corrective actions. The goal is to provide attendees with the skills to start building their organization's FRACAS.Priya Vasudevan_Analytics_Summit_Poster
Priya Vasudevan_Analytics_Summit_PosterPriya Vasudevan
Ìý
The document describes Intel's Product Improvement Program which uses data-driven decisions and analytics of telemetry collected from over 1.6 million users across various platforms and countries to optimize products. Some of the benefits of the program include identifying deprecated features to remove, prioritizing features to focus efforts on, adding new features, reducing time to market, direct cost savings, and increasing revenue. The program measures its success based on the fresh data collected daily and provides timely feedback to continuously improve products.TM1 Healthcheck - QueBIT Consulting
TM1 Healthcheck - QueBIT ConsultingQueBIT Consulting
Ìý
Ongoing Performance Diagnostics are a critical part of maintaining your enterprise-wide applications. If you have not done a diagnostic assessment of your system in a while, a TM1 Healthcheck engagement with QueBIT will identify areas in which your TM1 performance and experience can be improved. Julie Rampello Maximo workshop IMC 2013 presentation
Julie Rampello Maximo workshop IMC 2013 presentationProjetech
Ìý
Julie Rampello gave a presentation on using Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) in IBM Maximo to measure the effectiveness of reliability programs and support organizational objectives. She discussed selecting relevant KPIs, collecting accurate data from various sources, and using Maximo's built-in features like the KPI manager and reporting tools to analyze trends over time. Examples of KPIs included maintenance costs, equipment uptime, and safety metrics. Rampello stressed the importance of prioritizing vital few KPIs and integrating data from Maximo and other systems for meaningful analysis of reliability program success.Chapter No:3 Web Productivity Measurement and Benchmarking
Chapter No:3 Web Productivity Measurement and BenchmarkingSofthat IT Solutions
Ìý
This document defines software engineering productivity and how it is measured. Productivity is defined as the ratio of output to input, with output typically measured as lines of code or functions, and input as effort measured in costs, resources, and time. Productivity of a web application is difficult to measure due to the lack of a standard size measure that aggregates all aspects into a single value. The document proposes using an "adjusted size" measure that accounts for effort-related size factors. It also discusses how to increase productivity through efficient processes, effective teams, and simplifying products. A case study analysis of web project data found that team size, programming languages used, and experience impacted productivity.Dylan Wiliam
Dylan Wiliamservusuk
Ìý
The document discusses the key components of formative assessment and feedback. It defines feedback as data on a student's actual performance level compared to a reference level, along with a mechanism for using that information to close the gap between the two levels. For an assessment to be truly formative, the feedback must be used by the student to make improvements, and include guidance on future actions. The document argues there is no such thing as inherently formative assessment - it is defined by how the results are applied by teachers and learners.Product Increment Feedback Architecture - DevOpsDays - Warsaw
Product Increment Feedback Architecture - DevOpsDays - WarsawMassimo Fascinari
Ìý
A view on how structuring the Architecture for managing Product Increment Feedback and Experiment at ScaleService level agreements
Service level agreementsJISC RSC Eastern
Ìý
The document discusses service level agreements and metrics for IT services. It outlines key metrics to measure like call resolution time and customer satisfaction. It also defines priority levels from P1 to P5 based on the impact and urgency of issues. Examples of common issues are provided for each priority level depending on whether they affect the organization, building, or single user. Continuous improvement and regular reporting on metrics are important aspects of service level agreements.Ch07
Ch07Kodok Ngorex
Ìý
The document discusses the evolution and components of CASE (computer-aided software engineering) tools from 1980 to 1990, including their use of central repositories and automated design, analysis, and code generation. It also covers typical tasks for large-scale JAD (joint application development) environments and compares the traditional software development life cycle to RAD (rapid application development).Information systems lifecycle
Information systems lifecycleRizwan Kabir
Ìý
The document outlines the key stages in the information systems lifecycle:
1) Initiation - where a need for a new system is identified, such as an outdated current system.
2) Analysis - requirements are analyzed through interviews, documentation review, and observation.
3) Design - the system design is created including hardware, software, outputs, and user interface.
4) Implementation - the system is coded, tested, hardware/software is installed, and users are trained.
5) Maintenance - the system is maintained through perfective, adaptive and corrective maintenance.Software testing one
Software testing onessteststaging3
Ìý
Regression testing alone is insufficient and suffers from fatigue over time as bugs are fixed but new runs provide little additional information. To improve test coverage and effectiveness, complementary techniques should be combined, such as combining automation with risk-based equivalence analysis. The coverage achieved by combining techniques can exceed the sum of using each technique individually. When adopting new techniques, organizations should determine their current test approach and weaknesses, identify a practical and risk-focused additional technique to address shortcomings, and apply the new technique until proficiency is achieved through iteration.System development phases
System development phasesPrabinBista05
Ìý
The document outlines the system development life cycle (SDLC), which includes 7 phases: 1) system study, 2) system analysis, 3) system design, 4) system development, 5) system testing, 6) implementation, and 7) maintenance and review. Key aspects of each phase are discussed at a high level, such as conducting a feasibility study in system analysis or different types of testing in system testing. The overall SDLC process from initial study through ongoing maintenance is summarized.Closed Loop Corrective Action
Closed Loop Corrective Actionahmad bassiouny
Ìý
The document discusses closed-loop corrective action (CLCA), which is a process for identifying problems, determining their root causes, developing and implementing solutions to prevent recurrence, and verifying the effectiveness of the solutions. It covers determining the cause of issues, deciding if and what type of corrective action is needed, implementing and tracking corrective actions, handling customer complaints, and ensuring the actions address the root causes. Software tools are available to help facilitate tracking the CLCA process.Implementation
Implementation4goggas
Ìý
There are several reasons why information systems may fail or succeed during implementation. Systems can fail during analysis due to poor definition of objectives or insufficient user involvement. During design, systems may fail if users are not involved or flexibility is not considered. Programming errors can occur if development time is underestimated or documentation is lacking. Testing failures happen without proper test plans or user involvement in acceptance. Conversion issues arise when training and documentation are inadequate. Successful implementation involves user motivation, training, and involvement throughout; managing complexity; and having management support.Production analysis application_ SM Infocomm
Production analysis application_ SM Infocommmukul soni
Ìý
SM Infocom proposes a Production Analysis Application (PAA) to address challenges with complex production projects including time delays in addressing issues, a lack of insights from large amounts of data, and overreliance on manual processes. The PAA would consolidate production data from machines in real-time, perform analyses, and generate customizable reports to facilitate preventative action, improve resource utilization, reduce downtime, and increase output quality. Benefits of the PAA include real-time solutions, increased productivity and efficiency, better planning and forecasting, and reduced production costs.Aspect Oriented Programming - AOP/AOSD
Aspect Oriented Programming - AOP/AOSDCan R. PAHALI
Ìý
Contents
21.1 The separation of concerns
21.2 Aspects, join points, and pointcuts
21.3 Software engineering with aspectsFundamentals of software development
Fundamentals of software developmentPratik Devmurari
Ìý
The document provides an overview of fundamentals of software development including definitions of software, characteristics of software, software engineering, layered approach to software engineering, need for software engineering, and common software development life cycle models. It describes system software and application software. It outlines characteristics like understandability, cost, maintainability, modularity, reliability, portability, documentation, reusability, and interoperability. It also defines software engineering, layered approach, and need for software engineering. Finally, it explains popular life cycle models like waterfall, iterative waterfall, prototyping, spiral, and RAD models.Dev ops developer (session 3)
Dev ops developer (session 3)MSDEVMTL
Ìý
What is DevOps? It’s a fairly hot term in today’s application development and operations space,but there are many different definitions as to what DevOps really is. Ultimately, DevOps is abouthow teams build software, deploy software and maintain it throughout its lifecycle. There is nosingle, right answer to the question, but there are a number of tools and strategies that can helpcustomers adopt a winning DevOps process that allows dev and operations teams to moreproductive together.In this session, the audience will learn what DevOps is at a high level, provide strategies for howto implement a DevOps process that fits their organization’s needs and how the MicrosoftApplication Lifecycle Management (ALM) tooling can help with this. As part of the session,attendees can expect to learn how to set up the Microsoft ALM stack for their teams and how touse it effectively in their software development lifecycle, regardless of the role each individual plays on the team.IRJET - Recommendations Engine with Multi-Objective Contextual Bandits (U...
IRJET - Recommendations Engine with Multi-Objective Contextual Bandits (U...IRJET Journal
Ìý
This document describes a recommendation engine for e-commerce that uses reinforcement learning and multi-objective contextual bandits to satisfy both user and stakeholder needs. It aims to optimize fairness and relevance in recommendations. The system uses reinforcement mechanisms, naive Bayesian classification, clustering, and filtering algorithms to recommend products to users based on their preferences and browsing history. This helps users make informed decisions and increases sales and transactions for stakeholders. The system aims to address cold start problems and changing user preferences over time.SE18_Lec 03_ RUP
SE18_Lec 03_ RUPAmr E. Mohamed
Ìý
The document describes the Rational Unified Process (RUP), a generic iterative software development process. RUP brings together aspects of other generic process models and can be described from dynamic, static, and practice perspectives. It consists of four main phases - Inception, Elaboration, Construction, and Transition - with both in-phase and cross-phase iterations. Key principles of RUP include iterative development, managing requirements, using component-based architectures, modeling software visually, verifying quality, and controlling changes.Build for the future
Build for the futureMostafa Elfeky
Ìý
Describing our vision to enhance development process in five steps.
1- Build basic modules and wrap them with a set of startup-projects
2- Enhance already built and running project.
3- Define standard, specification and guidelines.
4- Achieve software quality factors
5- Define learning path.School management system
School management systemSoumya Behera
Ìý
The document describes a presentation for a school management system created by Soumya Subhadarshi Behera. The presentation includes an introduction, motivation, and system development sections. It provides background on the need for a school management system to efficiently manage student, employee, academic and other administrative data. It then covers the goals and components involved in developing the software system, including using Visual Basic 6.0 for the front end and Oracle for the back end database.cis 510 Focus Dreams/newtonhelp.com
cis 510 Focus Dreams/newtonhelp.combellflower88
Ìý
For more course tutorials visit
www.newtonhelp.com
This Tutorial contains 2 Papers for each Assignment
CIS 510 Week 2 Assignment 1 Error Handling in an Activity Diagram (2 Papers)
CIS 510 Week 4 Assignment 2 Assignment 2 Creating a Use Case (2 Papers)
cis 510 Imagine Your Future/newtonhelp.comÌý Ìý
cis 510 Imagine Your Future/newtonhelp.comÌý Ìýbellflower48
Ìý
For more course tutorials visit
www.newtonhelp.com
This Tutorial contains 2 Papers for each Assignment
CIS 510 Week 2 Assignment 1 Error Handling in an Activity Diagram (2 Papers)
CIS 510 Week 4 Assignment 2 Assignment 2 Creating a Use Case (2 Papers)
cis 510 Life of the Mind/newtonhelp.comÌý Ìý
cis 510 Life of the Mind/newtonhelp.comÌý Ìýbellflower6
Ìý
For more course tutorials visit
www.newtonhelp.com
This Tutorial contains 2 Papers for each Assignment
CIS 510 Week 2 Assignment 1 Error Handling in an Activity Diagram (2 Papers)
CIS 510 Week 4 Assignment 2 Assignment 2 Creating a Use Case (2 Papers)
generic-software-process-models.ppt
generic-software-process-models.pptAayush847388
Ìý
The document discusses several software process models including the waterfall model, evolutionary development, formal transformation, and reuse-based development. It then provides more details on the waterfall model and prototyping model. The waterfall model separates development into distinct phases like requirements, design, implementation, testing, and maintenance. The prototyping model emphasizes early prototypes for feedback. The document also discusses the spiral model which combines prototyping and waterfall elements and is used for large, complex projects.
B Fn As
B Fn AsSangwon Ko
Ìý
- The document discusses challenges in building application frameworks and applications simultaneously. It argues that the framework must be built in parallel with the applications that will use it.
- It presents patterns for developing frameworks and applications together, including starting with pilot applications to help define the framework's abstractions, and evolving the framework based on feedback from application developers.
- Metrics like the "Rule of Three" and "Budget Factor 2.5" are introduced to help scope the framework and schedule its development.From use case to software architecture
From use case to software architectureAhmad karawash
Ìý
The document discusses use cases and software architecture. It provides an overview of use cases, their benefits, and challenges. It then discusses how use cases relate to software architecture and different architectural views. The document proposes a methodology for developing use cases with 12 steps, including defining the system boundary, prioritizing use cases, describing use cases, and knowing when to stop. It also discusses challenges with complex use cases and proposes a technique called "use case chains" to reduce complexity.More Related Content
What's hot (9)
Service level agreements
Service level agreementsJISC RSC Eastern
Ìý
The document discusses service level agreements and metrics for IT services. It outlines key metrics to measure like call resolution time and customer satisfaction. It also defines priority levels from P1 to P5 based on the impact and urgency of issues. Examples of common issues are provided for each priority level depending on whether they affect the organization, building, or single user. Continuous improvement and regular reporting on metrics are important aspects of service level agreements.Ch07
Ch07Kodok Ngorex
Ìý
The document discusses the evolution and components of CASE (computer-aided software engineering) tools from 1980 to 1990, including their use of central repositories and automated design, analysis, and code generation. It also covers typical tasks for large-scale JAD (joint application development) environments and compares the traditional software development life cycle to RAD (rapid application development).Information systems lifecycle
Information systems lifecycleRizwan Kabir
Ìý
The document outlines the key stages in the information systems lifecycle:
1) Initiation - where a need for a new system is identified, such as an outdated current system.
2) Analysis - requirements are analyzed through interviews, documentation review, and observation.
3) Design - the system design is created including hardware, software, outputs, and user interface.
4) Implementation - the system is coded, tested, hardware/software is installed, and users are trained.
5) Maintenance - the system is maintained through perfective, adaptive and corrective maintenance.Software testing one
Software testing onessteststaging3
Ìý
Regression testing alone is insufficient and suffers from fatigue over time as bugs are fixed but new runs provide little additional information. To improve test coverage and effectiveness, complementary techniques should be combined, such as combining automation with risk-based equivalence analysis. The coverage achieved by combining techniques can exceed the sum of using each technique individually. When adopting new techniques, organizations should determine their current test approach and weaknesses, identify a practical and risk-focused additional technique to address shortcomings, and apply the new technique until proficiency is achieved through iteration.System development phases
System development phasesPrabinBista05
Ìý
The document outlines the system development life cycle (SDLC), which includes 7 phases: 1) system study, 2) system analysis, 3) system design, 4) system development, 5) system testing, 6) implementation, and 7) maintenance and review. Key aspects of each phase are discussed at a high level, such as conducting a feasibility study in system analysis or different types of testing in system testing. The overall SDLC process from initial study through ongoing maintenance is summarized.Closed Loop Corrective Action
Closed Loop Corrective Actionahmad bassiouny
Ìý
The document discusses closed-loop corrective action (CLCA), which is a process for identifying problems, determining their root causes, developing and implementing solutions to prevent recurrence, and verifying the effectiveness of the solutions. It covers determining the cause of issues, deciding if and what type of corrective action is needed, implementing and tracking corrective actions, handling customer complaints, and ensuring the actions address the root causes. Software tools are available to help facilitate tracking the CLCA process.Implementation
Implementation4goggas
Ìý
There are several reasons why information systems may fail or succeed during implementation. Systems can fail during analysis due to poor definition of objectives or insufficient user involvement. During design, systems may fail if users are not involved or flexibility is not considered. Programming errors can occur if development time is underestimated or documentation is lacking. Testing failures happen without proper test plans or user involvement in acceptance. Conversion issues arise when training and documentation are inadequate. Successful implementation involves user motivation, training, and involvement throughout; managing complexity; and having management support.Production analysis application_ SM Infocomm
Production analysis application_ SM Infocommmukul soni
Ìý
SM Infocom proposes a Production Analysis Application (PAA) to address challenges with complex production projects including time delays in addressing issues, a lack of insights from large amounts of data, and overreliance on manual processes. The PAA would consolidate production data from machines in real-time, perform analyses, and generate customizable reports to facilitate preventative action, improve resource utilization, reduce downtime, and increase output quality. Benefits of the PAA include real-time solutions, increased productivity and efficiency, better planning and forecasting, and reduced production costs.Aspect Oriented Programming - AOP/AOSD
Aspect Oriented Programming - AOP/AOSDCan R. PAHALI
Ìý
Contents
21.1 The separation of concerns
21.2 Aspects, join points, and pointcuts
21.3 Software engineering with aspectsSimilar to System Reliability & Availability Modeling with Weibull Learning Objectives (3) (20)
Fundamentals of software development
Fundamentals of software developmentPratik Devmurari
Ìý
The document provides an overview of fundamentals of software development including definitions of software, characteristics of software, software engineering, layered approach to software engineering, need for software engineering, and common software development life cycle models. It describes system software and application software. It outlines characteristics like understandability, cost, maintainability, modularity, reliability, portability, documentation, reusability, and interoperability. It also defines software engineering, layered approach, and need for software engineering. Finally, it explains popular life cycle models like waterfall, iterative waterfall, prototyping, spiral, and RAD models.Dev ops developer (session 3)
Dev ops developer (session 3)MSDEVMTL
Ìý
What is DevOps? It’s a fairly hot term in today’s application development and operations space,but there are many different definitions as to what DevOps really is. Ultimately, DevOps is abouthow teams build software, deploy software and maintain it throughout its lifecycle. There is nosingle, right answer to the question, but there are a number of tools and strategies that can helpcustomers adopt a winning DevOps process that allows dev and operations teams to moreproductive together.In this session, the audience will learn what DevOps is at a high level, provide strategies for howto implement a DevOps process that fits their organization’s needs and how the MicrosoftApplication Lifecycle Management (ALM) tooling can help with this. As part of the session,attendees can expect to learn how to set up the Microsoft ALM stack for their teams and how touse it effectively in their software development lifecycle, regardless of the role each individual plays on the team.IRJET - Recommendations Engine with Multi-Objective Contextual Bandits (U...
IRJET - Recommendations Engine with Multi-Objective Contextual Bandits (U...IRJET Journal
Ìý
This document describes a recommendation engine for e-commerce that uses reinforcement learning and multi-objective contextual bandits to satisfy both user and stakeholder needs. It aims to optimize fairness and relevance in recommendations. The system uses reinforcement mechanisms, naive Bayesian classification, clustering, and filtering algorithms to recommend products to users based on their preferences and browsing history. This helps users make informed decisions and increases sales and transactions for stakeholders. The system aims to address cold start problems and changing user preferences over time.SE18_Lec 03_ RUP
SE18_Lec 03_ RUPAmr E. Mohamed
Ìý
The document describes the Rational Unified Process (RUP), a generic iterative software development process. RUP brings together aspects of other generic process models and can be described from dynamic, static, and practice perspectives. It consists of four main phases - Inception, Elaboration, Construction, and Transition - with both in-phase and cross-phase iterations. Key principles of RUP include iterative development, managing requirements, using component-based architectures, modeling software visually, verifying quality, and controlling changes.Build for the future
Build for the futureMostafa Elfeky
Ìý
Describing our vision to enhance development process in five steps.
1- Build basic modules and wrap them with a set of startup-projects
2- Enhance already built and running project.
3- Define standard, specification and guidelines.
4- Achieve software quality factors
5- Define learning path.School management system
School management systemSoumya Behera
Ìý
The document describes a presentation for a school management system created by Soumya Subhadarshi Behera. The presentation includes an introduction, motivation, and system development sections. It provides background on the need for a school management system to efficiently manage student, employee, academic and other administrative data. It then covers the goals and components involved in developing the software system, including using Visual Basic 6.0 for the front end and Oracle for the back end database.cis 510 Focus Dreams/newtonhelp.com
cis 510 Focus Dreams/newtonhelp.combellflower88
Ìý
For more course tutorials visit
www.newtonhelp.com
This Tutorial contains 2 Papers for each Assignment
CIS 510 Week 2 Assignment 1 Error Handling in an Activity Diagram (2 Papers)
CIS 510 Week 4 Assignment 2 Assignment 2 Creating a Use Case (2 Papers)
cis 510 Imagine Your Future/newtonhelp.comÌý Ìý
cis 510 Imagine Your Future/newtonhelp.comÌý Ìýbellflower48
Ìý
For more course tutorials visit
www.newtonhelp.com
This Tutorial contains 2 Papers for each Assignment
CIS 510 Week 2 Assignment 1 Error Handling in an Activity Diagram (2 Papers)
CIS 510 Week 4 Assignment 2 Assignment 2 Creating a Use Case (2 Papers)
cis 510 Life of the Mind/newtonhelp.comÌý Ìý
cis 510 Life of the Mind/newtonhelp.comÌý Ìýbellflower6
Ìý
For more course tutorials visit
www.newtonhelp.com
This Tutorial contains 2 Papers for each Assignment
CIS 510 Week 2 Assignment 1 Error Handling in an Activity Diagram (2 Papers)
CIS 510 Week 4 Assignment 2 Assignment 2 Creating a Use Case (2 Papers)
generic-software-process-models.ppt
generic-software-process-models.pptAayush847388
Ìý
The document discusses several software process models including the waterfall model, evolutionary development, formal transformation, and reuse-based development. It then provides more details on the waterfall model and prototyping model. The waterfall model separates development into distinct phases like requirements, design, implementation, testing, and maintenance. The prototyping model emphasizes early prototypes for feedback. The document also discusses the spiral model which combines prototyping and waterfall elements and is used for large, complex projects.B Fn As
B Fn AsSangwon Ko
Ìý
- The document discusses challenges in building application frameworks and applications simultaneously. It argues that the framework must be built in parallel with the applications that will use it.
- It presents patterns for developing frameworks and applications together, including starting with pilot applications to help define the framework's abstractions, and evolving the framework based on feedback from application developers.
- Metrics like the "Rule of Three" and "Budget Factor 2.5" are introduced to help scope the framework and schedule its development.From use case to software architecture
From use case to software architectureAhmad karawash
Ìý
The document discusses use cases and software architecture. It provides an overview of use cases, their benefits, and challenges. It then discusses how use cases relate to software architecture and different architectural views. The document proposes a methodology for developing use cases with 12 steps, including defining the system boundary, prioritizing use cases, describing use cases, and knowing when to stop. It also discusses challenges with complex use cases and proposes a technique called "use case chains" to reduce complexity.SOFTWARE BUILD AUTOMATION TOOLS A COMPARATIVE STUDY BETWEEN MAVEN, GRADLE, BA...
SOFTWARE BUILD AUTOMATION TOOLS A COMPARATIVE STUDY BETWEEN MAVEN, GRADLE, BA...ijseajournal
Ìý
The automated processes will play an increasingly vital role in continuous integration as the pace of
design and development of new software picks up. With the importance of software build automation tools
taking centerstage, the present paper undertakes a comparative analysis of three best available solutions -
Maven, Gradle and Bazel. We aim to evaluate the solutions based on their efficiency and performance in
the context of software build automation and deployment. There are some fundamental differences in the
way each tools approach builds. The aim of this study is also to provide the reader with a complete
overview of the selected build automation tools and, the relevant features and capabilities of interest. In
addition, the paper leads to a broader view on the future of the build automation tools ecosystem.
CIS 510 Inspiring Innovation/tutorialrank.com
CIS 510 Inspiring Innovation/tutorialrank.comjonhson113
Ìý
For more course tutorials visit
www.tutorialrank.com
CIS 510 Week 2 Assignment 1 Error Handling in an Activity Diagram (2 Papers)
CIS 510 Week 4 Assignment 2 Assignment 2 Creating a Use Case (2 Papers)
CIS 510 Week 7 Assignment 3 Creating a Domain Model Class Diagram (2 Papers)
CIS 510 Week 9 Assignment 4 Diversity of Approaches (2 Papers)
CIS 510 Week 10 Technical Paper Final Project Plan (2 Papers)
Applying sys ml_with_magicdraw
Applying sys ml_with_magicdrawelheshk
Ìý
This document provides an overview and summary of a free mini course on applying SysML with MagicDraw modeling software. The summary includes:
1) SysML is a modeling language developed by OMG and INCOSE for modeling complex systems, including hardware, software, and other system aspects. It includes 9 different diagram types.
2) The course teaches how to use SysML and MagicDraw for various system modeling tasks including requirements analysis, structural decomposition, behavior modeling, and more.
3) The course is taught by an experienced instructor and provides an overview of MagicDraw features to help students learn and apply effective modeling techniques.
B2 2006 sizing_benchmarking
B2 2006 sizing_benchmarkingSteve Feldman
Ìý
The document summarizes the results of benchmarking tests performed on the Blackboard Academic Suite to determine system sizing requirements. Key findings include:
- Tests showed a Unicode conversion taking minutes for small datasets, hours for moderate, and under 3 days for large datasets, meeting objectives.
- Regression performance from version 6.3 to 7.X met the objective of no more than a 5% degradation and potential for a 5% improvement.
- Benchmarking of different hardware platforms like Sun, Dell, and Windows showed performance varied based on configuration.B2 2006 sizing_benchmarking (1)
B2 2006 sizing_benchmarking (1)Steve Feldman
Ìý
The document discusses how Blackboard sizes its Academic Suite software based on benchmarking. It provides details on the benchmarking methodology, including modeling user behavior, data growth, and performance objectives. The results showed how the software performed under different workload levels on various hardware configurations. The last part discusses using the benchmark results and sizing guide to determine an institution's adoption profile and appropriate hardware configuration based on factors like sessions per hour and page loads.Agile2015 short paper presentation: Development of Complex Software with Agil...
Agile2015 short paper presentation: Development of Complex Software with Agil...Alan Braz
Ìý
Agile Software Development (ASD) has been on mainstream through methodologies such as XP and Scrum enabling them to be applied in the development of complex and reliable software systems. This paper is the end result of the Master’s dissertation of the main author, and proposes a solution to guide the development of complex systems based on components by adding exceptional behavior modeling practices to Scrum, resulting in the Scrum+CE method (Scrum with Exceptional Behavior).
In order to evaluate the proposed method, a synthetic controlled experiment was conducted with three groups.We compared the efficiency of the new process in relation to plain Scrum and the results were the production of a better quality software but with less features implemented during the same amount of time.System Reliability & Availability Modeling with Weibull Learning Objectives (3)
- 1. System Reliability & Availability Modeling with Weibull Learning Objectives Day 1: Apply Weibull Analysis to a variety of data types Recall the history of Weibull and state its importance in analyzing equipment failures Small group discussion of applications for Weibull in current facilities Identify the three Weibull parameters Small group exercise relating Weibull shapes to maintenance strategies Calculate Reliability using the three Weibull Parameters Individual Exercises calculating Reliability, Unreliability, and Cumulative Probability of Failure Determine Weibull parameters Individual exercise to Determine Weibull parameters using Weibull Graph Paper Individual Exercise to Determine Weibull parameters using Microsoft Excel Individual Exercise to Determine Weibull parameters using commercial software Measure Reliability Growth and predict future number of failures Individual Exercise to Create Reliability Growth Plots Using Excel Software Build and interpret Process Reliability Plots Individual Exercise to Create and interpret a Process Reliability Plot using commercial software Construct a data recording system to enhance Weibull Analysis Small Group Discussion/Exercise creating a list of activities to do upon returning to your facility Day 2: Build a basic understanding of Availability Modeling & Its Use State the uses of Availability Modeling throughout a system's life-cycle Small group exercise to discuss using Availability Modeling at attendees facilities Build a Reliability Block Diagram Individual exercise to create a simple RBD Small Group exercise to create a complex RBD Calculate System Reliability Individual Exercise to calculate reliability of a series system Individual exercise to calculate reliability of a simple redundant relationship Individual exercise to calculate reliability of a complex system Interpret results of an Availability Model Small group exercise to build and interpret modeling results from a simple system model Optional Day 3: Perform advanced modeling activities using a simulation software package Build a model of a complex system using commercial software Create basic model tables Create an RBD of a complex system Create failure models for each block Assign failure consequences Interpret the output of the model and make recommendations for system or maintenance strategy improvements Goal for the Day Learning Objectives Learning Activities