This document discusses the military dimensions of India's rise as a global power. It notes that while India spends billions on modernizing its military, there are still institutional impediments holding it back. Major military acquisitions seem driven by prestige and technology transfer rather than strategic needs. There is an urgent need for India to conduct a national strategic review to define its security priorities and overhaul its institutions and procedures in order to fully realize its military potential on the global stage.
2. INTRODUCTION
In our rapidly changing world, which is witnessing a
major diffusion in wealth and power from west to
east.
The first and most immediately identifiable form of
power is a nation’s military strength.
3. The numbers and characteristics of
infantry battalions, fleets of vessels
and columns of tanks seem to provide
clear, straightforward, and easily
quantifiable indicators of a country’s
growing clout.
4. To study military power, we therefore
need to examine the interwoven
human, institutional and doctrinal
aspects which undergird the manner in
which military resources are both
procured and used.
5. GUILT OF RESOURCES, LACK OF
FOCUS?
Stockholm International Peace Research
Institute (SIPRI) states that India is now the
largest weapons importer in the world.
Studies indicate that India may spend up to $80
billion on military modernisation by 2015.
6. Currently made weapon deals
? $20 billion deal to purchase 126 multi-role
fighter.
? 40 ships and submarines on order, including
aircraft carriers, large amphibious assault
vessels, and nuclear submarines.
7. Indian Army is modernising at a rapid pace
in certain niche areas, such as missile and
mechanised warfare, but the average jawan
remains poorly equipped, armed with antiquated
assault rifles which frequently fail to operate
effectively in the harsh mountainous conditions
that characterise India’s disputed borders.
8. Indian Air Force, which has since independence
interiorised the British Royal Air Force’s cult of
the fighter pilot, tends to inordinately favour
flight capabilities and air dominance over ground
support and weapons packages.
Navy’s strongly carrier-centric focus has led it to
systematically neglect anti-submarine warfare and
sea denial in favour of sea control and soft power
projection.
9. Major acquisitions seem all too
often to be driven by the quest for
prestige, the desire for technology
transfer or by deep- seated
institutional preferences.
10. THE INSTITUTIONALISED
IMPEDIMENTS TO INDIA’S
MILITARY RISE
India’s post-independence leaders
rigorously implemented tight
bureaucratic control of the nation’s
armed forces.
12. IN SEARCH OF STRATEGY
The country is in urgent need of a
comprehensive National Strategic Review
which clearly lays out threat assessments,
while articulating India’s needs and
priorities.
13. In a depressing display of
inefficiency, a combined $5.5
billion worth of procurement
funds were returned, unspent, to
the Ministry of Defence’s
treasury, from 2002 to 2008.
14. CONCLUSION
India’s military modernisation finds itself at a
critical juncture. New Delhi faces numerous external
and internal challenges.
In order to fulfil its global aspirations India will need to
engage in a transformational overhaul of its institutions
and procedures.