Terry Zink of Microsoft's presentation from Virus Bulletin 2014 in Seattle - Using DMARC to Improve Your Email Reputation.
1 of 28
More Related Content
Using DMARC to Improve Your Email Reputation
2. 1. The problem
2. How does DMARC work?
3. The unexpected upside of DMARC
4. The unexpected downside of DMARC
5. Case study
6. Conclusion
3. 1. The problem
2. How does DMARC work?
3. The unexpected upside of DMARC
4. The unexpected downside of DMARC
5. Case study
6. Conclusion
4. Toms a pilot for Zinko Airlines. He flies
mostly commercial passenger jets but
occasionally he does private jets in his
spare time.
Hes a very responsible pilot. He reads
his manifests, checks the weather and
forecasts ahead of time, and ensures
that people have a smooth flight. He
gets weather alerts every morning.
ZA I R L I N E S
inko
5. Zinko Air Weather
Alerts
Weather Alert for Sept 25, 2014
Thu 9/25, 5:30 am
To: tzink@zinkoairlines.com
Zinko
A I R L I N E S
Your daily weather alert is
below:
Login to view your customized
weather report
Zinko Airlines | Privacy |
Oceanic Airlines | Privacy |
Terms of Use | Unsubscribe
One day, Tom gets an email from
Zinko Airliness daily weather alert
service.
He clicks the link to go to the
companys internal website where
they have the daily schedule and
weather information.
6. ZA I R L I N E S
inko
Zinko Air Weather
Alerts
Corporate Weather Alert for sign Sept 25, in
2014
Thu 9/25, 5:30 am
user@tzink@zinkoairlines.com
com
To: tzink@zinkoairlines.com
ZPassword
inko
A I R L I N E S
Sign in
Your daily weather alert is
below:
Login to view your customized
weather report
Zinko Airlines | Privacy |
Oceanic Airlines | Privacy |
Terms of Use | Unsubscribe
? 2014 Zinko Airlines
zinkoairlines.phpforms.net/q1xfr4
Close, but not
the right URL!
He enters in his information to login
and receives a login failure. He is
directed back to the companys web
page where he logs in again.
But the damage has been done.
Tom has been fooled into
surrendering his login credentials to
a phisher.
7. 1. Looks like the real thing
2. Hard for users to notice anything that is off
3. Traditional anti-spam techniques dont work
8. 1. Looks like the real thing
2. Hard for users to notice anything that is off
3. Traditional anti-spam techniques dont work
Anti-abuse techniques usually focus on the filter to sort out good email from spam;
however, phishing has the following characteristics:
a) Sent from IP addresses and/or domains that dont have previous bad reputation
b) Domains may authenticate with SPF or DKIM but this is hidden from the user
c) Even the 5322.From may be hidden from the user, depending on the email
client
9. 1. The problem
2. How does DMARC work?
3. The unexpected upside of DMARC
4. The unexpected downside of DMARC
5. Case study
6. Conclusion
10. Zinko Air Weather
Alerts
Weather Alert for Sept 25, 2014
Thu 9/25, 5:30 am
To: tzink@zinkoairlines.com
Zinko
A I R L I N E S
Your daily weather alert is
below:
Login to view your customized
weather report
Oceanic Airlines | Privacy |
Terms of Use | Unsubscribe
Yes.
Yes.
No
Zinko Airlines | Privacy |
11. 1. The problem
2. How does DMARC work?
3. The unexpected upside of DMARC
4. The unexpected downside of DMARC
5. Case study
6. Conclusion
14. s
Mail filter
1. Spammer on the Internet
sends an email spoofing
joe@example.com 2. Message does not pass
DKIM or SPF, fails DMARC,
mark message as spam
3. Send a notification back
to dmarc_failures@example.com
4. Admins at example.com investigate
the spammer Hmm, someone is
spoofing me!
15. Mail filter
1. joe@example.com sends a
message from a new set of servers
2. Message does not pass
DKIM or SPF, fails DMARC
3. Send a notification back
to dmarc_failures@example.com
4. Oops, I forgot to add this
machine s IPs to my SPF record,
and forgot to enable DKIM.
16. Mail filter
1. 3rd party mail server sends MAIL
FROM alerts@3rdParty.com, From:
alerts@example.com 2. Message passes SPF and DKIM,
but RFC5321 MailFrom does not
match RFC 5322 From
3. Send a notification back
to dmarc_failures@example.com
3rd party mail server
4. Oops, I forgot to delegate a
subdomain to this 3rd party mailer
like Terry Zink explained on his blog.
17. 1. The problem
2. How does DMARC work?
3. The unexpected upside of DMARC
4. The unexpected downside of DMARC
5. Case study
6. Conclusion
18. In chess strategy, there is a rule C
always protect the queen. The reason
is that your queen is your most
powerful piece. It can attack in any
direction and any player that loses his
or her queen greatly weakens his
position.
If you have a strategy where you might
lose your queen it is usually wise to
fallback to a less risky strategy where
you can retain it.
Image taken from Flickr Creative Commons: https://www.flickr.com/photos/dlkinney/357134468/
19. Yet in chess, there are times when it
makes perfect sense to sacrifice your
queen C when you can increase the
strength of your own position relative
to your opponents.
If you make him or her weaker than
you make yourself, it is a net positive;
its even a good thing to lose your
queen! There are no hard-and-fast
rules in chess.
20. DMARC is the same. In general, you
will always want to authenticate your
email and most of the time when it fails
DMARC, it is malicious. This is true
most of the time, but not always.
Just like in chess, losing your queen is
not always a bad thing, in email failing
DMARC is not always because a
domain is being spoofed maliciously.
21. Case 1: SPF only
works if the message
originates here
and is slightly
modified here,
DMARC can break
Case 2: If the message
originates here
22. Case 1: SPF only
works if the message
originates here
and is slightly
modified here,
DMARC can break
Occurs all the time with legitimate mailing lists, still
being worked out by the DMARC working group.
Case 2: If the message
originates here
23. 1. The problem
2. How does DMARC work?
3. The unexpected upside of DMARC
4. The unexpected downside of DMARC
5. Case study
6. Conclusion
25. Step 1 C Microsoft decided how to receive DMARC reports (used a 3rd party)
Step 2 C Published a DMARC record
Step 3 C Sorted through the DMARC reports for IPs that are used for corporate traffic
Step 4 C Sorted through the DMARC reports for IPs that are internal to the company but
failing authentication
Step 5 C Sorted through the DMARC reports for IPs that are external to the company
and failing authentication.
26. Step 6 C Got all the internal teams to properly authenticate email (about 30 of them)
Step 7 C Updated DKIM keys
Step 8 C Update the SPF record to a hard fail, now more difficult for spammers to spoof
Microsoft
Step 9 C Next: Publish a DMARC record of p=quarantine
27. 1. DMARC solves one aspect of phishing
2. DMARC lets domains be more secure
3. But, DMARC still has challenges that are not yet solved
28. ? 2014 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved. Microsoft, Windows, Windows Vista and other product names are or may be registered trademarks and/or trademarks in the U.S. and/or other countries.
The information herein is for informational purposes only and represents the current view of Microsoft Corporation as of the date of this presentation. Because Microsoft must respond to changing market conditions, it should not be interpreted to be a commitment on the part of Microsoft, and
Microsoft cannot guarantee the accuracy of any information provided after the date of this presentation. MICROSOFT MAKES NO WARRANTIES, EXPRESS, IMPLIED OR STATUTORY, AS TO THE INFORMATION IN THIS PRESENTATION.
Editor's Notes
Solid background, with 1 box highlight
Meet Jack. Hes a pilot for Oceanic Airlines. He flies mostly commercial passenger jets but occasionally he does private jets in his spare time. Hes a very responsible pilot. He reads his manifests, checks the weather and forecasts ahead of time, and ensures that people have a smooth flight. He gets weather alerts every morning.
One day, Jack gets an email from Oceanic Airliness daily weather alert service. He clicks the link to go to the companys internal website where they have the daily schedule and weather information. He enters in his information to login and receives a login failure. He is directed back to the companys web page where he logs in again.Jack has just become a victim of a spear phishing attack.
Users are tricked into believing What you see is all there is (Kahneman and Tvetsky)
Very difficult to inspect on mobile devices which frequently hide the domain; Hover to uncover not available, Looking at the base URL often encodes the target into the abusive URL
Anti-abuse techniques usually focus on the filter which is reliable and predictable, rather than the user who is not
Sent from IP addresses and/or domains that dont have previous bad reputation
Domains may authenticate with SPF or DKIM but this is hidden from the user
Even the 5322.From may be hidden from the user, depending on the email client
Image taken from Flickr Creative Commons: https://www.flickr.com/photos/dlkinney/357134468/
In chess strategy, there is a rule C always protect the queen. The reason is that your queen is your most powerful piece. It can attack in any direction and any player that loses his or her queen greatly weakens his position. If you have a strategy where you might lose your queen it is usually wise to fallback to a less risky strategy where you can retain it. Yet in chess, there are times when it makes perfect sense to sacrifice your queen C when you can increase the strength of your own position relative to your opponents. If you make him or her weaker than you make yourself, it is a net positive; its even a good thing to lose your queen! There are no hard-and-fast rules in chess.
DMARC is the same. In general, you will always want to authenticate your email and most of the time when it fails DMARC, it is malicious. This is true most of the time, but not always. Just like in chess, losing your queen is not always a bad thing, in email failing DMARC is not always because a domain is being spoofed maliciously.
Image taken from Flickr Creative Commons: https://www.flickr.com/photos/dlkinney/357134468/
In chess strategy, there is a rule C always protect the queen. The reason is that your queen is your most powerful piece. It can attack in any direction and any player that loses his or her queen greatly weakens his position. If you have a strategy where you might lose your queen it is usually wise to fallback to a less risky strategy where you can retain it. Yet in chess, there are times when it makes perfect sense to sacrifice your queen C when you can increase the strength of your own position relative to your opponents. If you make him or her weaker than you make yourself, it is a net positive; its even a good thing to lose your queen! There are no hard-and-fast rules in chess.
DMARC is the same. In general, you will always want to authenticate your email and most of the time when it fails DMARC, it is malicious. This is true most of the time, but not always. Just like in chess, losing your queen is not always a bad thing, in email failing DMARC is not always because a domain is being spoofed maliciously.
Image taken from Flickr Creative Commons: https://www.flickr.com/photos/dlkinney/357134468/
In chess strategy, there is a rule C always protect the queen. The reason is that your queen is your most powerful piece. It can attack in any direction and any player that loses his or her queen greatly weakens his position. If you have a strategy where you might lose your queen it is usually wise to fallback to a less risky strategy where you can retain it. Yet in chess, there are times when it makes perfect sense to sacrifice your queen C when you can increase the strength of your own position relative to your opponents. If you make him or her weaker than you make yourself, it is a net positive; its even a good thing to lose your queen! There are no hard-and-fast rules in chess.
DMARC is the same. In general, you will always want to authenticate your email and most of the time when it fails DMARC, it is malicious. This is true most of the time, but not always. Just like in chess, losing your queen is not always a bad thing, in email failing DMARC is not always because a domain is being spoofed maliciously.
Step 1 C Decide how to receive DMARC reports
Step 2 C Publish a DMARC record
Step 3 C Sort through the DMARC reports for IPs that are used for corporate traffic
Step 4 C Sort through the DMARC reports for IPs that are internal to the company but failing authentication
Step 5 C Sort through the DMARC reports for IPs that are external to the company and failing authentication
Step 6 C Update DKIM keys
Step 7 C Update the SPF record to a hard fail
Step 8 C Publish a DMARC record of p=quarantine
Step 1 C Decide how to receive DMARC reports
Step 2 C Publish a DMARC record
Step 3 C Sort through the DMARC reports for IPs that are used for corporate traffic
Step 4 C Sort through the DMARC reports for IPs that are internal to the company but failing authentication
Step 5 C Sort through the DMARC reports for IPs that are external to the company and failing authentication
Step 6 C Update DKIM keys
Step 7 C Update the SPF record to a hard fail
Step 8 C Publish a DMARC record of p=quarantine
Step 1 C Decide how to receive DMARC reports
Step 2 C Publish a DMARC record
Step 3 C Sort through the DMARC reports for IPs that are used for corporate traffic
Step 4 C Sort through the DMARC reports for IPs that are internal to the company but failing authentication
Step 5 C Sort through the DMARC reports for IPs that are external to the company and failing authentication
Step 6 C Update DKIM keys
Step 7 C Update the SPF record to a hard fail
Step 8 C Publish a DMARC record of p=quarantine
Step 1 C Decide how to receive DMARC reports
Step 2 C Publish a DMARC record
Step 3 C Sort through the DMARC reports for IPs that are used for corporate traffic
Step 4 C Sort through the DMARC reports for IPs that are internal to the company but failing authentication
Step 5 C Sort through the DMARC reports for IPs that are external to the company and failing authentication
Step 6 C Update DKIM keys
Step 7 C Update the SPF record to a hard fail
Step 8 C Publish a DMARC record of p=quarantine