際際滷

際際滷Share a Scribd company logo
THE ART OF DEBATING
WHAT IS ILSS?
 The International Law Students Society, shortly
  the ILSS, is founded at the Department of Law in
  Joensuu at the University of Eastern Finland.
 The ILSS is addressed to foreign or international
  students of law at the Department.
 The most fundamental purpose of the ILSS is to
  organize scientific events, carry out the research
  in the law and similar areas of science and
  integrate a group of foreign or international
  students of law in Joensuu.
WHAT IS ILSS?
The ILSS organizes, especially in the field of the law research, but also
  in similar areas of science such as economy, politics, history,
  sociology, philosophy, theology, culture and so on:
 Joensuu Debates Club based on the British format debates idea,
 seminars,
 lectures,
 reading groups,
 another events,
 official, organizational, and unofficial meetings.

 The ILSS is open for everybody who wants to participate in the ILSS
  activity.
 The ILSS is an open society also in this sense that any new forms of
  activity are required.
http://www.facebook.com/
  groups/joensuudebates

        JOIN US!
Debates
WHAT IS DEBATING?
Debates
Debates
Debates
OUR COLLEAGUES

TURKU
http://www.facebook.com/UtuDebate
HELSINKI
http://www.facebook.com/helsinkidebating
http://www.facebook.com/AaltoDebatingSociety
TAMPERE
http://www.facebook.com/groups/utadebatesociety
WHY DEBATING?
 Become a part of a large, welcoming social
  network of debaters, the easy way to make
  friends     at    university,  especially  for
  international students.
 Think critically when analyzing arguments.
 Learn the proper structure of arguments to
  improve your academic progress
 Gain the ability to speak persuasively
 Get the chance to travel to different
  tournaments, have fun at socials after day of
  tense debating and just meet new people.
SPEAKERS
   Prime Minister
   Leader of the Opposition
   Deputy Prime Minister
   Deputy Leader of the Opposition
   Member for the Government
   Member for the Opposition
   Government Whip
   Opposition Whip
Opening factions
    The first faction on each Government and Opposition
    team, known as the Opening Factions, has four basic roles
    in a British Parliamentary debate.
                            They must:
   Define the motion of the debate.
   Present their case.
   Respond to arguments of the opposing first faction.
   Maintain their relevance during the debate.
   The Opening Government team has the semi-divine right of
    definition, preventing the opposition from challenging their
    definition of the motion unless it is either a truism or
    clearly unreasonable.
Closing factions
    The first faction on each Government and Opposition team,
    known as the Opening Factions, has four basic roles in a
    British Parliamentary debate.
                            They must:
   Define the motion of the debate.
   Present their case.
   Respond to arguments of the opposing first faction.
   Maintain their relevance during the debate.
   The Opening Government team has the semi-divine right of
    definition, preventing the opposition from challenging their
    definition of the motion unless it is either a truism or
    clearly unreasonable.
Second factions
 The role of the second two factions are to:
 Introduce a case extension.
 Establish and maintain their relevance early in
  the debate.
 Respond to the arguments of the first factions.
 Respond to the case extension of the
  opposing second faction.
The role of whips
 They must respond to both opposing
factions' arguments;
 They should briefly sum up their
Opening Faction's case;
 They should offer a conclusion of
their own faction's case extension
Points of information (POI)
POI allows the first two factions to maintain
 their relevance during the course of the
 debate, and the last two factions to introduce
 their arguments early in the debate.
   The first and last minute of each speech is
 considered "protected time", during which no
 points of information may be offered.
Preparation time
 Brainstorm ideas
 Discuss arguments with
 partner
 Distribute arguments
 Think of reaction from
the opponents and invent
contrarguments
THIS HOUSE BELIEVES THAT=Motion
                       Preparation time=15 mins



Prime Minister                   Opposition Leader

Model for the reform             Opposing model
Why status quo is bad and why    Why status-quo should be
we need changes?                 saved?
Which major interests and
what major actors can be         2 CONTRARGUMENTS+2 NEW
affected by introducing the      ARGUMENTS
motion?

2 NEW ARGUMENTS
Deputy Prime Minister   Deputy Opposition Leader

2 SUPPORTS (of the    2 SUPPORTS+2
arguments of Prime    CONTRARGUMENTS+1
Minister)+2           NEW ARGUMENT
CONTRARGUMENTS
(arguments against
arguments of opposing
party)+1 NEW ARGUMENT
Member for the             Member for the
Government                 Opposition


SUPPORT+CONTRARGUME        SUPPORT+CONTRARGUME
NTATION+EXTENSION          NTATION+EXTENSION
(argument which looks at   (argument which looks at
the problem from unusual   the problem from unusual
side of view)              side of view)
Government Whip                Opposition Whip

Summing         up       the   Summing         up       the
arguments, sorting them        arguments, sorting them
by the points of clash         by the points of clash
(most provocative and          (most provocative and
serious issues raised in the   serious issues raised in the
debate, 3-4 points of clash)   debate, 3-4 points of clash)
and proving how the            and proving how the
arguments        of      the   arguments        of      the
government were stronger       opposition were stronger
 THE JUDGE`s VERDICT (5-10 mins are given for
      judge to think before making verdict)
READ MORE

http://idebate.org
 Debatabase
http://idebate.org/content/about-debatabase
 Main ideas about what debating is
http://idebate.org/about/debate
 Neill Harvey Smith. Practical guide to debating
http://debate.uvm.edu/dcpdf/Neill_Harvey_Smith_Practic
  al_Guide_to_Debating_Worlds_Style_2011.pdf
 Steven Johnson. Winning debates. A Guide to Debating in
  the Style of the World Universities Debating
  Championships
http://debate.uvm.edu/dcpdf/Steven_Johnson_Winning_D
  ebates_2009.pdf
 Short guide into debating made by one of debating
  societies
http://aberdebating.org/wp-
  content/uploads/2012/05/dfn.pdf?9d7bd4

More Related Content

Debates

  • 1. THE ART OF DEBATING
  • 2. WHAT IS ILSS? The International Law Students Society, shortly the ILSS, is founded at the Department of Law in Joensuu at the University of Eastern Finland. The ILSS is addressed to foreign or international students of law at the Department. The most fundamental purpose of the ILSS is to organize scientific events, carry out the research in the law and similar areas of science and integrate a group of foreign or international students of law in Joensuu.
  • 3. WHAT IS ILSS? The ILSS organizes, especially in the field of the law research, but also in similar areas of science such as economy, politics, history, sociology, philosophy, theology, culture and so on: Joensuu Debates Club based on the British format debates idea, seminars, lectures, reading groups, another events, official, organizational, and unofficial meetings. The ILSS is open for everybody who wants to participate in the ILSS activity. The ILSS is an open society also in this sense that any new forms of activity are required.
  • 11. WHY DEBATING? Become a part of a large, welcoming social network of debaters, the easy way to make friends at university, especially for international students. Think critically when analyzing arguments. Learn the proper structure of arguments to improve your academic progress Gain the ability to speak persuasively Get the chance to travel to different tournaments, have fun at socials after day of tense debating and just meet new people.
  • 12. SPEAKERS Prime Minister Leader of the Opposition Deputy Prime Minister Deputy Leader of the Opposition Member for the Government Member for the Opposition Government Whip Opposition Whip
  • 13. Opening factions The first faction on each Government and Opposition team, known as the Opening Factions, has four basic roles in a British Parliamentary debate. They must: Define the motion of the debate. Present their case. Respond to arguments of the opposing first faction. Maintain their relevance during the debate. The Opening Government team has the semi-divine right of definition, preventing the opposition from challenging their definition of the motion unless it is either a truism or clearly unreasonable.
  • 14. Closing factions The first faction on each Government and Opposition team, known as the Opening Factions, has four basic roles in a British Parliamentary debate. They must: Define the motion of the debate. Present their case. Respond to arguments of the opposing first faction. Maintain their relevance during the debate. The Opening Government team has the semi-divine right of definition, preventing the opposition from challenging their definition of the motion unless it is either a truism or clearly unreasonable.
  • 15. Second factions The role of the second two factions are to: Introduce a case extension. Establish and maintain their relevance early in the debate. Respond to the arguments of the first factions. Respond to the case extension of the opposing second faction.
  • 16. The role of whips They must respond to both opposing factions' arguments; They should briefly sum up their Opening Faction's case; They should offer a conclusion of their own faction's case extension
  • 17. Points of information (POI) POI allows the first two factions to maintain their relevance during the course of the debate, and the last two factions to introduce their arguments early in the debate. The first and last minute of each speech is considered "protected time", during which no points of information may be offered.
  • 18. Preparation time Brainstorm ideas Discuss arguments with partner Distribute arguments Think of reaction from the opponents and invent contrarguments
  • 19. THIS HOUSE BELIEVES THAT=Motion Preparation time=15 mins Prime Minister Opposition Leader Model for the reform Opposing model Why status quo is bad and why Why status-quo should be we need changes? saved? Which major interests and what major actors can be 2 CONTRARGUMENTS+2 NEW affected by introducing the ARGUMENTS motion? 2 NEW ARGUMENTS
  • 20. Deputy Prime Minister Deputy Opposition Leader 2 SUPPORTS (of the 2 SUPPORTS+2 arguments of Prime CONTRARGUMENTS+1 Minister)+2 NEW ARGUMENT CONTRARGUMENTS (arguments against arguments of opposing party)+1 NEW ARGUMENT
  • 21. Member for the Member for the Government Opposition SUPPORT+CONTRARGUME SUPPORT+CONTRARGUME NTATION+EXTENSION NTATION+EXTENSION (argument which looks at (argument which looks at the problem from unusual the problem from unusual side of view) side of view)
  • 22. Government Whip Opposition Whip Summing up the Summing up the arguments, sorting them arguments, sorting them by the points of clash by the points of clash (most provocative and (most provocative and serious issues raised in the serious issues raised in the debate, 3-4 points of clash) debate, 3-4 points of clash) and proving how the and proving how the arguments of the arguments of the government were stronger opposition were stronger THE JUDGE`s VERDICT (5-10 mins are given for judge to think before making verdict)
  • 24. Debatabase http://idebate.org/content/about-debatabase Main ideas about what debating is http://idebate.org/about/debate Neill Harvey Smith. Practical guide to debating http://debate.uvm.edu/dcpdf/Neill_Harvey_Smith_Practic al_Guide_to_Debating_Worlds_Style_2011.pdf Steven Johnson. Winning debates. A Guide to Debating in the Style of the World Universities Debating Championships http://debate.uvm.edu/dcpdf/Steven_Johnson_Winning_D ebates_2009.pdf Short guide into debating made by one of debating societies http://aberdebating.org/wp- content/uploads/2012/05/dfn.pdf?9d7bd4