際際滷

際際滷Share a Scribd company logo
Payne v Tennessee
501 US 808 (1991)
Facts of the case
 Pervis Tyrone Payne spent an early afternoon binge drinking and injecting
cocaine
 Around 3:00pm he entered the apartment of 28 Charisse Christopher and her two
children Lacie (2) and Nicholas (3)
 Payne made sexual advances towards Charisse
 After she resisted, this lead Payne to kill both Charisse and Lacie
 Nicholas survived but received several severe stab wounds
 Payne was convicted by a jury on two counts of murder
Facts of the case continued
 At Sentencing, the State presented testimony given by Charisses mother
 She spoke about the negative impact the murders had on her grandson Nicholas
 The prosecution also presented argument regarding Nicholass traumatic
experience
 The jury sentenced Payne to death on each count of murder
 Payne argued that the prosecution could not use testimony regarding how the
victims death impacted family members when contending for the death penalty
based on two previous Supreme Court case rulings Booth v. Maryland and South
Carolina v. Gathers
 Tennessee Supreme Court ruled against him
Issue
 Does the Eighth Amendment prohibit a capital sentencing jury from considering the
impact that a victim's death had upon surviving family members?
Supreme Court Holding
 6-3 decision
 No, a sentencing jury is not prohibited by the Eighth Amendment from considering the
impact that a victim's death had upon surviving family members
 This ruling overturned previous holdings decided in Booth v. Maryland and South
Carolina v. Gathers
 The court characterized the grandmother's testimony as harmless beyond a reasonable
doubt. Assessment of harm caused by the defendant is a crucial factor in determining
appropriate punishment. Victim impact is a method of informing the jury about such
harm.
 The court determined that the prosecutor's comments during closing argument were
"relevant to [Payne's] personal responsibility and moral guilt."
Dissent
 Justice Marshall, Justice Blackmun, and Justice Stevens all dissented
 The majority overruled Booth v. Maryland and South Carolina v. Gathers based
on the dissenting opinions of those cases
 Victim impact sheds no light on victims guilt and moral culpability. This allows
jurors to decide for the death penalty based off of emotions rather than reason
Opinion
 More conservative Supreme Court
 Aggravating factor
 Emotional

More Related Content

Viewers also liked (14)

germany 2
germany 2germany 2
germany 2
Noora Alwahedi
Mes hobbiesMes hobbies
Mes hobbies
Iris Jamaers
Digital CD Portfolio July 2015
Digital CD Portfolio July 2015Digital CD Portfolio July 2015
Digital CD Portfolio July 2015
Abeer Ishkuntana
Exploring wikis, blogs, and web publishing
Exploring wikis, blogs, and web publishingExploring wikis, blogs, and web publishing
Exploring wikis, blogs, and web publishing
nat96cav
Buen uso de la red y el internet (1)Buen uso de la red y el internet (1)
Buen uso de la red y el internet (1)
LauraValentinaMs
Advert conventions
Advert conventionsAdvert conventions
Advert conventions
HanifArriega
A.2.1 Hiser ppt
A.2.1 Hiser pptA.2.1 Hiser ppt
A.2.1 Hiser ppt
Eric Hiser
Macroview weekly news update - 22nd february 2016
Macroview   weekly news update - 22nd february 2016Macroview   weekly news update - 22nd february 2016
Macroview weekly news update - 22nd february 2016
Paul Couchman
US Open Martial Arts Championship - Rules and Regulations
US Open Martial Arts Championship - Rules and RegulationsUS Open Martial Arts Championship - Rules and Regulations
US Open Martial Arts Championship - Rules and Regulations
Mark Li
The Psychology of Empathy
The Psychology of EmpathyThe Psychology of Empathy
The Psychology of Empathy
Mattersight
electricity generation from speed breaker
electricity generation from speed breakerelectricity generation from speed breaker
electricity generation from speed breaker
Feroz Ahmed
Parasitos GeneraridadesParasitos Generaridades
Parasitos Generaridades
Furia Argentina
Cursos gratisCursos gratis
Cursos gratis
ValentinaRivera24
BroncodilatadoresBroncodilatadores
Broncodilatadores
AR EG
Mes hobbiesMes hobbies
Mes hobbies
Iris Jamaers
Digital CD Portfolio July 2015
Digital CD Portfolio July 2015Digital CD Portfolio July 2015
Digital CD Portfolio July 2015
Abeer Ishkuntana
Exploring wikis, blogs, and web publishing
Exploring wikis, blogs, and web publishingExploring wikis, blogs, and web publishing
Exploring wikis, blogs, and web publishing
nat96cav
Buen uso de la red y el internet (1)Buen uso de la red y el internet (1)
Buen uso de la red y el internet (1)
LauraValentinaMs
Advert conventions
Advert conventionsAdvert conventions
Advert conventions
HanifArriega
A.2.1 Hiser ppt
A.2.1 Hiser pptA.2.1 Hiser ppt
A.2.1 Hiser ppt
Eric Hiser
Macroview weekly news update - 22nd february 2016
Macroview   weekly news update - 22nd february 2016Macroview   weekly news update - 22nd february 2016
Macroview weekly news update - 22nd february 2016
Paul Couchman
US Open Martial Arts Championship - Rules and Regulations
US Open Martial Arts Championship - Rules and RegulationsUS Open Martial Arts Championship - Rules and Regulations
US Open Martial Arts Championship - Rules and Regulations
Mark Li
The Psychology of Empathy
The Psychology of EmpathyThe Psychology of Empathy
The Psychology of Empathy
Mattersight
electricity generation from speed breaker
electricity generation from speed breakerelectricity generation from speed breaker
electricity generation from speed breaker
Feroz Ahmed
Parasitos GeneraridadesParasitos Generaridades
Parasitos Generaridades
Furia Argentina
Cursos gratisCursos gratis
Cursos gratis
ValentinaRivera24
BroncodilatadoresBroncodilatadores
Broncodilatadores
AR EG

Similar to Payne v Tennessee (11)

RACE, ETHNICITY, AND THE DEATH PENALTYConstitutionality.docx
RACE, ETHNICITY, AND THE DEATH PENALTYConstitutionality.docxRACE, ETHNICITY, AND THE DEATH PENALTYConstitutionality.docx
RACE, ETHNICITY, AND THE DEATH PENALTYConstitutionality.docx
alisondakintxt
Victims' rights fair and equal cja 394
Victims' rights  fair and equal cja 394Victims' rights  fair and equal cja 394
Victims' rights fair and equal cja 394
Mimi Harvill
Research paper presentation
Research paper presentationResearch paper presentation
Research paper presentation
Jordon Pollard
Violent Crimes - Against the Family
Violent Crimes -  Against the FamilyViolent Crimes -  Against the Family
Violent Crimes - Against the Family
Beth Schoren
Death penalty overview
Death penalty overviewDeath penalty overview
Death penalty overview
kdmitchell
Pollock ethics 8e_ch10
Pollock ethics 8e_ch10Pollock ethics 8e_ch10
Pollock ethics 8e_ch10
windleh
Supreme Court
Supreme CourtSupreme Court
Supreme Court
dficker
Capital punishment by Samax
Capital punishment by SamaxCapital punishment by Samax
Capital punishment by Samax
samaxsaini
Chapter 10
Chapter 10Chapter 10
Chapter 10
glickauf
Running head PHILOSOPHIES & RULINGS1Running Head PHILO.docx
Running head PHILOSOPHIES & RULINGS1Running Head PHILO.docxRunning head PHILOSOPHIES & RULINGS1Running Head PHILO.docx
Running head PHILOSOPHIES & RULINGS1Running Head PHILO.docx
toltonkendal
Anthony trial
Anthony trialAnthony trial
Anthony trial
MicBrogley
RACE, ETHNICITY, AND THE DEATH PENALTYConstitutionality.docx
RACE, ETHNICITY, AND THE DEATH PENALTYConstitutionality.docxRACE, ETHNICITY, AND THE DEATH PENALTYConstitutionality.docx
RACE, ETHNICITY, AND THE DEATH PENALTYConstitutionality.docx
alisondakintxt
Victims' rights fair and equal cja 394
Victims' rights  fair and equal cja 394Victims' rights  fair and equal cja 394
Victims' rights fair and equal cja 394
Mimi Harvill
Research paper presentation
Research paper presentationResearch paper presentation
Research paper presentation
Jordon Pollard
Violent Crimes - Against the Family
Violent Crimes -  Against the FamilyViolent Crimes -  Against the Family
Violent Crimes - Against the Family
Beth Schoren
Death penalty overview
Death penalty overviewDeath penalty overview
Death penalty overview
kdmitchell
Pollock ethics 8e_ch10
Pollock ethics 8e_ch10Pollock ethics 8e_ch10
Pollock ethics 8e_ch10
windleh
Supreme Court
Supreme CourtSupreme Court
Supreme Court
dficker
Capital punishment by Samax
Capital punishment by SamaxCapital punishment by Samax
Capital punishment by Samax
samaxsaini
Chapter 10
Chapter 10Chapter 10
Chapter 10
glickauf
Running head PHILOSOPHIES & RULINGS1Running Head PHILO.docx
Running head PHILOSOPHIES & RULINGS1Running Head PHILO.docxRunning head PHILOSOPHIES & RULINGS1Running Head PHILO.docx
Running head PHILOSOPHIES & RULINGS1Running Head PHILO.docx
toltonkendal
Anthony trial
Anthony trialAnthony trial
Anthony trial
MicBrogley

Payne v Tennessee

  • 1. Payne v Tennessee 501 US 808 (1991)
  • 2. Facts of the case Pervis Tyrone Payne spent an early afternoon binge drinking and injecting cocaine Around 3:00pm he entered the apartment of 28 Charisse Christopher and her two children Lacie (2) and Nicholas (3) Payne made sexual advances towards Charisse After she resisted, this lead Payne to kill both Charisse and Lacie Nicholas survived but received several severe stab wounds Payne was convicted by a jury on two counts of murder
  • 3. Facts of the case continued At Sentencing, the State presented testimony given by Charisses mother She spoke about the negative impact the murders had on her grandson Nicholas The prosecution also presented argument regarding Nicholass traumatic experience The jury sentenced Payne to death on each count of murder Payne argued that the prosecution could not use testimony regarding how the victims death impacted family members when contending for the death penalty based on two previous Supreme Court case rulings Booth v. Maryland and South Carolina v. Gathers Tennessee Supreme Court ruled against him
  • 4. Issue Does the Eighth Amendment prohibit a capital sentencing jury from considering the impact that a victim's death had upon surviving family members?
  • 5. Supreme Court Holding 6-3 decision No, a sentencing jury is not prohibited by the Eighth Amendment from considering the impact that a victim's death had upon surviving family members This ruling overturned previous holdings decided in Booth v. Maryland and South Carolina v. Gathers The court characterized the grandmother's testimony as harmless beyond a reasonable doubt. Assessment of harm caused by the defendant is a crucial factor in determining appropriate punishment. Victim impact is a method of informing the jury about such harm. The court determined that the prosecutor's comments during closing argument were "relevant to [Payne's] personal responsibility and moral guilt."
  • 6. Dissent Justice Marshall, Justice Blackmun, and Justice Stevens all dissented The majority overruled Booth v. Maryland and South Carolina v. Gathers based on the dissenting opinions of those cases Victim impact sheds no light on victims guilt and moral culpability. This allows jurors to decide for the death penalty based off of emotions rather than reason
  • 7. Opinion More conservative Supreme Court Aggravating factor Emotional