際際滷

際際滷Share a Scribd company logo
21th November 2008  Kassel

   Former EMBS students




                              Mistery Shopping
WHAT??                             Bruder Grimm-Museum in Kassel.

REASON                             We wanted to do something interesting and
                                   entertaining related to the city of Kassel.
Choice: We chose this museum for his worldwide recognition, the Grimm brothers being
internationally famous.

Evaluation: We wanted before all to evaluate the quality of their personnel and the fun
              and entertainment this museum could give us.

Our expectations before starting:                               We didnt know
low expectations,
some books,                                                        the service
illustrations,                                                     concept!!!!
fairy tales. A comfortable museum and a place to relax.


                                        Ronan Chardonneau
 21/11/2008                                                                        2
                                        Rosa Paola Picariello
THE INSTRUMENT 1/3
         4 parts corresponding to the 4 steps of a visit.
         Different weights that correspond on the impact on the overall
        quality of the service;
        Two different scales for two different types of questions:


             I totally agree   I agree             Indifferent   I disagree   Totally disagree


                  4 PT           3 PT               2 PT         1 PT            0 PT




                                         Ronan Chardonneau
21/11/2008                                                                                       3
                                         Rosa Paola Picariello
THE INSTRUMENT 2/3




              Ronan Chardonneau
21/11/2008                            4
              Rosa Paola Picariello
THE INSTRUMENT 3/3




             Final score: 72%



                                Ronan Chardonneau
21/11/2008                                              5
                                Rosa Paola Picariello
TANGIBLES   PROCESS
CORE
AUGUMENTED




                          Ronan Chardonneau
21/11/2008                                        6
                          Rosa Paola Picariello
RESULTS
Staff: high moral and empathetic;                                  45%
Settings and Atmosphere: very good;
Exhibits: interesting and well exposed
but lack in explanation;

Very good core but no additional
                                                    50%
services.                                                                 60%
Problem: no access for disable

                                                                  82,8%


                   Our Expectation have been in part confirmed:
                     there was not a real focus on the stories.


                                         Ronan Chardonneau
   21/11/2008                                                                   7
                                         Rosa Paola Picariello
RECOMMENDATIONS




             Ronan Chardonneau
21/11/2008                           8
             Rosa Paola Picariello
THANK YOU FOR
             YOUR ATTENTION
              Ronan Chardonneau
21/11/2008                            9
              Rosa Paola Picariello

More Related Content

Mistery Shopping Grimm Museum Example

  • 1. 21th November 2008 Kassel Former EMBS students Mistery Shopping
  • 2. WHAT?? Bruder Grimm-Museum in Kassel. REASON We wanted to do something interesting and entertaining related to the city of Kassel. Choice: We chose this museum for his worldwide recognition, the Grimm brothers being internationally famous. Evaluation: We wanted before all to evaluate the quality of their personnel and the fun and entertainment this museum could give us. Our expectations before starting: We didnt know low expectations, some books, the service illustrations, concept!!!! fairy tales. A comfortable museum and a place to relax. Ronan Chardonneau 21/11/2008 2 Rosa Paola Picariello
  • 3. THE INSTRUMENT 1/3 4 parts corresponding to the 4 steps of a visit. Different weights that correspond on the impact on the overall quality of the service; Two different scales for two different types of questions: I totally agree I agree Indifferent I disagree Totally disagree 4 PT 3 PT 2 PT 1 PT 0 PT Ronan Chardonneau 21/11/2008 3 Rosa Paola Picariello
  • 4. THE INSTRUMENT 2/3 Ronan Chardonneau 21/11/2008 4 Rosa Paola Picariello
  • 5. THE INSTRUMENT 3/3 Final score: 72% Ronan Chardonneau 21/11/2008 5 Rosa Paola Picariello
  • 6. TANGIBLES PROCESS CORE AUGUMENTED Ronan Chardonneau 21/11/2008 6 Rosa Paola Picariello
  • 7. RESULTS Staff: high moral and empathetic; 45% Settings and Atmosphere: very good; Exhibits: interesting and well exposed but lack in explanation; Very good core but no additional 50% services. 60% Problem: no access for disable 82,8% Our Expectation have been in part confirmed: there was not a real focus on the stories. Ronan Chardonneau 21/11/2008 7 Rosa Paola Picariello
  • 8. RECOMMENDATIONS Ronan Chardonneau 21/11/2008 8 Rosa Paola Picariello
  • 9. THANK YOU FOR YOUR ATTENTION Ronan Chardonneau 21/11/2008 9 Rosa Paola Picariello