This document discusses two ethical theories:
1. Utilitarianism focuses on achieving the greatest happiness for the greatest number of people. It was developed by Jeremy Bentham and John Stuart Mill.
2. Situation Ethics argues that ethical decisions should be made on a case-by-case basis by following the principle of love rather than absolute rules. It was proposed by Joseph Fletcher.
The document asks if it is okay to approve same-sex marriage and stem cell research according to these two theories.
2. Basic statements
Happiness is the only thing that is good in itself
It is moral to sacrifice ones desires to help the greatest number
happiness.
Democracy?
3. Quantitative Utilitarianism
Jeremy Bentham
Hedonic calculus
Its intensity
Its duration
Its certainty or uncertainty
Its nearness or remoteness how wide
ranging is it?
Its ability to continue. How continuous is
the pleasure?
Its purity the chance it has of not
producing the opposite .
Who is affected by it?
4. Qualitative Utilitarianism
John Stuart Mill 1806 1873
Mill rejected Benthams use of the
Hedonic Calculus. In his view some
pleasures are of a higher quality than
others.
higher pleasures intellectual
But pleasures of the body are lower
pleasures appetite.
6. Basic Statements
It is moral to set aside a rule if we have a good reason for
doing so.
Ethical decisions should follow flexible guidelines rather than
absolute rules, and be taken on a case by case basis.
Only one thing is intrinsically good: love.
Doing good is a matter of acting in love. All we need is love.
7. A christian approach
Joseph Fletcher (1905-1991)
Moral judgments are decisions, not conclusions
Only one thing is intrinsically
good, namely, love: nothing else
Love "wills the neighbour's good" [desires the
best for our neighbour] whether we like them
or not
Love and justice are the same, for justice is love
distributed
The rightness depends on many factors
Love as agape
Rules are not to guide but to illuminate.
8. Essay
Is it OK to approve same-sex marriage and stem cell studies?
According to your answer, do you consider yourself a
utilitarian/situational ethicists?