This document discusses various digital advertising campaigns run by Klikki.com, including:
1) A rich media introduction video campaign that successfully drove over 200,000 video starts and 140,000 completions.
2) A predictive behavioural targeting campaign for Brand Y that increased brand awareness by 20% and purchase intent by 7% for users in the 5-8 impression frequency group.
3) A super target group campaign for Brand X that showed a 67% increase in brand awareness for users in the 5-7 impression frequency group when using data-driven optimization, but no impact when using run-of-network advertising.
The document also discusses Klikki's pricing and an offer for
8. Klikki | Video viewed
Video
250000
212223
200000
185418
168543
155629
150000 141644
Video
100000
50000
0
Video Play Started 25% of Video Played 50% of Video Played 75% of Video Played Video Completed
2012-11-01 8
9. Klikki | Impressions vs. engaging impressions
Impressions and Engaging Impresions by Media
350,000
304,135
300,000
250,000
217,119
200,000
150,000
100,000
50,000
0
klikki.com
Impressions Engaging Impressions
2012-11-01 9
10. Klikki | Engagement time & rate
Avg. Engagement Time and Engagement Rate (%)
2.50 80.00%
2.21
70.00%
Avg.Engagement Time (sec.)
2.00
60.00%
Engagement Rate (%)
50.00%
1.50
40.00%
1.00
30.00%
20.00%
0.50
10.00%
0.00 0.00%
klikki.com
Avg. Engagement Time (sec.) Engagement Rate(%) Linear (Avg. Engagement Time (sec.))
2012-11-01 10
11. Conclusion
The purpose of increase awareness through rich media introduction video was reached
video started over 200 000 times and ended over 140 000 times
The banner formats where engaging Roughly 220 000 impression out of 300 000 had
some sort of engagement element on it
Even though the engagement rate was fairly good (roughly 70 %), engagement time could
have been better (2.21 sec.)
12. Brand Y | Predictive behavioural targeting campaign
Campaign
Description
14. Brand X | Brand Measurement
In the survey we ask about :
a. Recall.
b. Brand sympathy (Likeability)
c. Purchase Intention
1. Control group
Users who have not been exposed
for the campaign.
2. Test group
Users who have been exposed
for the campaign.
15. Brand Y | Predictive behavioural targeting campaign
RESULTS
16. Brand Y | Brand Awareness
(pretest vs. PBT Target group divided on frequencies)
Al frequencies shows an increase in awareness. Greatest are the one measured on the frequency
between 5-8 with 27%.
Control Group = 527; 1-2= 330; 3-4 = 317 ; 5-8= 156; 9+ = 137
17. Brand Y | Brand Sympathy
(Pretest vs. PBT Target group divided by frequencies)
Brand Sympathy has the highest effect on 5+ impressions.
Control Group = 477, 1-2= 297; 3-4 = 276; 5-8=142; 8+= 125
18. Brand Y | Purchase Intention
(Pretest vs. PBT Target group divided by frequencies)
All frequencies shows an increase. Highest are the one with 23% from 9+ impressions. There is a clear
correlation between frequency and purchase level.
Control Group = 483; 1-2= 310; 3-4 = 285 ; 5-8=143; 8+ = 130
19. Brand Y | Overall - Campaign effect
Awareness is increased by 20% and purchase intension by 7%.
Control Group = 527; PBT target group = 940
20. Conclusion
The optimal frequency in order to increase awareness, sympathy and purchase intension
is 5+ ad impressions.
The increase in brand awareness can be considered to be significant (27 % freq. 5-7)
given the fact that the brand is well known
There is a correlation between Purchase intension and frequency.
No wear-out effect measured.
21. Brand X | Super target group campaign
CAMPAIGN
DESCRIPTION
22. Brand X | Campaign description
Campaign target
Optimizing on Brand Awareness
Things about the campaign.
The product is a brand new webstore.
The campaign period was rather long.
Target group.
Run of Network & and data driven optimisation
Campaign volume
Approx. 20 mill. ad-impressions cpm / cpc NOT optimised
2 mill. ad-impressions data driven optimization
Period
From week 25 34.
23. Brand X | Brand Measurement
In the survey we ask about :
a. Recall.
b. Brand sympathy (Likeability)
c. Purchase Intention
1. Control group
Users who have not been exposed
for the campaign.
2. Test group
Users who have been exposed
for the campaign.
25. Brand X | Campaign effect without optimization
RON compared to pretest, shows no impact on awareness and sympathy. A little decrease in purchase
intension.
Control Group = 2612, Test Group = 1314
26. Brand X | Brand Awareness
(pretest vs. optimised campaign divided on frequencies)
Al frequencies from 1-7 shows an increase in awareness. Greatest are the one measured on the
frequency between 5-7 with 67%. With frequencies higher than 7 shows a wearout-effect.
Control Group = 2612; 1-2= 224; 3-4 = 120 ; 5-7= 122; 8+ = 320
27. Brand X | Brand Sympathy
(Pretest vs. branding opt. divided by frequencies)
Brand Sympathy has the highest effect on 3-4 impressions. 8 impressions or more results in a
decreasing effect.
Control Group = 2302, 1-2= 196; 3-4 = 102 ; 5-7=98; 8+= 288
28. Brand X | Purchase Intention
(Pretest vs. branding opt. divided by frequencies)
All frequencies shows an increase. Highest are the one with 38% from 5-7 impressions. Again we see
the wearout-effect on high impressions.
Control Group = 2479; 1-2= 208; 3-4 = 111 ; 5-7=111; 8+ = 306
29. Conclusion
The optimal frequency in order to increase awareness, sympathy and purchase intension
is between 3-7.
Frequencies from 8 and higher are wasted.
No branding effect measured on RON/CPM/CPC.
Data driven optimisation increases impact on Brand awareness up to 67%
31. 5. Tarjouskampanja
KAMPANJATARJOUS:
15 % mediatoimistoalennus
40 % kampanja-alennus
EHDOT:
Kyseess辰 tulee olla rich media tai kohdentamisprofiilikampanja
Budjetin tulee olla v辰hint辰辰n 2000 euroa
Kampanja tulee toteuttaa t辰m辰n vuoden aikana
EI SIIS MUUTA KUIN KATSOMAAN OMAT PYDLL VIEL OLEVAT
JOULUKAMPPIKSET LPI JA YHTEYDENOTTO KLIKKIIN!!!
2012-11-01 31