Crosschecking the Mobile Web for People with Visual Impairments
Download as PPTX, PDF
0 likes296 views
Presents a reflection on the assessment of mobile Web content for people with disabilities. It proposes a rationale for an evaluation framework considering: (1) the coherent merge of state of the art guidelines on Web accessibility and mobile best practices; and (2) the usage of current and prospective practices particularly for people with visual impairments. It also presents the preliminary results of a questionnaire that validates that rationale laying the grounds for a coherent evaluation approach.
Crosschecking the Mobile Web for People with Visual Impairments
- 1. Crosschecking the Mobile Web for People with VisualImpairmentsLu鱈s Carri巽o, Rui Lopes, Rog辿rio BandeiraUniversityofLisbonAbsInt AbsoluteInteractionGroupLaSIGEResearchUnit
- 2. MotivationIs it worth to visit this Web site? and using my mobile device?Atl: A beach in Goa at the sunset with coconut trees, listening to the birds and the wavesWWW, 03-2011lmc@di.fc.ul.pt2
- 3. Which GuidelinesWCAG , Answer: yesMWBP Answer: no! and with disability specifics?We argue: it depends!( and with mobile specifics?It also depends)WWW, 03-2011lmc@di.fc.ul.pt3
- 4. WCAG & DisabilitiesBW, Yesilada et alACCESSIBLE, Chalkiaet alWWW, 03-2011lmc@di.fc.ul.pt4
- 5. WCAG & MWBPChuter and Yesiladafor WCAG/MWBPlevels of e鍖ort (nothing, some..But with specificsDropping guidelines is not straightforwardWCAG 2.1 is dropped for nonvisual impaired; USE_OF_COLOR should not!Should MWBP be always applied?WWW, 03-2011lmc@di.fc.ul.pt5
- 6. MWBP & DisabilitiesA really smart phone recognizing a visually impaired userTowards Mobile Web Accessibility, Lopes et alWWW, 03-2011lmc@di.fc.ul.pt6
- 7. RationaleFor a specific disabilitySelect WGAG subsetSelect MWBP subsetAdopt them considering the levels of effortMobile Web Accessibly Evaluation Tool, BandeiraWWW, 03-2011lmc@di.fc.ul.pt7
- 8. Disabilities and ConfigurationReally drop visual related checks?!Visual impaired & browsers configurationWhat about mobile devices?WWW, 03-2011lmc@di.fc.ul.pt8
- 9. QuestionnaireDesktopFrequency of useScreen readers or what elseBrowser configurationWhy or why notMobileBasically the same+ use it for web browsingWhy or why notUser profileWWW, 03-2011lmc@di.fc.ul.pt9
- 10. Sample18 responses; 9 blind; 9 partially sightedAll web desktop usersHalf use mobile devices5 blind; 4 partially sightedThus preliminaryWWW, 03-2011lmc@di.fc.ul.pt10
- 11. ResultsBlind usersPattern confirmed on both settingsMob: 4/5 disable picture; 5th browse specific sitesBoth: 6/9 disable picture; 2 disable CSS&JSPartially sightedGenerally, no configuration doneWWW, 03-2011lmc@di.fc.ul.pt11
- 12. DiscussionBlind usersChecks expectations Must be consolidated by numbersPartially sightedRejects expectationsMust be further studiedCould be generalizedEvaluate the content based on the user-agent settingsWWW, 03-2011lmc@di.fc.ul.pt12
- 13. What nextExtend the studyFurther understand the scope of the patternFind other patterns Understand new guidelines for new mobile devicesDevices/configurations/disabilities!WWW, 03-2011lmc@di.fc.ul.pt13
- 14. Thank youLuis Carri巽o, lmc@di.fc.ul.ptWWW, 03-2011lmc@di.fc.ul.pt14
- 15. MotivationDo I want to visit this Web site using my mobile device?Alt: noneAtl: this is a HUGE picture of a beach in Goa at the sun set with a coconut tree in the first planeDo not load images!WWW, 03-2011lmc@di.fc.ul.pt15