際際滷

際際滷Share a Scribd company logo
ITEM ANALYSIS
Ann Meredith Garcia, MD
What is item analysis?
 Judging the quality of
test items by
examining the
students responses
 Competent vs. less
competent students?
 Difficulty of items?
How is item analysis done?
Administer the
test
Check the
students
responses to
separate items
Check the total
scores
Tasks of item analysis
1st task: Item discrimination
 Sort the students who
know the topic well from
those who do not
 Correlate performance on
a single test item with
total test performance
 (+) Correlation  better
discrimination
2nd task: Item difficulty
Electronic item analysis
Student Item 1
Score
Total
Score / 30
A 1 25
B 1 19
C 1 18
D 0 16
E 1 12
F 0 10
 Average total score
(correct Item 1) = 18.5
 Average total score
(incorrect Item 1) = 13
 Computed correlation
coefficient = 0.53
 Item is to some extent
related to the total score
Correct = 1
Incorrect = 0
Electronic item analysis
r = correlation of an option with the total score
p = percentage of students who chose that option (n = 65)
 Correct options should show positive correlations; distractors
should show negative correlations
Item 1: r = 0.25  low correlation
Item 2: r = 0.49  fairly good correlation
Item 3: r = 0.34  modest correlation
 r  0.15  course content is not being assessed well 
eliminate the item (OR revise)
Item A B C
1 r = -0.27
p = 13.89
r = 0.25
p = 50.00
r = -0.06
p = 36.11
2 r = -0.46
p = 5.56
r = 0.49
p = 88.86
r = -0.22
p = 5.56
3 r = -0.30
p = 16.67
r = -0.13
p = 27.78
r = 0.34
p = 55.56
Electronic item analysis
r = correlation of an option with the total score
p = percentage of students who chose that option (n = 65)
 Standard error (SE) = 1 /  (number of students  1)
= 0.12
 Any r > 2(SE) will be accepted as other than a chance
relationship between the item and the total score
Item 1: r = 0.25 > 0.24 [2(SE)]  very marginal but acceptable
Item A B C
1 r = -0.27
p = 13.89
r = 0.25
p = 50.00
r = -0.06
p = 36.11
2 r = -0.46
p = 5.56
r = 0.49
p = 88.86
r = -0.22
p = 5.56
3 r = -0.30
p = 16.67
r = -0.13
p = 27.78
r = 0.34
p = 55.56
Item analysis by hand
 Step 1: Arrange the students papers according to their
test scores (highest to lowest).
 Step 2: Divide these into high scorers vs. low scorers.
 Step 3: Tabulate the number of students who chose each
option in both groups.
 Step 4: Compute for the discrimination index.
Item 1 A B C D Total
High scorers 2 4 0 16 22
Low scorers 12 7 0 4 23
Item analysis by hand
 Step 4: Compute for the discrimination index (DI).
DI = (NumHigh  NumLow)
Number of students in larger group
= (16  4) / 23 = 0.52
* Ranges from 0  1.00
* Can also be negative (for distractors)
Item 1 A B C D Total
High scorers 2 4 0 16 22
Low scorers 12 7 0 4 23
Item analysis by hand
Alternative: Straight difference method
 Steps 1  3: Same
 Step 4: Compute for NumHigh  NumLow.
 If  0.10(n)  adequate (used across all items)
16  4 = 12
0.10(45) = 4.5
Item 1 A B C D Total
High scorers 2 4 0 16 22
Low scorers 12 7 0 4 23
Analysis of distractors
 Distractor C was not chosen by any student  3-option
item (0.33 instead of 0.25 chance level of guessing the
item correctly)
 Good item  each distractor will be chosen more often
by the low scorers
Item 1 A B C D
High scorers 4 13 0 3
Low scorers 7 9 0 4
p 27.5 55.0 0.0 18.5
Tasks of item analysis
2nd task: Item difficulty
 Difficulty index/facility
index = proportion of
students who get an item
correctly
 Step 1: Award a score to
each student.
 Step 2: Arrange the scored
tests from highest to lowest.
 Step 3: Identify the upper
and lower 27%.
 Step 4: Count the response
counts in each group.
Item 1 A B C D Total
High
scorers
2 4 0 16 22
Low
scorers
11 7 0 4 22
Tasks of item analysis
2nd task: Item difficulty
 Difficulty index/facility
index = proportion of
students who get an item
correctly
 Step 5: Calculate the
difficulty index.
= H + L
N
H = no. of students in the high group with
a correct answer
L = no. of students in the low group with a
correct answer
N = total no. of students
Item 1 A B C D Total
High
scorers
2 4 0 16 22
Low
scorers
11 7 0 4 22
Tasks of item analysis
2nd task: Item difficulty
 Difficulty index/facility
index = proportion of
students who get an item
correctly
 Ranges from 0  1.00
 Best  0.50 (0.30  0.70)
 Larger index  easier
item; smaller index 
more difficult item
DI = (16 + 4) / 80
= 0.25
 Criteria:
 0.35 = excellent question
 0.25  0.34 = good question
 0.15  0.24 = marginal
question  revise
 <0.15 = poor question 
discard
Item 1 A B C D Total
High
scorers
2 4 0 16 22
Low
scorers
11 7 0 4 22
Item analysis for essay tests
 Step 1: Identify the upper and lower 25% of the students.
 Step 2: Compute for the following:
Disc. = (Sum of scores for highs  sum of score for lows)
N x (max. possible score on item)
Diff. = (Sum of scores for highs + sum of score for lows)
2N x (max. possible score on item)
N = 25% of the number tested
Item Score
High Group Low Group
No. of Students No. of Students
x Score
No. of Students No. of Students
x Score
10 9 90 1 10
8 6 48 0 0
6 2 12 4 24
4 3 12 7 28
2 0 0 8 16
Total 20 162 20 78
Item analysis for essay tests
 Step 2: Compute for the following:
Disc. = (Sum of scores for highs  sum of score for lows)
N x (max. possible score on item)
= (162  78) / [(0.25 x 80) x 10] = 0.42
Satisfactory discrimination
Item Score
High Group Low Group
No. of Students No. of Students
x Score
No. of Students No. of Students
x Score
10 9 90 1 10
8 6 48 0 0
6 2 12 4 24
4 3 12 7 28
2 0 0 8 16
Total 20 162 20 78
Item analysis for essay tests
 Step 2: Compute for the following:
Diff. = (Sum of scores for highs + sum of score for lows)
2N x (max. possible score on item)
= (162 + 78) / [(2 x 0.25 x 80) x 10] = 0.60
Satisfactory difficulty
Item Score
High Group Low Group
No. of Students No. of Students
x Score
No. of Students No. of Students
x Score
10 9 90 1 10
8 6 48 0 0
6 2 12 4 24
4 3 12 7 28
2 0 0 8 16
Total 20 162 20 78
Item response theory and item analysis
 Calculates the odds of getting an item right  converts
this number to a natural logarithm
 Allows faculty to equate the item difficulty scale on one
test to the scale of another test and across different
student groups
 Useful system for building item banks
Thank you!

More Related Content

13-itemanalysis-161127124647.pptx

  • 2. What is item analysis? Judging the quality of test items by examining the students responses Competent vs. less competent students? Difficulty of items?
  • 3. How is item analysis done? Administer the test Check the students responses to separate items Check the total scores
  • 4. Tasks of item analysis 1st task: Item discrimination Sort the students who know the topic well from those who do not Correlate performance on a single test item with total test performance (+) Correlation better discrimination 2nd task: Item difficulty
  • 5. Electronic item analysis Student Item 1 Score Total Score / 30 A 1 25 B 1 19 C 1 18 D 0 16 E 1 12 F 0 10 Average total score (correct Item 1) = 18.5 Average total score (incorrect Item 1) = 13 Computed correlation coefficient = 0.53 Item is to some extent related to the total score Correct = 1 Incorrect = 0
  • 6. Electronic item analysis r = correlation of an option with the total score p = percentage of students who chose that option (n = 65) Correct options should show positive correlations; distractors should show negative correlations Item 1: r = 0.25 low correlation Item 2: r = 0.49 fairly good correlation Item 3: r = 0.34 modest correlation r 0.15 course content is not being assessed well eliminate the item (OR revise) Item A B C 1 r = -0.27 p = 13.89 r = 0.25 p = 50.00 r = -0.06 p = 36.11 2 r = -0.46 p = 5.56 r = 0.49 p = 88.86 r = -0.22 p = 5.56 3 r = -0.30 p = 16.67 r = -0.13 p = 27.78 r = 0.34 p = 55.56
  • 7. Electronic item analysis r = correlation of an option with the total score p = percentage of students who chose that option (n = 65) Standard error (SE) = 1 / (number of students 1) = 0.12 Any r > 2(SE) will be accepted as other than a chance relationship between the item and the total score Item 1: r = 0.25 > 0.24 [2(SE)] very marginal but acceptable Item A B C 1 r = -0.27 p = 13.89 r = 0.25 p = 50.00 r = -0.06 p = 36.11 2 r = -0.46 p = 5.56 r = 0.49 p = 88.86 r = -0.22 p = 5.56 3 r = -0.30 p = 16.67 r = -0.13 p = 27.78 r = 0.34 p = 55.56
  • 8. Item analysis by hand Step 1: Arrange the students papers according to their test scores (highest to lowest). Step 2: Divide these into high scorers vs. low scorers. Step 3: Tabulate the number of students who chose each option in both groups. Step 4: Compute for the discrimination index. Item 1 A B C D Total High scorers 2 4 0 16 22 Low scorers 12 7 0 4 23
  • 9. Item analysis by hand Step 4: Compute for the discrimination index (DI). DI = (NumHigh NumLow) Number of students in larger group = (16 4) / 23 = 0.52 * Ranges from 0 1.00 * Can also be negative (for distractors) Item 1 A B C D Total High scorers 2 4 0 16 22 Low scorers 12 7 0 4 23
  • 10. Item analysis by hand Alternative: Straight difference method Steps 1 3: Same Step 4: Compute for NumHigh NumLow. If 0.10(n) adequate (used across all items) 16 4 = 12 0.10(45) = 4.5 Item 1 A B C D Total High scorers 2 4 0 16 22 Low scorers 12 7 0 4 23
  • 11. Analysis of distractors Distractor C was not chosen by any student 3-option item (0.33 instead of 0.25 chance level of guessing the item correctly) Good item each distractor will be chosen more often by the low scorers Item 1 A B C D High scorers 4 13 0 3 Low scorers 7 9 0 4 p 27.5 55.0 0.0 18.5
  • 12. Tasks of item analysis 2nd task: Item difficulty Difficulty index/facility index = proportion of students who get an item correctly Step 1: Award a score to each student. Step 2: Arrange the scored tests from highest to lowest. Step 3: Identify the upper and lower 27%. Step 4: Count the response counts in each group. Item 1 A B C D Total High scorers 2 4 0 16 22 Low scorers 11 7 0 4 22
  • 13. Tasks of item analysis 2nd task: Item difficulty Difficulty index/facility index = proportion of students who get an item correctly Step 5: Calculate the difficulty index. = H + L N H = no. of students in the high group with a correct answer L = no. of students in the low group with a correct answer N = total no. of students Item 1 A B C D Total High scorers 2 4 0 16 22 Low scorers 11 7 0 4 22
  • 14. Tasks of item analysis 2nd task: Item difficulty Difficulty index/facility index = proportion of students who get an item correctly Ranges from 0 1.00 Best 0.50 (0.30 0.70) Larger index easier item; smaller index more difficult item DI = (16 + 4) / 80 = 0.25 Criteria: 0.35 = excellent question 0.25 0.34 = good question 0.15 0.24 = marginal question revise <0.15 = poor question discard Item 1 A B C D Total High scorers 2 4 0 16 22 Low scorers 11 7 0 4 22
  • 15. Item analysis for essay tests Step 1: Identify the upper and lower 25% of the students. Step 2: Compute for the following: Disc. = (Sum of scores for highs sum of score for lows) N x (max. possible score on item) Diff. = (Sum of scores for highs + sum of score for lows) 2N x (max. possible score on item) N = 25% of the number tested Item Score High Group Low Group No. of Students No. of Students x Score No. of Students No. of Students x Score 10 9 90 1 10 8 6 48 0 0 6 2 12 4 24 4 3 12 7 28 2 0 0 8 16 Total 20 162 20 78
  • 16. Item analysis for essay tests Step 2: Compute for the following: Disc. = (Sum of scores for highs sum of score for lows) N x (max. possible score on item) = (162 78) / [(0.25 x 80) x 10] = 0.42 Satisfactory discrimination Item Score High Group Low Group No. of Students No. of Students x Score No. of Students No. of Students x Score 10 9 90 1 10 8 6 48 0 0 6 2 12 4 24 4 3 12 7 28 2 0 0 8 16 Total 20 162 20 78
  • 17. Item analysis for essay tests Step 2: Compute for the following: Diff. = (Sum of scores for highs + sum of score for lows) 2N x (max. possible score on item) = (162 + 78) / [(2 x 0.25 x 80) x 10] = 0.60 Satisfactory difficulty Item Score High Group Low Group No. of Students No. of Students x Score No. of Students No. of Students x Score 10 9 90 1 10 8 6 48 0 0 6 2 12 4 24 4 3 12 7 28 2 0 0 8 16 Total 20 162 20 78
  • 18. Item response theory and item analysis Calculates the odds of getting an item right converts this number to a natural logarithm Allows faculty to equate the item difficulty scale on one test to the scale of another test and across different student groups Useful system for building item banks