際際滷

際際滷Share a Scribd company logo
Guided by Submitted by 
Prof. Vijayakumari C K Anoop S 
S7 EEE 
Roll no: 10 
1
CONTENTS 
2 
 INTRODUCTION 
 MECHANISM OF BRAKING 
 CONTROL SCHEMATIC 
 CRITERIA 
 EFFECT OF 
 CURRENT 
 TURN OFF ANGLE 
 TURN ON ANGLE 
 CONCLUSION
INTRODUCTION 
 Electric vehicles - environment friendly, cost 
effective. 
 Motors used  DC motor, BLDC motor, AC 
induction motor, SRM motor. 
SRM - simple motor construction, low weight, 
high torque density, direct-drive and simple 
drivetrain system. 
 Main advantage of EVs is electro braking. 
 Effective braking operation of SRMs is important 
for EVs with better performances. 
3
MECHANISM OF BRAKING 
OPERATION OF SRM DRIVES 
 Braking operation is just the generating operation 
and it lasts by a short time in EVs. 
 Braking operation of SRMs includes two modes 
 Excitation mode 
 Generation mode 
4
EXCITATION 
MODE 
GENERATION 
MODE 
5
CONTROL SCHEMATIC OF 
BRAKING OPERATION IN SRM 
DRIVES 
The turn-on and the turn-off angles are defined to 
control the braking torque. 
The current reference with the hysteresis current 
controller is used to adjust the average value of 
braking torque. 6
CRITERIA OF BRAKING 
OPERATION 
Average torque 
Average braking torque per 
average excitation power 
Average braking torque per 
rms current 
magnitude of braking 
toerqffuiceiency of braking 
operation 
copper loss 
7
 The average torque of an SRM is computed as 
8 
 Tp - time value of an electrical period 
 Nph  number of phases 
 Tphk  instantaneous torque produced by a 
phase 
 The average excitation power under braking 
operation is 
 The positive power indicates that the SRM takes 
in electric power from the DC link. 
 The negative power indicates that the SRM 
output electric power to DC link.
The rms value of phase current is 
The average braking torque per average 
excitation power is expressed as 
The average braking torque per rms current is 
9
EFFECTS OF CURRENT 
10
11
12
 Large current reference results in large average 
braking torque 
 The average braking torque per average 
excitation power changes with the current 
reference and 
 The average braking torque per phase rms 
current goes up with increase in the current 
reference. 
13
EFFECTS OF TURN-OFF 
ANGLE 
14
15
16
 There are optimal turn-off angles to have the 
maximum average braking torque 
 The maximum average braking torque per average 
excitation power can be obtained when the turn-off 
angles are equal to the optimal values, and 
 There are always the optimal turn-off angle such that 
the average braking torque per rms current value 
reaches to the maximum value. 
17
EFFECTS OF TURN-ON ANGLE 
18
19
20
 The average braking torque becomes small if the turn-on 
angle increases 
 Variation in the turn-on angle result in little effect on 
the average braking torque per average excitation 
power and 
 The average braking torque per phase rms current 
decreases with increase in the turn-on angle. 
 The small turn-on angle is advantageous for braking 
operation of SRM drives. 
21
CONCLUSIONS: 
 The large current reference is beneficial to the 
desired braking operation of SRM drives in EVs. 
 The turn-off angle can be optimized to obtain: 
 the maximum average braking 
torque. 
 the maximum average braking 
torque per average excitation power. 
 the maximum average braking 
torque per phase rms current. 
22
CONCLUSIONS. 
 the turn-on angle has considerable effects on 
braking operation of SRM drives. 
 the small turn-on angle is advantageous for 
braking operation of SRM drives. 
23
REFERENCES 
24 
1) Omekanda, A.M.; Gopalakrishnan, S.; Klode, H.; 
Acoustic Noise ofSwitched Reluctance and 
Permanent Magnet Motors: A Comparison in the 
Context of Electric Brakes, 42nd IAS Annual 
Meeting, 2007, pp.2147  2153. 
2) X. D. Xue, K. W. E. Cheng, and N. Cheung, 
Selection of Electric Motor Drives for Electric 
Vehicles, presented at AUPEC 2008, 
Sydney,Australia. 
3) X. D. Xue, K. W. E. Cheng, and S. L. Ho, A 
Position Stepping Method for Predicting 
Performances of Switched Reluctance Motor 
Drive,IEEE Transactions on Energy Conversion, 
vol. 22, no. 4, Dec 2007, pp.839-847.
25 
THANK 
YOU

More Related Content

Braking Operation of SRM Drives

  • 1. Guided by Submitted by Prof. Vijayakumari C K Anoop S S7 EEE Roll no: 10 1
  • 2. CONTENTS 2 INTRODUCTION MECHANISM OF BRAKING CONTROL SCHEMATIC CRITERIA EFFECT OF CURRENT TURN OFF ANGLE TURN ON ANGLE CONCLUSION
  • 3. INTRODUCTION Electric vehicles - environment friendly, cost effective. Motors used DC motor, BLDC motor, AC induction motor, SRM motor. SRM - simple motor construction, low weight, high torque density, direct-drive and simple drivetrain system. Main advantage of EVs is electro braking. Effective braking operation of SRMs is important for EVs with better performances. 3
  • 4. MECHANISM OF BRAKING OPERATION OF SRM DRIVES Braking operation is just the generating operation and it lasts by a short time in EVs. Braking operation of SRMs includes two modes Excitation mode Generation mode 4
  • 6. CONTROL SCHEMATIC OF BRAKING OPERATION IN SRM DRIVES The turn-on and the turn-off angles are defined to control the braking torque. The current reference with the hysteresis current controller is used to adjust the average value of braking torque. 6
  • 7. CRITERIA OF BRAKING OPERATION Average torque Average braking torque per average excitation power Average braking torque per rms current magnitude of braking toerqffuiceiency of braking operation copper loss 7
  • 8. The average torque of an SRM is computed as 8 Tp - time value of an electrical period Nph number of phases Tphk instantaneous torque produced by a phase The average excitation power under braking operation is The positive power indicates that the SRM takes in electric power from the DC link. The negative power indicates that the SRM output electric power to DC link.
  • 9. The rms value of phase current is The average braking torque per average excitation power is expressed as The average braking torque per rms current is 9
  • 11. 11
  • 12. 12
  • 13. Large current reference results in large average braking torque The average braking torque per average excitation power changes with the current reference and The average braking torque per phase rms current goes up with increase in the current reference. 13
  • 15. 15
  • 16. 16
  • 17. There are optimal turn-off angles to have the maximum average braking torque The maximum average braking torque per average excitation power can be obtained when the turn-off angles are equal to the optimal values, and There are always the optimal turn-off angle such that the average braking torque per rms current value reaches to the maximum value. 17
  • 18. EFFECTS OF TURN-ON ANGLE 18
  • 19. 19
  • 20. 20
  • 21. The average braking torque becomes small if the turn-on angle increases Variation in the turn-on angle result in little effect on the average braking torque per average excitation power and The average braking torque per phase rms current decreases with increase in the turn-on angle. The small turn-on angle is advantageous for braking operation of SRM drives. 21
  • 22. CONCLUSIONS: The large current reference is beneficial to the desired braking operation of SRM drives in EVs. The turn-off angle can be optimized to obtain: the maximum average braking torque. the maximum average braking torque per average excitation power. the maximum average braking torque per phase rms current. 22
  • 23. CONCLUSIONS. the turn-on angle has considerable effects on braking operation of SRM drives. the small turn-on angle is advantageous for braking operation of SRM drives. 23
  • 24. REFERENCES 24 1) Omekanda, A.M.; Gopalakrishnan, S.; Klode, H.; Acoustic Noise ofSwitched Reluctance and Permanent Magnet Motors: A Comparison in the Context of Electric Brakes, 42nd IAS Annual Meeting, 2007, pp.2147 2153. 2) X. D. Xue, K. W. E. Cheng, and N. Cheung, Selection of Electric Motor Drives for Electric Vehicles, presented at AUPEC 2008, Sydney,Australia. 3) X. D. Xue, K. W. E. Cheng, and S. L. Ho, A Position Stepping Method for Predicting Performances of Switched Reluctance Motor Drive,IEEE Transactions on Energy Conversion, vol. 22, no. 4, Dec 2007, pp.839-847.