Fab labs provide the general public with digital fabrication capabilities to rapidly prototype and personally manufacture a limited number of items. While this enables innovation, fab labs are not suited for large-scale production, distribution, repair, or recycling. The document discusses how personal fabrication could help address sustainability issues through localized production and reduced transport if environmental concerns related to materials use and emissions are also addressed.
2. Fab labs have altered the landscape of innovation by providing
the general public with an opportunity to appropriate the digital
fabrication process: to make things personally.
They enable rapid prototyping but are not suited to
production on a larger scale (a limited number of identical
pieces can be made if the hardware is not overused), nor are
they suited to distribution, repair, or recycling.
SOURCE: Eychenne, F. (2012). Fab Labs Overview.The Fing (Fondation internet nouvelle g辿n辿ration). Retrieved from
http://www.slideshare.net/slidesharefing/fab-labs-overview
3. the inverse of digital fabrication is
digital recycling
the construction of digital
materials can contain the
information needed for their
deconstruction.
Bad guys are already impressively
effective at acquiring the best
available technology for the
destruction of their enemies; fab
labs are likely to have a far
greater impact on the stability of
the planet by helping everyone
else acquire the technology they
need for their survival.
SOURCE: Gershenfeld, N., 2005. FAB:The Coming Revolution onYour Desktop
From Personal Computers to Personal Fabrication. Basic Books, NewYork.
4. SOURCE: Kohtala, C., Hyysalo, S., 2015.Anticipated environmental sustainability of personal fabrication. Journal of Cleaner
Production 99, 333344. Open access from http://authors.elsevier.com/a/1R0Rk3QCo9EPdT until 1 July 2015.
5. SOURCE: Kohtala, C., 2014.Addressing sustainability in research on distributed production: an integrated literature review.
Journal of Cleaner Production. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.09.039
bespoke fabrication:
tailored, individualized
products, design and
fabrication in hands of
producer
mass fabrication:
unique products,
design and
fabrication in hands
of users in interaction
with each other
mass customization:
batch/modular
personalized products,
design and fabrication
in hands of producer
personal fabrication:
unique products,
design and fabrication
in hands of user,
shared designs
market
influence
non-market
influence
WHAT IS
DISTRIBUTED
PRODUCTION?
control over user/consumer input
scale
large
small
digital
manufacturing
peer-to-peer
production
6. mass fabrication:
transformed supply
chains, elimination of
embodied energy of
redundant
intermediaries
mass customization:
less pre-consumer waste,
greater potential for
re-manufacturing,
eco-guiding configurators
for consumers
bespoke fabrication:
localized production
and lower transport
emissions, less
product replacement
personal fabrication:
localized production,
higher environmental
impact per unit but
overall lower volumes
(than MP and MC)
ENVIRONMENTAL
BENEFITS
exploit user/consumer input
exploit
scale
exploit
modularization
exploit small
and local
ensure quality for
attachment, satisfaction
exploit learning
opportunities
SOURCE: Kohtala, C., 2014.Addressing sustainability in research on distributed production: an integrated literature review.
Journal of Cleaner Production. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.09.039
According to
existing
research
claims, these
are the
environmental
benefits.
7. mass fabrication:
distanced from
consumer recycling
systems and safety
standards, increased
transport of
components and
materials
mass customization:
customized products
add to mass production
material flow rather than
replace
bespoke fabrication:
high quality leads to
resource and energy
intensive production,
difficulty to reuse
bespoke products
personal fabrication:
greater personal
exposure to toxic
materials/emissions,
unregulated emissions
to environment
ENVIRONMENTAL
CONCERNS
regulations and standards
scale
global
local
quality drivers less regulation
SOURCE: Kohtala, C., 2014.Addressing sustainability in research on distributed production: an integrated literature review.
Journal of Cleaner Production. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.09.039
What those
previous
researchers
didnt mention
9. In Fab Labs today,
BARRIERS
>invisibility of issues
>lack of eco-
champions
>time poverty
>situatedness
OPPORTUNITIES
>visions of societal
responsibility
>material
understanding and
time engagement
>openness and
willingness to share
>stepping stone to
new paradigm