際際滷

際際滷Share a Scribd company logo
Anticipatory Change Reactive Change Crisis Change
 Strategic performance is healthy
 The need for change is uncertain
 Internal commitment for change is low
The lack of internal pressure, combined with an
organizational performance that has yet to slide
makes it difficult to sell in any strategic altering or
re-alignment at this stage. Time & resources will
allow the agency to go deeper into the methods
outlined in the reactive change category, but a few
other factors will be important: your key client
contacts credibility within their organization, &
your ability to deliver a strong recommendation.
 Strategic performance is sliding
 Need for change is becoming clear, not certain
 Internal commitment for change is mixed
At this stage, some of the clients team (and
hopefully your key contact) is beginning to see the
need for change, but you still may have to help sell
in the need for strategic direction altering. In
addition to key methods for showing industry,
competitive, consumer and technological shifts, it
will also be important to project multiple future
scenarios for the clients strategy using existing as
the base case.
 Strategic performance is bad
 The need for change is clear by everyone
 Internal commitment for change is high
Fast, focused and decisive action is required at
this stage, as the client is most likely facing
internal and external challenges. The client will be
bringing in an outside change agent, so it will be
an interesting time for the agency to be involved, if
they are even allowed to be. Any agency strategic
engagements must be cognoscente of time and
the clients depleted resources as this stage.
Reactive
change
Crisis
change
Readiness for
change
Time
StrategicPerformance
Anticipatory
change
Strategic capability
@digitalinfant

More Related Content

Org readiness for change

  • 1. Anticipatory Change Reactive Change Crisis Change Strategic performance is healthy The need for change is uncertain Internal commitment for change is low The lack of internal pressure, combined with an organizational performance that has yet to slide makes it difficult to sell in any strategic altering or re-alignment at this stage. Time & resources will allow the agency to go deeper into the methods outlined in the reactive change category, but a few other factors will be important: your key client contacts credibility within their organization, & your ability to deliver a strong recommendation. Strategic performance is sliding Need for change is becoming clear, not certain Internal commitment for change is mixed At this stage, some of the clients team (and hopefully your key contact) is beginning to see the need for change, but you still may have to help sell in the need for strategic direction altering. In addition to key methods for showing industry, competitive, consumer and technological shifts, it will also be important to project multiple future scenarios for the clients strategy using existing as the base case. Strategic performance is bad The need for change is clear by everyone Internal commitment for change is high Fast, focused and decisive action is required at this stage, as the client is most likely facing internal and external challenges. The client will be bringing in an outside change agent, so it will be an interesting time for the agency to be involved, if they are even allowed to be. Any agency strategic engagements must be cognoscente of time and the clients depleted resources as this stage. Reactive change Crisis change Readiness for change Time StrategicPerformance Anticipatory change Strategic capability @digitalinfant