際際滷

際際滷Share a Scribd company logo

Mobile biometric device trends joe hoerl

E
ebuc

This document discusses trends in mobile biometric devices, including: - The increasing demand for mobile identification and the need for smaller fingerprint sensors. - A comparison of fingerprint sensor sizes for smartphones and larger fingerprint capture devices (FAPs). - How fingerprint sensor size affects the ability to perform 1:1 verification and 1:N identification/enrollments. - The potential for using thinner, lighter, and more efficient light-emitting semiconductor (LES) film technology to reduce the size of fingerprint sensors while maintaining image quality and capabilities. - Predictions that future fingerprint collection will incorporate larger capture areas in smaller sizes using thinner-film touch sensors, lower power consumption, and multi-modal biometrics as a standard

1 of 10
Mobile Biometric Device Trends Joe Hoerl Mobile Biometrics joe.hoerl@integratedbiometrics.com Integrated Biometrics, LLC LES is More
Demands for Mobile Identification
Fingerprint Sensor Size Comparison Smartphone FAP10 FAP20 FAP30 FAP45 FAP60 Width (mm) 6.35 12.7 15.24 20.32 40.64 81.28 Height (mm) 6.35 16.51 20.32 25.4 38.1 76.2 Area (mm族) 40.32 209.68 309.68 516.13 1548.38 6193.54 5x 7x 12x1x 1:N Search / Enrollments
Smartphone vs. FAP Sizes Source: NIST Report March 2014 (nvlpubs.nist.gov/nistpubs/ir/2014/NIST.IR.7950.pdf) The smaller platen sensorsapplication in one-to-many (1:N) searching may be premature given the results from this exploratory investigation.
1 Million Citizens 1,900 Voter ID Problems 50% More Recognition Same as FAP30 False Rejection In Large Databases
Mobile ID Fingerprint Use Case & Specifications: Smartphone - 1:1 Verification FAP10 FAP20 - Non-critical 1:N Verification; FAP30-60 1:N Identification and Enrollments
Replace the Prism with LES film Upgrade CIS camera with flat TFT camera Camera sensor PCB USB output USB output Impact of LES on Size of FAP 45 devices
Mobile Biometric Collection Devices
Future of Fingerprint Collection Larger Capture in Smaller Sizes Fingerprint scanners will be TFT based <1mm Larger area scanners within smartphones Reduced power consumption Multi-modal Biometrics as a standard Fingerprint Face Iris 5/11/2015 9 LES is MORE
10 www.integratedbiometrics.com 121 Broadcast Drive; Spartanburg SC 29303 USA

More Related Content

Mobile biometric device trends joe hoerl

  • 1. Mobile Biometric Device Trends Joe Hoerl Mobile Biometrics joe.hoerl@integratedbiometrics.com Integrated Biometrics, LLC LES is More
  • 2. Demands for Mobile Identification
  • 3. Fingerprint Sensor Size Comparison Smartphone FAP10 FAP20 FAP30 FAP45 FAP60 Width (mm) 6.35 12.7 15.24 20.32 40.64 81.28 Height (mm) 6.35 16.51 20.32 25.4 38.1 76.2 Area (mm族) 40.32 209.68 309.68 516.13 1548.38 6193.54 5x 7x 12x1x 1:N Search / Enrollments
  • 4. Smartphone vs. FAP Sizes Source: NIST Report March 2014 (nvlpubs.nist.gov/nistpubs/ir/2014/NIST.IR.7950.pdf) The smaller platen sensorsapplication in one-to-many (1:N) searching may be premature given the results from this exploratory investigation.
  • 5. 1 Million Citizens 1,900 Voter ID Problems 50% More Recognition Same as FAP30 False Rejection In Large Databases
  • 6. Mobile ID Fingerprint Use Case & Specifications: Smartphone - 1:1 Verification FAP10 FAP20 - Non-critical 1:N Verification; FAP30-60 1:N Identification and Enrollments
  • 7. Replace the Prism with LES film Upgrade CIS camera with flat TFT camera Camera sensor PCB USB output USB output Impact of LES on Size of FAP 45 devices
  • 9. Future of Fingerprint Collection Larger Capture in Smaller Sizes Fingerprint scanners will be TFT based <1mm Larger area scanners within smartphones Reduced power consumption Multi-modal Biometrics as a standard Fingerprint Face Iris 5/11/2015 9 LES is MORE