The document discusses the implications of the ANC Policy Conference on land reform in South Africa. Key points include:
- There is a push to scrap the "willing seller, willing buyer" principle for land acquisition and instead expropriate land, including land that was allegedly "stolen", without compensation.
- However, expropriation without compensation would require changing the South African constitution. The conference will focus on acquiring land as cheaply as possible within the current constitutional framework.
- There are concerns that aggressive expropriation could discourage investment and damage agricultural production without proper selection criteria, oversight or a clear plan for redistributed land. Overall the document raises questions around practical implementation of land reform plans discussed
2. Opening: Scrap the willing
seller principle
See 2007-resolutions
Scape goat for failures
Dont want to pay market value
Believe land had been stolen
3. Wont change the constitution
Willing seller not in the constitution
Issue is market value
What can be done within the ambit of the
constitution to acquire as much land as
cheap as possible?
Public purpose vs public interest
Section 25 (3)
4. Section 25(3)
(3) The amount of the compensation and the time and
manner of payment must be just and equitable, reflecting
an equitable balance between the public interest and the
interests of those affected, having regard to all relevant
circumstances, including-
(a) the current use of the property;
(b) the history of the acquisition and use of the
property;
(e) the market value of the property;
(d) the extent of direct state investment and subsidy in
the acquisition and beneficia1 capital improvement of
the property; and
(e) the purpose of the expropriation.
5. Youth League victory
Expropriation without compensation
Where land was stolen
Irregular transfers in deeds office
6. How do you measure value?
How do you implement?
Greenpaper:
Valuer general
LMC
LRMBs
3-tier land ownership model
Restitution & CPA legislation
Tribal land
7. Greenpaper
NAREG
Inclusive process common ownership
Broad consensus exept:
Semi-judicial functions of LMC
Land ceilings
Valuer Generals powers to determine value
Role of think tank
Unintended results such as outflow of
investments
8. Right of first refusal
Alternative to scrapping willing seller
Namibian experience
Conditions in first discussions
Think Tank driven
Nkwintis response
9. More aggressive expropriation
Only 2 in restitution
Willing seller prevail (for now)
Fast, clean, due process
Constitutional
How will we determine which
farms?
10. Scenario
Any farm, any time, any price
Investment and development in freezer
box
We get hurt within the ambit of the
constitution:
Mineral rights
Destruction of value
12. Where to now?
No land audit
No plan with tribal land
Too much under utilised state land
Production discipline on transferred farms
No selection criteria
No plan to finalise land claims
No sunset on horizon no new normal in
sight