ºÝºÝߣ

ºÝºÝߣShare a Scribd company logo
Acute appendicitis
1 STARTING WITH DEFINITION ??
2 SURGICAL ANATOMY
3 ETIOLOGY AND PATHOPHYSIOLOGY
4 TYPES
5 CLINICAL FEATURES
6 OUTCOME
7 DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS
8 SCORING SYSTEM
9 INVESTIGATIONS
10 MANAGEMENT PLAN
11 COMPLICATIONS
12 VIDIO DEMONSTRATION
Appendicitis is inflammation of the appendix and is a
medical emergency.
Many cases of appendicitis require removal of the
inflamed appendix due to the high mortality associated
with rupture of the appendix, which may lead to severe
complications such as peritonitis and sepsis.
Appendicitis was first described by Reginald Fitz in 1886
and is today recognized as one of the most common and
significant causes of severe acute abdominal pain
worldwide.
SITE
VARIOUS POSITIONS
LAYERS
BLOOD SUPPLY
LYMPHATICS
LOCATING APPENDIX
.DIETARY FACTOTRS
.FAMILIAL SUSCEPTIBILITY
.OBSTRUCTION OF LUMEN OF APPENDIX
Obstruction may be caused by 1:
•lymphoid hyperplasia : ~ 60%
•appendicolith : ~ 33%
•foreign bodies : ~ 4%
.OBSTRUCTION OF APPENDICIAL ORIFICE
.ABUSE OF PURGATIVES
.BACTERIAL INFECTION
RISK FACTORS FOR PERFORATION OF
APPENDIX LEADING TO PERITONITIS ?
.EXTREMES OF AGE
.IMMUNOSUPPRESSION
.DIABETES MELLITUS
.FAECOLITH OBSTRUCTION
.PELVIC APPENDIX
.PREVIOUS ABDOMINAL SURGERY
1 ACUTE CATARRHAL ( NON OBSTRUCTIVE )
APPENDICITIS
2 OBSTRUCTIVE ACUTE APPENDICITS
SYMPTOMS
. ABDOMINAL PAIN WHICH SHIFTS
. ANOREXIA
. NAUSEA AND VOMITING
. FEVER
. GASTRIC FUNCTION UPSET ( DIARRHEA AND
CONSTIPATION)
.LOCALIZED TENDERNESS IN RIF
.MUSCLE GUARDING AND RIGIDITY
.POINTING SIGN
.COUGH/DUNPHY’S SIGN
.REBOUND TENDERNESS
.ROVSING’S SIGN
.PSOAS SIGN
.OBTURATOR SIGN
.RESOLUTION
.ULCERATION
.SUPPURATION
.FIBROSIS
.GANGRENE
.PHLEGMONOUS MASS
.APPENDICULAR ABCESS
.MUCOCOELE OF APPENDIX
.GENERAL PERITONITIS
Mainly
composed of
greater
omentum,
edematous
caecal wall,
edematous
portion of small
intestine,
perforated or
otherwise
inflamed
appendix
CHILDREN
ADULTS
ADULT FEMALE
ELDERLY
Acute appendicitis
Tzanakis Scoring
Tzanakis and colleagues, in 2005 published a simplified system, now
called the Tzanakis scoring system for appendicitis, to aid the diagnosis
of appendicitis. It incorporates the presence 4 variables made up of
specific signs and symptoms.
.presence of right lower abdominal tenderness = 4 points
and rebound tenderness = 3 points
.laboratory findings: presence of white blood cells greater than 12,000
in the blood = 2 points
.ultrasound finding: presence of positive ultrasound scan findings of
appendicitis = 6 points
A total score of 15 is the maximum that can be scored. Where a patient
scores 8 or more points, there is greater than 96 percent chance that
appendicitis exists..
1: ROUTINE
FULL BLOOD COUNT
URINANALYSIS
2: SELECTIVE
PREGNANCY TEST
UREA AND ELECTROLYTES
SUPINE ABDOMINAL RADIOGRAPH
ULTRASOUND ABDOMEN/PELVIS
CONTRAST ENHANCED CT SCAN ABDOMEN
ULTRASOUND Findings supportive of the
diagnosis of appendicitis include
•aperistaltic, noncompressible, dilated
appendix ( > 6mm outer diameter)
•distinct appendiceal wall layers
•target appearance (axial section)
•Appendicolith
•periappendiceal fluid collection
•echogenic prominent pericaecal fat
•confirming that the structure visualised is the
appendix is clearly essential and requires
demonstration of it being blind ending and
arising from the base of the caecum
KEEP NPO
START IV FLUIDS
GIVE ANALGESIA FOR SEVER PAIN
ROLE OF ANTIBIOTICS
PLAN SURGERY
CONVENTIONAL APPENDICECTOMY
LAPROSCOPIC APPENDICECTOMY
BASIC STEPS
.G/A GIVEN
.ABDOMEN PREPARED AND DRAPED
INCISION GIVEN OVER McBurney’s
point ( GRID IRON INCISION)
.VARIOUS LAYERS OF ABDOMINAL
WALL OPENED
.MUSCLES SPLIT ALONG LINE OF
ITS FIBERS
.ON ENTERING PERITONEUM
APPENDIX IDENTIFIED ..MOBILIZED
THEN LIGATED AND DIVIDED AT ITS
BASE
.LAYERS OF ABDOMINAL WALL THEN
CLOSED IN TURN
SKIN CLOSSED AND DRESSING DONE
Over the past decade, the outcomes of laparoscopic
appendectomies have compared favorably to those for open
appendectomies because of decreased pain, fewer
postoperative complications, shorter hospitalization, earlier
mobilization, earlier return to work, and better cosmesis.
However, despite these advantages, efforts are still being
made to decrease abdominal incision and visible scars after
laparoscopy
EARLY
LATE
Acute appendicitis

More Related Content

Acute appendicitis

  • 2. 1 STARTING WITH DEFINITION ?? 2 SURGICAL ANATOMY 3 ETIOLOGY AND PATHOPHYSIOLOGY 4 TYPES 5 CLINICAL FEATURES 6 OUTCOME 7 DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS 8 SCORING SYSTEM 9 INVESTIGATIONS 10 MANAGEMENT PLAN 11 COMPLICATIONS 12 VIDIO DEMONSTRATION
  • 3. Appendicitis is inflammation of the appendix and is a medical emergency. Many cases of appendicitis require removal of the inflamed appendix due to the high mortality associated with rupture of the appendix, which may lead to severe complications such as peritonitis and sepsis. Appendicitis was first described by Reginald Fitz in 1886 and is today recognized as one of the most common and significant causes of severe acute abdominal pain worldwide.
  • 5. .DIETARY FACTOTRS .FAMILIAL SUSCEPTIBILITY .OBSTRUCTION OF LUMEN OF APPENDIX Obstruction may be caused by 1: •lymphoid hyperplasia : ~ 60% •appendicolith : ~ 33% •foreign bodies : ~ 4% .OBSTRUCTION OF APPENDICIAL ORIFICE .ABUSE OF PURGATIVES .BACTERIAL INFECTION RISK FACTORS FOR PERFORATION OF APPENDIX LEADING TO PERITONITIS ? .EXTREMES OF AGE .IMMUNOSUPPRESSION .DIABETES MELLITUS .FAECOLITH OBSTRUCTION .PELVIC APPENDIX .PREVIOUS ABDOMINAL SURGERY
  • 6. 1 ACUTE CATARRHAL ( NON OBSTRUCTIVE ) APPENDICITIS 2 OBSTRUCTIVE ACUTE APPENDICITS
  • 7. SYMPTOMS . ABDOMINAL PAIN WHICH SHIFTS . ANOREXIA . NAUSEA AND VOMITING . FEVER . GASTRIC FUNCTION UPSET ( DIARRHEA AND CONSTIPATION)
  • 8. .LOCALIZED TENDERNESS IN RIF .MUSCLE GUARDING AND RIGIDITY .POINTING SIGN .COUGH/DUNPHY’S SIGN .REBOUND TENDERNESS .ROVSING’S SIGN .PSOAS SIGN .OBTURATOR SIGN
  • 9. .RESOLUTION .ULCERATION .SUPPURATION .FIBROSIS .GANGRENE .PHLEGMONOUS MASS .APPENDICULAR ABCESS .MUCOCOELE OF APPENDIX .GENERAL PERITONITIS Mainly composed of greater omentum, edematous caecal wall, edematous portion of small intestine, perforated or otherwise inflamed appendix
  • 12. Tzanakis Scoring Tzanakis and colleagues, in 2005 published a simplified system, now called the Tzanakis scoring system for appendicitis, to aid the diagnosis of appendicitis. It incorporates the presence 4 variables made up of specific signs and symptoms. .presence of right lower abdominal tenderness = 4 points and rebound tenderness = 3 points .laboratory findings: presence of white blood cells greater than 12,000 in the blood = 2 points .ultrasound finding: presence of positive ultrasound scan findings of appendicitis = 6 points A total score of 15 is the maximum that can be scored. Where a patient scores 8 or more points, there is greater than 96 percent chance that appendicitis exists..
  • 13. 1: ROUTINE FULL BLOOD COUNT URINANALYSIS 2: SELECTIVE PREGNANCY TEST UREA AND ELECTROLYTES SUPINE ABDOMINAL RADIOGRAPH ULTRASOUND ABDOMEN/PELVIS CONTRAST ENHANCED CT SCAN ABDOMEN
  • 14. ULTRASOUND Findings supportive of the diagnosis of appendicitis include •aperistaltic, noncompressible, dilated appendix ( > 6mm outer diameter) •distinct appendiceal wall layers •target appearance (axial section) •Appendicolith •periappendiceal fluid collection •echogenic prominent pericaecal fat •confirming that the structure visualised is the appendix is clearly essential and requires demonstration of it being blind ending and arising from the base of the caecum
  • 15. KEEP NPO START IV FLUIDS GIVE ANALGESIA FOR SEVER PAIN ROLE OF ANTIBIOTICS PLAN SURGERY CONVENTIONAL APPENDICECTOMY LAPROSCOPIC APPENDICECTOMY
  • 16. BASIC STEPS .G/A GIVEN .ABDOMEN PREPARED AND DRAPED INCISION GIVEN OVER McBurney’s point ( GRID IRON INCISION) .VARIOUS LAYERS OF ABDOMINAL WALL OPENED .MUSCLES SPLIT ALONG LINE OF ITS FIBERS .ON ENTERING PERITONEUM APPENDIX IDENTIFIED ..MOBILIZED THEN LIGATED AND DIVIDED AT ITS BASE .LAYERS OF ABDOMINAL WALL THEN CLOSED IN TURN SKIN CLOSSED AND DRESSING DONE
  • 17. Over the past decade, the outcomes of laparoscopic appendectomies have compared favorably to those for open appendectomies because of decreased pain, fewer postoperative complications, shorter hospitalization, earlier mobilization, earlier return to work, and better cosmesis. However, despite these advantages, efforts are still being made to decrease abdominal incision and visible scars after laparoscopy