際際滷

際際滷Share a Scribd company logo
Cultural Beacons: Grassroots Indicators of Change | Presented at ICA 2013
Cultural Beacons: Grassroots Indicators of Change | Presented at ICA 2013
Cultural Beacons in Theory
 Trained incapacities
 Tacit knowledge
 Participatory, locally-
relevant methods
Cultural Beacons: Grassroots Indicators of Change | Presented at ICA 2013
Cultural Beacons in Action
 Incorporate Participatory
Practices.
 Embrace Unusual
Suspects.
 Nurture Relationships.
 Share Vision(s) and
Ownership.
 Open Space for the
Unexpected.
Strengths
Challenges
Implications
Questions
ThankYou
 Lucia Dura ldura@utep.edu
 Laurel Feltfelt@usc.edu
 ArvindSinghalasinghal@utep.edu

More Related Content

Cultural Beacons: Grassroots Indicators of Change | Presented at ICA 2013

Editor's Notes

  1. 2009, group empowerment intervention-As the assessment team walked for several kilomenters in the Ugandan bush to see the girls magnificent gardens lush with g-nuts (peanuts), simsim, sunflowers, and more. Two members of the research team pointed out that, along the road, there were whole g-nuts on the ground. Jimmy, a member of the local Save the Children staff, offered a simple explanation: G-nuts on the ground are a sign of abundance. Before, people were so hungry that if there ever was a g-nut on the ground, it would be eaten immediately. Now you also see birds in the campsites. They eat food scraps and, before, they didnt use to come.
  2. the loss of ability to think beyond ones training (p. 7). -therefore, scholars and practitioners design instruments that only seek data on particular contexts, only seek particular kind of data favors the textocentric, often quantitative-issue of expression: literacy (reading and writing); influence of non-native or highly educated backgrounds on word choice; cultural norms around speaking of certain subjects at all (taboo + feelings), trust, power; time and place-Albert Einsteins self-coined mantra was: We can't solve problems by using the same kind of thinking we used when we created them.traditional data-gathering does not wholly capture program-related transformations (Smith, 1999; Shiva, 2005; Dutta & Pal, 2010); non-traditional, non-textual, and participatory forms of knowledge-generation can yield overlooked data; and local wisdoms, enshrined in grassroots epistemologies, can enrich program design and evaluation.
  3. 2002 to 2003,Taru was a media and community-based intervention to create healthy communities in rural India. Taruspurpose was to promote gender equality, reproductive health, caste and communal harmony, and community development. Taru, enjoyed a platonic relationship with a male classmate, Shashikant.PROMPT: photograph and narrate visible signs of change in their communities after active program viewing. Seventeen-year-old Vandanas sartorial choice may reflect her independence perhaps even her defiance of traditional norms. For her companion, Vandana explained: "This is my boy-friend, a boy who is a friend. He studies in my high schoolI feel comfortable talking to him and sharing my thoughts with him. If Taru and Shashikant [a male character] can be good friends, why cant we?" Such reasoning and behavior is revolutionary as, according to community members, this is perhaps the first time in the history of Kamtaul village that a young woman invited a young man to stand beside her and pose for a photograph.These girls are trying to learn to ride a bike. After listening to Taru, girls are changing. By listening to radio these girls learn of new ideas and act on them Mukesh (22)Whether Mukesh independently derived this interpretation or obtained confirmation from the girls is unclear. Thus, his observation toes a potentially problematic line in terms of speaking on behalf of others, particularly those who are lower in status due to ethnicity, gender and/or age. Cultural scorecards, because they consist of participants own accounts, help researchers to avoid this very practice vis-a-vis participants. But in the case of this cultural scorecard, it is a community member himself who might be imputing meaning to the participants story. Researchers can raise participants awareness to this phenomenon and encourage them, as they themselves are modeling, both to respect individuals right to make sense of their own experiences and to seek this input from the people directly involved. Researchers can also appreciate accounts such as Mukeshs as secondary data, thereby recognizing its potential difference from the primary sources as well as its richness as an additional layer of meaning-making.
  4. Whose experiences do these data reflect, and whose voices are absent? What data is collected, and what is not? What data characteristics lend credibility to local wisdom, and what characteristics prompt its dismissal? PMs:Artistic, musical, oral, and visual performances Participatory visualization techniques (e.g., participatory photography and sketching) accompanied by oral narratives The Most Significant Change (MSC) participatory appraisal and asset mapping. Scrutinize likely CB sites: material possessions, natural resources, social behaviors
  5. Turntosomebodynexttoyou and discusswhatyousee as thestrengths, challenges, implications, and questionsyoumayhave.