際際滷

際際滷Share a Scribd company logo

aadesh3.pdf

?
?
M
Mahesh_gmail_KNL Na

This document discusses an online web application for booking metro tickets in Nagpur, Maharashtra, India. It aims to provide information on metro timings, routes, fares, and allow users to view timetables. The system would allow administrators to add stations, trains, routes, update fares, and add other administrators. It seeks to address issues with previous paper-based complaint systems by providing an online portal for users to submit feedback and for administrators to view and respond to complaints. The document reviews similar metro systems in cities like Chennai and Delhi and discusses problems with previous non-online systems like lost files and unnoticed updates.

1 of 5
Download to read offline
Online Metro Ticket Booking Web-Application. Dr. P.M. Chaudhari Head Of Department (HOD), Information Technology (I.T), Aadesh Iwanate, Ajay Patle, Mrunali Patle, Shivani Kuril, Snehal Bhagat. Priyadarshini College Of Engineering, Nagpur Maharashtra. Abstract: - An increase in population has led to the growth of traffic in India. To ease the traffic situation in the country and make travel convenient for the people, the government has introduced the metro rail in many cities. It is a cheap mode of travel, which helps in reducing the energy consumption, is eco-friendly, and is the reason behind the prevention of accidents. The modern design of metro coaches, the stylish appearance of metro stations, and superior comfort facilities are some of the reasons why metro is becoming popular in Indian Keywords: - Nagpur Metro, Fare, Routers, Timetable, Stations QR code Introduction: - This is an integrated service which provide all information about t h emetro rail and its routes for public. Theproposed is an web based application whichprovides information regarding timings, routes, fare. This system manages public feedback about services through it¨s management system.There is also an admin module where admin c an add stations, trains,routes and also updatethe fares. The admin is apanel consisting of a group of authorized persons. Efficient, safe a n d secure transportation networks are the foundation of all m o d e r ncities¨development and substantiality. The mostsought- after intelligent solutions refers to thedeployment of mobilecomputing and connectivity in every part of aninterconnected transportation system. Literature Review A. NAGPUR METRO The existing Nagpur Metro Rail Corporation Limited (NMRCL) which is a joint Special Purpose Vehicle (SPV) of Government of India (GOI) and Government of Maharashtra (GOM), has been reconstituted into Maharashtra MetroRail Corporation Limited (MAHA- METRO) for implementation of all metro projects in the State of Maharashtra outside Mumbai Metropolitan Region. The projectwill benefit from experience and learnings from other Metro Rail projects in Delhi, Bengaluru, Chennai, Kochi, Nagpur etc. B. CHENNAI METRO RAIL
S. Vydhianathan (2003) discussed the initially elevated metro rail transport system in Chennai. The metro system has advanced stations comforts, elevators at platforms, lifts for the crippled and the aged. Chennai MRTS ought to be the most appealing travel choice in a metro city that has more than 20 lakh vehicles out and about, congested driving conditions, number of mishaps recorded and rising air contamination. In spite, there are rare commuters in a three- coach train and the stations remain deserted C it¨s as if the city has for all intents and purposes denied its presence. In spite of the speculation of Rs.20,000 crores, there are no obvious positive returns. Commuters declines to increase, however the local city transports run packed. The time is fortunate to at the end of the day audit the whole approach towards urban transportation issues and concoct a joined methodology towards a rail and road system. Numerous reasons have been credited to the Chennai Metro Rail Transit System as yet remaining a non-starter. The two key reasons appear to have been the higher fare structure further more C. DELHI METRO RAIL A metro rail-based system was prescribed by RITES, containing a network of surface, underground and raised corridors accumulating to 213 kms, to stay aware of the traffic demand up to the year 2021. The entire task expense was assessed at Rs. 15000 Crores according to 1996 value level. The system at present handles 2.4 million commuters daily. The first and second phases of Delhi metro have been finished. The DMRC site demonstrates various advantages of metro. These are: time spared by the workers, Reduction in accidents, reduced fuel consumption, dependable and safe travel, reduced atmospheric pollution, reduced operating expense of vehicles and increase in the normal vehicular. speed. This paper exhibits an assessment and analysis of the advantages asserted by the Delhi metro. Comparable advantages were additionally expected during the planning phases of Kolkata and Chennai metro rail systems. Nonetheless, the execution of metro system in both these urban communities has not satisfied the desires. Problem Definition The problem occurred before having online system includes: 1. File lost When online system is not implemented the complaints are reported in files. The files are always lost due to some human errors. 2. Most updations are unnoticeable Admin This feature allows the admin to view and reply to complaints. Admin can add stations, route, train. Admin can also add and update fare details, and even add a new admin. Actually, the admin is a panel consisting of a group of authorized persons. Functional Requirements The system must allow admin to add train, station, routes, fare, metro timetable and even add a new admin. The system must also allow admin to reply to the complaints
send by the user. Functional Requirements System must allow the users to enter the source station and destination stations. The system should be designed in such a way that only authorized people should be allowed to access some particular modules. The records should be modified by only administrators and no one else. User Figure 2. User Module This module contains various facilities like view time chart between two stations. This feature allows the users to view the metro timetable. Users are required to enter the source station and destination station, when they enter the data then the system will show the metro time table. Functional Requirements System must allow the users to enter the source station and destination stations. System must be able to process information from database. CONCLUSION The system has been developed with much care and free of errors and at the same time it is efficient and less timeconsuming. The purpose of this project was to develop a web application for metro rail management. This project helped us in gaining valuable information and practical knowledge REFERENCES 1. Design Basis Report of Bangalore Metro Phase I (2003). Bangalore Metro Rail Corporation Limited. Bangalore. 2. "Mumbai Local train timetable 2016. Western, Central, Harbour, Thane vashi. BEST, NMMT, TMT Bus routes. Indian Railways schedule". mindicator.mobond.com. 3. "books on the Delhi metro. Word press.com, non-profit organization, New Delhi hurting Sharma & Tarun Chauhan 4. "www.kolkatarail.com,Kolkat a Metropolitan Area, India Kavi Subhash (south)Noapara (north) with an extension to Dakshineswar (north)". 5. Detailed Project Report of Bangalore Metro Phase I (2003). Bangalore Metro Rail Corporation Limited. Bangalore. 6. Sharma, N., S. Gangopadhyay, and R. Dhyani, (2010), ｀Methodology for Estimation of CO2 Reduction from Mass Rapid Transit System (MRTS) Projects¨, Journal of Scientific and Industrial Research, 69(8): 586 C93. 7. Sreedharan, E. (2008), ｀Underground Cost Won¨t Let Metro Go Too Far¨. Available online at http://articles.times - ofindia.indiatimes.com, accessed on 29 November 2008. 8. The Hindu (2011), ｀Delhi Cabinet Nod for Metro Rail¨. Available online at www.thehindu.com, accessed on 12 April
2011. 9. Advani, M. and G. Tiwari (2005), Evaluation of Public Transport Systems: Case Study of Delhi Metro. START Conference Proceedings, IIT C Kharagpur, India, pp. 575 C 83. (2007), ｀Understanding the Metro Rail Demand¨, in Prabha Shastri Ranade (ed.), Technology in Rail Transport Management, pp. 184 C93. India: The ICFAI University Press. 10. Chakraborty, D. (2010), Mumbai Residents Oppose Elevated Metro Corridors. Available online at http://www.projectsmonitor. com/ corridors, accessed in January 2011. 11. Cox, W. (2000), ｀Urban Rail: Uses and Misuses¨. The Public Purpose. Available online at www.publicpurpose.com, accessed in March 2011. 12. Cox, W. and R. D. Utt (2010), ｀Towards Creating Sustainable Transit¨. Heritage Foundation. Available online at www.heritage.org/Research/ Reports/2010/06/, accessed in March 2011. 13. DIMTS (2011), Delhi BRT System ！ Lessons Learnt. Available online at www.dimts.in, accessed in January 2011.Delhi Metro Rail Corporation (2011), Available online at http://www.delhimetrorail.co m 14. Fly ybjerg, B, M.K.S. Holm and S.L. Buhl (2006), ｀Inaccuracy in Traffic Forecasts¨, Transport Reviews, 26(1): 1 C 24. 15. Fouracre, P., C. Drunkerley and G. Gardner (2003), ｀Mass Rapid Transit Systems For Cities In the Developing World¨, Transport Reviews, 23(3) 16. Ghosh, S. and S. L. Dhingra (2008), Critical Comparison of Various MRTS Systems and Viability for Implementation. Proceedings of the International Conference on Best Practices to Relieve Congestion on Mixed Traffic Streets In Developing Countries, IIT Madras, Chennai, India, 12C14 September 2008, pp. 87C98. 17. Hindustan Times (2010), ｀Metro: The Complete Picture¨. Available online at www.hindustantimes.com/, accessed on 4 September 2010. 18. Kumar, S. (2011), ｀Overview of Rail Transit System and Experience of Delhi Metro¨. Available online at http://www.delhimetro.com, accessed in March 2011. 19. Litman, T. (2009), Rail Transit In America: A Comprehensive Evaluation of Benefits. Report by Victoria Transport Policy Institute. Available online at www.vtpi.org, accessed in March 2011.！！！ (2010), Evaluating Rail Transit Criticism. Report by Victoria Transport Policy Institute. Available online at www.vtpi.org, accessed in March 2011. 20. Murty, M. N., K. K. Dhavala, M. Ghosh and R. Singh (2006), Social Cost-Benefit Analysis of Delhi Metro. Available online at http://mpra.ub, accessed March 2011. 21. O¨Toole, R. (2010), Defining Success: The Case against Rail Transit. Available online at www.cato.org, accessed in March 2011. 22. [17] Pandit, A. (2009), ｀109 Workers died at DMRC Sites¨. Available online at http://articles.timesofindia.in diatimes.com, accessed on 23 October 2009. 23. RITES (1995), Integrated Multi-modal Mass Rapid Transport System for Delhi, Economic Analysis for Modified First Phase. Gurgaon, Haryana.Sekar, S.P. and Karthigeyan (2009), ｀A Study on the Development Trends Along the Proposed Chennai Metro Rail Corridor¨, Institute of Town Planners, India Journal, 6(4): 41C61.
aadesh3.pdf

More Related Content

aadesh3.pdf

  • 1. Online Metro Ticket Booking Web-Application. Dr. P.M. Chaudhari Head Of Department (HOD), Information Technology (I.T), Aadesh Iwanate, Ajay Patle, Mrunali Patle, Shivani Kuril, Snehal Bhagat. Priyadarshini College Of Engineering, Nagpur Maharashtra. Abstract: - An increase in population has led to the growth of traffic in India. To ease the traffic situation in the country and make travel convenient for the people, the government has introduced the metro rail in many cities. It is a cheap mode of travel, which helps in reducing the energy consumption, is eco-friendly, and is the reason behind the prevention of accidents. The modern design of metro coaches, the stylish appearance of metro stations, and superior comfort facilities are some of the reasons why metro is becoming popular in Indian Keywords: - Nagpur Metro, Fare, Routers, Timetable, Stations QR code Introduction: - This is an integrated service which provide all information about t h emetro rail and its routes for public. Theproposed is an web based application whichprovides information regarding timings, routes, fare. This system manages public feedback about services through it¨s management system.There is also an admin module where admin c an add stations, trains,routes and also updatethe fares. The admin is apanel consisting of a group of authorized persons. Efficient, safe a n d secure transportation networks are the foundation of all m o d e r ncities¨development and substantiality. The mostsought- after intelligent solutions refers to thedeployment of mobilecomputing and connectivity in every part of aninterconnected transportation system. Literature Review A. NAGPUR METRO The existing Nagpur Metro Rail Corporation Limited (NMRCL) which is a joint Special Purpose Vehicle (SPV) of Government of India (GOI) and Government of Maharashtra (GOM), has been reconstituted into Maharashtra MetroRail Corporation Limited (MAHA- METRO) for implementation of all metro projects in the State of Maharashtra outside Mumbai Metropolitan Region. The projectwill benefit from experience and learnings from other Metro Rail projects in Delhi, Bengaluru, Chennai, Kochi, Nagpur etc. B. CHENNAI METRO RAIL
  • 2. S. Vydhianathan (2003) discussed the initially elevated metro rail transport system in Chennai. The metro system has advanced stations comforts, elevators at platforms, lifts for the crippled and the aged. Chennai MRTS ought to be the most appealing travel choice in a metro city that has more than 20 lakh vehicles out and about, congested driving conditions, number of mishaps recorded and rising air contamination. In spite, there are rare commuters in a three- coach train and the stations remain deserted C it¨s as if the city has for all intents and purposes denied its presence. In spite of the speculation of Rs.20,000 crores, there are no obvious positive returns. Commuters declines to increase, however the local city transports run packed. The time is fortunate to at the end of the day audit the whole approach towards urban transportation issues and concoct a joined methodology towards a rail and road system. Numerous reasons have been credited to the Chennai Metro Rail Transit System as yet remaining a non-starter. The two key reasons appear to have been the higher fare structure further more C. DELHI METRO RAIL A metro rail-based system was prescribed by RITES, containing a network of surface, underground and raised corridors accumulating to 213 kms, to stay aware of the traffic demand up to the year 2021. The entire task expense was assessed at Rs. 15000 Crores according to 1996 value level. The system at present handles 2.4 million commuters daily. The first and second phases of Delhi metro have been finished. The DMRC site demonstrates various advantages of metro. These are: time spared by the workers, Reduction in accidents, reduced fuel consumption, dependable and safe travel, reduced atmospheric pollution, reduced operating expense of vehicles and increase in the normal vehicular. speed. This paper exhibits an assessment and analysis of the advantages asserted by the Delhi metro. Comparable advantages were additionally expected during the planning phases of Kolkata and Chennai metro rail systems. Nonetheless, the execution of metro system in both these urban communities has not satisfied the desires. Problem Definition The problem occurred before having online system includes: 1. File lost When online system is not implemented the complaints are reported in files. The files are always lost due to some human errors. 2. Most updations are unnoticeable Admin This feature allows the admin to view and reply to complaints. Admin can add stations, route, train. Admin can also add and update fare details, and even add a new admin. Actually, the admin is a panel consisting of a group of authorized persons. Functional Requirements The system must allow admin to add train, station, routes, fare, metro timetable and even add a new admin. The system must also allow admin to reply to the complaints
  • 3. send by the user. Functional Requirements System must allow the users to enter the source station and destination stations. The system should be designed in such a way that only authorized people should be allowed to access some particular modules. The records should be modified by only administrators and no one else. User Figure 2. User Module This module contains various facilities like view time chart between two stations. This feature allows the users to view the metro timetable. Users are required to enter the source station and destination station, when they enter the data then the system will show the metro time table. Functional Requirements System must allow the users to enter the source station and destination stations. System must be able to process information from database. CONCLUSION The system has been developed with much care and free of errors and at the same time it is efficient and less timeconsuming. The purpose of this project was to develop a web application for metro rail management. This project helped us in gaining valuable information and practical knowledge REFERENCES 1. Design Basis Report of Bangalore Metro Phase I (2003). Bangalore Metro Rail Corporation Limited. Bangalore. 2. "Mumbai Local train timetable 2016. Western, Central, Harbour, Thane vashi. BEST, NMMT, TMT Bus routes. Indian Railways schedule". mindicator.mobond.com. 3. "books on the Delhi metro. Word press.com, non-profit organization, New Delhi hurting Sharma & Tarun Chauhan 4. "www.kolkatarail.com,Kolkat a Metropolitan Area, India Kavi Subhash (south)Noapara (north) with an extension to Dakshineswar (north)". 5. Detailed Project Report of Bangalore Metro Phase I (2003). Bangalore Metro Rail Corporation Limited. Bangalore. 6. Sharma, N., S. Gangopadhyay, and R. Dhyani, (2010), ｀Methodology for Estimation of CO2 Reduction from Mass Rapid Transit System (MRTS) Projects¨, Journal of Scientific and Industrial Research, 69(8): 586 C93. 7. Sreedharan, E. (2008), ｀Underground Cost Won¨t Let Metro Go Too Far¨. Available online at http://articles.times - ofindia.indiatimes.com, accessed on 29 November 2008. 8. The Hindu (2011), ｀Delhi Cabinet Nod for Metro Rail¨. Available online at www.thehindu.com, accessed on 12 April
  • 4. 2011. 9. Advani, M. and G. Tiwari (2005), Evaluation of Public Transport Systems: Case Study of Delhi Metro. START Conference Proceedings, IIT C Kharagpur, India, pp. 575 C 83. (2007), ｀Understanding the Metro Rail Demand¨, in Prabha Shastri Ranade (ed.), Technology in Rail Transport Management, pp. 184 C93. India: The ICFAI University Press. 10. Chakraborty, D. (2010), Mumbai Residents Oppose Elevated Metro Corridors. Available online at http://www.projectsmonitor. com/ corridors, accessed in January 2011. 11. Cox, W. (2000), ｀Urban Rail: Uses and Misuses¨. The Public Purpose. Available online at www.publicpurpose.com, accessed in March 2011. 12. Cox, W. and R. D. Utt (2010), ｀Towards Creating Sustainable Transit¨. Heritage Foundation. Available online at www.heritage.org/Research/ Reports/2010/06/, accessed in March 2011. 13. DIMTS (2011), Delhi BRT System ！ Lessons Learnt. Available online at www.dimts.in, accessed in January 2011.Delhi Metro Rail Corporation (2011), Available online at http://www.delhimetrorail.co m 14. Fly ybjerg, B, M.K.S. Holm and S.L. Buhl (2006), ｀Inaccuracy in Traffic Forecasts¨, Transport Reviews, 26(1): 1 C 24. 15. Fouracre, P., C. Drunkerley and G. Gardner (2003), ｀Mass Rapid Transit Systems For Cities In the Developing World¨, Transport Reviews, 23(3) 16. Ghosh, S. and S. L. Dhingra (2008), Critical Comparison of Various MRTS Systems and Viability for Implementation. Proceedings of the International Conference on Best Practices to Relieve Congestion on Mixed Traffic Streets In Developing Countries, IIT Madras, Chennai, India, 12C14 September 2008, pp. 87C98. 17. Hindustan Times (2010), ｀Metro: The Complete Picture¨. Available online at www.hindustantimes.com/, accessed on 4 September 2010. 18. Kumar, S. (2011), ｀Overview of Rail Transit System and Experience of Delhi Metro¨. Available online at http://www.delhimetro.com, accessed in March 2011. 19. Litman, T. (2009), Rail Transit In America: A Comprehensive Evaluation of Benefits. Report by Victoria Transport Policy Institute. Available online at www.vtpi.org, accessed in March 2011.！！！ (2010), Evaluating Rail Transit Criticism. Report by Victoria Transport Policy Institute. Available online at www.vtpi.org, accessed in March 2011. 20. Murty, M. N., K. K. Dhavala, M. Ghosh and R. Singh (2006), Social Cost-Benefit Analysis of Delhi Metro. Available online at http://mpra.ub, accessed March 2011. 21. O¨Toole, R. (2010), Defining Success: The Case against Rail Transit. Available online at www.cato.org, accessed in March 2011. 22. [17] Pandit, A. (2009), ｀109 Workers died at DMRC Sites¨. Available online at http://articles.timesofindia.in diatimes.com, accessed on 23 October 2009. 23. RITES (1995), Integrated Multi-modal Mass Rapid Transport System for Delhi, Economic Analysis for Modified First Phase. Gurgaon, Haryana.Sekar, S.P. and Karthigeyan (2009), ｀A Study on the Development Trends Along the Proposed Chennai Metro Rail Corridor¨, Institute of Town Planners, India Journal, 6(4): 41C61.