際際滷

際際滷Share a Scribd company logo
Heather Weiler

 SPED 5050-Applied Behavior Analysis II




Changing Hoarding
    Behavior
Abstract
This study was designed to determine an effective teaching
strategy to decrease hoarding behavior for students with
severe disabilities. The target behavior, hoarding, is defined
as bringing an excessive amount of nonessential items to
school which were never used. A multiple baseline design
was used to determine if the teaching strategy selected
would change the hoarding as well as arrival punctuality.
The teaching strategy selected is based on the cognitive
linguistic research of Paul Bloom, Dan Slobin, and Melissa
Bowerman. The specific research was from the intervention
study for categorization acquisition by Partyka and
Krescheck (1983) By teaching meaning of words within a
positive communicative context, the student will gain
organization and comfort to facilitate transition across
physical settings. The results indicated the intervention
decreased the hoarding but had no effect on arrival time.
Subject
17 year old high school student with severe
deficits in cognitive and language

5 year history of hoarding for food and nonfood
items

When limits are set student becomes aggressive

Sleep cycles are inconsistent. When not
sleeping at night, foraging for items occurs

School Arrival time late over 90% of days

Most problematic early morning and late night
and transitioning physical settings
Functional Assessment Interview
                Results
Functional Assessment Interview Form ONeil et al

High Priority Problematic Behavior Hoarding Items

Predictors
     Time of Day
     Moving from on Location to another
     Free Time
     Unsupervised Time

                                                     Immediate Antecedents
     Leaving house
     Change in schedule

                                                Maintaining Consequences
     delays transition
     obtains home based items
     avoids loss of personal possessions

                                                                  Reinforcer
                          Toys    CDs
     Food
Hypothesis
The target behavior of hoarding increases when
there is a change in structure

1. Physical setting

2. Low to No Structure Activity

It is hypothesized that the hoarding behavior
      functions to bring meaning and a comforting
      structure to the situation

An effective replacement or competing
   behavior would be bringing those objects
   related to the immediate context.
Research Design
   Selection
Multiple Baseline

1. Items brought to School

2. School related objects

3. School Unrelated Objects

4. Arrival Punctuality

   The project looked at these variables to
   determine the relationship change between
   objects and punctuality following a
   behavioral teaching intervention
Intervention Strategy
         Procedure
Upon classroom entry, teacher engages using a
positive and enthusiastic attitude.

Student is given a box with name on it.

Student is instructed to name each item and place
it in the box as teacher records them on a list

As each item is named, the teacher provides two
attributes for the item. One includes its use
(function) within the educational setting.

The teacher asks, Do you need this for school?

Student responds yes/no or by nod

Teacher then summarizes every item aloud from
the list and notes ones that are not school related
and then those that are.

Student puts the box in a cubby within eyesight.
Research Basis


Paul Bloom (2000)
      How Children Learn the Meaning of Words

Melissa Bowerman (2001)
      Shaping the Meaning for Language

Partyka and Krescheck (1983)
      A Comparison of Categorization Skills of Normal and
      Language Delayed Children in School

Dan L. Slobin (2001)
      Form- function relationships:
      how do children find out what they are?
Data Collection
  Procedure

Data taken daily upon arrival

Data was a listing of all items brought

Date recorded for arrival time

Data taken for 32 days
Results
Baseline:

 Number of Objects ranged from 22  25

All objects were nonrelated to school

Student never initiated any interaction with
objects during school day

Intervention Phase:

Decrease in Objects

first presentation of procedure resulted

            in a decrease from 24 objects to 8

Increase in School Related Objects

            0% to 95%
Replacement Behavior
                                     Change

                                Changes in Transitional Objects for Attending School

                          30




                          25




                          20
Number of Objects Daily




                          15
                                                                                       Unrelated Objects


                                                                                       School Related
                                                                                       Objects
                          10




                          5




                          0



                                              Dates
Behavior Trends
   Table 1
Number of Objects




                                 10
                                           15
                                                   20
                                                                                                                                                   30




                                                        25




                       0
                           5




        -5
             1/26/09
             1/28/09
             1/30/09
              2/1/09
              2/3/09
              2/5/09
              2/7/09
              2/9/09
             2/11/09
             2/13/09




dates
             2/15/09
             2/17/09
             2/19/09
             2/21/09
             2/23/09
             2/25/09
             2/27/09
                                                                                                                                                                                                     Trends in Object Types




              3/1/09
              3/3/09
              3/5/09
              3/7/09
              3/9/09
             3/11/09
                                                                                                                                                                                             # of Objects




             3/13/09
                                                                                                                                                Unrelated Objects




             3/15/09
                                                                                                                        Linear (# of Objects)
                                                                                                                                                                    School Related Objects




             3/17/09
                                                         Linear (Unrelated Objects)




             3/19/09
                                                                                      Linear (School Related Objects)
Number of minutes late




                                                         100
                                                                                         120




                      20
                               40
                                                    80




                                          60




                  0
        1/26/09
        1/28/09
        1/30/09
         2/1/09
         2/3/09
         2/5/09
         2/7/09
         2/9/09
        2/11/09
        2/13/09
        2/15/09
        2/17/09
        2/19/09
        2/21/09




Dates
        2/23/09
        2/25/09
        2/27/09
         3/1/09
                                                                                                                                                                                 Punctuality




         3/3/09
         3/5/09
         3/7/09
         3/9/09
        3/11/09
                                                                                                                                                                      Relationship of Objects to Arrival

                                                                                                              Relationship between Arrival Time and Objects Brought




        3/13/09
        3/15/09
        3/17/09
        3/19/09
                                                                                                       late




                                                               Linear (late)
                                                                                                                                   # of Objects




                                                                               Linear (# of Objects)
Results
Relationship Changes
1. Overall Number of Items Decreased
2. Inverse Relationship for Related to
   Unrelated Items
        As School Related Items Increased
        Unrelated Objects Decreased
3.    No relationship change resulted for
     Arrival Time and Objects Brought
Implications
 The teaching intervention was effective in changing the
problematic behavior to the targeted replacement behavior

Another analysis to determine another strategy for changing
the punctuality needs to be completed

Use of positive reinforcement in combination with a cognitive
linguistic intervention technique should be explored for other
students with cognitive and language limitations who display
hoarding behavior or delaying behaviors during transition

Further study into the excessive collection of items to determine
whether there is a difference between the DSM IV diagnosis of
hoarding and those who collect items due to a lack of
organization for relevancy due to limited cognitive and linguistic
reasoning strategies

Further study into hoarding (DSM IV) versus transitional object
use in adolescence and students with significant disabilities

More Related Content

Behavior Change Study

  • 1. Heather Weiler SPED 5050-Applied Behavior Analysis II Changing Hoarding Behavior
  • 2. Abstract This study was designed to determine an effective teaching strategy to decrease hoarding behavior for students with severe disabilities. The target behavior, hoarding, is defined as bringing an excessive amount of nonessential items to school which were never used. A multiple baseline design was used to determine if the teaching strategy selected would change the hoarding as well as arrival punctuality. The teaching strategy selected is based on the cognitive linguistic research of Paul Bloom, Dan Slobin, and Melissa Bowerman. The specific research was from the intervention study for categorization acquisition by Partyka and Krescheck (1983) By teaching meaning of words within a positive communicative context, the student will gain organization and comfort to facilitate transition across physical settings. The results indicated the intervention decreased the hoarding but had no effect on arrival time.
  • 3. Subject 17 year old high school student with severe deficits in cognitive and language 5 year history of hoarding for food and nonfood items When limits are set student becomes aggressive Sleep cycles are inconsistent. When not sleeping at night, foraging for items occurs School Arrival time late over 90% of days Most problematic early morning and late night and transitioning physical settings
  • 4. Functional Assessment Interview Results Functional Assessment Interview Form ONeil et al High Priority Problematic Behavior Hoarding Items Predictors Time of Day Moving from on Location to another Free Time Unsupervised Time Immediate Antecedents Leaving house Change in schedule Maintaining Consequences delays transition obtains home based items avoids loss of personal possessions Reinforcer Toys CDs Food
  • 5. Hypothesis The target behavior of hoarding increases when there is a change in structure 1. Physical setting 2. Low to No Structure Activity It is hypothesized that the hoarding behavior functions to bring meaning and a comforting structure to the situation An effective replacement or competing behavior would be bringing those objects related to the immediate context.
  • 6. Research Design Selection Multiple Baseline 1. Items brought to School 2. School related objects 3. School Unrelated Objects 4. Arrival Punctuality The project looked at these variables to determine the relationship change between objects and punctuality following a behavioral teaching intervention
  • 7. Intervention Strategy Procedure Upon classroom entry, teacher engages using a positive and enthusiastic attitude. Student is given a box with name on it. Student is instructed to name each item and place it in the box as teacher records them on a list As each item is named, the teacher provides two attributes for the item. One includes its use (function) within the educational setting. The teacher asks, Do you need this for school? Student responds yes/no or by nod Teacher then summarizes every item aloud from the list and notes ones that are not school related and then those that are. Student puts the box in a cubby within eyesight.
  • 8. Research Basis Paul Bloom (2000) How Children Learn the Meaning of Words Melissa Bowerman (2001) Shaping the Meaning for Language Partyka and Krescheck (1983) A Comparison of Categorization Skills of Normal and Language Delayed Children in School Dan L. Slobin (2001) Form- function relationships: how do children find out what they are?
  • 9. Data Collection Procedure Data taken daily upon arrival Data was a listing of all items brought Date recorded for arrival time Data taken for 32 days
  • 10. Results Baseline: Number of Objects ranged from 22 25 All objects were nonrelated to school Student never initiated any interaction with objects during school day Intervention Phase: Decrease in Objects first presentation of procedure resulted in a decrease from 24 objects to 8 Increase in School Related Objects 0% to 95%
  • 11. Replacement Behavior Change Changes in Transitional Objects for Attending School 30 25 20 Number of Objects Daily 15 Unrelated Objects School Related Objects 10 5 0 Dates
  • 12. Behavior Trends Table 1
  • 13. Number of Objects 10 15 20 30 25 0 5 -5 1/26/09 1/28/09 1/30/09 2/1/09 2/3/09 2/5/09 2/7/09 2/9/09 2/11/09 2/13/09 dates 2/15/09 2/17/09 2/19/09 2/21/09 2/23/09 2/25/09 2/27/09 Trends in Object Types 3/1/09 3/3/09 3/5/09 3/7/09 3/9/09 3/11/09 # of Objects 3/13/09 Unrelated Objects 3/15/09 Linear (# of Objects) School Related Objects 3/17/09 Linear (Unrelated Objects) 3/19/09 Linear (School Related Objects)
  • 14. Number of minutes late 100 120 20 40 80 60 0 1/26/09 1/28/09 1/30/09 2/1/09 2/3/09 2/5/09 2/7/09 2/9/09 2/11/09 2/13/09 2/15/09 2/17/09 2/19/09 2/21/09 Dates 2/23/09 2/25/09 2/27/09 3/1/09 Punctuality 3/3/09 3/5/09 3/7/09 3/9/09 3/11/09 Relationship of Objects to Arrival Relationship between Arrival Time and Objects Brought 3/13/09 3/15/09 3/17/09 3/19/09 late Linear (late) # of Objects Linear (# of Objects)
  • 15. Results Relationship Changes 1. Overall Number of Items Decreased 2. Inverse Relationship for Related to Unrelated Items As School Related Items Increased Unrelated Objects Decreased 3. No relationship change resulted for Arrival Time and Objects Brought
  • 16. Implications The teaching intervention was effective in changing the problematic behavior to the targeted replacement behavior Another analysis to determine another strategy for changing the punctuality needs to be completed Use of positive reinforcement in combination with a cognitive linguistic intervention technique should be explored for other students with cognitive and language limitations who display hoarding behavior or delaying behaviors during transition Further study into the excessive collection of items to determine whether there is a difference between the DSM IV diagnosis of hoarding and those who collect items due to a lack of organization for relevancy due to limited cognitive and linguistic reasoning strategies Further study into hoarding (DSM IV) versus transitional object use in adolescence and students with significant disabilities