The document summarizes the history and structure of a Pedestrian & Bicycle Transportation course at UC Berkeley. It began in the 1990s but was not taught for 5 years until students organized to have it offered again in 2007. It is run as a student-taught course with support from a faculty sponsor. The course aims to educate future professionals on best practices, critical thinking, and credibility in the field. Typical classes involve a topic presentation, readings discussion, and guest speakers from agencies and organizations. Student projects have analyzed safety and designs. Feedback indicates the course provides valuable real-world learning but challenges include balancing topics and scheduling with students' busy schedules.
1 of 18
Download to read offline
More Related Content
Session #71 - UC Berkeley Ped & Bike Class - Schneider & Carlton
1. UC Berkeley Pedestrian & Bicycle Transportation Class Robert Schneider & Rebecca Sanders Carlton ProWalk/ProBike Panel Session September 16, 2010
2. How did the course get started? Pedestrian & bicycle course offered by DCRP faculty every 2-3 years in the 1990s Course not taught for at least 5 years Prior assumption of department: Not enough interest from students ~15 masters students organized in Fall 2007 to push for course No dept. faculty available to teach course
3. How did the course get started? Student-taught course in City Planning Department Department concerns: Will course meet university standards? Student leader must have faculty sponsor Course should not burden the faculty sponsor Faculty should be invited to speak/monitor course No $$$, but credits for student leader Does student leader have enough expertise & time?
4. Course Purpose Educate current/future professionals Learn about the state of the practice Think critically about current methods & research needs Improve the credibility of the pedestrian & bicycle field Not an advocacy course
5. Course Structure 2- or 3-hour class, once per week Readings that should be on the shelf of a ped/bike professional Course wiki space http://cp298pedbiketranspo.wikispaces.com/ Class project & assignments
7. Typical Class Structure Presentation on weekly topic Discussion of readings & issues Guest lecturer/discussant Government agencies Consultants Researchers Advocacy organizations
8. Student interests (2008-2010) Cultural change needed to get more people bicycling (and walking); public health connection Innovative pedestrian & bicycle facility designs Numbers to show benefits of ped/bike transpo. Pedestrian, bicycle, driver behaviors Perceptions of safety and risk, Safety in numbers
9. Example student projects Safety evaluation of Masonic Ave. (SF) Safety of I-880 interchange crossings (Fremont, CA) Hudson River Greenway & 9 th Avenue Cycle Track (NYC) Efforts to increase walking & bicycling (NYC) Bus stop area bicycle lane design How-To Guide to Bicycle Parking Complete streets & physical activity Idaho Stop as Yield Law Bicycle Sharing Programs SRTS Local School Project Taylor Reiss, 2010 Alia Anderson, 2008
10. Intersection Redesign Final assignment Field experience Work in groups Professional-style presentation Meredith Glaser, Troy Reinhalter, & Nicole Schneider, 2010
14. Course Changes (2008-2010) 2 credits to 3 credits Fewer required readings More detailed assignment instructions Evening to mid-day, back to evening Panels of professionals More legal background & behavioral issues More international examples Paid student instructors
15. What the Students Say Class was a lot of work for a Pass/Fail course. Wish this had been required for transportation concentration. I ended up dropping it and just sitting in. The 3-hour course from 5-8 p.m. was a bit tough. At timesthe course moved too slowly. Have less reliance on guest speakers. Would like more time for discussion. In-class time to work on intersection redesign.
16. What the Students Say Having lecture and guest speaker every week mixes it up nicely & offers a variety of perspectives. Liked the real world focused projects and the walking tour. Liked that we are learning cutting-edge stuff. It covered a topic that the department desperately needed. Liked the discussions where we actually disagreed. One of the best classes Ive taken here. And, it got me a job.
17. Course Challenges Balancing core competencies and instructor strengths Scheduling guest lecturers Balancing lecture, discussion, and assignment time Encouraging students to prioritize the class Long-term vision for course Taught by full-time professor Instituted into planning & engineering curriculum