ºÝºÝߣshows by User: GiovanniDamele / http://www.slideshare.net/images/logo.gif ºÝºÝߣshows by User: GiovanniDamele / Tue, 14 May 2019 08:21:25 GMT ºÝºÝߣShare feed for ºÝºÝߣshows by User: GiovanniDamele Retorica mediatizada2019 /slideshow/retorica-mediatizada2019/145463244 retoricamediatizada2019-190514082125
Confer¨ºncia Ret¨®rica Mediatizada]]>
Confer¨ºncia Ret¨®rica Mediatizada]]> Tue, 14 May 2019 08:21:25 GMT /slideshow/retorica-mediatizada2019/145463244 GiovanniDamele@slideshare.net(GiovanniDamele) Retorica mediatizada2019 GiovanniDamele Confer¨ºncia Ret¨®rica Mediatizada <img style="border:1px solid #C3E6D8;float:right;" alt="" src="https://cdn.slidesharecdn.com/ss_thumbnails/retoricamediatizada2019-190514082125-thumbnail.jpg?width=120&amp;height=120&amp;fit=bounds" /><br> Confer¨ºncia Ret¨®rica Mediatizada
Retorica mediatizada2019 from Giovanni Damele
]]> 55 2 https://cdn.slidesharecdn.com/ss_thumbnails/retoricamediatizada2019-190514082125-thumbnail.jpg?width=120&height=120&fit=bounds presentation Black http://activitystrea.ms/schema/1.0/post http://activitystrea.ms/schema/1.0/posted 0 Traditional fallacies hamblin /slideshow/traditional-fallacies-hamblin/145463096 traditionalfallacieshamblin-190514082034
Aula ReA - Hamblin]]>
Aula ReA - Hamblin]]> Tue, 14 May 2019 08:20:34 GMT /slideshow/traditional-fallacies-hamblin/145463096 GiovanniDamele@slideshare.net(GiovanniDamele) Traditional fallacies hamblin GiovanniDamele Aula ReA - Hamblin <img style="border:1px solid #C3E6D8;float:right;" alt="" src="https://cdn.slidesharecdn.com/ss_thumbnails/traditionalfallacieshamblin-190514082034-thumbnail.jpg?width=120&amp;height=120&amp;fit=bounds" /><br> Aula ReA - Hamblin
Traditional fallacies hamblin from Giovanni Damele
]]> 39 1 https://cdn.slidesharecdn.com/ss_thumbnails/traditionalfallacieshamblin-190514082034-thumbnail.jpg?width=120&height=120&fit=bounds presentation Black http://activitystrea.ms/schema/1.0/post http://activitystrea.ms/schema/1.0/posted 0 Flul 2 5_19 /slideshow/flul-2-519/145462902 flul2519-190514081935
Universidade de Lisboa - Confer¨ºncia ]]>
Universidade de Lisboa - Confer¨ºncia ]]> Tue, 14 May 2019 08:19:35 GMT /slideshow/flul-2-519/145462902 GiovanniDamele@slideshare.net(GiovanniDamele) Flul 2 5_19 GiovanniDamele Universidade de Lisboa - Confer¨ºncia <img style="border:1px solid #C3E6D8;float:right;" alt="" src="https://cdn.slidesharecdn.com/ss_thumbnails/flul2519-190514081935-thumbnail.jpg?width=120&amp;height=120&amp;fit=bounds" /><br> Universidade de Lisboa - Confer¨ºncia
Flul 2 5_19 from Giovanni Damele
]]> 43 2 https://cdn.slidesharecdn.com/ss_thumbnails/flul2519-190514081935-thumbnail.jpg?width=120&height=120&fit=bounds presentation Black http://activitystrea.ms/schema/1.0/post http://activitystrea.ms/schema/1.0/posted 0 Ep lab2019 /slideshow/ep-lab2019/145462684 eplab2019-190514081826
EPLab seminar - Alessandro Pizzorno]]>
EPLab seminar - Alessandro Pizzorno]]> Tue, 14 May 2019 08:18:26 GMT /slideshow/ep-lab2019/145462684 GiovanniDamele@slideshare.net(GiovanniDamele) Ep lab2019 GiovanniDamele EPLab seminar - Alessandro Pizzorno <img style="border:1px solid #C3E6D8;float:right;" alt="" src="https://cdn.slidesharecdn.com/ss_thumbnails/eplab2019-190514081826-thumbnail.jpg?width=120&amp;height=120&amp;fit=bounds" /><br> EPLab seminar - Alessandro Pizzorno
Ep lab2019 from Giovanni Damele
]]> 40 2 https://cdn.slidesharecdn.com/ss_thumbnails/eplab2019-190514081826-thumbnail.jpg?width=120&height=120&fit=bounds presentation Black http://activitystrea.ms/schema/1.0/post http://activitystrea.ms/schema/1.0/posted 0 Braga2019 /slideshow/braga2019/145462280 braga2019-190514081608
Vilfredo Pareto as argumentation theorist]]>
Vilfredo Pareto as argumentation theorist]]> Tue, 14 May 2019 08:16:08 GMT /slideshow/braga2019/145462280 GiovanniDamele@slideshare.net(GiovanniDamele) Braga2019 GiovanniDamele Vilfredo Pareto as argumentation theorist <img style="border:1px solid #C3E6D8;float:right;" alt="" src="https://cdn.slidesharecdn.com/ss_thumbnails/braga2019-190514081608-thumbnail.jpg?width=120&amp;height=120&amp;fit=bounds" /><br> Vilfredo Pareto as argumentation theorist
Braga2019 from Giovanni Damele
]]> 48 1 https://cdn.slidesharecdn.com/ss_thumbnails/braga2019-190514081608-thumbnail.jpg?width=120&height=120&fit=bounds presentation Black http://activitystrea.ms/schema/1.0/post http://activitystrea.ms/schema/1.0/posted 0 ¡°Argumentative Hypocrisy and Constituent Debates¡± /slideshow/argumentative-hypocrisy-and-constituent-debates/71189354 braga2017-170119153426
II BRAGA COLLOQUIUM IN THE HISTORY OF MORAL AND POLITICAL PHILOSOPHY]]>
II BRAGA COLLOQUIUM IN THE HISTORY OF MORAL AND POLITICAL PHILOSOPHY]]> Thu, 19 Jan 2017 15:34:26 GMT /slideshow/argumentative-hypocrisy-and-constituent-debates/71189354 GiovanniDamele@slideshare.net(GiovanniDamele) ¡°Argumentative Hypocrisy and Constituent Debates¡± GiovanniDamele II BRAGA COLLOQUIUM IN THE HISTORY OF MORAL AND POLITICAL PHILOSOPHY <img style="border:1px solid #C3E6D8;float:right;" alt="" src="https://cdn.slidesharecdn.com/ss_thumbnails/braga2017-170119153426-thumbnail.jpg?width=120&amp;height=120&amp;fit=bounds" /><br> II BRAGA COLLOQUIUM IN THE HISTORY OF MORAL AND POLITICAL PHILOSOPHY
¡°Argumentative Hypocrisy and Constituent Debates¡± from Giovanni Damele
]]> 194 10 https://cdn.slidesharecdn.com/ss_thumbnails/braga2017-170119153426-thumbnail.jpg?width=120&height=120&fit=bounds presentation Black http://activitystrea.ms/schema/1.0/post http://activitystrea.ms/schema/1.0/posted 0 Ret¨®rica e Argumenta??o - 2016 - Aula 1 https://pt.slideshare.net/slideshow/retrica-e-argumentao-2016-aula-1/58330104 rea20161-160216154834
Disciplina de Ret¨®rica e Argumenta??o (Licenciatura) - Turma A - Ano letivo 2015/16 - Aula n? 1 (16 de fevereiro)]]>
Disciplina de Ret¨®rica e Argumenta??o (Licenciatura) - Turma A - Ano letivo 2015/16 - Aula n? 1 (16 de fevereiro)]]> Tue, 16 Feb 2016 15:48:34 GMT https://pt.slideshare.net/slideshow/retrica-e-argumentao-2016-aula-1/58330104 GiovanniDamele@slideshare.net(GiovanniDamele) Ret¨®rica e Argumenta??o - 2016 - Aula 1 GiovanniDamele Disciplina de Ret¨®rica e Argumenta??o (Licenciatura) - Turma A - Ano letivo 2015/16 - Aula n? 1 (16 de fevereiro) <img style="border:1px solid #C3E6D8;float:right;" alt="" src="https://cdn.slidesharecdn.com/ss_thumbnails/rea20161-160216154834-thumbnail.jpg?width=120&amp;height=120&amp;fit=bounds" /><br> Disciplina de Ret¨®rica e Argumenta??o (Licenciatura) - Turma A - Ano letivo 2015/16 - Aula n? 1 (16 de fevereiro)
from Giovanni Damele
]]> 980 18 https://cdn.slidesharecdn.com/ss_thumbnails/rea20161-160216154834-thumbnail.jpg?width=120&height=120&fit=bounds presentation Black http://activitystrea.ms/schema/1.0/post http://activitystrea.ms/schema/1.0/posted 0 The Bearable Ambiguity of the Constitutional Text ¨C Arguing, Bargaining and Persuading in the Italian Constituent Assembly /slideshow/eca-49924230/49924230 eca-150628111027-lva1-app6892
John Elster suggested that the constitution-making enterprise can be understood resorting to two types of ¡°speech acts¡±: ¡°arguing¡± and ¡°bargaining¡±. He also makes reference to ¡°rhetorical statements¡±. Thus, the model seems to be triadic: arguing, bargaining, and persuading. The analysis of constitution-making debates could be improved by developing this triadic model. In order to test this model, I will analyse the debate that led to the promulgation of article 29 of the Italian constitution.]]>
John Elster suggested that the constitution-making enterprise can be understood resorting to two types of ¡°speech acts¡±: ¡°arguing¡± and ¡°bargaining¡±. He also makes reference to ¡°rhetorical statements¡±. Thus, the model seems to be triadic: arguing, bargaining, and persuading. The analysis of constitution-making debates could be improved by developing this triadic model. In order to test this model, I will analyse the debate that led to the promulgation of article 29 of the Italian constitution.]]> Sun, 28 Jun 2015 11:10:27 GMT /slideshow/eca-49924230/49924230 GiovanniDamele@slideshare.net(GiovanniDamele) The Bearable Ambiguity of the Constitutional Text ¨C Arguing, Bargaining and Persuading in the Italian Constituent Assembly GiovanniDamele John Elster suggested that the constitution-making enterprise can be understood resorting to two types of ¡°speech acts¡±: ¡°arguing¡± and ¡°bargaining¡±. He also makes reference to ¡°rhetorical statements¡±. Thus, the model seems to be triadic: arguing, bargaining, and persuading. The analysis of constitution-making debates could be improved by developing this triadic model. In order to test this model, I will analyse the debate that led to the promulgation of article 29 of the Italian constitution. <img style="border:1px solid #C3E6D8;float:right;" alt="" src="https://cdn.slidesharecdn.com/ss_thumbnails/eca-150628111027-lva1-app6892-thumbnail.jpg?width=120&amp;height=120&amp;fit=bounds" /><br> John Elster suggested that the constitution-making enterprise can be understood resorting to two types of ¡°speech acts¡±: ¡°arguing¡± and ¡°bargaining¡±. He also makes reference to ¡°rhetorical statements¡±. Thus, the model seems to be triadic: arguing, bargaining, and persuading. The analysis of constitution-making debates could be improved by developing this triadic model. In order to test this model, I will analyse the debate that led to the promulgation of article 29 of the Italian constitution.
The Bearable Ambiguity of the Constitutional Text ¨C Arguing, Bargaining and Persuading in the Italian Constituent Assembly from Giovanni Damele
]]> 330 5 https://cdn.slidesharecdn.com/ss_thumbnails/eca-150628111027-lva1-app6892-thumbnail.jpg?width=120&height=120&fit=bounds presentation Black http://activitystrea.ms/schema/1.0/post http://activitystrea.ms/schema/1.0/posted 0 Argumentation, negotiation and persuasion in constitution-making processes /slideshow/arg-lab-080414/33712181 arglab080414-140419110353-phpapp02
In his article Arguing and bargaining in two constituent assemblies, John Elster suggested that the constitution-making enterprise can be understood more generally resorting to two types of speech acts: ¡°arguing¡± and ¡°bargaining¡±. The two models are used by Elster with the aim of exploring on the one hand, ¡°the role of the rational argument¡±, on the other hand that of ¡°threatbased bargaining¡±. More specifically, Elster insists on the role of rational argument in constituent decision-making and claims that even the actors with ¡°purely self-interested¡± concerns may be ¡°forced or induced to substitute the language of impartial argument for the language of self-interest¡±. A kind of ¡°substitution¡± that Elster attributes to what he calls ¡°the civilizing force of hypocrisy¡±. However, Elster makes also reference (without further explanations) to a ¡°third type of speech acts¡±, namely ¡°rhetorical statement aiming at persuasion¡±, defining it as an ¡°appeal to the passions of [the] audience, rather to their reason or self-interest¡±. For this reason, Elster's model seems to be triadic: arguing (¡°reason speaks to reason¡±), bargaining (¡°interest to interest¡±) and persuading (¡°passion to passion¡±). In order to analyze real constitution-making processes, it may be interesting to test and, if necessary, developing this triadic model, perhaps combining it with other concepts developed in legal theory, such as the idea of ¡°incompletely theorized agreement¡± proposed by Cass Sunstein as a peculiar method of statute-making, aiming at reduce the potential for conflict. A method particularly used in order to draft statutory definitions.]]>
In his article Arguing and bargaining in two constituent assemblies, John Elster suggested that the constitution-making enterprise can be understood more generally resorting to two types of speech acts: ¡°arguing¡± and ¡°bargaining¡±. The two models are used by Elster with the aim of exploring on the one hand, ¡°the role of the rational argument¡±, on the other hand that of ¡°threatbased bargaining¡±. More specifically, Elster insists on the role of rational argument in constituent decision-making and claims that even the actors with ¡°purely self-interested¡± concerns may be ¡°forced or induced to substitute the language of impartial argument for the language of self-interest¡±. A kind of ¡°substitution¡± that Elster attributes to what he calls ¡°the civilizing force of hypocrisy¡±. However, Elster makes also reference (without further explanations) to a ¡°third type of speech acts¡±, namely ¡°rhetorical statement aiming at persuasion¡±, defining it as an ¡°appeal to the passions of [the] audience, rather to their reason or self-interest¡±. For this reason, Elster's model seems to be triadic: arguing (¡°reason speaks to reason¡±), bargaining (¡°interest to interest¡±) and persuading (¡°passion to passion¡±). In order to analyze real constitution-making processes, it may be interesting to test and, if necessary, developing this triadic model, perhaps combining it with other concepts developed in legal theory, such as the idea of ¡°incompletely theorized agreement¡± proposed by Cass Sunstein as a peculiar method of statute-making, aiming at reduce the potential for conflict. A method particularly used in order to draft statutory definitions.]]> Sat, 19 Apr 2014 11:03:53 GMT /slideshow/arg-lab-080414/33712181 GiovanniDamele@slideshare.net(GiovanniDamele) Argumentation, negotiation and persuasion in constitution-making processes GiovanniDamele In his article Arguing and bargaining in two constituent assemblies, John Elster suggested that the constitution-making enterprise can be understood more generally resorting to two types of speech acts: ¡°arguing¡± and ¡°bargaining¡±. The two models are used by Elster with the aim of exploring on the one hand, ¡°the role of the rational argument¡±, on the other hand that of ¡°threatbased bargaining¡±. More specifically, Elster insists on the role of rational argument in constituent decision-making and claims that even the actors with ¡°purely self-interested¡± concerns may be ¡°forced or induced to substitute the language of impartial argument for the language of self-interest¡±. A kind of ¡°substitution¡± that Elster attributes to what he calls ¡°the civilizing force of hypocrisy¡±. However, Elster makes also reference (without further explanations) to a ¡°third type of speech acts¡±, namely ¡°rhetorical statement aiming at persuasion¡±, defining it as an ¡°appeal to the passions of [the] audience, rather to their reason or self-interest¡±. For this reason, Elster's model seems to be triadic: arguing (¡°reason speaks to reason¡±), bargaining (¡°interest to interest¡±) and persuading (¡°passion to passion¡±). In order to analyze real constitution-making processes, it may be interesting to test and, if necessary, developing this triadic model, perhaps combining it with other concepts developed in legal theory, such as the idea of ¡°incompletely theorized agreement¡± proposed by Cass Sunstein as a peculiar method of statute-making, aiming at reduce the potential for conflict. A method particularly used in order to draft statutory definitions. <img style="border:1px solid #C3E6D8;float:right;" alt="" src="https://cdn.slidesharecdn.com/ss_thumbnails/arglab080414-140419110353-phpapp02-thumbnail.jpg?width=120&amp;height=120&amp;fit=bounds" /><br> In his article Arguing and bargaining in two constituent assemblies, John Elster suggested that the constitution-making enterprise can be understood more generally resorting to two types of speech acts: ¡°arguing¡± and ¡°bargaining¡±. The two models are used by Elster with the aim of exploring on the one hand, ¡°the role of the rational argument¡±, on the other hand that of ¡°threatbased bargaining¡±. More specifically, Elster insists on the role of rational argument in constituent decision-making and claims that even the actors with ¡°purely self-interested¡± concerns may be ¡°forced or induced to substitute the language of impartial argument for the language of self-interest¡±. A kind of ¡°substitution¡± that Elster attributes to what he calls ¡°the civilizing force of hypocrisy¡±. However, Elster makes also reference (without further explanations) to a ¡°third type of speech acts¡±, namely ¡°rhetorical statement aiming at persuasion¡±, defining it as an ¡°appeal to the passions of [the] audience, rather to their reason or self-interest¡±. For this reason, Elster&#39;s model seems to be triadic: arguing (¡°reason speaks to reason¡±), bargaining (¡°interest to interest¡±) and persuading (¡°passion to passion¡±). In order to analyze real constitution-making processes, it may be interesting to test and, if necessary, developing this triadic model, perhaps combining it with other concepts developed in legal theory, such as the idea of ¡°incompletely theorized agreement¡± proposed by Cass Sunstein as a peculiar method of statute-making, aiming at reduce the potential for conflict. A method particularly used in order to draft statutory definitions.
Argumentation, negotiation and persuasion in constitution-making processes from Giovanni Damele
]]> 560 6 https://cdn.slidesharecdn.com/ss_thumbnails/arglab080414-140419110353-phpapp02-thumbnail.jpg?width=120&height=120&fit=bounds presentation White http://activitystrea.ms/schema/1.0/post http://activitystrea.ms/schema/1.0/posted 0 Giustizia, politica e opinione pubblica: il caso italiano e il caso brasiliano a confronto /slideshow/lugano-28-0114/30494357 lugano280114-140127104721-phpapp01
]]>
]]> Mon, 27 Jan 2014 10:47:21 GMT /slideshow/lugano-28-0114/30494357 GiovanniDamele@slideshare.net(GiovanniDamele) Giustizia, politica e opinione pubblica: il caso italiano e il caso brasiliano a confronto GiovanniDamele <img style="border:1px solid #C3E6D8;float:right;" alt="" src="https://cdn.slidesharecdn.com/ss_thumbnails/lugano280114-140127104721-phpapp01-thumbnail.jpg?width=120&amp;height=120&amp;fit=bounds" /><br>
Giustizia, politica e opinione pubblica: il caso italiano e il caso brasiliano a confronto from Giovanni Damele
]]> 330 38 https://cdn.slidesharecdn.com/ss_thumbnails/lugano280114-140127104721-phpapp01-thumbnail.jpg?width=120&height=120&fit=bounds presentation White http://activitystrea.ms/schema/1.0/post http://activitystrea.ms/schema/1.0/posted 0 An¨¢lise argumentativa da jurisprud¨ºncia do Tribunal Constitucional https://pt.slideshare.net/slideshow/coimbra12-3-13/18013454 coimbra12313-130401171722-phpapp01
]]>
]]> Mon, 01 Apr 2013 17:17:22 GMT https://pt.slideshare.net/slideshow/coimbra12-3-13/18013454 GiovanniDamele@slideshare.net(GiovanniDamele) An¨¢lise argumentativa da jurisprud¨ºncia do Tribunal Constitucional GiovanniDamele <img style="border:1px solid #C3E6D8;float:right;" alt="" src="https://cdn.slidesharecdn.com/ss_thumbnails/coimbra12313-130401171722-phpapp01-thumbnail.jpg?width=120&amp;height=120&amp;fit=bounds" /><br>
from Giovanni Damele
]]> 929 4 https://cdn.slidesharecdn.com/ss_thumbnails/coimbra12313-130401171722-phpapp01-thumbnail.jpg?width=120&height=120&fit=bounds presentation White http://activitystrea.ms/schema/1.0/post http://activitystrea.ms/schema/1.0/posted 0 Adj 6 3 https://pt.slideshare.net/slideshow/adj-6-3/13249756 adj63-120608091347-phpapp01
]]>
]]> Fri, 08 Jun 2012 09:13:44 GMT https://pt.slideshare.net/slideshow/adj-6-3/13249756 GiovanniDamele@slideshare.net(GiovanniDamele) Adj 6 3 GiovanniDamele <img style="border:1px solid #C3E6D8;float:right;" alt="" src="https://cdn.slidesharecdn.com/ss_thumbnails/adj63-120608091347-phpapp01-thumbnail.jpg?width=120&amp;height=120&amp;fit=bounds" /><br>
from Giovanni Damele
]]> 419 3 https://cdn.slidesharecdn.com/ss_thumbnails/adj63-120608091347-phpapp01-thumbnail.jpg?width=120&height=120&fit=bounds presentation Black http://activitystrea.ms/schema/1.0/post http://activitystrea.ms/schema/1.0/posted 0 https://cdn.slidesharecdn.com/profile-photo-GiovanniDamele-48x48.jpg?cb=1557821274 Professor auxiliar convidado (invited assistent professor) - Faculdade de Ci¨ºncias Sociais e Humanas, Universidade Nova de Lisboa https://fcsh-unl.academia.edu/GiovanniDamele https://cdn.slidesharecdn.com/ss_thumbnails/retoricamediatizada2019-190514082125-thumbnail.jpg?width=320&height=320&fit=bounds slideshow/retorica-mediatizada2019/145463244 Retorica mediatizada2019 https://cdn.slidesharecdn.com/ss_thumbnails/traditionalfallacieshamblin-190514082034-thumbnail.jpg?width=320&height=320&fit=bounds slideshow/traditional-fallacies-hamblin/145463096 Traditional fallacies ... https://cdn.slidesharecdn.com/ss_thumbnails/flul2519-190514081935-thumbnail.jpg?width=320&height=320&fit=bounds slideshow/flul-2-519/145462902 Flul 2 5_19