�ݺ�ߣshows by User: rshimoda2014

�ݺ�ߣshows by User: rshimoda2014 / http://www.slideshare.net/images/logo.gif �ݺ�ߣshows by User: rshimoda2014 / Wed, 18 Apr 2018 02:46:03 GMT �ݺ�ߣShare feed for �ݺ�ߣshows by User: rshimoda2014 Prepare to launch! Update April 2018 /slideshow/prepare-to-launch-update-april-2018/94164588 preparetolaunchupdateapril2018jh-180418024603
Prepare to Launch! Guidelines for Accessing, Designing, and Building Launch Sites for Carry-in Watercraft. Updated April 2018. A Guide to help facility and water trail planners and park and recreation project leaders plan, build or update an access site tailored to the needs of canoeists, kayakers, tubers, stand-up paddlers, or small craft sailors. It guides a reader through the development process from conception to design creation, and provides a variety of launch construction options.]]>
Prepare to Launch! Guidelines for Accessing, Designing, and Building Launch Sites for Carry-in Watercraft. Updated April 2018. A Guide to help facility and water trail planners and park and recreation project leaders plan, build or update an access site tailored to the needs of canoeists, kayakers, tubers, stand-up paddlers, or small craft sailors. It guides a reader through the development process from conception to design creation, and provides a variety of launch construction options.]]> Wed, 18 Apr 2018 02:46:03 GMT /slideshow/prepare-to-launch-update-april-2018/94164588 rshimoda2014@slideshare.net(rshimoda2014) Prepare to launch! Update April 2018 rshimoda2014 Prepare to Launch! Guidelines for Accessing, Designing, and Building Launch Sites for Carry-in Watercraft. Updated April 2018. A Guide to help facility and water trail planners and park and recreation project leaders plan, build or update an access site tailored to the needs of canoeists, kayakers, tubers, stand-up paddlers, or small craft sailors. It guides a reader through the development process from conception to design creation, and provides a variety of launch construction options. <img style="border:1px solid #C3E6D8;float:right;" alt="" src="https://cdn.slidesharecdn.com/ss_thumbnails/preparetolaunchupdateapril2018jh-180418024603-thumbnail.jpg?width=120&height=120&fit=bounds" /> Prepare to Launch! Guidelines for Accessing, Designing, and Building Launch Sites for Carry-in Watercraft. Updated April 2018. A Guide to help facility and water trail planners and park and recreation project leaders plan, build or update an access site tailored to the needs of canoeists, kayakers, tubers, stand-up paddlers, or small craft sailors. It guides a reader through the development process from conception to design creation, and provides a variety of launch construction options.

Prepare to launch! Update April 2018 from rshimoda2014

]]> 890 8 https://cdn.slidesharecdn.com/ss_thumbnails/preparetolaunchupdateapril2018jh-180418024603-thumbnail.jpg?width=120&height=120&fit=bounds presentation Black http://activitystrea.ms/schema/1.0/post

http://activitystrea.ms/schema/1.0/posted

0 Mayor Karl Dean, City of Nashville, Tennessee - Images from the 2010 Flood /slideshow/140417-river-management-conference-ppt-presentation/36161192 140417rivermanagementconferencepptpresentation-140622084857-phpapp02
A devastating flood hit Nashville in early May 2010, drenching the city but uniting our community. Today, recovery efforts continue. Hundreds of citizens are rebuilding their homes and their lives, and the Metro Government is improving emergency preparedness and planning for Nashville’s long-term recovery. Mayor Dean recounted the long hours of the weekend, whose national news profile was low. His inspiring story of emergency, recovery and rebuilding applauded the City's rapid assessment, prioritization and action; the committed staff who worked around the clock; and the community's embrace of recovery and restoration. http://www.nashville.gov/Government/History-of-Metro/Nashville-Flood-May-2010.aspx]]>
A devastating flood hit Nashville in early May 2010, drenching the city but uniting our community. Today, recovery efforts continue. Hundreds of citizens are rebuilding their homes and their lives, and the Metro Government is improving emergency preparedness and planning for Nashville’s long-term recovery. Mayor Dean recounted the long hours of the weekend, whose national news profile was low. His inspiring story of emergency, recovery and rebuilding applauded the City's rapid assessment, prioritization and action; the committed staff who worked around the clock; and the community's embrace of recovery and restoration. http://www.nashville.gov/Government/History-of-Metro/Nashville-Flood-May-2010.aspx]]> Sun, 22 Jun 2014 08:48:57 GMT /slideshow/140417-river-management-conference-ppt-presentation/36161192 rshimoda2014@slideshare.net(rshimoda2014) Mayor Karl Dean, City of Nashville, Tennessee - Images from the 2010 Flood rshimoda2014 A devastating flood hit Nashville in early May 2010, drenching the city but uniting our community. Today, recovery efforts continue. Hundreds of citizens are rebuilding their homes and their lives, and the Metro Government is improving emergency preparedness and planning for Nashville’s long-term recovery. Mayor Dean recounted the long hours of the weekend, whose national news profile was low. His inspiring story of emergency, recovery and rebuilding applauded the City's rapid assessment, prioritization and action; the committed staff who worked around the clock; and the community's embrace of recovery and restoration. http://www.nashville.gov/Government/History-of-Metro/Nashville-Flood-May-2010.aspx <img style="border:1px solid #C3E6D8;float:right;" alt="" src="https://cdn.slidesharecdn.com/ss_thumbnails/140417rivermanagementconferencepptpresentation-140622084857-phpapp02-thumbnail.jpg?width=120&height=120&fit=bounds" /> A devastating flood hit Nashville in early May 2010, drenching the city but uniting our community. Today, recovery efforts continue. Hundreds of citizens are rebuilding their homes and their lives, and the Metro Government is improving emergency preparedness and planning for Nashville’s long-term recovery. Mayor Dean recounted the long hours of the weekend, whose national news profile was low. His inspiring story of emergency, recovery and rebuilding applauded the City's rapid assessment, prioritization and action; the committed staff who worked around the clock; and the community's embrace of recovery and restoration. http://www.nashville.gov/Government/History-of-Metro/Nashville-Flood-May-2010.aspx

Mayor Karl Dean, City of Nashville, Tennessee - Images from the 2010 Flood from rshimoda2014

]]> 1654 8 https://cdn.slidesharecdn.com/ss_thumbnails/140417rivermanagementconferencepptpresentation-140622084857-phpapp02-thumbnail.jpg?width=120&height=120&fit=bounds presentation Black http://activitystrea.ms/schema/1.0/post

http://activitystrea.ms/schema/1.0/posted

0 Environmental stewards program and River Restoration Program - Michael Rendon and Mike Wight, Southwest Conservation Corps /slideshow/rendon-michael-environmental-stewards-program-presentation/36148386 rendonmichael-environmentalstewardsprogrampresentation-140621174436-phpapp02
The health of American rivers is essential to the communities and environments that depend on the beneficial ecosystem services provided. Historic impacts from mining, dams, and a variety of land use practices have left many river environments and riverside communities with a legacy of polluted waterways, erosion, and habitat degradation. With an increasing need to address river health it is essential to engage young adults in this work to conserve and preserve these resources for the future. Through emerging opportunities, young adults can learn skills, gain understanding, and physically work to restore and protect river systems. Programs- like those of the Southwest Conservation Corps- are working with partners to engage this population in various ways, providing much needed job training and education through stewardship. Michael Rendon will present on Southwest Conservation Corp’s Environmental Stewards program, highlighting past successes and engagement models for DOI Bureaus and non-profits interested in obtaining a Steward. Showcased will be Inyo County’s work on the Lower Owens River Project, along with a Sturgeon habitat restoration project with the USGS Great Lakes Science Center that was nominated for the 2013 Secretary of the Interior Partners in Conservation Award. Mike Wight will discuss collaborative work with corps programs and partnerships furthering multi-year, watershed-length habitat restoration initiatives on major tributaries in the Colorado River Basin. Word crews and interns provide much of the hands-on restoration implementation within these initiatives after completing comprehensive training. In all three of these programs, participants foster a respect for river systems while gaining valuable work experience and building resumes for future conservation careers. The Southwest Conservation Corps empowers individuals to positively impact their lives, their communities, and the environment. ]]>
The health of American rivers is essential to the communities and environments that depend on the beneficial ecosystem services provided. Historic impacts from mining, dams, and a variety of land use practices have left many river environments and riverside communities with a legacy of polluted waterways, erosion, and habitat degradation. With an increasing need to address river health it is essential to engage young adults in this work to conserve and preserve these resources for the future. Through emerging opportunities, young adults can learn skills, gain understanding, and physically work to restore and protect river systems. Programs- like those of the Southwest Conservation Corps- are working with partners to engage this population in various ways, providing much needed job training and education through stewardship. Michael Rendon will present on Southwest Conservation Corp’s Environmental Stewards program, highlighting past successes and engagement models for DOI Bureaus and non-profits interested in obtaining a Steward. Showcased will be Inyo County’s work on the Lower Owens River Project, along with a Sturgeon habitat restoration project with the USGS Great Lakes Science Center that was nominated for the 2013 Secretary of the Interior Partners in Conservation Award. Mike Wight will discuss collaborative work with corps programs and partnerships furthering multi-year, watershed-length habitat restoration initiatives on major tributaries in the Colorado River Basin. Word crews and interns provide much of the hands-on restoration implementation within these initiatives after completing comprehensive training. In all three of these programs, participants foster a respect for river systems while gaining valuable work experience and building resumes for future conservation careers. The Southwest Conservation Corps empowers individuals to positively impact their lives, their communities, and the environment. ]]> Sat, 21 Jun 2014 17:44:36 GMT /slideshow/rendon-michael-environmental-stewards-program-presentation/36148386 rshimoda2014@slideshare.net(rshimoda2014) Environmental stewards program and River Restoration Program - Michael Rendon and Mike Wight, Southwest Conservation Corps rshimoda2014 The health of American rivers is essential to the communities and environments that depend on the beneficial ecosystem services provided. Historic impacts from mining, dams, and a variety of land use practices have left many river environments and riverside communities with a legacy of polluted waterways, erosion, and habitat degradation. With an increasing need to address river health it is essential to engage young adults in this work to conserve and preserve these resources for the future. Through emerging opportunities, young adults can learn skills, gain understanding, and physically work to restore and protect river systems. Programs- like those of the Southwest Conservation Corps- are working with partners to engage this population in various ways, providing much needed job training and education through stewardship. Michael Rendon will present on Southwest Conservation Corp’s Environmental Stewards program, highlighting past successes and engagement models for DOI Bureaus and non-profits interested in obtaining a Steward. Showcased will be Inyo County’s work on the Lower Owens River Project, along with a Sturgeon habitat restoration project with the USGS Great Lakes Science Center that was nominated for the 2013 Secretary of the Interior Partners in Conservation Award. Mike Wight will discuss collaborative work with corps programs and partnerships furthering multi-year, watershed-length habitat restoration initiatives on major tributaries in the Colorado River Basin. Word crews and interns provide much of the hands-on restoration implementation within these initiatives after completing comprehensive training. In all three of these programs, participants foster a respect for river systems while gaining valuable work experience and building resumes for future conservation careers. The Southwest Conservation Corps empowers individuals to positively impact their lives, their communities, and the environment. <img style="border:1px solid #C3E6D8;float:right;" alt="" src="https://cdn.slidesharecdn.com/ss_thumbnails/rendonmichael-environmentalstewardsprogrampresentation-140621174436-phpapp02-thumbnail.jpg?width=120&height=120&fit=bounds" /> The health of American rivers is essential to the communities and environments that depend on the beneficial ecosystem services provided. Historic impacts from mining, dams, and a variety of land use practices have left many river environments and riverside communities with a legacy of polluted waterways, erosion, and habitat degradation. With an increasing need to address river health it is essential to engage young adults in this work to conserve and preserve these resources for the future. Through emerging opportunities, young adults can learn skills, gain understanding, and physically work to restore and protect river systems. Programs- like those of the Southwest Conservation Corps- are working with partners to engage this population in various ways, providing much needed job training and education through stewardship. Michael Rendon will present on Southwest Conservation Corp’s Environmental Stewards program, highlighting past successes and engagement models for DOI Bureaus and non-profits interested in obtaining a Steward. Showcased will be Inyo County’s work on the Lower Owens River Project, along with a Sturgeon habitat restoration project with the USGS Great Lakes Science Center that was nominated for the 2013 Secretary of the Interior Partners in Conservation Award. Mike Wight will discuss collaborative work with corps programs and partnerships furthering multi-year, watershed-length habitat restoration initiatives on major tributaries in the Colorado River Basin. Word crews and interns provide much of the hands-on restoration implementation within these initiatives after completing comprehensive training. In all three of these programs, participants foster a respect for river systems while gaining valuable work experience and building resumes for future conservation careers. The Southwest Conservation Corps empowers individuals to positively impact their lives, their communities, and the environment.

Environmental stewards program and River Restoration Program - Michael Rendon and Mike Wight, Southwest Conservation Corps from rshimoda2014

]]> 778 6 https://cdn.slidesharecdn.com/ss_thumbnails/rendonmichael-environmentalstewardsprogrampresentation-140621174436-phpapp02-thumbnail.jpg?width=120&height=120&fit=bounds presentation Black http://activitystrea.ms/schema/1.0/post

http://activitystrea.ms/schema/1.0/posted

0 Careers in natural resources initiative - Lisa Eadens, Colorado Alliance for Environmental Education /slideshow/eadens-lisa-careers-in-natural-resources-initiative/36148381 eadenslisa-careersinnaturalresourcesinitiative-140621174434-phpapp01
There is great concern over who will protect, maintain and enhance our natural resources in the future. Currently, outdoor play time for kids is minimal, especially for children living in urban areas, while kids’ average “screen time” exceeds 40 hours a week. By some accounts, as many as 50% of state and federal land managers are retirement-eligible within the next five years. However, because a generation or more of children has not had a close and ongoing relationship with the outdoors, state and federal natural resource agencies are having difficulty recruiting employees who have the necessary skills, experience, education, and emotional connection to the outdoors to take over the management of public lands. Simultaneously, agencies not only need skilled candidates, they need candidates that represent the changing demographics of the state. The Careers in Natural Resources Initiative aims to help youth make the leap from participation in an outdoor program to a sustainable career through three strategies that address different audiences along a spectrum from awareness to action. Support Career Exploration – Most youth lack understanding of career opportunities in natural resources. To promote these opportunities and foster interest in natural resource careers, partners participated in 8th grade career fairs throughout the region and are planning a Careers in Natural Resource Experience this spring. Develop Online Jobs Portal – Working with our partners, an online web portal that provides a single springboard to help organize and access needed information, job postings, and resources around natural resource careers was launched in the fall of 2013. Create Career Guide – Publication of a Guide to Natural Resources Career Paths aimed at entry-level candidates is underway. The Guide will provide step-by-step assistance for youth interested in natural resource careers regarding how to apply and navigate state and federal job listings and application processes. ]]>
There is great concern over who will protect, maintain and enhance our natural resources in the future. Currently, outdoor play time for kids is minimal, especially for children living in urban areas, while kids’ average “screen time” exceeds 40 hours a week. By some accounts, as many as 50% of state and federal land managers are retirement-eligible within the next five years. However, because a generation or more of children has not had a close and ongoing relationship with the outdoors, state and federal natural resource agencies are having difficulty recruiting employees who have the necessary skills, experience, education, and emotional connection to the outdoors to take over the management of public lands. Simultaneously, agencies not only need skilled candidates, they need candidates that represent the changing demographics of the state. The Careers in Natural Resources Initiative aims to help youth make the leap from participation in an outdoor program to a sustainable career through three strategies that address different audiences along a spectrum from awareness to action. Support Career Exploration – Most youth lack understanding of career opportunities in natural resources. To promote these opportunities and foster interest in natural resource careers, partners participated in 8th grade career fairs throughout the region and are planning a Careers in Natural Resource Experience this spring. Develop Online Jobs Portal – Working with our partners, an online web portal that provides a single springboard to help organize and access needed information, job postings, and resources around natural resource careers was launched in the fall of 2013. Create Career Guide – Publication of a Guide to Natural Resources Career Paths aimed at entry-level candidates is underway. The Guide will provide step-by-step assistance for youth interested in natural resource careers regarding how to apply and navigate state and federal job listings and application processes. ]]> Sat, 21 Jun 2014 17:44:34 GMT /slideshow/eadens-lisa-careers-in-natural-resources-initiative/36148381 rshimoda2014@slideshare.net(rshimoda2014) Careers in natural resources initiative - Lisa Eadens, Colorado Alliance for Environmental Education rshimoda2014 There is great concern over who will protect, maintain and enhance our natural resources in the future. Currently, outdoor play time for kids is minimal, especially for children living in urban areas, while kids’ average “screen time” exceeds 40 hours a week. By some accounts, as many as 50% of state and federal land managers are retirement-eligible within the next five years. However, because a generation or more of children has not had a close and ongoing relationship with the outdoors, state and federal natural resource agencies are having difficulty recruiting employees who have the necessary skills, experience, education, and emotional connection to the outdoors to take over the management of public lands. Simultaneously, agencies not only need skilled candidates, they need candidates that represent the changing demographics of the state. The Careers in Natural Resources Initiative aims to help youth make the leap from participation in an outdoor program to a sustainable career through three strategies that address different audiences along a spectrum from awareness to action. Support Career Exploration – Most youth lack understanding of career opportunities in natural resources. To promote these opportunities and foster interest in natural resource careers, partners participated in 8th grade career fairs throughout the region and are planning a Careers in Natural Resource Experience this spring. Develop Online Jobs Portal – Working with our partners, an online web portal that provides a single springboard to help organize and access needed information, job postings, and resources around natural resource careers was launched in the fall of 2013. Create Career Guide – Publication of a Guide to Natural Resources Career Paths aimed at entry-level candidates is underway. The Guide will provide step-by-step assistance for youth interested in natural resource careers regarding how to apply and navigate state and federal job listings and application processes. <img style="border:1px solid #C3E6D8;float:right;" alt="" src="https://cdn.slidesharecdn.com/ss_thumbnails/eadenslisa-careersinnaturalresourcesinitiative-140621174434-phpapp01-thumbnail.jpg?width=120&height=120&fit=bounds" /> There is great concern over who will protect, maintain and enhance our natural resources in the future. Currently, outdoor play time for kids is minimal, especially for children living in urban areas, while kids’ average “screen time” exceeds 40 hours a week. By some accounts, as many as 50% of state and federal land managers are retirement-eligible within the next five years. However, because a generation or more of children has not had a close and ongoing relationship with the outdoors, state and federal natural resource agencies are having difficulty recruiting employees who have the necessary skills, experience, education, and emotional connection to the outdoors to take over the management of public lands. Simultaneously, agencies not only need skilled candidates, they need candidates that represent the changing demographics of the state. The Careers in Natural Resources Initiative aims to help youth make the leap from participation in an outdoor program to a sustainable career through three strategies that address different audiences along a spectrum from awareness to action. Support Career Exploration – Most youth lack understanding of career opportunities in natural resources. To promote these opportunities and foster interest in natural resource careers, partners participated in 8th grade career fairs throughout the region and are planning a Careers in Natural Resource Experience this spring. Develop Online Jobs Portal – Working with our partners, an online web portal that provides a single springboard to help organize and access needed information, job postings, and resources around natural resource careers was launched in the fall of 2013. Create Career Guide – Publication of a Guide to Natural Resources Career Paths aimed at entry-level candidates is underway. The Guide will provide step-by-step assistance for youth interested in natural resource careers regarding how to apply and navigate state and federal job listings and application processes.

Careers in natural resources initiative - Lisa Eadens, Colorado Alliance for Environmental Education from rshimoda2014

]]> 698 9 https://cdn.slidesharecdn.com/ss_thumbnails/eadenslisa-careersinnaturalresourcesinitiative-140621174434-phpapp01-thumbnail.jpg?width=120&height=120&fit=bounds presentation Black http://activitystrea.ms/schema/1.0/post

http://activitystrea.ms/schema/1.0/posted

0 Chainsaw safety in and on water - Erik Wrede, Minnesota Department of Natural Resources /slideshow/chainsaw-safety-in-on-water/36148380 chainsawsafetyinonwater-140621174433-phpapp01
River managers frequently need to make decisions with a balance of public safe passage and habitat protection in mind. Woody obstructions are critical to the health of aquatic ecosystems, and they can also present a public safety hazard. If the decision is made to remove woody obstructions, chainsaw work in/on water presents some very complex safety considerations. Compression, tension, buoyancy, gravity, current, and lack of visibility beneath the water are some of the factors that can affect a crew’s decisions about if and how to remove woody obstructions. This session will give you a brief introduction to comprehensive safety training on how to use chainsaws while wading in a river, and while cutting from a jon boat. The full training includes a narrated PowerPoint with photos of various scenarios, and 5 quizzes. This is typically followed by two days of field training, guided by lesson plans and field evaluation forms. By understanding the anatomy of woody obstructions, river managers and crews will improve their risk analysis and planning skills. The Minnesota State Water Trails system started in 1963 and includes 32 rivers and the North Shore of Lake Superior. The Minnesota DNR manages over 4,500 miles of routes for canoeing, kayaking, boating and camping.]]>
River managers frequently need to make decisions with a balance of public safe passage and habitat protection in mind. Woody obstructions are critical to the health of aquatic ecosystems, and they can also present a public safety hazard. If the decision is made to remove woody obstructions, chainsaw work in/on water presents some very complex safety considerations. Compression, tension, buoyancy, gravity, current, and lack of visibility beneath the water are some of the factors that can affect a crew’s decisions about if and how to remove woody obstructions. This session will give you a brief introduction to comprehensive safety training on how to use chainsaws while wading in a river, and while cutting from a jon boat. The full training includes a narrated PowerPoint with photos of various scenarios, and 5 quizzes. This is typically followed by two days of field training, guided by lesson plans and field evaluation forms. By understanding the anatomy of woody obstructions, river managers and crews will improve their risk analysis and planning skills. The Minnesota State Water Trails system started in 1963 and includes 32 rivers and the North Shore of Lake Superior. The Minnesota DNR manages over 4,500 miles of routes for canoeing, kayaking, boating and camping.]]> Sat, 21 Jun 2014 17:44:33 GMT /slideshow/chainsaw-safety-in-on-water/36148380 rshimoda2014@slideshare.net(rshimoda2014) Chainsaw safety in and on water - Erik Wrede, Minnesota Department of Natural Resources rshimoda2014 River managers frequently need to make decisions with a balance of public safe passage and habitat protection in mind. Woody obstructions are critical to the health of aquatic ecosystems, and they can also present a public safety hazard. If the decision is made to remove woody obstructions, chainsaw work in/on water presents some very complex safety considerations. Compression, tension, buoyancy, gravity, current, and lack of visibility beneath the water are some of the factors that can affect a crew’s decisions about if and how to remove woody obstructions. This session will give you a brief introduction to comprehensive safety training on how to use chainsaws while wading in a river, and while cutting from a jon boat. The full training includes a narrated PowerPoint with photos of various scenarios, and 5 quizzes. This is typically followed by two days of field training, guided by lesson plans and field evaluation forms. By understanding the anatomy of woody obstructions, river managers and crews will improve their risk analysis and planning skills. The Minnesota State Water Trails system started in 1963 and includes 32 rivers and the North Shore of Lake Superior. The Minnesota DNR manages over 4,500 miles of routes for canoeing, kayaking, boating and camping. <img style="border:1px solid #C3E6D8;float:right;" alt="" src="https://cdn.slidesharecdn.com/ss_thumbnails/chainsawsafetyinonwater-140621174433-phpapp01-thumbnail.jpg?width=120&height=120&fit=bounds" /> River managers frequently need to make decisions with a balance of public safe passage and habitat protection in mind. Woody obstructions are critical to the health of aquatic ecosystems, and they can also present a public safety hazard. If the decision is made to remove woody obstructions, chainsaw work in/on water presents some very complex safety considerations. Compression, tension, buoyancy, gravity, current, and lack of visibility beneath the water are some of the factors that can affect a crew’s decisions about if and how to remove woody obstructions. This session will give you a brief introduction to comprehensive safety training on how to use chainsaws while wading in a river, and while cutting from a jon boat. The full training includes a narrated PowerPoint with photos of various scenarios, and 5 quizzes. This is typically followed by two days of field training, guided by lesson plans and field evaluation forms. By understanding the anatomy of woody obstructions, river managers and crews will improve their risk analysis and planning skills. The Minnesota State Water Trails system started in 1963 and includes 32 rivers and the North Shore of Lake Superior. The Minnesota DNR manages over 4,500 miles of routes for canoeing, kayaking, boating and camping.

Chainsaw safety in and on water - Erik Wrede, Minnesota Department of Natural Resources from rshimoda2014

]]> 2853 10 https://cdn.slidesharecdn.com/ss_thumbnails/chainsawsafetyinonwater-140621174433-phpapp01-thumbnail.jpg?width=120&height=120&fit=bounds presentation Black http://activitystrea.ms/schema/1.0/post

http://activitystrea.ms/schema/1.0/posted

0 Dedicated funding for rivers - Peter Hark, Rob White /slideshow/dedicated-funding-for-rivers-peter-hark-rob-white/36147892 dedicatedfundingforrivers-mnandco-140621170854-phpapp01
Peter Hark - Minnesota Department of Natural Resources, Rob White - Arkansas Headwaters Recreation Area, Colorado Parks and Wildlife This workshop will explore dedicated funding models used to fund river recreation activities. Watercraft license fees are used by the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources to develop and manage over 3,700 public water accesses, campsites, rest areas and portages. In Colorado, the Arkansas Headwaters Recreation Area (AHRA) receives the majority of its funding from a portion of commercial outfitters total gross receipts from sales of authorized activities. The AHRA also receives funding through park pass and camping fees. In addition, Colorado Parks and Wildlife also funds it's statewide river ranger program through the River Outfitter Licensing program. ]]>
Peter Hark - Minnesota Department of Natural Resources, Rob White - Arkansas Headwaters Recreation Area, Colorado Parks and Wildlife This workshop will explore dedicated funding models used to fund river recreation activities. Watercraft license fees are used by the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources to develop and manage over 3,700 public water accesses, campsites, rest areas and portages. In Colorado, the Arkansas Headwaters Recreation Area (AHRA) receives the majority of its funding from a portion of commercial outfitters total gross receipts from sales of authorized activities. The AHRA also receives funding through park pass and camping fees. In addition, Colorado Parks and Wildlife also funds it's statewide river ranger program through the River Outfitter Licensing program. ]]> Sat, 21 Jun 2014 17:08:54 GMT /slideshow/dedicated-funding-for-rivers-peter-hark-rob-white/36147892 rshimoda2014@slideshare.net(rshimoda2014) Dedicated funding for rivers - Peter Hark, Rob White rshimoda2014 Peter Hark - Minnesota Department of Natural Resources, Rob White - Arkansas Headwaters Recreation Area, Colorado Parks and Wildlife This workshop will explore dedicated funding models used to fund river recreation activities. Watercraft license fees are used by the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources to develop and manage over 3,700 public water accesses, campsites, rest areas and portages. In Colorado, the Arkansas Headwaters Recreation Area (AHRA) receives the majority of its funding from a portion of commercial outfitters total gross receipts from sales of authorized activities. The AHRA also receives funding through park pass and camping fees. In addition, Colorado Parks and Wildlife also funds it's statewide river ranger program through the River Outfitter Licensing program. <img style="border:1px solid #C3E6D8;float:right;" alt="" src="https://cdn.slidesharecdn.com/ss_thumbnails/dedicatedfundingforrivers-mnandco-140621170854-phpapp01-thumbnail.jpg?width=120&height=120&fit=bounds" /> Peter Hark - Minnesota Department of Natural Resources, Rob White - Arkansas Headwaters Recreation Area, Colorado Parks and Wildlife This workshop will explore dedicated funding models used to fund river recreation activities. Watercraft license fees are used by the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources to develop and manage over 3,700 public water accesses, campsites, rest areas and portages. In Colorado, the Arkansas Headwaters Recreation Area (AHRA) receives the majority of its funding from a portion of commercial outfitters total gross receipts from sales of authorized activities. The AHRA also receives funding through park pass and camping fees. In addition, Colorado Parks and Wildlife also funds it's statewide river ranger program through the River Outfitter Licensing program.

Dedicated funding for rivers - Peter Hark, Rob White from rshimoda2014

]]> 527 5 https://cdn.slidesharecdn.com/ss_thumbnails/dedicatedfundingforrivers-mnandco-140621170854-phpapp01-thumbnail.jpg?width=120&height=120&fit=bounds presentation Black http://activitystrea.ms/schema/1.0/post

http://activitystrea.ms/schema/1.0/posted

0 Colorado water conservation board and great outdoors colorado funding sources for rivers - Chris Sturm, CWCB and Josh Tenneson, GOCO /slideshow/colorado-water-conservation-board-and-great-outdoors-colorado-funding-sources-for-rivers-chris-sturm-josh-tenneson/36147891 coloradowaterconservationboardandgreatoutdoorscoloradofundingsourcesforrivers-chrissturmjoshtenneson-140621170852-phpapp01
These are two presentations from a panel moderated by Amy Beattie, Colorado Water Trust. Panelists included Josh Tenneson, Great Outdoors Colorado; Chris Sturm, Colorado Water Conservation Board; Caroline Bradford, Understanding Water Resources; Toby Sprunk, Eagle County Open Space; and Laura Makar, Pitkin County, Colorado]]>
These are two presentations from a panel moderated by Amy Beattie, Colorado Water Trust. Panelists included Josh Tenneson, Great Outdoors Colorado; Chris Sturm, Colorado Water Conservation Board; Caroline Bradford, Understanding Water Resources; Toby Sprunk, Eagle County Open Space; and Laura Makar, Pitkin County, Colorado]]> Sat, 21 Jun 2014 17:08:52 GMT /slideshow/colorado-water-conservation-board-and-great-outdoors-colorado-funding-sources-for-rivers-chris-sturm-josh-tenneson/36147891 rshimoda2014@slideshare.net(rshimoda2014) Colorado water conservation board and great outdoors colorado funding sources for rivers - Chris Sturm, CWCB and Josh Tenneson, GOCO rshimoda2014 These are two presentations from a panel moderated by Amy Beattie, Colorado Water Trust. Panelists included Josh Tenneson, Great Outdoors Colorado; Chris Sturm, Colorado Water Conservation Board; Caroline Bradford, Understanding Water Resources; Toby Sprunk, Eagle County Open Space; and Laura Makar, Pitkin County, Colorado <img style="border:1px solid #C3E6D8;float:right;" alt="" src="https://cdn.slidesharecdn.com/ss_thumbnails/coloradowaterconservationboardandgreatoutdoorscoloradofundingsourcesforrivers-chrissturmjoshtenneson-140621170852-phpapp01-thumbnail.jpg?width=120&height=120&fit=bounds" /> These are two presentations from a panel moderated by Amy Beattie, Colorado Water Trust. Panelists included Josh Tenneson, Great Outdoors Colorado; Chris Sturm, Colorado Water Conservation Board; Caroline Bradford, Understanding Water Resources; Toby Sprunk, Eagle County Open Space; and Laura Makar, Pitkin County, Colorado

Colorado water conservation board and great outdoors colorado funding sources for rivers - Chris Sturm, CWCB and Josh Tenneson, GOCO from rshimoda2014

]]> 1706 5 https://cdn.slidesharecdn.com/ss_thumbnails/coloradowaterconservationboardandgreatoutdoorscoloradofundingsourcesforrivers-chrissturmjoshtenneson-140621170852-phpapp01-thumbnail.jpg?width=120&height=120&fit=bounds presentation Black http://activitystrea.ms/schema/1.0/post

http://activitystrea.ms/schema/1.0/posted

0 Federal funding for river projects - Stacey Ericksen, Jeff Shoemaker, Marge Price and David Howlett, William Haas /rshimoda2014/federal-funding-panel-plus-eriksen-stacey-rms-denver-presentation-april-2014-edits federalfundingpanelpluseriksenstacey-rmsdenverpresentationapril2014edits-140621170846-phpapp01
Advice from individuals who have created successful river restoration, water quality recreational improvement through private-public partnerships - Stacey Eriksen – USEPA Region 8 - Bill Haas – Federal Highway Administration, Colorado Division Office - Marge Price, David Howlett – Capitol Representatives - Jeff Shoemaker – The Greenway Foundation ]]>
Advice from individuals who have created successful river restoration, water quality recreational improvement through private-public partnerships - Stacey Eriksen – USEPA Region 8 - Bill Haas – Federal Highway Administration, Colorado Division Office - Marge Price, David Howlett – Capitol Representatives - Jeff Shoemaker – The Greenway Foundation ]]> Sat, 21 Jun 2014 17:08:46 GMT /rshimoda2014/federal-funding-panel-plus-eriksen-stacey-rms-denver-presentation-april-2014-edits rshimoda2014@slideshare.net(rshimoda2014) Federal funding for river projects - Stacey Ericksen, Jeff Shoemaker, Marge Price and David Howlett, William Haas rshimoda2014 Advice from individuals who have created successful river restoration, water quality recreational improvement through private-public partnerships - Stacey Eriksen – USEPA Region 8 - Bill Haas – Federal Highway Administration, Colorado Division Office - Marge Price, David Howlett – Capitol Representatives - Jeff Shoemaker – The Greenway Foundation <img style="border:1px solid #C3E6D8;float:right;" alt="" src="https://cdn.slidesharecdn.com/ss_thumbnails/federalfundingpanelpluseriksenstacey-rmsdenverpresentationapril2014edits-140621170846-phpapp01-thumbnail.jpg?width=120&height=120&fit=bounds" /> Advice from individuals who have created successful river restoration, water quality recreational improvement through private-public partnerships - Stacey Eriksen – USEPA Region 8 - Bill Haas – Federal Highway Administration, Colorado Division Office - Marge Price, David Howlett – Capitol Representatives - Jeff Shoemaker – The Greenway Foundation

Federal funding for river projects - Stacey Ericksen, Jeff Shoemaker, Marge Price and David Howlett, William Haas from rshimoda2014

]]> 740 6 https://cdn.slidesharecdn.com/ss_thumbnails/federalfundingpanelpluseriksenstacey-rmsdenverpresentationapril2014edits-140621170846-phpapp01-thumbnail.jpg?width=120&height=120&fit=bounds presentation Black http://activitystrea.ms/schema/1.0/post

http://activitystrea.ms/schema/1.0/posted

0 Managing a Wild and Scenic River - The Wild and Scenic Rivers Act and Comprehensive Management Plans - Brian Goldberg, and Randy Welsh, USDA Forest Service /slideshow/welsh-woods-goldberg-wsra-comprehensive-river-management-plans/36147388 welshwoodsgoldberg-wsracomprehensiverivermanagementplans-140621162739-phpapp02
This course presents agency responsibilities for managing a designated wild and scenic rivers (WSR). The content of this course is derived from Wild and Scenic River Management Responsibilities (March 2002), a technical report of the Interagency Wild and Scenic Rivers Council (Council) (www.rivers.gov/publications.html). Participation will result in increased understanding of the protection requirements associated with managing a designated WSR, and of the contents and key elements of a comprehensive river management plan (CRMP). This increased foundation will result in greater protection of each river’s values through development of its CRMP. After completing this course, participants will be able to: • Understand the provisions of the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act (WSRA) that guide management of a designated WSR. • Share the management implications of designation within the river-administering agency and with local, federal and state governments, tribal governments, landowners and nongovernmental organizations. • Provide guidance for decision makers relative to proposed projects and new decisions on federal lands prior to completion of the CRMP. • Know the general contents and key elements of a CRMP. • Develop an integrated approach for preparation of a CRMP. Participants will increase their knowledge in: • Protections provided in the WSRA. • The application of the protect and enhance mandate of Section 10(a) to interim management and development of a CRMP. • How to evaluate a proposed project or new decision on federal land prior to completion of a CRMP. • How to prepare a detailed river corridor boundary. • The protection and decision framework of a CRMP. • How to prepare a CRMP.]]>
This course presents agency responsibilities for managing a designated wild and scenic rivers (WSR). The content of this course is derived from Wild and Scenic River Management Responsibilities (March 2002), a technical report of the Interagency Wild and Scenic Rivers Council (Council) (www.rivers.gov/publications.html). Participation will result in increased understanding of the protection requirements associated with managing a designated WSR, and of the contents and key elements of a comprehensive river management plan (CRMP). This increased foundation will result in greater protection of each river’s values through development of its CRMP. After completing this course, participants will be able to: • Understand the provisions of the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act (WSRA) that guide management of a designated WSR. • Share the management implications of designation within the river-administering agency and with local, federal and state governments, tribal governments, landowners and nongovernmental organizations. • Provide guidance for decision makers relative to proposed projects and new decisions on federal lands prior to completion of the CRMP. • Know the general contents and key elements of a CRMP. • Develop an integrated approach for preparation of a CRMP. Participants will increase their knowledge in: • Protections provided in the WSRA. • The application of the protect and enhance mandate of Section 10(a) to interim management and development of a CRMP. • How to evaluate a proposed project or new decision on federal land prior to completion of a CRMP. • How to prepare a detailed river corridor boundary. • The protection and decision framework of a CRMP. • How to prepare a CRMP.]]> Sat, 21 Jun 2014 16:27:39 GMT /slideshow/welsh-woods-goldberg-wsra-comprehensive-river-management-plans/36147388 rshimoda2014@slideshare.net(rshimoda2014) Managing a Wild and Scenic River - The Wild and Scenic Rivers Act and Comprehensive Management Plans - Brian Goldberg, and Randy Welsh, USDA Forest Service rshimoda2014 This course presents agency responsibilities for managing a designated wild and scenic rivers (WSR). The content of this course is derived from Wild and Scenic River Management Responsibilities (March 2002), a technical report of the Interagency Wild and Scenic Rivers Council (Council) (www.rivers.gov/publications.html). Participation will result in increased understanding of the protection requirements associated with managing a designated WSR, and of the contents and key elements of a comprehensive river management plan (CRMP). This increased foundation will result in greater protection of each river’s values through development of its CRMP. After completing this course, participants will be able to: • Understand the provisions of the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act (WSRA) that guide management of a designated WSR. • Share the management implications of designation within the river-administering agency and with local, federal and state governments, tribal governments, landowners and nongovernmental organizations. • Provide guidance for decision makers relative to proposed projects and new decisions on federal lands prior to completion of the CRMP. • Know the general contents and key elements of a CRMP. • Develop an integrated approach for preparation of a CRMP. Participants will increase their knowledge in: • Protections provided in the WSRA. • The application of the protect and enhance mandate of Section 10(a) to interim management and development of a CRMP. • How to evaluate a proposed project or new decision on federal land prior to completion of a CRMP. • How to prepare a detailed river corridor boundary. • The protection and decision framework of a CRMP. • How to prepare a CRMP. <img style="border:1px solid #C3E6D8;float:right;" alt="" src="https://cdn.slidesharecdn.com/ss_thumbnails/welshwoodsgoldberg-wsracomprehensiverivermanagementplans-140621162739-phpapp02-thumbnail.jpg?width=120&height=120&fit=bounds" /> This course presents agency responsibilities for managing a designated wild and scenic rivers (WSR). The content of this course is derived from Wild and Scenic River Management Responsibilities (March 2002), a technical report of the Interagency Wild and Scenic Rivers Council (Council) (www.rivers.gov/publications.html). Participation will result in increased understanding of the protection requirements associated with managing a designated WSR, and of the contents and key elements of a comprehensive river management plan (CRMP). This increased foundation will result in greater protection of each river’s values through development of its CRMP. After completing this course, participants will be able to: • Understand the provisions of the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act (WSRA) that guide management of a designated WSR. • Share the management implications of designation within the river-administering agency and with local, federal and state governments, tribal governments, landowners and nongovernmental organizations. • Provide guidance for decision makers relative to proposed projects and new decisions on federal lands prior to completion of the CRMP. • Know the general contents and key elements of a CRMP. • Develop an integrated approach for preparation of a CRMP. Participants will increase their knowledge in: • Protections provided in the WSRA. • The application of the protect and enhance mandate of Section 10(a) to interim management and development of a CRMP. • How to evaluate a proposed project or new decision on federal land prior to completion of a CRMP. • How to prepare a detailed river corridor boundary. • The protection and decision framework of a CRMP. • How to prepare a CRMP.

Managing a Wild and Scenic River - The Wild and Scenic Rivers Act and Comprehensive Management Plans - Brian Goldberg, and Randy Welsh, USDA Forest Service from rshimoda2014

]]> 805 7 https://cdn.slidesharecdn.com/ss_thumbnails/welshwoodsgoldberg-wsracomprehensiverivermanagementplans-140621162739-phpapp02-thumbnail.jpg?width=120&height=120&fit=bounds presentation Black http://activitystrea.ms/schema/1.0/post

http://activitystrea.ms/schema/1.0/posted

0 Section 7 Determinations – How to complete a Section 7 - Randy Welsh, Steve Chesterton - USDA Forest Service /slideshow/welsh-r-and-chesterto-s-section-7-wsra/36147381 welshrandchestertos-section7wsra-140621162722-phpapp01
This course presents an introduction to and how to complete a Section 7 Determination for the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act (WSRA). The content of this course is derived from Wild and Scenic Rivers Act: Section 7, a technical report of the Interagency Wild and Scenic Rivers Council (Council) (www.rivers.gov/publications.html). Participation will result in improvements in future applications of Section 7, based on increased knowledge of its intent, content and procedures. After completing this course, participants will be able to: • Apply appropriate evaluative standards. • Develop an integrated approach with appropriate interdisciplinary team members. • Conduct an analysis adequate to support the determination. • Provide early consultation/collaboration to federal assisting agency. • Share information with landowners, local and state governments, and nongovernmental organizations. Participants will increase their knowledge in: • What a water resources project is under Section 7 of the WSRA. • How to apply Section 7 to state-administered, federally designated rivers; congressionally designated rivers; and congressionally authorized study rivers. • Definitions. • Roles of the involved agencies. • Evaluation standards for a designated river. • Evaluation standards for a congressionally authorized study river. • Evaluation procedures. • The timing of a Section 7 analysis and determination, and the responsible official. • Riverine stewardship.]]>
This course presents an introduction to and how to complete a Section 7 Determination for the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act (WSRA). The content of this course is derived from Wild and Scenic Rivers Act: Section 7, a technical report of the Interagency Wild and Scenic Rivers Council (Council) (www.rivers.gov/publications.html). Participation will result in improvements in future applications of Section 7, based on increased knowledge of its intent, content and procedures. After completing this course, participants will be able to: • Apply appropriate evaluative standards. • Develop an integrated approach with appropriate interdisciplinary team members. • Conduct an analysis adequate to support the determination. • Provide early consultation/collaboration to federal assisting agency. • Share information with landowners, local and state governments, and nongovernmental organizations. Participants will increase their knowledge in: • What a water resources project is under Section 7 of the WSRA. • How to apply Section 7 to state-administered, federally designated rivers; congressionally designated rivers; and congressionally authorized study rivers. • Definitions. • Roles of the involved agencies. • Evaluation standards for a designated river. • Evaluation standards for a congressionally authorized study river. • Evaluation procedures. • The timing of a Section 7 analysis and determination, and the responsible official. • Riverine stewardship.]]> Sat, 21 Jun 2014 16:27:22 GMT /slideshow/welsh-r-and-chesterto-s-section-7-wsra/36147381 rshimoda2014@slideshare.net(rshimoda2014) Section 7 Determinations – How to complete a Section 7 - Randy Welsh, Steve Chesterton - USDA Forest Service rshimoda2014 This course presents an introduction to and how to complete a Section 7 Determination for the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act (WSRA). The content of this course is derived from Wild and Scenic Rivers Act: Section 7, a technical report of the Interagency Wild and Scenic Rivers Council (Council) (www.rivers.gov/publications.html). Participation will result in improvements in future applications of Section 7, based on increased knowledge of its intent, content and procedures. After completing this course, participants will be able to: • Apply appropriate evaluative standards. • Develop an integrated approach with appropriate interdisciplinary team members. • Conduct an analysis adequate to support the determination. • Provide early consultation/collaboration to federal assisting agency. • Share information with landowners, local and state governments, and nongovernmental organizations. Participants will increase their knowledge in: • What a water resources project is under Section 7 of the WSRA. • How to apply Section 7 to state-administered, federally designated rivers; congressionally designated rivers; and congressionally authorized study rivers. • Definitions. • Roles of the involved agencies. • Evaluation standards for a designated river. • Evaluation standards for a congressionally authorized study river. • Evaluation procedures. • The timing of a Section 7 analysis and determination, and the responsible official. • Riverine stewardship. <img style="border:1px solid #C3E6D8;float:right;" alt="" src="https://cdn.slidesharecdn.com/ss_thumbnails/welshrandchestertos-section7wsra-140621162722-phpapp01-thumbnail.jpg?width=120&height=120&fit=bounds" /> This course presents an introduction to and how to complete a Section 7 Determination for the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act (WSRA). The content of this course is derived from Wild and Scenic Rivers Act: Section 7, a technical report of the Interagency Wild and Scenic Rivers Council (Council) (www.rivers.gov/publications.html). Participation will result in improvements in future applications of Section 7, based on increased knowledge of its intent, content and procedures. After completing this course, participants will be able to: • Apply appropriate evaluative standards. • Develop an integrated approach with appropriate interdisciplinary team members. • Conduct an analysis adequate to support the determination. • Provide early consultation/collaboration to federal assisting agency. • Share information with landowners, local and state governments, and nongovernmental organizations. Participants will increase their knowledge in: • What a water resources project is under Section 7 of the WSRA. • How to apply Section 7 to state-administered, federally designated rivers; congressionally designated rivers; and congressionally authorized study rivers. • Definitions. • Roles of the involved agencies. • Evaluation standards for a designated river. • Evaluation standards for a congressionally authorized study river. • Evaluation procedures. • The timing of a Section 7 analysis and determination, and the responsible official. • Riverine stewardship.

Section 7 Determinations – How to complete a Section 7 - Randy Welsh, Steve Chesterton - USDA Forest Service from rshimoda2014

]]> 2046 10 https://cdn.slidesharecdn.com/ss_thumbnails/welshrandchestertos-section7wsra-140621162722-phpapp01-thumbnail.jpg?width=120&height=120&fit=bounds presentation White http://activitystrea.ms/schema/1.0/post

http://activitystrea.ms/schema/1.0/posted

0 Wild and Scenic River Study Process – How to complete a WSR Study - Cassie Thomas and Jim MacCartney, National Park Service /slideshow/thomas-c-and-mac-cartnery-j-wild-and-scenic-river-study-process/36147378 thomascandmaccartneryj-wildandscenicriverstudyprocess-140621162705-phpapp01
This course presents an introduction to complete a the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act (WSRA) Study Process for eligible or suitable river segments. The content of this course is derived from Wild and Scenic Rivers Act: Wild and Scenic River Study Process, a technical report of the Interagency Wild and Scenic Rivers Council (Council) (www.rivers.gov/publications.html). Participation will result in improvements in future applications of the Wild and Scenic River Study process, for both eligible and suitable river segments, based on increased knowledge of its intent, content and procedures. After completing this course, participants will be able to: • Apply the correct study methodology for a Wild and Scenic River study. • Develop an integrated approach with appropriate interdisciplinary team members for the study process. • Conduct the study, including public involvement. • Share information with landowners, local and state governments, and nongovernmental organizations. Participants will increase their knowledge in: • The Wild and Scenic River study process requirements of the WSRA. • The sources of information for rivers to consider in the study process. • The differences between eligible and suitable river segments. • The role of ORV’s in the study process. • The differences in WSR classification and how to apply them to study segments. • The requirements for interim management direction for eligible and suitable river segments.]]>
This course presents an introduction to complete a the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act (WSRA) Study Process for eligible or suitable river segments. The content of this course is derived from Wild and Scenic Rivers Act: Wild and Scenic River Study Process, a technical report of the Interagency Wild and Scenic Rivers Council (Council) (www.rivers.gov/publications.html). Participation will result in improvements in future applications of the Wild and Scenic River Study process, for both eligible and suitable river segments, based on increased knowledge of its intent, content and procedures. After completing this course, participants will be able to: • Apply the correct study methodology for a Wild and Scenic River study. • Develop an integrated approach with appropriate interdisciplinary team members for the study process. • Conduct the study, including public involvement. • Share information with landowners, local and state governments, and nongovernmental organizations. Participants will increase their knowledge in: • The Wild and Scenic River study process requirements of the WSRA. • The sources of information for rivers to consider in the study process. • The differences between eligible and suitable river segments. • The role of ORV’s in the study process. • The differences in WSR classification and how to apply them to study segments. • The requirements for interim management direction for eligible and suitable river segments.]]> Sat, 21 Jun 2014 16:27:05 GMT /slideshow/thomas-c-and-mac-cartnery-j-wild-and-scenic-river-study-process/36147378 rshimoda2014@slideshare.net(rshimoda2014) Wild and Scenic River Study Process – How to complete a WSR Study - Cassie Thomas and Jim MacCartney, National Park Service rshimoda2014 This course presents an introduction to complete a the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act (WSRA) Study Process for eligible or suitable river segments. The content of this course is derived from Wild and Scenic Rivers Act: Wild and Scenic River Study Process, a technical report of the Interagency Wild and Scenic Rivers Council (Council) (www.rivers.gov/publications.html). Participation will result in improvements in future applications of the Wild and Scenic River Study process, for both eligible and suitable river segments, based on increased knowledge of its intent, content and procedures. After completing this course, participants will be able to: • Apply the correct study methodology for a Wild and Scenic River study. • Develop an integrated approach with appropriate interdisciplinary team members for the study process. • Conduct the study, including public involvement. • Share information with landowners, local and state governments, and nongovernmental organizations. Participants will increase their knowledge in: • The Wild and Scenic River study process requirements of the WSRA. • The sources of information for rivers to consider in the study process. • The differences between eligible and suitable river segments. • The role of ORV’s in the study process. • The differences in WSR classification and how to apply them to study segments. • The requirements for interim management direction for eligible and suitable river segments. <img style="border:1px solid #C3E6D8;float:right;" alt="" src="https://cdn.slidesharecdn.com/ss_thumbnails/thomascandmaccartneryj-wildandscenicriverstudyprocess-140621162705-phpapp01-thumbnail.jpg?width=120&height=120&fit=bounds" /> This course presents an introduction to complete a the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act (WSRA) Study Process for eligible or suitable river segments. The content of this course is derived from Wild and Scenic Rivers Act: Wild and Scenic River Study Process, a technical report of the Interagency Wild and Scenic Rivers Council (Council) (www.rivers.gov/publications.html). Participation will result in improvements in future applications of the Wild and Scenic River Study process, for both eligible and suitable river segments, based on increased knowledge of its intent, content and procedures. After completing this course, participants will be able to: • Apply the correct study methodology for a Wild and Scenic River study. • Develop an integrated approach with appropriate interdisciplinary team members for the study process. • Conduct the study, including public involvement. • Share information with landowners, local and state governments, and nongovernmental organizations. Participants will increase their knowledge in: • The Wild and Scenic River study process requirements of the WSRA. • The sources of information for rivers to consider in the study process. • The differences between eligible and suitable river segments. • The role of ORV’s in the study process. • The differences in WSR classification and how to apply them to study segments. • The requirements for interim management direction for eligible and suitable river segments.

Wild and Scenic River Study Process – How to complete a WSR Study - Cassie Thomas and Jim MacCartney, National Park Service from rshimoda2014

]]> 619 4 https://cdn.slidesharecdn.com/ss_thumbnails/thomascandmaccartneryj-wildandscenicriverstudyprocess-140621162705-phpapp01-thumbnail.jpg?width=120&height=120&fit=bounds presentation White http://activitystrea.ms/schema/1.0/post

http://activitystrea.ms/schema/1.0/posted

0 Understanding and Managing Visitor Use on the Virgin River, Utah - Ericka Pilcher, Tracy Atkins, PE, AICP, and Kezia Nielsen - National Park Service /slideshow/pilcher-e-understanding-and-managing-visitor-use-on-virgin-river-utah/36147376 pilchere-understandingandmanagingvisitoruseonvirginriverutah-140621162702-phpapp01
This session describes lessons learned while addressing visitor use management and visitor capacity during the development of the Comprehensive River Management Plan for the Virgin River at Zion National Park and adjacent BLM Wilderness. This plan used a proactive and adaptive process of planning for and managing characteristics of visitor use and its physical and social setting. The process provides a variety of strategies and tools to sustain desired conditions for river values and provides the framework within which visitor capacity should be addressed when necessary. The plan followed guidance from both the Interagency Wild and Scenic Rivers Coordination Council (IWSRCC) and the Interagency Visitor Use Management Council (IVUMC). Updates on the work of the IVUMC will be provided during this session. The IVUMC collaborated with the IWSRCC on their guidebook for “Addressing User Capacities in Comprehensive River Management Plans”. The IVUMC is also working to complete “how-to” guidebooks for the visitor use management framework, visitor capacity, and indicators and thresholds. Progress on these topics will be discussed in the context of the Virgin River planning effort. Key Learning Objectives: 1) Understanding the planning framework for visitor use on Wild and Scenic Rivers 2) Gaining awareness about progress for visitor use management guidance on Wild and Scenic Rivers 3) Learning about how to address visitor capacity on Wild and Scenic Rivers]]>
This session describes lessons learned while addressing visitor use management and visitor capacity during the development of the Comprehensive River Management Plan for the Virgin River at Zion National Park and adjacent BLM Wilderness. This plan used a proactive and adaptive process of planning for and managing characteristics of visitor use and its physical and social setting. The process provides a variety of strategies and tools to sustain desired conditions for river values and provides the framework within which visitor capacity should be addressed when necessary. The plan followed guidance from both the Interagency Wild and Scenic Rivers Coordination Council (IWSRCC) and the Interagency Visitor Use Management Council (IVUMC). Updates on the work of the IVUMC will be provided during this session. The IVUMC collaborated with the IWSRCC on their guidebook for “Addressing User Capacities in Comprehensive River Management Plans”. The IVUMC is also working to complete “how-to” guidebooks for the visitor use management framework, visitor capacity, and indicators and thresholds. Progress on these topics will be discussed in the context of the Virgin River planning effort. Key Learning Objectives: 1) Understanding the planning framework for visitor use on Wild and Scenic Rivers 2) Gaining awareness about progress for visitor use management guidance on Wild and Scenic Rivers 3) Learning about how to address visitor capacity on Wild and Scenic Rivers]]> Sat, 21 Jun 2014 16:27:02 GMT /slideshow/pilcher-e-understanding-and-managing-visitor-use-on-virgin-river-utah/36147376 rshimoda2014@slideshare.net(rshimoda2014) Understanding and Managing Visitor Use on the Virgin River, Utah - Ericka Pilcher, Tracy Atkins, PE, AICP, and Kezia Nielsen - National Park Service rshimoda2014 This session describes lessons learned while addressing visitor use management and visitor capacity during the development of the Comprehensive River Management Plan for the Virgin River at Zion National Park and adjacent BLM Wilderness. This plan used a proactive and adaptive process of planning for and managing characteristics of visitor use and its physical and social setting. The process provides a variety of strategies and tools to sustain desired conditions for river values and provides the framework within which visitor capacity should be addressed when necessary. The plan followed guidance from both the Interagency Wild and Scenic Rivers Coordination Council (IWSRCC) and the Interagency Visitor Use Management Council (IVUMC). Updates on the work of the IVUMC will be provided during this session. The IVUMC collaborated with the IWSRCC on their guidebook for “Addressing User Capacities in Comprehensive River Management Plans”. The IVUMC is also working to complete “how-to” guidebooks for the visitor use management framework, visitor capacity, and indicators and thresholds. Progress on these topics will be discussed in the context of the Virgin River planning effort. Key Learning Objectives: 1) Understanding the planning framework for visitor use on Wild and Scenic Rivers 2) Gaining awareness about progress for visitor use management guidance on Wild and Scenic Rivers 3) Learning about how to address visitor capacity on Wild and Scenic Rivers <img style="border:1px solid #C3E6D8;float:right;" alt="" src="https://cdn.slidesharecdn.com/ss_thumbnails/pilchere-understandingandmanagingvisitoruseonvirginriverutah-140621162702-phpapp01-thumbnail.jpg?width=120&height=120&fit=bounds" /> This session describes lessons learned while addressing visitor use management and visitor capacity during the development of the Comprehensive River Management Plan for the Virgin River at Zion National Park and adjacent BLM Wilderness. This plan used a proactive and adaptive process of planning for and managing characteristics of visitor use and its physical and social setting. The process provides a variety of strategies and tools to sustain desired conditions for river values and provides the framework within which visitor capacity should be addressed when necessary. The plan followed guidance from both the Interagency Wild and Scenic Rivers Coordination Council (IWSRCC) and the Interagency Visitor Use Management Council (IVUMC). Updates on the work of the IVUMC will be provided during this session. The IVUMC collaborated with the IWSRCC on their guidebook for “Addressing User Capacities in Comprehensive River Management Plans”. The IVUMC is also working to complete “how-to” guidebooks for the visitor use management framework, visitor capacity, and indicators and thresholds. Progress on these topics will be discussed in the context of the Virgin River planning effort. Key Learning Objectives: 1) Understanding the planning framework for visitor use on Wild and Scenic Rivers 2) Gaining awareness about progress for visitor use management guidance on Wild and Scenic Rivers 3) Learning about how to address visitor capacity on Wild and Scenic Rivers

Understanding and Managing Visitor Use on the Virgin River, Utah - Ericka Pilcher, Tracy Atkins, PE, AICP, and Kezia Nielsen - National Park Service from rshimoda2014

]]> 745 10 https://cdn.slidesharecdn.com/ss_thumbnails/pilchere-understandingandmanagingvisitoruseonvirginriverutah-140621162702-phpapp01-thumbnail.jpg?width=120&height=120&fit=bounds presentation White http://activitystrea.ms/schema/1.0/post

http://activitystrea.ms/schema/1.0/posted

0 Managing Utah’s First Wild and Scenic River - Tracy Atkins, PE, AICP and Kezia Nielsen - National Park Service /slideshow/atkins-t-virgin-rivercmp/36147374 atkinst-virginrivercmp-140621162658-phpapp02
This session will describe the Wild and Scenic River planning framework used for the development of the Comprehensive River Management Plan for the Virgin River at Zion National Park and adjacent BLM Wilderness. NPS has developed a process that includes defining outstandingly remarkable values (ORVs), establishing goals and objectives for protecting river values, conducting boundary delineation, addressing development of lands and facilities, addressing visitor use management and capacity, evaluating water resource projects and instream flows, and establishing a monitoring strategy. This planning effort included river segments with very diverse visitation and management objectives – from highly developed frontcountry recreational segments to wild segments in designated Wilderness. This presentation will share outcomes of the planning process as well as lessons learned and on-going monitoring and planning efforts. Key Learning Objectives: 1) Understanding the planning framework for Wild and Scenic Rivers 2) Best practices for planning and managing use on Wild and Scenic Rivers 3) Strategies for managing a variety of river segments from frontcountry to Wilderness]]>
This session will describe the Wild and Scenic River planning framework used for the development of the Comprehensive River Management Plan for the Virgin River at Zion National Park and adjacent BLM Wilderness. NPS has developed a process that includes defining outstandingly remarkable values (ORVs), establishing goals and objectives for protecting river values, conducting boundary delineation, addressing development of lands and facilities, addressing visitor use management and capacity, evaluating water resource projects and instream flows, and establishing a monitoring strategy. This planning effort included river segments with very diverse visitation and management objectives – from highly developed frontcountry recreational segments to wild segments in designated Wilderness. This presentation will share outcomes of the planning process as well as lessons learned and on-going monitoring and planning efforts. Key Learning Objectives: 1) Understanding the planning framework for Wild and Scenic Rivers 2) Best practices for planning and managing use on Wild and Scenic Rivers 3) Strategies for managing a variety of river segments from frontcountry to Wilderness]]> Sat, 21 Jun 2014 16:26:58 GMT /slideshow/atkins-t-virgin-rivercmp/36147374 rshimoda2014@slideshare.net(rshimoda2014) Managing Utah’s First Wild and Scenic River - Tracy Atkins, PE, AICP and Kezia Nielsen - National Park Service rshimoda2014 This session will describe the Wild and Scenic River planning framework used for the development of the Comprehensive River Management Plan for the Virgin River at Zion National Park and adjacent BLM Wilderness. NPS has developed a process that includes defining outstandingly remarkable values (ORVs), establishing goals and objectives for protecting river values, conducting boundary delineation, addressing development of lands and facilities, addressing visitor use management and capacity, evaluating water resource projects and instream flows, and establishing a monitoring strategy. This planning effort included river segments with very diverse visitation and management objectives – from highly developed frontcountry recreational segments to wild segments in designated Wilderness. This presentation will share outcomes of the planning process as well as lessons learned and on-going monitoring and planning efforts. Key Learning Objectives: 1) Understanding the planning framework for Wild and Scenic Rivers 2) Best practices for planning and managing use on Wild and Scenic Rivers 3) Strategies for managing a variety of river segments from frontcountry to Wilderness <img style="border:1px solid #C3E6D8;float:right;" alt="" src="https://cdn.slidesharecdn.com/ss_thumbnails/atkinst-virginrivercmp-140621162658-phpapp02-thumbnail.jpg?width=120&height=120&fit=bounds" /> This session will describe the Wild and Scenic River planning framework used for the development of the Comprehensive River Management Plan for the Virgin River at Zion National Park and adjacent BLM Wilderness. NPS has developed a process that includes defining outstandingly remarkable values (ORVs), establishing goals and objectives for protecting river values, conducting boundary delineation, addressing development of lands and facilities, addressing visitor use management and capacity, evaluating water resource projects and instream flows, and establishing a monitoring strategy. This planning effort included river segments with very diverse visitation and management objectives – from highly developed frontcountry recreational segments to wild segments in designated Wilderness. This presentation will share outcomes of the planning process as well as lessons learned and on-going monitoring and planning efforts. Key Learning Objectives: 1) Understanding the planning framework for Wild and Scenic Rivers 2) Best practices for planning and managing use on Wild and Scenic Rivers 3) Strategies for managing a variety of river segments from frontcountry to Wilderness

Managing Utah’s First Wild and Scenic River - Tracy Atkins, PE, AICP and Kezia Nielsen - National Park Service from rshimoda2014

]]> 1093 8 https://cdn.slidesharecdn.com/ss_thumbnails/atkinst-virginrivercmp-140621162658-phpapp02-thumbnail.jpg?width=120&height=120&fit=bounds presentation White http://activitystrea.ms/schema/1.0/post

http://activitystrea.ms/schema/1.0/posted

0 Wild and Scenic River Outstandingly Remarkable Value Identification and Assessment using Georeferenced Videomapping - Paul Ayers /slideshow/ayers-p-wsrorvidentification/36147368 ayerspwsrorvidentification-140621162637-phpapp01
Paul Ayers - Biosystems Engineering, University of Tennessee GPS-based river videomapping has been used to continuously map river systems at the National Park Service (NPS) Obed (45 miles) and Wekiva (12 miles) Wild and Scenic Rivers (WSR). River videomapping consists of continuously acquiring georeferenced video and river physical characteristics of river systems. Physical river features such as river width, depth, rugosity and sinuosity have been mapped in ArcGIS. In addition, substrate, river characteristic (pool, riffle, run), embeddedness and river infrastructure have been determined continuously. From these features, locations of wildlife habitat (including optimum endangered aquatic species habitat) and Outstandingly Remarkable Values (ORV) have be determined. ORV’s and human intrusion infrastructure (houses, docks, bridges, etc.) have been mapped at the Wekiva WSR. Dock density plots and associated images have been incorporated into the ArcGIS maps. Using the technology, “wild”, “scenic” and “recreational” ORV’s can be identified and mapped. The georeferenced video database of the Wild and Scenic River provides a snapshot of the existing ORV conditions that need to be mapped, monitored and managed. The video can be reviewed to detect river condition changes as impacts occur. ]]>
Paul Ayers - Biosystems Engineering, University of Tennessee GPS-based river videomapping has been used to continuously map river systems at the National Park Service (NPS) Obed (45 miles) and Wekiva (12 miles) Wild and Scenic Rivers (WSR). River videomapping consists of continuously acquiring georeferenced video and river physical characteristics of river systems. Physical river features such as river width, depth, rugosity and sinuosity have been mapped in ArcGIS. In addition, substrate, river characteristic (pool, riffle, run), embeddedness and river infrastructure have been determined continuously. From these features, locations of wildlife habitat (including optimum endangered aquatic species habitat) and Outstandingly Remarkable Values (ORV) have be determined. ORV’s and human intrusion infrastructure (houses, docks, bridges, etc.) have been mapped at the Wekiva WSR. Dock density plots and associated images have been incorporated into the ArcGIS maps. Using the technology, “wild”, “scenic” and “recreational” ORV’s can be identified and mapped. The georeferenced video database of the Wild and Scenic River provides a snapshot of the existing ORV conditions that need to be mapped, monitored and managed. The video can be reviewed to detect river condition changes as impacts occur. ]]> Sat, 21 Jun 2014 16:26:37 GMT /slideshow/ayers-p-wsrorvidentification/36147368 rshimoda2014@slideshare.net(rshimoda2014) Wild and Scenic River Outstandingly Remarkable Value Identification and Assessment using Georeferenced Videomapping - Paul Ayers rshimoda2014 Paul Ayers - Biosystems Engineering, University of Tennessee GPS-based river videomapping has been used to continuously map river systems at the National Park Service (NPS) Obed (45 miles) and Wekiva (12 miles) Wild and Scenic Rivers (WSR). River videomapping consists of continuously acquiring georeferenced video and river physical characteristics of river systems. Physical river features such as river width, depth, rugosity and sinuosity have been mapped in ArcGIS. In addition, substrate, river characteristic (pool, riffle, run), embeddedness and river infrastructure have been determined continuously. From these features, locations of wildlife habitat (including optimum endangered aquatic species habitat) and Outstandingly Remarkable Values (ORV) have be determined. ORV’s and human intrusion infrastructure (houses, docks, bridges, etc.) have been mapped at the Wekiva WSR. Dock density plots and associated images have been incorporated into the ArcGIS maps. Using the technology, “wild”, “scenic” and “recreational” ORV’s can be identified and mapped. The georeferenced video database of the Wild and Scenic River provides a snapshot of the existing ORV conditions that need to be mapped, monitored and managed. The video can be reviewed to detect river condition changes as impacts occur. <img style="border:1px solid #C3E6D8;float:right;" alt="" src="https://cdn.slidesharecdn.com/ss_thumbnails/ayerspwsrorvidentification-140621162637-phpapp01-thumbnail.jpg?width=120&height=120&fit=bounds" /> Paul Ayers - Biosystems Engineering, University of Tennessee GPS-based river videomapping has been used to continuously map river systems at the National Park Service (NPS) Obed (45 miles) and Wekiva (12 miles) Wild and Scenic Rivers (WSR). River videomapping consists of continuously acquiring georeferenced video and river physical characteristics of river systems. Physical river features such as river width, depth, rugosity and sinuosity have been mapped in ArcGIS. In addition, substrate, river characteristic (pool, riffle, run), embeddedness and river infrastructure have been determined continuously. From these features, locations of wildlife habitat (including optimum endangered aquatic species habitat) and Outstandingly Remarkable Values (ORV) have be determined. ORV’s and human intrusion infrastructure (houses, docks, bridges, etc.) have been mapped at the Wekiva WSR. Dock density plots and associated images have been incorporated into the ArcGIS maps. Using the technology, “wild”, “scenic” and “recreational” ORV’s can be identified and mapped. The georeferenced video database of the Wild and Scenic River provides a snapshot of the existing ORV conditions that need to be mapped, monitored and managed. The video can be reviewed to detect river condition changes as impacts occur.

Wild and Scenic River Outstandingly Remarkable Value Identification and Assessment using Georeferenced Videomapping - Paul Ayers from rshimoda2014

]]> 638 5 https://cdn.slidesharecdn.com/ss_thumbnails/ayerspwsrorvidentification-140621162637-phpapp01-thumbnail.jpg?width=120&height=120&fit=bounds presentation White http://activitystrea.ms/schema/1.0/post

http://activitystrea.ms/schema/1.0/posted

0 The Energy / Water Nexus - Stacy Tellinghuisen, Western Resource Advocates /slideshow/tellinghuisen-s-energy-water-nexus-river-management-society/36147154 tellinghuisens-energywaternexusrivermanagementsociety-140621160827-phpapp02
Water Used to Develop Energy Stacy Tellinghuisen More water is used to produce electricity than for any other use in the United States. In the arid West, water is consumed to cool down electrical generating plants that burn coal or natural gas, while in the East water withdrawn from rivers circulates through power plants and is then returned to the river at higher temperatures. This presentation will address the pressures that energy production brings to our rivers, especially in light of warming temperatures. As natural gas production increases in both the West and East, water pumped into the ground for fracking is lost to the system since it is fully consumed. Twenty to fifty acre feet is needed to drill each well, and as thousands of wells are drilled, the impact to local water supplies is growing. Fortunately, new technologies and conservation practices pose a solution. Water used to produce energy can be saved if cities encourage water conservation (since energy is needed to move water). Renewable energy sources like wind and solar consume very little water. This presentation will address the problems that fossil fuels pose for rivers, and focus on technologies that can solve these problems. ]]>
Water Used to Develop Energy Stacy Tellinghuisen More water is used to produce electricity than for any other use in the United States. In the arid West, water is consumed to cool down electrical generating plants that burn coal or natural gas, while in the East water withdrawn from rivers circulates through power plants and is then returned to the river at higher temperatures. This presentation will address the pressures that energy production brings to our rivers, especially in light of warming temperatures. As natural gas production increases in both the West and East, water pumped into the ground for fracking is lost to the system since it is fully consumed. Twenty to fifty acre feet is needed to drill each well, and as thousands of wells are drilled, the impact to local water supplies is growing. Fortunately, new technologies and conservation practices pose a solution. Water used to produce energy can be saved if cities encourage water conservation (since energy is needed to move water). Renewable energy sources like wind and solar consume very little water. This presentation will address the problems that fossil fuels pose for rivers, and focus on technologies that can solve these problems. ]]> Sat, 21 Jun 2014 16:08:27 GMT /slideshow/tellinghuisen-s-energy-water-nexus-river-management-society/36147154 rshimoda2014@slideshare.net(rshimoda2014) The Energy / Water Nexus - Stacy Tellinghuisen, Western Resource Advocates rshimoda2014 Water Used to Develop Energy Stacy Tellinghuisen More water is used to produce electricity than for any other use in the United States. In the arid West, water is consumed to cool down electrical generating plants that burn coal or natural gas, while in the East water withdrawn from rivers circulates through power plants and is then returned to the river at higher temperatures. This presentation will address the pressures that energy production brings to our rivers, especially in light of warming temperatures. As natural gas production increases in both the West and East, water pumped into the ground for fracking is lost to the system since it is fully consumed. Twenty to fifty acre feet is needed to drill each well, and as thousands of wells are drilled, the impact to local water supplies is growing. Fortunately, new technologies and conservation practices pose a solution. Water used to produce energy can be saved if cities encourage water conservation (since energy is needed to move water). Renewable energy sources like wind and solar consume very little water. This presentation will address the problems that fossil fuels pose for rivers, and focus on technologies that can solve these problems. <img style="border:1px solid #C3E6D8;float:right;" alt="" src="https://cdn.slidesharecdn.com/ss_thumbnails/tellinghuisens-energywaternexusrivermanagementsociety-140621160827-phpapp02-thumbnail.jpg?width=120&height=120&fit=bounds" /> Water Used to Develop Energy Stacy Tellinghuisen More water is used to produce electricity than for any other use in the United States. In the arid West, water is consumed to cool down electrical generating plants that burn coal or natural gas, while in the East water withdrawn from rivers circulates through power plants and is then returned to the river at higher temperatures. This presentation will address the pressures that energy production brings to our rivers, especially in light of warming temperatures. As natural gas production increases in both the West and East, water pumped into the ground for fracking is lost to the system since it is fully consumed. Twenty to fifty acre feet is needed to drill each well, and as thousands of wells are drilled, the impact to local water supplies is growing. Fortunately, new technologies and conservation practices pose a solution. Water used to produce energy can be saved if cities encourage water conservation (since energy is needed to move water). Renewable energy sources like wind and solar consume very little water. This presentation will address the problems that fossil fuels pose for rivers, and focus on technologies that can solve these problems.

The Energy / Water Nexus - Stacy Tellinghuisen, Western Resource Advocates from rshimoda2014

]]> 631 7 https://cdn.slidesharecdn.com/ss_thumbnails/tellinghuisens-energywaternexusrivermanagementsociety-140621160827-phpapp02-thumbnail.jpg?width=120&height=120&fit=bounds presentation Black http://activitystrea.ms/schema/1.0/post

http://activitystrea.ms/schema/1.0/posted

0 Aligning Watershed and Habitat Protection for Conservation Success in the Raccoon Creek Watershed, Georgia - Lindsay Gardner /slideshow/gardner-l-rms-2014-presentation-gardner-final/36147150 gardnerl-rms2014presentationgardnerfinal-140621160820-phpapp02
Lindsay Gardner - Southeast Aquatics Resources Partnershp Nothing is more important than water for human health and the health of our fish and wildlife resources. Clean water and abundant habitat are critical to functional aquatic ecosystems with healthy populations of fish and wildlife. Successful aquatic resource conservation at the watershed level requires a multipronged approach working with local communities to restore ecologically impacted or impaired streams and put land use/habitat protections in place. The collaborative efforts of the Southeast Watershed Forum (SEWF), Southeast Aquatic Resources Partnership (SARP), The Nature Conservancy (TNC), the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service (USFWS), Georgia Wildlife Resources Division (GWRD), and other key partners in the Raccoon Creek area of the Etowah River Watershed, Georgia, an EPA priority watershed, provide a positive example of this holistic approach to watershed management. Building on the conservation planning, land protection and restoration efforts by TNC on Raccoon Creek, this partnership is successfully working with Paulding County stakeholders to identify conservation priorities and align watershed and conservation planning with county land use planning to ensure long-term benefits for prime habitat and water quality. This work encourages conservation-oriented growth practices and habitat protections to benefit fish and wildlife, like the Cherokee darter, and supports the regional habitat objectives of the SARP-directed Southeast Aquatic Habitat Plan, addressing threats to aquatic resources and key habitat protections. An outstanding example of how on-the-ground restoration of aquatic resources at the local level, the project also addresses national conservation priorities and demonstrates how through community-supported land use quality growth planning it is possible to develop a strategy and stewardship ethic to maintain these resources for generations to come. Contributors: Christine Olsenius, Jane Fowler (SEWF); Scott Robinson, Lindsay Gardner (SARP); Kathleen Owens (TNC). ]]>
Lindsay Gardner - Southeast Aquatics Resources Partnershp Nothing is more important than water for human health and the health of our fish and wildlife resources. Clean water and abundant habitat are critical to functional aquatic ecosystems with healthy populations of fish and wildlife. Successful aquatic resource conservation at the watershed level requires a multipronged approach working with local communities to restore ecologically impacted or impaired streams and put land use/habitat protections in place. The collaborative efforts of the Southeast Watershed Forum (SEWF), Southeast Aquatic Resources Partnership (SARP), The Nature Conservancy (TNC), the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service (USFWS), Georgia Wildlife Resources Division (GWRD), and other key partners in the Raccoon Creek area of the Etowah River Watershed, Georgia, an EPA priority watershed, provide a positive example of this holistic approach to watershed management. Building on the conservation planning, land protection and restoration efforts by TNC on Raccoon Creek, this partnership is successfully working with Paulding County stakeholders to identify conservation priorities and align watershed and conservation planning with county land use planning to ensure long-term benefits for prime habitat and water quality. This work encourages conservation-oriented growth practices and habitat protections to benefit fish and wildlife, like the Cherokee darter, and supports the regional habitat objectives of the SARP-directed Southeast Aquatic Habitat Plan, addressing threats to aquatic resources and key habitat protections. An outstanding example of how on-the-ground restoration of aquatic resources at the local level, the project also addresses national conservation priorities and demonstrates how through community-supported land use quality growth planning it is possible to develop a strategy and stewardship ethic to maintain these resources for generations to come. Contributors: Christine Olsenius, Jane Fowler (SEWF); Scott Robinson, Lindsay Gardner (SARP); Kathleen Owens (TNC). ]]> Sat, 21 Jun 2014 16:08:20 GMT /slideshow/gardner-l-rms-2014-presentation-gardner-final/36147150 rshimoda2014@slideshare.net(rshimoda2014) Aligning Watershed and Habitat Protection for Conservation Success in the Raccoon Creek Watershed, Georgia - Lindsay Gardner rshimoda2014 Lindsay Gardner - Southeast Aquatics Resources Partnershp Nothing is more important than water for human health and the health of our fish and wildlife resources. Clean water and abundant habitat are critical to functional aquatic ecosystems with healthy populations of fish and wildlife. Successful aquatic resource conservation at the watershed level requires a multipronged approach working with local communities to restore ecologically impacted or impaired streams and put land use/habitat protections in place. The collaborative efforts of the Southeast Watershed Forum (SEWF), Southeast Aquatic Resources Partnership (SARP), The Nature Conservancy (TNC), the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service (USFWS), Georgia Wildlife Resources Division (GWRD), and other key partners in the Raccoon Creek area of the Etowah River Watershed, Georgia, an EPA priority watershed, provide a positive example of this holistic approach to watershed management. Building on the conservation planning, land protection and restoration efforts by TNC on Raccoon Creek, this partnership is successfully working with Paulding County stakeholders to identify conservation priorities and align watershed and conservation planning with county land use planning to ensure long-term benefits for prime habitat and water quality. This work encourages conservation-oriented growth practices and habitat protections to benefit fish and wildlife, like the Cherokee darter, and supports the regional habitat objectives of the SARP-directed Southeast Aquatic Habitat Plan, addressing threats to aquatic resources and key habitat protections. An outstanding example of how on-the-ground restoration of aquatic resources at the local level, the project also addresses national conservation priorities and demonstrates how through community-supported land use quality growth planning it is possible to develop a strategy and stewardship ethic to maintain these resources for generations to come. Contributors: Christine Olsenius, Jane Fowler (SEWF); Scott Robinson, Lindsay Gardner (SARP); Kathleen Owens (TNC). <img style="border:1px solid #C3E6D8;float:right;" alt="" src="https://cdn.slidesharecdn.com/ss_thumbnails/gardnerl-rms2014presentationgardnerfinal-140621160820-phpapp02-thumbnail.jpg?width=120&height=120&fit=bounds" /> Lindsay Gardner - Southeast Aquatics Resources Partnershp Nothing is more important than water for human health and the health of our fish and wildlife resources. Clean water and abundant habitat are critical to functional aquatic ecosystems with healthy populations of fish and wildlife. Successful aquatic resource conservation at the watershed level requires a multipronged approach working with local communities to restore ecologically impacted or impaired streams and put land use/habitat protections in place. The collaborative efforts of the Southeast Watershed Forum (SEWF), Southeast Aquatic Resources Partnership (SARP), The Nature Conservancy (TNC), the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service (USFWS), Georgia Wildlife Resources Division (GWRD), and other key partners in the Raccoon Creek area of the Etowah River Watershed, Georgia, an EPA priority watershed, provide a positive example of this holistic approach to watershed management. Building on the conservation planning, land protection and restoration efforts by TNC on Raccoon Creek, this partnership is successfully working with Paulding County stakeholders to identify conservation priorities and align watershed and conservation planning with county land use planning to ensure long-term benefits for prime habitat and water quality. This work encourages conservation-oriented growth practices and habitat protections to benefit fish and wildlife, like the Cherokee darter, and supports the regional habitat objectives of the SARP-directed Southeast Aquatic Habitat Plan, addressing threats to aquatic resources and key habitat protections. An outstanding example of how on-the-ground restoration of aquatic resources at the local level, the project also addresses national conservation priorities and demonstrates how through community-supported land use quality growth planning it is possible to develop a strategy and stewardship ethic to maintain these resources for generations to come. Contributors: Christine Olsenius, Jane Fowler (SEWF); Scott Robinson, Lindsay Gardner (SARP); Kathleen Owens (TNC).

Aligning Watershed and Habitat Protection for Conservation Success in the Raccoon Creek Watershed, Georgia - Lindsay Gardner from rshimoda2014

]]> 685 6 https://cdn.slidesharecdn.com/ss_thumbnails/gardnerl-rms2014presentationgardnerfinal-140621160820-phpapp02-thumbnail.jpg?width=120&height=120&fit=bounds presentation Black http://activitystrea.ms/schema/1.0/post

http://activitystrea.ms/schema/1.0/posted

0 How to Make A Difference Commenting on an Environmental Impact Statement - Mary O'Brien, PhD /slideshow/obrien-m-nepa-alternatives/36147147 obrienm-nepaalternatives-140621160814-phpapp01
Mary O'Brien - Utah Forest Program Director, Grand Canyon Trust This session focuses on how to make a difference during the all-important scoping comment period of an environmental impact statement process. As well as suggesting significant issues for analysis in the EIS, and providing scientific information for the analysis, consider submitting a full alternative to be analyzed in detail in the EIS. It’s been done with great success, both before and during the scoping period.]]>
Mary O'Brien - Utah Forest Program Director, Grand Canyon Trust This session focuses on how to make a difference during the all-important scoping comment period of an environmental impact statement process. As well as suggesting significant issues for analysis in the EIS, and providing scientific information for the analysis, consider submitting a full alternative to be analyzed in detail in the EIS. It’s been done with great success, both before and during the scoping period.]]> Sat, 21 Jun 2014 16:08:14 GMT /slideshow/obrien-m-nepa-alternatives/36147147 rshimoda2014@slideshare.net(rshimoda2014) How to Make A Difference Commenting on an Environmental Impact Statement - Mary O'Brien, PhD rshimoda2014 Mary O'Brien - Utah Forest Program Director, Grand Canyon Trust This session focuses on how to make a difference during the all-important scoping comment period of an environmental impact statement process. As well as suggesting significant issues for analysis in the EIS, and providing scientific information for the analysis, consider submitting a full alternative to be analyzed in detail in the EIS. It’s been done with great success, both before and during the scoping period. <img style="border:1px solid #C3E6D8;float:right;" alt="" src="https://cdn.slidesharecdn.com/ss_thumbnails/obrienm-nepaalternatives-140621160814-phpapp01-thumbnail.jpg?width=120&height=120&fit=bounds" /> Mary O'Brien - Utah Forest Program Director, Grand Canyon Trust This session focuses on how to make a difference during the all-important scoping comment period of an environmental impact statement process. As well as suggesting significant issues for analysis in the EIS, and providing scientific information for the analysis, consider submitting a full alternative to be analyzed in detail in the EIS. It’s been done with great success, both before and during the scoping period.

How to Make A Difference Commenting on an Environmental Impact Statement - Mary O'Brien, PhD from rshimoda2014

]]> 315 4 https://cdn.slidesharecdn.com/ss_thumbnails/obrienm-nepaalternatives-140621160814-phpapp01-thumbnail.jpg?width=120&height=120&fit=bounds presentation Black http://activitystrea.ms/schema/1.0/post

http://activitystrea.ms/schema/1.0/posted

0 National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) Writing Environmental Assessments (EAs), Part 3 of 3 - Helen Clough and Judy Kurtzman /slideshow/nepa-writing-e-as-part-3-36146747/36146747 nepa-writingeaspart3-140621153444-phpapp01
Helen Clough - Department of the Interior, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, retired, Judith Kurtzman - Utah State University Writing clear Environmental Assessments (EAs) as required by the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) is critical to successful implementation of the law and more importantly good decisions. The NEPA process must be well documented in clear language so that the proposals, alternatives and the environmental effects of proposals and alternatives are clearing explained. Often the NEPA analysis is not well documented resulting in costly delays in projects as appeals and litigation occur regarding the NEPA analysis. This training session is a continuation of the materials presented in Writing Environmental Assessments, Parts 1 and 2. Resource-specific analysis (for examples, effects on wildlife, effects on recreation, effects on water quality) and cumulative impact analysis (effects of past, present, and “reasonably foreseeable” future actions) will be explored. Mitigation and monitoring will be addressed. As with the other NEPA sessions examples relevant to river management will be explored and critiqued. Ample time is allotted for discussion and questions from participants. ]]>
Helen Clough - Department of the Interior, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, retired, Judith Kurtzman - Utah State University Writing clear Environmental Assessments (EAs) as required by the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) is critical to successful implementation of the law and more importantly good decisions. The NEPA process must be well documented in clear language so that the proposals, alternatives and the environmental effects of proposals and alternatives are clearing explained. Often the NEPA analysis is not well documented resulting in costly delays in projects as appeals and litigation occur regarding the NEPA analysis. This training session is a continuation of the materials presented in Writing Environmental Assessments, Parts 1 and 2. Resource-specific analysis (for examples, effects on wildlife, effects on recreation, effects on water quality) and cumulative impact analysis (effects of past, present, and “reasonably foreseeable” future actions) will be explored. Mitigation and monitoring will be addressed. As with the other NEPA sessions examples relevant to river management will be explored and critiqued. Ample time is allotted for discussion and questions from participants. ]]> Sat, 21 Jun 2014 15:34:43 GMT /slideshow/nepa-writing-e-as-part-3-36146747/36146747 rshimoda2014@slideshare.net(rshimoda2014) National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) Writing Environmental Assessments (EAs), Part 3 of 3 - Helen Clough and Judy Kurtzman rshimoda2014 Helen Clough - Department of the Interior, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, retired, Judith Kurtzman - Utah State University Writing clear Environmental Assessments (EAs) as required by the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) is critical to successful implementation of the law and more importantly good decisions. The NEPA process must be well documented in clear language so that the proposals, alternatives and the environmental effects of proposals and alternatives are clearing explained. Often the NEPA analysis is not well documented resulting in costly delays in projects as appeals and litigation occur regarding the NEPA analysis. This training session is a continuation of the materials presented in Writing Environmental Assessments, Parts 1 and 2. Resource-specific analysis (for examples, effects on wildlife, effects on recreation, effects on water quality) and cumulative impact analysis (effects of past, present, and “reasonably foreseeable” future actions) will be explored. Mitigation and monitoring will be addressed. As with the other NEPA sessions examples relevant to river management will be explored and critiqued. Ample time is allotted for discussion and questions from participants. <img style="border:1px solid #C3E6D8;float:right;" alt="" src="https://cdn.slidesharecdn.com/ss_thumbnails/nepa-writingeaspart3-140621153444-phpapp01-thumbnail.jpg?width=120&height=120&fit=bounds" /> Helen Clough - Department of the Interior, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, retired, Judith Kurtzman - Utah State University Writing clear Environmental Assessments (EAs) as required by the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) is critical to successful implementation of the law and more importantly good decisions. The NEPA process must be well documented in clear language so that the proposals, alternatives and the environmental effects of proposals and alternatives are clearing explained. Often the NEPA analysis is not well documented resulting in costly delays in projects as appeals and litigation occur regarding the NEPA analysis. This training session is a continuation of the materials presented in Writing Environmental Assessments, Parts 1 and 2. Resource-specific analysis (for examples, effects on wildlife, effects on recreation, effects on water quality) and cumulative impact analysis (effects of past, present, and “reasonably foreseeable” future actions) will be explored. Mitigation and monitoring will be addressed. As with the other NEPA sessions examples relevant to river management will be explored and critiqued. Ample time is allotted for discussion and questions from participants.

National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) Writing Environmental Assessments (EAs), Part 3 of 3 - Helen Clough and Judy Kurtzman from rshimoda2014

]]> 805 6 https://cdn.slidesharecdn.com/ss_thumbnails/nepa-writingeaspart3-140621153444-phpapp01-thumbnail.jpg?width=120&height=120&fit=bounds presentation Black http://activitystrea.ms/schema/1.0/post

http://activitystrea.ms/schema/1.0/posted

0 National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) Writing Environmental Assessments (EAs), Part 2 of 3 - Helen Clough and Judy Kurtzman /slideshow/nepa-writing-e-as-part-2-36146744/36146744 nepa-writingeaspart2-140621153434-phpapp02
Clough, Helen - Department of the Interior, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, retired This session follows Part 1 and will continue training on the EA process. Part 2 will address development of alternatives and description of the affected environment. Part 2 will end with a discussion of environmental consequences. Discussion of environmental consequences will carry over into Part 3. While environmental impact statements (EISs) and environmental assessments (EAs) have been prepared for federal and federally funded actions for over 40 years, developing a reasonable range of alternatives, identifying the affected environment and the actual analysis of the likely environmental effects of a proposed action is often poorly understood. The presenters will draw upon their over 50 years of experience with NEPA to describe alternatives, the affected environment and impact analysis focused on topics relevant to river management. Examples relevant to both river planning and river management will be explored and critiqued. Resource-specific analysis (for examples, effects on wildlife, effects on recreation, effects on water quality) and cumulative impact analysis (effects of past, present, and “reasonably foreseeable” future actions) will be explored. Sources of additional information and training on the subject will also be shared. Hands-on exercises will help participants expand knowledge and skill in impact assessment. ]]>
Clough, Helen - Department of the Interior, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, retired This session follows Part 1 and will continue training on the EA process. Part 2 will address development of alternatives and description of the affected environment. Part 2 will end with a discussion of environmental consequences. Discussion of environmental consequences will carry over into Part 3. While environmental impact statements (EISs) and environmental assessments (EAs) have been prepared for federal and federally funded actions for over 40 years, developing a reasonable range of alternatives, identifying the affected environment and the actual analysis of the likely environmental effects of a proposed action is often poorly understood. The presenters will draw upon their over 50 years of experience with NEPA to describe alternatives, the affected environment and impact analysis focused on topics relevant to river management. Examples relevant to both river planning and river management will be explored and critiqued. Resource-specific analysis (for examples, effects on wildlife, effects on recreation, effects on water quality) and cumulative impact analysis (effects of past, present, and “reasonably foreseeable” future actions) will be explored. Sources of additional information and training on the subject will also be shared. Hands-on exercises will help participants expand knowledge and skill in impact assessment. ]]> Sat, 21 Jun 2014 15:34:34 GMT /slideshow/nepa-writing-e-as-part-2-36146744/36146744 rshimoda2014@slideshare.net(rshimoda2014) National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) Writing Environmental Assessments (EAs), Part 2 of 3 - Helen Clough and Judy Kurtzman rshimoda2014 Clough, Helen - Department of the Interior, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, retired This session follows Part 1 and will continue training on the EA process. Part 2 will address development of alternatives and description of the affected environment. Part 2 will end with a discussion of environmental consequences. Discussion of environmental consequences will carry over into Part 3. While environmental impact statements (EISs) and environmental assessments (EAs) have been prepared for federal and federally funded actions for over 40 years, developing a reasonable range of alternatives, identifying the affected environment and the actual analysis of the likely environmental effects of a proposed action is often poorly understood. The presenters will draw upon their over 50 years of experience with NEPA to describe alternatives, the affected environment and impact analysis focused on topics relevant to river management. Examples relevant to both river planning and river management will be explored and critiqued. Resource-specific analysis (for examples, effects on wildlife, effects on recreation, effects on water quality) and cumulative impact analysis (effects of past, present, and “reasonably foreseeable” future actions) will be explored. Sources of additional information and training on the subject will also be shared. Hands-on exercises will help participants expand knowledge and skill in impact assessment. <img style="border:1px solid #C3E6D8;float:right;" alt="" src="https://cdn.slidesharecdn.com/ss_thumbnails/nepa-writingeaspart2-140621153434-phpapp02-thumbnail.jpg?width=120&height=120&fit=bounds" /> Clough, Helen - Department of the Interior, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, retired This session follows Part 1 and will continue training on the EA process. Part 2 will address development of alternatives and description of the affected environment. Part 2 will end with a discussion of environmental consequences. Discussion of environmental consequences will carry over into Part 3. While environmental impact statements (EISs) and environmental assessments (EAs) have been prepared for federal and federally funded actions for over 40 years, developing a reasonable range of alternatives, identifying the affected environment and the actual analysis of the likely environmental effects of a proposed action is often poorly understood. The presenters will draw upon their over 50 years of experience with NEPA to describe alternatives, the affected environment and impact analysis focused on topics relevant to river management. Examples relevant to both river planning and river management will be explored and critiqued. Resource-specific analysis (for examples, effects on wildlife, effects on recreation, effects on water quality) and cumulative impact analysis (effects of past, present, and “reasonably foreseeable” future actions) will be explored. Sources of additional information and training on the subject will also be shared. Hands-on exercises will help participants expand knowledge and skill in impact assessment.

National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) Writing Environmental Assessments (EAs), Part 2 of 3 - Helen Clough and Judy Kurtzman from rshimoda2014

]]> 624 8 https://cdn.slidesharecdn.com/ss_thumbnails/nepa-writingeaspart2-140621153434-phpapp02-thumbnail.jpg?width=120&height=120&fit=bounds presentation White http://activitystrea.ms/schema/1.0/post

http://activitystrea.ms/schema/1.0/posted

0 National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) Writing Environmental Assessments (EAs), Part 1 of 3 - Helen Clough and Judy Kurtzman /slideshow/nepa-writing-e-as-part-1-36146743/36146743 nepawritingeaspart1-140621153427-phpapp02
Clough, Helen - Department of the Interior, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, retired Judith Kurtzman - Utah State University Writing clear Environmental Assessments (EAs) as required by the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) is critical to successful implementation of the law and more importantly good decisions. The NEPA process must be well documented in clear language so that the proposals, alternatives and the environmental effects of proposals and alternatives are clearing explained. Often the NEPA analysis is not well documented resulting in costly delays in projects as appeals and litigation occur regarding the NEPA analysis. This training will focus on how to properly document the NEPA analysis for EAs with emphasis and examples relevant to rivers and river management. This first part of the 3-part training will review NEPA and the types of NEPA documentation. The session will focus on scoping, public involvement, and defining the purpose and need for action. The session will include exercises and review of relevant documents. Ample time is allotted for discussion and questions from participants. The session will be followed up by Parts 2 and 3 covering the rest of the EA process.]]>
Clough, Helen - Department of the Interior, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, retired Judith Kurtzman - Utah State University Writing clear Environmental Assessments (EAs) as required by the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) is critical to successful implementation of the law and more importantly good decisions. The NEPA process must be well documented in clear language so that the proposals, alternatives and the environmental effects of proposals and alternatives are clearing explained. Often the NEPA analysis is not well documented resulting in costly delays in projects as appeals and litigation occur regarding the NEPA analysis. This training will focus on how to properly document the NEPA analysis for EAs with emphasis and examples relevant to rivers and river management. This first part of the 3-part training will review NEPA and the types of NEPA documentation. The session will focus on scoping, public involvement, and defining the purpose and need for action. The session will include exercises and review of relevant documents. Ample time is allotted for discussion and questions from participants. The session will be followed up by Parts 2 and 3 covering the rest of the EA process.]]> Sat, 21 Jun 2014 15:34:27 GMT /slideshow/nepa-writing-e-as-part-1-36146743/36146743 rshimoda2014@slideshare.net(rshimoda2014) National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) Writing Environmental Assessments (EAs), Part 1 of 3 - Helen Clough and Judy Kurtzman rshimoda2014 Clough, Helen - Department of the Interior, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, retired Judith Kurtzman - Utah State University Writing clear Environmental Assessments (EAs) as required by the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) is critical to successful implementation of the law and more importantly good decisions. The NEPA process must be well documented in clear language so that the proposals, alternatives and the environmental effects of proposals and alternatives are clearing explained. Often the NEPA analysis is not well documented resulting in costly delays in projects as appeals and litigation occur regarding the NEPA analysis. This training will focus on how to properly document the NEPA analysis for EAs with emphasis and examples relevant to rivers and river management. This first part of the 3-part training will review NEPA and the types of NEPA documentation. The session will focus on scoping, public involvement, and defining the purpose and need for action. The session will include exercises and review of relevant documents. Ample time is allotted for discussion and questions from participants. The session will be followed up by Parts 2 and 3 covering the rest of the EA process. <img style="border:1px solid #C3E6D8;float:right;" alt="" src="https://cdn.slidesharecdn.com/ss_thumbnails/nepawritingeaspart1-140621153427-phpapp02-thumbnail.jpg?width=120&height=120&fit=bounds" /> Clough, Helen - Department of the Interior, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, retired Judith Kurtzman - Utah State University Writing clear Environmental Assessments (EAs) as required by the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) is critical to successful implementation of the law and more importantly good decisions. The NEPA process must be well documented in clear language so that the proposals, alternatives and the environmental effects of proposals and alternatives are clearing explained. Often the NEPA analysis is not well documented resulting in costly delays in projects as appeals and litigation occur regarding the NEPA analysis. This training will focus on how to properly document the NEPA analysis for EAs with emphasis and examples relevant to rivers and river management. This first part of the 3-part training will review NEPA and the types of NEPA documentation. The session will focus on scoping, public involvement, and defining the purpose and need for action. The session will include exercises and review of relevant documents. Ample time is allotted for discussion and questions from participants. The session will be followed up by Parts 2 and 3 covering the rest of the EA process.

National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) Writing Environmental Assessments (EAs), Part 1 of 3 - Helen Clough and Judy Kurtzman from rshimoda2014

]]> 1922 8 https://cdn.slidesharecdn.com/ss_thumbnails/nepawritingeaspart1-140621153427-phpapp02-thumbnail.jpg?width=120&height=120&fit=bounds presentation Black http://activitystrea.ms/schema/1.0/post

http://activitystrea.ms/schema/1.0/posted

0 https://public.slidesharecdn.com/v2/images/profile-picture.png https://cdn.slidesharecdn.com/ss_thumbnails/preparetolaunchupdateapril2018jh-180418024603-thumbnail.jpg?width=320&height=320&fit=bounds slideshow/prepare-to-launch-update-april-2018/94164588 Prepare to launch! Upd... https://cdn.slidesharecdn.com/ss_thumbnails/140417rivermanagementconferencepptpresentation-140622084857-phpapp02-thumbnail.jpg?width=320&height=320&fit=bounds slideshow/140417-river-management-conference-ppt-presentation/36161192 Mayor Karl Dean, City ... https://cdn.slidesharecdn.com/ss_thumbnails/rendonmichael-environmentalstewardsprogrampresentation-140621174436-phpapp02-thumbnail.jpg?width=320&height=320&fit=bounds slideshow/rendon-michael-environmental-stewards-program-presentation/36148386 Environmental stewards...